Treatment outcomes of hepatectomy for liver metastases of gastric cancer diagnosed using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Prospective single-arm multicenter interventional study of surgical resection for liver metastasis from gastric cancer; 3-year overall and recurrence-free survival

OBJECTIVE

Potential benefit of surgical resection for liver metastasis from gastric cancer (LMGC) remains controversial because most previous studies were retrospective. We evaluated the outcomes of surgical resection following chemotherapy for LMGC in a prospective single-arm multicenter interventional study.

METHODS

Patients with synchronous or metachronous LMGC received 2-4 cycles of standard chemotherapy and proceeded to surgical resection if restaging showed a non-progressive disease with a chance of R0 resection. The primary endpoint was 3-year OS of R0 patients, with RFS as secondary. Prognostic factors for R0 patients were evaluated by multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled between 2011 and 2019. Two patients were ineligible, and 20 discontinued treatment before surgery. Of the 48 patients eventually undergoing surgery, 43 accomplished R0 resection of the primary and/or metastatic GC, while 1 ended in R2 resection and 4 were considered ineligible. Median and 3-year OS for R0 patients were 39.8 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 26.9 to not reached) and 58.1 % (95 % CI, 43.1-71.8), respectively, while median and 3-year RFS were 14.9 months (95 % CI 7.9-34.0) and 34.9 % (95 % CI 22.2-50.1), respectively. On multivariable analysis, both multiple liver metastases and positive nodal status (pN1-3) were negatively associated with OS (multiple liver metastases: hazard ratio [HR] 2.71 (95 % CI, 1.16-6.35), P = 0.022; pN1-3: HR 9.11 (95 % CI, 1.22-68.2), P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

R0 resection following chemotherapy for LMGC yielded promising survival, with multiple liver metastases and positive nodal status being significant indicators of poor prognosis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN 000011445 (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).

Genomic biology and therapeutic strategies of liver metastasis from gastric cancer

The liver is a frequent site of metastasis in advanced gastric cancer (GC). Despite significant advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, the overall survival rate for patients afflicted with gastric cancer liver metastasis (GCLM) remains dismally low. Precision oncology has made significant progress in identifying therapeutic targets and enhancing our understanding of metastasis mechanisms through genome sequencing and molecular characterization. Therefore, it is crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of the various molecular processes involved in GCLM and the fundamental principles of systemic therapy to develop new treatment approaches. This paper aims to review recent findings on the diagnosis, potential biomarkers, and therapies targeting the multiple molecular processes of GCLM, with the goal of improving treatment strategies for patients with GCLM.

Surgical treatment for liver metastasis from gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes and prognostic factors

Chemotherapy is the mainstay treatment for liver metastasis from gastric cancer. However, some retrospective studies and meta-analyses have indicated the efficacy of hepatectomy, which is an aggressive treatment option. However, the optimal selection criteria for hepatectomy and the role of perioperative chemotherapy remain unclear. Therefore, a meta-analysis of studies on hepatectomy was performed to assess the impact of various factors on overall survival (OS). A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA criteria using studies published until 2022. The primary outcome was the hazard ratio (HR) for OS. Comparisons were made between hepatectomy and nonhepatectomy, solitary and multiple metastases, synchronous and metachronous metastases, treatment with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and treatment with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. A total of 50 studies involving 1966 patients who underwent hepatectomy were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis showed a 5-year OS rate of 25 %. A meta-analysis comparing hepatectomy with nonhepatectomy showed an HR of 0.2 for hepatectomy. A meta-analysis comparing solitary and multiple metastases showed a trend toward better OS in patients with solitary metastases (odds ratio [OR]: 0.35). A meta-analysis comparing synchronous and metachronous metastases showed favorable OS for patients with metachronous metastases (OR: 0.66). A meta-analysis comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with no neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed no difference in OS. In contrast, a meta-analysis comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with no adjuvant chemotherapy showed better OS for adjuvant chemotherapy (OR: 0.39). This retrospective study indicates that hepatectomy may benefit patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer, particularly those with solitary and metachronous metastases.

Prognostic Role of Preoperative Chemotherapy in Liver-Limited Metastasis from Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

We investigated the prognostic role of preoperative chemotherapy in patients who underwent hepatectomy for liver-limited metastasis (LLM) from gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted for 52 consecutive patients who underwent macroscopically complete (R0 or R1) resection for synchronous or metachronous LLM from GC.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients, 18 (35%) received preoperative chemotherapy (PC group), while 34 (65%) underwent upfront surgery (US group). The PC group had a significantly longer overall survival than the US group (cumulative 5-year OS rate: 47.6% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.041). Multivariate analysis of OS revealed that preoperative chemotherapy was an independent favorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 0.445, p = 0.036). Patients showing a partial response to preoperative chemotherapy on RECIST had an improved OS compared with those exhibiting stable or progressive disease after preoperative chemotherapy and with US (p = 0.025), even among those with solitary LLM (p = 0.062) and multiple LLM (p = 0.026). At recurrence after hepatectomy for LLM, the PC group had a significantly higher incidence of solitary tumors than the US group (p = 0.043) and had a higher chance to undergo surgical resection for recurrent sites (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative chemotherapy can be recommended for patients with LLM from GC. The evaluation of the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy offers additional information to determine the surgical indication for LLM.

Prediction model of liver metastasis risk in patients with gastric cancer: A population-based study

Liver was the most common site of distant metastasis in patients with gastric cancer (GC). The prediction model of the risk of liver metastasis was rarely proposed. Therefore, we aimed to establish a prediction model for liver metastasis in patients with GC. In this retrospective cohort study, we extracted demographic and clinical data of all the GC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registration database from 2010 to 2015. Patients were divided into training set (n = 1691) for model development and testing set (n = 3943) for validation. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out on the training set to screen potential predictors of liver metastasis and constructed a prediction model. The receiver operator characteristics curves with the area under curve values were used to assess the predictive performance of the liver metastasis prediction model. And a nomogram of the prediction model was also constructed. Of the total 5634 GC patients, 444 (7.88%) had liver metastasis. Variables including age, gender, N stage, T stage, Lauren classification, tumor size, histological type, and surgery were included in the liver metastasis prediction model. The study results indicated that the model had excellent discriminative ability with an area under curve of 0.851 (95% confidence interval: 0.829-0.873) in the training set, and that of 0.849 (95% confidence interval: 0.813-0.885) in the testing set. We have developed an effective prediction model with 8 easily acquired predictors of liver metastasis. The prediction model could predict the risk of liver metastasis in GC patients and performed well, which would assist clinicians to make individualized prediction of liver metastasis in GC patients and adjust treatment strategies in time to improve the prognosis.

