Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: focus on late reoperation

Etiology and Management of Recurrent and Persistent Hemifacial Spasm-A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite a 90% success rate, microvascular decompression occasionally fails to resolve hemifacial spasm (HFS), necessitating revision surgery. We investigated recurrent cases to identify underlying causes.

METHODS

We evaluated patients at our institution who underwent revision microvascular decompression because of recurrent or persistent HFS, assessing recurrence causes, decompression techniques, complications, and outcomes. Data considered included demographics, preoperative symptoms, disease duration, offending vessel, and magnetic resonance findings. Surgical notes and intraoperative videos were reviewed, and telephone interviews were conducted for recent outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of our ongoing series of 493 patients, 43 patients (8.7%) required revision surgery with a patient cohort of 33 females and 10 males. The average symptom duration was 10 years. The median time between primary and revision surgery was 14 months. Thirteen patients (30.2%) underwent initial surgery elsewhere. Adhesions of Teflon pledgets to the facial nerve were the primary cause of nonresolution in 23 patients (53.5%), while in 13 (30.2%), a missed vascular compression was identified. Sixteen patients (37.2%) had sufficient decompression by removing the conflicting pledgets. During 10 revisions (23.3%), additional Teflon pledgets were necessary. After a median follow-up of 67 months after revision surgery, 27 patients (62.8%) reported complete spasm resolution. Six patients (14.0%) had a good outcome with over 90% reduction of their spasms, 3 patients (7.0%) stated a fair outcome (50% improvement), while 7 patients (16.3%) had no improvement.

CONCLUSION

According to our results, adhesions of Teflon to the facial nerve may cause HFS recurrence. Therefore, whenever possible, Teflon should be placed without nerve contact between the brainstem and the offending vessel. Using a sling or bridge technique seems to be beneficial because it leaves the facial nerve completely free. Persistent symptoms often result from missed offending vessels in the pontomedullary sulcus indicating the benefit of endoscopic inspection of this area with an endoscope.

Hemifacial Spasm Associated With the Specific Offending Vein

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hemifacial spasm (HFS) caused by venous compression is a rare occurrence. Currently, there is no relevant research on the venous characteristics and potential pathogenic mechanisms causing venous HFS. Exploring the venous characteristics in venous-type HFS may reduce the likelihood of repeated surgery.

METHODS

The authors presented 4 cases of HFS caused by veins of middle cerebellar peduncle (V. of Mid.Cer.Ped) successfully treated with microvascular decompression.

RESULTS

Based on intraoperative observations and abnormal muscle response (AMR) monitoring, it was determined that V. of Mid.Cer.Ped were offending vessels in these patients. Moreover, veins crossed between the facial and vestibulocochlear nerves, and then surrounded the ventral aspect of the facial nerve root. Microvascular decompression for the offending vessel was successfully performed, and AMR disappeared for each patient. These patients were discharged without any complications and involuntary contractions or twitching of facial muscles.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that veins can indeed induce HFS. The characteristic of the V. of Mid.Cer.Ped that leads to HFS is that these veins traverse between the facial nerve and the vestibulocochlear nerve, and then surround the ventral aspect of the facial nerve root. The dynamic influence of cerebrospinal fluid leads to pulsatile impingement of the facial nerve on the vein, resulting in facial nerve bending and deformation at the location of the vein. Significantly, in the context of surgery, if it is noticed that the V. of Mid.Cer.Ped surrounds the ventral aspect of the facial nerve root and the facial nerve is compressed and deformed, when AMR disappears after decompression of the artery, it may be necessary to perform vein decompression.

Delayed complete remission of hemifacial spasms following microvascular decompression and the implications for optimal time of revision surgery

BACKGROUND

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is an effective method for directly treating hemifacial spasms (HFS). The timing for the consideration of failed MVD and reoperation has been paradoxical.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the delayed complete remission of HFS in terms of prevalence rate, duration between surgery and delayed complete remission, and predictive factors.

METHODS

A hundred patients with HFS who underwent MVD from 2012-2021 were enrolled in the study. All HFS occurred as a result of compression of the facial nerve by adjacent blood vessels. Clinical information, intraoperative findings, and surgical outcomes were incorporated for data analysis.

