Laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with fusion for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a long-term study of a national cohort

PURPOSE

To compare patient-reported 5-year clinical outcomes between laminectomy alone versus laminectomy with instrumented fusion in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy in a population-based cohort.

METHODS

All patients in the national Swedish Spine Register (Swespine) from January 2006 until March 2019, with degenerative cervical myelopathy, were assessed. Multiple imputation and propensity score matching based on clinicodemographic and radiographic parameters were used to compare patients treated with laminectomy alone with patients treated with laminectomy plus posterior-lateral instrumented fusion. The primary outcome measure was the European Myelopathy Score, a validated patient-reported outcome measure. The scale ranges from 5 to 18, with lower scores reflecting more severe myelopathy.

RESULTS

Among 967 eligible patients, 717 (74%) patients were included. Laminectomy alone was performed on 412 patients (mean age 68 years; 149 women [36%]), whereas instrumented fusion was added for 305 patients (mean age 68 years; 119 women [39%]). After imputation, the propensity for smoking, worse myelopathy scores, spondylolisthesis, and kyphosis was slightly higher in the fusion group. After imputation and propensity score matching, there were on average 212 pairs patients with a 5-year follow-up in each group. There were no important differences in patient-reported clinical outcomes between the methods after 5 years. Due to longer hospitalization times and implant-related costs, the mean cost increase per instrumented patient was approximately $4700 US.

CONCLUSIONS

Instrumented fusions generated higher costs and were not associated with superior long-term clinical outcomes. These findings are based on a national cohort and can thus be regarded as generalizable.

Surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy with athetoid cerebral palsy remains unestablished. Instrumented fusion is reported to have good clinical results; however, there are no data of decompression surgery for this pathology in recent years. This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of laminoplasty with or without posterior instrumented fusion for cervical myelopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy.

METHODS

A multi-centre surgical series of patients with cervical myelopathy and athetoid cerebral palsy were enrolled in this study. All patients showed symptoms and signs suggestive of cervical myelopathy and underwent laminoplasty with or without instrumented fusion. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Barthel index (BI), and changes in the C2-C7 sagittal Cobb angle in the lateral plain radiograph were analysed.

RESULTS

There were 25 patients (16 men and 9 women; mean age, 54.4 ± 10.8 years) with cervical myelopathy and athetoid cerebral palsy who underwent surgical treatment. The mean follow-up period was 41.9 ± 35.6 months. Overall, the BI significantly improved after surgery, whereas the JOA score and C2-C7 angle did not improve postoperatively. The recovery rate of the JOA score in the laminoplasty group was significantly higher than that of the fusion group (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical laminoplasty with or without instrumented fusion for treating cervical myelopathy due to athetoid cerebral palsy is effective in improving activities of daily living. Cervical laminoplasty may be an effective and less invasive surgical method for selective patients, especially for those with small involuntary movements and no remarkable cervical kyphosis nor instability.

Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: factors associated with the decision to fuse

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The indication to perform a fusion and decompression surgery as opposed to decompression alone for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) remains controversial. A variety of factors are considered when deciding on whether to fuse, including patient demographics, radiographic parameters, and symptom presentation. Likely surgeon preference has an important influence as well.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with the decision of a Canadian academic spine surgeon to perform a fusion for LDS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This study is a retrospective analysis of patients prospectively enrolled in a multicenter Canadian study that was designed to evaluate the assessment and surgical management of LDS.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Inclusion criteria were patients with: radiographic evidence of LDS and neurogenic claudication or radicular pain, undergoing posterior decompression alone or posterior decompression and fusion, performed in one of seven, participating academic centers from 2015 to 2019.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient demographics, patient-rated outcome measures (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], numberical rating scale back pain and leg pain, SF-12), and imaging parameters were recorded in the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) database. Surgeon factors were retrieved by survey of each participating surgeon and then linked to their specific patients within the database.