What benefit can be obtained from magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis with artificial intelligence in prostate cancer compared with clinical assessments?

The present study aimed to explore the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) methodology based on magnetic resonance (MR) images to aid in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). To this end, we reviewed and summarized the studies comparing the diagnostic and predictive performance for PCa between AI and common clinical assessment methods based on MR images and/or clinical characteristics, thereby investigating whether AI methods are generally superior to common clinical assessment methods for the diagnosis and prediction fields of PCa. First, we found that, in the included studies of the present study, AI methods were generally equal to or better than the clinical assessment methods for the risk assessment of PCa, such as risk stratification of prostate lesions and the prediction of therapeutic outcomes or PCa progression. In particular, for the diagnosis of clinically significant PCa, the AI methods achieved a higher summary receiver operator characteristic curve (SROC-AUC) than that of the clinical assessment methods (0.87 vs. 0.82). For the prediction of adverse pathology, the AI methods also achieved a higher SROC-AUC than that of the clinical assessment methods (0.86 vs. 0.75). Second, as revealed by the radiomics quality score (RQS), the studies included in the present study presented a relatively high total average RQS of 15.2 (11.0-20.0). Further, the scores of the individual RQS elements implied that the AI models in these studies were constructed with relatively perfect and standard radiomics processes, but the exact generalizability and clinical practicality of the AI models should be further validated using higher levels of evidence, such as prospective studies and open-testing datasets.

Survival Outcomes of Hepatectomy in Gastric Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gastric cancer liver metastasis (GCLM) is a contraindication for surgical treatment in current guidelines. However, the results of recent studies are questioning this paradigm. We assessed survival outcomes and their predictors following hepatectomy for GCLM in a systematic review of studies published from 2000 to 2022 according to PRISMA guidelines. We identified 42,160 references in four databases. Of these, 55 articles providing data from 1990 patients fulfilled our criteria and were included. We performed a meta-analysis using random-effects models to assess overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at one, three, and five years post-surgery. We studied the impact of potential prognostic factors on survival outcomes via meta-regression. One, three, and five years after surgery, OS was 69.79%, 34.79%, and 24.68%, whereas DFS was 41.39%, 23.23%, and 20.18%, respectively. Metachronous presentation, well-to-moderate differentiation, small hepatic tumoral size, early nodal stage, R0 resection, unilobar compromisation, and solitary lesions were associated with higher overall survival. Metachronous presentation, smaller primary tumoral size, and solitary metastasis were linked to longer DFS. The results of our meta-analysis suggest that hepatectomy leads to favorable survival outcomes in patients with GCLM and provides data that might help select patients who will benefit most from surgical treatment.

Long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of gastric cancer (GC) with synchronous liver metastasis is still controversial. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes after different treatments of GC with synchronous liver metastasis.

METHODS

Several electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies updated on May 1, 2021. Studies assessing the overall survival (OS) after different treatments (including chemotherapy, interventional therapy, surgical therapy alone and adjunctive therapy after surgery) of GC with synchronous liver metastasis were included. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for survival variables.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies including 4312 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Adjunctive therapy after surgery performed better than surgery therapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.23, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.69-2.17), chemotherapy (HR = 1.18, 95%CrI: 0.71-1.95), and interventional therapy in terms of 1-year OS (HR = 2.03, 95%CrI: 1.22-3.37). In terms of 3-OS, adjunctive therapy after surgery showed better efficacy than surgery therapy alone (HR = 1.48, 95%CrI: 0.40-5.47), chemotherapy (HR = 1.27, 95%CrI: 0.37-4.35), and interventional therapy (HR = 3.16, 95%CrI: 0.73-13.63). For 5-OS, adjunctive therapy after surgery was superior to surgery therapy alone (HR = 1.74, 95%CrI: 0.08-37.76), chemotherapy (HR = 1.44, 95%CrI: 0.66-3.14), and interventional therapy (HR = 1.46, 95%CrI: 0.06-34.36). There were no statistical inconsistency and small-study effect existed in our network meta-analysis for 1-year, 3-year, or 5-year OS. Cluster ranking analysis performed with surface under the cumulative ranking showed adjuvant therapies after surgery (99.9, 96.7, 90.2) ranking higher than surgery therapy alone, chemotherapy, and interventional therapy for 1-year, 3-year, 5-year OS.

CONCLUSION

The OS of adjuvant therapy after surgery was better than that of surgery therapy alone, chemotherapy, and interventional therapy. Adjuvant therapy after surgery is the most recommended therapy for people with GC with synchronous liver metastasis.

Definition of oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer and impact of local oligometastasis-directed treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Local treatment (metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy) for oligometastatic disease (OMD) in patients with esophagogastric cancer may improve overall survival (OS). The primary aim was to identify definitions of esophagogastric OMD. A secondary aim was to perform a meta-analysis of OS after local treatment versus systemic therapy alone for OMD.

METHODS

Studies and study protocols reporting on definitions or OS after local treatment for esophagogastric OMD were included. The primary outcome was the maximum number of organs/lesions considered OMD and the maximum number of lesions per organ (i.e. 'organ-specific' OMD burden). Agreement was considered to be either absent/poor (< 50%), fair (50%-75%), or consensus (≥ 75%). The secondary outcome was the pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for OS after local treatment versus systemic therapy alone. The ROBINS tool was used for quality assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 97 studies, including 7 study protocols, and 2 prospective studies, were included. OMD was considered in 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases (consensus). 'Organ-specific' OMD burden could involve bilobar ≤ 3 liver metastases, unilateral ≤ 2 lung metastases, 1 extra-regional lymph node station, ≤ 2 brain metastases, or bilateral adrenal gland metastases (consensus). Local treatment for OMD was associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone based on 6 non-randomized studies (pooled aHR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30-0.74) and for liver oligometastases based on 5 non-randomized studies (pooled aHR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22-0.59). All studies scored serious risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature considers esophagogastric cancer spread limited to 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases or 1 extra-regional lymph node station to be OMD. Local treatment for OMD appeared associated with improved OS compared with systemic therapy alone. Prospective randomized trials are warranted.

