Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis

The contribution of E3D imaging integrated with robotic navigation: analysis of the first 80 consecutive posterior spinal fusion cases

Eighty consecutive complex spinal robotic cases utilizing intraoperative 3D CT imaging (E3D, Group 2) were compared to 80 age-matched controls using the Excelsius robot alone with C-arm Fluoroscopic registration (Robot Only, Group 1). The demographics between the two groups were similar-severity of deformity, ASA Score for general anesthesia, patient age, gender, number of spinal levels instrumented, number of patients with prior spinal surgery, and amount of neurologic compression. The intraoperative CT scanning added several objective factors improving patient safety. There were significantly fewer complications in the E3D group with only 3 of 80 (4%) patients requiring a return to the operating room compared to 11 of 80 (14%) patients in the Robot Only Group requiring repeat surgery for implant related problems (Chi squared analysis = 5.00, p = 0.025). There was a significant reduction the amount of fluoroscopy time in the E3D Group (36 s, range 4-102 s) compared to Robot only group (51 s, range 15-160 s) (p = 0.0001). There was also shorter mean operative time in the E3D group (257 ± 59.5 min) compared to the robot only group (306 ± 73.8 min) due to much faster registration time (45 s). A longer registration time was required in the Robot only group to register each vertebral level with AP and Lateral fluoroscopy shots. The estimated blood loss was also significantly lower in Group 2 (mean 345 ± 225 ml) vs Group 1 (474 ± 397 ml) (p = 0.012). The mean hospital length of stay was also significantly shorter for Group 2 (3.77 ± 1.86 days) compared to Group 1 (5.16 ± 3.40) (p = 0.022). There was no significant difference in the number of interbody implants nor corrective osteotomies in both groups-Robot only 52 cases vs. 42 cases in E3D group.Level of evidence: IV, Retrospective review.

Implantation Corridors in Canine Thoracic Vertebrae: A Morphometric Study in Dogs of Varying Sizes

OBJECTIVE

 Surgical stabilization to treat fractures, luxations, and congenital malformations in the thoracic spine can be difficult due to its unique anatomy and surrounding structures. Our objective was to document the morphometrics of the thoracic vertebrae relating to an ideal trajectory for dorsolateral implant placement in a variety of dog sizes and to assess proximity to important adjacent critical anatomical structures using computed tomography (CT) studies.

STUDY DESIGN

 Medical records for 30 dogs with thoracic CT were evaluated. Implantation corridor parameters for thoracic vertebrae (T1-T13) were measured, including the length, width, angle from midline, and allowable deviation angle for corridors simulated using an ideal implant trajectory. The distances from each vertebra to the trachea, lungs, aorta, subclavian artery, and azygos vein were also measured.

RESULTS

 Implantation corridor widths were often very narrow, particularly in the mid-thoracic region, and allowable deviation angles were frequently small. Distances to critical anatomical structures were often less than 1 mm, even in larger dogs.

CONCLUSION

 Thoracic implantation requires substantial precision to avoid breaching the canal, ineffective implant placement, and potential life-threatening complications resulting from invasion of surrounding anatomical structures.

Navigated pedicle screw insertion with the Surgivisio system: Malposition rate and risk factors - about 648 screws

PURPOSE

Pedicle screw malposition rates vary greatly in scientific literature depending on the chosen criteria. Different techniques have been developed to lower the risk of screw malposition. Our primary objective is to evaluate the malposition rate associated with the use of the Surgivisio navigation system and to identify risk factors for screw malposition. The secondary objectives are to assess operating time and radiation data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a monocentric retrospective consecutive case series. All patients operated for pedicle screw implantation using the Surgivisio system between September 2017 and June 2020 were included. Screw positioning was evaluated on postoperative CT scans using Heary and Gertzbein classifications. Thirteen potential risk factors for screw malposition were hypothesized and tested with a univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Six hundred and forty-eight screws could be evaluated in 97 patients. Our study reported a 92.4% satisfactory screw implantation rate with a mean operative time per screw of 14.5±6.7minutes and a patient effective dose of 0.47±0.31 mSv per screw. One screw was neurotoxic and required an early revision (0.15%). Three risk factors for screw malposition have been identified in a multivariate analysis: female gender (OR=2.13 [1.11; 4], p=0.0219), an implantation level above D10 (OR=2.17 [1.13; 4.16], p=0.0197), and an "open" surgery (as opposed to percutaneous) (OR=3.47 [1.83; 6.56], p=0.0002).

CONCLUSION

Pedicle screw malposition rate and operative time with the Surgivisio navigation system are comparable with those reported in scientific literature. We theorized that intraoperative patient reference displacement could be a major cause of navigation failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Innovations in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review of Current Integrative Technologies

Neurosurgical technologies have become increasingly more adaptive, featuring real-time and patient-specific guidance in preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings. This review offers insight into how these integrative innovations compare with conventional approaches in spine surgery, focusing on machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence, augmented reality and virtual reality, and spinal navigation systems. Data on technology applications, diagnostic and procedural accuracy, intraoperative times, radiation exposures, postoperative outcomes, and costs were extracted and compared with conventional methods to assess their advantages and limitations. Preoperatively, augmented reality and virtual reality have applications in surgical training and planning that are more immersive, case specific, and risk-free and have been shown to enhance accuracy and reduce complications. ML algorithms have demonstrated high accuracy in predicting surgical candidacy (up to 92.1%) and tailoring personalized treatments based on patient-specific variables. Intraoperatively, advantages include more accurate pedicle screw insertion (96%-99% with ML), enhanced visualization, reduced radiation exposure (49 μSv with O-arm navigation vs. 556 μSv with fluoroscopy), increased efficiency, and potential for fewer intraoperative complications compared with conventional approaches. Postoperatively, certain ML and artificial intelligence models have outperformed conventional methods in predicting all postoperative complications of >6000 patients as well as predicting variables contributing to in-hospital and 90-day mortality. However, applying these technologies comes with limitations, such as longer operative times (up to 35.6% longer) with navigation, dependency on datasets, costs, accessibility, steep learning curve, and inherent software malfunctions. As these technologies advance, continuing to assess their efficacy and limitations will be crucial to their successful integration within spine surgery.

Accurate Placement and Revisions for Cervical Pedicle Screws Placed With or Without Navigation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of placement for cervical pedicle screws with and without the use of spinal navigation.

METHODS

A structured search was conducted in electronic databases without any language or date restrictions. Eligible studies reported the proportion of accurately placed cervical pedicle screws measured on intraoperative or postoperative 3D imaging, and reported whether intraoperative navigation was used during screw placement. Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were used to evaluate the methodological quality of how accuracy was assessed for cervical pedicle screws.

RESULTS

After screening and critical appraisal, 4697 cervical pedicle screws from 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion for cervical pedicle screws with a breach up to 2 mm was 94% for navigated screws and did not differ from the pooled proportion for non-navigated screws (96%). The pooled proportion for cervical pedicle screws placed completely in the pedicle was 76% for navigated screws and did not differ from the pooled proportion for non-navigated screws (82%). Intraoperative screw reposition rates and screw revision rates as a result of postoperative imaging also did not differ between navigated and non-navigated screw placement.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that the use of spinal navigation systems does not significantly improve the accuracy of placement of cervical pedicle screws compared to screws placed without navigation. Future studies evaluating intraoperative navigation for cervical pedicle screw placement should focus on the learning curve, postoperative complications, and the complexity of surgical cases.

Automatic image registration on intraoperative CBCT compared to Surface Matching registration on preoperative CT for spinal navigation: accuracy and workflow

INTRODUCTION

Spinal navigation solutions have been slower to develop compared to cranial ones. To facilitate greater adoption and use of spinal navigation, the relatively cumbersome registration processes need to be improved upon. This study aims to validate a new solution for automatic image registration and compare it to a traditional Surface Matching method.

METHOD

Adult patients undergoing spinal surgery requiring navigation were enrolled after providing consent. A registration matrix-Universal AIR (= Automatic Image Registration)-was placed in the surgical field and used for automatic registration based on intraoperative 3D imaging. A standard Surface Matching method was used for comparison. Accuracy measurements were obtained by comparing planned and acquired coordinates on the vertebrae.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients with 42 datasets were included. The mean accuracy of Universal AIR registration was 1.20 ± 0.42 mm, while the mean accuracy of Surface Matching registration was 1.94 ± 0.64 mm. Universal AIR registration was non-inferior to Surface Matching registration. Post hoc analysis showed a significantly greater accuracy for Universal AIR registration. In Surface Matching, but not automatic registration, user-related errors such as incorrect identification of the vertebral level were seen.

