1
|
Provance OK, Oria VO, Tran TT, Caulfield JI, Zito CR, Aguirre-Ducler A, Schalper KA, Kluger HM, Jilaveanu LB. Vascular mimicry as a facilitator of melanoma brain metastasis. Cell Mol Life Sci 2024; 81:188. [PMID: 38635031 PMCID: PMC11026261 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-024-05217-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Melanoma has the highest propensity among solid tumors to metastasize to the brain. Melanoma brain metastases (MBM) are a leading cause of death in melanoma and affect 40-60% of patients with late-stage disease. Therefore, uncovering the molecular mechanisms behind MBM is necessary to enhance therapeutic interventions. Vascular mimicry (VM) is a form of neovascularization linked to invasion, increased risk of metastasis, and poor prognosis in many tumor types, but its significance in MBM remains poorly understood. We found that VM density is elevated in MBM compared to paired extracranial specimens and is associated with tumor volume and CNS edema. In addition, our studies indicate a relevant role of YAP and TAZ, two transcriptional co-factors scarcely studied in melanoma, in tumor cell-vasculogenesis and in brain metastasis. We recently demonstrated activation of the Hippo tumor suppressor pathway and increased degradation of its downstream targets YAP and TAZ in a metastasis impaired cell line model. In the current study we establish the utility of anti-YAP/TAZ therapy in mouse models of metastatic melanoma whereby treatment effectively inhibits VM and prolongs survival of mice with MBM. The data presented herein suggest that VM may be an important and targetable mechanism in melanoma and that VM inhibition might be useful for treating MBM, an area of high unmet clinical need, thus having important implications for future treatment regimens for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia K Provance
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Victor O Oria
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thuy T Tran
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Jasmine I Caulfield
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Christopher R Zito
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
- Department of Biology, School of Arts, Sciences, Business, and Education, University of Saint Joseph, West Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Adam Aguirre-Ducler
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kurt A Schalper
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Lucia B Jilaveanu
- Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huang RR, Chen Z, Kroeger N, Pantuck A, Said J, Kluger HM, Shuch B, Ye H. CD70 is Consistently Expressed in Primary and Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:347-353. [PMID: 38195301 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CD70 is commonly overexpressed in renal cell carcinoma and is minimally expressed in normal human tissue, making it a potential therapeutic target for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The expression frequency of CD70 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma is not well established. MATERIALS AND METHODS We assessed CD70 immunohistochemistry in 391 primary renal tumors and 72 metastatic renal cell carcinomas on a tissue microarray including 26 sets of paired primary and metastatic tumors. RESULTS CD70 was frequently overexpressed in clear cell carcinoma, with a significantly lower expression rate in papillary renal cell carcinoma (P < .0001). No expression of CD70 was detected in other types of renal tumors and normal renal parenchyma. In clear cell renal cell carcinoma, CD70 expression was significantly correlated with hypoxia pathway proteins, corroborating with a recent study suggesting that CD70 is a downstream target gene of hypoxia-inducible factor. While higher expression levels were observed in males and non-Caucasians, CD70 expression was not associated with tumor grade, sarcomatoid differentiation, stage, or cancer-specific survival. Further, analysis of 26 paired primary and metastatic tumors from same individuals revealed a concordance rate of 85%. CONCLUSION Our findings validated CD70 as a promising therapeutic target for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The utility of primary tumor tissue as surrogate samples for metastatic clear cell carcinoma awaits future CD70-targeted clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Rong Huang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Zhengshan Chen
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; Pathology, Kaiser Permanente Riverside Medical Center, Riverside, CA
| | - Nils Kroeger
- Department of Urology, University of Greifswald, M-V, Germany
| | - Allan Pantuck
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jonathan Said
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Brian Shuch
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Huihui Ye
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Su DG, Schoenfeld DA, Ibrahim W, Cabrejo R, Djureinovic D, Baumann R, Rimm DL, Khan SA, Halaban R, Kluger HM, Olino K, Galan A, Clune J. Digital spatial proteomic profiling reveals immune checkpoints as biomarkers in lymphoid aggregates and tumor microenvironment of desmoplastic melanoma. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e008646. [PMID: 38519058 PMCID: PMC10961546 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Desmoplastic melanoma (DM) is a rare melanoma subtype characterized by dense fibrous stroma, a propensity for local recurrence, and a high response rate to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade. Occult sentinel lymph node positivity is significantly lower in both pure and mixed DM than in conventional melanoma, underscoring the need for better prognostic biomarkers to inform therapeutic strategies. METHODS We assembled a tissue microarray comprising various cores of tumor, stroma, and lymphoid aggregates from 45 patients with histologically confirmed DM diagnosed between 1989 and 2018. Using a panel of 62 validated immune-oncology markers, we performed digital spatial profiling using the NanoString GeoMx platform and quantified expression in three tissue compartments defined by fluorescence colocalization (tumor (S100+/PMEL+/SYTO+), leukocytes (CD45+/SYTO+), and non-immune stroma (S100-/PMEL-/CD45-/SYTO+)). RESULTS We observed higher expression of immune checkpoints (lymphocyte-activation gene 3 [LAG-3] and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein-4 [CTLA-4]) and cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) markers (smooth muscle actin (SMA)) in the tumor compartments of pure DMs than mixed DMs. When comparing lymphoid aggregates (LA) to non-LA tumor cores, LAs were more enriched with CD20+B cells, but non-LA intratumoral leukocytes were more enriched with macrophage/monocytic markers (CD163, CD68, CD14) and had higher LAG-3 and CTLA-4 expression levels. Higher intratumoral PD-1 and LA-based LAG-3 expression appear to be associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS Our proteomic analysis reveals an intra-tumoral population of SMA+CAFs enriched in pure DM. Additionally, increased expressions of immune checkpoints (LAG-3 and PD-1) in LA and within tumor were associated with poorer prognosis. These findings might have therapeutic implications and help guide treatment selection in addition to informing potential prognostic significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David G Su
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - David A Schoenfeld
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Wael Ibrahim
- Department of Pathology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Raysa Cabrejo
- Department of Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Dijana Djureinovic
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Raymond Baumann
- Department of Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sajid A Khan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Ruth Halaban
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kelly Olino
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Anjela Galan
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - James Clune
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kerekes DM, Frey AE, Prsic EH, Tran TT, Clune JE, Sznol M, Kluger HM, Forman HP, Becher RD, Olino KL, Khan SA. Immunotherapy Initiation at the End of Life in Patients With Metastatic Cancer in the US. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:342-351. [PMID: 38175659 PMCID: PMC10767643 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Importance While immunotherapy is being used in an expanding range of clinical scenarios, the incidence of immunotherapy initiation at the end of life (EOL) is unknown. Objective To describe patient characteristics, practice patterns, and risk factors concerning EOL-initiated (EOL-I) immunotherapy over time. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective cohort study using a US national clinical database of patients with metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or kidney cell carcinoma (KCC) diagnosed after US Food and Drug Administration approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of each disease through December 2019. Mean follow-up was 13.7 months. Data analysis was performed from December 2022 to May 2023. Exposures Age, sex, race and ethnicity, insurance, location, facility type, hospital volume, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index, and location of metastases. Main Outcomes and Measures Main outcomes were EOL-I immunotherapy, defined as immunotherapy initiated within 1 month of death, and characteristics of the cohort receiving EOL-I immunotherapy and factors associated with its use. Results Overall, data for 242 371 patients were analyzed. The study included 20 415 patients with stage IV melanoma, 197 331 patients with stage IV NSCLC, and 24 625 patients with stage IV KCC. Mean (SD) age was 67.9 (11.4) years, 42.5% were older than 70 years, 56.0% were male, and 29.3% received immunotherapy. The percentage of patients who received EOL-I immunotherapy increased over time for all cancers. More than 1 in 14 immunotherapy treatments in 2019 were initiated within 1 month of death. Risk-adjusted patients with 3 or more organs involved in metastatic disease were 3.8-fold more likely (95% CI, 3.1-4.7; P < .001) to die within 1 month of immunotherapy initiation than those with lymph node involvement only. Treatment at an academic or high-volume center rather than a nonacademic or very low-volume center was associated with a 31% (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.65-0.74; P < .001) and 30% (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.65-0.76; P < .001) decrease in odds of death within a month of initiating immunotherapy, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this cohort study show that the initiation of immunotherapy at the EOL is increasing over time. Patients with higher metastatic burden and who were treated at nonacademic or low-volume facilities had higher odds of receiving EOL-I immunotherapy. Tracking EOL-I immunotherapy can offer insights into national prescribing patterns and serve as a harbinger for shifts in the clinical approach to patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M. Kerekes
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Alexander E. Frey
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Elizabeth H. Prsic
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Thuy T. Tran
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - James E. Clune
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Mario Sznol
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harriet M. Kluger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Howard P. Forman
- Department of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Robert D. Becher
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kelly L. Olino
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sajid A. Khan
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Frey AE, Kerekes DM, Khan SA, Tran TT, Kluger HM, Clune JE, Ariyan S, Sznol M, Ishizuka JJ, Olino KL. Immunotherapy utilization in stage IIIA melanoma: less may be more. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1336441. [PMID: 38380358 PMCID: PMC10876869 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1336441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Immunotherapy agents are approved for adjuvant treatment of stage III melanoma; however, evidence for survival benefit in early stage III disease is lacking. Current guidelines for adjuvant immunotherapy utilization in stage IIIA rely on clinician judgment, creating an opportunity for significant variation in prescribing patterns. This study aimed to characterize current immunotherapy practice variations and to compare patient outcomes for different prescribing practices in stage IIIA melanoma. Study design Patients with melanoma diagnosed from 2015-2019 that met American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition criteria for stage IIIA and underwent resection were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multiple imputation by chained equations replaced missing values. Factors associated with receipt of adjuvant immunotherapy were identified. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression compared overall survival across groups. Results Of 4,432 patients included in the study, 34% received adjuvant immunotherapy. Patients had lower risk-adjusted odds of receiving immunotherapy if they were treated at an academic center (OR=0.48, 95%CI=0.33-0.72, p<0.001 vs. community facility) or at a high-volume center (OR=0.69, 0.56-0.84, p<0.001 vs. low-volume). Immunotherapy receipt was not associated with risk-adjusted survival (p=0.095). Moreover, patients treated at high-volume centers experienced longer overall risk-adjusted survival than those treated at low-volume centers (HR=0.52, 0.29-0.93, p=0.030). Risk-adjusted survival trended toward being longer at academic centers than at community centers, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion Academic and high-volume centers utilize significantly less adjuvant immunotherapy in stage IIIA melanoma than community and low-volume centers without compromise in overall survival. These findings suggest that this population may benefit from more judicious immunotherapy utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander E Frey
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Daniel M Kerekes
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Sajid A Khan
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Thuy T Tran
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - James E Clune
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Stephan Ariyan
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Mario Sznol
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Jeffrey J Ishizuka
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Kelly L Olino
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weiss SA, Sznol M, Shaheen M, Berciano-Guerrero MÁ, Couselo EM, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Boni V, Schuchter LM, Gonzalez-Cao M, Arance A, Wei W, Ganti AK, Hauke RJ, Berrocal A, Iannotti NO, Hsu FJ, Kluger HM. A Phase II Trial of the CD40 Agonistic Antibody Sotigalimab (APX005M) in Combination with Nivolumab in Subjects with Metastatic Melanoma with Confirmed Disease Progression on Anti-PD-1 Therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:74-81. [PMID: 37535056 PMCID: PMC10767304 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Disease progression during or after anti-PD-1-based treatment is common in advanced melanoma. Sotigalimab is a CD40 agonist antibody with a unique epitope specificity and Fc receptor binding profile optimized for activation of CD40-expressing antigen-presenting cells. Preclinical data indicated that CD40 agonists combined with anti-PD1 could overcome resistance to anti-PD-1. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase II trial to evaluate the combination of sotigalimab 0.3 mg/kg and nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks in patients with advanced melanoma following confirmed disease progression on a PD-1 inhibitor. The primary objective was to determine the objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS Thirty-eight subjects were enrolled and evaluable for safety. Thirty-three were evaluable for activity. Five confirmed partial responses (PR) were observed for an ORR of 15%. Two PRs are ongoing at 45.9+ and 26+ months, whereas the other three responders relapsed at 41.1, 18.7, and 18.4 months. The median duration of response was at least 26 months. Two additional patients had stable disease for >6 months. Thirty-four patients (89%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), and 13% experienced a grade 3 AE related to sotigalimab. The most common AEs were pyrexia, chills, nausea, fatigue, pruritus, elevated liver function, rash, vomiting, headache, arthralgia, asthenia, myalgia, and diarrhea. There were no treatment-related SAEs, deaths, or discontinuation of sotigalimab due to AEs. CONCLUSIONS Sotigalimab plus nivolumab had a favorable safety profile consistent with the toxicity profiles of each agent. The combination resulted in durable and prolonged responses in a subset of patients with anti-PD-1-resistant melanoma, warranting further evaluation in this setting. See related commentary by Wu and Luke, p. 9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A. Weiss
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Mario Sznol
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Miguel-Ángel Berciano-Guerrero
- Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Regional and Virgen de la Victoria University Hospitals, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina-IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND, Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Valentina Boni
- START Madrid-CIOCC, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lynn M. Schuchter
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Maria Gonzalez-Cao
- Instituto Oncológico, Quirón Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Arance
- Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Wei Wei
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Apar Kishor Ganti
- VA Nebraska Western Iowa Healthcare System and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smalley I, Boire A, Brastianos P, Kluger HM, Hernando-Monge E, Forsyth PA, Ahmed KA, Smalley KSM, Ferguson S, Davies MA, Glitza Oliva IC. Leptomeningeal disease in melanoma: An update on the developments in pathophysiology and clinical care. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2024; 37:51-67. [PMID: 37622466 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.13116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) remains a major challenge in the clinical management of metastatic melanoma patients. Outcomes for patient remain poor, and patients with LMD continue to be excluded from almost all clinical trials. However, recent trials have demonstrated the feasibility of conducting prospective clinical trials in these patients. Further, new insights into the pathophysiology of LMD are identifying rational new therapeutic strategies. Here we present recent advances in the understanding of, and treatment options for, LMD from metastatic melanoma. We also annotate key areas of future focus to accelerate progress for this challenging but emerging field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inna Smalley
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Priscilla Brastianos
- Department of Medicine, MGH Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Eva Hernando-Monge
- Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology and Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Immunology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Keiran S M Smalley