RESULTS

In the first week after MVD, 67 of 100 patients achieved complete remission of HFS, while the remaining 33 had incomplete remission. In long-term follow-up, 26 individuals gradually developed delayed complete remission with a median duration of 9.1 months. Finally, 86 of 100 patients achieved complete long-term remission. Recurrent HFS and incomplete remission were found in 7 and 7 patients, respectively. Factors associated with postoperative complete remission in the first week were a severe degree of facial nerve compression (p = 0.047, OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.01-7.40), with long-term complete remission was left-sided HFS (p = 0.012, OR 5.73, 95% CI 1.47-22.36), and with the appearance of delayed complete remission was the prolonged duration of HFS at least 3 years before MVD (p = 0.046, OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.03-13.76). Transient facial paresis was found in 11% of the patients. Of them, facial nerve function recovered completely in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A delayed complete remission of HFS could be expected in long-term follow-up after MVD and is probably related to a longer duration of HFS before surgery. Unnecessary reoperation should be avoided in the early years following the first surgery.

Potential reasons for failure and recurrence in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm

BACKGROUND

To examine the factors contributing to persistent and recurrent hemifacial spasms (HFS) following a microvascular decompression (MVD) procedure and to suggest technical improvements to prevent such failures.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on fifty-two cases of repeat surgery. The extent of the previous craniotomy and the location of neurovascular compression (NVC) were investigated. The operative findings were categorized into two groups: "Missing Compression" and "Teflon Contact". The analysis included long-term outcomes and operative complications after repeat MVD procedures.

RESULTS

Missing compression was identified in 29 patients (56%), while Teflon contact was observed in 23 patients (44%). Patients with missing compression were more likely to experience improper craniotomy (66%) compared to those with Teflon contact (48%). Medially located NVC was a frequent finding in both groups, mainly due to compression by the anterior inferior cerebellar artery. In the missing compression group, during the repeat MVD, Teflon sling retraction was utilized in 79% of cases, while in the Teflon contact group, the most common procedure involved removing the Teflon in contact (65%). After the repeat MVD procedure, immediate spasm relief was achieved in 42 patients (81%), with six (12%) experiencing delayed relief. After a median follow-up of 54 months, 96% of patients were free from spasms. Delayed facial palsy, facial weakness, and hearing impairment were more frequently observed in the Teflon contact group.

CONCLUSIONS

A proper craniotomy that provides adequate exposure around the REZ is crucial to prevent missing the culprit vessel during the initial MVD procedure. Teflon contact on the REZ should be avoided, as it poses a potential risk of procedure failure and recurrence.

Reoperation for residual or recurrent hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression

PURPOSE

Microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery is the only potential curative method for hemifacial spasm (HFS). Little attention is paid to those recurrent/residual HFS cases. We want to study the potential etiology of those recurrent/residual HFS cases and evaluate the value of reoperation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed reoperation hemifacial spasm patients in our hospital. Intraoperative videos or images were carefully reviewed, and the etiology of recurrent/residual HFS is roughly divided into three categories. Intraoperative findings, surgical outcomes, and complications were carefully studied to assess the value of reoperation for recurrent/residual HFS patients.

RESULTS

A total of 28 cases were included in our case series. Twenty-three of them are recurrent HFS cases, and 5 of them are residual HFS cases. The mean follow-up duration is 24.96 months. There are seventeen patients with missed culprit vessels or insufficient decompression of root exit zone (REZ), eight patients with Teflon adhesion, and three patients with improper application of decompression materials in our case series. The final reoperation outcome with 17 excellent, seven good, and four fair, respectively. Eight (28.57%) of them experienced long-term complications after reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Re-operation for recurrent/residual HFS is an effective therapy and can achieve a higher cure rate. However, the complication rate is higher compared to the first MVD surgery. Accurately identifying REZ and proper decompression strategies to deal with the culprit vessels are very important for surgical success.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UIN: researchregistry7603. Date of registration: Jan. 31st, 2022 "retrospectively registered".

Facial Nerve Massage for the Treatment of Hemifacial Spasm Refractory to Microvascular Decompression: Outcomes and Complications

BACKGROUND

After microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS), a minority of patients realize little to no relief of spasms. In some patients, the absence of relief of spasms results from incomplete or inadequate decompression of vascular compression of the facial nerve, and these patients represent excellent candidates for repeat MVD. However, in other patients, repeat MVD is not appropriate because adequate decompression and resolution of neurovascular compression, as determined by postoperative high-resolution MRI, was achieved with the initial operation.

