1
|
Schep DG, Vansantvoort J, Dayes I, Lukka H, Quan K, Kapoor A, Chow T, Chu W, Swaminath A. Evaluation of Volumetric Response Assessment From SABR for Renal Cell Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:832-837. [PMID: 38092258 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE SABR is increasingly used to treat renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the optimal method to assess treatment response is unclear. We aimed to quantify changes in both volume and maximum linear size of tumors after SABR and evaluate the utility of the 2 approaches in treatment response assessment. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively studied patients with RCC treated with SABR at our institution between 2013 and 2020. All available follow-up computed tomography scans were aligned, and tumors were contoured on all scans. Volume and maximum linear size were measured at each follow-up, relative to these measurements at the time of computed tomography simulation. RESULTS Twenty-four patients with 25 tumors were included. Median follow-up was 32 months (range, 16-67). Nineteen tumors (76%) had 30% volumetric response at a median time of 7 months after SABR, and 12 tumors (48%) had 30% decrease in maximum linear size at a median time of 16 months. Eighteen tumors (72%) decreased in volume on first follow-up scan and continued to shrink, and 5 tumors (20%) displayed transient growth after SABR (average 24% increase in volume). Compared with T1a tumors, T1b or larger tumors were more likely to have transient growth (8% vs 33%; P = .16) and had higher average relative volume 24 months after SABR (0.47 vs 0.8; P = .022). CONCLUSIONS Volume measurement results in more pronounced and earlier change compared with linear size measurement when assessing response to SABR. These findings may provide guidance when assessing treatment response for patients with RCC treated with SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Schep
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Ian Dayes
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Himanshu Lukka
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kimmen Quan
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anil Kapoor
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tom Chow
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - William Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao J, Vaios E, Wang Y, Yang Z, Cui Y, Reitman ZJ, Lafata KJ, Fecci P, Kirkpatrick J, Fang Yin F, Floyd S, Wang C. Dose-Incorporated Deep Ensemble Learning for Improving Brain Metastasis Stereotactic Radiosurgery Outcome Prediction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00505-4. [PMID: 38615888 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a novel deep ensemble learning model for accurate prediction of brain metastasis (BM) local control outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 114 brain metastases (BMs) from 82 patients were evaluated, including 26 BMs that developed biopsy-confirmed local failure post-SRS. The SRS spatial dose distribution (Dmap) of each BM was registered to the planning contrast-enhanced T1 (T1-CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Axial slices of the Dmap, T1-CE, and planning target volume (PTV) segmentation (PTVseg) intersecting the BM center were extracted within a fixed field of view determined by the 60% isodose volume in Dmap. A spherical projection was implemented to transform planar image content onto a spherical surface using multiple projection centers, and the resultant T1-CE/Dmap/PTVseg projections were stacked as a 3-channel variable. Four Visual Geometry Group (VGG-19) deep encoders were used in an ensemble design, with each submodel using a different spherical projection formula as input for BM outcome prediction. In each submodel, clinical features after positional encoding were fused with VGG-19 deep features to generate logit results. The ensemble's outcome was synthesized from the 4 submodel results via logistic regression. In total, 10 model versions with random validation sample assignments were trained to study model robustness. Performance was compared with (1) a single VGG-19 encoder, (2) an ensemble with a T1-CE MRI as the sole image input after projections, and (3) an ensemble with the same image input design without clinical feature inclusion. RESULTS The ensemble model achieved an excellent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC: 0.89 ± 0.02) with high sensitivity (0.82 ± 0.05), specificity (0.84 ± 0.11), and accuracy (0.84 ± 0.08) results. This outperformed the MRI-only VGG-19 encoder (sensitivity: 0.35 ± 0.01, AUCROC: 0.64 ± 0.08), the MRI-only deep ensemble (sensitivity: 0.60 ± 0.09, AUCROC: 0.68 ± 0.06), and the 3-channel ensemble without clinical feature fusion (sensitivity: 0.78 ± 0.08, AUCROC: 0.84 ± 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Facilitated by the spherical image projection method, a deep ensemble model incorporating Dmap and clinical variables demonstrated excellent performance in predicting BM post-SRS local failure. Our novel approach could improve other radiation therapy outcome models and warrants further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingtong Zhao
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eugene Vaios
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yuqi Wang
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zhenyu Yang
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Kyle J Lafata
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter Fecci
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Scott Floyd
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ortiz de Mendivil A, Martín-Medina P, García-Cañamaque L, Jiménez-Munarriz B, Ciérvide R, Diamantopoulos J. Challenges in radiological evaluation of brain metastases, beyond progression. RADIOLOGIA 2024; 66:166-180. [PMID: 38614532 DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
MRI is the cornerstone in the evaluation of brain metastases. The clinical challenges lie in discriminating metastases from mimickers such as infections or primary tumors and in evaluating the response to treatment. The latter sometimes leads to growth, which must be framed as pseudo-progression or radionecrosis, both inflammatory phenomena attributable to treatment, or be considered as recurrence. To meet these needs, imaging techniques are the subject of constant research. However, an exponential growth after radiotherapy must be interpreted with caution, even in the presence of results suspicious of tumor progression by advanced techniques, because it may be due to inflammatory changes. The aim of this paper is to familiarize the reader with inflammatory phenomena of brain metastases treated with radiotherapy and to describe two related radiological signs: "the inflammatory cloud" and "incomplete ring enhancement", in order to adopt a conservative management with close follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Ortiz de Mendivil
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Sección de Neurorradiología, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
| | - P Martín-Medina
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Sección de Neurorradiología, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - B Jiménez-Munarriz
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Ciérvide
- Servicio de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Williams MM, Sohrabi AK, Kittel CA, White JJ, Cramer CK, Lanier CM, Ruiz J, Xing F, Li W, Whitlow CT, Tatter SB, Chan MD, Laxton AW. Delayed Imaging Changes 18 Months or Longer After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: Necrosis or Progression. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e453-e458. [PMID: 37865197 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Imaging changes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can occur for years after treatment, although the available data on the incidence of tumor progression and adverse radiation effects (ARE) are generally limited to the first 2 years after treatment. METHODS A single-institution retrospective review was conducted of patients who had >18 months of imaging follow-up available. Patients who had ≥1 metastatic brain lesions treated with Gamma Knife SRS were assessed for the time to radiographic progression. Those with progression ≥18 months after the initial treatment were included in the present study. The lesions that progressed were characterized as either ARE or tumor progression based on the tissue diagnosis or imaging characteristics over time. RESULTS The cumulative incidence of delayed imaging radiographic progression was 35% at 5 years after the initial SRS. The cumulative incidence curves of the time to radiographic progression for lesions determined to be ARE and lesions determined to be tumor progression were not significantly different statistically. The cumulative incidence of delayed ARE and delayed tumor progression was 17% and 16% at 5 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that the number of metastatic brain lesions present at the initial SRS was the only factor associated with late radiographic progression. CONCLUSIONS The timing of late radiographic progression does not differ between ARE and tumor progression. The number of metastatic brain lesions at the initial SRS is a risk factor for late radiographic progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle M Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Arian K Sohrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carol A Kittel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jaclyn J White
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christina K Cramer
- Department of Medicine (Hematology & Oncology), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Claire M Lanier
- Department of Medicine (Hematology & Oncology), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jimmy Ruiz
- Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Fei Xing
- Department of Pathology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Wencheng Li
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher T Whitlow
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stephen B Tatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael D Chan
- Department of Medicine (Hematology & Oncology), Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Adrian W Laxton