- Department of Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sherise Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Djureinovic D, Weiss SA, Krykbaeva I, Qu R, Vathiotis I, Moutafi M, Zhang L, Perdigoto AL, Wei W, Anderson G, Damsky W, Hurwitz M, Johnson B, Schoenfeld D, Mahajan A, Hsu F, Miller-Jensen K, Kluger Y, Sznol M, Kaech SM, Bosenberg M, Jilaveanu LB, Kluger HM. A bedside to bench study of anti-PD-1, anti-CD40, and anti-CSF1R indicates that more is not necessarily better. Mol Cancer 2023; 22:182. [PMID: 37964379 PMCID: PMC10644655 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01884-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stimulating inflammatory tumor associated macrophages can overcome resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade. We previously conducted a phase I trial of cabiralizumab (anti-CSF1R), sotigalimab (CD40-agonist) and nivolumab. Our current purpose was to study the activity and cellular effects of this three-drug regimen in anti-PD-1-resistant melanoma. METHODS We employed a Simon's two-stage design and analyzed circulating immune cells from patients treated with this regimen for treatment-related changes. We assessed various dose levels of anti-CSF1R in murine melanoma models and studied the cellular and molecular effects. RESULTS Thirteen patients were enrolled in the first stage. We observed one (7.7%) confirmed and one (7.7%) unconfirmed partial response, 5 patients had stable disease (38.5%) and 6 disease progression (42.6%). We elected not to proceed to the second stage. CyTOF analysis revealed a reduction in non-classical monocytes. Patients with prolonged stable disease or partial response who remained on study for longer had increased markers of antigen presentation after treatment compared to patients whose disease progressed rapidly. In a murine model, higher anti-CSF1R doses resulted in increased tumor growth and worse survival. Using single-cell RNA-sequencing, we identified a suppressive monocyte/macrophage population in murine tumors exposed to higher doses. CONCLUSIONS Higher anti-CSF1R doses are inferior to lower doses in a preclinical model, inducing a suppressive macrophage population, and potentially explaining the disappointing results observed in patients. While it is impossible to directly infer human doses from murine studies, careful intra-species evaluation can provide important insight. Cabiralizumab dose optimization is necessary for this patient population with limited treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03502330.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dijana Djureinovic
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW211B, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Sarah A Weiss
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW211B, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Irina Krykbaeva
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Rihao Qu
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ioannis Vathiotis
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Myrto Moutafi
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lin Zhang
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW211B, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Ana L Perdigoto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Gail Anderson
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW211B, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - William Damsky
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael Hurwitz
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW211B, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Barbara Johnson
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW211B, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - David Schoenfeld
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW211B, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Amit Mahajan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Kathryn Miller-Jensen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Systems Biology Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yuval Kluger
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mario Sznol
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW211B, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Susan M Kaech
- NOMIS Center for Immunobiology and Microbial Pathogenesis, Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Marcus Bosenberg
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lucia B Jilaveanu
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW211B, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, WWW211B, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Krykbaeva I, Bridges K, Damsky W, Pizzurro GA, Alexander AF, McGeary MK, Park K, Muthusamy V, Eyles J, Luheshi N, Turner N, Weiss SA, Olino K, Kaech SM, Kluger HM, Miller-Jensen K, Bosenberg M. Combinatorial Immunotherapy with Agonistic CD40 Activates Dendritic Cells to Express IL12 and Overcomes PD-1 Resistance. Cancer Immunol Res 2023; 11:1332-1350. [PMID: 37478171 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-22-0699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment, but resistance remains a significant clinical challenge. Myeloid cells within the tumor microenvironment can modulate checkpoint resistance by either supporting or suppressing adaptive immune responses. Using an anti-PD-1-resistant mouse melanoma model, we show that targeting the myeloid compartment via CD40 activation and CSF1R blockade in combination with anti-PD-1 results in complete tumor regression in a majority of mice. This triple therapy combination was primarily CD40 agonist-driven in the first 24 hours after therapy and showed a similar systemic cytokine profile in human patients as was seen in mice. Functional single-cell cytokine secretion profiling of dendritic cells (DC) using a novel microwell assay identified a CCL22+CCL5+ IL12-secreting DC subset as important early-stage effectors of triple therapy. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are both critical effectors of treatment, and systems analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data supported a role for DC-secreted IL12 in priming T-cell activation and recruitment. Finally, we showed that treatment with a novel IL12 mRNA therapeutic alone was sufficient to overcome PD-1 resistance and cause tumor regression. Overall, we conclude that combining myeloid-based innate immune activation and enhancement of adaptive immunity is a viable strategy to overcome anti-PD-1 resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Krykbaeva
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kate Bridges
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - William Damsky
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Gabriela A Pizzurro
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Amanda F Alexander
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Meaghan K McGeary
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Koonam Park
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Viswanathan Muthusamy
- Yale Center for Precision Cancer Modeling, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - James Eyles
- Oncology Research and Early Development, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Nadia Luheshi
- Oncology Research and Early Development, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Noel Turner
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Sarah A Weiss
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kelly Olino
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susan M Kaech
- NOMIS Center for Immunobiology and Microbial Pathogenesis, Salk Institute of Biological Sciences, La Jolla, California
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kathryn Miller-Jensen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Marcus Bosenberg
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Yale Center for Precision Cancer Modeling, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Martinez-Morilla S, Moutafi M, Fernandez AI, Jessel S, Divakar P, Wong PF, Garcia-Milian R, Schalper KA, Kluger HM, Rimm DL. Digital spatial profiling of melanoma shows CD95 expression in immune cells is associated with resistance to immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 2023; 12:2260618. [PMID: 37781235 PMCID: PMC10540659 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2023.2260618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Although immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has dramatically improved outcome for metastatic melanoma patients, many patients do not benefit. Since adverse events may be severe, biomarkers for resistance would be valuable, especially in the adjuvant setting. We performed high-plex digital spatial profiling (DSP) using the NanoString GeoMx® on 53 pre-treatment specimens from ICI-treated metastatic melanoma cases. We interrogated 77 targets simultaneously in four molecular compartments defined by S100B for tumor, CD68 for macrophages, CD45 for leukocytes, and nonimmune stromal cells defined as regions negative for all three compartment markers but positive for SYTO 13. For DSP validation, we confirmed the results obtained for some immune markers, such as CD8, CD4, CD20, CD68, CD45, and PD-L1, by quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF). In the univariable analysis, 38 variables were associated with outcome, 14 of which remained significant after multivariable adjustment. Among them, CD95 was further validated using multiplex immunofluorescence in the Discovery immunotherapy (ITX) Cohort and an independent validation cohort with similar characteristics, showing an association between high levels of CD95 and shorter progression-free survival. We found that CD95 in stroma was associated with resistance to ICI. With further validation, this biomarker could have value to select patients that will not benefit from immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Myrto Moutafi
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Shlomit Jessel
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Pok Fai Wong
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Rolando Garcia-Milian
- Bioinformatics Support Program, Cushing/Whitney Medical Library, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kurt A. Schalper
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Harriet M. Kluger
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David L. Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mann JE, Lucca L, Austin MR, Merkin RD, Robert ME, Al Bawardy B, Raddassi K, Aizenbud L, Joshi NS, Hafler DA, Abraham C, Herold KC, Kluger HM. ScRNA-seq defines dynamic T-cell subsets in longitudinal colon and peripheral blood samples in immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e007358. [PMID: 37586769 PMCID: PMC10432652 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly being used to manage multiple tumor types. Unfortunately, immune-related adverse events affect up to 60% of recipients, often leading to treatment discontinuation in settings where few alternative cancer therapies may be available. Checkpoint inhibitor induced colitis (ICI-colitis) is a common toxicity for which the underlying mechanisms are poorly defined. To better understand the changing colon-specific and peripheral immune environments over the course of progression and treatment of colitis, we collected blood and colon tissue from a patient with Merkel cell carcinoma who developed colitis on treatment with pembrolizumab. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing and T-cell receptor sequencing on samples collected before, during and after pembrolizumab and after various interventions to mitigate toxicity. We report T-cells populations defined by cytotoxicity, memory, and proliferation markers at various stages of colitis. We show preferential depletion of CD8+ T cells with biologic therapy and nominate both circulating and colon-resident T-cell subsets as potential drivers of inflammation and response to immune suppression. Our findings highlight the need for further exploration of the colon immune environment and rationalize future studies evaluating biologics for ICI-colitis, including in the context of ICI re-challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline E Mann
- Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Liliana Lucca
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Matthew R Austin
- Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Ross D Merkin
- Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marie E Robert
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Badr Al Bawardy
- Department of Internal Medicine (Digestive Diseases), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Khadir Raddassi
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lilach Aizenbud
- Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Nikhil S Joshi
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - David A Hafler
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Clara Abraham
- Department of Internal Medicine (Digestive Diseases), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kevan C Herold
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine (Endocrinology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Internal Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schoenfeld DA, Moutafi M, Martinez S, Djureinovic D, Merkin RD, Adeniran A, Braun DA, Signoretti S, Choueiri TK, Parisi F, Hurwitz M, Rimm DL, Wei W, Jilaveanu L, Kluger HM. Immune dysfunction revealed by digital spatial profiling of immuno-oncology markers in progressive stages of renal cell carcinoma and in brain metastases. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e007240. [PMID: 37586773 PMCID: PMC10432651 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The tumor microenvironment (TME) contributes to cancer progression and treatment response to therapy, including in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Prior profiling studies, including single-cell transcriptomics, often involve limited sample sizes and lack spatial orientation. The TME of RCC brain metastases, a major cause of morbidity, also remains largely uncharacterized. METHODS We performed digital spatial profiling on the NanoString GeoMx platform using 52 validated immuno-oncology markers on RCC tissue microarrays representing progressive stages of RCC, including brain metastases. We profiled 76 primary tumors, 27 adjacent histologically normal kidney samples, and 86 metastases, including 24 brain metastases. RESULTS We observed lower immune checkpoint (TIM-3 and CTLA-4), cytolytic (GZMA and GZMB), and T cell activation (CD25) protein expression in metastases compared with primary tumors in two separate cohorts. We also identified changes in macrophages in metastases, with brain metastases-susceptible patients showing less M1-like, inflammatory macrophage markers (HLA-DR and CD127) in metastatic samples. A comparison of brain metastases to extracranial metastases revealed higher expression of the anti-apoptotic, BCL-2-family protein BCL-XL and lower expression of the innate immune activator STING in brain metastases. Lower TIM-3 and CD40 in the TME of brain metastases appear to be associated with longer survival, a finding that requires further validation. CONCLUSIONS Compared with primary tumors, RCC metastases, including brain metastases, express lower levels of numerous markers of immune activation and current or investigational therapeutic targets. Our findings may have important implications for designing future biomarker and treatment studies and may aid in development of brain metastases-specific therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Schoenfeld
- School of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Myrto Moutafi
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sandra Martinez
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Dijana Djureinovic
- School of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Ross D Merkin
- School of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Adebowale Adeniran
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - David A Braun
- School of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sabina Signoretti
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fabio Parisi
- School of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael Hurwitz
- School of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lucia Jilaveanu
- School of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- School of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kluger HM, Tawbi H, Feltquate D, LaVallee T, Rizvi NA, Sharon E, Sosman J, Sullivan RJ. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) checkpoint inhibitor resistance definitions: efforts to harmonize terminology and accelerate immuno-oncology drug development. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e007309. [PMID: 37487665 PMCID: PMC10373737 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The need for solid clinical definitions of resistance to programmed death 1 or its ligand (PD-(L)1) inhibitors for clinical trial design was identified as a priority by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC). Broad consensus efforts have provided definitions for primary and secondary resistance and resistance after stopping therapy for both single-agent PD-(L)1 inhibitors and associated combinations. Validation of SITC's definitions is critical and requires field-wide data sharing and collaboration. Here, in this commentary, we detail current utility and incorporation of SITC's definitions and discuss the next steps both the society and the field must take to further advance immuno-oncology drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | - Elad Sharon
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jeffrey Sosman
- Jeff Sosman, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aizenbud L, Schoenfeld DA, Caulfield JI, Mann JE, Austin MR, Perdigoto AL, Herold KC, Kluger HM. Response to " NLRC5 germline variants and their potential role in eliciting an immune response in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors" by Xiang-Yu Meng. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e007397. [PMID: 37349129 PMCID: PMC10314693 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lilach Aizenbud
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - David A Schoenfeld
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jasmine I Caulfield
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jacqueline E Mann
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Matthew R Austin
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Ana Luisa Perdigoto
- Department of Medicine (Endocrinology and Metabolism), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kevan C Herold
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tran TT, Caulfield J, Zhang L, Schoenfeld D, Djureinovic D, Chiang VL, Oria V, Weiss SA, Olino K, Jilaveanu LB, Kluger HM. Lenvatinib or anti-VEGF in combination with anti-PD-1 differentially augments antitumor activity in melanoma. JCI Insight 2023; 8:e157347. [PMID: 36821392 PMCID: PMC10132152 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.157347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Targeting tumor-associated blood vessels to increase immune infiltration may enhance treatment effectiveness, yet limited data exist regarding anti-angiogenesis effects on the tumor microenvironment (TME). We hypothesized that dual targeting of angiogenesis with immune checkpoints would improve both intracranial and extracranial disease. We used subcutaneous and left ventricle melanoma models to evaluate anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF and anti-PD-1/lenvatinib (pan-VEGFR inhibitor) combinations. Cytokine/chemokine profiling and flow cytometry were performed to assess signaling and immune-infiltrating populations. An in vitro blood-brain barrier (BBB) model was utilized to study intracranial treatment effects on endothelial integrity and leukocyte transmigration. Anti-PD-1 with either anti-VEGF or lenvatinib improved survival and decreased tumor growth in systemic melanoma murine models; treatment increased Th1 cytokine/chemokine signaling. Lenvatinib decreased tumor-associated macrophages but increased plasmacytoid DCs early in treatment; this effect was not evident with anti-VEGF. Both lenvatinib and anti-VEGF resulted in decreased intratumoral blood vessels. Although anti-VEGF promoted endothelial stabilization in an in vitro BBB model, while lenvatinib did not, both regimens enabled leukocyte transmigration. The combined targeting of PD-1 and VEGF or its receptors promotes enhanced melanoma antitumor activity, yet their effects on the TME are quite different. These studies provide insights into dual anti-PD-1 and anti-angiogenesis combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuy T. Tran
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jasmine Caulfield
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lin Zhang
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - David Schoenfeld
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Dijana Djureinovic
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Veronica L. Chiang
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Victor Oria
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sarah A. Weiss
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kelly Olino
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Lucia B. Jilaveanu
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harriet M. Kluger
- Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mann JE, Lucca L, Austin M, Merkin RD, Aizenbud L, Herold K, Robert M, Kluger HM. Abstract 2268: Single cell RNA sequencing defines dynamic immune cell subsets in serial colon and peripheral blood samples in a patient with checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-2268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition is an increasingly popular strategy for the management of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, severe inflammatory toxicities affect up to 60% of patients, often leading to treatment discontinuation in settings where few alternative therapies are available to control disease. Checkpoint inhibitor induced colitis is a common toxicity for which the underlying mechanisms are poorly defined.