OBJECTIVE

To present a cohort of patients with a history of HFS refractory to MVD, with no evidence of neurovascular compression on postoperative MRI, who underwent facial nerve massage (FNM) in the posterior fossa in an attempt to relieve spasms.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with a history of incomplete relief of spasms after technically adequate MVD surgery for hemifacial spasm underwent FNM. Immediate and long-term degree of spasm relief and complications after FNM were documented through in-person or telemedicine interview.

RESULTS

At follow-up after FNM, 7 of 12 patients (58.3%) reported complete spasm relief (grade I), 2 of 12 patients (16.7%) reported >75% spasm relief (grade II), 0 patient (0%) reported >50% spasm relief (grade III), 3 of 12 (25.0%) patients reported <50% spasm relief (grade IV), and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. One patient experienced a delayed facial paresis, and another patient experienced high-frequency hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

After FNM, durable and, at least, partial relief of spasms with a relatively low complication rate was observed in most patients with HFS with incomplete relief of spasms after technically adequate prior MVD.

Intraoperative Findings of Inferior Petrosal Vein During Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: A Single-Surgeon Experience

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the impact of the inferior petrosal veins (IPVs) on operational exploration and to analyze related anatomic features.

Methods

A total of 317 patients were retrospectively studied. Surgical outcomes and postoperative complications were analyzed, and patients were divided into two groups according to whether the IPV was sacrificed or preserved. The diameter of the IPV was also recorded during operation. Furthermore, the position where the IPV drained into the jugular bulb was recorded in each patient, and the influence of different injection points on the operation was analyzed.

Results

IPVs were conclusively identified in 242/317 (76.3%) of patients, with 110/242 (45.5%) of patients categorized as “IPV sacrifice” versus 132/242 (54.5%) categorized as “IPV preservation.” IPV diameter was observed to be <0.5 mm in 58 cases (23.9%), 0.5 mm–1.0 mm (≥0.5 mm and ≤1.0 mm) in 145 cases (59.9%), and >1 mm in 39 cases (16.2%). The position of IPV drainage into the jugular bulb was at the level of the accessory nerve in 163 cases (67.3%), the level of the vagus nerve in 42 cases (17.4%), and the level of the glossopharyngeal nerve or above in 37 cases (15.3%). The diameters of IPV in the sacrifice group were mainly less than 1 mm (94.5% vs. 75%, P < 0.01), and the cases with draining points near the glossopharyngeal nerve were more than that in the preservation group (27.3% vs. 5.3%, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

IPV is an obstructive structure in MVD for HFS, with considerable variations in diameters and draining points. IPV near the glossopharyngeal nerve significantly impacts surgical exposure and is often sacrificed for a better view of the operation field. Meanwhile, it is feasible to maintain IPVs with a diameter >1 mm.

Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the most effective procedure for the long-term management of trigeminal neuralgia (TGN). However, retrospective and single-center studies are inherently biased, and there are currently no prospective, multicenter studies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes and complications in patients with TGN who underwent MVD at specialized Japanese institutions.

METHODS

We enrolled patients with TGN who underwent MVD between April 2012 and March 2015. We recorded their facial pain grade and complications at 7 d (short term), 1 yr (mid-term), and 3 yr (long term) postoperatively.

RESULTS

There were 166 patients, comprising 60 men and 106 women (mean age 62.7 yr). Furthermore, 105 patients were aged over 60 yr. We conducted neuromonitoring in 84.3% of the cases. The complete pain relief, mortality, and complication rates at the short-term follow-up were 78.9%, 0%, and 16.3%, respectively. Overall, 155 patients (93.4%) completed the long-term follow-up, with the complete pain relief and complication rates of 80.0% and 5.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the hands of experienced neurosurgeons, MVD for TGN can achieve high long-term curative effects. In addition, complications are uncommon and usually transient. Our results indicate that MVD is an effective and safe treatment for patients with TGN, including elderly patients.

Is the pre-operative lateral spread response on facial electromyography a valid diagnostic tool for hemifacial spasm?

