How do Japanese gynecologists view hormone replacement therapy for survivors of endometrial cancer? Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) survey

Impact of estradiol in inducing endometrial cancer using RL95-2

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecological malignancy that originates from the inner lining of the uterus and predominantly affects postmenopausal women. Prolonged exposure to estrogen, family history of endometrial cancer, obesity, and hormonal imbalance are some of the risk factors associated with endometrial cancer. In our study, we investigated the effect of estradiol, a potent form of estrogen at various concentrations on endometrial cell line RL95-2.

METHODS

Endometrial cell RL95-2 were cultured in DMEM medium with optimal conditions required to maintain the cells. MTT assay and colony formation assay were further performed after treating the cells with different concentrations of estradiol (1, 10, and 100 nM) and TAM (100 nM). Moreover, the effect of genes regulated by estradiol was also examined using microarray and validated using real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).

RESULTS

Time-dependent MTT assay shows a significant change in the ability of the cells to survive relative to concentrations. Colony formation was found to be directly proportional to the concentration of the estradiol (p < 0.05). Among genes, MMP14 (p = 0.03), SPARCL1 (p = 0.005), and CLU (p = 0.06) showed a significant up-regulation in their expression after estradiol treatment while NRN1 (p < 0.001) showed significant downregulation in expression pattern compared to control. However, the TAM treatment was found to be significantly effective after 72 h (p < 0.001) compared to control and 100 nM E2 (p = 0.0206).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that estradiol significantly contributes to regulating the viability, colony formation, and expression of genes associated with endometrial cancer.

Estrogen replacement therapy and non-hormonal medication use among patients with uterine cancer

OBJECTIVE

As the prognosis for endometrial cancer is excellent, management of the effects of estrogen deprivation has an important influence on quality of life. We examined the trends in the use of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and non-hormonal medications among patients with uterine cancer following surgery.

METHODS

The MarketScan Database was used to identify patients 18-49 years who underwent hysterectomy plus oophorectomy and those aged 50-75 years who underwent hysterectomy between 2008 and 2020. ERT and non-hormonal treatments of menopause were identified preoperatively and postoperatively. After propensity score balancing, difference-in-differences (DID) analyses were performed to compare the pre-and-postoperative changes in ERT and non-hormonal medication use between groups. The trends in postoperative use of ERT were assessed and tested using Cochran-Armitage trend tests.

RESULTS

A total of 19,700 patients with uterine cancer and 185,150 controls were identified. Overall, postoperative ERT use decreased for both age groups and for patients with and without uterine cancer. The DID in ERT use between those with uterine cancer and those with benign pathology after hysterectomy was -37.1% (95% CI, -40.5 to -33.6%) for patients 18-49 years of age and - 10.4% (95% CI, -10.9 to -9.9%) for those 50-75 years. The DID for non-hormonal medication use between those with uterine cancer and those with benign pathology after hysterectomy was 11.2% (95% CI, 7.8 to 14.7%) for younger patients and 3.4% (95% CI, 2.9 to 4.0%) for those 50-75 years. The postoperative new ERT use has been declining over time in patients with uterine cancer in those 18-49 years of age (P = .02) and those 50-75 years of age (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ERT is uncommon and has declined over time in patients with uterine cancer. Conversely, non-hormonal medications are more commonly used among patients with uterine cancer.

A case of solitary lymph node recurrence 9 years after initial treatment for advanced premenopausal endometrioid endometrial cancer; clinical usefulness of hormonal replacement therapy

There is no consensus on the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after treatment of advanced corpus cancer. We report a case of advanced corpus cancer at a young age, in which HRT was initiated 7 years after surgery, and regional lymph node recurrence was later detected. The patient was 35 years old at the time of initial treatment in X year, when she was diagnosed with stageIIIC2 corpus cancer and underwent a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and a retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. HRT was started at X + 7 years, and at X + 9 years, a 25 × 12-mm-sized mass was found in the hilum of the right kidney. A laparoscopic resection revealed regional lymph node recurrence of the corpus cancer. A retrospective study further revealed that a tumor measuring 12 × 3 mm was found at X + 3 years and grew to 18 × 7 mm in X + 6 years, just before the start of the HRT. We hypothesize that HRT did not induce tumor recurrence; instead, it allowed for long-term follow-up and early diagnosis.

Real-world practice of estrogen therapy after surgery for endometrial cancer: a descriptive study using a Japanese claims database

BACKGROUND

Estrogen therapy (ET) plays a key role in maintaining the post-surgical quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer. This study investigated the reality of the use of ET after endometrial cancer surgery in Japan.