CONCLUSION

Automatic image registration for spinal navigation using Universal AIR and intraoperative 3D imaging provided improved accuracy compared to Surface Matching registration. In addition, it minimizes user errors and offers a standardized workflow, making it a reliable registration method for navigated spinal procedures.

Comparison of 3D-navigation and fluoroscopic guidance in percutaneous pedicle screw placement for traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction

Introduction

Fractures of the thoracolumbar junction are the most common vertebral fractures and can require surgical treatment. Several studies have shown that the accuracy of pedicle screw placement can be improved by the use of 3D-navigation. Still only few studies have focused on the use of navigation in traumatic spine injuries.

Research question

The aim of this study was to compare the screw placement accuracy and radiation exposure for 3D-navigated and fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement in traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction.

Materials and methods

In this single-center study 25 patients undergoing 3D-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw placement for traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (T12-L2) were compared to a control group of 25 patients using fluoroscopy. Screw accuracy was determined in postoperative CT-scans using the Gertzbein-Robbins classification system. Additionally, duration of surgery, dose area product, fluoroscopy time and intraoperative complications were compared between the groups.

Results

The accuracy of 3D-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw placement was 92.66 % while an accuracy of 88.08 % was achieved using standard fluoroscopy (p = 0.19). The fluoroscopy time was significantly less in the navigation group compared to the control group (p = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in radiation exposure, duration of surgery or intraoperative complications between the groups.

Discussion and conclusion

The results suggest that 3D-navigation facilitates higher accuracy in percutaneous pedicle screw placement of traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar junction, although limitations should be considered. In this study 3D-navigation did not increase fluoroscopy time, while radiation exposure and surgery time were comparable.

Evaluating a cutting-edge augmented reality-supported navigation system for spinal instrumentation

OBJECTIVE

Dorsal instrumentation using pedicle screws is a standard treatment for multiple spinal pathologies, such as trauma, infection, or degenerative indications. Intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) imaging and navigated pedicle screw placement are used at multiple centers. For the present study, we evaluated a new navigation system enabling augmented reality (AR)-supported pedicle screw placement while integrating navigation cameras into the reference array and drill guide. The present study aimed to evaluate its clinical application regarding safety, efficacy, and accuracy.

METHODS

A total of 20 patients were operated on between 06/2021 and 01/2022 using the new technique for intraoperative navigation. Intraoperative data with a focus on accuracy and patient safety, including patient outcome, were analyzed. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was evaluated by intraoperative CT imaging.

RESULTS

A median of 8 (4-18) pedicle screws were placed in each case. Percutaneous instrumentation was performed in 14 patients (70%). The duration of pedicle screw placement (duration scan-scan) was 56 ± 26 (30-107) min. Intraoperative screw revision was necessary for 3 of 180 pedicle screws (1.7%). Intraoperatively, no major complications occurred-one case of delay due to software issues and one case of difficult screw placement were reported.

CONCLUSION

The current study's results could confirm the use of the present AR-supported system for navigated pedicle screw placement for dorsal instrumentation in clinical routine. It provides a reliable and safe tool for 3D imaging-based pedicle screw placement, only requires a minimal intraoperative setup, and provides new opportunities by integrating AR.

The machine-vision image guided surgery system reduces fluoroscopy time, ionizing radiation and intraoperative blood loss in posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis

PURPOSE

To determine if the novel 3D Machine-Vision Image Guided Surgery (MvIGS) (FLASH™) system can reduce intraoperative radiation exposure, while improving surgical outcomes when compared to 2D fluoroscopic navigation.

METHODS

Clinical and radiographic records of 128 patients (≤ 18 years of age) who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF), utilising either MvIGS or 2D fluoroscopy, for severe idiopathic scoliosis were retrospectively reviewed. Operative time was analysed using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method to evaluate the learning curve for MvIGS.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2021, 64 patients underwent PSF using pedicle screws with 2D fluoroscopy and another 64 with the MvIGS. Age, gender, BMI, and scoliosis aetiology were comparable between the two groups. The CUSUM method estimated that the MvIGS learning curve with respect to operative time was 9 cases. This curve consisted of 2 phases: Phase 1 comprises the first 9 cases and Phase 2 the remaining 55 cases. Compared to 2D fluoroscopy, MvIGS reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy time, radiation exposure, estimated blood loss and length of stay by 53%, 62% 44%, and 21% respectively. Scoliosis curve correction was 4% higher in the MvIGS group, without any increase in operative time.

CONCLUSION

MvIGS for screw insertion in PSF contributed to a significant reduction in intraoperative radiation exposure and fluoroscopy time, as well as blood loss and length of stay. The real-time feedback and ability to visualize the pedicle in 3D with MvIGS enabled greater curve correction without increasing the operative time.

Spinal Navigation for Lateral Instrumentation of the Thoracolumbar Spine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Three-dimensional imaging-based navigation in spine surgery is mostly applied for pedicle screw placement. However, its potential reaches beyond. In this study, we analyzed the incorporation of spinal navigation for lateral instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine in clinical routine at a high-volume spine center.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for lateral instrumentation were prospectively enrolled. A reference array was attached to the pelvis, and a computed tomography scan was acquired intraoperatively. A control computed tomography scan was routinely performed after final cage placement, replacing conventional 2-dimensional X-ray imaging.

RESULTS

145 cases were enrolled from April to October 2021 with a median of 1 (1-4) level being instrumented. Indications for surgery were trauma (35.9%), spinal infection (31.7%), primary and secondary tumors of the spine (17.2%), and degenerative spine disease (15.2%). The duration of surgery after the first scan was 98 ± 41 (20-342) minutes. In total, 190 cages were implanted (94 expandable cages for vertebral body replacement (49.5%) and 96 cages for interbody fusion [50.5%]). Navigation was successfully performed in 139 cases (95.9%). The intraoperative mental load was rated on a scale from 0 to 150 (maximal effort) by the surgeons, showing a moderate effort (median 30 [10-120]).

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional imaging-based spinal navigation can easily be incorporated in clinical routine and serves as a reliable tool to achieve precise implant placement in lateral instrumentation of the spine. It helps to minimize radiation exposure to the surgical staff.

Radiation exposure for pedicle screw placement with three different navigation system and imaging combinations in a sawbone model

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that pedicle screw placement using navigation can potentially reduce radiation exposure of surgical personnel compared to conventional methods. Spinal navigation is based on an interaction of a navigation software and 3D imaging. The 3D image data can be acquired using different imaging modalities such as iCT and CBCT. These imaging modalities vary regarding acquisition technique and field of view. The current literature varies greatly in study design, in form of dose registration, as well as navigation systems and imaging modalities analyzed. Therefore, the aim of this study was a standardized comparison of three navigation and imaging system combinations in an experimental setting in an artificial spine model.

METHODS

In this experimental study dorsal instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine was performed using three imaging/navigation system combinations. The system combinations applied were the iCT/Curve, cCBCT/Pulse and oCBCT/StealthStation. Referencing scans were obtained with each imaging modality and served as basis for the respective navigation system. In each group 10 artificial spine models received bilateral dorsal instrumentation from T11-S1. 2 referencing and control scans were acquired with the CBCTs, since their field of view could only depict up to five vertebrae in one scan. The field of view of the iCT enabled the depiction of T11-S1 in one scan. After instrumentation the region of interest was scanned again for evaluation of the screw position, therefore only one referencing and one control scan were obtained. Two dose meters were installed in a spine bed ventral of L1 and S1. The dose measurements in each location and in total were analyzed for each system combination. Time demand regarding screw placement was also assessed for all system combinations.

RESULTS

The mean radiation dose in the iCT group measured 1,6 ± 1,1 mGy. In the cCBCT group the mean was 3,6 ± 0,3 mGy and in the oCBCT group 10,3 ± 5,7 mGy were measured. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant (p < 0.0001) difference between the three groups. The multiple comparisions by the Kruskall-Wallis test showed no significant difference for the comparison of iCT and cCBCT (p1 = 0,13). Significant differences were found for the direct comparison of iCT and oCBCT (p2 < 0,0001), as well as cCBCT and oCBCT (p3 = 0,02). Statistical analysis showed that significantly (iCT vs. oCBCT p = 0,0434; cCBCT vs. oCBCT p = 0,0083) less time was needed for oCBCT based navigated pedicle screw placement compared to the other system combinations (iCT vs. cCBCT p = 0,871).

CONCLUSION

Under standardized conditions oCBCT navigation demanded twice as much radiation as the cCBCT for the same number of scans, while the radiation exposure measured for the iCT and cCBCT for one scan was comparable. Yet, time effort was significantly less for oCBCT based navigation. However, for transferability into clinical practice additional studies should follow evaluating parameters regarding feasibility and clinical outcome under standardized conditions.