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Romano A, Moltoni G, Blandino A, Palizzi S, Romano A, de Rosa G, De Blasi Palma L, Monopoli C, Guarnera A, Minniti G, Bozzao A. Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: Challenges in Imaging Interpretation after Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5092. [PMID: 37894459 PMCID: PMC10605307 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has transformed the management of brain metastases by achieving local tumor control, reducing toxicity, and minimizing the need for whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). This review specifically investigates radiation-induced changes in patients treated for metastasis, highlighting the crucial role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of treatment response, both at very early and late stages. The primary objective of the review is to evaluate the most effective imaging techniques for assessing radiation-induced changes and distinguishing them from tumor growth. The limitations of conventional imaging methods, which rely on size measurements, dimensional criteria, and contrast enhancement patterns, are critically evaluated. In addition, it has been investigated the potential of advanced imaging modalities to offer a more precise and comprehensive evaluation of treatment response. Finally, an overview of the relevant literature concerning the interpretation of brain changes in patients undergoing immunotherapies is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Romano
- NESMOS Department, U.O.C. Neuroradiology “Sant’Andrea” University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (G.M.); (A.B.); (S.P.); (A.R.); (G.d.R.); (L.D.B.P.); (C.M.); (A.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Giulia Moltoni
- NESMOS Department, U.O.C. Neuroradiology “Sant’Andrea” University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (G.M.); (A.B.); (S.P.); (A.R.); (G.d.R.); (L.D.B.P.); (C.M.); (A.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Antonella Blandino
- NESMOS Department, U.O.C. Neuroradiology “Sant’Andrea” University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (G.M.); (A.B.); (S.P.); (A.R.); (G.d.R.); (L.D.B.P.); (C.M.); (A.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Serena Palizzi
- NESMOS Department, U.O.C. Neuroradiology “Sant’Andrea” University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (G.M.); (A.B.); (S.P.); (A.R.); (G.d.R.); (L.D.B.P.); (C.M.); (A.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Allegra Romano
- NESMOS Department, U.O.C. Neuroradiology “Sant’Andrea” University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (G.M.); (A.B.); (S.P.); (A.R.); (G.d.R.); (L.D.B.P.); (C.M.); (A.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Giulia de Rosa
- NESMOS Department, U.O.C. Neuroradiology “Sant’Andrea” University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (G.M.); (A.B.); (S.P.); (A.R.); (G.d.R.); (L.D.B.P.); (C.M.); (A.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Lara De Blasi Palma
- NESMOS Department, U.O.C. Neuroradiology “Sant’Andrea” University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (G.M.); (A.B.); (S.P.); (A.R.); (G.d.R.); (L.D.B.P.); (C.M.); (A.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Cristiana Monopoli
- NESMOS Department, U.O.C. Neuroradiology “Sant’Andrea” University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (G.M.); (A.B.); (S.P.); (A.R.); (G.d.R.); (L.D.B.P.); (C.M.); (A.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Alessia Guarnera
- NESMOS Department, U.O.C. Neuroradiology “Sant’Andrea” University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (G.M.); (A.B.); (S.P.); (A.R.); (G.d.R.); (L.D.B.P.); (C.M.); (A.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00138 Rome, Italy
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bozzao
- NESMOS Department, U.O.C. Neuroradiology “Sant’Andrea” University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy; (A.R.); (G.M.); (A.B.); (S.P.); (A.R.); (G.d.R.); (L.D.B.P.); (C.M.); (A.G.); (A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zarkar A, Henderson D, Carver A, Heyes G, Harrop V, Tutill S, Kilkenny J, Marshall A, Elbeltagi N, Howard H. First UK patient cohort treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for primary kidney cancer. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:464-472. [PMID: 37334027 PMCID: PMC10268573 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a promising non-invasive ablative treatment option. A prospective interventional clinical trial published showed that treatment was feasible and well tolerated. We present the first single-institution UK cohort of patients with primary RCC receiving protocol-based SABR with prospective follow-up. We also present a protocol that could be used to facilitate more widespread use of the treatment. Materials and methods Nineteen biopsy-proven primary RCC patients were treated with either 42 Gy in three fractions on alternate days or 26 Gy in a single fraction based on predefined eligibility criteria using either Linear Accelerator or CyberKnife platform. Prospective toxicity data using CTCAE V4.0 and outcome data such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and tumour response using CT thorax, abdomen and pelvis (CT-TAP) were collected at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post treatment. Results The 19 patients had a median age of 76 years (interquartile range [IQR] 64-82 years) and 47.4% were males, and they had a median tumour size of 4.5 cm (IQR 3.8-5.2 cm). Single and fractionated treatment was well tolerated and there were no significant acute side effects. The mean drop from baseline in eGFR at 6 months was 5.4 ml/min and that at 12 months was 8.7 ml/min. The overall local control rate at both 6 and 12 months was 94.4%. Overall survival at 6 and 12 months was 94.7% and 78.3%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17 months, three patients experienced a Grade 3 toxicity, which was resolved with conservative management. Conclusion SABR for primary RCC is a safe and feasible treatment for medically unfit patients, which can be delivered in most UK cancer centres using standard Linear Accelerator as well as CyberKnife platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Zarkar
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Dan Henderson
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Antony Carver
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Geoff Heyes
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Victoria Harrop
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Sarah Tutill
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Julie Kilkenny
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | | | | | - Helen Howard
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Szewczyk B, Tarasek M, Campwala Z, Trowbridge R, Zhao Z, Johansen PM, Olmsted Z, Bhushan C, Fiveland E, Ghoshal G, Heffter T, Tavakkolmoghaddam F, Bales C, Wang Y, Rajamani DK, Gandomi K, Nycz C, Jeannotte E, Mane S, Nalwalk J, Burdette EC, Fischer G, Yeo D, Qian J, Pilitsis J. What happens to brain outside the thermal ablation zones? An assessment of needle-based therapeutic ultrasound in survival swine. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39:1283-1293. [PMID: 36162814 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2126901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In stereotactic radiosurgery, isodose lines must be considered to determine how surrounding tissue is affected. In thermal ablative therapy, such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), transcranial MR-guided focused ultrasound (tcMRgFUS), and needle-based therapeutic ultrasound (NBTU), how the surrounding area is affected has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE We aimed to quantify the transition zone surrounding the ablation core created by magnetic resonance-guided robotically-assisted (MRgRA) delivery of NBTU using multi-slice volumetric 2-D magnetic resonance thermal imaging (MRTI) and subsequent characterization of the resultant tissue damage using histopathologic analysis. METHODS Four swine underwent MRgRA NBTU using varying duration and wattage for treatment delivery. Serial MRI images were obtained, and the most representative were overlaid with isodose lines and compared to brain tissue acquired postmortem which underwent histopathologic analysis. These results were also compared to predicted volumes using a finite element analysis model. Contralateral brain tissue was used for control data. RESULTS Intraoperative MRTI thermal isodose contours were characterized and comprehensively mapped to post-operative MRI images and qualitatively compared with histological tissue sections postmortem. NBTU 360° ablations induced smaller lesion volumes (33.19 mm3; 120 s, 3 W; 30.05 mm3, 180 s, 4 W) versus 180° ablations (77.20 mm3, 120 s, 3 W; 109.29 mm3; 180 s; 4 W). MRTI/MRI overlay demonstrated the lesion within the proximal isodose lines. The ablation-zone was characterized by dense macrophage infiltration and glial/neuronal loss as demonstrated by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament (NF) absence and avid CD163 staining. The transition-zone between lesion and normal brain demonstrated decreased macrophage infiltration and measured ∼345 microns (n - 3). We did not detect overt hemorrhages or signs of edema in the adjacent spared tissue. CONCLUSION We successfully performed MRgRA NBTU ablation in swine and demonstrated minimal histologic changes extended past the ablation-zone. The lesion was characterized by macrophage infiltration and glial/neuronal loss which decreased through the transition-zone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Szewczyk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.,Robotics Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | - Zahabiya Campwala
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Trowbridge
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Zhanyue Zhao
- Robotics Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Phillip M Johansen
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Zachary Olmsted
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Charles Bales
- Robotics Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Yang Wang
- Robotics Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Dhruv Kool Rajamani
- Robotics Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Katie Gandomi
- Robotics Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Nycz
- Robotics Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Erin Jeannotte
- Animal Resources Facility, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Shweta Mane
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Julia Nalwalk
- Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | | | - Gregory Fischer
- Robotics Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Desmond Yeo
- GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, USA
| | - Jiang Qian