METHODS

Using a healthcare database in Japan, patients who underwent surgery for endometrial cancer between the ages of 40 and 59 years from January 2006 to March 2021 were included. The cumulative prescriptions of ET after endometrial cancer surgeries in patients who had received chemotherapy or radiation therapy (adj-group) and those who did not (non-adj-group) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 1475 patients, 115 received ET, among whom transdermal estradiol was initiated in 100 (87.0%) individuals. The cumulative proportions of ET prescription 24 months after surgery [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] were 0.088 [0.072, 0.11] in the non-adj-group and 0.058 [0.040, 0.084] in the adj-group. The cumulative proportion [95% CI] of women who received ET at 24 months after surgeries decreased with increasing age, ranging from 0.29 [0.21, 0.38] in the 40‒44 years old to 0.009 [0.002, 0.034] in the 55‒59 years old women in the non-adj-group and from 0.17 [0.094, 0.31] in the 40‒44 years old to 0 in the 55‒59 years old women in the adj-group.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that ET after endometrial cancer surgery may be underused, even in women who underwent surgery between 40 and 44 years of age and without adjuvant therapy.

Prescription of hormone replacement therapy prior to and after the diagnosis of gynecological cancers in German patients

PURPOSE

Little is known about how a gynecological cancer diagnosis affects a gynecologist's decision to prescribe hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Therefore, the goal of this study was to analyze the prevalence of HRT prescription prior to and after the diagnosis of four gynecological cancers in women followed in gynecological practices in Germany.

METHODS

This study included women who were diagnosed with breast, uterine, ovarian, or vulvar cancer in 281 gynecological practices in Germany for the first time between January 2011 and December 2017. The first outcome of the study was the proportion of women with at least one HRT prescription in the year prior to and in the year after cancer diagnosis. The second outcome of the study was the proportion of gynecological practices that issued at least one HRT prescription in the year prior to and in the year after cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 7189 women were included in this study. The proportion of women receiving at least one HRT prescription significantly decreased between the year prior to and the year after cancer diagnosis in the breast cancer (16.3% versus 2.3%) and the uterine cancer groups (13.4% versus 5.8%), but not in the ovarian cancer (17.6% versus 15.1%) and the vulvar cancer groups (10.8% versus 13.1%). Similar findings were obtained for the proportion of gynecological practices that issued at least one HRT prescription.

CONCLUSION

HRT prescriptions significantly decreased after the diagnosis of breast and uterine cancers but not after the diagnosis of ovarian and vulvar cancers.

Gynecologists are afraid of prescribing hormone replacement to endometrial/ovarian cancer survivors despite national guidelines-a survey in Sweden

BACKGROUND

Prolonged survival in ovarian and endometrial cancer patients increases the importance of paying attention to quality of life. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) after gynecologic cancer has been controversial. With this survey, we sought to describe Swedish gynecologists' and gynecologic oncologists' attitudes towards prescribing HRT to these cancer survivors and see if prescribing practice is consistent with the available evidence and national guidelines.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A web-based survey containing three hypothetical cases with a total of 15 questions was distributed to gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists in Sweden. Respondents were asked about their HRT prescription practices in endometrial/ovarian cancer patients with moderate to severe menopausal symptoms.

RESULTS

In total 262 gynecologists and 24 gynecologic oncologists answered the survey. In the low-risk endometrial cancer case a majority of the gynecologists (55%) and gynecologic oncologists (66.7%) would prescribe local estrogen. A total of 30% of the gynecologists would prescribe estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in the high-risk endometrial cancer case compared to 58.3% of the gynecologic oncologists. The gynecologic oncologists felt more comfortable treating patients with endometrial cancer than did gynecologists, and the gynecologists were more likely to read the national guidelines. In the ovarian cancer case, 63.7% of the gynecologists would prescribe HRT compared to 92% of the gynecologic oncologists.

CONCLUSION

Swedish gynecologic oncologists have a more favorable attitude towards HRT for endometrial/ovarian cancer patients and feel more comfortable treating their patients than do gynecologists. This study illustrates a need for education in these matters in order not to withhold HRT from women due to doctors' sometimes unjustified anxiety.

Contributions of the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) in Improving the Quality of Life in Women With Gynecological Malignancies

The Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) is leading Japan in the treatment of gynecological malignancies. The JGOG consists of three treatment committees focusing on uterine cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, and ovarian cancer. Each committee makes efforts to improve treatment and diagnosis. In addition, the Supportive and Palliative Care Committee was established in 2015. Novel studies of supportive care and palliative care have been initiated by this committee. Furthermore, surveys about not only treatment results such as overall survival rates but also quality of life (QOL) and cost-effectiveness assessments are performed by the ovarian cancer committee. Improvements of patients' QOL in the treatment of gynecological malignancies were divided into three concepts as follows: QOL associated with cancer treatment, health care after cancer therapy, and progression of cancer. In this review, we report the contributions and future plans for the improvement of QOL in patients with gynecological malignancies.