METHODS

Univariate analysis was used to compare patient characteristics, imaging measures, and surgeon variables between those that had a fusion and those that had decompression alone. Multivariate backward logistic regression was used to identify the best combination of factors associated with the decision to perform a fusion.

RESULTS

This study includes 241 consecutively enrolled patients receiving surgery from 11 surgeons at 7 sites. Patients that had a fusion were younger (65.3±8.3 vs. 68.6±9.7 years, p=.012), had worse ODI scores (45.9±14.7 vs. 40.2±13.5, p=.007), a smaller average disc height (6.1±2.7 vs. 8.0±7.3 mm, p=.005), were more likely to have grade II spondylolisthesis (31% vs. 14%, p=.008), facet distraction (34% vs. 60%, p=.034), and a nonlordotic disc angle (26% vs. 17%, p=.038). The rate of fusion varied by individual surgeon and practice location (p<.001, respectively). Surgeons that were fellowship trained in Canada more frequently fused than those who fellowship trained outside of Canada (76% vs. 57%, p=.027). Surgeons on salary fused more frequently than surgeons remunerated by fee-for-service (80% vs. 64%, p=.004). In the multivariate analysis the clinical factors associated with an increased odds of fusion were decreasing age, decreasing disc height, and increasing ODI score; the radiographic factors were grade II spondylolisthesis and neutral or kyphotic standing disc type; and the surgeon factors were fellowship location, renumeration type and practice region. The odds of having a fusion surgery was more than two times greater for patients with a grade II spondylolisthesis or neutral and/or kyphotic standing disc type (opposed to lordotic standing disc type). Patients whose surgeon completed their fellowship in Canada, or whose surgeon was salaried (opposed to fee-for-service), or whose surgeon practiced in western Canada had twice the odds of having fusion surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to perform a fusion in addition to decompression for LDS is multifactorial. Although patient and radiographic parameters are important in the decision-making process, multiple surgeon factors are associated with the preference of a Canadian spine surgeon to perform a fusion for LDS. Future work is necessary to decrease treatment variability between surgeons and help facilitate the implementation of evidence-based decision making.

Aneurysmal bone cyst and osteoblastoma: an extremely rare combination in the pediatric spine

STUDY DESIGN

Case report.

OBJECTIVE

To report the clinical and imaging findings of a patient with the extremely rare association of aneurysmal bone cyst and osteoblastoma in the cervical spine. To our knowledge, only three cases have been reported in the published literature in children under 16 years of age with this condition in the cervical spine.

METHODS

The patient's history, physical examination, imaging findings, and management with a complete 4-year medical history, surgical intervention and radiological follow-up are reported.

RESULTS

A 4-year 11-month-old boy was diagnosed with aneurysmal bone cyst in association of osteoblastoma and was treated with CT-guided intralesional injection calcitonin and methylprednisolone. During the course of intralesional therapy, a pathological fracture of C2 was produced. Subsequently, a widened intralesional excision and instrumented fusion from occiput to cervical spine (C0-C4) was performed.

CONCLUSION

The association of aneurysmal bone cyst and osteoblastoma in spine is extremely rare. Although both are benign lesions, in the cervical location, complete removal of the tumors is challenging. Wide resection with reconstruction of the segments for stability associated with adjuvant treatment with calcitonin and corticosteroids provides a good option.

Lumbar disc herniation surgery: Is it worth adding interspinous spacer or instrumented fusion with regard to disc excision alone?

BACKGROUND

Discectomy is sometimes associated with recurrence of disc herniation and pain after surgery. The evidence to use an interspinous dynamic stabilization system or instrumented fusion in association with disc excision to prevent pain and re-operation remains controversial. In this study, we analyzed if adding interspinous spacer or fusion, offers advantages in relation to microdiscetomy alone.