The lateral spread response (LSR) on preoperative facial electromyogram (EMG) is a useful tool in evaluating patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS). There may be some instances where the LSR does not appear on the preoperative EMG, thus disrupting the diagnosis and treatment of HFS. In this study, we evaluated the patients who did not exhibit LSR on preoperative EMG but underwent microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm. We searched for patients who underwent MVD for HFS but had an absence of LSR on preoperative EMG between January 2016 and June 2018. Surgical outcomes were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Follow-up facial EMG was performed 3 months after surgery. Results were divided into two categories: (1) spasm relief within 24 h of surgery and (2) spasm was observed immediately post-operation. The following parameters were analyzed when comparing between the two groups: age, sex, affected side, duration of symptoms, and offending vessel(s). A total of 306 patients underwent MVD for HFS during the study period. Among them, 13 (4.2%) patients had no LSR on preoperative EMG. Eight patients (61.5%) were female and five patients were male. The 13 patients had a mean age of 51 years. All patients exhibited probable offending vessels in the root exit zone (REZ) of the facial nerve on preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging that was confirmed during surgery. Seven patients were free of HFS immediately after surgery, though six patients were not. Only one (7.7%) patient had persisted symptom 6 months after surgery. No patients experienced recurrence of spasm, nor exhibited abnormal waves on follow-up facial EMG. LSR on facial EMG is a valuable tool for evaluating hemifacial spasm. However, although LSR did not appear on preoperative EMG, if the patient presents with typical symptoms and the offending vessels are identified on MRI, we expect good results after MVD for HFS.

Efficacy and Complications of Microsurgical Neurovascular Decompression in 55 Patients With Hemifacial Spasm

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy and complications of microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Regional hospital.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with hemifacial spasm were treated by microvascular decompression. All patients with hemifacial spasm who underwent retrosigmoid microvascular decompression from May 2004 to January 2017 were included. Patients with no conflict on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging or with an alternate diagnosis were excluded.

RESULTS

The overall cure rate was 83.64%, with an average follow-up of 7.4 years. A left-sided hemifacial spasm was a healing-promoting factor (P = .01). The median healing was 0.03 months, and the mean was 6 months. The efficacy remained high in the medium term (88% at 3 years), long term (90.24% at 5 years), and very long term (90.48% at 8 years). The recurrence rate was 9.8%. Favorable criteria included a right-sided spasm (P = .01) and an average age of 62 years (P = .03). The specific complications were permanent facial palsy (3.63%), unilateral deafness (5.45%), and hearing loss (3.63%). No death was reported. Regarding the quality of life of the patients, 94.7% had a modified HFS-8 postoperative score of 0 (Hemifacial Spasm 8 Quality of Life Scale).

CONCLUSION

Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm is an effective and lasting technique. Its low rate of complications and the considerable quality-of-life improvement should lead surgeons to propose it to patients as soon as botulinum toxin injections become ineffective or poorly tolerated.

Surgical Outcomes of Revision Microvascular Decompression for Persistent or Recurrent Hemifacial Spasm After Surgery: Analysis of Radiologic and Intraoperative Findings

OBJECTIVES

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the treatment of choice for hemifacial spasm (HFS), due to the high rate of complete resolution associated with MVD. However, some patients experience recurrent or persistent symptoms after surgery. In this study, we evaluated the causes of recurrence or failure based on our surgical experience with revision of MVD for HFS and analyzed the relationship between surgical outcomes and radiologic and intraoperative findings.

METHODS

Among more than 2500 patients who underwent MVD surgery for HFS, 23 patients received a second MVD in our hospital from January 2002 to December 2017. Three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and reconstructed imaging were used to identify the culprit vessel and its conflict on the root exit zone (REZ) of the facial nerve. We reviewed patients' medical records and operation videos to identify the missing points of first surgery.

RESULTS

In our experience with revision of MVD, 8 patients had incomplete decompression, such as single-vessel decompression of multiple offending vessels. Teflon was not detected at the REZ but was found in other locations in 12 patients. Three patients had severe adhesion with previous Teflon around the REZ. Nineteen patients had excellent surgical outcomes at immediate postoperative evaluation; 20 patients showed spasm disappearance at 1 year after surgery and 3 patients showed persistent symptoms. Neurovascular contacts around the REZ of the facial nerve were revealed on magnetic resonance imaging of incomplete decompression and Teflon malposition patient groups. There were no clear neurovascular contacts in the patients with severe Teflon adhesion.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision regarding secondary MVD for persistent or recurrent spasm is troubling. However, if neurovascular contact was observed in the MRI of the patient and there were offending vessels, the surgical outcome might be favorable.

