Optimal management of immune-related adverse events resulting from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a review and update. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23:410-420. [PMID: 29516216 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1259-6]

Psoriasis de novo or exacerbation by PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors

PD-1 (programmed Death-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors have provided significant benefits to tumor patients. However, a considerable proportion of the patients develop immune-related adverse events (irAEs), of which cutaneous irAEs (cirAEs, e.g., psoriasis) occur relatively early. This review provides an overview of the current progress in psoriasis de novo or exacerbation by PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. It not only describes the relevant influencing factors but also theoretically analyzes the immunological mechanisms that lead to the onset or exacerbation of psoriasis. Finally, the authors present guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis de novo or exacerbation by PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors. The review is intended to assist dermatologists in the early recognition and effective individualized management of such cirAE, which is helpful to continue or adjust the tumor-targeted immunotherapy on the basis of ensuring the quality of life of tumor patients.

Tumor-derived exosomal PD-L1: a new perspective in PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for lung cancer

Exosomes play a crucial role in facilitating intercellular communication within organisms. Emerging evidence indicates that a distinct variant of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), found on the surface of exosomes, may be responsible for orchestrating systemic immunosuppression that counteracts the efficacy of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) checkpoint therapy. Specifically, the presence of PD-L1 on exosomes enables them to selectively target PD-1 on the surface of CD8+ T cells, leading to T cell apoptosis and impeding T cell activation or proliferation. This mechanism allows tumor cells to evade immune pressure during the effector stage. Furthermore, the quantification of exosomal PD-L1 has the potential to serve as an indicator of the dynamic interplay between tumors and immune cells, thereby suggesting the promising utility of exosomes as biomarkers for both cancer diagnosis and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. The emergence of exosomal PD-L1 inhibitors as a viable approach for anti-tumor treatment has garnered significant attention. Depleting exosomal PD-L1 may serve as an effective adjunct therapy to mitigate systemic immunosuppression. This review aims to elucidate recent insights into the role of exosomal PD-L1 in the field of immune oncology, emphasizing its potential as a diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tool in lung cancer.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Opioids in Patients with Solid Tumours: Is Their Association Safe? A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent one of the most effective treatments for patients with cancer. As their activity relies on host immune system reactivity, the role of concomitant medications such as corticosteroids and antibiotics has been extensively evaluated. Preclinical data suggest that opioids may influence the immune system.

METHODS

a systematic literature revision was performed using specific keywords on the major search engines. Two authors analysed all the studies and provided a selection of the following inclusion and exclusion criteria, respectively: 1. data collection of patients older than 18 years old affected by solid tumours; 2. description of ICIs efficacy in terms of PFS, OS, TTF, and ORR; 3. concomitant ICIs-opioids treatment and 1. language different from English; 2. not pertinent analyses.

RESULTS

523 studies were analysed, and 13 were selected and included in our series. A possible negative interaction between oral opioids and ICIs efficacy was observed. Most evidence was retrospective, and studies were heterogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if oral opioids seem to impact negatively on ICIs efficacy in cancer patients, to date there is not sufficient evidence to avoid their prescription in this population.

Comprehensive analysis of treatment-related adverse events of immunotherapy in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIMS

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been recognized as an effective treatment for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (AG/GEJC). However, the safety of ICIs in patients has not been established. We aimed to systematically assess the risk of all common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in immunotherapy of AG/GEJC.

METHODS

A systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until May 2022 was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. And a meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

RESULTS

A total of nine RCTs, including 2918 patients, met the eligibility criteria. The pooled overall incidences of all grade TRAEs, grade 3 or higher TRAEs and treatment-related death were 54.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 48.7%-60.2%, I²=75.55%), 12.8% (95% CI: 10.2%-15.7%, I²=51.61%) and 0.11% (95% CI: 0.00%-0.51%, I²=1.63%). Subgroup analyses showed that CTLA-4 inhibitors had a higher risk of any type of TRAEs, when compared with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Meta-regression showed significant correlation between all grade TRAEs and proportion of female. Fatigue and diarrhoea were involved in common TRAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides a comprehensive overview of ICIs-associated AEs in AG/GEJC. Immunotherapy did not have a significantly increased risk experiencing any type of TRAEs, and ICIs had a more manageable safety profile than chemotherapy. These findings provide important guidance to clinicians in counseling and management of patients with AG/GEJC.

Chemotherapy-induced bowel ischemia: diagnostic imaging overview

Cancer patients need multimodal therapies to treat their disease increasingly. In particular, drug treatment, as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or various associations between them are commonly used to increase efficacy. However, the use of drugs predisposes a percentage of patients to develop toxicity in multiple organs and systems. Principle chemotherapy drugs mechanism of action is cell replication inhibition, rapidly proliferating cells especially. Immunotherapy is another tumor therapy strategy based on antitumor immunity activation trough agents as CTLA4 inhibitors (ipilimumab) or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as nivolumab. If, on the one hand, all these agents inhibit tumor growth, on the other, they can cause various degrees toxicity in several organs, due to their specific mechanism of action. Particularly interesting are bowel toxicity, which can be clinically heterogeneous (pain, nausea, diarrhea, enterocolitis, pneumocolitis), up to severe consequences, such as ischemia, a rare occurrence. However, this event can occur both in vessels that supply intestine and in submucosa microvessels. We report drug-related intestinal vascular damage main characteristics, showing the radiological aspect of these alterations. Interpretation of imaging in oncologic patients has become progressively more complicated in the context of “target therapy” and thanks to the increasing number and types of therapies provided. Radiologists should know this variety of antiangiogenic treatments and immunotherapy regimens first because they can determine atypical features of tumor response and then also because of their eventual bowel toxicity.

