1
|
Lassaletta L, Acle Cervera L, Altuna X, Amilibia Cabeza E, Arístegui Ruiz M, Batuecas Caletrio Á, Benítez Del Rosario J, Cabanillas Farpón R, Costales Marcos M, Escada P, Espinosa-Sánchez JM, García Leal R, Gavilán J, Gómez Martínez J, González-Aguado R, Martinez-Glez V, Guerra Jiménez G, Harguindey Antolí-Candela A, Hernández García BJ, Orús Dotú C, Polo López R, Manrique M, Martín Sanz E, Martínez Álvarez R, Martínez H, Martínez-Martínez M, Rey-Martinez J, Ropero Romero F, Santa Cruz Ruiz S, Vallejo LÁ, Soto Varela A, Varela-Nieto I, Morales Puebla JM. Clinical practice guideline on the management of vestibular schwannoma. ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA 2024; 75:108-128. [PMID: 38346489 DOI: 10.1016/j.otoeng.2023.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common tumour of the cerebellopontine angle. The greater accessibility to radiological tests has increased its diagnosis. Taking into account the characteristics of the tumour, the symptoms and the age of the patient, three therapeutic strategies have been proposed: observation, surgery or radiotherapy. Choosing the most appropriate for each patient is a frequent source of controversy. MATERIAL AND METHODS This paper includes an exhaustive literature review of issues related to VS that can serve as a clinical guide in the management of patients with these lesions. The presentation has been oriented in the form of questions that the clinician usually asks himself and the answers have been written and/or reviewed by a panel of national and international experts consulted by the Otology Commission of the SEORL-CCC. RESULTS A list has been compiled containing the 13 most controversial thematic blocks on the management of VS in the form of 50 questions, and answers to all of them have been sought through a systematic literature review (articles published on PubMed and Cochrane Library between 1992 and 2023 related to each thematic area). Thirty-three experts, led by the Otology Committee of SEORL-CCC, have analyzed and discussed all the answers. In Annex 1, 14 additional questions divided into 4 thematic areas can be found. CONCLUSIONS This clinical practice guideline on the management of VS offers agreed answers to the most common questions that are asked about this tumour. The absence of sufficient prospective studies means that the levels of evidence on the subject are generally medium or low. This fact increases the interest of this type of clinical practice guidelines prepared by experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Lassaletta
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Xabier Altuna
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | - Emilio Amilibia Cabeza
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Arístegui Ruiz
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel Batuecas Caletrio
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jesús Benítez Del Rosario
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | - María Costales Marcos
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Pedro Escada
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital de Egas Moniz, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Juan Manuel Espinosa-Sánchez
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (ibs.GRANADA), Granada, Spain
| | - Roberto García Leal
- Servicio de Neurocirugía, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Gavilán
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Justo Gómez Martínez
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | - Rocío González-Aguado
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Victor Martinez-Glez
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gloria Guerra Jiménez
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil de las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | | | - Cesar Orús Dotú
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rubén Polo López
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Manrique
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Eduardo Martín Sanz
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Henry Martínez
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Clínica San Rafael, Sur Bogotá D. C., Colombia; Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital San José, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Jorge Rey-Martinez
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
| | | | - Santiago Santa Cruz Ruiz
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Luis Ángel Vallejo
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Andrés Soto Varela
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Departamento de Cirugía y Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Isabel Varela-Nieto
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Grupo de Audición y Mielinopatías, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas Alberto Sols, CSIC-UAM, CIBERER-ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Manuel Morales Puebla