Evidence Mapping of Proton Therapy, Heavy Ion Therapy, and Helical Tomotherapy for Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to systematically present application situation and therapeutic effect of proton therapy (PT), heavy ion therapy, and helical tomotherapy (TOMO) for gastric cancer (GC), and to find gaps of existing studies.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese Biological Medical Database were searched. Tables, bubble plot, and heat map were conducted to display results.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included. About PT, 7 single-arm studies showed median overall survival (OS) within 2-66 months and 1 study reported 40% of patients happened moderate degree of radiation gastritis. About TOMO, 1 study reported longer median OS and progression-free survival, lower occurrence of Grade III toxicity, and late toxicity compared to 3D-CRT, while another study remained neutral. About heavy ion therapy, there was no clinical study was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing studies presented good clinic treatment effect about PT and TOMO for GC, and furthermore clinical studies are needed.

Prospective Multicenter Interventional Study of Surgical Resection for Liver Metastasis from Gastric Cancer: R0 Resection Rate, and Operative Morbidity and Mortality

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for liver metastasis from gastric cancer (LMGC) remains uncertain. The relevance of surgical resection is controversial. We conducted a prospective multicenter interventional study of surgical resection for LMGC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with synchronous or metachronous LMGC who were surgically fit were registered. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent R0 resection. Secondary endpoints were R0 resection rate, operative morbidity and mortality, 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of R0 patients, and OS in all registered patients.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were registered from 24 institutions between December 2011 and November 2019 and received preoperative chemotherapy. Three patients were ineligible, and 19 patients discontinued treatment, with disease progression in 12, adverse events in 4, and consent withdrawal in 3 before surgery. Of the 48 patients eventually undergoing surgery, R0 resection of the primary and/or metastatic GC was accomplished in 43 patients, while 1 patient discontinued treatment for positive peritoneal lavage cytology and 4 patients were considered ineligible based on postoperative pathological findings other than GC. The R0 resection rate of all eligible patients was 68.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 55.3-79.4%, 43/63 patients], while that of all resected patients was 89.6% (95% CI 77.3-96.5%, 43/48 patients). Postoperative complications were identified in 12 out of 43 patients (27.9%), and Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complications occurred in seven patients (16.3%). No hospital mortality was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

R0 resection for LMGC could be performed in approximately two-thirds of all eligible patients, with acceptable surgical morbidity and mortality.

HIFU for the treatment of gastric cancer with liver metastases with unsuitable indications for hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation: a prospective and propensity score-matched study

Background

The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in gastric cancer with liver metastasis (GCLM) patients who were contraindicated for either hepatectomy or radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Methods

This is a prospective, observational study on GCLM patients with 1–3 liver metastases. The primary gastric lesions were thoroughly resected and any case that exhibited extra-hepatic metastasis was excluded. A 1:2:2 propensity score-matching analysis was performed using a logistic regression model on the HIFU group, best supportive care (BSC) group, and palliative chemotherapy (PC) group. The primary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Forty patients were finally included, there were 8 cases in HIFU group, 16 cases in BSC group, and 16 cases in PC group. The median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 10 months. The median PFS was 16.5 months in HIFU group, 2 months in BSC group, and 5 months in PC group. The median OS was 27.5 months in the HIFU group, 7 months in the BSC group, and 11.5 months in the PC group. Additionally, no grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in the HIFU group.

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that HIFU treatment could improve the long-term prognosis of GCLM patients without a significant increase in the occurrence of adverse events. Compared with PC and BSC, HIFU is the preferred treatment option when GCLM patients without extra-hepatic metastasis are unable to undergo either surgery or RFA.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-021-01307-y.

Surgical treatment of gastric cancer liver metastases: Systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term outcomes and prognostic factors

The prognosis of patients with metastatic gastric cancer remains dismal, with palliative treatment as standard of care. However, encouraging results have been reported for surgical resection of liver only metastatic gastric cancer in carefully selected patients. A systematic review of articles published from 2000 onwards was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Twenty-nine studies were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis of proportions pointed out 29.1 % 5ySR (I 2 = 39 %). The pooled weighted median of MSTs was 31.1 months. T stage > 2, metastasis greatest dimension ≥ 5 cm, the presence of multiple metastases and bilobar disease resulted among the strongest predictors of mortality. Funnel plots, Egger's tests, and P-curve analyses failed to show significant publication bias. Based on strict selection criteria and robust statistical analyses, our results show that, in very carefully selected patients without extrahepatic disease, surgical resection with curative intent may significantly improve overall survival.

Efficacy of Surgery for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors

BACKGROUND

In the last 10 years, the management of patients with gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLM) has changed from chemotherapy alone, towards a multidisciplinary treatment with liver surgery playing a leading role. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of hepatectomy for GCLM and to analyze the impact of related prognostic factors on long-term outcomes.

METHODS

The databases PubMed (Medline), EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant articles from January 2010 to September 2020. We included prospective and retrospective studies that reported the outcomes after hepatectomy for GCLM. A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prognostic factors was performed.

RESULTS

We included 40 studies, including 1573 participants who underwent hepatic resection for GCLM. Post-operative morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 24.7% and 1.6%, respectively. One-year, 3-years, and 5-years overall survival (OS) were 72%, 37%, and 26%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-years, and 5-years disease-free survival (DFS) were 44%, 24%, and 22%, respectively. Well-moderately differentiated tumors, pT1-2 and pN0-1 adenocarcinoma, R0 resection, the presence of solitary metastasis, unilobar metastases, metachronous metastasis, and chemotherapy were all strongly positively associated to better OS and DFS.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, we demonstrated that hepatectomy for GCLM is feasible and provides benefits in terms of long-term survival. Identification of patient subgroups that could benefit from surgical treatment is mandatory in a multidisciplinary setting.

Oncological outcomes in patients with pT1N0-3 or pT2-3N0 gastric cancer after curative resection without adjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The survival outcomes of pT1N0-3 or pT2-3N0 gastric cancer after curative resection are favorable without adjuvant chemotherapy. However, some patients develop recurrence and details of these recurrences remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors in patients with pT1N0-3 or pT2-3N0 gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1219 patients with pT1N0-3 or pT2-3N0 gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy without neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy between April 2007 and March 2012 at Cancer Institute Hospital.

RESULTS

This cohort included 895 pT1N0, 73 pT1N1, 23 pT1N2, 6 pT1N3, 130 pT2N0, and 92 pT3N0 patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) for pT1N0-3 and pT2-3N0 gastric cancer were 98.9% (95% CI 98.1-99.4) and 97.7% (95% CI 96.7-98.4), respectively. Age (HR 3.56, 95% CI 2.10-6.03) and lymphovascular involvement (hazard ratio (HR) 2.98, 95% CI 1.76-5.04) were independent prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis for RFS. The 5-year RFS for patients aged ≥75 years or with lymphovascular involvement were 94.4% (95% CI 89.8-97.0) and 95.1% (95% CI 92.5-96.8), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The survival outcomes of pT1N0-3 and pT2-3N0 were excellent, even in patients with aged >75 years or lymphovascular involvement which were risk factors. However, the sample size of T1N3 gastric cancer is small, so larger sample size and risk factor analysis are required.

