Safety profiles of aromatase inhibitors and selective estrogen-receptor modulators in the treatment of early breast cancer

Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of implementing a 12-week home-based aerobic and resistance exercise program for breast cancer patients receiving endocrine treatment in Indonesia: A mixed methods study

Objectives

To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of implementing a home-based aerobic and resistance exercise for patients with breast cancer receiving endocrine treatment in Indonesia.

Methods

This is a mixed methods study with concurrent design consisting of quantitative single-arm pre-post intervention and qualitative study. We recruited patients with breast cancer (N = 36) receiving endocrine treatment and assigned 12 weeks of home-based pedometer-driven walking and resistance exercises using therapeutic bands. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the feasibility (recruitment, retention, and adherence) and safety. The modified Bruce treadmill test was used to measure predicted aerobic capacity (V̇O2 peak). Quality of life and fatigue were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and fatigue severity scale. Measurements were performed at baseline and post-intervention and analyzed with the paired t-test or Wilcoxon test. Semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis were conducted post-intervention to explore patients' acceptability.

Results

The results showed a recruitment rate of 75%, retention rate of 89%, and adherence rates were 53% for aerobic and 78% for resistance exercise. No severe adverse events were reported. Post-intervention interviews identified positive attitudes toward the intervention, with low burden and high perceived benefit. Exercise duration and predicted V̇O2 peak increased significantly (+1.1 min, p = 0.001 and +2.3 ml/kg/min, p = 0.043), but no significant change was detected for Quality of Life (p > 0.050) or fatigue severity (p = 0.299).

Conclusions

A home-based aerobic and resistance exercise was feasible when implemented in the context of routine care in our study population, improving predicted aerobic capacity. Further research is required to understand limited changes to Quality of Life and fatigue and adaptations to support implementation in additional sites in Indonesia.

Comparison of dyslipidemia incidence in Chinese early-stage breast cancer patients following different endocrine therapies: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is lack of large-scale real-world research evidence showing the impact of endocrine therapy on blood lipids in Chinese breast cancer patients, especially those with premenopausal breast cancer. Based on a large breast cancer cohort at West China Hospital, we aimed to compare the risk of dyslipidemia between premenopausal and postmenopausal women based on the endocrine therapy used.

METHODS

A total of 1,883 early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients who received endocrine monotherapy [selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) and aromatase inhibitor (AI), with or without ovarian function suppression] with normal blood lipid levels at baseline were retrospectively included between October 2008 and April 2017. Dyslipidemia was defined as an abnormality in cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein, and total cholesterol (TC) levels. The risk accumulation function was used to calculate the incidence of dyslipidemia in order to assess the absolute risk, while the multivariate Cox regression model was used to calculate the relative risk of dyslipidemia between the groups.

RESULTS

Patients with EBC were followed up for 60 months to monitor their blood lipid levels. The accumulated 5-year incidence of dyslipidemia in postmenopausal patients was higher than that in premenopausal patients (adjusted HR [95% confidence interval], 1.25 [1.01-1.56], 41.7% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.045). In premenopausal patients, the risk of abnormal TC was significantly higher in the OFS+AI group compared with that in the SERM group (adjusted HR [95% CI], 6.24 [3.19-12.20], p < 0.001, 5-year abnormal rates: 21.5% vs. 2.4%), and that of abnormal LDL-C level also increased (adjusted HR [95% CI], 10.54 [3.86-28.77], p < 0.001, 5-year abnormal rates: 11.1% vs. 0.9%). In postmenopausal patients, the risk of abnormal TC or LDL-C levels showed a similar trend in the AI and SERM groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to postmenopausal patients, dyslipidemia is also common in premenopausal Chinese patients with EBC who received endocrine therapy. Irrespective of menopausal status, AI treatment increases the risk of TC/LDL-C dyslipidemia than SERM treatment.

Perils of prolonged ovarian suppression and hypoestrogenism in the treatment of breast cancer: Is the risk of treatment worse than the risk of recurrence?