Validation of an online application to identify potential immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on the patient’s symptoms

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly being used to treat malignancies. Some patients experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which may affect any organ/tissue. IrAEs are occasionally fatal and usually have nonspecific symptoms. We developed a three-step application (https://irae-search.com/) to provide healthcare professionals with information on the diagnosis, treatment options, and published reports for 38 categories of irAEs encountered in clinical practice.

Methods

IrAEs reported in ≥5 cases were identified from articles published between October 2018 and August 2020 by searching Japanese (SELIMIC, JAPIC-Q Service, and JMED Plus) and international (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Derwent Drug File) databases. The cases’ symptoms were entered into the application to identify irAEs, which were verified using the reported diagnosis, to evaluate the application’s sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Overall, 1209 cases (1067 reports) were analyzed. The three most common categories of irAEs were pituitary or adrenal disorders (14% of cases), skin disorders (13%), and diabetes mellitus (10%). The top three primary diseases were lung cancer (364 cases), melanoma (286 cases), and renal cell carcinoma (218 cases). The average sensitivity was 90.8% (range 44.4%–100.0%) initially, and improved to 94.8% (range 83.3%–100.0%) after incorporating the symptoms reported in published cases into the application’s logic for two irAE categories. The average specificity was 79.3% (range 59.1% [thyroid disorders]–98.2% [arthritis]).

Conclusion

irAE Search is an easy-to-use application designed to help healthcare professionals identify potential irAEs in ICI-treated patients in a timely manner to facilitate prompt management/treatment. The application showed high sensitivity and moderate-to-high specificity for detecting irAEs.

Optimal first-line treatment for platinum-eligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Comparison of chemo-immunotherapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy- A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of first-line of immunotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to explore an optimal first-line treatment strategy for mUC patients.

METHODS

We carried out a meta-analysis between chemo-immunotherapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy in mUC based on randomized trials. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). A fixed-effect or random-effects model was adopted depending on between-study heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Three trials involving 3238 patients were included. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with the improvements of OS (HR, 0.85; 95% CI 0.75-0.99), PFS (HR, 0.80; 95% CI 0.71-0.90) and ORR (OR, 1.32; 95% CI 1.07-1.63) when compared with platinum-based chemotherapy, but not with better DCR (OR, 1.07; 95% CI 0.78-1.46). PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone was associated with worse ORR (OR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.17-0.87) and DCR (OR, 0.20; 95% CI 0.16-0.25) when compared with platinum-based chemotherapy while it did not statistically reduce the risk of mortality (HR 0.97 for entire cohort; 0.90 for PD-L1 high cohort). In safety analyses, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) between regimens showed no difference, but the frequency of AEs of grade 3 or severity was higher in chemo-immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with platinum-based chemotherapy, chemo-immunotherapy is associated with significantly improved PFS, OS, and ORR in the first-line therapy for mUC at the expanse of increased toxicity.

Promise and Challenges of Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy in HIV

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a severe opportunistic infection that remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in people living with HIV (PLWH). Immune checkpoint molecules are negative regulators of the immune response that have been targeted as a strategy to bolster anti-viral immunity in PML, with varied outcomes reported. While initiation and optimization of antiretroviral therapy remains the standard of care in HIV-related PML, the specific opportunities and risks for checkpoint blockade in these cases should be explored.

RECENT FINDINGS

As of April 15, 2022, only 5 of the 53 total published cases of PML treated with checkpoint blockade had underlying HIV infection; four of these had a favorable outcome. The risk of promoting immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome is a major concern and underscores the importance of patient selection and monitoring. Checkpoint blockade warrants further exploration as a potentially promising option for treatment escalation in HIV-related PML.

Imaging evaluation of lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors

Immunotherapy (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors) has attracted attention for lung cancer treatment and recasted the administration of immunotherapeutics to patients who have advanced/metastatic diseases. Whether in combination or as monotherapy, these medications have become common therapies for certain patients with lung cancer. Moreover, their usage is expected to expand widely in the future. This review aims to discuss the imaging evaluation of lung cancer response to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy with focus on new radiological criteria for immunotherapy response. Abnormal radiological responses (pseudoprogression, dissociative responses, and hyperprogression) and immune-related adverse events are also described.

A case of cancer-associated hyponatraemia: primary adrenal insufficiency secondary to nivolumab

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is a new frontier for cancer treatment. On the safety profile, this drug class is associated with a new spectrum of side effects, the so-called immune-related adverse events that can potentially affect any organs, mainly endocrine glands. Scant data are available to inform the appropriate strategy of their management and treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 74-years man with squamous non-small cell lung cancer on nivolumab was hospitalized for fatigue, nausea, vomiting and severe hyponatremia. Biochemical tests were significant for hypotonic hyponatremia with a high urine sodium concentration. Endocrine tests showed overt primary hypothyroidism and low serum cortisol and aldosterone levels associated with an elevated circulating level of adrenocorticotrophic hormone. Adrenal antibody screening and the search of adrenal lesion on CT abdomen were negative. Thus, a nivolumab-induced primary adrenal insufficiency was diagnosed. Nivolumab withdrawal and replacement treatment with glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid allowed clinical and biochemical recovery.

CONCLUSION

Physicians need to be aware of potential immune-related adverse events in all patients treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Their timely recognition is essential to carry out the proper treatment.

