1
|
Yang X, Qiu K, Jiang Y, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Liao Y. Metabolic Crosstalk between Liver and Brain: From Diseases to Mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:7621. [PMID: 39062868 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Multiple organs and tissues coordinate to respond to dietary and environmental challenges. It is interorgan crosstalk that contributes to systemic metabolic homeostasis. The liver and brain, as key metabolic organs, have their unique dialogue to transmit metabolic messages. The interconnected pathogenesis of liver and brain is implicated in numerous metabolic and neurodegenerative disorders. Recent insights have positioned the liver not only as a central metabolic hub but also as an endocrine organ, capable of secreting hepatokines that transmit metabolic signals throughout the body via the bloodstream. Metabolites from the liver or gut microbiota also facilitate a complex dialogue between liver and brain. In parallel to humoral factors, the neural pathways, particularly the hypothalamic nuclei and autonomic nervous system, are pivotal in modulating the bilateral metabolic interplay between the cerebral and hepatic compartments. The term "liver-brain axis" vividly portrays this interaction. At the end of this review, we summarize cutting-edge technical advancements that have enabled the observation and manipulation of these signals, including genetic engineering, molecular tracing, and delivery technologies. These innovations are paving the way for a deeper understanding of the liver-brain axis and its role in metabolic homeostasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyue Yang
- Department of Endocrinology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Kangli Qiu
- Department of Endocrinology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Yaoyao Jiang
- Department of Endocrinology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Yumei Huang
- Department of Endocrinology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Yajuan Zhang
- Department of Endocrinology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| | - Yunfei Liao
- Department of Endocrinology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guo H, Sun W, Duan H, Zhang C, Wei M, Liang P, Hu X, Cao L. Preservation of the celiac branch of the vagus nerve reduces the incidence of postoperative diarrhea in gastric cancer: a cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:87. [PMID: 38582834 PMCID: PMC10998355 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03370-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes of preserving the celiac branch of the vagus nerve during laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. METHODS A total of 149 patients with prospective diagnosis of gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) combined with Billroth-II anastomosis and D2 lymph node dissection between 2017 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the preserved LADG group (P-LADG, n = 56) and the resected LADG group (R-LADG, n = 93) according to whether the vagus nerve celiac branch was preserved. We selected 56 patients (P-LADG, n = 56) with preservation of the celiac branch of the vagus nerve and 56 patients (R-LADG, n = 56) with removal of the celiac branch of the vagus nerve by propensity-matched score method. Postoperative nutritional status, weight change, short-term and long-term postoperative complications, and gallstone formation were evaluated in both groups at 5 years of postoperative follow-up. The status of residual gastritis and bile reflux was assessed endoscopically at 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS The incidence of diarrhea at 5 years postoperatively was lower in the P-LADG group than in the R-LADG group (p < 0.05). In the multivariate logistic analysis, the removal of vagus nerve celiac branch was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of postoperative diarrhea (odds ratio = 3.389, 95% confidential interval = 1.143-10.049, p = 0.028). In the multivariate logistic analysis, the removal of vagus nerve celiac branch was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of postoperative diarrhea (odds ratio = 4.371, 95% confidential interval = 1.418-13.479, p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS Preservation of the celiac branch of the vagus nerve in LADG reduced the incidence of postoperative diarrhea postoperatively in gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered with the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University in 2014 under the registration number: LCKY2014-04(X).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Guo
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China
| | - WeiFeng Sun
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China
| | - HaiTao Duan
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China
| | - Chi Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China
| | - MaoHua Wei
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China
| | - Pin Liang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China
| | - Xiang Hu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China