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.,Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Julie Pilitsis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.,Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA.,Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oliver PAK, Wood TR, Baldwin LN. A customizable, open-source Winston-Lutz system for multi-target, single isocentre radiotherapy. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2022; 8. [PMID: 36049388 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac8e72] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present and share an open-source system (phantom and software) for verifying the targeting accuracy of linac-based, single-isocenter, multi-target radiotherapy. This quality assurance test extends the traditional Winston-Lutz test, which considers a single target located at isocentre. APPROACH Plans for a 3D-printed phantom are provided, which can be customized to accommodate various target (BB) positions. Given BB positions and gantry/collimator/couch combinations, the software generates multi-leaf collimator positions to facilitate multi-target Winston-Lutz (MTWL) plan creation. The software determines deviations between detected and expected BB positions on MV images resulting from MTWL plan delivery. BBs are located using a Hough circle detection algorithm, which is modified to favour the detection of circles: (1) having reasonable size, (2) that are contained within the radiation field, and (3) having reasonable pixel intensities. Validation was performed in two ways: (1) using synthetic data with zero targeting errors and (2) by measuring real linac targeting errors and comparing against results obtained using a commercial system. MAIN RESULTS Validation using the synthetic data yielded a mean (maximum) absolute discrepancy of 0.11 mm (0.21 mm), which is comparable to the synthetic phantom resolution (0.2 mm). The mean (maximum) absolute discrepancy compared to the commercial system is 0.13 mm (0.43 mm). These values are similar to results obtained with repeated deliveries of the same MTWL plan with the same phantom setup. Both validation tests yield reasonable results and are therefore considered successful. The MTWL test was performed independently by three physicists on two linacs to investigate repeatability, resulting in a mean (maximum) absolute discrepancy of 0.14 mm (0.51 mm) among the various attempts. SIGNIFICANCE Successful completion of this quality assurance test, using our customizable and open-source system, provides confidence that multi-target, single isocentre radiotherapy treatments can be delivered with sufficient geometric accuracy according to the chosen tolerance level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia A K Oliver
- Dept. of Oncology, Div. of Medical Physics, University of Alberta, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, CANADA
| | - Tania R Wood
- Dept. of Medical Physics, Alberta Health Services, Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, CANADA
| | - Lesley N Baldwin
- Dept. of Oncology, Medical Physics Division, University of Alberta, 11560 University Ave, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, CANADA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Starck L, Skeie BS, Moen G, Grüner R. Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI May Contribute in Prediction of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Outcome in Brain Metastases. Neurooncol Adv 2022; 4:vdac070. [PMID: 35673606 PMCID: PMC9167634 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), predicting treatment response is not possible at an early stage using structural imaging alone. Hence, the current study aims at investigating whether dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-MRI estimated prior to SRS can provide predictive biomarkers in response to SRS treatment and characterize vascular characteristics of pseudo-progression. Methods In this retrospective study, perfusion-weighted DSC-MRI image data acquired with a temporal resolution of 1.45 seconds were collected from 41 patients suffering from brain metastases. Outcome was defined based on lesion volume changes in time (determined on structural images) or death. Motion correction and manual lesion delineation were performed prior to semi-automated, voxel-wise perfusion analysis. Statistical testing was performed using linear regression and a significance threshold at P = .05. Age, sex, primary cancers (pulmonary cancer and melanoma), lesion volume, and dichotomized survival time were added as covariates in the linear regression models (ANOVA). Results Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were found to be significantly lower prior to SRS treatment in patients with increasing lesion volume or early death post-SRS (P ≤ .01). Conclusion Unfavorable treatment outcome may be linked to low perfusion prior to SRS. Pseudo-progression may be preceded by a transient rCBF increase post-SRS. However, results should be verified in different or larger patient material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Starck
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Norway
- Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Gunnar Moen
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Renate Grüner
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Norway
- Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Trommer M, Adams A, Celik E, Fan J, Funken D, Herter JM, Linde P, Morgenthaler J, Wegen S, Mauch C, Franklin C, Galldiks N, Werner JM, Kocher M, Rueß D, Ruge M, Meißner AK, Baues C, Marnitz S. Oncologic Outcome and Immune Responses of Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-1 Treatment for Brain Metastases Regarding Timing and Benefiting Subgroups. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051240. [PMID: 35267546 PMCID: PMC8909717 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with radiotherapy (RT) are widely used for patients with brain metastasis (BM), markers that predict treatment response for combined RT and ICI (RT-ICI) and their optimal dosing and sequence for the best immunogenic effects are still under investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors for therapeutic outcome and to compare effects of concurrent and non-concurrent RT-ICI. We retrospectively analyzed data of 93 patients with 319 BMs of different cancer types who received PD-1 inhibitors and RT at the University Hospital Cologne between September/2014 and November/2020. Primary study endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC). We included 66.7% melanoma, 22.8% lung, and 5.5% other cancer types with a mean follow-up time of 23.8 months. Median OS time was 12.19 months. LC at 6 months was 95.3% (concurrent) vs. 69.2% (non-concurrent; p = 0.008). Univariate Cox regression analysis detected following prognostic factors for OS: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio NLR favoring <3 (low; HR 2.037 (1.184−3.506), p = 0.010), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) favoring ≤ULN (HR 1.853 (1.059−3.241), p = 0.031), absence of neurological symptoms (HR 2.114 (1.285−3.478), p = 0.003), RT concept favoring SRS (HR 1.985 (1.112−3.543), p = 0.019), RT dose favoring ≥60 Gy (HR 0.519 (0.309−0.871), p = 0.013), and prior anti-CTLA4 treatment (HR 0.498 (0.271−0.914), p = 0.024). Independent prognostic factors for OS were concurrent RT-ICI application (HR 0.539 (0.299−0.971), p = 0.024) with a median OS of 17.61 vs. 6.83 months (non-concurrent), ECOG performance status favoring 0 (HR 7.756 (1.253−6.061), p = 0.012), cancer type favoring melanoma (HR 0.516 (0.288−0.926), p = 0.026), BM volume (PTV) favoring ≤3 cm3 (HR 1.947 (1.007−3.763), p = 0.048). Subgroups with the following factors showed significantly longer OS when being treated concurrently: RT dose <60 Gy (p = 0.014), PTV > 3 cm3 (p = 0.007), other cancer types than melanoma (p = 0.006), anti-CTLA4-naïve patients (p < 0.001), low NLR (p = 0.039), steroid intake ≤4 mg (p = 0.042). Specific immune responses, such as abscopal effects (AbEs), pseudoprogression (PsP), or immune-related adverse events (IrAEs), occurred more frequently with concurrent RT-ICI and resulted in better OS. Other toxicities, including radionecrosis, were not statistically different in both groups. The concurrent application of RT and ICI, the ECOG-PS, cancer type, and PTV had an independently prognostic impact on OS. In concurrently treated patients, treatment response (LC) was delayed and specific immune responses (AbE, PsP, IrAE) occurred more frequently with longer OS rates. Our results suggest that concurrent RT-ICI application is more beneficial than sequential treatment in patients with low pretreatment inflammatory status, more and larger BMs, and with other cancer types than melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike Trommer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (E.C.); (J.F.); (D.F.); (J.M.H.); (P.L.); (J.M.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (S.M.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Anne Adams
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Eren Celik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (E.C.); (J.F.); (D.F.); (J.M.H.); (P.L.); (J.M.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (S.M.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
| | - Jiaqi Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (E.C.); (J.F.); (D.F.); (J.M.H.); (P.L.); (J.M.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (S.M.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
| | - Dominik Funken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (E.C.); (J.F.); (D.F.); (J.M.H.); (P.L.); (J.M.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (S.M.)
| | - Jan M. Herter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (E.C.); (J.F.); (D.F.); (J.M.H.); (P.L.); (J.M.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (S.M.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Linde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (E.C.); (J.F.); (D.F.); (J.M.H.); (P.L.); (J.M.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (S.M.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
| | - Janis Morgenthaler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (E.C.); (J.F.); (D.F.); (J.M.H.); (P.L.); (J.M.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (S.M.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (E.C.); (J.F.); (D.F.); (J.M.H.); (P.L.); (J.M.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (S.M.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
| | - Cornelia Mauch
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Cindy Franklin
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Department of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, 52428 Juelich, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniel Rueß
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Maximilian Ruge
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna-Katharina Meißner
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
- Department for General Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (E.C.); (J.F.); (D.F.); (J.M.H.); (P.L.); (J.M.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (S.M.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (E.C.); (J.F.); (D.F.); (J.M.H.); (P.L.); (J.M.); (S.W.); (C.B.); (S.M.)