Methods: To better understand the changing colon-specific and peripheral immune environments over the course of disease progression and treatment, we collected blood and colon tissue from a Merkel Cell carcinoma patient who developed colitis after treatment with pembrolizumab. We performed 10X Genomics single cell RNA sequencing on samples collected before, during and after checkpoint inhibition and various interventions to mitigate toxicity.
Results: We identified both shared and colon-exclusive clonal expansion of T cells defined by distinct transcriptional programs, including cytotoxicity, memory, and proliferation markers, at various stages of the disease process. These clones decreased dramatically in the colon after infliximab and vedolizumab therapies.
Conclusions: We identified several distinct T cell subsets as potential drivers of colitis in the colon. T cell clones that potentially recognize colonic tissue with a high degree of specificity can be harnessed for therapeutic intervention. Our findings emphasize the need for a more detailed understanding of the immune environment in the colon and suggest the potential for peripheral blood as a readout for immune activity during CPI treatment.
Citation Format: Jacqueline E. Mann, Liliana Lucca, Matthew Austin, Ross D. Merkin, Lilach Aizenbud, Kevan Herold, Marie Robert, Harriet M. Kluger. Single cell RNA sequencing defines dynamic immune cell subsets in serial colon and peripheral blood samples in a patient with checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2268.
Collapse
|
17
|
Djureinovic D, Weiss SA, Krykbaeva I, Qu R, Vathiotis I, Moutafi M, Zhang L, Perdigoto AL, Wei W, Anderson G, Damsky W, Hurwitz M, Johnson B, Mahajan A, Hsu F, Miller-Jensen K, Kluger Y, Sznol M, Kaech SM, Bosenberg M, Jilaveanu L, Kluger HM. Abstract 3287: A bedside to bench study of anti-PD-1, anti-CD40, and anti-CSF1R indicates that more is not necessarily better. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-3287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Stimulating innate immunity can potentially enable us to overcome resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade. We previously conducted a phase 1 trial of cabiralizumab (anti-CSF1R) with sotigalimab (CD40 agonistic antibody) and nivolumab. Our purpose was to determine safety and the effects of this regimen on circulating and tumor-infiltrating immune cells and to determine the activity of this regimen in a phase 1b trial for melanoma patients whose disease had progressed on anti-PD-(L)1. CyTOF analysis on circulating immune cells taken before and during treatment revealed a reduction in non-classical monocytes and an increase in dendritic cells. Patients with prolonged stable disease had less T-regulatory cells and more circulating antigen presenting cells after treatment compared to patients that were treated for a shorter time. In the phase 1b component of the trial in 13 melanoma patients, objective response rates were: 1 confirmed partial response (7.7%), 1 unconfirmed partial response (7.7%), 5 stable disease (38.5%) and 6 disease progression (42.6%). Despite therapy-induced changes in circulating immune cells and previous preclinical studies supporting rationale for this combination, responses in humans were insufficient to proceed to the second stage of the phase 1b trial. Given the challenges with translating doses from mice to humans, we proceeded to study various doses of anti-CSF1R in combination with CD40 agonist and anti-PD-1 in a murine model. Higher dose anti-CSF1R in mice was associated with increased tumor growth, worse survival and by single-cell RNA-sequencing analyses, we identified a more suppressive monocyte/macrophage profile in murine tumors. Our study suggests that more anti-CSF1R might not be better. Further optimization of cabiralizumab dosing is necessary to evaluate the clinical potential in combination with anti-PD-1 and anti-CD40 in a difficult-to treat patient population whose therapeutic options are limited.
Citation Format: Dijana Djureinovic, Sarah A. Weiss, Irina Krykbaeva, Rihao Qu, Ioannis Vathiotis, Myrto Moutafi, Lin Zhang, Ana L. Perdigoto, Wei Wei, Gail Anderson, William Damsky, Michael Hurwitz, Barbara Johnson, Amit Mahajan, Frank Hsu, Kathryn Miller-Jensen, Yuval Kluger, Mario Sznol, Susan M. Kaech, Marcus Bosenberg, Lucia Jilaveanu, Harriet M. Kluger. A bedside to bench study of anti-PD-1, anti-CD40, and anti-CSF1R indicates that more is not necessarily better [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3287.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Wei Wei
- 1Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Topalian SL, Sznol M, McDermott DF, Kluger HM, Carvajal RD, Sharfman WH, Brahmer JR, Lawrence DP, Atkins MB, Powderly JD, Leming PD, Lipson EJ, Puzanov I, Smith DC, Taube JM, Wigginton JM, Kollia GD, Gupta A, Pardoll DM, Sosman JA, Hodi FS. Survival, Durable Tumor Remission, and Long-Term Safety in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Receiving Nivolumab. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:943-954. [PMID: 36750016 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) is an inhibitory receptor expressed by activated T cells that downmodulates effector functions and limits the generation of immune memory. PD-1 blockade can mediate tumor regression in a substantial proportion of patients with melanoma, but it is not known whether this is associated with extended survival or maintenance of response after treatment is discontinued. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced melanoma (N = 107) enrolled between 2008 and 2012 received intravenous nivolumab in an outpatient setting every 2 weeks for up to 96 weeks and were observed for overall survival, long-term safety, and response duration after treatment discontinuation. RESULTS Median overall survival in nivolumab-treated patients (62% with two to five prior systemic therapies) was 16.8 months, and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 62% and 43%, respectively. Among 33 patients with objective tumor regressions (31%), the Kaplan-Meier estimated median response duration was 2 years. Seventeen patients discontinued therapy for reasons other than disease progression, and 12 (71%) of 17 maintained responses off-therapy for at least 16 weeks (range, 16 to 56+ weeks). Objective response and toxicity rates were similar to those reported previously; in an extended analysis of all 306 patients treated on this trial (including those with other cancer types), exposure-adjusted toxicity rates were not cumulative. CONCLUSION Overall survival following nivolumab treatment in patients with advanced treatment-refractory melanoma compares favorably with that in literature studies of similar patient populations. Responses were durable and persisted after drug discontinuation. Long-term safety was acceptable. Ongoing randomized clinical trials will further assess the impact of nivolumab therapy on overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne L Topalian
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Mario Sznol
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - David F McDermott
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Richard D Carvajal
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - William H Sharfman
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Julie R Brahmer
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Donald P Lawrence
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - John D Powderly
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Philip D Leming
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Evan J Lipson
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - David C Smith
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Janis M Taube
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Jon M Wigginton
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Georgia D Kollia
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Ashok Gupta
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Drew M Pardoll
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - Jeffrey A Sosman
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Suzanne L. Topalian, William H. Sharfman, Julie R. Brahmer, Evan J. Lipson, Janis M. Taube, and Drew M. Pardoll, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Mario Sznol and Harriet M. Kluger, Yale University School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT; David F. McDermott, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Donald P. Lawrence, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center; F. Stephen Hodi, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Richard D. Carvajal, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Michael B. Atkins, Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; John D. Powderly, Carolina BioOncology Institute, Huntersville, NC; Philip D. Leming, The Christ Hospital Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH; Igor Puzanov and Jeffrey A. Sosman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; David C. Smith, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and Jon M. Wigginton, Georgia D. Kollia, and Ashok Gupta, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vathiotis IA, Salichos L, Martinez-Morilla S, Gavrielatou N, Aung TN, Shafi S, Wong PF, Jessel S, Kluger HM, Syrigos KN, Warren S, Gerstein M, Rimm DL. Baseline gene expression profiling determines long-term benefit to programmed cell death protein 1 axis blockade. NPJ Precis Oncol 2022; 6:92. [PMID: 36522538 PMCID: PMC9755314 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-022-00330-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors has altered the course of malignant melanoma, with approximately half of the patients with advanced disease surviving for more than 5 years after diagnosis. Currently, there are no biomarker methods for predicting outcome from immunotherapy. Here, we obtained transcriptomic information from a total of 105 baseline tumor samples comprising two cohorts of patients with advanced melanoma treated with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-based immunotherapies. Gene expression profiles were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) within consecutive clinical benefit intervals (i.e., 6, 12, 18, and 24 months). Elastic net binomial regression models with cross validation were utilized to compare the predictive value of distinct genes across time. Lasso regression was used to generate a signature predicting long-term benefit (LTB), defined as patients who remain alive and free of disease progression at 24 months post treatment initiation. We show that baseline gene expression profiles were consistently able to predict long-term immunotherapy outcomes with high accuracy. The predictive value of different genes fluctuated across consecutive clinical benefit intervals, with a distinct set of genes defining benefit at 24 months compared to earlier outcomes. A 12-gene signature was able to predict LTB following anti-PD-1 therapy with an area under the curve (AUC) equal to 0.92 and 0.74 in the training and validation set, respectively. Evaluation of LTB, via a unique signature may complement objective response classification and characterize the logistics of sustained antitumor immune responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis A Vathiotis
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Leonidas Salichos
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, New York Institute of Technology, New York, USA
| | - Sandra Martinez-Morilla
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Niki Gavrielatou
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Thazin Nwe Aung
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Saba Shafi
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Pok Fai Wong
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Shlomit Jessel
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Konstantinos N Syrigos
- Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Mark Gerstein
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Qu R, Kluger Y, Yang J, Zhao J, Hafler DA, Krause DS, Bersenev A, Bosenberg M, Hurwitz M, Lucca L, Kluger HM. Longitudinal single-cell analysis of a patient receiving adoptive cell therapy reveals potential mechanisms of treatment failure. Mol Cancer 2022; 21:219. [PMID: 36514045 PMCID: PMC9749221 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-022-01688-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) is being studied in multiple tumor types. However, little is known about clonal cell expansion in vitro and persistence of the ACT product in vivo. We performed single-cell RNA and T-Cell Receptor (TCR) sequencing on serial blood and tumor samples from a patient undergoing ACT, who did not respond. We found that clonal expansion varied during preparation of the ACT product, and only one expanded clone was preserved in the ACT product. The TCR of the preserved clone which persisted and remained activated for five months was previously reported as specific for cytomegalovirus and had upregulation of granzyme family genes and genes associated with effector functions (HLA-DQB1, LAT, HLA-DQA1, and KLRD1). Clones that contracted during TIL preparation had features of exhaustion and apoptosis. At disease progression, all previously detected clonotypes were detected. New clonotypes appearing in blood or tumor at disease progression were enriched for genes associated with cytotoxicity or stemness (FGFBP2, GNLY, GZMH, GZMK, IL7R, SELL and KLF2), and these might be harnessed for alternative cellular therapy or cytokine therapy. In-depth single-cell analyses of serial samples from additional ACT-treated patients is warranted, and viral- versus tumor-specificity should be carefully analyzed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rihao Qu
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Yuval Kluger
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Junchen Yang
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Jun Zhao
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - David A. Hafler
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Diane S. Krause
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Alexey Bersenev
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Marcus Bosenberg
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA ,grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Michael Hurwitz
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Liliana Lucca
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| | - Harriet M. Kluger
- grid.47100.320000000419368710Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dey A, Austin M, Kluger HM, Trunova N, Mann H, Shire N, Morgan C, Zhou D, Mugundu GM. Association between immune-mediated adverse events and efficacy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with durvalumab and tremelimumab. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1026964. [DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1026964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeImmune-mediated adverse events (imAEs) may be associated with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We assessed the relationship between imAE development and efficacy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with durvalumab (anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 [PD-L1]) alone or in combination with tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4).MethodsThe analysis used individual patient-level data from 307 and 310 patients in the monotherapy and combination arms of MYSTIC, respectively. We evaluated the association between treatment efficacy and development of imAEs using univariate and multivariate survival analyses. Using machine learning, we built a predictive model utilizing baseline clinical and laboratory features to identify patients at risk of developing imAEs and further evaluated patient survival based on a threshold index extracted from the model.ResultsPatients who developed any grade of imAE had improved overall survival versus patients without (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41–0.62). imAE development was associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.44–0.66) in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model considering patient demographic features and baseline characteristics. Higher odds of imAE development were observed (odds ratio 3.023; 95% CI: 1.56–5.83) in responders versus non-responders in patients treated with immunotherapy. Based on baseline characteristics, the random forest classification algorithm was used to formulate a predictive model to identify patients at increased risk of developing imAEs during treatment.ConclusionPost-hoc exploratory analysis found that the efficacy of immunotherapy was improved in patients who developed on-treatment imAEs. This was independent of severity of imAEs or the need for steroid treatment, which is important in allowing patients to remain on treatment and derive optimal clinical benefit. Further research is warranted to establish the correlation between incidence of imAEs and efficacy in this patient population.