| | - Liang Cao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, 116011, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang B, Nie P, Lin Y, Ma Z, Ma G, Wang Y, Ma Y, Zhao J, Zhang J, Yue P, Jiang N, Zhang X, Tian L, Lu L, Yuan J, Meng W. High incidence of gallstones after Roux-en-Y reconstruction gastrectomy in gastric cancer: a multicenter, long-term cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:2253-2262. [PMID: 38320088 PMCID: PMC11020035 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Roux-en-Y reconstruction is a common anastomosis technique during gastrectomy in gastric cancer. There is a lack of studies on gallstones after Roux-en-Y reconstruction gastrectomy. This study investigated the incidence and potential risk factors associated with gallstones after Roux-en-Y reconstructive gastrectomy in gastric cancer. METHODS The study analyzed data from gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction at two hospitals between January 2014 and December 2020. The patients fall into distal and total gastrectomy groups based on the extent of gastrectomy. The cumulative event probability curve was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier, and differences in gallstone between groups were evaluated using the Log-Rank. Propensity score matching was applied to construct a balanced total versus distal gastrectomies cohort. A Cox regression was employed to analyze the risk factors for gallstones after Roux-en-Y reconstructive gastrectomy in gastric cancer. Further subgroup analysis was performed. RESULTS Five hundred thirty-one patients were included in this study, 201 in the distal gastrectomy group and 330 in the total gastrectomy. During the follow-up, gallstones occurred in 170 cases after gastrectomy, of which 145 cases accounted for 85.29% of all stones in the first two years after surgery. Then, to reduce the impact of bias, a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed on the two groups of patients. A total of 344 patients were evaluated, with each subgroup comprising 172 patients. In the matched population, the Cox regression analysis revealed that females, BMI ≥23 kg/m 2 , total gastrectomy, No.12 lymph node dissection, and adjuvant chemotherapy were risk factors for gallstones after Roux-en-Y reconstructive gastrectomy. Subgroup analysis showed that open surgery further increased the risk of gallstones after total gastrectomy. CONCLUSION The incidence of gallstones increased significantly within 2years after Roux-en-Y reconstructive gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Patients with these risk factors should be followed closely after gastrectomy to avoid symptomatic gallstones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baoping Zhang
- The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University
| | | | - Yanyan Lin
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou
| | - Zelong Ma
- The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University
| | | | | | - Yuhu Ma
- Department of Anesthesiology
| | - Jinyu Zhao
- The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University
| | - Jinduo Zhang
- The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou
| | - Ping Yue
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou
| | - Ningzu Jiang
- The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University
| | | | - Liang Tian
- The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University
| | - Linzhi Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gansu Wuwei Tumor Hospital, Wuwei, Gansu
| | - Jinqiu Yuan
- Clinical Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenbo Meng
- The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University
- Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li YT, Yuan WZ, Jin WL. Vagus innervation in the gastrointestinal tumor: Current understanding and challenges. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2023; 1878:188884. [PMID: 36990250 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.188884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
The vagus nerve (VN) is the main parasympathetic nerve of the autonomic nervous system. It is widely distributed in the gastrointestinal tract and maintains gastrointestinal homeostasis with the sympathetic nerve under physiological conditions. The VN communicates with various components of the tumor microenvironment to positively and dynamically affect the progression of gastrointestinal tumors (GITs). The intervention in vagus innervation delays GIT progression. Developments in adeno-associated virus vectors, nanotechnology, and in vivo neurobiological techniques have enabled the creation of precisely regulated "tumor neurotherapies". Furthermore, the combination of neurobiological techniques and single cell sequencing may reveal more insights into VN and GIT. The present review aimed to summarize the mechanisms of communication between the VN and the gastrointestinal TME and to explore the potential and challenges of VN-based tumor neurotherapy in GITs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Jin T, Chen ZH, Liang PP, Li ZD, He FJ, Chen ZW, Hu JK, Yang K. A Gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer patients with or without preserving celiac branches of vagus nerves: A meta-analysis. Surgery 2023; 173:375-382. [PMID: 36379744 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vagus nerve-preserving gastrectomy is increasingly popular in treating gastric cancer in the early stage, however the long and short-term outcomes after gastrectomy while preserving the celiac branch of the vagus nerve are not well defined. We aimed to summarize and compare perioperative and longer-term outcomes after celiac branch vagus nerve-preserving gastrectomy (CBP, preserving both the celiac and hepatic branches of the vagus nerve), compared to those without CBP (non-CBP, only the hepatic branch of the vagus nerve is preserved). METHODS We searched the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases for papers published before October 2021. The primary results were evaluated by short-term and long-term postoperative complications, whereas the secondary outcomes included surgery-related parameters, recovery-related parameters and overall survival. Random-effects or fixed-effects model were used to estimate odds ratio, and weighted mean difference for the outcomes. The underlying publication bias was identified via funnel charts, Begg's test and Egger's test. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by removing the research one by one. RESULTS A total of 9 studies consisting of 8 retrospective studies and one randomized control trial were included. The analysis included 1,109 patients, with 568 (51.2%) of patients receiving CBP and 541 (48.8%) patients who received non-CBP. The CBP group had a shorter time in terms of first flatus (weighted mean difference = -0.436, 95% confidence interval: -0.603 to -0.269; P < 0.001) and hospital stay (weighted mean difference = -0.456, 95% confidence interval: -0.874 to -0.037, P = 0.033) than the non-CBP group, but the time to the start of oral intake was comparable between the groups. Regarding short-term complications and surgery-related parameters, between CBP and non-CBP, no evident differences were observed in pancreatic complications, anastomotic leakage, postoperative bleeding, operation time, blood loss or lymph nodes examined. In terms of long-term complications, the incidence of gallstones in CBP was lower than that in non-CBP (odds ratio = 0.582, 95% confidence interval: 0.356-0.953, P = 0.031), and the incidence of bile reflux in CBP was lower than that in non-CBP (odds ratio = 0.473, 95% confidence interval: 0.280-0.800, P = 0.005). However, the prevalence rates of diarrhea, early dumping syndrome, esophageal reflux, and delayed gastric emptying were comparable between CBP and non-CBP. CONCLUSION The present research showed that gastric cancer patients in the early stage under CBP were superior to those without CBP in terms of incidence of gallstones, bile reflux, time of first flatus and hospital stay. Furthermore, it is imperative to conduct randomized control studies with larger sample sizes to determine the oncological survival outcomes when preserving the celiac branch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Jin
- Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Ze-Hua Chen
- Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Pan-Ping Liang
- Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Ze-Dong Li
- Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Feng-Jun He
- Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Zheng-Wen Chen
- Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Jian-Kun Hu
- Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Kun Yang
- Gastric Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Laboratory of Gastric Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, JinTang Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim TH, Kim IH, Kang SJ, Choi M, Kim BH, Eom BW, Kim BJ, Min BH, Choi CI, Shin CM, Tae CH, Gong CS, Kim DJ, Cho AEH, Gong EJ, Song GJ, Im HS, Ahn HS, Lim H, Kim HD, Kim JJ, Yu JI, Lee JW, Park JY, Kim JH, Song KD, Jung M, Jung MR, Son SY, Park SH, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Kim TY, Bae WK, Koom WS, Jee Y, Kim YM, Kwak Y, Park YS, Han HS, Nam SY, Kong SH. Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach. J Gastric Cancer 2023; 23:3-106. [PMID: 36750993 PMCID: PMC9911619 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 72.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae-Han Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea
| | - In-Ho Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Joo Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center Seoul, Seoul, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea
| | - Baek-Hui Kim
- Department of Pathology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bang Wool Eom
- Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Bum Jun Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Byung-Hoon Min
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang In Choi
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, Korea
| | - Cheol Min Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seungnam, Korea
| | - Chung Hyun Tae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Woman’s University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chung sik Gong
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Eun Jeong Gong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Geum Jong Song
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Hyeon-Su Im
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Hye Seong Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, University of Hallym College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Hyung-Don Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Joon Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Won Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Park
- Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jwa Hoon Kim
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoung Doo Song
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minkyu Jung
- Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ran Jung
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Sang-Yong Son
- Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Shin-Hoo Park
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sung Hak Lee
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Yong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Kyun Bae
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Woong Sub Koom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeseob Jee
- Department of Surgery, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Yoo Min Kim
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoonjin Kwak
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Suk Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hye Sook Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.