Informing the new developments and future of cancer immunotherapy : Future of cancer immunotherapy

The application of cancer immunotherapy (CIT) in reinforcing anti-tumor immunity in response to carcinogenesis and metastasis has shown promising advances, along with new therapeutic challenges, in the landscape of cancer care. To promote tumor growth and metastasis, cancer cells aim to manipulate their microenvironment by mediating a crosstalk with various immune cells through the secretion of chemokines, cytokines, and other associated factors. Understanding this crosstalk is the key to discovering the best targets for improved immunotherapies and clinical strategies in cancer treatment. Here, we review the tumor immune crosstalk in cancer growth and metastasis. This review also highlights the development and expansion of CIT over the years. Moreover, we highlight clinical challenges and limitations involving immune-related adverse events, treating cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases, and the management of immunotherapy-induced treatment resistance. Possible clinical solutions to these current challenges in CIT are also proposed. Altogether, this review can contribute to the formation of pre-clinical and treatment-related strategies that further develop the availability and effectiveness of CIT.

Management of adverse events in cancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is associated with a spectrum of immune-related adverse events related to the mechanism of action which is quite different from that of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Adverse effects can affect multiple organs of the body and are most common in the skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and endocrine tissues, including the thyroid, adrenal gland, pituitary gland, as well as musculoskeletal, renal, nervous, hematologic, cardiovascular, and ocular systems. Any changes should be considered as being related to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Adverse events are very infrequent, but may be very serious and, even lethal, such as neurological disorders and myocarditis. When compared with standard chemotherapeutic agents, programmed death 1/programmed deathligand 1inhibitors are associated with a lower incidence of bone marrow suppression, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy can usually continue in the presence of mild immune-related adverse events with close monitoring. However, moderate to severe immune-related adverse events may be associated with a severe decline in organ function and quality of life, and may result in fatal outcomes. Hence, these toxicities require early detection and proper management. The management of immune-related adverse events usually involves corticosteroid therapy or the use of immunomodulators. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with preexisting autoimmune disease or a history of prior organ transplant should include careful consideration and a robust discussion of potential risks and benefits.

Immune Checkpoints Inhibitors and Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials

Simple Summary

On the basis of the efficacy and tolerable safety profiles of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) in second-line metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients, some emerging clinical trials focus on the first-line treatment. Thus, we conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess and compare the response and toxicity of ICIs in naïve-chemotherapy mUC setting. According to our results, combination therapy (either ICIs plus chemotherapy (CTX) or ICIs plus ICIs) had a higher priority in terms of overall survival. Concerning monotherapy, ICIs are not inferior to CTX in terms of OS. In view of the adverse effect, ICIs are very tolerable, and combination therapy did not lead to a higher incidence of grade 3–5 AEs when compared with CTX.

Abstract

Immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) were considered as second-line treatments in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) based on better survival benefit and safety profile than chemotherapy (CTX). We aimed to assess different ICIs regimens in the efficacy and safety for front-line treatments in mUC patients. A comprehensive literature search was performed and Phase II-III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ICIs for patients with mUC were included. The outcome was evaluated by overall survival (OS), progression of free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3–5 adverse events. Network meta-analysis was used to estimate the effect size. Surface under cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) were applied to rank the included treatments for each outcome. Results: The survival benefit of a single ICI was non-inferiority to chemotherapy (CTX). Although no superior effects were indicated, combination therapy (either ICIs plus CTX or ICIs plus ICIs) presented better OS compared with CTX alone. In terms of PFS, combination therapy produced a noticeable benefit over CTX. Regarding the SUCRA ranking, atezolizumab plus CTX was associated with the best ranking for OS and pembrolizumab plus CTX was the best in PFS. In terms of safety, a single ICI had better safety profile than CTX and combination therapy had a similar risk of grade 3–5 adverse events with CTX. Conclusions: Our NMA results revealed that combination therapy has better ranking compared with monotherapy in OS and acceptable AEs. ICIs alone present non-inferior OS but a lower incidence of AEs compared with CTX.

The role of opioids in cancer response to immunotherapy

Background

The response to immunotherapy can be impaired by several factors including external intervention such as drug interactions with immune system. We aimed to examine the immunomodulatory action of opioids, since immune cells express opioid receptors able to negatively influence their activities.

Methods

This observational, multicenter, retrospective study, recruited patients with different metastatic solid tumors, who have received immunotherapy between September 2014 and September 2019. Immunotherapy was administered according to the standard schedule approved for each primary tumor and line of treatment. The concomitant intake of antibiotics, antifungals, corticosteroids and opioids were evaluated in all included patients. The relationship between tumor response to immunotherapy and the oncological outcomes were evaluated. A multivariate Cox-proportional hazard model was used to identify independent prognostic factors for survival.

Results

One hundred ninety-three patients were recruited. Overall, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly shorter in those patients taking opioids than in those who didn’t (median PFS, 3 months vs. 19 months, HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.37–2.09, p < 0.0001; median OS, 4 months vs. 35 months, HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.26–2.02, p < 0.0001). In addition, PFS and OS were significantly impaired in those patients taking corticosteroids, antibiotics or antifungals, in those patients with an ECOG PS ≥ 1 and in patients with a high tumor burden. Using the multivariate analyses, opioids and ECOG PS were independent prognostic factors for PFS, whereas only ECOG PS resulted to be an independent prognostic factor for OS, with trend toward significance for opioids as well as tumor burden.

Discussion

Our study suggests that the concomitant administration of drugs as well as some clinical features could negatively predict the outcomes of cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. In particular, opioids use during immunotherapy is associated with early progression, potentially representing a predictive factor for PFS and negatively influencing OS as well.

Conclusions

A possible negative drug interaction able to impair the immune response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents has been highlighted. Our findings suggest the need to further explore the impact of opioids on immune system modulation and their role in restoring the response to immunotherapy treatment, thereby improving patients' outcomes.