METHODS

Patients with lumbar disc herniation were divided in 3 groups; microdiscectomy alone (MD), microdiscectomy plus interspinous spacer (IS) and open discectomy plus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). The clinical efficacy was measured using the Owestry Disability Index (ODI). Other outcome parameters including visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) back and legs, length of stay, direct in-hospital cost, 90-day complication rate, and 1-year re-operation rate were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients whose mean age was 39.1 (±8.5) years were included. A significant improvement of the ODI and VAS back and legs pain baseline score was detected in the 3 groups. After 1 year, no significant differences in ODI, VAS back and legs pain were found between the 3 groups. There was an increase of 169% of the total direct in- hospital cost in IS group and 287% in PLIF group, in relation to MD (p < 0.001). Length of stay was 86% higher in the IS group and 384% longer in the PLIF group compared to MD (p < 0.001). The 1 year re-operation rates were 5.6%, 10% and 16.2% (p = 0.33). Discectomy seems to be the main responsible for the clinical improvement, without the interspinous spacer or fusion adding any benefit. The addition of interspinous spacer or fusion increased direct in-hospital cost, length of stay, and did not protect against re-operation.

Minimal Invasive Surgery Instrumented Fusion versus Conventional Open Surgical Instrumented Fusion for the Treatment of Spinal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to compare the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) instrumented fusion ± decompression versus conventional open surgery (COS) instrumented fusion ± decompression for the treatment of spinal metastases.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search through PubMed, Scopus, Europe PMC (PubMed Central), and Cochrane Central Database using the keywords "minimal invasive surgery" OR "minimally invasive surgery" OR "mini-open" AND "conventional open surgery" OR "traditional open surgery" OR "open surgery" AND "spinal metastasis". The outcomes of interest were complications, neurologic improvement, length of stay, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, and operative duration.

RESULTS

There were a total of 8 studies comprising 486 patients. Complications were less frequent in MIS compared with COS (odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.84; P = 0.01; I² = 0%). Major complications related to surgery were less in the MIS group (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.84; P = 0.01; I² = 0%). The rate of neurologic improvement was similar in both groups (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.64-1.59; P = 0.95; I² = 0%). MIS was associated with less blood loss (mean difference, -690.00 mL; 95% CI, -888.31 to -491.69; P < 0.001; I² = 56%), and lower transfusion rate compared with COS (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.11-0.66; P = 0.004; I² = 50%). Length of surgery was similar in both groups (mean difference, -12.49 minutes; 95% CI, -45.93 to 20.95; P = 0.46; I² = 86%). MIS resulted in shorter length of stay compared with COS (mean difference -3.58 days; 95% CI, -6.90 to -0.26; P = 0.03; I² = 89%).

CONCLUSIONS

MIS was associated with lower complications, blood loss, transfusion rate, and shorter length of stay with a similar rate of neurologic improvement and length of surgery compared with COS.

Evaluation of surgeon and patient radiation exposure by imaging technology in patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion: systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Minimally invasive spine techniques are becoming increasingly popular owing to their ability to reduce operative morbidity and recovery times. The downside to these new procedures is their need for intraoperative radiation guidance.

PURPOSE

To establish which technologies provide the lowest radiation exposure to both patient and surgeon.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic review OUTCOME MEASURES: Average intraoperative radiation exposure (in mSv per screw placed) to surgeon and patient. Average fluoroscopy time per screw placed.

METHODS

We reviewed the available English medical literature to identify all articles reporting patient and/or surgeon radiation exposure in patients undergoing image-guided thoracolumbar instrumentation. Quantitative meta-analysis was performed for studies providing radiation exposure or fluoroscopy use per screw placed to determine which navigation modality was associated with the lowest intraoperative radiation exposure. Values on meta-analysis were reported as mean ± standard deviation.