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany; (C.M.); (C.F.); (N.G.); (J.-M.W.); (M.K.); (D.R.); (M.R.); (A.-K.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Salvestrini V, Greco C, Guerini AE, Longo S, Nardone V, Boldrini L, Desideri I, De Felice F. The role of feature-based radiomics for predicting response and radiation injury after stereotactic radiation therapy for brain metastases: A critical review by the Young Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (yAIRO). Transl Oncol 2021; 15:101275. [PMID: 34800918 PMCID: PMC8605350 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction differential diagnosis of tumor recurrence and radiation injury after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is challenging. The advances in imaging techniques and feature-based radiomics could aid to discriminate radionecrosis from progression. Methods we performed a systematic review of current literature, key references were obtained from a PubMed query. Data extraction was performed by 3 researchers and disagreements were resolved with a discussion among the authors. Results we identified 15 retrospective series, one prospective trial, one critical review and one editorial paper. Radiomics involves a wide range of imaging features referred to necrotic regions, rate of contrast-enhancing area or the measure of edema surrounding the metastases. Features were mainly defined through a multistep extraction/reduction/selection process and a final validation and comparison. Conclusions feature-based radiomics has an optimal potential to accurately predict response and radionecrosis after SRT of BM and facilitate differential diagnosis. Further validation studies are eagerly awaited to confirm radiomics reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viola Salvestrini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlo Greco
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Andrea Emanuele Guerini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Università degli Studi di Brescia and ASST Spedali Civili, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, Brescia 25123, Italy.
| | - Silvia Longo
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome 00168, Italy.
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Section of Radiology and Radiotherapy, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples 80138, Italy.
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, Rome 00168, Italy.
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Radiation Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 326, Rome 00161, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hainc N, Alsafwani N, Gao A, O'Halloran PJ, Kongkham P, Zadeh G, Gutierrez E, Shultz D, Krings T, Alcaide-Leon P. The centrally restricted diffusion sign on MRI for assessment of radiation necrosis in metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 2021; 155:325-333. [PMID: 34689307 PMCID: PMC8651583 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03879-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Differentiation of radiation necrosis from tumor progression in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is challenging. For this, we assessed the performance of the centrally restricted diffusion sign. Methods Patients with brain metastases treated with SRS who underwent a subsequent intervention (biopsy/resection) for a ring-enhancing lesion on preoperative MRI between 2000 and 2020 were included. Excluded were lesions containing increased susceptibility limiting assessment of DWI. Two neuroradiologists classified the location of the diffusion restriction with respect to the post-contrast T1 images as centrally within the ring-enhancement (the centrally restricted diffusion sign), peripherally correlating to the rim of contrast enhancement, both locations, or none. Measures of diagnostic accuracy and 95% CI were calculated for the centrally restricted diffusion sign. Cohen's kappa was calculated to identify the interobserver agreement. Results Fifty-nine patients (36 female; mean age 59, range 40 to 80) were included, 36 with tumor progression and 23 with radiation necrosis based on histopathology. Primary tumors included 34 lung, 12 breast, 5 melanoma, 3 colorectal, 2 esophagus, 1 head and neck, 1 endometrium, and 1 thyroid. The centrally restricted diffusion sign was seen in 19/23 radiation necrosis cases (sensitivity 83% (95% CI 63 to 93%), specificity 64% (95% CI 48 to 78%), PPV 59% (95% CI 42 to 74%), NPV 85% (95% CI 68 to 94%)) and 13/36 tumor progression cases (difference p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was substantial, at 0.61 (95% CI 0.45 to 70.8). Conclusion We found a low probability of radiation necrosis in the absence of the centrally restricted diffusion sign.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolin Hainc
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Noor Alsafwani
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU), Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Andrew Gao
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Paul Kongkham
- Neurosurgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- Neurosurgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Enrique Gutierrez
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - David Shultz
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Timo Krings
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Paula Alcaide-Leon
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Parent EE, Patel D, Nye JA, Li Z, Olson JJ, Schuster DM, Goodman MM. [ 18F]-Fluciclovine PET discrimination of recurrent intracranial metastatic disease from radiation necrosis. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:148. [PMID: 33284388 PMCID: PMC7721921 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00739-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often the primary treatment modality for patients with intracranial metastatic disease. Despite advances in magnetic resonance imaging, including use of perfusion and diffusion sequences and molecular imaging, distinguishing radiation necrosis from progressive tumor remains a diagnostic and clinical challenge. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of 18F-fluciclovine PET to accurately distinguish radiation necrosis from recurrent intracranial metastatic disease in patients who had previously undergone SRS. METHODS Fluciclovine PET imaging was performed in 8 patients with a total of 15 lesions that had previously undergone SRS and had subsequent MRI and clinical features suspicious for recurrent disease. The SUVmax of each lesion and the contralateral normal brain parenchyma were summated and evaluated at four different time points (5 min, 10 min, 30 min, and 55 min). Lesions were characterized as either recurrent disease (11 of 15 lesions) or radiation necrosis (4 of 15 lesions) and confirmed with histopathological correlation (7 lesions) or through serial MRI studies (8 lesions). RESULTS Time activity curve analysis found statistically greater radiotracer accumulation for all lesions, including radiation necrosis, when compared to contralateral normal brain. While the mean and median SUVmax for recurrent disease were statistically greater than those of radiation necrosis at all time points, the difference was more significant at the earlier time points (p = 0.004 at 5 min-0.025 at 55 min). Using a SUVmax threshold of ≥ 1.3, fluciclovine PET demonstrated a 100% accuracy in distinguishing recurrent disease from radiation necrosis up to 30 min after injection and an accuracy of 87% (sensitivity = 0.91, specificity = 0.75) at the last time point of 55 min. However, tumor-to-background ratios (TBRmax) were not significantly different between recurrent disease and radiation necrosis at any time point due to variable levels of fluciclovine uptake in the background brain parenchyma. CONCLUSIONS Fluciclovine PET may play an important role in distinguishing active intracranial metastatic lesions from radiation necrosis in patients previously treated with SRS but needs to be validated in larger studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dhruv Patel
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1841 Clifton Rd. NE, 2nd Floor, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Jonathon A Nye
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1841 Clifton Rd. NE, 2nd Floor, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Zhuo Li
- Department of Statistics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David M Schuster
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1841 Clifton Rd. NE, 2nd Floor, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Mark M Goodman
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1841 Clifton Rd. NE, 2nd Floor, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Skeie BS, Enger PØ, Knisely J, Pedersen PH, Heggdal JI, Eide GE, Skeie GO. A simple score to estimate the likelihood of pseudoprogression vs. recurrence following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: The Bergen Criteria. Neurooncol Adv 2020; 2:vdaa026. [PMID: 32642686 PMCID: PMC7212847 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A major challenge in the follow-up of patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) is to distinguish pseudoprogression (PP) from tumor recurrence (TR). The aim of the study was to develop a clinical risk assessment score. Methods Follow-up images of 87 of 97 consecutive patients treated with SRS for 348 BM were analyzed. Of these, 100 (28.7%) BM in 48 (53.9%) patients responded with either TR (n = 53, 15%) or PP (n = 47, 14%). Differences between the 2 groups were analyzed and used to develop a risk assessment score (the Bergen Criteria). Results Factors associated with a higher incidence of PP vs. TR were as follows: prior radiation with whole brain radiotherapy or SRS (P = .001), target cover ratio ≥98% (P = .048), BM volume ≤2 cm3 (P = .054), and primary lung cancer vs. other cancer types (P = .084). Based on the presence (0) or absence (1) of these 5 characteristics, the Bergen Criteria was established. A total score <2 points was associated with 100% PP, 2 points with 57% PP and 43% TR, 3 points with 57% TR and 43% PP, whereas >3 points were associated with 84% TR and 16% PP, P < .001. Conclusion Based on 5 characteristics at the time of SRS the Bergen Criteria could robustly differentiate between PP vs. TR following SRS. The score is user-friendly and provides a useful tool to guide the decision making whether to retreat or observe at appropriate follow-up intervals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Per Øyvind Enger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jonathan Knisely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Jan Ingeman Heggdal
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Geir Egil Eide
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway.,Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Geir Olve Skeie
- Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
O'Sullivan S, McDermott R, Keys M, O'Sullivan M, Armstrong J, Faul C. Imaging response assessment following stereotactic body radiotherapy for solid tumour metastases of the spine: Current challenges and future directions. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64:385-397. [PMID: 32293114 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Patients with metastatic disease are routinely serially imaged to assess disease burden and response to systemic and local therapies, which places ever-expanding demands on our healthcare resources. Image interpretation following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine metastases can be challenging; however, appropriate and accurate assessment is critical to ensure patients are managed correctly and resources are optimised. Here, we take a critical review of the merits and pitfalls of various imaging modalities, current response assessment guidelines, and explore novel imaging approaches and the potential for radiomics to add value in imaging assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siobhra O'Sullivan
- St Luke's Institute of Cancer Research, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Ronan McDermott
- St Luke's Institute of Cancer Research, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Maeve Keys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Maeve O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - John Armstrong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Clare Faul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Palmer JD, Sebastian NT, Chu J, DiCostanzo D, Bell EH, Grecula J, Arnett A, Blakaj DM, McGregor J, Elder JB, Lu L, Zoller W, Addington M, Lonser R, Chakravarti A, Brown PD, Raval R. Single-Isocenter Multitarget Stereotactic Radiosurgery Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Multiple Brain Metastases. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 5:70-76. [PMID: 32051892 PMCID: PMC7004936 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Multiple studies have reported favorable outcomes for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of limited brain metastases. An obstacle of SRS in the management of numerous metastases is the longer treatment time using traditional radiosurgery. Single-isocenter multitarget (SIMT) SRS is a novel technique that permits rapid therapy delivery to multiple metastases. There is a lack of clinical evidence regarding its efficacy and safety. We report the outcomes of patients treated with this technique. Methods and Materials We reviewed the records of patients with intact or resected brain metastases treated with SRS in 1 to 5 fractions using SIMT technique at our institution, with at least 1 available follow-up brain magnetic resonance imaging. Survival, disease control, and toxicity were evaluated using Cox regression, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results We identified 173 patients with 1014 brain metastases. Median follow up was 12.7 months. Median beam-on time was 4.1 minutes. The median dose to the brain was 219.4 cGy. Median overall survival and freedom from intracranial progression were 13.2 and 6.3 months, respectively. Overall survival did not differ between patients treated with greater than or less than 4 lesions (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.61; P = .91). Actuarial 1- and 2-year local control were 99.0% and 95.1%, respectively. Rates of grade 2 and grade 3 or higher radionecrosis were 1.4% and 0.9%, respectively. Conclusions SIMT radiosurgery delivered in 1 to 5 fractions offers excellent local control and acceptable toxicity in the treatment of multiple intact and postoperative brain metastases. This technique should be evaluated prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio.,Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Nikhil T Sebastian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| | - Jacquline Chu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| | - Dominic DiCostanzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| | - Erica H Bell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| | - John Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| | - Andrea Arnett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| | - Dukagjin M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| | - John McGregor
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - James B Elder
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Lanchun Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| | - Wesley Zoller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| | - Mark Addington
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| | - Russell Lonser
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Raju Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Traylor JI, Habib A, Patel R, Muir M, Gadot R, Briere T, Yeboa DN, Li J, Rao G. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for local control of resected brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2019; 144:343-350. [PMID: 31313060 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03233-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been shown to establish local control in patients with resected brain metastases, yet its efficacy may be limited, particularly for resected lesions with large post-operative resection cavities. We describe the efficacy of postoperative fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for local control in patients who have undergone resection for brain metastases. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed patients who received FSRT for resected brain metastases in 3 or 5 fractions. Time to local recurrence was the primary endpoint in this study. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients (n = 29 female, n = 38 male) met study criteria for review. The median age of the cohort was 62 years (range 18-79 years). Median preoperative tumor volume was 11.1 cm3 (range 0.4-77.0 cm3). The rate of local control was 91.0% at 6 months, 85.1% at 12 months, and 85.1% at 18 months. Estimates of freedom from local recurrence at 6 and 12 months were 90.9% and 84.3%, respectively. Higher biologically equivalent doses (BED10) were found to be predictive of longer freedom from local recurrence on univariate and multivariable analysis. Larger cavity volumes were found to correspond to longer time to local recurrence on univariate and multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that postoperative FSRT may be an effective method for providing local control to the surgical bed in patients with resected brain metastases, particularly for larger tumors not amenable to conventional, single-fraction SRS. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey I Traylor
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ahmed Habib
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rajan Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew Muir
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ron Gadot
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tina Briere
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ganesh Rao
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Room FC7.2000, Unit 853, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Benson J, Burgstahler M, Zhang L, Rischall M. The value of structured radiology reports to categorize intracranial metastases following radiation therapy. Neuroradiol J 2019; 32:267-272. [PMID: 31017073 DOI: 10.1177/1971400919845365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiology descriptions of intracranial metastases following radiotherapy are often imprecise. This study sought to improve such reports by creating and disseminating a structured template that encourages discrete categorization of intracranial lesions. METHODS Following initiation of the structured template, a retrospective review assessed patients with intracranial metastases that underwent radiotherapy, comparing 'pre-template' with 'post-template' reports. A total of 139 patients were included; 94 patients (67.6%) were imaged pre-template, 45 (32.4%) post-template. Reports were assessed for discrete versus non-specific descriptions of lesions: '(presumed) new metastases', 'treated metastases', and 'indeterminate lesions'. Non-specific language was subdivided based on the type of lesion(s) described: e.g. 'stable enhancing foci' was deemed a non-specific description of 'treated metastases'. RESULTS Non-specific descriptions of lesions were used in 25/94 reports (26.6%) pre-template, and eight reports (17.8%) post-template. No significant difference was found in the frequency of inappropriate/ambiguous descriptions of intracranial lesions following template initiation (P = 0.52). However, only 27/45 (60.0%) of the reports in the post-template time period used the structured report; the other reports were written as free prose. Of the reports that did use the structured template, the authors used significantly less ambiguous language structured template (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION When utilized, a structured report template resulted in decreased non-specific descriptions and improved discrete characterization of intracranial metastases in patients treated with radiation. However, the frequency of non-specific language usage before and after template initiation was unchanged, probably due to poor compliance with template utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lei Zhang
- 3 Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fega KR, Fletcher GP, Waddle MR, Peterson JL, Ashman JB, Barrs DM, Bendok BR, Patel NP, Porter AB, Vora SA. Analysis of MRI Volumetric Changes After Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Benign Intracranial Neoplasms. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 4:43-49. [PMID: 30706009 PMCID: PMC6349623 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2017] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To quantitatively assess volumetric changes after hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HFSRT) in patients treated for vestibular schwannomas and meningiomas. Methods and materials We retrospectively reviewed records of patients treated with HFSRT at our institution from 2002 to 2014. Patients received a median dose of 25 Gy in 5 fractions. After treatment, they underwent clinical and radiologic follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3- to 12-month intervals. Gross tumor volume was outlined on each thin slice of contrast-enhanced T1 series before and on each scan after HFSRT. Volumetric changes were calculated and compared with neuroradiologist interpretations. Results Forty-three patients underwent 182 MRI scans. Tumor types included vestibular schwannoma (n = 34) and meningioma (n = 9). Median follow-up time was 29 months. Median gross tumor volume was 3.1 cm3. Local control was 81.4% for the entire cohort at the time of last follow-up. Transient volume expansion was noted in 17 patients (50%) with vestibular schwannoma and 2 (22%) with meningioma. For all patients, transient volume expansion and subsequent regression occurred at a median time of 5.5 and 12 months, respectively. Neuroradiologist agreement with regard to tumor regression, progression, or stability occurred in 155 of 182 total reports (85%). The largest discordance identified was a stable finding on the MRI interpretation when the measured volumetric change exceeded 20% (n = 24 [13%]). Conclusions HFSRT is associated with excellent local control and a low incidence of toxicity. With volumetric MRI measurement, transient volume expansion was a common finding and was associated with temporary adverse effects. Although the neuroradiologist’s interpretation generally agreed with the volumetric MRI measurement, the overall 15% discordance rate emphasizes the potential benefit of considering volumetric measurements, which may help clinicians correlate posttreatment symptoms with MRI findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn R Fega