Hemifacial Spasm Caused by Vascular Compression in the Cisternal Portion of the Facial Nerve: Report of Two Cases with Review of the Literature

Although primary hemifacial spasm (HFS) is mostly related to a vascular compression of the facial nerve at its root exit zone (REZ), its occurrence in association with distal, cisternal portion has been repeatedly reported during the last two decades. We report two patients with typical HFS caused by distal neurovascular compression, in which the spasm was successfully treated with microvascular decompression (MVD). Vascular compression of distal, cisternal portion of the facial nerve was identified preoperatively in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It was confirmed again with intraoperative findings of compression of cisternal portion of the facial nerve by the meatal loop of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) and absence of any offending vessel in the REZ of the facial nerve. Immediate disappearance of lateral spread response (LSR) after decompression and resolution of spasm after the operation again validated that HFS in the current patients originated from the vascular compression of distal, cisternal portion of the facial nerves. According to our literature review of 64 patients with HFS caused by distal neurovascular compression, distal compression can be classified by pure distal neurovascular compression (31 cases, 48.4%) and double compression (both distal segment and the REZ of the facial nerves, 33 cases [51.6%]) according to the presence or absence of simultaneous offender in the REZ. Eighty-four percent of 64 identified distal offenders were the AICA, especially its meatal and postmeatal segments. Before awareness of distal neurovascular compression causing HFS and sophisticated MRI imaging (before 2000), the rate of reoperation was high (58%). Preoperative MRI and intraoperative monitoring of LSR seems to be an essential element in determination of real offending vessel in MVD caused by distal offender.

Hemifacial Spasm Caused by Veins Confirmed by Intraoperative Monitoring of Abnormal Muscle Response

Background

Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a benign disease caused by the hyper excitement of facial nerves owing to vessel compression. The offending vessels are usually arteries, such as anterior and posterior inferior cerebellar or vertebral arteries, but there are few reports of vein involvement cases.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate veins as offending vessels in patients with HFS confirmed by abnormal muscle response (AMR).

Methods

We analyzed 5 patients with HFS caused by veins among 78 patients with HFS over the past 10 years. All patients underwent microvascular decompression (MVD) with AMR monitoring, whereas 3 of them underwent a second MVD. The mean follow-up time was 97 months.

Results

Arteries were thoroughly decompressed in 3 patients with a failed first MVD surgery who received a second surgery, during which veins at the root exit point (RExP) were decompressed with the disappearance or a significant decrease in the amplitude of AMR. Two patients showed spasm resolution after the first surgery when veins were decompressed together with the disappearance of AMR. The location of veins was RExP and the cisternal portion. All patients had excellent outcomes within 3 months, and no complications were observed.

Conclusions

Veins can be offending vessels in HFS patients. AMR is useful to determine the endpoint in these cases. Once arteries are decompressed thoroughly with residual AMR, surrounding veins at unusual sites, such as the RExP or the cisternal portion, must be checked to prevent persistent HFS. Complete decompression of veins leads to a good clinical outcome.

Long-Term Outcome of Repeat Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm

OBJECTIVE

Although repeat microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS) in patients with failed prior MVD is potentially curative, little is known about the long-term results of repeat MVD. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and complications after repeat MVD for HFS.

METHODS

We performed repeat MVD on 78 consecutive patients who had undergone a prior MVD >1 year previously. Follow-up data were available for 58 patients, with a median follow-up period of 8.6 years (range, 6.9-10.2 years). The patients were assessed for intraoperative findings, relief results, and complications at discharge and at follow-up, as well as the associations between the preoperative characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

At discharge, of 78 patients with repeat MVD, 72 (92.3%) achieved complete spasm resolution and 1 (2.6%) had significantly improved spasm resolution. Of all patients, 9% (7 of 78) presented short-term complications, including partial hearing loss, hemifacial paresis, and cerebrospinal fluid leak. At follow-up, 45 of 58 (77.6%) patients had complete relief and 10 of 58 (17.2%) had improved relief. Permanent complications occurred in 14 patients (24.1%), with partial hearing loss and mild hemifacial paresis being the most common. Despite the complications, 51 of 58 patients (91.4%) reported an excellent life quality. No significant correlation was found between preoperative characteristics, such as age, interval to prior MVD, or interval to recurrence, and outcomes including short-term or long-term relief results and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat MVD provides lasting relief for most patients with persistent or recurrent HFS, albeit with a relatively high complication rate.

Surgical Treatment of Hemifacial Spasm Caused by the Compression of Internal Auditory Canal of Facial Nerve

OBJECTIVE

To make out the way to distinguish the offending vessels compressed the internal auditory canal part of the facial nerve.