| | - Su Youn Nam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
| | - Seong-Ho Kong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hikage M, Hato S, Uemura K, Yura M, Sato Y, Matsushita H, Cho H, Hiki N, Kunisaki C, Inoue K, Choda Y, Boku N, Yoshikawa T, Katai H, Terashima M. Late complication after gastrectomy for clinical stage I cancer: supplementary analysis of JCOG0912. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:2958-2968. [PMID: 36512122 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09804-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Late complications following gastric cancer surgery, including postgastrectomy syndromes, are complex problems requiring a solution. Reported risk factors for developing late complications include surgery-related factors, such as the surgical approach and the extent of resection and reconstruction. However, this has not been assessed in a prospective study with a large sample size. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications. Data from the JCOG0912 trial were used. It compared laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) to open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in clinical stage I gastric cancer patients. METHODS This study included 881/921 patients enrolled in the JCOG0912 trial. The incidence of late complications was compared between the ODG and the LADG arms. In addition, associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications were assessed by multivariable analyses using the proportional odds model to identify relevant risk factors. RESULTS There was no difference in the type or number of patients with late complications between the LADG and the ODG arms. The multivariable analysis for each late complication revealed that the Billroth-I reconstruction (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a lower risk of cholecystitis [odds ratio (OR) 0.187, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.039-0.905, P = 0.037] or ileus (OR 0.116, 95%CI 0.033-0.406, P < 0.001), and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a higher risk of reflux esophagitis (OR 3.348, 95% CI 1.371-8.176, P = 0.008). The surgical approach was not a risk factor for any late complications. CONCLUSION Differences in surgical approaches did not constitute a risk for developing late complications after gastrectomy. Billroth-I reconstruction reduced the risk of ileus and cholecystitis, but pylorus-preserving gastrectomy carried a risk for reflux esophagitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Hikage
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Shinji Hato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Kohei Uemura
- JCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yura
- Gastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuya Sato
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Haruhiko Cho
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Hiki
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Chikara Kunisaki
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kentaro Inoue
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Choda
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Narikazu Boku
- Department of Oncology and General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaki Yoshikawa
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Katai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tachikawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masanori Terashima
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu H, Liu J, Xu W, Chen X. Prophylactic cholecystectomy: A valuable treatment strategy for cholecystolithiasis after gastric cancer surgery. Front Oncol 2022; 12:897853. [PMID: 36176409 PMCID: PMC9513465 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.897853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The main treatment for gastric cancer is surgical excision. Gallstones are one of the common postoperative complications of gastric cancer. To avoid the adverse effects of gallstone formation after gastric cancer surgery, we reviewed the causes and risk factors and mechanisms involved in gallstone formation after gastric cancer surgery. The evidence and value regarding prophylactic cholecystectomy (PC) during gastric cancer surgery was also reviewed. Based on previous evidence, we summarized the mechanism and believe that injury or resection of the vagus nerve or changes in intestinal hormone secretion can lead to physiological dysfunction of the gallbladder and Oddi sphincter, and the lithogenic components in the bile are also changed, ultimately leading to CL. Previous studies also have identified many independent risk factors for CL after gastric cancer, such as type of gastrectomy, reconstruction of the digestive tract, degree of lymph node dissection, weight, liver function, sex, age, diabetes and gallbladder volume are closely related to CL development. At present, there are no uniform guidelines for the selection of treatment strategies. As a new treatment strategy, PC has undeniable advantages and is expected to become the standard treatment for CL after gastric cancer in the future. The individualized PC strategy for CL after gastric cancer is the main direction of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haipeng Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Haipeng Liu,
| | - Jie Liu
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Wei Xu
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiao Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hiramatsu Y, Kikuchi H, Takeuchi H. Function-Preserving Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246223. [PMID: 34944841 PMCID: PMC8699305 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary For patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), a good prognosis is achieved by conventional standard gastrectomy with radical lymphadenectomy. However, postgastrectomy syndrome is often inevitable and results in decreased quality of life (QOL). To improve patients’ QOL, proximal gastrectomy instead of total gastrectomy and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy instead of distal gastrectomy have been widely accepted as function-preserving gastrectomies. Recently, personalized, minimized gastrectomy with sentinel node navigation surgery has been developed and is expected to be an ideal treatment option for patients with EGC. Herein, we review the indications, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes of function-preserving gastrectomy. Abstract Recently, minimally invasive (endoscopic or laparoscopic) treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) has been widely accepted. However, a standard gastrectomy with radical lymphadenectomy is generally performed in patients with EGC who have no indications for endoscopic resection, and postgastrectomy dysfunction is one of the problems of standard gastrectomy. Function-preserving gastrectomy, such as proximal gastrectomy and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy, can be considered when attempting to preserve the patient’s quality of life (QOL) postoperatively. In addition, sentinel node navigation surgery for EGC has been applied in clinical practice in several prospective studies on function-preserving personalized minimized gastrectomy. In the near future, the sentinel lymph node concept is expected to form the basis for establishing an ideal, personalized, minimally invasive function-preserving treatment for patients with EGC, which will improve their postoperative QOL without compromising their long-term survival. In this review article, we summarize the current status, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes of function-preserving gastrectomy for EGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiro Hiramatsu
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan; (Y.H.); (H.K.)