Premenopausal breast cancer is usually estrogen receptor positive, and hence, prolonged ovarian suppression by medical or surgical means to prevent recurrence has become standard of management to improve disease-free survival. Ten-year adjuvant tamoxifen therapy is associated with 3.5% fewer recurrences compared to five years. The SOFT trial demonstrated small but statistically significant incremental improvements in long-term disease-free survival by the addition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog treatment (triptorelin) to an aromatase inhibitor (exemestane). Profound hypoestrogenism in the premenopausal age group may not be well tolerated due to a host of bothersome side effects (primarily vasomotor symptoms, musculoskeletal complaints, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, and mood disorders). Prolonged hypoestrogenism in younger women is associated with premature development of cardiovascular disease, bone loss, cognitive decline, and all-cause mortality. This paper explores multi-system consequences of prolonged hypoestrogenism in premenopausal women derived from studies of women with and without breast cancer. Pretreatment counseling in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer should emphasize the benefit of prolonged estrogen suppression on breast cancer recurrence and established risks of lifelong hypoestrogenism on quality of life and all-cause mortality. Future genomic research may help identify the best candidates for extended ovarian suppression to avoid treating many women when only a minority benefit.

Investigation of genotoxicity risk and DNA repair capacity in breast cancer patients using anastrozole

OBJECTIVE:

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide and the incidence increases in postmenopausal women. Anastrozole is a non-steroidal (type II), third-generation aromatase inhibitor (AI) that is used in the treatment of postmenopausal estrogen-related breast cancer. Several studies have been conducted to assess the efficacy, safety, and superiority of AIs to tamoxifen; however, a literature search did not reveal a study that investigated the genotoxic potential of AIs. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible DNA damage risk profile and individual DNA repair capacity of patients using anastrozole with the modified alkaline comet assay in order to contribute to public health and health economics.

METHODS:

Women diagnosed with breast cancer after menopause comprised the study group. Six patients who had taken anastrozole for at least 6 months were retrospectively enrolled, and 12 patients who had not yet received treatment were prospectively enrolled as a control group. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were used to measure oxidized DNA damage using formamidopyrimidine DNA-glycosylase (FPG) and endonuclease III (endo III) in a modified comet assay. Individual DNA repair capacity was evaluated with the comet assay after a hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) challenge to examine the difference in DNA damage susceptibility.

RESULTS:

Analysis of DNA damage, oxidative base damage, susceptibility to DNA damage, and repair capacity revealed no significant difference between the control group and the patients taking anastrozole (p>0.05). Susceptibility to H₂O₂ damage was observed to increase with age (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION:

According to the results obtained in this study, anastrozole did not contribute to oxidative DNA damage. An H₂O₂ challenge with the comet assay is useful to evaluate circumstances of increased vulnerability to damage, such as aging and cancer.

National use of total hip arthroplasty among patients with a history of breast, lung, prostate, colon or bladder cancer-an analysis of the Medicare population

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common and growing procedure in the United States. Concomitantly, there has been a rise in patients diagnosed with certain types of malignancies including solid organ ones. Unfortunately there is limited data available in the literature that describes the use of THA in patients who concomitantly have one of these forms of cancer. Because of the limited data available in the literature regarding this topic, the purpose of this study was to analyze the trends in use of THA among patients with the five most common malignancies in the United States, which include breast, lung, prostate, colon and bladder cancer according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of the entire Medicare patient population to analyze the use of THA in patients with a diagnosis of solid organ malignancy including breast, lung, prostate, colon and bladder cancer.

Results

Our analysis of over 14 million patients, demonstrate that THA is not as commonly performed procedure in patients with such diagnoses with a 0.26% prevalence. The mean incidence of THA was 0.29%, 0.17%, 0.31%, 0.33% and 0.36% for patients with breast, lung, prostate, colon and bladder cancer respectively.

Conclusions

THA in cancer patients are not frequently performed but the use of this technique has increased significantly in patients with lung, prostate and bladder cancer.

Improvement of Bone Physiology and Life Quality Due to Association of Risedronate and Anastrozole

The endocrine therapy is the new frontiers of many breast cancers hormone sensitive. Hormone therapy for treating women with hormone receptor-positive cancer suppresses breast cancer growth either by reducing estrogen synthesis or by interfering with the action of estrogen within tumor cells. In this prospective randomized observational study we investigate the effect of adjuvant anastrozole in monotherapy or associated with risedronate on bone physiology and quality of life in postmenopausal, hormone-sensitive early breast cancer women at mild to moderate risk of fragility fractures.

Methods : 84 women were randomly assigned to receive anastrozole alone (group A) or anastrozole plus oral risedronate (group A+R). At baseline and after 24 months lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD were evaluated with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was examined using the short-form healthy survey.