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Mark R Waddle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | - Jonathan B Ashman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - David M Barrs
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Bernard R Bendok
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Naresh P Patel
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Alyx B Porter
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sujay A Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Peng L, Parekh V, Huang P, Lin DD, Sheikh K, Baker B, Kirschbaum T, Silvestri F, Son J, Robinson A, Huang E, Ames H, Grimm J, Chen L, Shen C, Soike M, McTyre E, Redmond K, Lim M, Lee J, Jacobs MA, Kleinberg L. Distinguishing True Progression From Radionecrosis After Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases With Machine Learning and Radiomics. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:1236-1243. [PMID: 30353872 PMCID: PMC6746307 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2018] [Revised: 12/31/2017] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment effect or radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is a common phenomenon often indistinguishable from true progression. Radiomics is an emerging field that promises to improve on conventional imaging. In this study, we sought to apply a radiomics-based prediction model to the problem of diagnosing treatment effect after SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS We included patients in the Johns Hopkins Health System who were treated with SRS for brain metastases who subsequently underwent resection for symptomatic growth. We also included cases of likely treatment effect in which lesions grew but subsequently regressed spontaneously. Lesions were segmented semiautomatically on preoperative T1 postcontrast and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging, and radiomic features were extracted with software developed in-house. Top-performing features on univariate logistic regression were entered into a hybrid feature selection/classification model, IsoSVM, with parameter optimization and further feature selection performed using leave-one-out cross-validation. Final model performance was assessed by 10-fold cross-validation with 100 repeats. All cases were independently reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist for comparison. RESULTS We identified 82 treated lesions across 66 patients, with 77 lesions having pathologic confirmation. There were 51 radiomic features extracted per segmented lesion on each magnetic resonance imaging sequence. An optimized IsoSVM classifier based on top-ranked radiomic features had sensitivity and specificity of 65.38% and 86.67%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.81 on leave-one-out cross-validation. Only 73% of cases were classifiable by the neuroradiologist, with a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 19%. CONCLUSIONS Radiomics holds promise for differentiating between treatment effect and true progression in brain metastases treated with SRS. A predictive model built on radiomic features from an institutional cohort performed well on cross-validation testing. These results warrant further validation in independent datasets. Such work could prove invaluable for guiding management of individual patients and assessing outcomes of novel interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Vishwa Parekh
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Peng Huang
- Department of Oncology-Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Division, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Doris D Lin
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Khadija Sheikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Brock Baker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Talia Kirschbaum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Francesca Silvestri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jessica Son
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Adam Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ellen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Heather Ames
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jimm Grimm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Colette Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael Soike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Emory McTyre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Kristin Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Junghoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael A Jacobs
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lawrence Kleinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
FDG PET/MRI Coregistration Helps Predict Response to Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in Patients With Brain Metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 212:425-430. [PMID: 30422717 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether relative standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements at FDG PET/MRI coregistration are predictive of local tumor control in patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of the images and clinical characteristics of a cohort of patients with brain metastases from non-CNS neoplasms treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) who underwent posttherapy FDG PET because of MRI findings concerning for progression. The PET and contrast-enhanced MR images were fused. Relative SUV measurements were calculated from ROIs placed in the area of highest FDG uptake within the enhancing lesion and in the contralateral normal-appearing white matter. Relative SUV was defined as the ratio of maximum SUV in the tumor to maximum SUV in healthy white matter. Two independent readers evaluated response to GKRS using serial posttherapy MRI performed at least 3 months after GKRS completion. The relation between relative SUV and local tumor progression was evaluated with respect to treatment effect. RESULTS Eighty-five patients (48 [56.5%] women, 37 [43.5%] men; mean age at diagnosis, 60.5 ± 11.3 years) met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-three (38.8%) lesions progressed after SRS. There was a significant association between relative SUV and local tumor control (p = 0.035). Relative SUV provided a diagnostic ROC AUC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55-0.79). CONCLUSION Quantitative relative SUV at posttherapy FDG PET serves as a biomarker of response to SRS in patients with brain metastases in cases in which lesion growth is identified at follow-up MRI. This prognostic data may affect management, supporting the need for further therapeutic actions for selected patients.
Collapse
|
22
|
Trommer-Nestler M, Marnitz S, Kocher M, Rueß D, Schlaak M, Theurich S, von Bergwelt-Baildon M, Morgenthaler J, Jablonska K, Celik E, Ruge MI, Baues C. Robotic Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastases under Simultaneous Anti-PD-1 Treatment. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19092653. [PMID: 30205431 PMCID: PMC6164579 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19092653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Revised: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Combination concepts of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition are currently of high interest. We examined imaging findings, acute toxicity, and local control in patients with melanoma brain metastases receiving programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and/or robotic stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Twenty-six patients treated with SRS alone (n = 13; 20 lesions) or in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy (n = 13; 28 lesions) were analyzed. Lesion size was evaluated three and six months after SRS using a volumetric assessment based on cranial magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) and acute toxicity after 12 weeks according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Local control after six months was comparable (86%, SRS + anti-PD-1, and 80%, SRS). All toxicities reported were less than or equal to grade 2. One metastasis (5%) in the SRS group and six (21%) in the SRS + anti-PD-1 group increased after three months, whereas four (14%) of the six regressed during further follow-ups. This was rated as pseudoprogression (PsP). Three patients (23%) in the SRS + anti-PD-1 group showed characteristics of PsP. Treatment with SRS and anti-PD-1 antibodies can be combined safely in melanoma patients with cerebral metastases. Early volumetric progression of lesions under simultaneous treatment may be related to PsP; thus, the evaluation of combined radioimmunotherapy remains challenging and requires experienced teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike Trommer-Nestler
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Radio Immune-Oncology Consortium (RIO), University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Radio Immune-Oncology Consortium (RIO), University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Martin Kocher
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Institute for Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., 52425 Juelich, Germany.
| | - Daniel Rueß
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Max Schlaak
- Radio Immune-Oncology Consortium (RIO), University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Frauenlobstr. 9-11, 80377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Sebastian Theurich
- Radio Immune-Oncology Consortium (RIO), University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Department III of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon
- Radio Immune-Oncology Consortium (RIO), University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Department III of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany.