Comparison of major spine navigation platforms based on key performance metrics: a meta-analysis of 16,040 screws

PURPOSE

The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare available computer-assisted navigation platforms by key performance metrics including pedicle screw placement accuracy, operative time, neurological complications, and blood loss.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using major databases for articles comparing pedicle screw accuracy of computer-assisted navigation to conventional (freehand or fluoroscopy) controls via post-operative computed tomography. Outcome data were extracted and pooled by random-effects model for analysis.

RESULTS

All navigation platforms demonstrated significant reduction in risk of breach, with Stryker demonstrating the highest accuracy compared to controls (OR 0.16 95% CI 0.06 to 0.41, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) followed by Medtronic. There were no significant differences in accuracy or most surgical outcome measures between platforms; however, BrainLab demonstrated significantly faster operative time compared to Medtronic by 30 min (95% CI - 63.27 to - 2.47, P = 0.03, I2 = 74%). Together, there was significantly lower risk of major breach in the navigation group compared to controls (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.63, P < 0.0001, I2 = 56%).

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing between platforms, Stryker demonstrated the highest accuracy, and Brainlab the shortest operative time, both followed by Medtronic. No significant difference was found between platforms regarding neurologic complications or blood loss. Overall, our results demonstrated a 60% reduction in risk of major breach utilizing computer-assisted navigation, coinciding with previous studies, and supporting its validity. This study is the first to directly compare available navigation platforms offering insight for further investigation and aiding in the institutional procurement of platforms. LEVEL 3 EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis of Level 3 studies.

[Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement]

OBJECTIVE

Pedicle screw-based posterior instrumentation of the spine.

INDICATIONS

Instability of the spine due to trauma, infection, degenerative spinal disease or tumor.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

None.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Robot-assisted navigated pedicle screw placement.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Early functional mobilization starting on the first postoperative day.

RESULTS

A study by Lee et al. analyzed the clinical application of the system Mazor X Stealth Edition (Medtronic Navigation, Louisville, CO, USA; Medtronic Spine, Memphis, TN, USA) in 186 cases with a total of 1445 pedicle screws [1]. Correct screw positioning was achieved in 1432 pedicle screws (99.1%); six pedicle screws (0.4%) were revised intraoperatively. The mean duration of pedicle screw placement was 6.1 ± 2.3 min. Pojskić et al. published a case series regarding the application of the system Cirq (Brainlab, Munich, Germany) in 13 cases with a total number of 70 pedicle screws implanted [2]. Intraoperative imaging showed screw positioning according to the Gertzbein Robbins classification (GR) category A in 65 screws (92.9%) and GR B in one screw (1.4%). Screw positioning GR D with intraoperative revision was reported in two screws (2.9%). Mean duration of pedicle screw placement was 08:27 ± 06:54 min.

Two-dimensional C-arm robotic navigation system (i-Navi) in spine surgery: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Pedicle screws placement is very common procedure in spinal surgery. Robotic assisted surgery has been widely used in this operation. We assessed the accuracy of thoracolumbar spine trans-pedicle screws (TPS) implantation utilizing a noval robotic navigation system (i-Navi robotic navigation system) by planning with two-dimensional (2-D) C-arm.

METHODS

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cathay General Hospital on June 21, 2018 (IRB number: CGH-P 106,092), and written informed consents were obtained from all the patients. There are 18 patients were enrolled in the study. All the patients received the posterior fusion with TPS insertion under the assistant of our robotic navigation system.

RESULTS

There are 18 patients were included into our study, there are 2 patients were quitted from the study due to the equipment setup was not complete. Other 16 patients completed the entire procedure successfully. There is total 88 pedicle screws were inserted through i-Navi robotic navigation system. There are 79 of 88 screws were graded A, and 9 screws were graded B; no screws were graded C or D. No vascular or nerve injuries were noted after the operations.

CONCLUSION

We present our i-Navi robotic navigation system, by planning with 2-D C-arm imaging and pre-operative CT scans. According to the results of study, we think it can provide a reliable and easy tool to perform the TPS in thoracic lumbar spine surgery.

First Clinical Experience with a Novel 3D C-Arm-Based System for Navigated Percutaneous Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement

Background and Objectives: Navigated pedicle screw placement is becoming increasingly popular, as it has been shown to reduce the rate of screw misplacement. We present our intraoperative workflow and initial experience in terms of safety, efficiency, and clinical feasibility with a novel system for a 3D C-arm cone beam computed-tomography-based navigation of thoracolumbar pedicle screws. Materials and Methods: The first 20 consecutive cases of C-arm cone beam computed-tomography-based percutaneous pedicle screw placement using a novel navigation system were included in this study. Procedural data including screw placement time and patient radiation dose were prospectively collected. Final pedicle screw accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein–Robbins grading system. Results: In total, 156 screws were placed. The screw accuracy was 94.9%. All the pedicle breaches occurred on the lateral pedicle wall, and none caused clinical complications. On average, a time of 2:42 min was required to place a screw. The mean intraoperative patient radiation exposure was 7.46 mSv. Conclusions: In summary, the investigated combination of C-arm CBCT-based navigation proved to be easy to implement and highly reliable. It facilitates the accurate and efficient percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine. The careful use of intraoperative imaging maintains the intraoperative radiation exposure to the patient at a moderate level.

Comparison of three imaging and navigation systems regarding accuracy of pedicle screw placement in a sawbone model

3D-navigated pedicle screw placement is increasingly performed as the accuracy has been shown to be considerably higher compared to fluoroscopy-guidance. While different imaging and navigation devices can be used, there are few studies comparing these under similar conditions. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of two combinations most used in the literature for spinal navigation and a recently approved combination of imaging device and navigation system. With each combination of imaging system and navigation interface, 160 navigated screws were placed percutaneously in spine levels T11-S1 in ten artificial spine models. 470 screws were included in the final evaluation. Two blinded observers classified screw placement according to the Gertzbein Robbins grading system. Grades A and B were considered acceptable and Grades C-E unacceptable. Weighted kappa was used to calculate reliability between the observers. Mean accuracy was 94.9% (149/157) for iCT/Curve, 97.5% (154/158) for C-arm CBCT/Pulse and 89.0% for CBCT/StealthStation (138/155). The differences between the different combinations were not statistically significant except for the comparison of C-arm CBCT/Pulse and CBCT/StealthStation (p = 0.003). Relevant perforations of the medial pedicle wall were only seen in the CBCT group. Weighted interrater reliability was found to be 0.896 for iCT, 0.424 for C-arm CBCT and 0.709 for CBCT. Under quasi-identical conditions, higher screw accuracy was achieved with the combinations iCT/Curve and C-arm CBCT/Pulse compared with CBCT/StealthStation. However, the exact reasons for the difference in accuracy remain unclear. Weighted interrater reliability for Gertzbein Robbins grading was moderate for C-arm CBCT, substantial for CBCT and almost perfect for iCT.

Robotic-guided placement of cervical pedicle screws: feasibility and accuracy

INTRODUCTION

It has been shown that pedicle screw instrumentation in the cervical spine has superior biomechanical pullout strength and stability. However, due to the complex and variable anatomy of the cervical pedicles and the risk of catastrophic complications, cervical pedicle screw placement is not widely utilized.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective, consecutive patient review.

OBJECTIVE

To review and report our experience with robotic guided cervical pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed preoperative and postoperative CT scans of 12 consecutive patients who underwent cervical pedicle screw fixation with robotic guidance. Screw placement and deviation from the preoperative plan were assessed using the robotic system's planning software by fusing the preoperative CT (with the planned cervical pedicle screws) to the post-op CT. This process was carried out by manually aligning the anatomical landmarks on the two CTs. Once a satisfactory fusion was achieved, the software's measurement tool was used manually to compare the planned vs. actual screw placements in the axial, sagittal and coronal planes within the instrumented pedicle in a resolution of 0.1 mm. Medical charts were reviewed for technical issues and intra-operative complications.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight cervical pedicle screws were reviewed in 12 patients; mean age = 65 years, M:F = 2:1, and mean BMI = 27.99. No intra-operative complications related to the cervical pedicle screw placement were reported. Robotic guidance was successful in all 88 screws: eight in C2, 14 in C3, 16 in each of C4 and C5, 19 in C6, and 15 at C7. There were 14 pedicle screw breaches (15.9%); all were medial, less than 1 mm, and with no clinical consequences. In the axial plane, the screws deviated from the preoperative plan by 1.32 ± 1.17 mm and in the sagittal plane by 1.27 ± 1.00 mm. In the trajectory view, the overall deviation was 2.20 ± 1.17 mm. Although differences were observed in screw deviation from the pre-op plan between the right and left sides, they were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that robotic-guided cervical pedicle screw placement is feasible and safe. The medial breaches did not result in any clinical consequences.