Current status of conversion surgery for stage IV gastric cancer

Palliative chemotherapy with best supportive care is a mainstay for patients with gastric cancer (GC) and distant metastasis. However, with advances in GC chemotherapy, multimodal treatment, including perioperative chemotherapy plus conversion surgery, has attracted attention as a new strategy to improve the outcome of patients with stage IV disease. Conversion surgery is defined as surgical treatment aimed at R0 resection after a good response to induction chemotherapy for tumors originally considered unresectable or marginally resectable for technical and/or oncological reasons. Various biological characteristics differ, depending on each metastatic condition in stage IV GC. The main metastatic pathways of GC can be divided into three categories: lymphatic, hematogenous, and peritoneal. In each category, considerable historical data on conversion surgery have demonstrated the benefits of individualized approaches. However, owing to the diversity of these conditions, a common definition, including the choice of induction chemotherapy, optimal timing of resection, and eligibility for conversion surgery, has not been established among surgical oncologists. Thus, we explore the current and future treatment options by reviewing the literature on this controversial topic comprehensively.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of liver metastases from extrahepatic primary cancers 2021

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy is standard treatment for colorectal liver metastases; however, it is unclear whether liver metastases from other primary cancers should be resected or not. The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery therefore created clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic liver tumors.

METHODS

Eight primary diseases were selected based on the number of hepatectomies performed for each malignancy per year. Clinical questions were structured in the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) format. Systematic reviews were performed, and the strength of recommendations and the level of quality of evidence for each clinical question were discussed and determined. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations.

RESULTS

The eight primary sites were grouped into five categories based on suggested indications for hepatectomy and consensus of the guidelines committee. Fourteen clinical questions were devised, covering five topics: (1) diagnosis, (2) operative treatment, (3) ablation therapy, (4) the eight primary diseases, and (5) systemic therapies. The grade of recommendation was strong for one clinical question and weak for the other 13 clinical questions. The quality of the evidence was moderate for two questions, low for 10, and very low for two. A flowchart was made to summarize the outcomes of the guidelines for the indications of hepatectomy and systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines were developed to provide useful information based on evidence in the published literature for the clinical management of liver metastases, and they could be helpful for conducting future clinical trials to provide higher-quality evidence.

Prognostic Factors After Hepatectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma Liver Metastases: Desmoplastic Growth Pattern as the Key to Improved Overall Survival

Purpose

Hepatectomy (Hp) is an alternative approach for the treatment of gastric carcinoma liver metastases (GCLM). However, prognostic factors that may assist patient selection are still controversial. Several pathologic features, such as the growth pattern (GP), associated with prognosis in colorectal cancer liver metastases, were never investigated in GCLM. Our principal aim was to assess if the GP has prognostic impact on GCLM.

Patients and Methods

Review of the clinical and pathological characteristics of 19 consecutive patients submitted to surgical resection of GCLM with curative intent at our department. Major potential prognostic factors considered were patients’ gender, age, timing and extent of Hp, postoperative course, as well as histopathological characteristics of primary and secondary tumors.

Results

Major morbidity occurred in four patients, mortality in one. Median and 5-year overall survival were 17 months and 26.7%, respectively. Ten patients developed recurrent disease and two patients survived more than 10 years. Factors independently associated with overall survival were the absence of major morbidity, distal location of the primary tumor, and desmoplastic GP (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The selection of patients is crucial for the improvement of survival rates of GCLM. Consequently, we demonstrate for the first time that the desmoplastic GP of GCLM is associated with improved outcomes, prompting further research on tumor–host interactions.

Surgical resection of synchronous liver metastases in gastric cancer patients. A propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to determine the value of synchronous liver resection in patients with oligo-metastatic gastric cancer and the prognostic factors in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We compared the results of 21 gastric patients with liver metastases and synchronous liver resection (LMR) to 21 propensity score-matched patients with gastric cancer and liver metastases in whom liver resection was not performed (LM0) and to a propensity score-matched control group of 21 patients without liver metastases and stage III and IV resectable gastric cancer (CG).

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival of LMR, LM0 and CG were 14.3%, 0%, and 19%, respectively (p = 0.002). Five-year survival was 47.5% for well-differentiated tumour compared to 0% in patients with moderate or poor tumour differentiation (p = 0.006). In addition, patients with R0 resection and TNM stage N0-1 had a significantly better survival compared to patients with TNM N stage N2-3 (5-year survival: 60% for N0-1 vs. 7.7% for N2-3; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The results presented in the study support synchronous liver resections in gastric patients and provide additional criteria for patient selection.

Do liver metastases from gastric cancer contraindicate aggressive surgical resection? A 14-year single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Advanced gastric cancer (GC) with liver metastasis is often characterized by multiple and bilobular metastases and may also be associated with extrahepatic metastatic lesions. Hence, many physicians consider that radical surgeries are contraindicated for liver metastases from GC (LMGC). According to the 2017 Japanese treatment guideline for GC, a smaller number of liver metastases without unresectable factors may be an indication for liver resection (LR) with curability. The actual 5-year overall survival (OS) rate ranges from 0 to 0.37.

AIM

To present the institutional indications for LR for LMGC and identify important factors for prognostic outcomes.

METHODS

In total, 30 patients underwent LR for LMGC during a 14-year period, and we evaluated the clinical, surgical, and oncological findings. In all patients, radical surgery with intentional lymphadenectomy was performed for the primary GC. The median follow-up duration after the initial LR was 33.7 mo, and three patients with no recurrence died of causes unrelated to the LMGC. The OS and recurrence-free survival rates after the initial LR were assessed.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients had metachronous LMGC. The initial LR achieved curability in 29 patients. Perioperative chemotherapy was introduced in 23 patients. The median greatest LMGC dimension was 30 mm, and the median number of LMGC was two. Twenty-two patients had unilobular LMGC. The 5-year OS and recurrence-free survival rates were 0.48 and 0.28, respectively. The median survival duration and recurrence-free duration after the initial LR were 16.8 and 8.6 mo, respectively. Twenty-one patients developed recurrence after the initial LR. Additional surgeries for recurrence were performed in nine patients, and these surgeries clearly prolonged the patients' survival. Pathological serosal invasion was an independent predictor of a poor prognostic outcome after the initial LR. Aggressive LR may be indicated for carefully selected patients with LMGC.