| | - Janis Morgenthaler
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Karolina Jablonska
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Eren Celik
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Maximilian I Ruge
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Centre of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Köln Bonn), University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
- Radio Immune-Oncology Consortium (RIO), University Hospital of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dolera M, Malfassi L, Marcarini S, Mazza G, Carrara N, Pavesi S, Sala M, Finesso S, Urso G. High dose hypofractionated frameless volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy is a feasible method for treating canine trigeminal nerve sheath tumors. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018; 59:624-631. [PMID: 29885013 DOI: 10.1111/vru.12637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this prospective pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of curative intent high dose hypofractionated frameless volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for treatment of canine trigeminal peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Client-owned dogs with a presumptive imaging-based diagnosis of trigeminal peripheral nerve sheath tumor were recruited for the study during the period of February 2010 to December 2013. Seven dogs were enrolled and treated with high dose hypofractionated volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy delivered by a 6 MV linear accelerator equipped with a micro-multileaf beam collimator. The plans were computed using a Monte Carlo algorithm with a prescription dose of 37 Gy delivered in five fractions on alternate days. Overall survival was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up examinations revealed complete response in one dog, partial response in four dogs, and stable disease in two dogs. Median overall survival was 952 days with a 95% confidence interval of 543-1361 days. Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy was demonstrated to be feasible and effective for trigeminal peripheral nerve sheath tumor treatment in this sample of dogs. The technique required few sedations and spared organs at risk. Even though larger studies are required, these preliminary results supported the use of high dose hypofractionated volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy as an alternative to other treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Dolera
- La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Lodi, Italy
| | - Luca Malfassi
- La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Lodi, Italy
| | - Silvia Marcarini
- La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Lodi, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazza
- La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Lodi, Italy
| | - Nancy Carrara
- La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Lodi, Italy
| | - Simone Pavesi
- La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Lodi, Italy
| | - Massimo Sala
- La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Lodi, Italy
| | - Sara Finesso
- La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Lodi, Italy
| | - Gaetano Urso
- Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lodi, Lodi, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kim J, Kim MM, Starkey LJ. A Primer on Secondary Brain Neoplasms: The Essentials. Semin Roentgenol 2018; 53:101-111. [PMID: 29405951 DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2017.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John Kim
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Leslie Jay Starkey
- Department of Radiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nordmann N, Hubbard M, Nordmann T, Sperduto PW, Clark HB, Hunt MA. Effect of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery and Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor Antagonists on Metastatic Melanoma. Cureus 2017; 9:e1943. [PMID: 29468099 PMCID: PMC5811164 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Learning objectives To evaluate radiation-induced changes in patients with brain metastasis secondary to malignant melanoma who received treatment with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor antagonists. Introduction Stereotactic radiosurgery and chemotherapeutics are used together for treatment of metastatic melanoma and have been linked to delayed radiation-induced vasculitic leukoencephalopathy (DRIVL). There have been reports of more intense interactions with new immunotherapeutics targeting PD-1 receptors, but their interactions have not been well described and may result in an accelerated response to GKRS. Here we present data on subjects treated with this combination from a single institution. Methods Records from patients who underwent treatment for metastatic melanoma to the brain with GKRS from 2011 to 2016 were reviewed. Demographics, date of brain metastasis diagnosis, cause of death when applicable, immunotherapeutics, and imaging findings were recorded. The timing of radiation therapy and medications were also documented. Results A total of 79 subjects were treated with GKRS, and 66 underwent treatment with both GKRS and immunotherapy. Regarding the 30 patients treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, 21 patients received pembrolizumab, seven patients received nivolumab, and two patients received pembrolizumab and nivolumab. Serial imaging was available for interpretation in 25 patients, with 13 subjects who received GKRS and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy less than six weeks of each other. While four subjects had indeterminate/mixed findings on subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nine subjects were noted to have progression. Two of these patients showed progression but subsequent imaging revealed a decrease in progression or improvement on MRI to previously targeted lesions by GKRS. None of the 13 subjects had surgery following their combined therapies. Conclusions This data suggests that there is need for further investigation of the role for concurrent treatment with PD-1 inhibitors and GKRS to enhance the treatment of metastatic melanoma. We present data on 13 patients who appear to have some radiologic benefit to this treatment combination, two of whom had radiographic pseudoprogression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Paul W Sperduto
- Minneapolis Radiation Oncology & Gamma Knife Center, University of Minnesota
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Khattab EM, Ahmed AF, Mohamed AEM, Ismail AM, Amer MM. Usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient value and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a noninvasive techniques in recurrent cerebral gliomas. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
27
|
Brown PD, Ballman KV, Cerhan JH, Anderson SK, Carrero XW, Whitton AC, Greenspoon J, Parney IF, Laack NNI, Ashman JB, Bahary JP, Hadjipanayis CG, Urbanic JJ, Barker FG, Farace E, Khuntia D, Giannini C, Buckner JC, Galanis E, Roberge D. Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery compared with whole brain radiotherapy for resected metastatic brain disease (NCCTG N107C/CEC·3): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:1049-1060. [PMID: 28687377 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30441-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 742] [Impact Index Per Article: 106.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2017] [Revised: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the standard of care to improve intracranial control following resection of brain metastasis. However, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity is widely used in an attempt to reduce cognitive toxicity, despite the absence of high-level comparative data substantiating efficacy in the postoperative setting. We aimed to establish the effect of SRS on survival and cognitive outcomes compared with WBRT in patients with resected brain metastasis. METHODS In this randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, adult patients (aged 18 years or older) from 48 institutions in the USA and Canada with one resected brain metastasis and a resection cavity less than 5·0 cm in maximal extent were randomly assigned (1:1) to either postoperative SRS (12-20 Gy single fraction with dose determined by surgical cavity volume) or WBRT (30 Gy in ten daily fractions or 37·5 Gy in 15 daily fractions of 2·5 Gy; fractionation schedule predetermined for all patients at treating centre). We randomised patients using a dynamic allocation strategy with stratification factors of age, duration of extracranial disease control, number of brain metastases, histology, maximal resection cavity diameter, and treatment centre. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The co-primary endpoints were cognitive-deterioration-free survival and overall survival, and analyses were done by intention to treat. We report the final analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01372774. FINDINGS Between Nov 10, 2011, and Nov 16, 2015, 194 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SRS (98 patients) or WBRT (96 patients). Median follow-up was 11·1 months (IQR 5·1-18·0). Cognitive-deterioration-free survival was longer in patients assigned to SRS (median 3·7 months [95% CI 3·45-5·06], 93 events) than in patients assigned to WBRT (median 3·0 months [2·86-3·25], 93 events; hazard ratio [HR] 0·47 [95% CI 0·35-0·63]; p<0·0001), and cognitive deterioration at 6 months was less frequent in patients who received SRS than those who received WBRT (28 [52%] of 54 evaluable patients assigned to SRS vs 41 [85%] of 48 evaluable patients assigned to WBRT; difference -33·6% [95% CI -45·3 to -21·8], p<0·00031). Median overall survival was 12·2 months (95% CI 9·7-16·0, 69 deaths) for SRS and 11·6 months (9·9-18·0, 67 deaths) for WBRT (HR 1·07 [95% CI 0·76-1·50]; p=0·70). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported with a relative frequency greater than 4% were hearing impairment (three [3%] of 93 patients in the SRS group vs eight [9%] of 92 patients in the WBRT group) and cognitive disturbance (three [3%] vs five [5%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION Decline in cognitive function was more frequent with WBRT than with SRS and there was no difference in overall survival between the treatment groups. After resection of a brain metastasis, SRS radiosurgery should be considered one of the standards of care as a less toxic alternative to WBRT for this patient population. FUNDING National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul D Brown
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Karla V Ballman
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - S Keith Anderson
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Xiomara W Carrero
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - James J Urbanic
- University of California San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Fred G Barker
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elana Farace
- Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Deepak Khuntia
- Precision Cancer Specialists and Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sparacia G, Agnello F, Banco A, Bencivinni F, Anastasi A, Giordano G, Taibbi A, Galia M, Bartolotta TV. Value of serial magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of brain metastases volume control during stereotactic radiosurgery. World J Radiol 2016; 8:916-921. [PMID: 28070243 PMCID: PMC5183925 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i12.916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2016] [Revised: 08/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate brain metastases volume control capabilities of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) through serial magnetic resonance (MR) imaging follow-up.
METHODS MR examinations of 54 brain metastases in 31 patients before and after SRS were reviewed. Patients were included in this study if they had a pre-treatment MR examination and serial follow-up MR examinations at 6 wk, 9 wk, 12 wk, and 12 mo after SRS. The metastasis volume change was categorized at each follow-up as increased (> 20% of the initial volume), stable (± 20% of the initial volume) or decreased (< 20% of the initial volume).
RESULTS A local tumor control with a significant (P < 0.05) volume decrease was observed in 25 metastases at 6-wk follow-up. Not significant volume change was observed in 23 metastases and a significant volume increase was observed in 6 metastases. At 9-wk follow-up, 15 out of 25 metastases that decreased in size at 6 wk had a transient tumor volume increase, followed by tumor regression at 12 wk. At 12-wk follow-up there was a significant reduction in volume in 45 metastases, and a significant volume increase in 4 metastases. At 12-mo follow-up, 19 metastases increased significantly in size (up to 41% of the initial volume). Volume tumor reduction was correlated to histopathologic subtype.