RESULTS

We identified 4956 unique articles, of which 85 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Forty-one articles were included in the meta-analysis. Patient radiation exposure per screw placed for each modality was: conventional fluoroscopy without navigation (0.26±0.38 mSv), conventional fluoroscopy with pre-operative CT-based navigation (0.027±0.010 mSv), intraoperative CT-based navigation (1.20±0.91 mSv), and robot-assisted instrumentation (0.04±0.30 mSv). Values for fluoroscopy used per screw were: conventional fluoroscopy without navigation (11.1±9.0 seconds), conventional fluoroscopy with navigation (7.20±3.93 s), 3D fluoroscopy (16.2±9.6 s), intraoperative CT-based navigation (19.96±17.09 s), and robot-assistance (20.07±17.22 s). Surgeon dose per screw: conventional fluoroscopy without navigation (6.0±7.9 × 10^-3 mSv), conventional fluoroscopy with navigation (1.8±2.5 × 10^-3 mSv), 3D Fluoroscopy (0.3±1.9 × 10^-3 mSv), intraoperative CT-based navigation (0±0 mSv), and robot-assisted instrumentation (2.0±4.0 × 10^-3 mSv).

CONCLUSION

All image guidance modalities are associated with surgeon radiation exposures well below current safety limits. Intraoperative CT-based (iCT) navigation produces the lowest radiation exposure to surgeon albeit at the cost of increased radiation exposure to the patient relative to conventional fluoroscopy-based methods.

Bilateral synovial cyst of the thoracic spine causing paraparesis

Spinal synovial cysts are degenerative extradural lesions mostly found in the lumbar region, and more rarely at cervical or thoracic levels and in a bilateral presentation. We report a patient with a history of progressive paraparesis associated with bilateral cervicothoracic synovial cysts, causing spinal canal narrowing and cord compression, ultimately resulting in myelopathy. A review of the literature summarizes previous reports on this topic. Surgical excision of the extradural mass, decompression of the spinal canal and instrumented fusion were performed, improving lower limb deficit and gait. Post-surgical MRI showed evidence of complete cyst resection, and good arthrodesis consolidation with adequate sagittal balance. Surgical excision is indicated in case of medical treatment failure or increasing symptom severity. Given the strong pathophysiological link between synovial cysts and spinal instability, concomitant instrumented fusion may help improve outcome.

Cervical Spine Osteomyelitis: A Systematic Review of Instrumented Fusion in the Modern Era

OBJECTIVE

For cases of cervical osteomyelitis that require surgery, concern has continued regarding instrumentation owing to the potential for bacterial seeding of the hardware. We performed a systematic review of the current data.

METHODS

A search was performed using Medline, Embase, and Ovid for articles using the keywords "cervical osteomyelitis/spondylodiscitis" and "fusion" or "instrumentation" reported from 1980 to 2017. Prospective or retrospective studies describing ≥2 patients with cervical osteomyelitis were included in the analysis; non-English reports were excluded. Individual patients were excluded from the final analysis if they had previously undergone spinal instrumentation.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients from 24 studies met our criteria. Surgical approaches were classified as anterior-only, combined anteroposterior, and posterior-only for 64.8%, 31.9%, and 3.3% of the patients respectively. Of the patients treated using an anterior-only approach, 76.5% had received anterior plating and 85.3%, a cage or spacer implants. Of the patients who had undergone combined approaches, 85.1% underwent circumferential fixation and 14.9%, anterior debridement with posterior instrumentation. The follow-up period ranged from 6 weeks to 11 years (mean, 31.0 months). All the studies reporting the fusion rates, except for 1, reported a 100% fusion rate. The reported rates of pain improvement and neurologic recovery were favorable. The incidence of hardware failure and wound complications was 4.6% and 4.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite placing instrumentation during active infection, the rates of hardware failure and wound complications were comparable to those of elective cervical spine procedures. These results suggest that surgical intervention with instrumentation is a safe treatment option for patients with cervical spine osteomyelitis.