Computed Tomography-Based Navigation System in Current Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

The number of spine surgeries using instrumentation has been increasing with recent advances in surgical techniques and spinal implants. Navigation systems have been attracting attention since the 1990s in order to perform spine surgeries safely and effectively, and they enable us to perform complex spine surgeries that have been difficult to perform in the past. Navigation systems are also contributing to the improvement of minimally invasive spine stabilization (MISt) surgery, which is becoming popular due to aging populations. Conventional navigation systems were based on reconstructions obtained by preoperative computed tomography (CT) images and did not always accurately reproduce the intraoperative patient positioning, which could lead to problems involving inaccurate positional information and time loss associated with registration. Since 2006, an intraoperative CT-based navigation system has been introduced as a solution to these problems, and it is now becoming the mainstay of navigated spine surgery. Here, we highlighted the use of intraoperative CT-based navigation systems in current spine surgery, as well as future issues and prospects.

Vertebrae segmentation in reduced radiation CT imaging for augmented reality applications

PURPOSE

There is growing evidence for the use of augmented reality (AR) navigation in spinal surgery to increase surgical accuracy and improve clinical outcomes. Recent research has employed AR techniques to create accurate auto-segmentations, the basis of patient registration, using reduced radiation dose intraoperative computed tomography images. In this study, we aimed to determine if spinal surgery AR applications can employ reduced radiation dose preoperative computed tomography (pCT) images.

METHODS

We methodically decreased the imaging dose, with the addition of Gaussian noise, that was introduced into pCT images to determine the image quality threshold that was required for auto-segmentation. The Gaussian distribution's standard deviation determined noise level, such that a scalar multiplier (L: [0.00, 0.45], with steps of 0.03) simulated lower doses as L increased. We then enhanced the images with denoising algorithms to evaluate the effect on the segmentation.

RESULTS

The pCT radiation dose was decreased to below the current lowest clinical threshold and the resulting images produced segmentations that were appropriate for input into AR applications. This held true at simulated dose L = 0.06 (estimated 144 mAs) but not at L = 0.09 (estimated 136 mAs). The application of denoising algorithms to the images resulted in increased artifacts and decreased bone density.

CONCLUSIONS

The pCT image quality that is required for AR auto-segmentation is lower than that which is currently employed in spinal surgery. We recommend a reduced radiation dose protocol of approximately 140 mAs. This has the potential to reduce the radiation experienced by patients in comparison to procedures without AR support. Future research is required to identify the specific, clinically relevant radiation dose thresholds required for surgical navigation.

Comparison of Effect of Navigation Versus No Navigation on Vertebral Body Screw Placement in Anterior Approach Surgery for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effects of using a navigation technique with anterior approach surgery for thoracolumbar burst fractures on vertebral body screw placement and discussed its effects on the long-term prognosis of patients.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of patients who had undergone anterior approach thoracolumbar surgery from May 2018 to August 2019. The 40 patients were randomly divided into the navigation group (NG) and control group (CG). In the NG, vertebral body screw placement was performed with 2-dimensional navigation guidance. For the CG, no navigation guidance was used. The clinical and radiological evaluations of the 2 groups were compared preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at the final follow-up. Paired t tests and the χ² test were used to evaluate the clinical and radiological indicators.

RESULTS

No differences were found in the hospital stay, operation time, autologous blood recovery, postoperative drainage volume, Cobb angle of the preoperative coronal plane and sagittal plane, postoperative sagittal plane, postoperative Cobb angle of the coronal and sagittal planes measured on radiographs and computed tomography scans between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The correction of the kyphosis deformity of the fracture segment was better in both groups (P < 0.001). The intraoperative blood loss and Cobb angle of the postoperative coronal plane in the NG was less than that in the CG (P < 0.05). Also, the 4 vertebral body screws in the NG were more parallel to the endplate than were those in the CG.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the use of navigation can improve the accuracy of screw placement in anterior approach surgery for thoracolumbar burst fractures and improve patients' long-term prognosis.

Does intraoperative 3D navigation improve SpineJack vertebral augmentation in thoracic and lumbar compression fracture?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of navigation on the positioning of the SpineJack implant in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar compression fractures.

METHODS

Between January 2018 and December 2019, all patients operated on for thoracic or lumbar fracture using the SpineJack device in stand-alone were included in this single-center study. The positioning of the SpineJack implant was analyzed on axial CT views by measuring the angle between the axis of the pedicle and the axis of the final implant. The relationships between implant positioning and the use of navigation or fluoroscopy, pedicle dimensions and levels of injury were analyzed. Surgical time, radiation exposure, radiological findings and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included, for 103 fractured vertebrae and a total of 205 implants, 148 placed under standard fluoroscopy and 57 with the Surgivisio navigation system. For pedicle diameters≥5mm (165 implants), the positioning of the implant relative to the axis of the pedicle was significantly better in the navigation group: 2°±1.4° (range, 0-7°) in the fluoroscopy group versus 1.2°±1.1° (range, 0-5°) in the navigation group (p=0.04). There were no significant differences in reduction of vertebral kyphosis angle or mean operating time. Dose area product (DAP) was significantly higher with navigation: 4.43Gy.cm² versus 0.47Gy.cm² (p<0.001) and dose to the surgeon significantly lower: 0.5 versus 1.6μSv (p<0.001). No difference was found regarding complications. Subgroup analysis showed significantly greater operative time and patient irradiation in the fluoroscopy group when pedicle diameter was less than 5mm.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the interest of navigation for positioning the SpineJack implant with respect to the pedicle axis in vertebrae with pedicle diameter≥5mm. This study also confirmed the reliability of navigation and lower radiation dose to the surgeon, regardless of the fracture level. Navigation reduced operating time and patient irradiation for vertebrae with pedicle diameter<5mm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Robotics and Spine Surgery: Lessons From the Personal Computer and Industrial Revolutions

Over the past decade, several review articles have evaluated the techniques and outcomes of robotics vs traditional methods in spine surgery. Recently, robot-assisted pedicle screw placement has emerged, representing an important milestone in the evolution of spine surgery. In the present article, the authors aim to provide the historical context regarding the use and growth of spinal robotics through the lens of the Industrial Revolution and the personal computer revolution. While the former provides insight into the current implications of robotics in spine surgery, the latter predicts future steps in this arena.

Cervical Spine Pedicle Screw Accuracy in Fluoroscopic, Navigated and Template Guided Systems-A Systematic Review

Background: Pedicle screws provide excellent fixation for a wide range of indications. However, their adoption in the cervical spine has been slower than in the thoracic and lumbar spine, which is largely due to the smaller pedicle sizes and the proximity to the neurovascular structures in the neck. In recent years, technology has been developed to improve the accuracy and thereby the safety of cervical pedicle screw placement over traditional fluoroscopic techniques, including intraoperative 3D navigation, computer-assisted Systems and 3D template moulds. We have performed a systematic review into the accuracy rates of the various systems. Methods: The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible papers; 9 valid papers involving 1427 screws were found. Results: fluoroscopic methods achieved an 80.6% accuracy and navigation methods produced 91.4% and 96.7% accuracy for templates. Conclusion: Navigation methods are significantly more accurate than fluoroscopy, they reduce radiation exposure to the surgical team, and improvements in technology are speeding up operating times. Significantly superior results for templates over fluoroscopy and navigation are complemented by reduced radiation exposure to patient and surgeon; however, the technology requires a more invasive approach, prolonged pre-operative planning and the development of an infrastructure to allow for their rapid production and delivery. We affirm the superiority of navigation over other methods for providing the most accurate and the safest cervical pedicle screw instrumentation, as it is more accurate than fluoroscopy and lacks the limitations of templates.

Less Invasive Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: The Case for Robotic-Assisted Placement of Pedicle Screws

Introduction: Pediatric spinal deformity involves a complex 3-dimensional (3D) deformity that increases the risk of pedicle screw placement due to the close proximity of neurovascular structures. To increase screw accuracy, improve patient safety, and minimize surgical complications, the placement of pedicle screws is evolving from freehand techniques to computer-assisted navigation and to the introduction of robotic-assisted placement. Purpose: The aim of this review was to review the current literature on the use of robotic navigation in pediatric spinal deformity surgery to provide both an error analysis of these techniques and to provide recommendations to ensure its safe application. Methods: A narrative review was conducted in April 2021 using the MEDLINE (PubMed) database. Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed retrospective or prospective studies, included pediatric patients, included a primary diagnosis of pediatric spine deformity, utilized robotic-assisted spinal surgery techniques, and reported thoracic or lumbar pedicle screw breach rates or pedicle screw malpositioning. Results: In the few studies published on the use of robotic techniques in pediatric spinal deformity surgery, several found associations between the technology and increased rates of screw placement accuracy, reduced rates of breach, and minimal complications. All were retrospective studies. Conclusions: Current literature is of a low level of evidence; nonetheless, the findings suggest the accuracy and safety of robotic-assisted spinal surgery in pediatric pedicle screw placement. The introduction of robotics may drive further advances in less invasive pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Further study is warranted.