Expression of the immune checkpoint molecule V-set immunoglobulin domain-containing 4 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent clinical studies on immune checkpoint (IC) inhibitors in the context of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) have failed to show significant survival benefits but have suggested the possible role of IC inhibitors in anti-AGC immunity. Considering the low efficacy of targeted drugs in AGC, there is an urgent need for the discovery of new targets for the development of immunotherapeutics and prognostic markers for patient selection. This study aimed to investigate the expression of a new IC molecule, V-set Ig domain-containing 4 (VSIG4), and its clinical significance in AGC and other major cancers.

METHODS

We analyzed the expression of VSIG4 and its correlation with survival in various carcinomas, including 882 surgically resected samples from patients with stage II-III AGC (two academic hospitals).

RESULTS

VSIG4 positivity in AGC was significantly associated with overall survival (OS; Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.661, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.012-3.519, P < 0.001) and event-free survival (HR = 2.8, 95% CI = 2.18-3.72, P < 0.001). These findings were successfully validated in independent cohorts. VSIG4 expression was also significantly correlated with low intratumoral CD8 + T-cell infiltration (CD8i) (P = 0.029) and high Foxp3 + /CD8i ratio (P = 0.026), which is consistent with the previously reported immunological function of VSIG4. However, VSIG4 expression was not associated with survival in other cancers (colon, P = 0.459; lung, P = 0.275; kidney, P = 0.121; breast, P = 0.147).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that VSIG4 is an independent prognostic factor in AGC and also implies that VSIG4 is a second-tier IC molecule in AGC, thus, providing an important basis for the development of gastric cancer-specific immunotherapeutics.

Incidence risk of PD-1/PD-L1-related pneumonia and diarrhea in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1(PD-L1) inhibitor therapy have been approved for the treatment of many cancers, although their incidence of some side effects was high. We aim to fully investigate the incidence risk of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors-related pneumonia and diarrhea in NSCLC patients, as well as treatment-related deaths.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Clinical trials.gov databases were searched up to Sep 17, 2020, for clinical trials of PD-1 inhibitors and PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC. Randomized controlled trials and their references were screened.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials were included in our meta-analysis, including 11,363 patients. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly increased the risk of developing all-grade and high-grade (grade ≥ 3) pneumonia (risk ratio [RR] = 2.28; 95% CI: 1.39-3.76; P < 0.01; RR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.72-3.29; P < 0.01, respectively). The use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor did not increase the risk of developing all-grade and high-grade diarrhea (RR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.62-1.01; P = 0.06; RR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.70-1.31; P = 0.78, respectively). There was no significant difference between the rate of death in PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors (P = 0.079).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly increase the risk of all-grade and high-grade pneumonia in NSCLC patients and PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy increases the risk of all-grade pneumonia in NSCLC patients compared to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination regimens. Physicians should pay more attention to NSCLC patients who treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and the spectrum of JC virus-related disease

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a devastating CNS infection caused by JC virus (JCV), a polyomavirus that commonly establishes persistent, asymptomatic infection in the general population. Emerging evidence that PML can be ameliorated with novel immunotherapeutic approaches calls for reassessment of PML pathophysiology and clinical course. PML results from JCV reactivation in the setting of impaired cellular immunity, and no antiviral therapies are available, so survival depends on reversal of the underlying immunosuppression. Antiretroviral therapies greatly reduce the risk of HIV-related PML, but many modern treatments for cancers, organ transplantation and chronic inflammatory disease cause immunosuppression that can be difficult to reverse. These treatments — most notably natalizumab for multiple sclerosis — have led to a surge of iatrogenic PML. The spectrum of presentations of JCV-related disease has evolved over time and may challenge current diagnostic criteria. Immunotherapeutic interventions, such as use of checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive T cell transfer, have shown promise but caution is needed in the management of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, an exuberant immune response that can contribute to morbidity and death. Many people who survive PML are left with neurological sequelae and some with persistent, low-level viral replication in the CNS. As the number of people who survive PML increases, this lack of viral clearance could create challenges in the subsequent management of some underlying diseases.

In this Review, Cortese et al. provide an overview of the pathobiology and evolving presentations of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and other diseases caused by JC virus, and discuss emerging immunotherapeutic approaches that could increase survival.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare, debilitating and often fatal disease of the CNS caused by JC virus (JCV).

JCV establishes asymptomatic, lifelong persistent or latent infection in immune competent hosts, but impairment of cellular immunity can lead to reactivation of JCV and PML.

PML most commonly occurs in patients with HIV infection or lymphoproliferative disease and in patients who are receiving natalizumab for treatment of multiple sclerosis.

The clinical phenotype of PML varies and is shaped primarily by the host immune response; changes in the treatment of underlying diseases associated with PML have changed phenotypes over time.

Other clinical manifestations of JCV infection have been described, including granule cell neuronopathy.

Survival of PML depends on reversal of the underlying immunosuppression; emerging immunotherapeutic strategies include use of checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive T cell transfer.

Current status and future perspectives of immunotherapy in bladder cancer treatment

The treatment strategy of bladder cancer has evolved not only through the traditional modalities of surgery and chemotherapy but also by immunotherapy over the past several decades. Immunotherapies such as intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccines and immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) are sometimes used for treating patients with bladder cancer, especially those who develop resistance to conventional first-line treatments such as surgery and chemotherapy. Unfortunately, it is a limited number of individuals that see clinical benefits from this approach, and complicating matters more is that many of these patients suffer severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). If current momentum continues to result in improved response rates and managed irAEs, immunotherapy could be poised to revolutionize the landscape of urothelial carcinoma therapeutics.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in women with gynecologic cancers: Practical considerations

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are an exciting new class of cancer therapeutics. Recently, a PD-1 inhibitor has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for several indications that are relevant to patients with gynecologic malignancies. In this review, we explore the clinical considerations for the use of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in this population. Specifically, we will discuss the approved indications, recommended dosing, clinical monitoring while on treatment, common adverse events, and treatment of adverse events should they arise. Additionally, we will review mechanisms of resistance and other challenges associated with the use of checkpoint inhibitors. We will conclude with a discussion of possible future directions for immunotherapy in women with gynecologic cancers.