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Byun J, Kim JH, Song SW, Kim YH, Hong CK, Kim JH. Fate of Residual Tumor After Subtotal Resection of a Previously Irradiated Vestibular Schwannoma: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Single-Institutional Series. World Neurosurg 2022; 163:e207-e214. [PMID: 35342030 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The fate of residual tumor after salvage surgery for recurrent vestibular schwannoma (VS) after radiosurgery has not been elucidated so far. We reviewed our surgical series of salvage surgery for recurrent VS, with focus on the natural history of the residual tumor after salvage surgery. METHODS This study enrolled 14 patients who underwent salvage surgical resection in our institute and were followed up for >12 months. RESULTS The study included 3 men and 11 women with a median age of 55 years (range: 16-70 years). The median pre-stereotactic radiosurgery tumor volume was 6591 mm3. All patients were treated using gamma knife radiosurgery. The median duration from gamma knife radiosurgery to surgery was 52 months (range: 10-116 months). Solid tumor growth and cyst formation were observed in 6 (42.9%) and 8 (57.1%) patients, respectively. Subtotal resection and partial resection were performed in 13 (92.8%) patients, and gross total resection was achieved in only one (7.2%) patient. Postoperative facial paresis and surgical complication occurred in 5 (35.7%) and 2 (14.3%) patients, respectively. After salvage resection for irradiated VS, no patient showed tumor progression or recurrence during the follow-up period (13 subtotal/partial resections and 1 total resection). In addition, 2 patients in the subtotal resection group showed residual tumor shrinkage after salvage surgery during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS The behavior of residual tumors after salvage surgery for irradiated VS was stable. Adjuvant treatment for these residual tumors may not be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joonho Byun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Jong Hyun Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Woo Song
- Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Ki Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Hoon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The epidemiology of male hypogonadism has been understudied. Of the known causes of endogenous androgen deficiency, only Klinefelter syndrome is common with a likely population prevalence of greater than 5:10,000 men (possibly as high as 10-25:10,000). Mild traumatic injury might also be a common cause of androgen deficiency (prevalence 5-10:10,000 men), but large, long-term studies must be completed to confirm this prevalence estimation that might be too high. The classic causes of male androgen deficiency-hyperprolactinemia, pituitary macroadenoma, endogenous Cushing syndrome, and iron overload syndrome-are rare (prevalence < 10,000 men).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthi Thirumalai
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356420, 1959 Northeast Pacific Avenue, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Bradley D Anawalt
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356420, 1959 Northeast Pacific Avenue, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ogino A, Lunsford LD, Long H, Johnson S, Faramand A, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Kano H. Stereotactic radiosurgery as the primary management for patients with Koos grade IV vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 2021; 135:1058-1066. [PMID: 33578383 DOI: 10.3171/2020.8.jns201832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While extensive long-term outcome studies support the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for smaller-volume vestibular schwannomas (VSs), its role in the management for larger-volume tumors remains controversial. METHODS Between 1987 and 2017, the authors performed single-session SRS on 170 patients with previously untreated Koos grade IV VSs (volumes ranged from 5 to 20 cm3). The median tumor volume was 7.4 cm3. The median maximum extracanalicular tumor diameter was 27.5 mm. All tumors compressed the middle cerebellar peduncle and distorted the fourth ventricle. Ninety-three patients were male, 77 were female, and the median age was 61 years. Sixty-two patients had serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson [GR] grades I and II). The median margin dose was 12.5 Gy. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 5.1 years, the progression-free survival rates of VSs treated with a margin dose ≥ 12.0 Gy were 98.4% at 3 years, 95.3% at 5 years, and 90.7% at 10 years. In contrast, the tumor control rate after delivery of a margin dose < 12.0 Gy was 76.9% at 3, 5, and 10 years. The hearing preservation rates in patients with serviceable hearing at the time of SRS were 58.1% at 3 years, 50.3% at 5 years, and 35.9% at 7 years. Younger age (< 60 years, p = 0.036) and initial GR grade I (p = 0.006) were associated with improved serviceable hearing preservation rate. Seven patients (4%) developed facial neuropathy during the follow-up interval. A smaller tumor volume (< 10 cm3, p = 0.002) and a lower margin dose (≤ 13.0 Gy, p < 0.001) were associated with preservation of facial nerve function. The probability of delayed facial neuropathy when the margin dose was ≤ 13.0 Gy was 1.1% at 10 years. Nine patients (5%) required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt because of delayed symptomatic hydrocephalus. Fifteen patients (9%) developed detectable trigeminal neuropathy. Delayed resection was performed in 4% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Even for larger-volume VSs, single-session SRS prevented the need for delayed resection in almost 90% at 10 years. For patients with minimal symptoms of tumor mass effect, SRS should be considered an effective alternative to surgery in most patients, especially those with advanced age or medical comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akiyoshi Ogino
- Departments of1Neurological Surgery and
- 3Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Departments of1Neurological Surgery and
- 3Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Hao Long
- Departments of1Neurological Surgery and
- 3Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | | | - Andrew Faramand
- Departments of1Neurological Surgery and
- 3Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Departments of1Neurological Surgery and
- 3Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - John C Flickinger
- 2Radiation Oncology, and
- 3Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- Departments of1Neurological Surgery and
