Post-recurrence chemotherapy for mesothelioma patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy

Peritoneal Dissemination in Patients with Recurrence After Post-pleurectomy/decortication for Pleural Mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, peritoneal dissemination after curative-intent surgery for pleural mesothelioma occasionally recurs. This study investigated the risk factors and prognosis associated with post-pleurectomy/decortication peritoneal dissemination in pleural mesothelioma, which are rarely reported.

METHODS

This retrospective review included 160 patients who experienced recurrence after pleurectomy/decortication for pleural mesothelioma between January 2011 and December 2021. Patients with recurrence were classified according to the initial recurrence pattern. The P group experienced recurrence with peritoneal dissemination, and the non-P group experienced recurrence without peritoneal dissemination. The analysis determined the risk factors for peritoneal dissemination using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of the 160 patients, 20 (12.5%) exhibited peritoneal dissemination and were assigned to the P group, whereas 140 (87.5%) had recurrence without peritoneal dissemination and were assigned to the non-P group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that diaphragm reconstruction (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-8.0; p = 0.048) and female sex (OR, 3.7; 95% CI 1.26-10.8; p = 0.017) were associated with the P group. Post-recurrence survival was worse in the P group than in the non-P group (1-year post-recurrence survival: 22.2% vs. 65.3%; median: 6.7 months vs. 19.4 months; p = 0.0013).

CONCLUSIONS

Peritoneal dissemination occurred in approximately one of every eight patients with recurrence after pleurectomy/decortication for pleural mesothelioma, and the incidence was significantly higher among females and patients undergoing diaphragm reconstruction. Moreover, postoperative recurrence of peritoneal dissemination was associated with a poor prognosis.

Optimal surgery for resectable malignant pleural mesothelioma in the setting of multimodality treatment

The surgical treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) involves procedures to achieve macroscopic complete resection, depending on the patient's condition. We reviewed the evolution of surgical approaches for resectable MPM. Since surgery is no more than a single step in the set of processes in multimodality treatment (MMT), we concluded that these procedures should give precedence to lung preservation and minimize resection whenever possible. Postoperative quality of life must be prioritized when the patient can receive appropriate adjuvant therapy.

Second Surgery for Recurrent Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma after Multimodality Treatment: A Systematic Review

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive asbestos-related tumour with poor prognosis. To date, a multimodality treatment, including chemotherapy and surgery, with or without radiotherapy, is the gold standard therapy for selected patients with epithelioid and early-stage MPM. In this setting, the goal of surgery is to achieve the macroscopic complete resection, obtained by either extrapleural pneumonectomy or pleurectomy/decortication. Failure, in local and/or distant sites, is one of the major concerns; in fact, there has been no established treatment for the recurrence of MPM after the multimodal approach, and the role of surgery in this context is still controversial. By using electronic databases, studies that included recurrent MPM patients who underwent a second surgery were identified. The endpoints included were: a pattern of recurrence, post-recurrence survival (PRS), and the type of second surgery. When available, factors predicting better PRS and perioperative mortality and morbidity were collected. This systematic review offers an overview of the results that are currently obtained in patients undergoing a second surgery for relapsed MPM, with the aim to provide a comprehensive view on this subject that explores if a second surgery leads to an improvement in survival.

Relapse Patterns and Tailored Treatment Strategies for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Recurrence after Multimodality Therapy

To date, there have been no established therapies for recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) after multimodality treatment. Aims of this retrospective study are to analyze the recurrence pattern, its treatment and to identify the predictors of best oncological outcomes for relapsed MPM, comparing extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) vs. pleurectomy/decortication (PD). Study population: 94 patients with recurrence of MPM after multimodality treatment underwent macroscopic complete resection (52.1% with EPP and 47.9% with PD) between July 1994 and February 2020. Distant spread was the most frequent pattern of recurrence (71.3%), mostly in the EPP group, while the PD group showed a higher local-only failure rate. Post-recurrence treatment was administered in 86.2%, whereas best supportive care was administered in 13.8%. Median post-recurrence survival (PRS) was 12 months (EPP 14 vs. PD 8 months, p = 0.4338). At multivariate analysis, predictors of best PRS were epithelial histology (p = 0.026, HR 0.491, IC95% 0.263–0.916), local failure (p = 0.027, HR 0.707, IC95% 0.521–0.961), DFS ≥ 12 months (p = 0.006, HR 0.298, IC95% 0.137–0.812) and post-recurrence medical treatment (p = 0.046, HR 0.101, IC95% 0.897–0.936). The type of surgical intervention seems not to influence the PRS if patients are fit enough to face post-recurrence treatments. In patients with a prolonged disease-free interval, in the case of recurrence the most appropriate treatment seems to be the systemic medical therapy, even in the case of local-only relapse.