New insights into small-cell lung cancer development and therapy

Small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 15% of lung cancer cases; however, it is characterized by easy relapse and low survival rate, leading to one of the most intractable diseases in clinical practice. Despite decades of basic and clinical research, little progress has been made in the management of SCLC. The current standard first‐line regimens of SCLC still remain to be cisplatin or carboplatin combined with etoposide, and the adverse events of chemotherapy are by no means negligible. Besides, the immunotherapy on SCLC is still in an early stage and novel studies are urgently needed. In this review, we describe SCLC development and current therapy, aiming at providing useful advices on basic research and clinical strategy.

The safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibody therapy in the treatment of previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: A meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

So far, anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibody therapy is reportedly in treating gastric cancer or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) in a number of clinical trials. Based on this, we conducted current meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibody for previously treated advanced GC/GEJC patients.

METHODS

We searched five electronic databases for eligible records. Outcomes were presented and analyzed by objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse effects (AEs).

RESULTS

Nine records involving 1388 participants were selected in our study. The pooled ORR, DCR, OS rate (6 month), PFS rate (6 month), OS rate (12 month) and PFS rate (12 month) were 10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6%-14%), 32% (95%CI: 25%-38%), 52% (95%CI: 44%-61%), 18% (95%CI: 13%-24%), 40% (95%CI: 31%-48%) and 8% (95%CI: 5%-10%), respectively. Meanwhile, grade≥3 AEs rate was 12% (95% CI: 10%-15%). Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive cases had higher rate of ORR (odds ratio [OR]: 3.75, 95%CI: 2.09-6.74, P=0.58) compared with negative cases.

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibody therapy has an effectual anti-tumor activity and controllable AEs in advanced GC/GEJC patients. Furthermore, overexpression of PD-L1 in advanced GC/GEJC patients had better ORR from anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibody therapy (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018116480).

Diagnosis, monitoring, and management of adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (icit) is now a standard of care for a variety of cancers in both the metastatic and adjuvant settings. As a result, an understanding of the timing, epidemiology, monitoring, diagnosis, and management of immune-related adverse events (iraes) associated with icit is imperative. This article reviews specific iraes by organ system, consolidating recommendations from multiple guidelines and incorporating data from case reports to highlight additional evolving therapeutic options for patients. Managing iraes requires early recognition, early intervention, and education of the patients and the multidisciplinary health care team alike. Given the durable responses observed with icit, and the irreversible nature of some of the iraes, further research into management of the sequelae of icit is required.

Causes of acute respiratory failure in the immunocompromised host

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A wide spectrum of heterogeneous conditions can render a patient immunocompromised. Recent years have seen an increase in the number of immunocompromised patients given the earlier detection of conditions that require immunosuppressive therapies, changes in immunosuppressive regimens leading to increased survival or novel therapeutic advancements in oncologic care. Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the leading cause of critical illness and mortality in this population. This review highlights the spectrum of causes of ARF in immunocompromised patients with a particular focus on acute toxicities of novel oncologic treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent years have seen improved survival amongst critically ill immunocompromised patients with ARF. This is likely attributable to patient selection of immunosuppressive therapy, improved noninvasive microbiologic diagnostic techniques, improved antimicrobial prophylaxis, treatment, stewardship, and advancements in supportive care including intensive care. Infectious complications remain the leading cause of ARF in this population. However, one of the greatest challenges physicians continue to face is accurate identification of the cause of ARF, given the vast (and increasing) noninfectious causes of ARF across these patients. Emerging therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T-cell) have contributed to this problem. Finally, undetermined ARF is reported in approximately 13% of immunocompromised and is associated with a worse prognosis.

SUMMARY

Infectious complications are still the leading cause of ARF in immunocompromised patients. However, noninfectious complications, derived from the underlying disease or treatment, should be always considered, including novel therapies, such as ICIs and CAR T cells. Further research should focus in improving the diagnostic rate in this subgroup.

Endocrine adverse events related to immune-oncology agents: retrospective experience of a single institution

Background

Immune-oncology agents (IOA) represent a turning point in the treatment of several solid tumors (ST). Although their toxicity compares favorably with other treatments, IOA associate immune-related adverse events (IR-AE), among which endocrine-related AE stand out. We retrospectively evaluated the occurrence of endocrine (E) IR-AE in a cohort of patients with several ST treated with IOA. In addition, we assessed the correlation between likelihood of survival and the occurrence of IR-AE.

Methods

We collected data on clinical and molecular characteristics, efficacy and AE of 260 patients with ST treated with IOA from 2013 to 2017. We excluded patients with prior conditions or treatments potentially affecting thyroid test results.

Results

Lung cancer was the most prevalent diagnosis (70.2%). EIR-AE appeared in 18.1% of patients (total of 38 EIR-AE) and consisted of hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, pituitary disorders and type 1 diabetes mellitus in 60.5%, 21.1%, 15.8% and 2.6% of patients, respectively. EIR-AE were associated mainly to nivolumab, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (41.2% and 26.5%) and appeared after a median of 4.2 cycles of treatment. Specific therapy was required in 65.8% patients. There were significant differences in both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients who experienced EIR-AE compared to those who did not [PFS: 56.7 (NC–NC) vs. 27.7 (14.3–41.3) months, P=0.008; OS: NC (NC–NC) vs. 31.4 (20.7–42.1) months, P=0.001].