Complications associated with intrathecal morphine in spine surgery: a retrospective study

Background

Supplemental intrathecal morphine (ITM) represents an option to manage postoperative pain after spine surgery due to ease of administration and ability to confer effective short-term analgesia at low dosages. However, whether ITM increases risk of surgical site infections (SSI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and incidental dural tears (IDT) has not been investigated. Therefore, this study was performed to determine the rates of SSI, CSF leak, and IDT in patients that received ITM.

Methods

Patients that underwent posterior instrumented fusion from January 2010 to 2016 that received ITM were compared to controls with respect to demographic, medical, surgical, and outcome data. Fisher's exact test was used to compare rates of SSI, CSF leak, and IDT between groups. Poisson regression was used to analyze complication rates after adjusting for the influence of covariates and potential confounders.

Results

A total of 512 records were analyzed. ITM was administered to 78 patients prior to wound closure. The remaining 434 patients compromised the control group. IDT was significantly more common among patients receiving ITM (P=0.009). Differences in rates of CSF leak and SSI were not statistically significant (P=0.373 and P=0.564, respectively). After compensating for additional variables, Poisson regression revealed a significant increase in rates of IDT (P=0.007) according to ITM injection and advanced age (P=0.014). There was no significant difference in rates of CSF leak or SSI after accounting for the additional variables (P>0.05).

Conclusions

ITM for pain control in posterior instrumented spinal fusion surgery was linked to increased likelihood of IDT but not CSF leaks or SSI. Age was also noted to be a significant predictor of IDT. Spine surgeons should weigh potential risks against benefits when deciding whether to administer ITM for postoperative pain management following spine surgery.

Surgical outcomes in the elderly with degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative study between patients over 80 years of age and under 80 years-a gender-, diagnosis-, and surgical method-matched two-cohort analyses

BACKGROUND

In Taiwan, the current life expectancy of an 80-year-old man is 88.4 years and that of an 80-year-old is woman is 89.8 years. Surgical candidates older than 80 years usually ask surgeons whether it would be safe for them to undergo surgery.

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study were to report the surgical outcomes of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis who were older than 80 years and underwent instrumented surgeries and to compare these data with the outcomes of patients aged 65-79 years.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The study included 76 patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The preoperative medical condition was reviewed using the weighted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and back pain. Plain radiographs were used to assess the fusion status, implant-related complications, and the prevalence of osteoporotic compression fractures (OVFx).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study comprised patients older than 80 years, and the control group comprised patients aged 65-79 years. The two cohorts were matched for gender, main diagnosis, and surgical method.

RESULTS

In total, 76 patients were included in the study. The study group had 38 patients with a mean age of 82.4 years (80-93 years); the control group also had 38 patients with a mean age of 70.8 years (65-79 years). The study group had a significantly higher ASA classification (2.94 vs. 2.76, p=.040) and CCI score (1.84 vs. 1.13, p=.012). The study group had a higher prevalence of preoperative OVFx (10.5% vs. 2.6%, p=.116) and incidence of new-onset OVFx (13.2% vs. 2.6%, p=.089). The study group had longer operative times (204.6 vs. 179.1 minutes, p=.052) with more blood loss (606.5 vs. 525.8 mL, p=.512), but this finding was not statistically significant. The mean ODI and VAS scores were similar between the two groups. The bone union rate was superior in the control group (81.6% vs. 89.5%, p=.328).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients older than 80 years have a higher osteoporotic status and comorbidities, which may lead to longer operative times and greater blood loss, with poorer radiographic outcomes. However, the clinical results were not affected. With appropriate patient selection, the age of >80 years is not a negative predictive factor for instrumented surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Surgical outcomes after instrumented lumbar surgery in patients of eighty years of age and older

