Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer

The validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus S-1 is not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel plus S-1(PTXS) has shown definite efficacy for advanced gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of this regimen in neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) are unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) PTXS and oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) regime for patients with LAGC.

METHODS

A total of 103 patients with LAGC (cT3/4NanyM0/x) who were treated with three cycles of neoadjuvant SOX regimen (n = 77) or PTXS regimen (n = 26) between 2011 and 2017 were enrolled in this study. NAC-related clinical response, pathological response, postoperative complication, and overall survival were analyzed between the groups.

RESULTS

The baseline data did not differ significantly between both groups. After NAC, the disease control rate of the SOX group (94.8%) was comparable with that of the PTXS group (92.3%) (p = 0.641). Twenty-three cases (29.9%) in the SOX group and 10 cases (38.5%) in the PTX group got the descending stage with no statistical difference (p = 0.417). No significant differences were observed in the overall pathological response rate and the overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). There were also no differences between groups in terms of 5-year overall and disease-free survival (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The validity of NAC PTXS was not inferior to that of SOX regimen for locally advanced gastric cancer in terms of treatment response and overall survival. PTXS regimen could be expected to be ideal neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LAGC and should be adopted for the test arm of a large randomized controlled trial.

Triplet versus doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the differences between doublet and triplet neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens in efficacy and safety profile.

METHODS

A total of 227 locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients who received NAC and sequential radical gastrectomy were reviewed. After propensity score matching (PSM), 140 patients with similar baseline characteristics were selected. Among them, 70 received doublet NAC regimens consisted of platinum and fluorouracil; the other 70 received triplet NAC regimens consisted of docetaxel, platinum, and fluorouracil.

RESULTS

The efficacy of doublet and triplet regimens was comparable after propensity score matching in terms of tumor regression (pathological complete response, Doublet 11.4% vs. Triplet 15.7%, p = 0.642), achieving of R0 resection (Doublet 88.6% vs. Triplet 88.6%, p = 1), 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) (Doublet 77.1% vs. Triplet 68.6%, p = 0.178), 3-years overall survival (OS) (Doublet 54.3% vs. Triplet 60.9%, p = 0.941). Post-surgery complications were more common in the triplet cohort (Doublet 5.7% vs. Triplet 27.1%, p = 0.001), especially abdominal infection (Doublet 0% vs. Triplet 11.1%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A more intense preoperative triplet NAC regimen does not bring extra downstage effect and survival benefit compared to a doublet regimen. It may even result in a higher risk of post-surgery complications.

Comparisons of effects of SOX and mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy regimens on patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

The neoadjuvant chemotherapy plays an important role in locally advanced gastric cancer, but its efficacy, safety profiles and clinical outcomes among different regimens still remain controversial. In this study, totally 231 eligible patients with locally advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. These patients were divided into the observation group (SOX regimen, n = 123) and control group (mFOLFOX6 regimen, n = 108) according to different chemotherapy regimens. Then, the differences in chemotherapy efficacy, adverse reactions, surgical characteristics, complications and survival condition were compared. No significant differences were observed in clinical efficacy of chemotherapy, the rate of D2 lymph node clearance, R0 resection, complications, responses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival condition between two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of abdominal pain, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (16.26% vs 29.63%, χ² = 5.893, P < 0.05; 11.38% vs 26.85%, χ² = 9.084, P < 0.05; 35.77% vs 53.70%, χ² = 7.499, P < 0.05). The SOX regimen and mFOLFOX6 regimen have similar chemotherapy efficacy for locally advanced gastric cancer, but SOX regimen has a lower risk of gastrointestinal adverse reactions comparing with mFOLFOX6 regimen.

Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel therapy for advanced gastric cancer patients treated previously with docetaxel-containing chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab (RAM) plus paclitaxel (PTX) therapy has shown promising results as a standard second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer patients. Recently, combined docetaxel (DOC) plus S-1 (DS) therapy could be regarded as the new standard adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with curatively resected stage III gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of RAM plus PTX therapy in patients treated previously with DOC-containing therapy remains unclear.