Conclusions

The incidence of EIR-AE in our study is similar to other series. Patients who develop EIR-AE might have a better prognosis compared to those who do not experience them.

Exosomal PD-L1: New Insights Into Tumor Immune Escape Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies

As a classical immune checkpoint molecule, PD-L1 on the surface of tumor cells plays a pivotal role in tumor immunosuppression, primarily by inhibiting the antitumor activities of T cells by binding to its receptor PD-1. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have demonstrated unprecedented promise in treating various human cancers with impressive efficacy. However, a significant portion of cancer patients remains less responsive. Therefore, a better understanding of PD-L1-mediated immune escape is imperative. PD-L1 can be expressed on the surface of tumor cells, but it is also found to exist in extracellular forms, such as on exosomes. Recent studies have revealed the importance of exosomal PD-L1 (ExoPD-L1). As an alternative to membrane-bound PD-L1, ExoPD-L1 produced by tumor cells also plays an important regulatory role in the antitumor immune response. We review the recent remarkable findings on the biological functions of ExoPD-L1, including the inhibition of lymphocyte activities, migration to PD-L1-negative tumor cells and immune cells, induction of both local and systemic immunosuppression, and promotion of tumor growth. We also discuss the potential implications of ExoPD-L1 as a predictor for disease progression and treatment response, sensitive methods for detection of circulating ExoPD-L1, and the novel therapeutic strategies combining the inhibition of exosome biogenesis with PD-L1 blockade in the clinic.

Combination checkpoint inhibitor therapy induces multiple immune major related adverse events in the treatment of vaginal melanoma: A cautionary case report

•

As more ICIs are approved, better education is needed for patients and providers.

•

Major irAEs, signs of worsening immune toxicity, can present with benign symptoms.

•

IrAEs should be considered when patients on ICIs present with new symptoms.

•

Patients on ICIs may present to a variety of healthcare settings with irAEs.

•

Providers should be educated on basic work-up and treatment options for irAEs.

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) eliminate cancer cells through release of inhibition of cytotoxic CD8+ lymphocytes. Potent systemic activation of immune cells provides unprecedented efficacy in some types of advanced cancer therapy, but also often induces serious immune related adverse events (irAEs) that can be devastating if not promptly identified and properly managed. Herein, we describe the case of multiple major irAEs manifesting after administration of combination ICI therapy in a patient with vaginal melanoma.

Case:

A 54-year-old, G2P0 woman with recurrent metastatic vaginal melanoma, following three doses of combination nivolumab-ipilimumab immunotherapy, presented for admission at our tertiary care center for the work-up of sudden-onset of colitis of unknown etiology. Prior to admission at our facility, the patient was diagnosed with a severe maculopapular rash, headaches and hyponatremia in the weeks immediately following initiation of therapy. During work up of the colitis, infectious etiologies were ruled out, and the patient was discharged on a steroid taper for treatment of presumed immune-related colitis. Consideration of salt-supplement resistant hyponatremia with new onset frontal headache in the setting of immune-related colitis indicated possible hypophysitis. With high suspicion for multiple high grade irAEs, ICI was discontinued, and the patient was given high dose intravenous steroids prior to discharge with a prednisone dose taper for outpatient management. After control of irAEs was achieved, ipilimumab therapy was subsequently discontinued to minimize the chance of recurrent irAEs, yet nivolumab monotherapy was resumed in an attempt to control disease progression that could occur in with iatrogenic immunosuppression.

Conclusion

ICIs have demonstrated the ability to induce improved long-term survival in metastatic cutaneous or mucosal melanomas, including those of gynecologic origin. As ICI therapy becomes more widespread, healthcare providers across all fields of medicine need be vigilant to recognize the symptoms of irAEs that can often masquerade as common illnesses to prevent potentially dangerous irreversible immune toxicities.

Hierarchical assembly of hyaluronan coated albumin nanoparticles for pancreatic cancer chemoimmunotherapy

Pancreatic cancer is a highly malignant carcinoma with limited effective treatment options, resulting in a poor patient survival rate of less than 5%. In this study, cationic albumin nanoparticles were assembled with negatively charged hyaluronic acid (HA) to achieve a hierarchical nanostructure and efficient delivery of small molecule drugs to the tumor site in the pancreas. A combination of chemotherapy with indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) inhibition was explored to enhance the chemotherapeutic efficacy in vivo. Hydrophobic celastrol (CLT) and hydrophilic 1-methyltryptophan (MT) were concurrently loaded in HA coated cationic albumin nanoparticles (HNPs) with an average size of ∼300 nm. The size of HNPs was reduced in the presence of hyaluronidase to facilitate penetration into deep tumor tissues. Also, the biodistribution study in the C57BL/6 mice xenograft model showed enhanced tumor accumulation and prolonged circulation of HNPs. Compared with CLT solution, the combination of CLT with MT showed significantly enhanced tumor inhibition in both xenograft and orthotopic pancreatic cancer mice models via downregulating the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Taken together, the combination of CLT with MT administered via HNPs represents a highly promising strategy for targeted pancreatic cancer therapy.

Autoimmune rhabdomyolysis and a multiorgan display of PD-1 inhibitor induced immune related adverse events during treatment of metastatic melanoma

Background

Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors are among the immunotherapies that have revolutionized our approach to treating several cancers. These novel agents act by blocking PD-1 receptor/PD-1 ligand interactions that would otherwise allow tumor cells to evade host immune destruction by inhibiting response of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. They are overall well tolerated, though they have been associated with a constellation of immune mediated adverse events (irAEs).