Collapse
|
22
|
Karz A, Dimitrova M, Kleffman K, Alvarez-Breckenridge C, Atkins MB, Boire A, Bosenberg M, Brastianos P, Cahill DP, Chen Q, Ferguson S, Forsyth P, Glitza Oliva IC, Goldberg SB, Holmen SL, Knisely JPS, Merlino G, Nguyen DX, Pacold ME, Perez-Guijarro E, Smalley KSM, Tawbi HA, Wen PY, Davies MA, Kluger HM, Mehnert JM, Hernando E. Melanoma central nervous system metastases: An update to approaches, challenges, and opportunities. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2022; 35:554-572. [PMID: 35912544 PMCID: PMC10171356 DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.13059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Brain metastases are the most common brain malignancy. This review discusses the studies presented at the third annual meeting of the Melanoma Research Foundation in the context of other recent reports on the biology and treatment of melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Although symptomatic MBM patients were historically excluded from immunotherapy trials, efforts from clinicians and patient advocates have resulted in more inclusive and even dedicated clinical trials for MBM patients. The results of checkpoint inhibitor trials were discussed in conversation with current standards of care for MBM patients, including steroids, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy. Advances in the basic scientific understanding of MBM, including the role of astrocytes and metabolic adaptations to the brain microenvironment, are exposing new vulnerabilities which could be exploited for therapeutic purposes. Technical advances including single-cell omics and multiplex imaging are expanding our understanding of the MBM ecosystem and its response to therapy. This unprecedented level of spatial and temporal resolution is expected to dramatically advance the field in the coming years and render novel treatment approaches that might improve MBM patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alcida Karz
- Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.,Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - Maya Dimitrova
- Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Kevin Kleffman
- Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.,Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| | | | - Michael B Atkins
- Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Marcus Bosenberg
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research NCI, NIH, USA
| | - Priscilla Brastianos
- MGH Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel P Cahill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Qing Chen
- Immunology, Microenvironment and Metastasis Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sherise Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Peter Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology and Tumor Biology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarah B Goldberg
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sheri L Holmen
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Surgery, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jonathan P S Knisely
- Meyer Cancer Center and Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Glenn Merlino
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research NCI, NIH, USA
| | - Don X Nguyen
- Department of Pathology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael E Pacold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health and NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Eva Perez-Guijarro
- Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Center for Cancer Research NCI, NIH, USA
| | - Keiran S M Smalley
- Department of Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Janice M Mehnert
- Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA
| | - Eva Hernando
- Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.,Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schoenfeld DA, Merkin RD, Moutafi M, Martinez S, Adeniran A, Kumar D, Jilaveanu L, Hurwitz M, Rimm DL, Kluger HM. Location matters: LAG3 levels are lower in renal cell carcinoma metastatic sites compared to primary tumors, and expression at metastatic sites only may have prognostic importance. Front Oncol 2022; 12:990367. [PMID: 36313654 PMCID: PMC9608089 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.990367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
While great strides have been made in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and VEGFR-targeting drugs, sizable proportions of patients still do not respond to upfront therapy and long-term responses only occur in a minority of patients. There is therefore a great need for the development of better predictors of response and an increased understanding of mechanisms of resistance to these therapies. Alternative immune checkpoints outside the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, such as LAG3, have been implicated as one mechanism of resistance to ICIs. These checkpoints thus represent attractive therapeutic targets, and indeed the LAG3 inhibitor relatlimab was recently approved for the treatment of metastatic melanoma in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy. LAG3 inhibitors are being evaluated for RCC as well. In this context, a better understanding of LAG3 expression patterns in RCC and how they relate to clinicopathologic features of disease and response to immunotherapy may give insight into mechanisms of resistance to PD-1 inhibitors and aid in the identification of subgroups of patients more likely to benefit from certain drug regimens. In this study, we assessed LAG3 protein levels in leukocytes in normal kidney adjacent to RCC, primary RCC tumors, and matched metastatic tumors, including large numbers of brain metastases. We found that LAG3 protein levels are on average lower at metastatic sites compared to matched primary tumors, and that the difference was more pronounced in patients with high-risk clinical characteristics, including those with larger primary tumor size, grade 4 tumors, IMDC poor-risk disease, and initial presentation with brain metastases. We further saw that the prognostic value of LAG3 levels varies depending on the tissue site queried (i.e., primary tumor versus metastases), and that relatively higher LAG3 levels at metastatic sites may predict a better response to immunotherapy and longer overall survival after the development of metastatic disease. These findings may have important implications for the design of future studies involving LAG3 or other immunotherapies in RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Schoenfeld
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Ross D. Merkin
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Myrto Moutafi
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Sandra Martinez
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Adebowale Adeniran
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Deepika Kumar
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Lucia Jilaveanu
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Michael Hurwitz
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - David L. Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Harriet M. Kluger
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
- *Correspondence: Harriet M. Kluger,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Perdigoto AL, Deng S, Du KC, Kuchroo M, Burkhardt DB, Tong A, Israel G, Robert ME, Weisberg SP, Kirkiles-Smith N, Stamatouli AM, Kluger HM, Quandt Z, Young A, Yang ML, Mamula MJ, Pober JS, Anderson MS, Krishnaswamy S, Herold KC. Immune cells and their inflammatory mediators modify β cells and cause checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes. JCI Insight 2022; 7:e156330. [PMID: 35925682 PMCID: PMC9536276 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.156330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) have revolutionized cancer treatment but can trigger autoimmune complications, including CPI-induced diabetes mellitus (CPI-DM), which occurs preferentially with PD-1 blockade. We found evidence of pancreatic inflammation in patients with CPI-DM with shrinkage of pancreases, increased pancreatic enzymes, and in a case from a patient who died with CPI-DM, peri-islet lymphocytic infiltration. In the NOD mouse model, anti-PD-L1 but not anti-CTLA-4 induced diabetes rapidly. RNA sequencing revealed that cytolytic IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells infiltrated islets with anti-PD-L1. Changes in β cells were predominantly driven by IFN-γ and TNF-α and included induction of a potentially novel β cell population with transcriptional changes suggesting dedifferentiation. IFN-γ increased checkpoint ligand expression and activated apoptosis pathways in human β cells in vitro. Treatment with anti-IFN-γ and anti-TNF-α prevented CPI-DM in anti-PD-L1-treated NOD mice. CPIs targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway resulted in transcriptional changes in β cells and immune infiltrates that may lead to the development of diabetes. Inhibition of inflammatory cytokines can prevent CPI-DM, suggesting a strategy for clinical application to prevent this complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Gary Israel
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, and
| | - Marie E. Robert
- Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Stuart P. Weisberg
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Angeliki M. Stamatouli
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Zoe Quandt
- Department of Medicine and
- Diabetes Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Arabella Young
- Diabetes Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | | | | - Mark S. Anderson
- Department of Medicine and
- Diabetes Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Oria VO, Zhang H, Zito CR, Rane CK, Ma XY, Provance OK, Tran TT, Adeniran A, Kluger Y, Sznol M, Bosenberg MW, Kluger HM, Jilaveanu LB. Coupled fibromodulin and SOX2 signaling as a critical regulator of metastatic outgrowth in melanoma. Cell Mol Life Sci 2022; 79:377. [PMID: 35737114 PMCID: PMC9226089 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-022-04364-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to study mechanisms controlling metastatic outgrowth of melanoma into clinically relevant lesions, a critical process responsible for the majority of melanoma deaths. To this end, we developed novel in vivo models and identified molecular events that can be ascribed to their distinct phenotypes, indolent or highly metastatic. Induction of a proliferative state at distant sites was associated with high levels of the stem-like/progenitor marker, SOX2, and required the upregulation of FMOD, an extracellular matrix component, which modulates tumor-stroma interactions. Functional studies revealed a possible link between FMOD and SOX2; dual FMOD and SOX2 silencing nearly abolished brain metastasis and had a similar effect on distant metastasis to other sites. Our in vitro data suggests that FMOD and SOX2 cooperation plays an important role in tumor vasculogenic mimicry. Furthermore, we found that FMOD and SOX2 functional roles might converge at the activation of transcriptional co-factors YAP and TAZ, possibly via crosstalk with the tumor suppressor Hippo pathway. Finally, high expression of both genes in patient specimens predicted early development of brain metastasis. Thus, our study identifies FMOD and SOX2 cooperation as a novel regulatory mechanism that might be linked functionally to melanoma metastatic competence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor O Oria
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
- Biotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hongyi Zhang
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Christopher R Zito
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
- Department of Biology, School of Arts, Sciences, Business, and Education, University of Saint Joseph, West Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Chetan K Rane
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Xian-Yong Ma
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Olivia K Provance
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Thuy T Tran
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Adebowale Adeniran
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yuval Kluger
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mario Sznol
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Marcus W Bosenberg
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA
| | - Lucia B Jilaveanu
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, SHM234E, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kluger HM, Sarnaik A, Chesney JA, Lewis KD, Weber JS, Gogas H, In GK, Terheyden PAM, Lee S, Jagasia MH, Masteller E, Qi R, Gontcharova V, Shi W, Fiaz R, Sulur G, Wu RX, Chen G, Thomas SS. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-naïve and -experienced patients with metastatic melanoma treated with lifileucel, a tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9524 Background: Cutaneous melanoma is characterized by high TMB, which is associated with increased tumor-specific neoantigen expression (Schumacher Science 2015) and an increased response rate to ICI (Yarchoan NEJM 2019). The TMB in tumors that recur/progress after ICI is not well defined. Lifileucel is a one-time, autologous TIL cell therapy under investigation for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced melanoma. We conducted a matched case-control study of prospectively enrolled pts with advanced melanoma treated with lifileucel in the ICI-naïve (IOV-COM-202 trial, Cohort 1A [C1A]) and post-ICI (C-144-01 trial, Cohort 2 [C2]) setting to investigate the potential association between prior ICI therapy, TMB, and response to lifileucel. Methods: All pts had unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Available cases from C1A (ICI-naïve pts receiving lifileucel + pembrolizumab [pembro]) were matched to controls from C2 (pts receiving lifileucel alone after progression on antiPD-1/PD-L1 therapy); 3 controls per case were matched at least for BRAF status and disease stage at study entry, and if possible, for anatomic site of tumor harvest. Lifileucel regimen was similar in C1A and C2. In C1A, 1 dose of pembro was given after tumor harvest and before nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion and resumed after lifileucel per standard treatment, for up to 2 y. Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed by investigators per RECIST v1.1. TMB of the resected tumor was measured using the ImmunoID NeXT (C1A) or PGDx elio (C2) platform; a validated conversion factor was used to compare TMB between platforms (Vega Ann Oncol 2021). High TMB was defined as ≥10 mut/MB. Results: Seven pts in C1A and 21 in C2 were included in the case-control study and had ORR of 71.4% and 38.1%, respectively. The percentage of pts with high TMB was 57.1% in C1A and 19.0% in C2 ( P = 0.1). ORR in the low and high TMB groups was 66.7% and 75.0%, respectively, in C1A and 41.1% and 25.0% in C2; 60% of responders in C1A and 12.5% in C2 had high TMB. In logistic regression analysis adjusted for cohort, TMB was not associated with response to lifileucel (odds ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.91.1; P = 0.8). Data on tumor mutations and neoantigens, T-cell receptor repertoire, and tumor microenvironment profile will be presented. Conclusions: Our preliminary data indicate that the efficacy (ORR) of lifileucel may be independent of TMB, regardless of treatment setting, consistent with its proposed immune checkpoint pathway-independent mechanism of action. The percentage of patients with high TMB tended to be lower in tumors with prior ICI exposure than in those that were ICI-naïve. Clinical trial information: NCT03645928; NCT02360579.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet M. Kluger
- Yale University School of Medicine, Smilow Cancer Center, New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Jason Alan Chesney
- James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | - Karl D. Lewis
- University of Colorado Cancer Center—Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Jeffrey S. Weber
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Helen Gogas
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Gino Kim In
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Sylvia Lee
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Rongsu Qi
- Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., San Carlos, CA
| | | | - Wen Shi
- Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., San Carlos, CA
| | - Rana Fiaz
- Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., San Carlos, CA
| | - Giri Sulur
- Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., San Carlos, CA
| | | | - Guang Chen
- Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., San Carlos, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kahn AM, Perry C, Etts K, Kluger HM, Sznol M. Clinical predictors of longer survival in patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma receiving immunotherapy prior to BRAF/MEK inhibition in the metastatic setting. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9555 Background: Patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma are typically treated with immunotherapy in the first-line setting, followed by BRAF/MEKi upon disease progression based on an absolute 20% improvement in 2-year overall survival over initial treatment with BRAF/MEKi in the DREAMseq trial. Our goal was to identify clinical predictors of longer survival for patients treated in our institution with this approach. Methods: We identified 40 patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma treated at our institution from 2011 to 2020 with immunotherapy followed by BRAF/MEKi upon progression. Clinical data were collected and analyzed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Favorable outcome was defined as survival > 2 years (y) after starting BRAF/MEKis. Results: Median follow up was 33 months (m, 3 – 172 m). Median age was 54 y (20 - 83). Most patients were female (n = 24, %). Most patients were initially treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 34, 85%), with 13 of these patients (38%) tolerating all 4 cycles of initial ipilimumab. Adverse events of any grade were seen in 28 (70%) patients after first-line immunotherapy, with the most common being hepatitis, colitis, hypothyroidism, rash, and fatigue. Median duration of first-line immunotherapy was 3.5 m (.75 - 42.5 m). Most common sites of progression on immunotherapy were lymph nodes (n = 14, 35%), liver (n = 12, 30%), bone (n = 10, 25%) and brain (n = 10, 25%). Prior to BRAF/MEKis, median ECOG-PS was 1 (0-4) and median LDH was 268 mg/dL (151 - 11,300). Most common BRAF/MEKi regimen was dabrafenib plus trametinib (n = 34, 85%). Adverse events of any grade were seen in 30 (75%) patients, with the most common being fever, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. Best response to BRAF/MEKi was CR (n = 4, 10%), PR (n = 26, 65%), SD (n = 4, 10%) and PD (n = 6, 15%), and at the data cutoff, 35 (87.5%) patients progressed on BRAF/MEKi. Median duration of BRAF/MEK inhibition was 7 m (0.5 – 106 m). Median survival since starting BRAF/MEKi was 19.2 m (1.7 – 106 m). On multivariable analyses assessing predictors of survival, presence of bone metastases after disease progression on first-line immunotherapy was associated with worse 2-year survival after initiation of BRAF/MEKi (OR 2.5, 95% CI, 0.51-5.6, p = 0.0121). Other factors, such as ECOG-PS 0-2, normal LDH prior to BRAF/MEKi, and age at metastatic diagnosis < 60 years were not significantly associated with longer survival after initiation of BRAF/MEKi. Conclusions: We showed that the presence of bone metastases upon progression on first-line immunotherapy was associated with worse 2-y survival on salvage BRAF/MEKi for patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers for long-term response to both immunotherapy and BRAF/MEKi are needed to optimize treatment strategies and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Mario Sznol
- Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital of the Yale–New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Guo X, Jessel S, Qu R, Kluger Y, Chen TM, Hollander L, Safirstein R, Nelson B, Cha C, Bosenberg M, Jilaveanu LB, Rimm D, Rothlin CV, Kluger HM, Desir GV. Inhibition of renalase drives tumour rejection by promoting T cell activation. Eur J Cancer 2022; 165:81-96. [PMID: 35219026 PMCID: PMC8940682 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors have revolutionised treatment for advanced melanoma, not all patients respond. We previously showed that inhibition of the flavoprotein renalase (RNLS) in preclinical melanoma models decreases tumour growth. We hypothesised that RNLS inhibition promotes tumour rejection by effects on the tumour microenvironment (TME). METHODS We used two distinct murine melanoma models, studied in RNLS knockout (KO) or wild-type (WT) mice. WT mice were treated with the anti-RNLS antibody, m28, with or without anti-PD-1. 10X single-cell RNA-sequencing was used to identify transcriptional differences between treatment groups, and tumour cell content was interrogated by flow cytometry. Samples from patients treated with immunotherapy were examined for RNLS expression by quantitative immunofluorescence. RESULTS RNLS KO mice injected with wild-type melanoma cells reject their tumours, supporting the importance of RNLS in cells in the TME. This effect was blunted by anti-cluster of differentiation 3. However, MØ-specific RNLS ablation was insufficient to abrogate tumour formation. Anti-RNLS antibody treatment of melanoma-bearing mice resulted in enhanced T cell infiltration and activation and resulted in immune memory on rechallenging mice with injection of melanoma cells. At the single-cell level, treatment with anti-RNLS antibodies resulted in increased tumour density of MØ, neutrophils and lymphocytes and increased expression of IFNγ and granzyme B in natural killer cells and T cells. Intratumoural Forkhead Box P3 + CD4 cells were decreased. In two distinct murine melanoma models, we showed that melanoma-bearing mice treated with anti-RNLS antibodies plus anti-PD-1 had superior tumour shrinkage and survival than with either treatment alone. Importantly, in pretreatment samples from patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors, high RNLS expression was associated with decreased survival (log-rank P = 0.006), independent of other prognostic variables. CONCLUSIONS RNLS KO results in melanoma tumour regression in a T-cell-dependent fashion. Anti-RNLS antibodies enhance anti-PD-1 activity in two distinct aggressive murine melanoma models resistant to PD-1 inhibitors, supporting the development of anti-RNLS antibodies with PD-1 inhibitors as a novel approach for melanomas poorly responsive to anti-PD-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojia Guo
- Department of Medicine Section of Nephrology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Shlomit Jessel
- Department of Medicine Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Rihao Qu
- Department of Medicine Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yuval Kluger
- Department of Medicine Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Tian-Min Chen
- Department of Medicine Section of Nephrology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lindsay Hollander
- Department of Medicine Section of Nephrology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Robert Safirstein
- Department of Medicine Section of Nephrology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Medicine VACHS, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Bryce Nelson
- Department of Medicine Pharmacology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Charles Cha
- Department of Medicine Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Marcus Bosenberg
- Department of Medicine Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lucia B Jilaveanu
- Department of Medicine Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David Rimm
- Department of Medicine Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Carla V Rothlin
- Department of Medicine Immunology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Gary V Desir
- Department of Medicine Section of Nephrology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Medicine VACHS, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Medicine Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Baker ML, Yamamoto Y, Perazella MA, Dizman N, Shirali AC, Hafez N, Weinstein J, Simonov M, Testani JM, Kluger HM, Cantley LG, Parikh CR, Wilson FP, Moledina DG. Mortality after acute kidney injury and acute interstitial nephritis in patients prescribed immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-004421. [PMID: 35354588 PMCID: PMC8968986 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, acute kidney injury (AKI) is common, and can occur either from kidney injury unrelated to ICI use or from immune activation resulting in acute interstitial nephritis (AIN). In this study, we test the hypothesis that occurrence of AIN indicates a favorable treatment response to ICI therapy and therefore among patients who develop AKI while on ICI therapy, those with AIN will demonstrate greater survival compared with others with AKI. METHODS In this observational cohort study, we included participants initiated on ICI therapy between 2013 and 2019. We tested the independent association of AKI and estimated AIN (eAIN) with mortality up to 1 year after therapy initiation as compared with those without AKI using time-varying Cox proportional hazard models controlling for demographics, comorbidities, cancer type, stage, and therapy, and baseline laboratory values. We defined eAIN as those with a predicted probability of AIN >90th percentile derived from a recently validated diagnostic model. RESULTS Of 2207 patients initiated on ICIs, 617 (28%) died at 1 year and 549 (25%) developed AKI. AKI was independently associated with higher mortality (adjusted HR, 2.28 (95% CI 1.90 to 2.72)). Those AKI patients with eAIN had more severe AKI as reflected by a higher peak serum creatinine (3.3 (IQR 2.1-6.1) vs 1.4 (1.2-1.9) mg/dL, p<0.001) but exhibited lower mortality than those without eAIN in univariable analysis (HR 0.43 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.89)) and after adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and cancer type and severity (adjusted HR 0.44 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.93)). CONCLUSION In patients treated with ICI, mortality was higher in those with AKI unrelated to ICI but lower in those where the underlying etiology was AIN. Future studies could evaluate the association of biopsy-proven or biomarker-proven AIN with mortality in those receiving ICI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan L Baker
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yu Yamamoto
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mark A Perazella
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nazli Dizman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Anushree C Shirali
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Navid Hafez
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jason Weinstein
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael Simonov
- Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Testani
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lloyd G Cantley
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Chirag R Parikh
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - F Perry Wilson
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Dennis G Moledina
- Section of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Jessel S, Weiss SA, Austin M, Mahajan A, Etts K, Zhang L, Aizenbud L, Perdigoto AL, Hurwitz M, Sznol M, Herold KC, Kluger HM. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Hypophysitis and Patterns of Loss of Pituitary Function. Front Oncol 2022; 12:836859. [PMID: 35350573 PMCID: PMC8958012 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.836859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are clinically active across multiple tumor types but the associated immune-related adverse events (irAEs) lead to treatment delays or discontinuation and negatively impact quality-of-life. Hypophysitis is often a permanent irAE that may affect multiple pituitary hormonal axes. Here we comprehensively characterize our institution's clinical experience with ICI-induced hypophysitis and the associated patterns of pituitary function loss. Methods Patients with solid tumors, mostly melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC), treated with ICI at Yale Cancer Center were prospectively enrolled from October 2016-May 2021. Demographics and clinical data were obtained from the medical record including type and timing of irAEs. Patients were included in this cohort if hypophysitis was diagnosed by pre-specified biochemical and clinical parameters. Results The overall incidence of hypophysitis was 69/490 (14%) in patients with melanoma (n=58, 84%), RCC (n=10,14%), and merkel cell carcinoma (n=1, 1%) who received ipilimumab plus nivolumab (77%; 53/69), anti-PD-(L)1 (17%; 12/69), or ipilimumab monotherapy (6%; 4/69). Of the 69 patients analyzed, median time to hypophysitis on combination ICI versus anti-PD-1 was 2.8 vs. 4.1 months. The incidence of hypophysitis in patients with melanoma was 25% (46/187) with ipilimumab plus nivolumab and 5% (7/129) with anti-PD-(L)1 compared to 9% (7/77) and 8% (3/37), respectively, in patients with RCC. Patients who developed hypophysitis on combination ICI had a higher rate of headache (p=0.05) and co-occurring irAEs (p=0.01) compared anti-PD-(L1)1 monotherapy. At a median follow-up of 2.2 years, 77% of patients were alive. Objective response rates to ICI in melanoma patients were higher than previously reported for unselected populations. Central hypothyroidism and hypogonadism were the most common pituitary axes affected after the adrenal axis. In select cases, there was evidence of spontaneous rebound in free testosterone levels after an initial decline. Conclusions We demonstrate a higher rate of ICI-induced hypophysitis than previously reported, which may be reflective of real-world practice due to increased awareness as experience with ICI has grown. In select cases, there was evidence of rebound in free testosterone and/or gonadotropins but not in adrenal axis hormones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shlomit Jessel
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Sarah A. Weiss
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Matthew Austin
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Amit Mahajan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Katrina Etts
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Lin Zhang
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Lilach Aizenbud
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Ana Luisa Perdigoto
- Department of Medicine (Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Michael Hurwitz
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Mario Sznol
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Kevan C. Herold
- Department of Medicine (Endocrinology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Harriet M. Kluger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pauken KE, Lagattuta KA, Lu BY, Lucca LE, Daud AI, Hafler DA, Kluger HM, Raychaudhuri S, Sharpe AH. TCR-sequencing in cancer and autoimmunity: barcodes and beyond. Trends Immunol 2022; 43:180-194. [PMID: 35090787 PMCID: PMC8882139 DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The T cell receptor (TCR) endows T cells with antigen specificity and is central to nearly all aspects of T cell function. Each naïve T cell has a unique TCR sequence that is stably maintained during cell division. In this way, the TCR serves as a molecular barcode that tracks processes such as migration, differentiation, and proliferation of T cells. Recent technological advances have enabled sequencing of the TCR from single cells alongside deep molecular phenotypes on an unprecedented scale. In this review, we discuss strengths and limitations of TCR sequences as molecular barcodes and their application to study immune responses following Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) blockade in cancer. Additionally, we consider applications of TCR data beyond use as a barcode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen E. Pauken
- Department of Immunology, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Evergrande Center for Immunological Diseases, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Correspondence: (A. H. Sharpe); (K. E. Pauken)
| | - Kaitlyn A. Lagattuta
- Center for Data Sciences, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Y. Lu
- Department of Neurology and Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Liliana E. Lucca
- Department of Neurology and Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Current Address: Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Adil I. Daud
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David A. Hafler
- Department of Neurology and Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Soumya Raychaudhuri
- Center for Data Sciences, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Centre for Genetics and Genomics Versus Arthritis, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Arlene H. Sharpe
- Department of Immunology, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Evergrande Center for Immunological Diseases, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Correspondence: (A. H. Sharpe); (K. E. Pauken)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Among solid tumors, melanoma has the highest propensity for brain dissemination. Although newer treatment approaches have resulted in excellent control or elimination of brain metastasis in many patients, they remain the cause of significant morbidity and mortality. Here, we review recent preclinical and clinical studies to detail current understanding of the incidence, prognosis, biological characteristics, and treatments for melanoma brain metastases. RECENT FINDINGS Clinical trials tailored to this patient population have demonstrated prolonged disease control with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging clinical challenges include radiation necrosis and perilesional edema, phenomena that are rarely seen in other organs. Recent preclinical studies have resulted in improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment in the brain, providing insights into additional treatment approaches. The biological basis of brain tumor homing and survival within the central nervous system remain understudied. Additional preclinical and clinical studies will enhance our ability to prevent and treat brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine I Caulfield
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Heng JS, Kim JM, Jones DK, Stoessel KM, Weiss SA, Sznol M, Kluger HM, Walter SD, Silverstein NA, Pointdujour-Lim R. Autoimmune retinopathy with associated anti-retinal antibodies as a potential immune-related adverse event associated with immunotherapy in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma: case series and systematic review. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2022; 7:e000889. [PMID: 35047671 PMCID: PMC8724805 DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the spectrum of autoimmune retinopathy (AIR) associated with immunotherapy for advanced cutaneous melanoma. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Retrospective chart review on patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma who developed AIR after initiating immunotherapy. Complete ophthalmic examination and relevant ancillary testing were performed on each patient. The presence of AIR-associated anti-retinal antibodies was confirmed by western blot and/or immunohistochemical staining. Ophthalmic and systemic outcomes after treatment for AIR were followed over time. A systematic review of AIR associated with immunotherapy for cutaneous or non-ocular mucosal melanoma was carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS Case 1 developed photopsia and nyctalopia with electroretinographic findings characteristic for melanoma-associated retinopathy 1 week after initiating ipilimumab/nivolumab immunotherapy. Case 2 experienced new severe bilateral visual field loss associated with anti-retinal and anti-optic nerve antibodies while on maintenance nivolumab immunotherapy. Case 3 developed decreased visual acuity due to acute exudative polymorphous vitelliform maculopathy within 2 weeks of initiating ipilimumab/nivolumab immunotherapy. All patients had concurrent extraocular immune-related adverse events in addition to the presence of anti-retinal antibodies on serological testing. 14 published cases of AIR associated with immunotherapy for cutaneous or non-ocular mucosal melanoma were identified and reviewed. CONCLUSIONS Immune checkpoint inhibition can trigger the development of AIR with varied clinical manifestations in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma. This study highlights the need for close monitoring in cutaneous melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy who develop new visual symptoms with or without funduscopic changes, as well as the potential role for screening of patients prior to initiating immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob S Heng
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jenna M Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - D Kyle Jones
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kathleen M Stoessel
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sarah A Weiss
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mario Sznol
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Scott D Walter
- Retina Consultants, P.C, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
- Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Renelle Pointdujour-Lim