CONCLUSION

Our results of LR for LMGC seem acceptable. Additional surgeries for recurrence after the initial LR might prolong OS. Pathological serosal invasion is important for poor prognostic outcomes.

Is There a Role for Locoregional Therapies for Non-colorectal Gastrointestinal Malignancies?

The liver is the most common site of metastases from solid gastrointestinal tract tumors. Over the past few decades, the role of locoregional therapies, resection and thermal ablation, for neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases has been widely studied. However, for liver metastases originating from other gastrointestinal organs, the role of locoregional treatment remains unclear. This review summarizes and discusses the available evidence regarding benefits, risks, and indications for locoregional therapies for non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine gastrointestinal liver metastases, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary approach and patient selection.

Pulmonary resection for metachronous metastatic gastric cancer diagnosed using multi-detector computed tomography: Report of five cases

•

The standard treatment for metastatic gastric cancer is systemic chemotherapy.

•

Pulmonary resection for metastatic gastric cancer has been rarely reported on.

•

Five patients with metastatic gastric cancer diagnosed using MDCT underwent surgery.

•

We demonstrated remarkably better survival values compared to previous reports.

•

Pulmonary resection may be treatment option for select patients.

Introduction

As pulmonary resection for metastatic gastric cancer has been rarely reported on, the role of metastasectomy remains unclear in such settings. We reviewed the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients with metachronous pulmonary metastasis from gastric cancer (MPMGC) diagnosed using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) who underwent pulmonary resection.

Presentation of case

From September 2002 to May 2018, five patients underwent pulmonary resection for MPMGC at Shizuoka Cancer Center. All patients received curative resection for initial gastric cancer. Three patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median age at pulmonary resection was 70 years. The median disease-free interval between initial gastrectomy and MPMGC diagnosis was 41 months. The first site of recurrence was the lung in all patients. All patients were diagnosed as having primary lung cancer using MDCT before pulmonary resection and fit the surgical indication for primary lung cancer. Lobectomy was performed in three patients, while wedge resection was performed in two. The median overall survival following pulmonary resection was 79 (range, 18–89) months. Two patients experienced recurrence. While one showed recurrence in the mediastinal lymph node, in the other it was observed in the remnant lung; the latter underwent repeated pulmonary resection followed by systemic chemotherapy. Four patients survived for longer than 4 years after pulmonary resection.

Conclusions

Of the five patients with MPMGC diagnosed using MDCT who underwent pulmonary resection, long-term survival was achieved after pulmonary resection in four. Thus, pulmonary resection may be considered for those diagnosed with lung nodules after surgery for gastric cancer, and who fit the surgical indication for primary lung cancer.

Is there a role for treatment-oriented surgery in liver metastases from gastric cancer?

BACKGROUND

Distant metastases are found in approximately 35% of patients with gastric cancer at their first clinical observation, and of these, 4%-14% involves the liver. Unfortunately, only 0.4%-2.3% of patients with metastatic gastric cancer are eligible for radical surgery. Although surgical resection for gastric cancer metastases is still debated, there have been changes in recent years, although several clinical issues remain to be defined and that must be taken into account before surgery is proposed.

AIM

To analyze the clinicopathological factors related to primary gastric tumor and metastases that impact the survival of patients with liver metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2018 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The study protocol was based on identifying studies with clearly defined purpose, eligibility criteria, methodological analysis, and patient outcome.

RESULTS

We selected 47 studies pertaining to the purpose of the review, which involved a total of 2304 patients. Median survival was 7-52.3 mo, median disease-free survival was 4.7-18 mo. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 33%-90.1%, 10%-60%, 6%-70.4%, and 0%-40.1%, respectively. Only five papers reported the 10-year OS, which was 5.5%–31.5%. The general recurrence rate was between 55.5% and 96%, and that for hepatic recurrence was between 15% and 94%.

CONCLUSION

Serous infiltration and lymph node involvement of the primary cancer indicate an unfavorable prognosis, while the presence of single metastasis or ≤ 3 metastases associated with a size of < 5 cm may be considered data that do not contraindicate liver resection.

Outcomes of surgical resection for gastric cancer liver metastases: a retrospective analysis

Background

The indications for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer liver metastases (GCLMs) remain controversial. In addition, the outcome of surgery for the treatment of liver metastases of alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer (AFP-GC) has not yet been reported. We assessed the clinicopathologic features, including AFP-GC, and the surgical results of these patients.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed 20 patients who underwent hepatectomy for GCLM at Odawara Municipal Hospital between April 2006 and January 2016.

Results

The actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after primary hepatectomy were 80.0%, 55.5%, and 31.7%, respectively, with a median OS of 42 months. Four patients survived for more than 5 years after their final hepatectomy procedures. A multivariate analysis showed multiple metastases in the liver, the elevated level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and an age of less than 70 years to be independently associated with a poor prognosis in terms of OS. No significant differences were noted between the AFP-GC and AFP-negative GC groups.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment is therefore considered to be a feasible option for GCLM. The findings of the present study showed the number of metastatic liver tumors, the level of CA19-9, and the patient age to be prognostic indicators for the surgical treatment of GCLM.

Chinese consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer with liver metastases

Background

The incidence of gastric cancer with liver metastases (GCLM) is 9.9-18.7%, with a median survival time of 11 months and a 5-year survival rate <20%. Multidisciplinary treatment (MDT) is gradually gaining recognition as the most important method. However, specific treatment plans remain unclear. The aim of study was to provide a consensus to improve the diagnosis and treatment of GCLM.

Methods

We brought together experts from relevant medical fields across China, including the Chinese Research Hospital Association Digestive Tumor Committee, Chinese Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, Chinese Gastric Cancer Association, and the Gastrointestinal Surgical Group of Chinese Surgical Society Affiliated to Chinese Medical Association, to discuss and formulate this consensus.

Results

A consensus was reached on the diagnosis and treatment of GCLM. Moreover, we have developed a new clinical classification system, the Chinese Type for Gastric Cancer Liver Metastases, based on the likelihood of a surgical treatment being successful.

Conclusions

The MDT mode should be implemented throughout all treatment of GCLM.A Chinese version of this expert consensus has been published in the Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery (Volume 39, Issue 10, p. 405-411). Written permission was obtained from the Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery to disseminate the expert consensus in English.