Case presentation

We present a case of rare nivolumab mediated adverse events in a patient with nodular recurrence of melanoma. The patient presented with rhabdomyolysis and shortly thereafter developed a constellation of immune-mediated organ derangements. This case further demonstrates the utility and effectiveness of steroid therapy in the setting of irAEs despite our patient’s eventual poor clinical outcome. While PD-1 inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of several cancers, they require vigilance by the clinician for early detection and treatment of uncommon but potentially fatal irAEs.

Conclusions

PD-1 inhibitors are now widely used in a multitude of cancer types including melanoma, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma amongst others. While these agents are often well tolerated, they are associated with a unique profile of immune-related toxicities that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Education of both patients and healthcare providers is essential for diagnosis and treatment of these adverse events early in their course. This case highlights the uncommon but potentially serious PD-1-associated toxicity of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis along with other organ involvement and is directly applicable to use of these agents in patients with advanced cancers.

Delayed immune-related events (DIRE) after discontinuation of immunotherapy: diagnostic hazard of autoimmunity at a distance

BACKGROUND

The risk of delayed autoimmunity occurring months or years after discontinuation of immunotherapy is frequently asserted in the literature. However, specific cases were rarely described until 2018, when a wave of reports surfaced. With expanding I-O indications in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant curative setting, growing numbers of patients will receive limited courses of immunotherapy before entering routine surveillance. In this context, under-recognition of DIRE could pose a growing clinical hazard.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to characterize DIRE through identification of existing reports of delayed post-treatment irAE in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy. We performed a PubMed literature review from 2008 through 2018 to determine the median data safety reporting window from existing I-O clinical trials, which we then applied to define the DIRE cutoff, and collated all qualifying reports over the same time span. DIRE was defined as new immune-related adverse events (irAE) manifesting ≥90 days after discontinuation of immunotherapy.

RESULTS

Median duration of I-O clinical trials data safety reporting was 90 days (82% ≤ 90 days). DIRE cutoff was thus set as ≥90 days post-immunotherapy. We identified 23 qualifying cases; 21 by literature review and 2 from our institution. Median off-treatment interval to DIRE was 6 months (range: 3 to 28). Median cumulative immunotherapy exposure was 4 doses (range: 3 to 42). Involvement included endocrine, neurologic, GI, pulmonary, cardiac, rheumatologic and dermatologic irAE.

CONCLUSIONS

As immunotherapy indications expand into the curative setting, often with brief exposure and potentially sequenced with multimodality treatments, it will be necessary to recognize an emerging diagnostic complex, which we have termed delayed immune-related events (DIRE). Clinical vigilance has the potential to reduce morbidity from diagnostic delay, as irAE are generally manageable with prompt initiation of treatment - or from misdiagnosis - as misattribution can lead to unnecessary or harmful interventions as we describe. DIRE should therefore figure prominently in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with illnesses of unclear etiology, irrespective of intervening treatments or interval post-immunotherapy, both of which can confound diagnosis. Increased recognition will rest on delineation of DIRE as a clinical diagnostic entity.

Adverse Events of Oncologic Immunotherapy and Their Management

Over the past two decades, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for patients with cancer. However, newer versions of immunotherapy, such as checkpoint inhibitors, may be associated with unusual adverse effects (AEs) that can range in severity from mild to life-threatening. Unlike common AEs of conventional chemotherapy, which have a predictable nadir or cyclic pattern after administration, AEs of these newer immunotherapies are variable, depending on the type of immunotherapy, route of administration, and mechanism of action. The onset and resolution of these AEs may be present at any time, during administration of treatment, a few weeks after administration of treatment, or several months after completion of treatment. Therefore, improving outcomes in patients undergoing oncologic immunotherapy requires oncology nurses' knowledge and understanding of various immunotherapy agents, as well as early recognition and management of potential AEs, especially AEs associated with checkpoint inhibitors and other therapies that manipulate T-cell activation causing autoimmune toxicity. This article draws upon current evidence from systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert consensus guidelines to provide a brief overview of common immunotherapies used in cancer and management of their associated AEs.

Combining Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Established and Emerging Targets and Strategies to Improve Outcomes in Melanoma

The immune system employs several checkpoint pathways to regulate responses, maintain homeostasis and prevent self-reactivity and autoimmunity. Tumor cells can hijack these protective mechanisms to enable immune escape, cancer survival and proliferation. Blocking antibodies, designed to interfere with checkpoint molecules CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 and counteract these immune suppressive mechanisms, have shown significant success in promoting immune responses against cancer and can result in tumor regression in many patients. While inhibitors to CTLA-4 and the PD-1/PD-L1 axis are well-established for the clinical management of melanoma, many patients do not respond or develop resistance to these interventions. Concerted efforts have focused on combinations of approved therapies aiming to further augment positive outcomes and survival. While CTLA-4 and PD-1 are the most-extensively researched targets, results from pre-clinical studies and clinical trials indicate that novel agents, specific for checkpoints such as A2AR, LAG-3, IDO and others, may further contribute to the improvement of patient outcomes, most likely in combinations with anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1 blockade. This review discusses the rationale for, and results to date of, the development of inhibitory immune checkpoint blockade combination therapies in melanoma. The clinical potential of new pipeline therapeutics, and possible future therapy design and directions that hold promise to significantly improve clinical prognosis compared with monotherapy, are discussed.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis: A comprehensive review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that target down-regulators of the anti-cancer immune response: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, programmed cell death protein-1, and its ligand programmed death-ligand 1. ICIs have revolutionized the treatment of a variety of malignancies. However, many immune-related adverse events have also been described which mainly occurs as the immune system becomes less suppressed, affecting various organs including the gastrointestinal tract and causing diarrhea and colitis. The incidence of immune-mediated colitis (IMC) ranges from 1%-25% depending on the type of ICI and if used in combination. Endoscopically and histologically there is a significant overlap between IMC and inflammatory bowel disease, however more neutrophilic inflammation without chronic inflammation is usually present in IMC. Corticosteroids are recommended for grade 2 or more severe colitis while holding the immunotherapy. About one third to two thirds of patients are steroid refractory and benefit from infliximab. Recently vedolizumab has been found to be efficacious in steroid and infliximab refractory cases. While in grade 4 colitis, the immunotherapy is permanently discontinued, the decision is controversial in grade 3 colitis.