CONCLUSION SRS provided an effective local brain metastases volume control that was demonstrated at follow-up MR imaging.
Collapse
|
29
|
Desmond KL, Mehrabian H, Chavez S, Sahgal A, Soliman H, Rola R, Stanisz GJ. Chemical exchange saturation transfer for predicting response to stereotactic radiosurgery in human brain metastasis. Magn Reson Med 2016; 78:1110-1120. [PMID: 27690156 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2016] [Revised: 08/23/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this work was to determine the predictive value of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) metrics in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS CEST spectra at a radiofrequency power of 0.52 µT were collected on a 3 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging from 25 patients at three time points: pretreatment, 1 week, and 1 month post-treatment. Amide proton transfer-weighted images and maps of the amplitude and width of Lorentzian-shaped CEST peaks and the relaxation-compensated AREX metric were constructed at the offset frequencies of amide, amine, and relayed nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) from aliphatic groups as well as the broad magnetization transfer effect. Pretreatment CEST metrics, as well as CEST metric changes at 1 week post-treatment, were compared to changes in tumor volume at 1 month. RESULTS Significant (P < 0.05) 1-week predictive metrics included NOE peak amplitude (R = 0.69) in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and width (R = -0.55) in tumor. Baseline NOE in contralateral NAWM was negatively correlated (R = -0.69) with volume changes at 1 month. Metrics-defined outside tumor margins had higher correlation with volume changes than tumor regions of interest. CONCLUSION CEST metrics, in particular, the NOE peak amplitude, can predict volume changes 1 month post-SRS. Magn Reson Med 78:1110-1120, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly L Desmond
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hatef Mehrabian
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sofia Chavez
- Research Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Radoslaw Rola
- Department of Neurosurgery and Pediatric Neurosurgery, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
| | - Greg J Stanisz
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Neurosurgery and Pediatric Neurosurgery, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chang J, Cheung P, Erler D, Sonier M, Korol R, Chu W. Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma in Non-surgical Candidates: Initial Clinical Experience. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2016; 28:e109-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2015] [Revised: 03/03/2016] [Accepted: 03/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
31
|
Hansen KS, Zwingenberger AL, Théon AP, Pfeiffer I, Kent MS. Treatment of MRI-Diagnosed Trigeminal Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors by Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2016; 30:1112-20. [PMID: 27279132 PMCID: PMC5089643 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.13970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Revised: 02/19/2016] [Accepted: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is an emerging technique for treating tumors in animals. Objectives To assess the outcome of dogs with suspected intracranial trigeminal nerve peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNST) treated with SRT. Animals Eight dogs with presumptive PNST. Methods This was a retrospective study of dogs identified by searching UC Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital medical records for dogs treated with SRT for a presumed PNST. Presumptive diagnosis was based on magnetic resonance imaging. SRT was delivered in 3 dose fractions of 8 Gray (Gy) on consecutive days or every other day to a total dose of 24 Gy. Results Median disease‐specific survival was 745 days (range: 99–1375 days, n = 6). No signs of acute adverse effects of radiation treatment were recorded. Late radiation effects versus tumor progression could not be confirmed histopathologically because of few animals undergoing necropsy. Conclusions and Clinical Importance This study provides preliminary evidence that dogs with PNST benefit from SRT in terms of long‐term survival. The treatment appears to be well tolerated and requires fewer anesthetic events for animals compared to full‐course radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K S Hansen
- Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA
| | - A L Zwingenberger
- Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA
| | - A P Théon
- Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA
| | - I Pfeiffer
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
| | - M S Kent
- Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Alomari AK, Cohen J, Vortmeyer AO, Chiang A, Gettinger S, Goldberg S, Kluger HM, Chiang VL. Possible Interaction of Anti-PD-1 Therapy with the Effects of Radiosurgery on Brain Metastases. Cancer Immunol Res 2016; 4:481-7. [PMID: 26994250 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-15-0238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2015] [Accepted: 02/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Delayed radiation-induced vasculitic leukoencephalopathy related to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases has been reported to manifest clinically 9 to 18 months after treatment. Immune-modulating therapies have been introduced to treatment regimens for malignancies with metastatic predilection to the brain. The interaction of these systemic therapies with other modalities of treatment for brain metastases, namely, SRS, has not been fully characterized. We report two patients with metastatic malignancies to the brain who received SRS followed by immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to programmed death 1 (PD-1). Both patients appeared to have early clinical and radiologic progression of their treated lesions, which was highly suspicious for tumor progression. Both patients underwent surgical resection of their lesions and the material was submitted for histopathologic examination. Pathologic examination in both cases showed predominantly radiation-induced changes characterized by reactive astrocytosis and vascular wall infiltration by T lymphocytes. The accelerated response to SRS in these two patients was temporally related to the initiation of immunotherapy. We propose a possible biologic interaction between SRS and the PD-1 mAbs. Additionally, awareness of this potential occurrence is critical for accurate interpretation and proper management of clinical and radiologic findings in these patients. Cancer Immunol Res; 4(6); 481-7. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed K Alomari
- Department of Pathology, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| | - Justine Cohen
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Alexander O Vortmeyer
- Department of Pathology, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Anne Chiang
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Scott Gettinger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sarah Goldberg
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chuang MT, Liu YS, Tsai YS, Chen YC, Wang CK. Differentiating Radiation-Induced Necrosis from Recurrent Brain Tumor Using MR Perfusion and Spectroscopy: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0141438. [PMID: 26741961 PMCID: PMC4712150 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2015] [Accepted: 08/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This meta-analysis examined roles of several metabolites in differentiating recurrent tumor from necrosis in patients with brain tumors using MR perfusion and spectroscopy. Methods Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for studies using perfusion MRI and/or MR spectroscopy published up to March 4, 2015 which differentiated between recurrent tumor vs. necrosis in patients with primary brain tumors or brain metastasis. Only two-armed, prospective or retrospective studies were included. A meta-analysis was performed on the difference in relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), ratios of choline/creatine (Cho/Cr) and/or choline/N-acetyl aspartate (Cho/NAA) between participants undergoing MRI evaluation. A χ2-based test of homogeneity was performed using Cochran’s Q statistic and I2. Results Of 397 patients in 13 studies who were analyzed, the majority had tumor recurrence. As there was evidence of heterogeneity among 10 of the studies which used rCBV for evaluation (Q statistic = 31.634, I2 = 97.11%, P < 0.0001) a random-effects analysis was applied. The pooled difference in means (2.18, 95%CI = 0.85 to 3.50) indicated that the average rCBV in a contrast-enhancing lesion was significantly higher in tumor recurrence compared with radiation injury (P = 0.001). Based on a fixed-effect model of analysis encompassing the six studies which used Cho/Cr ratios for evaluation (Q statistic = 8.388, I2 = 40.39%, P = 0.137), the pooled difference in means (0.77, 95%CI = 0.57 to 0.98) of the average Cho/Cr ratio was significantly higher in tumor recurrence than in tumor necrosis (P = 0.001). There was significant difference in ratios of Cho to NAA between recurrent tumor and necrosis (1.02, 95%CI = 0.03 to 2.00, P = 0.044). Conclusions MR spectroscopy and MR perfusion using Cho/NAA and Cho/Cr ratios and rCBV may increase the accuracy of differentiating necrosis from recurrent tumor in patients with primary brain tumors or metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Tsung Chuang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Sheng Liu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Shan Tsai
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Chen Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Kuo Wang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Patil A, Sherbet G. Therapeutic approach to the management of HER2-positive breast cancer metastatic to the brain. Cancer Lett 2015; 358:93-99. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2014] [Revised: 12/11/2014] [Accepted: 12/11/2014] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
35
|
Pseudo-progression after stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases: lesion analysis using MRI cine-loops. J Neurooncol 2014; 119:437-43. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1519-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2013] [Accepted: 06/22/2014] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|