A clinical metabolomics-based biomarker signature as an approach for early diagnosis of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma

Gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) has a high mortality rate worldwide; however, current early diagnostic methods lack efficacy. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to identify potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis of GCA. Global metabolic profiles were obtained from plasma samples collected from 21 patients with GCA and 48 healthy controls using ultra-performance liquid chromatography/quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The orthogonal partial least squares discrimination analysis model was applied to distinguish patients with GCA from healthy controls and to identify potential biomarkers. Metabolic pathway analysis was performed using MetaboAnalyst (version 4.0) and revealed that ‘glycerophospholipid metabolism’, ‘linoleic acid metabolism’, ‘fatty acid biosynthesis’ and ‘primary bile acid biosynthesis’ were significantly associated with GCA. In addition, an early diagnostic model for GCA was established based on the relative levels of four key biomarkers, including phosphorylcholine, glycocholic acid, L-acetylcarnitine and arachidonic acid. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that the diagnostic model had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.977 and 0.952, respectively. The present study demonstrated that metabolomics may aid the identification of the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of GCA. In addition, the proposed diagnostic method may serve as a promising approach for the early diagnosis of GCA.

Essential updates 2017/2018: Recent topics in the treatment and research of gastric cancer in Japan

Recent developments in diagnostic technology, accumulated clinical effort and established evidence have boosted early detection and drastically improved early and long-term outcomes of gastric cancer. However, gastric cancer continues to be one of the most aggressive and life-threatening malignancies among all cancers and is a global health problem. Between January 2017 and December 2018, various fascinating reports of managements and research were published, including the new 15th Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma reflecting the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) tumor, node and metastasis (TNM) classification (October 2017) and the new Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines version 5 (January 2018). Moreover, pivotal molecular features of gastric cancer were clarified by the worldwide cancer genome project, and various treatment targets and biomarkers such as circulating DNAs and microRNAs were detected. Novel treatment options using programmed cell death protein 1 immune checkpoint inhibitors have been started. In this review, we summarize the recent topics of classification, guidelines, and clinical and basic research in order to bring new insights to gastric cancer treatment.

Surgical management of metastatic gastric cancer: moving beyond the guidelines

Despite decreasing incidence, gastric cancer remains a major health problem worldwide and is associated with poor survival. The poor survival is mainly attributed to delayed presentation which may cause local or systemic metastases. The standard of care for patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) is palliative chemotherapy with best supportive care. Although the survival has improved owing to advances in chemotherapeutic agents, it is still unsatisfactory, and some perspective changes are needed in the management of MGC to improve the outcomes. Therefore, various alternative treatment strategies for MGC have formed the most important research topics. Liver-directed treatment (LDT) options such as liver resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) have been studied in the management of liver metastasis from gastric cancer (LMGC). Intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) in addition to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) aiming to remove all macroscopic tumor focus resulting from peritoneal dissemination is the treatment option for peritoneal metastasis, while para-aortic lymph node dissection is the treatment option for para-aortic lymph node metastasis which is considered to be M1 disease. Conversion surgery is a novel concept aiming at R0 resection for originally unresectable or marginally resectable tumors after a remarkably good response to the chemotherapy. Large amounts of data in the literature have demonstrated the benefits of individualized approaches such as the combination of systemic and local treatment options in selected patient groups. In this review, we aimed to explore the current and future treatment options by reviewing the literature on this controversial topic.

Hepatectomy for Liver Metastasis of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background. Management of gastric cancer (GC) with liver metastases is debated. It is still controversial whether surgical resection provides a survival benefit or not. This systematic review was designed to evaluate the efficacy of hepatectomy for GC liver metastasis. Methods. We searched several electronic databases to identify eligible studies updated on September 2018. Studies assessing the efficacy and safety of hepatectomy versus no hepatectomy were included. Odds ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were utilized for main outcome analysis. Results. In all, 10 studies were included. Patients who underwent hepatectomy had lower 1-year (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.10-0.22, P < .00001), 3-year (OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.10-0.27, P < .00001), and 5-year mortality (OR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.07-0.24, P < .00001) than those without hepatectomy. We also reported favorable survival outcome in patients with metachronous hepatic resection versus synchronous hepatic resection (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.21-3.60, P = .008). However, there was no significant difference between solitary and multiple liver metastases (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.35-1.07, P = .08). Conclusion. The present study demonstrates that hepatic resection in the management of liver metastases of GC can prolong the survival of patients and should be considered a promising treatment for such patients. Furthermore, there are more favorable outcomes in patients with metachronous metastases versus those with synchronous disease. Therefore, metachronous hepatic metastases from GC are not necessarily a contraindication for hepatectomy of the metastatic site.

[Therapeutic approach in oligometastatic gastric and esophageal cancer]

The therapeutic approach to patients with oligometastatic gastric cancer and esophageal cancer is currently undergoing a shift towards a more aggressive therapy including surgical resection. In the current German S3 guidelines surgical treatment of metastatic disease is not recommended; however, nowadays interdisciplinary tumor boards have to evaluate such patients increasingly more often. On an individual basis a radical surgical resection of the primary tumor and the metastases is considered and performed in patients who respond well to multimodal chemotherapy concepts. In this review article the currently available data from the literature are discussed and a foundation for individually extended surgical approaches is presented. Together with the currently available results of the FLOT 3 study and the mostly retrospective studies, it seems to be possible to identify patients who would profit from such an aggressive treatment. In the future randomized prospective studies, such as the RENAISSANCE/FLOT 5 study and the GASTRIPEC study will have to evaluate whether an aggressive surgical therapy within multimodal therapy concepts of metastatic gastric and esophageal carcinomas is warranted.