- Department of Perioperative Functioning Care and Support, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Kikuchi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan; (Y.H.); (H.K.)
| | - Hiroya Takeuchi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan; (Y.H.); (H.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-53-435-2279
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zheng Z, Liu X, Xin C, Zhang W, Gao Y, Zeng N, Li M, Cai J, Meng F, Liu D, Zhang J, Yin J, Zhang J, Zhang Z. A new technique for treating hiatal hernia with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the laparoscopic total left-side surgical approach. BMC Surg 2021; 21:361. [PMID: 34627222 PMCID: PMC8502372 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01356-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although the traditional bilateral surgical approach to treat hiatal hernia (HH) with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can provide local protection of the vagus nerve, the integrity of the entire vagus nerve cannot be evaluated. Therefore, we developed and described the total left-side surgical approach (TLSA), which theoretically reduces injury to the vagus nerve, and described the detailed surgical procedure. Methods Initially, we performed a cadaver study to explore the characteristics of the vagus nerve. Then, we prospectively evaluated the TLSA in 5 patients with HH and GERD between June 2020 and September 2020. Demographic characteristics, surgical parameters, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up findings were analyzed. Results The TLSA was successfully used in five patients (40–64 years old), and no major complications were noted. The median total operative time was 114 min, median blood loss was 50 mL, and median postoperative hospital stay was 3.8 days. Gastrointestinal function recovered within 4 days of surgery in all the patients. The 6-month follow-up gastroscopy examination showed well-established gastroesophageal flap valves. Compared with the baseline results, the 6-month follow-up results showed lower values for the total GerdQ score (12.4 vs. 6.2) and the total esophageal acid exposure time (3.48% vs. 0.38%). Based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire-stomach module 52 results, the incidence of dysphagia and flatulence decreased over time after the TLSA. Conclusions The TLSA provides a clear and broad surgical field, less trauma, and rapid recovery; moreover, it is technically simple. Although our results suggest that the TLSA provides safety and short-term efficacy and is feasible for patients with HH and GERD, long-term results from a larger clinical trial are needed to validate these findings. Trial registration ChiCTR2000034028, registration date is June 21, 2020. The study was registered prospectively
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoye Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Chenglin Xin
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Weitao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Department of Human Anatomy, School of Basic Medical Science, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Na Zeng
- National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.,Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Mengyi Li
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Fandong Meng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Liu
- Department of Ultrasonography, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Yin
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China. .,Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China. .,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China. .,Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China. .,Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China. .,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China. .,Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China.
| | - Zhongtao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Beijing, China.,National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.,Beijing Institute of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Park DJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Ryu KW, Han SU, Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Park JH, Suh YS, Kwon OK, Yoon HM, Kim W, Park YK, Kong SH, Ahn SH, Lee HJ. Short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer (the KLASS-04 trial). Br J Surg 2021; 108:1043-1049. [PMID: 34487147 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There remain concerns about the safety and functional benefit of laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LPPG) compared with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). This study evaluated short-term outcomes of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing LPPG with LDG for gastric cancer. METHODS The Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS)-04 trial was an investigator-initiated, open-label, parallel-assigned, superiority, multicentre RCT in Korea. Patients with cT1N0M0 cancer located in the middle third of the stomach at least 5 cm from the pylorus were randomized to undergo LPPG or LDG. Participants, care givers and those assessing the outcomes were not blinded to group assignment. Outcomes were 30-day postoperative morbidity rate and death at 90 days. RESULTS Some 256 patients from nine institutions were randomized (LPPG 129 patients, LDG 127 patients) between July 2015 and July 2017 and outcomes for 253 patients were analysed. Postoperative complications within 30 days were seen in 19.3 and 15.5 per cent in the LPPG and LDG groups respectively (P = 0·419). Postoperative pyloric stenosis was observed in nine (7.2 per cent) and two (1·5 per cent) patients in the LPPG and LDG groups (P = 0·026) respectively. In multivariable analysis higher BMI was a risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio 1·17, 95 per cent c.i. 1·04 to 1·32; P = 0·011). Death at 90 days was zero in both groups. CONCLUSION Postoperative complications and mortality was comparable in patients undergoing LPPG and LDG. Registration number: NCT02595086 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J Park
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Y-W Kim
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Centre, Goyang, Korea
| | - H-K Yang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - K W Ryu