Clinical efficiency of operating room-based sliding gantry CT as compared to mobile cone-beam CT-based navigated pedicle screw placement in 853 patients and 6733 screws

PURPOSE

Multiple solutions for navigation-guided pedicle screw placement are available. However, the efficiency with regard to clinical and resource implications has not yet been analyzed. The present study's aim was to analyze whether an operating room sliding gantry CT (ORCT)-based approach for spinal instrumentation is more efficient than a mobile cone-beam CT (CBCT)-based approach.

METHODS

This cohort study included a random sample of 853 patients who underwent spinal instrumentation using ORCT-based or CBCT-based pedicle screw placement due to tumor, degenerative, trauma, infection, or deformity disorders between November 2015 and January 2020.

RESULTS

More screws had to be revised intraoperatively in the CBCT group due to insufficient placement (ORCT: 98, 2.8% vs. CBCT: 128, 4.0%; p = 0.0081). The mean time of patients inside the OR (Interval 5 Entry-Exit) was significantly shorter for the ORCT group (ORCT: mean, [95% CI] 256.0, [247.8, 264.3] min, CBCT: 283.0, [274.4, 291.5] min; p < 0.0001) based on shorter times for Interval 2 Positioning-Incision (ORCT: 18.8, [18.1, 19.9] min, CBCT: 33.6, [32.2, 35.5] min; p < 0.0001) and Interval 4 Suture-Exit (ORCT: 24.3, [23.6, 26.1] min, CBCT: 29.3, [27.5, 30.7] min; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of imaging technology for navigated pedicle screw placement has significant impact on standard spine procedures even in a high-volume spine center with daily routine in such devices. Particularly with regard to the duration of surgeries, the shorter time needed for preparation and de-positioning in the ORCT group made the main difference, while the accuracy was even higher for the ORCT.

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw placement using augmented reality surgical navigation during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Augmented reality-based navigation is a new type of computer-assisted navigation where video cameras are used instead of infrared cameras to track the operated patients and surgical instruments. This technology has not so far been clinically evaluated for percutaneous pedicle screw placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study assessed percutaneous pedicle screw placement in 20 consecutive patients who underwent single-level minimally invasive TLIF using augmented reality surgical navigation. Facet joint violation and depression by the inserted pedicle screws were evaluated. Secondary outcome such as radiation dose exposure, fluoroscopy time, and operative time were collected for 3 phases of surgery: preparation phase, pedicle screw placement, and decompression with cage placement.

RESULTS

A clinical accuracy for screw placement within the pedicle (Gertzbein 0 or 1) of 94% was achieved. One screw violated the facet joint with a transarticular pathway. The screw head did not depress the facet in 54%. The use of fluoroscopy during navigation correlated with patient body-mass index (r=0.68, P<0.0001). The pedicle screw placement time corresponded to 36±5% of the total operative time of 117±11 minutes. A statistically significant decrease of 10 minutes in operative time was observed between the first and last 10 procedures which corresponded to the pedicle screw placement time decrease (48±9 vs. 38±7 min, P=0.0142). The learning curve model suggests an ultimate operative time decrease to 97 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Augmented reality surgical navigation can be clinically used to place percutaneous screws during minimally invasive TLIF. However, the lack of tracking of the location of the device requires intraoperative fluoroscopy to monitor screw insertion depth especially in obese patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Screw Malposition: Are There Long-term Repercussions to Malposition of Pedicle Screws?

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION

Pedicle screws have long been part of the continued advancements in spine surgery. Despite the many techniques that have been devised for their safe placement, malposition of screws continues to occur. Studies have evaluated the possible safe limits of screw malposition, and have given some insight on anatomic variation in spinal deformity. Review of the literature reveals several cases of deleterious long-term sequelae of malpositioned screws.

DISCUSSION

With the current experience, proposed recommendations are provided to detect and avoid the potential long-term sequelae. Though the literature has helped to define possible concerning screws, there are no good studies predicting long-term risk.

CONCLUSION

Improvements in technology and techniques, advancements in intraoperative confirmation and postoperative surveillance, studies that assist risk stratification, and expert consensus evaluations will help guide surgeons in their decision for addressing misplaced screws.

First in man in-situ augmented reality pedicle screw navigation

Background

Augmented reality (AR) is a rising technology gaining increasing utility in medicine. By superimposing the surgical site and the operator's visual field with computer-generated information, it has the potential to enhance the cognitive skills of surgeons. This is the report of the first in man case with "direct holographic navigation" as part of a randomized controlled trial.

Case description

A pointing instrument was equipped with a sterile fiducial marker, which was used to obtain a digital representation of the intraoperative bony anatomy of the lumbar spine. Subsequently, a previously validated registration method was applied to superimpose the surgery plan with the intraoperative anatomy. The registration result is shown in situ as a 3D AR hologram of the preoperative 3D vertebra model with the planned screw trajectory and entry point for validation and approval by the surgeon. After achieving alignment with the surgery plan, a borehole is drilled and the pedicle screw placed. Postoperativ computer tomography was used to measure accuracy of this novel method for surgical navigation.

Outcome

Correct screw positions entirely within bone were documented with a postoperative CT, with an accuracy similar to current standard of care methods for surgical navigation. The patient was mobilized uneventfully on the first postoperative day with little pain medication and dismissed on the fourth postoperative day.

Conclusion

This first in man report of direct AR navigation demonstrates feasibility in vivo. The continuation of this randomized controlled study will evaluate the value of this novel technology.

Patient-specific template-guided versus standard freehand lumbar pedicle screw implantation: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Patient-specific template-guided (TG) pedicle screw placement currently achieves the highest reported accuracy in cadaveric and early clinical studies, with reports of reduced use of radiation and less surgical time. However, a clinical randomized controlled trial (RCT) eliminating potential biases is lacking. This study compares TG and standard freehand (FH) pedicle screw insertion techniques in an RCT.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (mean age 64 years, 9 men and 15 women) scheduled consecutively and independently from this study for 1-, 2-, or 3-level lumbar fusion were randomized to either the FH (n = 12) or TG (n = 12) group. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement, intraoperative parameters, and short-term complications were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 112 screws (58 FH and 54 TG screws) were implanted in the lumbar spine. Radiation exposure was significantly less in the TG group (78.0 ± 46.3 cGycm2) compared with the FH group (234.1 ± 138.1 cGycm2, p = 0.001). There were 4 pedicle screw perforations (6.9%) in the FH group and 2 (3.7%) in the TG group (p > 0.99), with no clinical consequences. Clinically relevant complications were 1 postoperative pedicle fracture in the FH group (p > 0.99), 1 infection in the FH group, and 2 infections in the TG group (p > 0.99). There were no significant differences in surgical exposure time, screw insertion time, overall surgical time, or blood loss between the FH and TG groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this RCT, patient-specific TG pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar region achieved a high accuracy, but not better than a standardized FH technique. Even if intraoperative radiation exposure is less with the TG technique, the need for a preoperative CT scan counterbalances this advantage. However, more difficult trajectories might reveal potential benefits of the TG technique and need further research.

Radiation Exposure in Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of CT Image-Guided Navigation, Robotic Assistance, and Intraoperative Fluoroscopy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical review.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the use of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) image-guided navigation (IGN) and robotic assistance in posterior lumbar surgery and their relationship with patient radiation exposure and perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years old undergoing 1- to 2-level transforaminal lateral interbody fusion in 12-month period were included. Chart review was performed for pre- and intraoperative data on radiation dose and perioperative outcomes. All radiation doses are quantified in milliGrays (mGy). Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were utilized for categorical variables. One-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey test was used for continuous variables.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were assessed: 12 IGN, 62 robotic, 56 open, 35 fluoroscopically guided minimally invasive surgery (MIS). There was a lower proportion of women in open and MIS groups (P = .010). There were more younger patients in the MIS group (P < .001). MIS group had the lowest mean posterior levels fused (P = .015). Total-procedure radiation, total-procedure radiation/level fused, and intraoperative radiation was the lowest in the open group and highest in the MIS group compared with IGN and robotic groups (all P < .001). Higher proportion of robotic and lower proportion of MIS patients had preoperative CT (P < .001). Estimated blood loss (P = .002) and hospital length of stay (P = .039) were lowest in the MIS group. Highest operative time was observed for IGN patients (P < .001). No differences were observed in body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and postoperative complications (P = .313, .051, and .644, respectively).