Aggressive Graphic/Surgical R0 Resection and Jejunal Interposition with Preservation of Mesojejunal Autonomic Nerves in Patients with Stage IV Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Report of 3 Cases

BACKGROUND Three patients with stage IV esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) underwent extended resection to achieve a graphic/surgical R0 status (no visible remnant of viable tumor in imaging/surgical findings) and adjuvant chemotherapy from the early postoperative period. We also introduced use of our digestive reconstruction technique in these patients. CASE REPORT We used jejunal interposition for digestive reconstruction, which involved end-to-end jejunojejunostomy with a biofragmentable anastomosis ring. The mesojejunal autonomic nerves of the lifted jejunum were preserved. The first adenocarcinoma involved the perilesional lymph nodes (LNs). Graphic/surgical R0 resection was completed by para-aortic LN dissection. The diagnosis (Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma) was stage IV [pM1(LYM)]. Adjuvant chemotherapy began on postoperative day (POD) 11. The second adenocarcinoma was accompanied by a solitary lung metastasis. Intraoperative cytology of ascitic fluid was positive, and cisplatin was intraperitoneally administered. Adjuvant chemotherapy began on POD 10. The solitary lung metastasis was then resected, and graphic/surgical R0 resection was achieved. The diagnosis was stage IV [pM1(PUL) and CY1]. The third adenocarcinoma was accompanied by multiple liver metastases and metastatic regional LNs. The diagnosis was stage IV [H1]. Systemic chemotherapy was repeated. Only a solitary liver metastasis remained and was treated by radiofrequency ablation. Conversion surgery was conducted, achieving graphic/surgical R0 resection. Systemic chemotherapy was continued from POD 10. CONCLUSIONS For patients with stage IV EGJC, extended resection to achieve a graphic/surgical R0 status is still controversial, and systemic chemotherapy is important. The results of the present study suggest that our physiological reconstruction technique does not affect the efficacy of other therapies, such as adjuvant chemotherapy.

Validation of the prognostic impact of the new tumor-node-metastasis clinical staging in patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

In the 8th edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, the gastric cancer staging system includes two classifications: the clinical stage (cStage) and the postoperative pathologic stage. However, the correlation between the new cStage and overall survival has not been studied. Moreover, clinical N (cN) grade analysis is not included in the new clinical staging system. This study validated the prognostic value of cStage in the 8th edition of the TNM classification and the significance of N classification for pretreatment staging in gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 4374 patients with primary gastric cancer who underwent surgery at the Shizuoka Cancer Center were included. Survival analysis was conducted based on the newly proposed cStage criteria of the TNM 8th edition. Prognostic accuracy was evaluated using Harrell's concordance index (C-index).

RESULTS

The five-year survival rates according to cStage were as follows: cStageI, 91.2%, cStageIIA: 75.1%, cStageIIB: 57.7%, cStageIII: 43.2%, cStageIVA: 31.6%, and cStageIVB: 7.7%. Significant differences were observed among all stages (P < 0.001). The cStage C-index was 0.802. Meanwhile, the five-year survival rates based on cN were as follows: cN0: 83.7%, cN1: 57.2%, cN2: 42.4%, cN3a: 22.1%, and cN3b: 0.0%. Significant differences were also observed among all cN grades (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The cStage of the 8th edition of the TNM classification has a good capability to predict prognosis; thus, it may be a useful indicator for selecting appropriate gastric cancer treatment modalities. In addition, cN can be included in developing a more precise clinical staging of gastric cancer.

The survival benefit of palliative gastrectomy and/or metastasectomy in gastric cancer patients with synchronous metastasis: a population-based study using propensity score matching and coarsened exact matching

Introduction: Palliative surgeries were controversial for asymptomatic metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) patients. This study was aimed to evaluate survival benefit of palliative surgeries to gastric and/or metastatic tumors in mGC patients based on U.S population.

Materials and Methods: A total of 8345 gastric cancer patients diagnosed with synchronous distal metastasis between 2004 to 2013 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database were divided into four groups according to surgery strategies: surgeries to both primary and metastatic tumors (SPM), gastrectomy only (GO), metastasectomy only (MO) and no surgery performed (NS). Their clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed before and after propensity score matching (PSM) and coarsened exact matching (CEM).

Results: The median OS of SPM and GO patients was both significantly higher than NS patients (11 months vs. 8 months vs. 5 months; P<0.001, respectively) while that of MO was not (6 months vs. 5 months; P= 0.286). In comparisons between surgery strategies, survival benefit was similar between SPM and GO groups (P=0.389) and both showed significantly better survival than MO patients (P<0.001). All surgery strategies were proved to be favorable prognostic factors over non-surgical treatment (Hazard ratio (HR) for SPM: 0.60, P<0.001; HR for GO: 0.62, P<0.001; HR for MO: 0.91, P=0.046). Similar results were obtained after matching by PSM and CEM except that prognostic impact of MO deteriorated.

Conclusions: Gastrectomy plus metastasectomy or gastrectomy alone could be adopted as a choice of improving survival in the U.S population. Metastasectomy alone is not generally recommended.

Surgery with curative intent for stage IV gastric cancer: Is it a reality of illusion?

Gastric cancer with metastases outside of the regional lymph nodes is deemed oncologically unresectable. Nevertheless, some metastatic lesions are technically resectable by applying established surgical techniques such as para-aortic lymphadenectomy and hepatectomy. At the time of compilation of the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines version 4, systematic reviews were conducted to see whether it is feasible to make any recommendation to dissect both the primary and metastatic lesions with intent to cure, possibly as part of multimodality treatment. Long-term survivors were found among carefully selected groups of patients both in prospective and retrospective studies. In addition, there is a growing list of publications reporting encouraging outcomes of gastrectomy conducted after exceptionally good response to chemotherapy, usually among patients who underwent R0 resection. This type of surgery is often referred to as conversion surgery. It is sometimes difficult to define a clear borderline between curative surgery scheduled after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the conversion surgery. This review summarizes what we knew after the literature reviews conducted at the time of compiling the Japanese guidelines and in addition reflects some new findings obtained thereafter through clinical trials and retrospective studies. Metastases were divided into three categories based on the major metastatic pathways: lymphatic, hematogenous, and peritoneal. In each of these categories, there were findings that could provide hope for patients with metastatic disease. These findings implied that the surgical technique that we already use could become more useful upon further developments in antineoplastic agents and drug delivery.

Long-term survival after liver metastasectomy in gastric cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Despite the amelioration of systemic therapy, overall survival (OS) of metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients remains poor. Liver is a common metastatic site and retrospective series suggest a potential OS benefit from hepatectomy, with interesting 5-year (5 y) and 10-year (10 y) OS rates in selected patients. We aim to evaluate the impact of liver resection and related prognostic factors on long-term outcome in this setting.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and Abstracts/posters from international meetings since 1990. Data were extracted from publish papers. Random effects models meta-analyses and meta-regression models were built to assess 5yOS and the impact of different prognostic factor. Heterogeneity was assessed using between study variance, I² and Cochran's Q. Funnel plot were used to assess small study bias.