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Centre, Goyang, Korea
| | - S-U Han
- Department of Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - H-H Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - W-J Hyung
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - J H Park
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Y-S Suh
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - O K Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - H M Yoon
- Department of Surgery, National Cancer Centre, Goyang, Korea
| | - W Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Y-K Park
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - S-H Kong
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - S H Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - H-J Lee
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ikegame K, Hikage M, Fujiya K, Kamiya S, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Notsu A, Terashima M. The Effect of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer on Postoperative Gallstone Formation. World J Surg 2021; 45:3378-3385. [PMID: 34389897 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06270-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallstones are known to occur quite frequently after gastrectomy. Most of the studies about postoperative cholelithiasis have focused on open gastrectomy, whereas laparoscopic gastrectomy has recently gained popularity as a type of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Hence, the efficacy of MIS in preventing post-gastrectomy gallstone formation remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of gallstone formation after MIS for clinical stage I/IIA gastric cancer. METHODS A total of 1166 patients undergoing gastrectomy for clinical stage I/IIA gastric cancer between 2009 and 2016 were included in this study. Gallstones were detected on abdominal ultrasound and/or computed tomography. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with postoperative gallstone formation. RESULTS Gallstone formation was observed in 174 patients (15%), of whom 22 (2%) experienced symptomatic cholelithiasis. In multivariate analysis, the following were identified as risk factors for post-gastrectomy gallstone formation: open approach with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.670 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.110-2.510 (P = 0.014), older age (OR 1.880; 95% CI 1.290-2.730; P < 0.001), high body mass index (OR 1.660; 95% CI 1.140-2.420; P = 0.008), Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction (OR 1.770; 95% CI 1.230-2.530; P = 0.002), hepatic branch vagotomy (OR 1.600; 95% CI 1.050-2.440; P = 0.029), and intra-abdominal infectious complications (OR 3.040; 95% CI 1.680-5.490; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our study suggested that MIS along with the preservation of the hepatic vagus nerve and non-RY reconstruction could help prevent post-gastrectomy gallstone development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ko Ikegame
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun 411-8777, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Makoto Hikage
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun 411-8777, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Keiichi Fujiya
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun 411-8777, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Kamiya
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun 411-8777, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yutaka Tanizawa
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun 411-8777, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Etsuro Bando
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun 411-8777, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Akifumi Notsu
- Clinical Research Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Masanori Terashima
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun 411-8777, Shizuoka, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kosuga T, Tsujiura M, Nakashima S, Masuyama M, Otsuji E. Current status of function-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:278-286. [PMID: 34095717 PMCID: PMC8164463 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Early gastric cancer (EGC) has excellent postoperative survival outcomes; thus, one of the recent keywords in the treatment of EGC is "function-preserving gastrectomy (FPG)." FPG reduces the extent of lymphadenectomy and gastric resection without compromising the long-term prognosis. Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is an alternative to total gastrectomy (TG) for EGC in the upper-third of the stomach, in which the gastric reservoir, gastric acid secretion, and intrinsic factors are maintained. Distal gastrectomy (DG) with a small remnant stomach, namely subtotal gastrectomy (STG), is another option for upper EGC, where the function of the cardia and fundus is preserved. Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) is a good alternative to DG for EGC in the middle-third of the stomach, where pyloric function is preserved. Following elucidation of the markedly low incidences of possible metastasis to lymph node stations where dissection is omitted, the oncological safety of these FPG procedures was clarified. Nutritional advantages of PG or STG over TG have been reported; however, the standardized reconstruction methods after PG are yet to be established, and it is important to devise methods to prevent postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and anastomotic complications regardless of the reconstruction method. Nutritional benefits of PPG compared with DG have also been clarified, in which reducing postoperative gastric stasis is important. For the further spread of these FPG procedures, several issues, such as precise evaluation of preserved function, confirmation of oncological safety, and standardization of the technique, should be addressed in future prospective randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiyuki Kosuga
- Department of SurgerySaiseikai Shiga HospitalRittoJapan
- Division of Digestive SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryKyoto Prefectural University of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | | | | | | | - Eigo Otsuji
- Division of Digestive SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryKyoto Prefectural University of MedicineKyotoJapan
| |
Collapse
|