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lu BY, Gupta R, Aguirre-Ducler A, Gianino N, Wyatt H, Ribeiro M, Chiang VL, Contessa JN, Adeniran AJ, Jilaveanu LB, Kluger HM, Schalper KA, Goldberg SB. Spatially resolved analysis of the T cell immune contexture in lung cancer-associated brain metastases. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-002684. [PMID: 34670827 PMCID: PMC8529973 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite unique genetic alterations within brain metastases (BrMs) and an immunologically distinct surrounding microenvironment, the composition and functional properties of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes within BrM remain largely unexplored. In particular, the expression of coinhibitory receptors, such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), T cell immunoglobulin mucin receptor 3 (TIM-3), and lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3), within BrMs is unknown. Using multiplexed quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF), this study evaluates the localized expression of PD-L1, level and functional profile of major T cell subsets, and coinhibitory receptors within lung cancer-associated BrMs and primary lung tumors. Clinicopathologically annotated samples from 95 patients with lung cancer between 2002 and 2015 were represented in a tissue microarray format. Spatially resolved and multiplexed QIF was used to evaluate PD-L1 protein, phenotype markers for major T cell subsets (CD3, CD4, CD8, and FOXP3), cell-localized activation and proliferation markers (granzyme B and Ki67), and coinhibitory receptors (PD-1, LAG-3, and TIM-3). The signal for each marker was measured in marker-selected tissue compartments, and associations between marker levels, tumor location, and major clinicopathological variables were studied. In total, 41 primary lung tumors and 65 BrMs were analyzed, including paired samples from 11 patients. Levels of tumor PD-L1 expression were comparable between BrMs and primary lung tumors. BrMs had significantly lower levels of all T cell subsets relative to primary lung tumors, and T cells in BrMs displayed lower levels of granzyme B than primary lesions. PD-1, TIM-3, and LAG-3 levels in CD3+ T-cells were also significantly lower in BrMs. Marker expression in patients with paired samples from BrMs and primary lung tumors showed comparable results. High CD3+ T-cells, as well as high levels of TIM-3 and LAG-3 in CD3+ T-cells, were associated with longer overall survival in BrMs but not primary lung tumors. Lung cancer-associated BrMs display lower T cell infiltration, markers of cytolytic function, and immune regulatory signals than primary lung tumors. Despite these differences, high TIM-3 and high LAG-3 expressions in CD3+ T-cells were associated with longer survival. These features are accompanied by comparable levels of PD-L1 protein expression compared with primary lung tumors. These results highlight unique aspects of the tumor immune microenvironment within the brain and provide further support for intracranially focused therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Y Lu
- Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Richa Gupta
- Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Nicole Gianino
- Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Hailey Wyatt
- Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Matthew Ribeiro
- Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Joseph N Contessa
- Radiation Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.,Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Lucia B Jilaveanu
- Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kurt A Schalper
- Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sarah B Goldberg
- Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Zhang SM, Cai WL, Liu X, Thakral D, Luo J, Chan LH, McGeary MK, Song E, Blenman KRM, Micevic G, Jessel S, Zhang Y, Yin M, Booth CJ, Jilaveanu LB, Damsky W, Sznol M, Kluger HM, Iwasaki A, Bosenberg MW, Yan Q. KDM5B promotes immune evasion by recruiting SETDB1 to silence retroelements. Nature 2021; 598:682-687. [PMID: 34671158 PMCID: PMC8555464 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03994-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Tumours use various strategies to evade immune surveillance1,2. Immunotherapies targeting tumour immune evasion such as immune checkpoint blockade have shown considerable efficacy on multiple cancers3,4 but are ineffective for most patients due to primary or acquired resistance5-7. Recent studies showed that some epigenetic regulators suppress anti-tumour immunity2,8-12, suggesting that epigenetic therapies could boost anti-tumour immune responses and overcome resistance to current immunotherapies. Here we show that, in mouse melanoma models, depletion of KDM5B-an H3K4 demethylase that is critical for melanoma maintenance and drug resistance13-15-induces robust adaptive immune responses and enhances responses to immune checkpoint blockade. Mechanistically, KDM5B recruits the H3K9 methyltransferase SETDB1 to repress endogenous retroelements such as MMVL30 in a demethylase-independent manner. Derepression of these retroelements activates cytosolic RNA-sensing and DNA-sensing pathways and the subsequent type-I interferon response, leading to tumour rejection and induction of immune memory. Our results demonstrate that KDM5B suppresses anti-tumour immunity by epigenetic silencing of retroelements. We therefore reveal roles of KDM5B in heterochromatin regulation and immune evasion in melanoma, opening new paths for the development of KDM5B-targeting and SETDB1-targeting therapies to enhance tumour immunogenicity and overcome immunotherapy resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shang-Min Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Wesley L. Cai
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Current address: Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Xiaoni Liu
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Durga Thakral
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jiesi Luo
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale Cardiovascular Research Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lok Hei Chan
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Meaghan K. McGeary
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Eric Song
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kim RM Blenman
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Goran Micevic
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Shlomit Jessel
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yangyi Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Department of Dermatology, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease, Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Mingzhu Yin
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Department of Dermatology, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease, Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Carmen J. Booth
- Department of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lucia B. Jilaveanu
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - William Damsky
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mario Sznol
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Harriet M. Kluger
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Center for Immuno-Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Akiko Iwasaki
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Center for Immuno-Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| | - Marcus W. Bosenberg
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Center for Immuno-Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Corresponding authors: ,
| | - Qin Yan
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Stem Cell Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Yale Center for Immuno-Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA,Corresponding authors: ,
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yang C, Shuch B, Kluger HM, Serrano M, Kibel AS, Humphrey PA, Adeniran AJ. Adverse Histopathologic Characteristics in Small Papillary Renal Cell Carcinomas Have Minimal Impact on Prognosis. Am J Clin Pathol 2021; 156:550-558. [PMID: 34424955 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Tumor size has long been used in the management decision-making of patients with renal masses. Active surveillance had recently gained traction in selected patients with tumor size of 4 cm or less. Adverse histopathologic characteristics in papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) have been shown to correlate with worse prognosis. We aimed to study whether such features in small PRCCs provide additional prognostic information. METHODS Nephrectomies from our institution were collected and reviewed to evaluate for adverse histopathologic features. Clinical follow-up information was collected for all cases. Relationships between the variables were examined by Wilcoxon test and logistic regression. RESULTS We identified 291 consecutive cases of PRCC. Adverse tumor histopathologic characteristics were significantly related to size. In PRCCs with size greater than 4 cm, there were more cases with high World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology grade and necrosis. Adverse histologic features are less commonly seen in small PRCC and are not associated with lower disease-free survival or disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS Identification of these features in small PRCCs (≤4 cm) through needle core biopsy examination would not provide additional prognostic information in patients for whom active surveillance is considered. Clinical and radiologic follow-up in patients with small renal masses that have a known histologic diagnosis of PRCC should be sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Yang
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Brian Shuch
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Adam S Kibel
- Department of Urology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter A Humphrey
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Uezono H, Nam D, Kluger HM, Sznol M, Hurwitz M, Yu JB, Chiang VL. Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients With Brain Metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 44:495-501. [PMID: 34432667 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The impact of immunotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in treatment of brain metastases (BM) from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has not been well investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-eight patients with 372 RCC BM were treated with SRS and divided into those ever treated with immunotherapy versus those who never received immunotherapy. Survival and local control (LC) outcomes were studied. χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests compared categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival and log-rank test was used to compare survival between groups. RESULTS Immunotherapy and nonimmunotherapy groups contained 29 and 19 patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 23.1 months (range, 6 to 93.8 mo). Demographic and treatment variables were similar except median prescribed margin dose was significantly lower in immunotherapy group (20 vs. 22 Gy, P<0.0001). Median overall survival (OS) was 27.2 months (immunotherapy) and 14.9 months (nonimmunotherapy), P=0.14. Furthermore, patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) had even better median OS compared with those who never received ICI (33 vs. 16.7 mo, P=0.03). Factors associated with improved LC were use of ICI (P=0.002) and lesion size <1000 mm3 (P=0.046). There was no difference in incidence of radiation necrosis between the 2 groups (P=0.67). CONCLUSIONS Patients with RCC BM undergoing SRS can experience prolonged survival when treated with ICI. Equally effective LC of BM was achieved when treated with immunotherapy using a 2 Gy decrease in SRS dose without increasing the risk of central nervous system toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haruka Uezono
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan
| | | | | | - Mario Sznol
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - James B Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Weiss SA, Djureinovic D, Jessel S, Krykbaeva I, Zhang L, Jilaveanu L, Ralabate A, Johnson B, Levit NS, Anderson G, Zelterman D, Wei W, Mahajan A, Trifan O, Bosenberg M, Kaech SM, Perry CJ, Damsky W, Gettinger S, Sznol M, Hurwitz M, Kluger HM. A Phase I Study of APX005M and Cabiralizumab with or without Nivolumab in Patients with Melanoma, Kidney Cancer, or Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Resistant to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:4757-4767. [PMID: 34140403 PMCID: PMC9236708 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are approved for multiple tumor types. However, resistance poses substantial clinical challenges. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a phase I trial of CD40 agonist APX005M (sotigalimab) and CSF1R inhibitor cabiralizumab with or without nivolumab using a 3+3 dose-escalation design (NCT03502330). Patients were enrolled from June 2018 to April 2019. Eligibility included patients with biopsy-proven advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who progressed on anti-PD-1/PD-L1. APX005M was dose escalated (0.03, 0.1, or 0.3 mg/kg i.v.) with a fixed dose of cabiralizumab with or without nivolumab every 2 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. RESULTS Twenty-six patients (12 melanoma, 1 NSCLC, and 13 RCC) were enrolled in six cohorts, 17 on nivolumab-containing regimens. Median duration of follow-up was 21.3 months. The most common treatment-related adverse events were asymptomatic elevations of lactate dehydrogenase (n = 26), creatine kinase (n = 25), aspartate aminotransferase (n = 25), and alanine aminotransferase (n = 19); periorbital edema (n = 17); and fatigue (n = 13). One dose-limiting toxicity (acute respiratory distress syndrome) occurred in cohort 2. The recommended phase 2 dose was APX005M 0.3 mg/kg, cabiralizumab 4 mg/kg, and nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks. Median days on treatment were 66 (range, 23-443). Median cycles were 4.5 (range, 2-21). One patient had unconfirmed partial response (4%), 8 stable disease (31%), 16 disease progression (62%), and 1 unevaluable (4%). Pro-inflammatory cytokines were upregulated 4 hours post-infusion. CD40 and MCSF increased after therapy. CONCLUSIONS This first in-human study of patients with anti-PD-1/PD-L1-resistant tumors treated with dual macrophage-polarizing therapy, with or without nivolumab demonstrated safety and pharmacodynamic activity. Optimization of the dosing frequency and sequence of this combination is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Weiss
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| | - Dijana Djureinovic
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Shlomit Jessel
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Irina Krykbaeva
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lin Zhang
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lucia Jilaveanu
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Amanda Ralabate
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Barbara Johnson
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Neta Shanwetter Levit
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Gail Anderson
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Daniel Zelterman
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Amit Mahajan
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Marcus Bosenberg
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Susan M Kaech
- NOMIS Center for Immunobiology and Microbial Pathogenesis, Salk Institute, La Jolla, California
| | - Curtis J Perry
- Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - William Damsky
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Scott Gettinger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Mario Sznol
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Michael Hurwitz
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chesney JA, Larkin JM, Kirkwood JM, Weber JS, Khushalani NI, Lewis K, Medina TM, Kluger HM, Thomas SS, Domingo-Musibay E, Oláh J, Whitman ED, Martin-Algarra S, Corrie PG, Lutzky J, Hamid O, Shi W, Wu X, Jagasia M, Finckenstein FG, Fardis M, Sarnaik AA. Abstract CT008: Lifileucel (LN-144), a cryopreserved autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy in patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma: durable duration of response at 28 month follow up. Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2021-ct008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Beneficial treatment options are limited for advanced melanoma patients who progress after or do not respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies. Lifileucel is an adoptive cell therapy using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), that has shown efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma who have progressed on/after anti-PD-1therapy (Sarnaik et al., ASCO 2020). We present the 28-month (mos) follow-up data here. Methods C-144-01 (NCT02360579) is a global Phase 2 open-label, multicenter study of efficacy and safety of lifileucel in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma who have progressed on anti-PD-1 therapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, if BRAF V600 mutant. We report on Cohort 2 (N = 66) patients who have received lifileucel. Tumors were resected at local institutions, processed in central GMP facilities for TIL production, manufactured, cryopreserved and shipped back to sites in a 22-day process. Therapy consisted of one week of nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion using cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg on Day -7, -6) and fludarabine (25 mg/m2 on Day -5 through -1), a single infusion of lifileucel, and up to six doses of IL-2 doses (600,000 IU/kg/dose). Objective response rate (ORR) was based on RECIST v1.1 as assessed by investigators. Data cutoff was December 14, 2020. Results Baseline characteristics: 3.3 mean prior therapies (100% anti-PD-1; 80% anti-CTLA-4; 23% BRAF/MEK inhibitor), high baseline tumor burden (106 mm mean target lesion sum of diameters), 42% liver/brain lesions, 40.9% had LDH > ULN. Median time from last therapy to tumor harvest was 2.2 mos and 58% of the tumors resected were extra-nodal or non-skin/subcutaneous. ORR by Investigator was 36.4% (3 CR, 21 PR). One patient converted from a PR to CR at 24 mo after lifileucel therapy. Median time to first response was 1.4 mos (range: 1.3-5.6 mos). Median duration of response (mDOR) was still not reached at median follow-up of 28 mos (DOR range: 2.2-35.2 mos). No new safety risks have been identified for lifileucel during the long-term follow-up. Exploratory analyses of product-specific characteristics, including levels of phenotypic markers of T-cell lineage, memory subset, youth, activation/exhaustion, or trafficking did not demonstrate association with response. Conclusions Lifileucel treatment results in a 36.4% ORR and mDOR was not reached at 28 mo of median study follow up in heavily pretreated advanced melanoma patients with high baseline disease burden who progressed on multiple prior therapies, including anti-PD1 and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, if BRAF V600 mutant.