METHODS

This study assessed the clinical outcomes of RAM plus PTX therapy in advanced gastric cancer patients with or without a previous history of treatment with a DOC-containing regimen.

RESULTS

In a series of 107 consecutive patients enrolled for this study, the median PFS and OS were 4.2 and 6.2 months, respectively. Fifty-five patients had a history of prior therapy with DOC and 52 did not. There was no significant difference between with and without DOC groups in the ORR (22.2% vs. 23.5%), PFS (4.2 vs. 5.3 months), or OS (7.2 vs. 6.4 months). In a comparison taking into account the interval from the DOC-containing therapy to the RAM plus PTX therapy, the number of treatment courses was significantly smaller and the PFS significantly shorter in the patient group with an interval of ≤ 6 months (median, 2 vs 4.5 courses, P = 0.033; 3.4 months vs. 5.1 months, P = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

RAM plus PTX therapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer is effective even in patients who have previously received DOC-containing chemotherapy, especially if the interval is > 6 months.

A Retrospective Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Objective

To explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the doublet and triplet regimens of locally advanced gastric cancer.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 162 patients with gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including 74 patients receiving doublet regimen (fluorouracil/platinum) and 88 patients receiving triplet regimen (fluorouracil/platinum/Taxol). Patients in both groups received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for two cycles, and underwent surgical resection 4 weeks after the end of chemotherapy.

Results

The total clinical remission rate was 68.6% (105/153), the phase-down rate was 46.4% (71/153), and the pathological response rate was 59.9% (97/162). In the doublet and triplet regimen, the clinical remission rate was 65.7% (44/67) and 70.9% (61/86) (P = 0.708), the descending period rate was 41.8% (28/67) and 50.0% (43/86) (P = 0.485), and the pathological response rate was 51.4% (38/74) and 67.0% (59/88) (P = 0.190). The median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 162 patients were 36.0 and 58.5 months. In the doublet and triplet regimen, the median DFS was 38.0 and 34.0 months (P = 0.377), and the median OS was 59.0 and 56.5 months (P = 0.256). The side effects of the doublet group were significantly lower than those of the triplet group, with leucopenia rate of 45.9% (34/74) and 62.5% (55/88) (P = 0.035); thrombocytopenia rate of 18.9% (14/74) and 35.2% (31/88) (P = 0.021); nausea rate of 45.9% (34/74) and 64.8% (57/88) (P = 0.016), and diarrhea rate of 1.4% (1/74) and 9.1% (8/88) (P = 0.032).

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is safe and effective for locally advanced gastric cancer. The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the doublet group and the triplet group is equivalent, and the doublet group has better safety and tolerance.

Durable Response After Combination Of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy And Anti-PD-1 Therapy In HER2-Negative Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report

Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is difficult to treat with poor prognosis. Despite various possible treatments, the median survival time of such patients remains unsatisfactory. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches or combinations need to be further explored. We herein reported a case of a 54-year-old male patient who was initially diagnosed with HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer. Based on previous studies and patient's desire, we made a therapeutic plan: the combination of concurrent radiochemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy. After about 4 months of combined therapy, the patient showed satisfactory complete response to tumor lesions even metastatic lesions (CR, disappearance of all target lesions). In summary, the combination of concurrent SOX regimen chemotherapy, stomach radiotherapy and PD-1 antibody immunotherapy is effective in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Tumor blood supply may predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and survival in patients with gastric cancer

Objectives

We investigated the prognostic value of tumor blood supply in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 53 patients with advanced GC treated with FLEEOX chemotherapy. The tumor computed tomography (CT) enhancement value was measured before chemotherapy (CT1; arterial phase CT–plain phase CT). The liver parenchyma CT enhancement value (CT2) was also measured using the same method, to eliminate individual differences. Tumor blood supply was defined as good or poor based on the median CT1/CT2 values. We evaluated the relationships between tumor blood supply and response to chemotherapy, clinicopathologic characteristics, and overall survival (OS).