CONCLUSION

IGN and robotic assistance in posterior lumbar fusion were associated with higher intraoperative and total-procedure radiation exposure than open cases without IGN/robotics, but significantly less than MIS without IGN/robotics, without differences in perioperative outcomes. Fluoro-MIS procedures reported highest radiation exposure to patient, and of equal concern is that the proportion of total radiation dose also applied to the surgeon and operating room staff in fluoro-MIS group is higher than in IGN/robotics and open groups.

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Thoracolumbar Fusions Using Intraoperative CT Guidance and Stereotactic Navigation in a Spinal Trauma Population: An Analysis of 58 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected single-institution database.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical and radiographic outcomes of posterior thoracolumbar fusions using intraoperative computed tomography (CT)-guidance and stereotactic navigation in thoracolumbar spinal trauma.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screw instrumentation is utilized for stabilization in thoracolumbar fusions. Suboptimal placement may lead to neurovascular complications, pseudarthrosis, postoperative pain, and the need for revision surgery. Image-guided spinal surgery is commonly used to improve accuracy, particularly for complex anatomy such as encountered with traumatic fractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 58 patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar fusions using intraoperative CT and stereotactic navigation for traumatic fractures from 2010 to 2017 at a single institution. Pedicle screw accuracy, realignment, clinical outcomes, and ease of use were retrospectively reviewed. Accuracy was assessed on postplacement or postoperative CT. Breach grades included: grade 1 (<2 mm), grade 2 (2-4 mm), and grade 3 (>4 mm).

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were identified having undergone 58 operations, which involved placement of 519 pedicle screws. Traumatic fracture patterns and levels of injury were varied. Accurate pedicle screw placement was found in 95.8% and was stable over time. Breach included: grade 1 in 19 screws, grade 2 in 2 screws, and grade 3 in 1 screw. No neurovascular complications were noted. No revision surgery was performed for misplacement. A subgroup of 6 ankylosing spondylitis patients were identified having undergone 6 operations with 63 pedicle screws. Accurate pedicle screw placement was found in 93.7%.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative CT-guidance and stereotactic navigation can overcome the difficulty associated with thoracolumbar trauma resulting in complex anatomy with malalignment and unpredictable trajectories. Intraoperative CT can be used with stereotactic guidance or for intraoperative verification of free-hand screw placement with repositioning as needed. CT-guidance maintains the benefit of reduced fluoroscopic exposure while improving accuracy of instrumentation and reducing reoperation for screw malposition.

The Nottingham radiation protocol for O-arm navigation in paediatric deformity patients: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

O-arm assisted pedicle screw placement has been proven to be more accurate than free-hand technique. Radiation exposure remains the primary drawback. We determined the feasibility and safety of a reduced radiation protocol in paediatric patients undergoing scoliosis correction.

METHODS

A reduced radiation protocol for a medtronic O-arm navigational system was devised. 3D CT reconstructions of an anthropomorphic pelvic phantom indicated adequate image quality after reduction to 14% of current manufacturer default factors. A feasibility study to test the image quality was undertaken on four patients, one with syndromic and three with idiopathic scoliosis each receiving progressively reducing radiation exposure of 60%, 50%, 40% and 14% of what would have been delivered using the manufacturer default protocol. This represented 32% of the mayo clinic protocol. It was achieved by reducing the x-ray tube current to 10 mA while keeping the tube potential at 90 kVp.

RESULTS

A low dose O-arm protocol was able to generate adequate image quality while delivering as little as 14% (for lumbar region reconstructions) of the recommended protocol radiation dose. The total radiation dose delivered with this protocol was approximately 0.8 milliSieverts for a single spin. This effective dose represents < 1/3 of average UK and < 1/6 average US annual radiation exposure. There were no neurological or implant-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our low dose O-arm radiation protocol significantly reduces the radiation exposure compared to the manufacturer recommended Mayo clinic protocol providing operational image quality to allow accurate screw placement in spinal deformity.

Application of Robot Positioning for Cannulated Screw Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture: Retrospective Study

Background

Femoral neck fracture is a common type of hip fracture. Conventional surgical treatment aims at fixing the fracture site with screws and then gradually promoting bone healing. A robot-assisted orthopedic surgery system is computer technology applied to surgical treatment.

Objective

This study aimed to explore the therapeutic effect and prognostic value of percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation using robot-assisted positioning in patients with femoral neck fractures.

Methods

From July 2018 to September 2019, 42 cases of femoral neck fracture admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Luohe Medical College were randomly and averagely divided into control and study groups. The patients in the control group were treated with conventional percutaneous cannulated screw internal fixation, while the patients in the study group were treated with robot-assisted percutaneous cannulated screw fixation during surgical treatment. We compared the treatment conditions and results of the operation between the 2 groups. The Harris score was used to evaluate the treatment efficacy. The state of fracture healing was followed up and compared between the 2 groups.

Results

The duration of the operation was shorter, there was less fluoroscopy use, and there were fewer drilled holes in the study group than in the control group (all, P<.001). There was no statistical difference in the amount of intraoperative bleeding between the 2 groups (P=.33). The Harris score (P=.045) and number of excellent and good ratings (P=.01) were significantly higher in the study group than in the control group. The difference in the fracture healing rate between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (P=.23). The fracture healing duration of the study group was shorter than that of the control group (P=.001).

Conclusions

The use of robotic positioning aids in the treatment of femoral neck fractures with percutaneous cannulated screw fixation can effectively improve the efficiency of surgery, shorten the duration of surgery, and reduce the radiation damage to patients. Meanwhile, it improves postoperative treatment and recovery rates of the patients and shortens the fracture healing time.

Frameless Patient Tracking With Adhesive Optical Skin Markers for Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation in Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new frameless reference marker system for patient tracking by analyzing the effect of vertebral position within the surgical field.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Most modern navigation systems for spine surgery rely on a dynamic reference frame attached to a vertebra for tracking the patient. This solution has the drawback of being bulky and obstructing the surgical field, while requiring that the dynamic reference frame is moved between vertebras to maintain accuracy.

METHODS

An augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) system with intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) capability was installed in a hybrid operating room. The ARSN system used input from four video cameras for tracking adhesive skin markers placed around the surgical field. The frameless reference marker system was evaluated first in four human cadavers, and then in 20 patients undergoing navigated spine surgery. In each CBCT, the impact of vertebral position in the surgical field on technical accuracy was analyzed. The technical accuracy of the inserted pedicle devices was determined by measuring the distance between the planned position and the placed pedicle device, at the bone entry point.

RESULTS

The overall mean technical accuracy was 1.65 ± 1.24 mm at the bone entry point (n = 366). There was no statistically significant difference in technical accuracy between levels within CBCTs (P ≥ 0.12 for all comparisons). Linear regressions showed that null- to negligible parts of the effect on technical accuracy could be explained by the number of absolute levels away from the index vertebrae (r ≤ 0.007 for all, β ≤ 0.071 for all).

CONCLUSION

The frameless reference marker system based on adhesive skin markers is unobtrusive and affords the ARSN system a high accuracy throughout the navigated surgical field, independent of vertebral position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Is it an asymptomatic tracheal injury or misdiagnosis in treatment of vertebral fracture: A case report

•

Pedicle screws are durable and safe tools that are frequently used in the treatment of vertebral fractures.

•

The most important complications of the use of pedicle screws are vascular injuries, internal organ injuries and spinal cord injuries.

•

Imaging methods, navigation systems, and cannulated pedicle screws should be used more frequently to reduce visceral organ injuries in the surgery of thoracic vertebral fractures.

Introduction

Pedicle screws are durable and safe instruments frequently used to treat vertebra injuries and deformities. There is also a possibility of medulla spinalis and visceral organ injury when the pedicle screws are delivered in unsuitable positions or dimensions. In this case, the authors want to draw attention to one of the visceral organ injuries during the thoracic pedicle screw placement.

Presentation of case

A 31 years old man underwent posterior instrumentation and fusion for T4 vertebra fractures. The patient was not symptomatic in the postoperative period. Tracheal pressure was observed at the 3rd thoracic vertebra level on the second day after the operation. No complications were encountered in the 3-year follow-up of the patient, who did not accept a second surgery recommended for screw replacement.

Discussion

During surgery for thoracic vertebral fractures, the shoulder joint makes it difficult to imagine as the shoulder bones enter the field of view. Therefore, the number of misplaced screws increases. Moreover, it increases the risk of internal organ injury.

Conclusion

The use of navigation systems or cannulated pedicle screws to treat thoracic vertebral fractures reduces internal organ injuries.

The Role of Intraoperative Image Guidance Systems (Three-Dimensional C-arm versus O-arm) in Spinal Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Study

OBJECTIVE

Spinal dorsal instrumentation is an established treatment option for a range of spinal disorders. In combination with navigation, intraoperative fluoroscopy reduces the risk of incorrectly placing screws. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and validity of fluoroscopy (intraoperative navigation with three-dimensional rotation of C-arm vs. O-arm).