- 3Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Puataweepong P, Dhanachai M, Swangsilpa T, Sitathanee C, Ruangkanchanasetr R, Hansasuta A, Pairat K. Long-term clinical outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using the CyberKnife ® robotic radiosurgery system for vestibular schwannoma. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:e247-e254. [PMID: 34310064 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM The study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) with frameless robotic whole-body radiosurgery system (CyberKnife® ). METHODS This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data included 123 consecutive patients with VS treated at the Radiosurgery center, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. SRS was recommended for patients with unserviceable hearing and Koos grade I-III tumors, and HSRT for patients with serviceable hearing or Koos grade III-IV tumors. Between March 2009 and December 2015, 23 patients (19%) were treated with SRS, whereas 100 (81%) received HSRT. The commonly used regimen was 12 Gy in one fraction for SRS and 18 Gy in three fractions for HSRT. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 72 months (range: 12-123 months), the 5-year and 8-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for the whole cohort were 96% and 92%, respectively. The PFS was not significantly different between the SRS and HSRT groups (p = 0.23). Among 28 patients with serviceable hearing in the HSRT group, the 5-year and 8-year hearing preservation rates were 87% and 65%, respectively. The rate of nonauditory complications was 14%. Koos grade III/IV was a predictor of disease progression and was associated with nonauditory complications. CONCLUSION SRS and HSRT with the CyberKnife® system provided excellent long-term tumor control with a low rate of nonauditory complications. HSRT may result in acceptable hearing preservation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Putipun Puataweepong
- Radiation and Oncology Unit, Department of Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Mantana Dhanachai
- Radiation and Oncology Unit, Department of Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thiti Swangsilpa
- Radiation and Oncology Unit, Department of Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chomporn Sitathanee
- Radiation and Oncology Unit, Department of Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Rawee Ruangkanchanasetr
- Radiation and Oncology Unit, Department of Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ake Hansasuta
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kumuthinee Pairat
- Radiosurgery Center, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Johnson S, Kano H, Faramand A, Pease M, Nakamura A, Hassib M, Spencer D, Sisterson N, Faraji AH, Arai Y, Monaco E, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD. Long term results of primary radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas. J Neurooncol 2019; 145:247-255. [PMID: 31535315 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03290-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a primary option for management for both newly diagnosed vestibular schwannomas (VS), as well as VS that enlarge after initial observation. METHODS A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained data base found 871 patients who underwent Gamma knife® SRS as their initial (primary) management between 1987 and 2008. Follow-up ranged from 1-25 years (median = 5.2 years) Median tumor volume was 0.9 cc (0.02-36) and median margin dose was 13 Gy (12-25). RESULTS Progression free survival (PFS) after SRS was 97% at 3 years, 95% at 5 years, and 94% at 10 years. Freedom from delayed surgical resection was found in 98.7% of patients. Smaller tumor volume was significantly associated with improved PFS. There were 326 patients with serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson 1 or 2) at the time of SRS with audiological follow-up of ≥ 1 year. Serviceable hearing preservation rates after SRS were 89.8% at 1 year, 76.9% at 3 years, 68.4% at 5 years, 62.5% at 7 years, and 51.4% at 10 years. Factors associated with improved serviceable hearing preservation included younger age, Gardner-Robertson grade 1 at SRS, and absence of subjective complaints of dysequilibrium or vertigo (vestibulopathy). Fifty-one patients (5.8%) developed trigeminal neuropathy. Fourteen (1.6%) developed a transient House-Brackmann grade 2 or 3 facial neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS In this report with extended follow-up, primary SRS achieved tumor growth control in 94% of patients. Optimization of long- term cranial nerve outcomes remains an important achievement of this management strategy for VS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Johnson
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. .,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. .,Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Presbyterian, Suite B-400, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| | - Andrew Faramand
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Matthew Pease
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Aya Nakamura
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Mohab Hassib
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - David Spencer
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Nathaniel Sisterson
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Amir H Faraji
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Yoshio Arai
- Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Edward Monaco
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - John C Flickinger
- Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.,The Center for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|