METHODS

The hemifacial spasm patients were treated of microvascular decompression surgery with neurophysiologic monitoring. The patients were found that the internal auditory canal of the facial nerves was fully compressed, and the records of surgery monitoring were analyzed.

RESULTS

All the patients were recorded the delay incubation period in electromyography monitoring, and all patients were hemifacial spasm free finally.

CONCLUSION

Some hemifacial spasms were caused by internal auditory canal compression, so during the operation, the authors should explore the whole course of the facial nerve and compress the internal auditory canal part with the aid of neurophysiologic monitoring.

Failed microvascular decompression surgery for hemifacial spasm: a retrospective clinical study of reoperations

BACKGROUND

To investigate the repeat microvascular decompression on hemifacial spasm patients who failed the first MVD.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients underwent late redo MVD in our institution from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. The clinical features, surgical findings, outcomes, and complications of the repeat MVD were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (92.3 %) patients were cured immediately after the redo MVD. Delayed relief was found in two (7.7 %) patients; it took 6 days and 2 weeks for them to obtain complete relief. No recurrence was found during follow-up. Surgical complications including three (11.5 %) facial paralysis and one (3.8 %) hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggested that repeat MVD can be performed 2 years after the first MVD if the spasm was not resolved. Repeat MVD for HFS is effective.

Microvascular Decompression Surgery for Hemifacial Spasm

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the operative efficacy, surgical complication rate, and surgical strategy of microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS).

METHODS

Clinical data of 46 patients with HFS who underwent MVD were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

During surgery, it was found that the facial nerve root exit zone was compressed by the following arterial vessels: anterior inferior cerebellar artery in 24 patients (52.17%); posterior inferior cerebellar artery in 14 patients (30.43%); vertebral artery and a small artery in 7 patients (15.22%); and vertebral artery in 1 patient (2.18%). Symptoms of 38 patients were immediately remitted completely after surgery and symptoms of 8 patients were significantly reduced. Main complications included dizziness and tinnitus in 9 patients, hearing loss in 5 patients, cerebrospinal fluid leakage in 1 patient, and infection in 2 patients. No patient died during surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

MVD is the preferred choice for treating idiopathic hemifacial spasm, and hearing impairment is the main complication. Skilled microsurgical techniques, as well as identifying and completely decompressing offending vessels, are the key to ensuring a successful microvascular decompression.

Teflon Might Be a Factor Accounting for a Failed Microvascular Decompression in Hemifacial Spasm: A Technical Note

BACKGROUND

Although Teflon is widely adopted for microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery, it has never been addressed for failure analysis. This study analyzed the reasons for failed MVDs with emphasis on the Teflon sponge.

METHODS

Among the 685 hemifacial spasm cases between 2010 and 2014, 31 were reoperated on within a week because of unsatisfactory outcome, which was focused on in this study. Intraoperative findings regarding Teflon inserts of these repeat MVDs were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among the 38 without satisfactory outcomes, 31 underwent repeat MVDs, and they were all spasm free afterwards. Eventually, the final cure rate was 99.2%. It was found in the repeat MVDs that the failure was attributable to the Teflon insert in most of the cases (74.2%) directly or indirectly. It was caused by improper placement (47.8%), inappropriate size (34.8%) and unsuitable shape (17.4%) of the Teflon sponge.

CONCLUSION

Although it is not difficult for an experienced neurosurgeon to discover a neurovascular conflict during the MVD process, the size, shape and location of the Teflon sponge should not be ignored. Basically, the Teflon insert is used to keep the offending artery away from the facial nerve root rather than to isolate it. Therefore, the ideal Teflon sponge should be just small enough to produce a neurovascular separation.

Reappearance of Cranial Nerve Dysfunction Symptoms Caused by New Artery Compression More than 20 Years after Initially Successful Microvascular Decompression: Report of Two Cases

Reappearance of symptoms of cranial nerve dysfunction is not uncommon after successful microvascular decompression (MVD). The purpose of this study was to report two quite unusual cases of recurrent and newly developed hemifacial spasm (HFS) caused by a new conflicting artery more than 20 years after the first successful surgery. In Case 1, the first MVD was performed for HFS caused by the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) when the patient was 38 years old. After 26 symptom-free years, HFS recurred on the same side of the face due to compression by the newly developed offending AICA. In Case 2, the patient was first operated on for trigeminal neuralgia by transposition of the AICA at 49 years old, but 20 symptom-free years after the first MVD, a new offending PICA compressed the facial nerve on the same side, causing HFS. These two patients underwent reoperation and gained satisfactory results postoperatively. Reappearance of symptoms related to compression of the root exit zone (REZ) by a new offending artery after such a long symptom-free interval since the first effective MVD is rare. Here, we describe two such unusual cases and discuss how to manage and prevent such reappearance of symptoms after a long time interval.