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, 240 patients were included between July 2017 and April 2020. Intraoperative images were acquired using a Siemens-Arcadis Orbic 3D C-arm with a navigation system (Brainlab, AG, Munich, Germany) or using O-arm (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) with a navigation system (S7 StealthStation). Finally, we compared mismatches between intraoperative and postoperative computed tomography imaging results using Rampersaud-grade (A-D).

RESULTS

A total of 1614 screws were included: 94 patients in the C-arm group (cAG) and 146 in the O-arm group (oAG). In cAG, 3% (n = 20) of the screws had to be replaced directly due to inadequate positioning with median or lateral breaches, and 3.5 % of screws in oAG (n = 35). An A-score was achieved for 85.7% in the cAG and 87.4% in the oAG. A B-score was found in 11.5% in the cAG and 11.9% in the oAG. In the cAG, a C-score was achieved for 2.5% and in oAG for 0.7%. For 0.3% of the screws, a D-score was found in cAG and for none in oAG.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that placement of screws using intraoperative imaging in combination with a navigation tool is accurate. Furthermore, navigation coupled with the O-arm had significant advantages in accuracy over navigation with 3D C-arm fluoroscopy. However, both systems offer a high level of accuracy.

Initial intraoperative experience with robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement with stealth navigation in pediatric spine deformity: an evaluation of the first 40 cases

Pedicle screw fixation in pediatric spine surgery has become common practice given the fixation stability and improved curve correction. However, due to proximity to vital structures, accuracy is paramount. Literature has reported accuracy rates from 87.5 to 90% using traditional freehand techniques. This study presents our initial experience with pedicle screw placement using the newest generation of spinal robotics for treatment of pediatric spinal deformity. A cohort of patients, aged 8-21 years, undergoing spinal fusion surgery using robotic-assisted technology was reviewed. Diagnoses, Cobb angles, surgical time, robot time, number of screws placed, and complications were recorded. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed based on analysis of successful screw execution, evaluation screw position using intraoperative fluoroscopy and post-operative radiographs, and clinical evaluation. The average age was 14.5 years. Prevalent diagnoses included idiopathic (65%) and neuromuscular scoliosis (13%). Mean preoperative curve measured 66.8°. The median time for operation was 235 minutes with medians of 8 levels fused and 5 screws placed per patient. Of the 314 screws placed, we recorded a 98.7% accuracy rate. Lateral deviation was the most common cause of malpositioning. Post-operative plain films revealed no grossly misplaced screws. There were no perioperative neurologic deficits or malpositioned screws requiring reoperation. This is the first reported series of navigated spinal robotics used for pedicle screw placement in children. Our clinical success rate was 98.7% and there were no clinically relevant screw related complications. The study shows promising initial results of combined robotic-navigation techniques in pediatric patients.

3D-imaging in percutaneous spine surgery using the Surgivisio system

The Surgivisio system is a new generation of intraoperative 3D imaging, used in our institution for pedicle insertion in minimally invasive spine surgery since January 2018. The purpose of this technical note is to describe the Surgivisio system, its advantages and its limitations, in percutaneous spinal surgery. Results of the first year of use were analyzed, in a series of 29 patients, to evaluate accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, operative time and radiation exposure. On the Heary and Gertzbein classifications, 95.5% of pedicle screw placements (107/112) were rated as acceptable. Mean operative time was 29.3min per vertebra; mean radiation exposure per vertebra was 0.61 mSv. The Surgivisio system is an effective navigation tool for pedicle screw insertion in minimally invasive spinal surgery, with acceptable radiation exposure and operative time for each navigated vertebra. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, prospective cohort study.

Comparison of Navigated versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy and Complication Rate

OBJECTIVES

Accurate placement of the pedicle screw is requisite for any successful spinal instrumentation procedure. Screw insertion can be achieved using free-hand and fluoroscopic- or navigation-guided techniques. We sought to assess the variation in accuracy between fluoroscopic- and navigation-guided techniques, which are both used in Sheffield Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, a tertiary spine referral center.

METHODS

Using a retrospective study design, we assessed all the pedicle screws placed between 2013 and 2018. Radiographic and clinical assessment of all cases was performed.

RESULTS

We studied 176 spinal instrumented cases, with a total of 831 screws implanted, out of which 296 (35.6%) were navigated and 535 (64.4%) were fluoroscopic guided. Pathology treated included spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, tumors, and trauma. Suboptimal screw position was identified in 2.03% (n = 6) of the navigation-guided series and 4.11% (n = 22) of the fluoroscopic-guided series with an overall screw misplacement rate of 3.4%. Evaluating surgeons' individual accuracy rates revealed that suboptimal screw placement registered a higher variation for the fluoroscopy-guided technique, and the misplacement rate was higher for surgeons with a lower volume of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of navigation during spinal instrumentation helps lower the rate of screw misplacement for spinal surgeons who are at the beginning of their learning curve or do not frequently perform this kind of procedure. Navigation-guided spinal instrumentation is more accurate compared with fluoroscopic-guided techniques and appears to have a lower complication rate.

Prospective Evaluation of the Time Required for Insertion of 380 Lumbar and Sacral Pedicle Screws Using Navigation with an Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Imaging System

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the time required for various parts of the procedure to insert lumbar and sacral pedicle screws using navigation with an intraoperative, 3-dimensional imaging system. Comparison of these timings was carried out for different surgical indications.

Methods

This was a single-surgeon prospective cohort study of 69 consecutive patients (between August 2013 and June 2018) who underwent insertion of 380 pedicle screws into the lumbar and sacral vertebrae. Surgical indications, average time required for surgical exposure and attachment of the reference frame, average time required until completion of the first pedicle screw insertion, and average time required for insertion of a single pedicle screw were evaluated.

Results

The average time required from skin incision to reference frame attachment was 28.3 ± 20.4 (mean ± SD) minutes, and the average time required from reference frame attachment to completion of first pedicle screw insertion was 22.3 ± 9.6 minutes. The average time required for insertion of a single pedicle screw was 7.8 ± 2.7 minutes. When surgical indications were compared, the average time required for insertion of a single pedicle screw was 7.7 ± 2.6 minutes in surgery for spondylosis-related stenosis, 8.1 ± 2.8 minutes for degenerative scoliosis, and 8.2 ± 3.6 minutes for metastatic tumor (P = .89). There were no significant changes in these timings over consecutive 6-month periods.

Conclusions

There is no significant learning curve and no significant difference in navigation setup and pedicle screw insertion timings with intraoperative 3-dimensional navigation systems for surgeries of different pathologies and levels of surgery.

Level of Evidence

2.

Defining the MIS-TLIF: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Technologies Used by Surgeons Worldwide

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To date there is no consensus among surgeons as to what defines an MIS-TLIF (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using minimally invasive spine surgery) compared to an open or mini-open TLIF. This systematic review aimed to examine the MIS-TLIF techniques reported in the recent body of literature to help provide a definition of what constitutes the MIS-TLIF, based on the consensus of the majority of surgeons.

METHODS

We created a database of articles published about MIS-TLIF between 2010 and 2018. We evaluated the technical components of the MIS-TLIF including instruments and incisions used as well the order in which key steps are performed.

RESULTS

We could identify several patterns for MIS-TLIF performance that seemed agreed upon by the majority of MIS surgeons: use of paramedian incisions; use of a tubular retractor to perform a total facetectomy, decompression, and interbody cage implantation; and percutaneous insertion of the pedicle-screw rod constructs with intraoperative imaging.

CONCLUSION

Based on this review of the literature, the key features used by surgeons performing MIS TLIF include the use of nonexpandable or expandable tubular retractors, a paramedian or lateral incision, and the use of a microscope or endoscope for visualization. Approaches using expandable nontubular retractors, those that require extensive subperiosteal dissection from the midline laterally, or specular-based retractors with wide pedicle to pedicle exposure are far less likely to be promoted as an MIS-based approach. A definition is necessary to improve the communication among spine surgeons in research as well as patient education.

A minimally invasive, 3D-fluoroscopy-navigation-guided, 3D-controlled pedicle approach in spine surgery: first reliable results and impact on patient safety

PURPOSE

Safe pedicle screw placement is a daily challenge to every spine surgeon. Introduction of minimally invasive approaches in spinal surgery led to an impaired facility of inspection of the surgical field increasing the importance of intraoperative imaging and navigation. During the past years, we established a minimally invasive, navigated approach in our clinical setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of pedicle approaches in patients treated due to traumatic or osteoporotic fractures, spondylitis/discitis, and tumoral lesions. Guide wires for pedicle screws or kyphoplasty cannulas were inserted in a 3D-navigation-guided, minimally invasive technique. Positioning of the guide wires was verified via 3D-scan, and pedicle screws/kyphoplasty cannulas were then visualized via a.p./lateral radiographs. Accuracy data were compared to a standard navigated open approach control group with indications similar to the MIS-group.