Results : After 24 months, the group A+R has showed a significant increase in T-score for LS (p < 0.05) and for FN (p < 0.05) whereas women of group A had a statistically significant rate of bone loss both in LS T-score (p < 0.05) and in FN (p < 0.05). A significant change in T-score BMD was seen for group A+R compared with group A at the LS (p = 0.04) and at FN (p = 0.04). Finally, group A+R showed an overall significant improvement of health profile (SF-36) in group A (p = 0.03).

Conclusion : Postmenopausal breast cancer women with osteopenia during treatment with anastrozole have considerable risk of developing osteoporosis during the first 2 years; preventive measures such as healthy lifestyle and daily supplements of calcium and vitamin D alone seem to be insufficient in holding their bones healthy. Our findings suggest the usefulness of addition of risedronate in order to prevent aromatase inhibitors-related bone loss, not only in case of high-risk of fractures, but also for women at mild-moderate risk. This determines a significant improvement in bone health and a positive impact on HRQoL.

Risk factors for joint symptoms in postmenopausal Japanese breast cancer patients treated with anastrozole: a prospective multicenter cohort study of patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Endocrine treatment-related adverse events have a strong impact on patients' quality of life and sometimes result in treatment discontinuation. Since joint symptoms are the most frequently recognized side effect of aromatase inhibitors, evaluation of associated risk factors may yield significant findings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 391 postmenopausal Japanese women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and treated with adjuvant anastrozole were enrolled from 28 centers for assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in this prospective cohort study (SAVS-JP, UMIN000002455). Patients completed the self-report questionnaire at baseline and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of treatment for evaluation of frequency of treatment-related joint symptoms (arthralgia, decrease in range of joint motion, and joint stiffness).

RESULTS

We obtained PROs from 362 patients (92.6 %) at baseline and at one or more subsequent points. New or worsening from baseline of joint symptoms were reported by 260 patients (71.8 %). More than 90 % of the symptoms were mild or moderate and nearly 80 % had occurred by 6 months. Multivariate analysis showed that a short time span after menopause [odds ratio (OR) 0.95, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.90-0.99; P = 0.02] and adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 2.29, 95 % CI 1.06-4.95; P = 0.03) were significant independent risk factors for joint symptoms. No significant relationships between body mass index (BMI) and joint symptoms were identified. Eighteen patients discontinued treatment during the 1st year and eight of them reported joint symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Taking into consideration that PROs may yield higher prevalence rates than physician ratings for symptoms published in pivotal clinical trials, we found that a short time span after menopause and use of adjuvant chemotherapy, but not high BMI, were significantly associated with joint symptoms. These findings might prove useful for counseling before initiating treatment with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal Japanese women.

A prospective, randomized study on hepatotoxicity of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen in women with breast cancer

Tamoxifen and anastrozole are widely used as adjuvant treatment for early stage breast cancer, but their hepatotoxicity is not fully defined. We aimed to compare hepatotoxicity of anastrozole with tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Three hundred and fifty-three Chinese postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer were randomized to anastrozole or tamoxifen after optimal primary therapy. The primary end-point was fatty liver disease, defined as a liver–spleen ratio <0.9 as determined using a computed tomography scan. The secondary end-points included abnormal liver function and treatment failure during the 3-year follow up. The cumulative incidence of fatty liver disease after 3 years was lower in the anastrozole arm than that of tamoxifen (14.6% vs 41.1%, P < 0.0001; relative risk, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.21–0.45). However, there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of abnormal liver function (24.6% vs 24.7%, P = 0.61). Interestingly, a higher treatment failure rate was observed in the tamoxifen arm compared with anastrozole and median times to treatment failure were 15.1 months and 37.1 months, respectively (P < 0.0001; HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.20–0.37). The most commonly reported adverse events were ‘reproductive system disorders’ in the tamoxifen group (17.1%), and ‘musculoskeletal disorders’ in the anastrozole group (14.6%). Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant anastrozole displayed less fatty liver disease, suggesting that this drug had a more favorable hepatic safety profile than tamoxifen and may be preferred for patients with potential hepatic dysfunction.

Aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss and its management with bisphosphonates in patients with breast cancer

Postmenopausal women have an increased risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis due to loss of the bone-protective effects of estrogen. Disease-related processes may also contribute to the risk of bone loss in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. One of the most common and severe safety issues associated with cancer therapy for patients with breast cancer is bone loss and the associated increase in risk of fractures. This paper reviews the recent literature pertaining to aromatase inhibitor (AI)-associated bone loss, and discusses suggested management and preventative approaches that may help patients remain on therapy to derive maximum clinical benefit. A case study is presented to illustrate the discussion. We observed that AIs are in widespread use for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and are now recommended as adjuvant therapy, either as primary therapy or sequential to tamoxifen, for postmenopausal women. AIs target the estrogen biosynthetic pathway and deprive tumor cells of the growth-promoting effects of estrogen, and AI therapies provide benefits to patients in terms of improved disease-free survival. However, there is a concern regarding the increased risk of bone loss with prolonged AI therapy, which can be managed in many cases with the use of bisphosphonates and other interventions (eg, calcium, vitamin D supplementation, exercise).

Long-term benefits of 5 years of tamoxifen: 10-year follow-up of a large randomized trial in women at least 50 years of age with early breast cancer

PURPOSE

The Cancer Research UK "Over 50s" trial compared 5 and 2 years of tamoxifen in women with early breast cancer. Results are reported after median follow-up of 10 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1987 and 1997, 3,449 patients age 50 to 81 years with operable breast cancer who had been taking 20 mg of tamoxifen for 2 years were randomly assigned to either stop or continue for an additional 3 years, if they were alive and recurrence free. Data on recurrences, new tumors, deaths, and cardiovascular events were obtained (April 2010).

RESULTS

There were 1,103 recurrences, 755 deaths as a result of breast cancer, 621 cardiovascular (CV) events, and 236 deaths as a result of CV events. Fifteen years after starting treatment, for every 100 women who received tamoxifen for 5 years, 5.8 fewer experienced recurrence, compared with those who received tamoxifen for 2 years. The risk of contralateral breast cancer was significantly reduced (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.00). Among women age 50 to 59 years, there was a 35% reduction in CV events (P = .005) and 59% reduction in death as a result of a CV event (P = .02); in older women, the effect was much smaller and not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Taking tamoxifen for the recommended 5 years reduces the risk of recurrence or contralateral breast cancer 15 years after starting treatment. It also lowers the risk of CV disease and death as a result of a CV event, particularly among those age 50 to 59 years. Women should therefore be encouraged to complete the full course. Although aromatase inhibitors improve disease-free survival, tamoxifen remains a cheap and highly effective alternative, particularly in developing countries.

Guidelines for Osteoprotection in Breast Cancer Patients on an Aromatase Inhibitor

Postmenopausal women are at an increased risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis due to the physiologic loss of the bone protective effects of estrogen. Additionally, disease-related risk factors also contribute to the increased fracture risk. To further complicate matters, one of the most common and severe safety issues associated with cancer therapies for breast cancer patients is bone loss and the associated increased risk of fractures. These facts underscore the need to carefully monitor bone mineral density in patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer, and to consider adjuvant therapy that may help manage and/or prevent bone loss and fracture. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now in widespread clinical use for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and have replaced tamoxifen as the gold standard of care. AIs target the estrogen biosynthetic pathway and deprive tumor cells of the growth-promoting effects of estrogen. These treatments provide significant benefit to patients in terms of improved disease-free and overall survival. Adversely, there is a concern of an increased risk of bone loss with prolonged therapy consequently leading to an increased fracture risk. This manuscript will review the recent literature pertaining to AI-associated bone loss and discuss suggested management and preventative approaches that may help patients remain on therapy to derive the most clinical benefits.

Phase II Parallel Group Study Showing Comparable Efficacy Between Premenopausal Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Letrozole Plus Goserelin and Postmenopausal Patients Treated With Letrozole Alone As First-Line Hormone Therapy

Purpose

Goserelin and letrozole in premenopausal patients can result in clinical outcomes comparable to those obtained by letrozole alone in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Patients and Methods

A total of 73 patients with hormone-responsive MBC were included. Of those, 35 premenopausal patients received goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 28 days) plus letrozole (2.5 mg orally daily), and 38 postmenopausal patients received letrozole alone as their first-line endocrine therapy in a metastatic setting.