Outcomes of Conversion to Extrapleural Pneumonectomy From Pleurectomy/Decortication for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

In recent years, there has been a shift from extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) toward pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) as the preferred surgical technique. However, we occasionally encounter difficult cases wherein visceral pleurectomy requires conversion to EPP from P/D. We sought to clarify the preoperative risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with conversion to EPP. We compared and analyzed conversion to EPP and P/D between September 2012 and December 2019. Conversion to EPP was decided in case of diffuse tumor invasion to the pulmonary parenchyma or due to failure of decortication. Univariable regression analysis was performed to determine the association of preoperative variables with conversion to EPP. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Of the 181 patients who underwent intended P/D, 145 (80.1%) patients underwent P/D and 18 (9.9%) patients underwent conversion to EPP. The sum of 3-level pleural thickness (P < 0.001), maximum of 3-level pleural thickness (P = 0.006), and clinical T stage (P < 0.001) demonstrated association with conversion to EPP. Overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly worse in the conversion to EPP group (median overall survival, 29.2 months vs 57.0 months [P = 0.008]; median progression-free survival, 15.3 months vs 23.2 months [P = 0.005]. Our data show that approximately 1 of every 10 patients with P/D intention converted to EPP. Preoperative pleural thickness and clinical T stage may be risk factors associated with conversion to EPP. The survival rate of conversion to EPP was worse than that of P/D.

Three tumor markers for improved efficacy in the management of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

Background

Evaluation of tumor markers may facilitate follow-up of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We aimed was to evaluate the value of tumor markers for monitoring and predicting recurrence in patients with MPM.

Methods

In total, 152 patients who underwent curative-intent surgery after induction chemotherapy for MPM between July 2004 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative (≤3 months after surgery) levels of soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP), cytokeratin 19 fragment (Cyfra21-1), and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and rates of recurrence and non-recurrence were evaluated. Factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Of the 152 patients, the positive rates of preoperative SMRP, Cyfra21-1, and TPA, levels were 26.7%, 8.6%, 9.6%, respectively; the respective postoperative levels were 4.0%, 6.3%, and 6.5%; the respective levels in patients with recurrence were 39.3%, 31.4%, 28.6%; the respective levels in patients with no recurrence were 3.7%, 0.0%, 3.8%. Nearly half (45.2%) of the patients with recurrence exhibited an increase in one or more tumor marker levels. Multivariate analysis revealed that the preoperative positive rates of one or more of the three tumor markers (hazard ratio: 1.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.1–2.8; P=0.02) were independent significant predictors of recurrence.

Conclusions

The positive rates of SMRP, Cyfra21-1, and TPA in recurrence-free patients were extremely low, with high specificity. Preoperative levels of SMRP, Cyfra21-1, and TPA, which identified patients with a high risk for recurrence, could improve management of patients with MPM.

Initial evaluation of nivolumab in patients with post-operative recurrence of malignant pleural mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Limited options exist for treating post-recurrence patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of nivolumab in patients with post-operative recurrence of MPM in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This study included 35 patients with post-operative recurrence of MPM. Treatment consisted of 240-mg intravenous nivolumab administration every 2 weeks until progressive disease (PD) or serious adverse events (AEs). Additional post-treatment data were evaluated, including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), post-treatment survival and AEs. Tumor response was assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The feasibility analysis including AEs was performed with the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

RESULTS

Of the 35 patients who received nivolumab, median follow-up was 6 months. The median treatment duration was 3 months (range: 1-14 months), and median of 8 cycles (range: 2-32 cycles) was administered. Best overall responses were follows: 1 patient had complete response, 6 had partial response, 18 had stable disease and 8 had PD. The ORR was 20.0%, and the DCR was 77.1%. The median overall survival and PFS were 13.1 and 4.4 months, respectively. There were grade-3 AEs in four patients (11.4%). No grade-4 or -5 AEs were observed.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab treatment in patients with post-operative recurrence of MPM seems safe and clinical efficacy.