BACKGROUND

In Taiwan, the life expectancy of an 80-year-old man is 88.4 years and the life expectancy of an 80-year-old woman is 89.8 years. Some of these people will develop symptomatic degenerative lumbar diseases that interfere with an active lifestyle. These older surgical candidates usually ask the surgeon whether it would be safe to undergo surgery. However, there is no literature assessing the outcomes of laminectomy, fusion and posterior fixation for degenerative lumbar diseases in patients older than 80 years. The purpose of this study was to report the surgical outcomes of patients 80 years of age and older who underwent spinal decompression and instrumented lumbar arthrodesis for degeneration lumbar diseases.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with degenerative lumbar diseases and spinal stenosis who underwent surgery between January 2010 and December 2012. Inclusion criteria were age greater than or equal to 80 years, decompression with instrumented lumbar arthrodesis, and at least 2 years of follow-up. Totally 89 patients were studies. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) of leg and back pain. Plain radiographs (lateral, anteroposterior, and flexion-extension) were used to assess the status of fusion and implant-related complications. Every complication during admission and any implant-related or failed-back syndrome requiring a second surgery was documented. T test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Five patients were lost to follow-up, and another 12 died during the follow-up period. One patient died due to cerebral stroke just 2 days after surgery, and the other 11 patients passed away 3 months to 4 years postoperatively. In all, 72 patients had an adequate follow-up: 44 were female and 28 were male. The average age at surgery was 82.5 ± 2.6 years (80 to 93); 63 patients underwent their first lumbar surgery, and nine patients received a second surgery. Patients underwent arthrodesis surgeries were from a single-level to a 7-level. Four patients developed complications (5.6 %, 4/72). At the final follow-up, the average ODI score was lower than the preoperative score (30.0 vs. 61.8) (p < 0.001). The average VAS score also showed improvement (leg: p < 0.001; back: p < 0.001). Forty-three patients were classified as "satisfied", and 29 were "dissatisfied". Longer operation time (p = 0.014) and development of complications (p = 0.049) were related to poor clinical results. Radiographic follow-up showed that 53 patients had solid union, ten had a probable union, and nine had pseudarthrosis. More surgical segments led to a greater chance of pseudarthrosis (2.0 ± 0.9 vs 3.0 ± 1.8, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Longer instrumented segments and development of complications contributed to worse clinical and radiographic outcomes. With proper patient selection, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion can be safe and effective for patients 80 years of age and older with degenerative lumbar conditions.

Management of pediatric single-level vertebral hemangiomas presenting with myelopathy by three-pronged approach (ethanol embolization, laminectomy, and instrumentation): a single-institute experience

PURPOSE

Pediatric vertebral hemangiomas (VH) are exceedingly rare benign and highly vascular tumours of the spine. There are no guidelines available for management of these patients in literature. Purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of intraoperative ethanol embolization, surgical decompression, and instrumented fusion in pediatric symptomatic VH with single-level involvement.

METHODS

Surgery consisted of intraoperative bilateral pedicular absolute alcohol injection and laminectomy at the level of pathology followed by a short-/long-segment instrumented fusion using pedicle screws and rod. Seven patients (mean age 14 ± 2.4 years, range 10-17 years, five females and two males) (age < 18 years) who were treated using this technique at our institute since March 2008 to December 2013 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Demographical, clinical, radiological, operative details, and postoperative events were retrieved from hospital records. During follow-up visits, clinical status and imaging were recorded. Outcome assessed with clinical and neurological outcome score of American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale.

RESULTS

Duration of symptoms ranged from 3 to 60 months (mean, 14.7 ± 20.4 months). Clinical features include myelopathy with motor and sensory involvement in all (five were paraplegic), back pain in two patients, and bladder involvement in two patients. The preoperative American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) were B in five patients and C and D in one patient each. All had pan vertebral body VH with severe cord compression in the thoracic region on imaging study. Mean duration of surgery was 248.6 ± 60 minutes (range 195-310 min) and blood loss was 535 ml (range 200-1500 ml). Immediate embolization was achieved in all patients, which allowed laminectomy and soft tissue hemangioma removal relatively easy. Post surgery, at mean follow-up of 45.3 (±23.2) months (range 1-78 months), all patients showed improvement in power (sphincter improvement in two patients). ASIA were E in six patients and D in one patient at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The present study is the largest series of pediatric symptomatic VH. This procedure is a safe, efficient method to treat symptomatic pediatric VH with severe cord compression. It seems to serve the purpose of providing embolization, cord decompression, rigid fusion at the same sitting without adding new morbidity, and preventing excessive blood loss.