Results

A good blood supply (GBS) was associated with significantly better clinical and pathological responses to chemotherapy than a poor blood supply (PBS). The 3-year OS was 65.8% for the entire cohort. Patients with a GBS had a significantly higher OS (78.57%) than those with a PBS (54.44%). Additionally, patients with Bormann type III GC had a better blood supply than those with type II GC.

Conclusion

Patients with advanced GC and a GBS are more likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy than those with a PBS. Blood supply may thus be a predictor for chemotherapy response.

Outcomes of preoperative S-1 and docetaxel combination chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The therapeutic outcomes of stage III gastric cancer patient receiving D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy remain unsatisfactory. To improve the long-term outcomes in this population, the combination of docetaxel and S-1 (DS) therapy can be expected to be a useful regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of NAC-DS for clinical stage III gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2013, 26 patients were enrolled. Patients with clinical stage III gastric cancer received two courses of docetaxel 40 mg/m² on day 1, 15 and S-1 40 mg/m² bid orally on day 1-7, 15-21 every 4 weeks, followed by radical D2 gastrectomy. Short- and long-term outcomes were evaluated. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Yokohama City University, and was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) database (ID: 000011521).

RESULTS

Of 26 patients, 24 (92.3%) patients completed two courses of NAC. After NAC-DS, Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 5 (19.2%) patients including one patient with febrile neutropenia, anemia in 1 (3.8%) patient and diarrhea in 1 (3.8%) patient. All patients underwent R0 gastrectomy and pathological response was found in 15 (57.6%) patients. Postoperatively, Clavien-Dindo grade II complication occurred in 8 (30.7%) patients and no mortality was observed. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 57.7%, median OS was 78.7 months and recurrence free survival (RFS) was 49.0%, median RFS was 45.4 months with 66.5 months median follow-up. Pathological response (HR = 0.091, 95% CI 0.011-0.730, p = 0.016) and > 5% body weight loss before NAC-DS (HR = 0.133, 95% CI 0.023-0.765, p = 0.024) were independent risk factors for recurrence, > 5% body weight loss before NAC-DS (HR = 0.133, 95% CI 0.023-0.765, p = 0.024) were independent risk factors for overall survival by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC-DS demonstrated acceptable toxicity with a high R0 resection rate in clinical stage III gastric cancer patients, especially in patients with good nutritional status. Further prospective study is warranted to compare the long-term outcomes between with and without NAC-DS.

Efficacy after preoperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S1 (DOS) in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of the XELOX and DOS regimens as preoperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

All cases of locally advanced gastric cancer treated with the XELOX or DOS regimen were reviewed retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was carried out to reduce selection bias based on age, gender, location, Lauren type, carcinoembryonic antigen level, clinical tumor stage, and clinical node stage.

RESULTS

From January 2010 to December 2016, 248 patients were matched; 159 of them received the XELOX regimen and 89 the DOS regimen. The response rates in the XELOX and DOS groups were 34.5 and 38.1%, respectively (P = 0.823). After four cycles of chemotherapy, 111 patients (69.8%) in the XELOX group and 65 patients (73.0%) in the DOS group underwent radical surgery (P = 0.485). The median progression-free survival (33.0 months vs. 18.7 months, P = 0.0356) and the median overall survival (43.8 months vs. 29.1 months, P = 0.0003) were longer for patients who received the DOS regimen than for those who received the XELOX regimen. The occurrence of grade 3 to 4 toxicity was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For locally advanced gastric cancer patients, the DOS regimen showed more benefit than the XELOX regimen as preoperative chemotherapy, without any added toxicity effects.