Indications and Timings of Re-operation for Residual or Recurrent Hemifacial Spasm after Microvascular Decompression: Personal Experience and Literature Review

We reviewed reports about the postoperative course of hemifacial spasm (HFS) after microvascular decompression (MVD), including in our own patients, and investigated treatment for delayed resolution or recurrence of HFS. Symptoms of HFS disappear after surgery in many patients, but spasm persists postoperatively in about 10-40%. Residual spasm also gradually decreases, with rates of 1-13% at 1 year postoperatively. However, because delayed resolution is uncommon after 1 year postoperatively, the following is advised: (1) In patients with residual spasms after 1 year postoperatively (incomplete cure) or who again experience spasm ≥ 1 year postoperatively (recurrence), re-operation is recommended if the spasms are worse than before MVD. (2) When re-operation is considered, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and intraoperative videos should be reviewed to ensure that no compression due to a small artery or vein was missed, and to confirm that adhesions with the prosthesis are not causing compression. If any suspicious findings are identified, the cause must be eliminated. Moreover, because of the risk of nerve injury, decompression of the distal portion of the facial nerve should be performed only in patients in whom distal compression is strongly suspected to be the cause of symptoms. (3) Cure rates after re-operation are high, but complications such as hearing impairment and facial weakness have been reported in 10-20% of cases, so surgery must be performed with great care.

MRI findings in patients with a history of failed prior microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: how to image and where to look

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A minority of patients who undergo microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm do not improve after the first operation. We sought to determine the most common locations of unaddressed neurovascular contact in patients with persistent or recurrent hemifacial spasm despite prior microvascular decompression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with a history of a microvascular decompression presented with persistent hemifacial spasm. All patients underwent thin-section steady-state free precession MR imaging. Fourteen patients underwent repeat microvascular decompression at our institution. Images were evaluated for the following: the presence of persistent vascular compression of the facial nerve, type of culprit vessel (artery or vein), name of the culprit artery, segment of the nerve in contact with the vessel, and location of the point of contact relative to the existing surgical pledget. The imaging findings were compared with the operative findings.

RESULTS

In 12 of the 18 patients (67%), persistent vascular compression was identified by imaging. In 11 of these 12 patients, the culprit vessel was an artery. Compression of the attached segment (along the ventral surface of the pons) was identified in most patients (58%, 7/12). The point of contact was proximal to the surgical pledget in most patients (83%, 10/12). The imaging interpretation was concordant with the surgical results regarding artery versus vein in 86% of cases and regarding the segment of the nerve contacted in 92%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with persistent hemifacial spasm despite microvascular decompression, the unaddressed vascular compression is typically proximal to the previously placed pledget, usually along the attached segment of the nerve. Re-imaging with high-resolution T2-weighted MR imaging will usually identify the culprit vessel.

Hemifacial spasm and neurovascular compression

Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is characterized by involuntary unilateral contractions of the muscles innervated by the ipsilateral facial nerve, usually starting around the eyes before progressing inferiorly to the cheek, mouth, and neck. Its prevalence is 9.8 per 100,000 persons with an average age of onset of 44 years. The accepted pathophysiology of HFS suggests that it is a disease process of the nerve root entry zone of the facial nerve. HFS can be divided into two types: primary and secondary. Primary HFS is triggered by vascular compression whereas secondary HFS comprises all other causes of facial nerve damage. Clinical examination and imaging modalities such as electromyography (EMG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are useful to differentiate HFS from other facial movement disorders and for intraoperative planning. The standard medical management for HFS is botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections, which provides low-risk but limited symptomatic relief. The only curative treatment for HFS is microvascular decompression (MVD), a surgical intervention that provides lasting symptomatic relief by reducing compression of the facial nerve root. With a low rate of complications such as hearing loss, MVD remains the treatment of choice for HFS patients as intraoperative technique and monitoring continue to improve.