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups, except for a younger age (median, 41 v 53.5 years; P < .001) and a shorter disease-free interval (median, 1.8 v 3.3 years; P = .03) in the premenopausal group. Clinical benefit rates were comparable between the two groups (77% v 74%; P = .77). With the median follow-up of 27.4 months, there was no statistical difference in the median time to progression between the two groups (9.5 months [95% CI, 6.4 to 12.1 months] v 8.9 months [95% CI, 6.4 to 13.3 months]). In patients who did not receive bisphosphonate, letrozole ± goserelin caused a greater loss of bone mineral density at 6 months compared with that of patients receiving bisphosphonate treatment (premenopausal group, −16.7% v 53.9%; P = .002 and postmenopausal group, −13.3% v 17.4%; P = .04 at the lumbar spine).

Conclusion

Clinical efficacies in premenopausal MBC patients with combined letrozole and goserelin therapy were comparable to those in postmenopausal patients treated with letrozole alone. Although letrozole ± goserelin resulted in a modest increase in bone resorption, concurrent treatment with bisphosphonate could prevent bone loss at 6 months.

Long-term risk of receiving a total hip replacement in cancer patients

AIM

To investigate whether cancer patients have an increased risk of receiving a total hip replacement compared to the standard population of Norway.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

By linking of The Cancer Register of Norway and The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register we obtained information on cancer diagnoses (type, date of diagnosis), total hip arthroplasties and date of death for all patients living in Norway. This includes 741,901 patients categorized into three groups: 652,197 patients with at least one cancer diagnosis but no hip arthroplasties, 72,469 patients with at least one hip arthroplasty but no cancer diagnosis and 17,235 patients who have at least one cancer diagnosis and at least one hip arthroplasty. Within this latter group, 8563 individuals had been diagnosed with cancer prior to a total hip arthroplasty. Statistical methods applied in this study were Cox interval censored regression models and standardized incidence ratios (SIR).

RESULTS

Cancer patients had a slightly increased risk of receiving a total hip arthroplasty compared to the Norwegian population (SIR=1.15 (95% CI, 1.12-1.17)). For primary tumours located cranially to the pelvic area there was no significant increase in risk for hip arthroplasty. An exception was breast cancer (SIR=1.13 (95% CI 1.08-1.18)). Cancer located in the pelvic region (SIR=1.20 (95% CI 1.16-1.24)), malignant lymphoma (SIR=1.30 (95% CI 1.15-1.46)) and leukaemia (SIR=1.17 (95% CI 1.01-1.34)) had an increased risk for receiving a total hip arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Cancer survivors, mainly those with pelvic and lympho-hematological malignancies, have a small statistically significant increase in risk for receiving total hip arthroplasty.

Clinical usefulness of high-dose toremifene in patients relapsed on treatment with an aromatase inhibitor

BACKGROUND

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been employed as adjuvant therapy or as treatment for recurrent cases. However, when AI treatment fails, it is unclear which endocrine therapy is the most appropriate to introduce at this point and how effective it will be. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of toremifene (TOR, Fareston(®)), a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM).

METHODS

Patients with recurrent or advanced breast cancer who had measurable or evaluable lesions, and were diagnosed as having progressive disease during AI treatment and subsequently given TOR at 120 mg/day (TOR120) as endocrine therapy were selected and analyzed retrospectively in relation to their medical history.

RESULTS

Of a total of 83 cases examined, 80 were evaluable. The objective response rate (ORR) was 15.0% (12/80), the clinical benefit (CB) rate was 45.0% (36/80), and median time to failure (TTF) was 7.8 months. TOR120 was also effective in the progressive disease cases relapsed on AI treatment. When TOR120 was used, as a first-, second- or third-line treatment, the CB rate was 57% (32/56); this fell to 17% (4/24) when TOR120 was used as a fourth-line or later treatment. There was no response in the five estrogen receptor (ER)-negative cases, compared with an ORR of 15% (10/67) in ER-positive cases. In cases with a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) score of 0, 1+, and 2+, the ORR was 11% (7/61), while there was no response in the five cases with scores of 3+. TOR120 was effective in cases previously treated with tamoxifen (TAM), with an ORR and CB rate of 12 and 29%, respectively. The last AI used was anastrozole in 30 cases and examestane in 46; the response rates to TOR120 were similar in both groups. With regard to adverse effects, hot flushes and/or night sweating was observed in 10 and 12 cases, respectively, but all of them were categorized as grade 1, and the treatment was rated excellent in acceptability.

CONCLUSIONS

TOR120 was rated excellent in acceptability, and high efficacy was observed when it was used up to third-line treatment for AI-failure cases, although this study may show some selection bias because of the retrospective study. In addition, it was also considered effective for TAM-failure cases.