Citation Format: Jason Alan Chesney, James M. Larkin, John M. Kirkwood, Jeffrey S. Weber, Nikhil I. Khushalani, Karl Lewis, Theresa M. Medina, Harriet M. Kluger, Sajeve S. Thomas, Evidio Domingo-Musibay, Judit Oláh, Eric D. Whitman, Salvador Martin-Algarra, Philippa G. Corrie, Jose Lutzky, Omid Hamid, Wen Shi, Xiao Wu, Madan Jagasia, Friedrich Graf Finckenstein, Maria Fardis, Amod A. Sarnaik. Lifileucel (LN-144), a cryopreserved autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy in patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) melanoma: durable duration of response at 28 month follow up [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT008.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Alan Chesney
- 1James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | - James M. Larkin
- 2The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - John M. Kirkwood
- 3Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jeffrey S. Weber
- 4Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Karl Lewis
- 6University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | - Sajeve S. Thomas
- 8Orlando Health Cancer Institute - University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Orlando, FL
| | | | - Judit Oláh
- 10University of Szeged - Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Center, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | | | - Philippa G. Corrie
- 13Addenbrooke Hospital - Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jose Lutzky
- 14University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (formerly Mount Sinai Medical Center,), Miami, FL
| | - Omid Hamid
- 15The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, a Cedars Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Wen Shi
- 16Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., San Carlos, CA
| | - Xiao Wu
- 16Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., San Carlos, CA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dumbrava EE, Dougan ML, Gupta S, Cappelli L, Katsumoto TR, Rahma OE, Painter J, Wang Y, Suarez-Almazor ME, Reid P, Wesley SF, Hafler DA, Bingham CO, Warner BM, Chung L, Ott PA, Kluger HM, Khosroshahi A, Tawbi HAH, Sharon E. A phase 1b study of nivolumab in patients with autoimmune disorders and advanced malignancies (AIM-NIVO). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps2676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS2676 Background: Nivolumab is an anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody approved for treatment of an increasing number of solid tumors and hematological malignancies. However, patients (pts) with history of autoimmune disorders are excluded from the majority of clinical trials testing immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as anti-PD1/anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Consequently, the risks of flare ups, worsening of pre-existing autoimmune disorders or risk of de-novo immune related adverse events (irAEs) in pts with dysfunctional immune systems and tumor types who otherwise stand to benefit from ICI therapy are largely unknown, posing a challenge for oncologists. We are conducting a phase Ib study to test the hypothesis that nivolumab can be safely administered to pts with varying severity of Dermatomyositis, Systemic Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Multiple Sclerosis and other autoimmune disorders (AIM-Nivo). Methods: AIM-Nivo is an open-label, multi-center ongoing phase Ib study with nivolumab 480mg IV every 28 days in pts with autoimmune diseases and advanced malignancies (NCT03816345). The study has autoimmune disease-specific cohorts overseen by a multidisciplinary group of experts. The primary objective is to assess the overall safety and toxicity profile of nivolumab in pts with autoimmune disorders and advanced malignancies. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the antitumor efficacy; the impact of nivolumab on the autoimmune disease severity indices; and to explore potential biomarkers of response, resistance, or toxicity for each of the autoimmune disease-specific cohorts. Key overall inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic malignancies in which ICI are approved or have shown clinical activity. Key overall exclusion criteria include prior therapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. Specific eligibility criteria are defined for each disease-specific cohort. For each autoimmune disorder, severity level of the disease as defined by disease-specific severity indices will be assessed, and up to a total of 12 pts will be included in each disease cohort at each severity level (max 36 pts per cohort). Primary endpoints are dose-limiting toxicities, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. Continuous monitoring of toxicity will be conducted. Key secondary endpoints are best objective response per RECIST1.1; progression free and overall survival; and cohort specific tumor tissue, blood, and non-tumor tissue-based biomarkers. The AIM-Nivo trial opened in May 2019 and is enrolling pts through the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN), Early Drug Development Opportunity Program (EDDOP), and Create Access to Targeted Cancer Therapy for Underserved Populations (CATCH-UP) sites. Clinical trial information: NCT03816345.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sarthak Gupta
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | - Jeane Painter
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yinghong Wang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maria E. Suarez-Almazor
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Sarah F. Wesley
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Blake M Warner
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Lorinda Chung
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | | | - Harriet M. Kluger
- Yale School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Larkin J, Sarnaik A, Chesney JA, Khushalani NI, Kirkwood JM, Weber JS, Lewis KD, Medina TM, Kluger HM, Thomas SS, Domingo-Musibay E, Olah J, Whitman ED, Martin-Algarra S, Corrie PG, Lutzky J, Shi W, Wu RX, Fardis M, Hamid O. Lifileucel (LN-144), a cryopreserved autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy in patients with advanced melanoma: Evaluation of impact of prior anti-PD-1 therapy. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.9505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9505 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have become standard of care for treatment of metastatic melanoma. Most patients with advanced melanoma progress on ICI and treatment options are limited for these patients. Progression may be through primary resistance (lack of response) or secondary resistance (initial response then progression). Lifileucel is an adoptive cell therapy using TIL, that has shown efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma who progress on/after an anti-PD-1 (Sarnaik, 2020). We present the 28-month (mos) follow-up data and highlight the impact of prior anti-PD-1 response and duration of exposure on outcome with lifileucel. Methods: C-144-01 is a Phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of efficacy and safety of lifileucel in patients with advanced melanoma who have progressed on anti-PD-1 therapy and BRAFi ± MEKi, if BRAF V600+. We report long-term follow up on Cohort 2 (N = 66). Tumors were resected at local sites, processed in central GMP facilities for TIL production in a 22-day manufacturing process. Therapy consisted of nonmyeloablative lymphodepletion using 2 days of cyclophosphamide and 5 days of fludarabine, a single infusion of lifileucel, and up to six doses of IL-2. Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed by RECIST 1.1. Data cutoff was Dec. 14, 2020. Results: Baseline characteristics: 3.3 mean prior therapies (100% anti-PD-1; 80% anti-CTLA-4; 23% BRAFi/MEKi), high baseline tumor burden (106 mm mean target lesion SOD), 42% liver/brain lesions, 40.9% LDH > ULN. ORR by investigator was 36.4% (3 CR, one new CR developed at 24 mos; 21 PR). Median duration of response (mDOR) was not reached at median follow-up of 28 mos (DOR range: 2.2- 35.2 mos). In responders, the median cumulative duration and median prior lines of anti-PD-1 therapy was 4.4 mos (range: 1.4-22.5 mos), and 1.5 (range: 1-4). Data in Table demonstrates a meaningful increase in DOR to TIL with primary anti-PD-1 resistance and lower duration of time on prior anti-PD-1 therapy. No new safety risks have been identified for lifileucel during long-term follow-up. Conclusions: One-time lifileucel treatment results in a 36.4% ORR, and mDOR was not reached at 28 mos of median study follow up. One PR converted to a new CR at 24 months as responses continue to deepen. DOR is positively associated with primary resistance to prior anti-PD-1 therapy and with shorter cumulative prior duration of anti-PD-1 therapy. Lifileucel may offer a better clinical outcome when used earlier upon detection of progression on prior anti-PD-1 rather than retreatment with anti-PD-1 based regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT02360579. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Larkin
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey S. Weber
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone, New York, NY
| | - Karl D. Lewis
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Harriet M. Kluger
- Yale School of Medicine and Smilow Cancer Center, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | - Judit Olah
- University of Szeged Szent-Györgyi Medical University, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | | | - Philippa Gail Corrie
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Wen Shi
- Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc., San Carlos, CA
| | | | | | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sarnaik AA, Hamid O, Khushalani NI, Lewis KD, Medina T, Kluger HM, Thomas SS, Domingo-Musibay E, Pavlick AC, Whitman ED, Martin-Algarra S, Corrie P, Curti BD, Oláh J, Lutzky J, Weber JS, Larkin JMG, Shi W, Takamura T, Jagasia M, Qin H, Wu X, Chartier C, Graf Finckenstein F, Fardis M, Kirkwood JM, Chesney JA. Lifileucel, a Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Therapy, in Metastatic Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2656-2666. [PMID: 33979178 PMCID: PMC8376325 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Effective treatment options are limited for patients with advanced (metastatic or unresectable) melanoma who progress after immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies. Adoptive cell therapy using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes has demonstrated efficacy in advanced melanoma. Lifileucel is an autologous, centrally manufactured tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte product.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, A Cedars Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Karl D Lewis
- University of Colorado Cancer Center-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Theresa Medina
- University of Colorado Cancer Center-Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Yale University School of Medicine, Smilow Cancer Center, New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Sajeve S Thomas
- University of Florida Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Evidio Domingo-Musibay
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Anna C Pavlick
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Pippa Corrie
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust-Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Brendan D Curti
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute at Robert W. Franz Cancer Center, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | - Judit Oláh
- University of Szeged-Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Center, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Jose Lutzky
- Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
| | - Jeffrey S Weber
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Wen Shi
- Iovance Biotherapeutics Inc, San Carlos, CA
| | | | | | - Harry Qin
- Iovance Biotherapeutics Inc, San Carlos, CA
| | - Xiao Wu
- Iovance Biotherapeutics Inc, San Carlos, CA
| | | | | | | | - John M Kirkwood
- Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jason A Chesney
- James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Tarhini AA, Kang N, Lee SJ, Hodi FS, Cohen GI, Hamid O, Hutchins LF, Sosman JA, Kluger HM, Eroglu Z, Koon HB, Lawrence DP, Kendra KL, Minor DR, Lee CB, Albertini MR, Flaherty LE, Petrella TM, Streicher H, Sondak VK, Kirkwood JM. Immune adverse events (irAEs) with adjuvant ipilimumab in melanoma, use of immunosuppressants and association with outcome: ECOG-ACRIN E1609 study analysis. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-002535. [PMID: 33963015 PMCID: PMC8108687 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurring from adjuvant use of immunotherapy and of their management on relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes is currently not well understood. Patients and methods E1609 enrolled 1673 patients with resected high-risk melanoma and evaluated adjuvant ipilimumab 3 mg/kg (ipi3) and 10 mg/kg (ipi10) versus interferon-α. We investigated the association of irAEs and of use of immunosuppressants with RFS and OS for patients treated with ipilimumab (n=1034). Results Occurrence of grades 1–2 irAEs was associated with RFS (5 years: 52% (95% CI 47% to 56%) vs 41% (95% CI 31% to 50%) with no AE; p=0.006) and a trend toward improved OS (5 years: 75% (95% CI 71% to 79%) compared with 67% (95% CI 56% to 75%) with no AE; p=0.064). Among specific irAEs, grades 1–2 rash was most significantly associated with RFS (p=0.002) and OS (p=0.003). In multivariate models adjusting for prognostic factors, the most significant associations were seen for grades 1–2 rash with RFS (p<0.001, HR=0.70) and OS (p=0.01, HR=0.71) and for grades 1–2 endocrine+rash with RFS (p<0.001, HR=0.66) and OS (p=0.008, HR=0.7). Overall, grades 1–2 irAEs had the best prognosis in terms of RFS and OS and those with grades 3–4 had less RFS benefits and no OS advantage over no irAE. Patients experiencing grades 3–4 irAE had significantly higher exposure to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants than those with grades 1–2 (92% vs 60%; p<0.001), but no significant associations were found between corticosteroid and immunosuppressant use and RFS or OS. In investigating the impact of non-corticosteroid immunosuppressants, although there were trends toward better RFS and OS favoring cases who were not exposed, no significant associations were found. Conclusions Rash and endocrine irAEs were independent prognostic factors of RFS and OS in patients treated with adjuvant ipilimumab. Patients experiencing lower grade irAEs derived the most benefit, but we found no significant evidence supporting a negative impact of high dose corticosteroids and immunosuppressants more commonly used to manage grades 3–4 irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad A Tarhini
- Departments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center Inc, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Ni Kang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sandra J Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - F Stephen Hodi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gary I Cohen
- Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic & Research Institute, A Cedars Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Laura F Hutchins
- Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Sosman
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Zeynep Eroglu
- Departments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center Inc, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Henry B Koon
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | - David R Minor
- Sutter-California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Carrie B Lee
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Lawrence E Flaherty
- Wayne State University and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | - Vernon K Sondak