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma metastasis to the thoracic spine

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) is a very rare salivary gland malignancy accounting for less than 1% of salivary gland tumors, and classically arises from the parotid gland in females. Spinal cord compression caused by EMC metastasized from the parotid gland has only been described once in the literature to our knowledge. We report the first case of a patient with parotid EMC spinal metastasis undergoing a gross total resection with instrumented fusion. This case illustrates that an en bloc resection with a planned transgression through the spinal canal may be a reasonable option for EMC metastasized to the spine.

Comparison of perioperative complications following staged versus one-day anterior and posterior cervical decompression and fusion crossing the cervico-thoracic junction

INTRODUCTION

Multilevel cervical pathology may be treated via combined anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) followed by posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF) crossing the cervico-thoracic junction. The purpose of the study was to compare perioperative complication rates following staged versus same day ACDF combined with PSIF crossing the cervico-thoracic junction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing ACDF followed by PSIF crossing the cervico-thoracic junction at a single institution was performed. Patients underwent either same day (group A) or staged with one week interval surgeries (group B). The minimum follow-up was 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (14 females and 21 males) were analyzed. The average age was 60 years (37-82 years). There were 12 patients in group A and 23 in group B. Twenty-eight complications noted in 14 patients (40%) included: dysphagia in 13 (37%), dysphonia in 6 (17%), post-operative reintubation in 4 (11%), vocal cords paralysis, delirium, superficial incisional infection and cerebrospinal fluid leakage each in one case. Significant differences comparing group A vs. B were found in: the number of levels fused posteriorly (5 vs. 7; p=0.002), total amount of intravenous fluids (3233ml vs. 4683ml; p=0.03), length of hospital stay (10 vs. 18 days; p=0.03) and transfusion of blood products (0 vs. 9 patients). Smoking and cervical myelopathy were the most important risk factors for perioperative complications regardless of the group.

CONCLUSIONS

Staging anterior cervical decompression and fusion with posterior cervical instrumented fusion 1 week apart does not decrease the incidence of perioperative complications.

Postoperative cement augmentation after 360-degree fixation for highly unstable vertebral fractures in patients with multiple myeloma: a technical note on delayed trans-instrumentation vertebroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although surgical fixation is usually not part of the first-line treatment of spinal lesions in patients with multiple myeloma, there are some unique clinical situations (such as the presence of acute onset of neurological deficits) in which spinal decompression and instrumentation may be required. In such scenario, because of the presence of poor bone quality, the strength of the spinal construct is of paramount importance. Although several studies have demonstrated the benefits of cement augmentation in increasing the pullout strength of pedicle screw fixation, the injection of cement during placement of pedicle screws may hamper the possibility of additional circumferential screw fixation. In addition, cement injection into vertebral bodies full of tumor and in the presence of adjacent epidural disease may incur in higher risks of tumor extravasation and worsening of neurological deficits than cement injection after initiation of adjuvant therapies.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The advantages of delayed trans-instrumentation vertebroplasty after 360-degree fixation are discussed in this technical note with an illustrative case of a patient with multiple myeloma presenting with cauda equina syndrome after a T12 compression fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the associated challenges of such an interventional procedure due to the presence of extensive hardware, carrying out delayed trans-instrumentation vertebroplasty after 360-degree circumferential fixations is not only feasible, but in our opinion, may constitute the best strategy to optimize the strength of spinal instrumentation in challenging scenarios involving poor bone quality, such as in patients with multiple myeloma.