RESULTS

23 MIS patients were included in this study (25-84 years, mean 70 years) with a total of 154 placed guide wires. Handling of the navigated Jamshidi needle was easy and secure. The guide wires showed correct placement in 151/154 cases. Three wires (1.9%) needed correction of placement after control scan. There were no vascular or neurologic complications due to wire misplacement. In the open-surgery control group, 7/181 screws (3.9%) needed intraoperative correction presenting no significant difference compared to the correction rate of the MIS-group (p = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows the feasibility and reliability of a navigation-guided, minimally invasive pedicle approach in the clinical setting. Therefore, reduced morbidity due to minimized approaches can be combined with higher accuracy of navigated pedicle screw/kyphoplasty cannula placement improving patient safety.

A Novel Augmented-Reality-Based Surgical Navigation System for Spine Surgery in a Hybrid Operating Room: Design, Workflow, and Clinical Applications

BACKGROUND

Treatment of several spine disorders requires placement of pedicle screws. Detailed 3-dimensional (3D) anatomic information facilitates this process and improves accuracy.

OBJECTIVE

To present a workflow for a novel augmented-reality-based surgical navigation (ARSN) system installed in a hybrid operating room for anatomy visualization and instrument guidance during pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

The workflow includes surgical exposure, imaging, automatic creation of a 3D model, and pedicle screw path planning for instrument guidance during surgery as well as the actual screw placement, spinal fixation, and wound closure and intraoperative verification of the treatment results. Special focus was given to process integration and minimization of overhead time. Efforts were made to manage staff radiation exposure avoiding the need for lead aprons. Time was kept throughout the procedure and subdivided to reflect key steps. The navigation workflow was validated in a trial with 20 cases requiring pedicle screw placement (13/20 scoliosis).

RESULTS

Navigated interventions were performed with a median total time of 379 min per procedure (range 232-548 min for 4-24 implanted pedicle screws).

The total procedure time was subdivided into surgical exposure (28%), cone beam computed tomography imaging and 3D segmentation (2%), software planning (6%), navigated surgery for screw placement (17%) and non-navigated instrumentation, wound closure, etc (47%).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative imaging and preparation for surgical navigation totaled 8% of the surgical time. Consequently, ARSN can routinely be used to perform highly accurate surgery potentially decreasing the risk for complications and revision surgery while minimizing radiation exposure to the staff.

Evaluation of surgeon and patient radiation exposure by imaging technology in patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion: systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Minimally invasive spine techniques are becoming increasingly popular owing to their ability to reduce operative morbidity and recovery times. The downside to these new procedures is their need for intraoperative radiation guidance.

PURPOSE

To establish which technologies provide the lowest radiation exposure to both patient and surgeon.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review OUTCOME MEASURES: Average intraoperative radiation exposure (in mSv per screw placed) to surgeon and patient. Average fluoroscopy time per screw placed.

METHODS

We reviewed the available English medical literature to identify all articles reporting patient and/or surgeon radiation exposure in patients undergoing image-guided thoracolumbar instrumentation. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed for studies providing radiation exposure or fluoroscopy use per screw placed to determine which navigation modality was associated with the lowest intraoperative radiation exposure. Values on meta-analysis were reported as mean ± standard deviation.

RESULTS

We identified 4956 unique articles, of which 85 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Forty-one articles were included in the meta-analysis. Patient radiation exposure per screw placed for each modality was: conventional fluoroscopy without navigation (0.26±0.38 mSv), conventional fluoroscopy with pre-operative CT-based navigation (0.027±0.010 mSv), intraoperative CT-based navigation (1.20±0.91 mSv), and robot-assisted instrumentation (0.04±0.30 mSv). Values for fluoroscopy used per screw were: conventional fluoroscopy without navigation (11.1±9.0 seconds), conventional fluoroscopy with navigation (7.20±3.93 s), 3D fluoroscopy (16.2±9.6 s), intraoperative CT-based navigation (19.96±17.09 s), and robot-assistance (20.07±17.22 s). Surgeon dose per screw: conventional fluoroscopy without navigation (6.0±7.9 × 10^-3 mSv), conventional fluoroscopy with navigation (1.8±2.5 × 10^-3 mSv), 3D Fluoroscopy (0.3±1.9 × 10^-3 mSv), intraoperative CT-based navigation (0±0 mSv), and robot-assisted instrumentation (2.0±4.0 × 10^-3 mSv).

CONCLUSION

All image guidance modalities are associated with surgeon radiation exposures well below current safety limits. Intraoperative CT-based (iCT) navigation produces the lowest radiation exposure to surgeon albeit at the cost of increased radiation exposure to the patient relative to conventional fluoroscopy-based methods.

Pedicle screw accuracy in clinical utilization of minimally invasive navigated robot-assisted spine surgery

In the emerging field of robot-assisted spine surgery, the radiographic evaluation of pedicle screw accuracy in clinical application is an area of high interest. This study describes the pedicle screw accuracy of the first 56 consecutive cases in which navigated robotic assistance was used in a private practice clinical setting. A retrospective, Institutional Review Board-exempt review of the first 56 navigated robot-assisted spine surgery cases was performed. Pedicle screw malposition, reposition, and return to operating room (OR) rates were collected. A CT-based Gertzbein and Robbins system (GRS) was used to classify pedicle screw accuracy. In the first 56 robotic cases, 356 total pedicle screws were placed. Eight screws were placed without the robot due to surgeon discretion. Of the 348 pedicle screws inserted by navigated robotic guidance, only 2.6% (9/348) were repositioned, resulting in a 97.4% (339/348) successful screw placement rate. The average age was 64, and 48% were female. Average body mass index was 31 kg/m². Based on the GRS CT-based grading, 97.7% (340/348) were graded A or B, 1.7% (6/348) screws were graded C, and only 0.6% (2/348) of screws were graded D. Two complications, explantation of interbody and vacuum-assisted wound closure, were reported as requiring a return to the OR, but these were not related to robotic guidance or pedicle screws. This study demonstrated a high level of accuracy (97.7%) in the first 56 cases using navigated, robot-assisted surgery based on the GRS. There were two non-screw-related complications requiring return to the operating room.

The evolution of surgical management for vertebral column tumors

In BriefThere has been a significant shift in treatment paradigms for both primary and metastatic spine tumors over the last several decades. This article highlights some of the more important treatment advances that practitioners should be made aware of. It is important to not only incorporate these changes into individual practice but also appreciate the treatment trends that herald a significantly different future for spine tumor treatment.

Comparison of the accuracy of cannulated pedicle screw versus conventional pedicle screw in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A randomized retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screws are commonly used to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Many studies have discussed the rates and effects of pedicle screw misplacement. In this study, to increase the accuracy rate, cannulated pedicle screws were inserted into the periapical vertebrae, highly rotated vertebrae, and vertebrae with very thin pedicles in a single patient group. We compared these results with those of a patient group who underwent conventional pedicle screw placement.

METHODS

Twenty-eight AIS patients treated surgically between 2015 and 2017 with cannulated pedicle screws or conventional pedicle screws were included. Group 1 (n = 15) received cannulated pedicle screws, whereas group 2 (n = 13) received conventional pedicle screws. Postoperative computed tomography scans were used to evaluate pedicle screw position. Pedicle perforation was assessed using the classification by Rao et al: grade 0, no perforation; grade 1, only the threads outside the pedicle (less than 2 mm); grade 2, core screw diameter outside the pedicle (2-4 mm); and grade 3, screw entirely outside the pedicle. Medial screw malposition was measured between the medial pedicle wall and the medial margin of the screw. Lateral screw malposition was measured between the lateral corpus wall and lateral screw margin.

RESULTS

Placement accuracy of 703 screws (group 1, 376; group 2, 327) was evaluated. A total of 142 (20.1%) pedicle screw perforations occurred: 63 (17.1%) in group 1 and 79 (25%) in group 2 (P < .05). There was no statistically significant intergroup difference in medial perforation (group 1, 34 [9%] vs group 2, 31 [10%]). Lateral perforation was significantly less common in group 1 (n = 29; 7.7%) than in group 2 (n = 4; 14.7%) (P = .0002).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of cannulated screws to treat AIS decreases perforation and complication rates. Although it did not significantly lower the medial perforation rate, it dramatically reduced the lateral perforation rate. The use of cannulated screws enables intraoperative confirmation of placement accuracy. Our data suggest that cannulated pedicle screw use to treat AIS is safer and more efficient.