Validity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer

Gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy plus postoperative chemotherapy is the standard treatment for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer in Japan. However, the prognosis of patients with serosa-positive tumors remains unsatisfactory because of peritoneal recurrence. This study aimed to investigate the validity of neoadjuvant therapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Thirty patients with locally advanced gastric cancer underwent neoadjuvant DCS therapy at Dokkyo Medical University Hospital between June 2013 and October 2015. Gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy were performed after two cycles of preoperative DCS therapy. The clinical responses of the primary gastric tumors based on endoscopic findings were partial response in 17 patients (57%) and stable disease in 13 patients (43%). Analysis of pathological response in the primary gastric lesions showed grade 1a in five patients (17%), grade 1b in nine patients (30%), grade 2 in 11 patients (37%), and grade 3 in five patients (17%). Twenty-four patients (80%) remained alive after a median follow-up period of 31 months. The 2- and 3-year overall survival rates in all patients were 89 and 70%, respectively. The 2-year overall survival rate in pathological responders (grade 1b-3) was 96%, compared with 50% in pathological non-responders (grade 1a) (P = 0.00187). Pathological responders had a significantly higher survival rate than non-responders. These results indicate that neoadjuvant DCS therapy may improve the prognosis in patients with serosa-positive locally advanced gastric cancer.

A decrease in the prognostic nutritional index is associated with a worse long-term outcome in gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

This study reviewed 54 patients with gastric cancer who underwent NAC and a subsequent R0 gastrectomy. The PNI before starting NAC and before gastrectomy were calculated using the following formula: 10 × serum albumin (g/dl) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm³). A multivariate analysis was performed to identify the predictors of overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The mean pre-NAC and preoperative PNI were 48.3 ± 5.1 and 48.2 ± 4.7, respectively (p = 0.934). The PNI decreased after NAC in 31 patients (57.4%). The pre-NAC PNI and preoperative PNI were not significantly associated with the OS rate. The 3-year OS rate in patients with the decreased PNI values was significantly lower than that in the patients whose PNI values were either maintained or increased (41 vs. 76.4%, p = 0.003). A multivariate analysis revealed that a decreased PNI value was an independent predictor of a poor OS (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Decreased PNI values were associated with worse long-term outcomes in gastric cancer patients undergoing NAC.

Dihydrotanshinone induces apoptosis of SGC7901 and MGC803 cells via activation of JNK and p38 signalling pathways

CONTEXT

Dihydrotanshinone (DHT), a natural compound from Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (Lamiaceae), showed higher cytotoxic potential compared with other tanshinones. Its effect and mechanism on gastric cancer have not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the effects of DHT on cell proliferation and apoptosis on gastric cancer cells, and elucidates its molecular mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human gastric cancer MGC803 and SGC7901 cells were treated with various concentrations of DHT (0-15 μM) for 24 and 48 h, and cell growth was measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay. Cell apoptosis was analysed by flow cytometry and DAPI staining. Western blots were performed to investigate changes in the level of apoptosis related genes in gastric cancer cell.

RESULTS

DHT exhibited obvious inhibition of the survival of gastric cancer cells. The IC₅₀ values in SGC7901 and MGC803 cells were 9.14 and 5.39 μM for 24 h, respectively. Cells treated with 6 μM DHT resulted in 41.3% and 35.4% apoptotic cell fractions in SGC7901 and MGC803 cells, respectively, significantly higher than that of the control. Hallmarks of apoptosis were observed in gastric cancer cells after DHT exposure. DHT enhanced the expression levels of cleaved caspase-3, caspase-9 and poly-ADP-ribose polymerases. Furthermore, DHT increased the phosphorylation of JNK and p38 in SGC7901 and MGC803 cells.

CONCLUSION

DHT induced growth inhibition and apoptosis of gastric cancer cells, involving activation of caspase proteins and the JNK/p38 signaling pathway. The results indicated that DHT has a promising chemotherapeutic potential for human gastric cancer.