- Departments of Cutaneous Oncology and Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center Inc, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nghiem P, Bhatia S, Lipson EJ, Sharfman WH, Kudchadkar RR, Brohl AS, Friedlander PA, Daud A, Kluger HM, Reddy SA, Boulmay BC, Riker A, Burgess MA, Hanks BA, Olencki T, Kendra K, Church C, Akaike T, Ramchurren N, Shinohara MM, Salim B, Taube JM, Jensen E, Kalabis M, Fling SP, Homet Moreno B, Sharon E, Cheever MA, Topalian SL. Three-year survival, correlates and salvage therapies in patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-002478. [PMID: 33879601 PMCID: PMC8061836 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer associated with poor survival. Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway inhibitors have shown high rates of durable tumor regression compared with chemotherapy for MCC. The current study was undertaken to assess baseline and on-treatment factors associated with MCC regression and 3-year survival, and to explore the effects of salvage therapies in patients experiencing initial non-response or tumor progression after response or stable disease following first-line pembrolizumab therapy on Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network-09/KEYNOTE-017. Methods In this multicenter phase II trial, 50 patients with advanced unresectable MCC received pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. Patients were followed for a median of 31.8 months. Results Overall response rate to pembrolizumab was 58% (complete response 30%+partial response 28%; 95% CI 43.2 to 71.8). Among 29 responders, the median response duration was not reached (NR) at 3 years (range 1.0+ to 51.8+ months). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.8 months (95% CI 4.6 to 43.4) and the 3-year PFS was 39.1%. Median OS was NR; the 3-year OS was 59.4% for all patients and 89.5% for responders. Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, greater per cent tumor reduction, completion of 2 years of treatment and low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were associated with response and longer survival. Among patients with initial disease progression or those who developed progression after response or stable disease, some had extended survival with subsequent treatments including chemotherapies and immunotherapies. Conclusions This study represents the longest available follow-up from any first-line anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) therapy in MCC, confirming durable PFS and OS in a proportion of patients. After initial tumor progression or relapse following response, some patients receiving salvage therapies survived. Improving the management of anti-PD-(L)1-refractory MCC remains a challenge and a high priority. Trial registration number NCT02267603.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Nghiem
- University of Washington / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Shailender Bhatia
- University of Washington / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Evan J Lipson
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg~Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - William H Sharfman
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg~Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | | | - Adil Daud
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | | | - Adam Riker
- Louisiana State University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.,Department of Surgery, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, Maryland, USA.,DeCesaris Cancer Institute, Cancer Service Line, Luminis Health, Parole, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Brent A Hanks
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas Olencki
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kari Kendra
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | - Nirasha Ramchurren
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center / Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Bob Salim
- Axio Research, LLC, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Janis M Taube
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg~Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Steven P Fling
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center / Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Elad Sharon
- National Cancer Institute, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Martin A Cheever
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center / Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Suzanne L Topalian
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg~Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lucca LE, Axisa PP, Lu B, Harnett B, Jessel S, Zhang L, Raddassi K, Zhang L, Olino K, Clune J, Singer M, Kluger HM, Hafler DA. Circulating clonally expanded T cells reflect functions of tumor-infiltrating T cells. J Exp Med 2021; 218:e20200921. [PMID: 33651881 PMCID: PMC7933991 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20200921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between tumor and peripheral immune environments could allow longitudinal immune monitoring in cancer. Here, we examined whether T cells that share the same TCRαβ and are found in both tumor and blood can be interrogated to gain insight into the ongoing tumor T cell response. Paired transcriptome and TCRαβ repertoire of circulating and tumor-infiltrating T cells were analyzed at the single-cell level from matched tumor and blood from patients with metastatic melanoma. We found that in circulating T cells matching clonally expanded tumor-infiltrating T cells (circulating TILs), gene signatures of effector functions, but not terminal exhaustion, reflect those observed in the tumor. In contrast, features of exhaustion are displayed predominantly by tumor-exclusive T cells. Finally, genes associated with a high degree of blood-tumor TCR sharing were overexpressed in tumor tissue after immunotherapy. These data demonstrate that circulating TILs have unique transcriptional patterns that may have utility for the interrogation of T cell function in cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliana E. Lucca
- Department of Neurology and Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Pierre-Paul Axisa
- Department of Neurology and Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Benjamin Lu
- Department of Neurology and Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Brian Harnett
- Department of Neurology and Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Shlomit Jessel
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Le Zhang
- Department of Neurology and Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Khadir Raddassi
- Department of Neurology and Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Lin Zhang
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Kelly Olino
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - James Clune
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Meromit Singer
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - David A. Hafler
- Department of Neurology and Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Martinez-Morilla S, Villarroel-Espindola F, Wong PF, Toki MI, Aung TN, Pelekanou V, Bourke-Martin B, Schalper KA, Kluger HM, Rimm DL. Biomarker Discovery in Patients with Immunotherapy-Treated Melanoma with Imaging Mass Cytometry. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:1987-1996. [PMID: 33504554 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) is among the first tools with the capacity for multiplex analysis of more than 40 targets, which provides a novel approach to biomarker discovery. Here, we used IMC to characterize the tumor microenvironment of patients with metastatic melanoma who received immunotherapy in efforts to find indicative factors of treatment response. In spite of the new power of IMC, the image analysis aspects are still limited by the challenges of cell segmentation. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Here, rather than segment, we performed image analysis using a newly designed version of the AQUA software to measure marker intensity in molecularly defined compartments: tumor cells, stroma, T cells, B cells, and macrophages. IMC data were compared with quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) and digital spatial profiling. RESULTS Validation of IMC results for immune markers was confirmed by regression with additional multiplexing methods and outcome assessment. Multivariable analyses by each compartment revealed significant associations of 12 markers for progression-free survival and seven markers for overall survival (OS). The most compelling indicative biomarker, beta2-microglobulin (B2M), was confirmed by correlation with OS by QIF in the discovery cohort and validated in an independent published cohort profiled by mRNA expression. CONCLUSIONS Using digital image analysis based on pixel colocalization to assess IMC data allowed us to quantitively measure 25 markers simultaneously on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue microarray samples. In addition to showing high concordance with other multiplexing technologies, we identified a series of potentially indicative biomarkers for immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma, including B2M.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pok Fai Wong
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Maria I Toki
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Thazin Nwe Aung
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Vasiliki Pelekanou
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Kurt A Schalper
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - David L Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cheok SK, Narayan A, Arnal-Estape A, Gettinger S, Goldberg SB, Kluger HM, Nguyen D, Patel A, Chiang V. Tumor DNA Mutations From Intraparenchymal Brain Metastases Are Detectable in CSF. JCO Precis Oncol 2021; 5:PO.20.00292. [PMID: 34250381 DOI: 10.1200/po.20.00292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Revised: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Discordant responses between brain metastases and extracranial tumors can arise from branched tumor evolution, underscoring the importance of profiling mutations to optimize therapy. However, the morbidity of brain biopsies limits their use. We investigated whether cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in CSF could serve as an effective surrogate marker for genomic profiling of intraparenchymal (IP) brain metastases. METHODS CSF and blood were collected simultaneously from patients with progressive brain metastases undergoing a craniotomy or lumbar puncture. Mutations in both biofluids were measured using an error-suppressed deep sequencing method previously published by our group. Forty-three regions of 24 cancer-associated genes were assayed. RESULTS This study enrolled 14 patients with either IP brain metastases (n = 12) or cytology-positive leptomeningeal disease (LMD, n = 2) and two controls with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Primary cancer types were lung, melanoma, renal cell, and colorectal. cfDNA was measurable in all sixteen samples of CSF. Cancer-associated mutations were found in the CSF of ten patients (eight with IP [67%] and two with LMD [100%]) and plasma of five patients (five with IP [42%] and none with LMD). All patients with plasma cfDNA had extracranial tumors. Among the five patients in the cohort who also had mutation data from time-matched brain metastasis tissue, four patients (80%) had matching mutations detected in CSF and brain, whereas only one patient (20%) had matching mutations detected in plasma and brain. CONCLUSION The detection of mutational DNA in CSF is not restricted to LMD and was found in two thirds of patients with IP brain metastases in our cohort. Analysis of CSF can be a viable alternative to biopsy for detection of somatic mutations in brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Azeet Narayan
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Anna Arnal-Estape
- Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.,Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
| | - Scott Gettinger
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.,Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Sarah B Goldberg
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.,Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.,Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Don Nguyen
- Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.,Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.,Department of Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Abhijit Patel
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT.,Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
| | - Veronica Chiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT.,Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Unlu S, Grant MJ, Gettinger S, Adeniran A, Kluger HM. Prolonged Complete Response of Early Stage Primary Adenocarcinoma of the Lung to Nivolumab Monotherapy. Clin Oncol Case Rep 2021; 4:157. [PMID: 34382032 PMCID: PMC8353529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently employed for the treatment of various malignancies, including advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. As more patients are treated with checkpoint inhibitors, situations will arise in which early-stage disease may be subjected, intentionally or unintentionally, to these agents. This is especially relevant for patients presenting with multiple primary malignant tumors (MPMTs). Here we report the case of a patient presenting synchronously with metastatic melanoma to multiple regional lymph nodes and stage I lung adenocarcinoma with high Programmed-Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Given the high-risk nature of his melanoma, he was treated with nivolumab monotherapy, and had a durable response of both malignancies to a PD-1 inhibitor. He remains disease-free, off therapy sixteen months after completing a 19-month course of treatment. This highlights the complexity of treating patients with MPMTs in the era of effective immunotherapy and raises the possibility of treating primary lung cancer with systemic immunotherapy in situations in which surgery is not feasible due to comorbidities or other circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serhan Unlu
- School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Michael J Grant
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Scott Gettinger
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Adebowale Adeniran
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harriet M Kluger
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jessel S, Austin M, Kluger HM. Mycophenolate as Primary Treatment for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Induced Acute Kidney Injury in a Patient with Concurrent Immunotherapy-Associated Diabetes: A Case Report. Clin Oncol Case Rep 2021; 4:156. [PMID: 33763663 PMCID: PMC7985664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors enhance T cell response against malignant cells and are standard of care in many tumor types. Disinhibition of cytotoxic T cells in normal organs and inhibition of regulatory T cells can lead to immune-related adverse events. Here we describe a 60-year-old man with metastatic melanoma treated with three cycles of nivolumab and ipilimumab. He subsequently presented with new-onset brittle diabetes, rash, fever, and acute kidney injury. After initiation of insulin and aggressive fluid resuscitation, his kidney functions transiently improved but then dramatically worsened. Due concerns regarding hyperglycemia, a steroid-sparing agent was necessary and he was successfully treated with front-line mycophenolate mofetil, leading to normalization of renal function. The patient went on to develop a complete response and remains disease-free four years later. We conclude that mycophenolate can serve as an effective frontline therapy for immune-mediated acute kidney injury when steroids are contraindicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Harriet M Kluger
- Corresponding author: Harriet M Kluger, Section of Medical Oncology-WWW211, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Martinez-Morilla S, Zugazagoitia J, Wong PF, Kluger HM, Rimm DL. Quantitative analysis of CMTM6 expression in tumor microenvironment in metastatic melanoma and association with outcome on immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 2020; 10:1864909. [PMID: 33457084 PMCID: PMC7781756 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2020.1864909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemokine-like factor (CKLF)-like MARVEL transmembrane domain containing 6 (CMTM6) modulates degradation of a number of proteins, including programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) by protecting it from ubiquitin-mediated degradation. In this role, it could modulate the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Here, for the first time, we characterize CMTM6 expression in melanoma and evaluate its association with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We evaluated the expression of CMTM6, PD-L1 and other immune-related proteins in 60 pretreatment biopsies from metastatic melanoma patients who received immunotherapy, in a tissue microarray (TMA) using quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF). Expression of mRNA from control patients obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was also compared. CMTM6 expression was positively correlated with PD-L1, CD3, CD20, and CD68 markers, at protein (Pearson's r = 0.53-0.81, all P < .0001) and mRNA (Spearman's r = 0.15-0.44, all P < .002, except for CD68 where P = .26) levels. CMTM6 protein was associated with longer survival after immunotherapy when measured in the stromal (P = .007) and all the immune compartments tested (T cells, B cells, and macrophages). Multivariable analyses also revealed significant CMTM6 survival associations when measured in stromal (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.12, P = .001) and CD68-positive (HR = 0.30, P = .043) compartments. Additionally, PD-L1 but not CMTM6 showed prognostic value in control patients. Finally, high CMTM6 and PD-L1 co-expression in the stromal compartment was significantly associated with longer survival in treated patients (P = .028). Consequently, CMTM6 expression shows potential as a predictive factor for ICI treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jon Zugazagoitia
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Pok Fai Wong
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harriet M. Kluger
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - David L. Rimm
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|