RESULTS

Thirty-three observational studies (for a total of 1304 patients) were included. Our analysis demonstrates a 5yOS rate of 22% (95%CI: 18-26%) and 10yOS rate of 11% (95%CI: 7-18%) among patients undergoing radical hepatectomy. A favorable effect on OS was shown by several factors linked to primary cancer (lower T and N stage, no lympho-vascular or serosal invasion) and burden of hepatic disease (≤3 metastases, unilobar involvement, greatest lesion < 5 cm, negative resection margins). Moreover, lower CEA and CA19.9 levels and post-resection chemotherapy were associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of liver metastases from GC seems associated with a significant chance of 5yOS and 10yOS and compares favourably with results of medical treatment alone. Prospective evaluation of this approach and validation of adequate selection criteria are needed.

Role of hepatectomy in gastric cancer with multiple liver-limited metastases

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated the benefit of hepatectomy for treating gastric cancer (GC) with liver-limited metastases (LLM). The survival benefit of hepatectomy compared with that of systemic chemotherapy is unknown, particularly in patients with multiple LLM. This study investigated the survival benefit of hepatectomy compared with that of systemic chemotherapy administered to patients with GC with multiple LLM.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive patients with GC with two or three LLM who underwent hepatectomy or received systemic chemotherapy as initial treatment at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between December 2004 and December 2015.

RESULTS

Nine of 24 patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent hepatectomy, and 15 received chemotherapy. In the hepatectomy group, all patients achieved R0 resection and none died during hospitalization. Three patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Disease recurred in eight patients (88.9%). In the chemotherapy group, three patients underwent hepatectomy following initial chemotherapy and did not experience recurrence or death during follow-up. Median follow-up was 47.9 months and median overall survival (OS) was 38.1 and 24.8 months in the chemotherapy and hepatectomy groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis of OS, including initial treatment, revealed that unilobar liver metastasis was the only independent favorable prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Although hepatectomy for patients with GC with multiple LLM is not recommended as the initial therapy, it prolonged the survival of patients with tumors controlled using systemic chemotherapy.

Adjuvant hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy after hemihepatectomy for gastric cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The most frequent pattern of recurrence is remnant liver after hepatectomy for gastric cancer liver metastases (GLM). The evidence of adjuvant hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) after hepatectomy for GLM is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant HAIC after hemihepatectomy for GLM.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2012, 14 patients who underwent hemihepatectomy for GLM were included in this study. Adjuvant HAIC to the remnant hemiliver was the FEM regimen (333 mg/m² 5-fluorouracil each week, 30 mg/m² epirubicin once every 4 weeks, and 2.7 mg/m² mitomycin-C once every 2 weeks) and was administered for 6 months after hemihepatectomy. Clinicopathological prognostic factors for survival were analyzed using a prospectively collected database.

RESULTS

Nine patients had solitary GLM, and 5 patients had multiple GLM before surgery. The median period from hemihepatectomy to HAIC was 30 days. The 6-month HAIC completion rate was 79% (n = 11/14). Reasons of HAIC failure included liver dysfunction (n = 1), catheter infection (n = 1), and development of multiple recurrence (n = 1). The median follow-up was 29 (range 8-166) months. Recurrences were detected in 8 patients (57%). The site of recurrences included lung (n = 1), lymph nodes (n = 1), peritoneal dissemination (n = 1), brain (n = 1), pleural (n = 1), and multiple sites (n = 3). The overall 5-year survival rate was 43%. The pathological T4 classification and the preoperative CEA ≥5 ng/mL were significant prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant HAIC after hemihepatectomy for GLM prevents remnant liver recurrence and may contribute to long-term survival.

Current management of liver metastases from gastric cancer: what is common practice? New challenge of EORTC and JCOG

The role of multidisciplinary treatment including surgery for liver metastases from gastric cancer (LMGC) is controversial. Studies to answer this clinical question are increasing in number, but all published data thus far are based on retrospective analyses with limited sample sizes. Thus, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group (GITCG) and the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Stomach Cancer Study Group (SCSG) initiated a collaboration to develop an optimal treatment strategy for LMGC. Before planning a prospective study, a questionnaire was sent out to the network members of both groups in June 2016 to clarify current common practice in each region. Sixty-seven sites from 17 countries in the EORTC network and 55 sites from Japan responded. According to the survey, for patients with resectable LMGC without extrahepatic metastases, preoperative chemotherapy followed by resection of both primary (if still in place) and liver lesions was the preferred option for both the synchronous and the metachronous setting. For patients with unresectable LMGC, most of the sites recommended chemotherapy only. In this article, the detailed results of this survey are reported, shedding light on current community practice, and a joint EORTC-JCOG strategy of investigation is delineated.

Prognostic Factors Affecting Long-Term Survival after Resection for Noncolorectal, Nonneuroendocrine, and Nonsarcoma Liver Metastases

AIM

To evaluate feasibility and long-term outcome after hepatic resection for noncolorectal, nonneuroendocrine, and nonsarcoma (NCNNNS) liver metastases in a single center.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our experience on patients who underwent surgery for NCNNNS liver metastases from 1995 to 2015. Patient baseline characteristics, tumor features, treatment options, and postoperative outcome were retrieved.

RESULTS

We included 47 patients. The overall 5-year survival (OS) rate after hepatectomy was 27.6%, with a median survival of 21 months. Overall survival was significantly longer for patients operated for nongastrointestinal liver metastases when compared with gastrointestinal (41 versus 10 months; p = 0.027). OS was significantly worse in patients with synchronous metastases than in those with metachronous disease (10 versus 22 months; p = 0.021). The occurrence of major postoperative complication negatively affected long-term prognosis (OS 23.5 versus 9.0 months; p = 0.028). Preoperative tumor characteristics (number and size of the lesions), intraoperative features (extension of resection, need for transfusions, and Pringle's maneuver), and R0 at pathology were not associated with differences in overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Liver resection represents a possible curative option for patients with NCNNNS metastases. The origin of the primary tumor and the timing of metastases presentation may help clinicians to better select which patients could take advantages from surgical intervention.

A primary tumor of mixed histological type is a novel poor prognostic factor for patients undergoing resection of liver metastasis from gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection can be an option for the treatment of metastatic liver tumors originating from gastric cancer; however, its prognostic impact is controversial. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors in patients with surgical resection of liver metastasis from gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features of 38 consecutive patients undergoing hepatectomy for metastatic tumors from gastric cancer in our institution between 1990 and 2014.

RESULTS

The median overall survival of the patients was 28 months. The 5-year survival rate was 33.9%. Primary tumors of a mixed histological type, and residual tumors during the course of treatment were identified as significant independent poor prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Histological evaluation of primary tumors may aid to identify patients suitable for undergoing surgical resection of liver metastasis from gastric cancer.