Hepatotoxicity induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a comprehensive review including current and alternative management strategies

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) block cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) receptors that control antitumor activities of lymphocytes. While highly efficacious, these drugs have been associated with several immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to the disruption of self-tolerance. Immune-mediated hepatitis (IMH) usually presents as mild elevations of liver enzymes though it can rarely be associated with life-threatening hepatic injury. Areas covered: A comprehensive review was performed to define the clinicopathologic forms of liver injury associated with ICIs, comparing the various ICI classes as well as comparing this form of IMH with idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis and drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis. Liver biopsy has proven very useful in selected patients. A specific form of fibrin ring granulomatous hepatitis appears to be associated with IMH. The current societal treatment algorithms and emerging data were reviewed to determine when to utilize corticosteroids. Expert opinion: Monitoring for severe ICI-IMH is recommended although acute liver failure remains rare. Most patients with grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity respond to corticosteroids, but a subset of patients with mild hepatitis on liver biopsy resolve without steroids and need to be carefully selected in concert with the consultation of a hepatologist.

Risk of immune-related adverse events associated with ipilimumab-plus-nivolumab and nivolumab therapy in cancer patients

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) among cancer patients receiving nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab therapy and nivolumab monotherapy.

Patients and methods

PubMed and Web of Science were searched for related studies from inception to June 2018. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials comparing nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab with nivolumab alone in cancer patients reporting on all-grade (grade 1-4) and high-grade (grade 3/4) irAEs. Paired reviewers selected studies for inclusion and extracted data. The odds risk and 95% CI were calculated.

Results

A total of 2,946 patients from four studies were included in the meta-analysis. The underlying malignancies included lung cancer (two trials) and melanoma (two trials). Compared with nivolumab monotherapy, the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab therapy was associated with a significantly higher risk of all- and high-grade irAEs such as pruritus, rash, diarrhea, colitis, alanine aminotransferase elevation, and pneumonitis.

Conclusion

The combination therapy of nivolumab and ipilimumab increased the incidence of irAEs in patients with advanced cancer.

The Relative Risk and Incidence of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Related Pneumonitis in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proved one of the most promising anti-cancer therapy, series clinical trials have confirmed their efficacy. But they are also associated with distinctive set of toxic effects, which are recognized as immune-related adverse events. Among those immune-related adverse events, pneumonitis is rare, but it is often clinically serious and potentially life-threatening. Although many clinical trial results of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors had been reported incidence of pneumonitis, the knowledge based on the individual cohort data from each clinical trial is limited. So we conducted a meta-analysis of trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced cancer and compared relative risk and incidence among different tumor types and therapeutic regimens. Such an analysis may provide important knowledge of this rare but clinically significant and potentially serious immune-related adverse event.

Methods: Electronic databases were used to search eligible literatures, include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immune checkpoint inhibitors vs. standard therapies. All-grade (1–4) or high-grade (3–4) pneumonitis events were extracted. The summary relative risk, summary incidence, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

Results: The incidence of all-grade and high-grade pneumonitis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was significantly higher compared with other tumor types, such as Melanoma, urothelial carcinoma (UC), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (3.1% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.02, 1.4% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.03). The risk of all-grade pneumonitis was obtained from all patients in both experimental arm and control arm. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1 did significantly increase the risk of all-grade and high-grade pneumonitis compared with controls (fixed effects, RR: 4.70; 95% CI: 2.81–7.85; p < 0.00001, RR: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.68–6.59; p = 0.0006).

Conclusion: The incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitors related pneumonitis was higher in NSCLC than other tumor types. Patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor in experiment arms are more likely to experience any grade pneumonitis than control arms. These findings suggest that clinician need to draw more attention on this rare but serious adverse event.

Effectiveness and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA4 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for lung cancer: A meta-analysis

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy have been applied as a first-line treatment for lung cancer, but consistent beneficial results have not been documented. Therefore, our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy to promote its application.

Methods

We searched electronic databases for studies that estimated the safety and efficacy of combined therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control response (DCR) parameters were evaluated with odds ratio (OR) values of the combination arm over the non-combination arm. Hazard ratios (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the combination and non-combination arms. All treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 3 to 5 TRAEs were expressed as relative risk (RR) values of the combination arm over the non-combination arm.

Results

Ten eligible studies involving 4,887 patients were identified. The pooled ORs for ORR and DCR were 1.85 (95% CI: 1.30-2.63, P<0.01) and 1.14 (95% CI: 0.70-1.86, P<0.01), respectively. The pooled HRs for PFS and OS were 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58-0.79, P<0.001) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.88, P<0.001), respectively. In subgroup analysis, ORR and DCR were significantly improved in the programmed cell death-1/L1 (PD-1/L1) blockade for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) group (subgroup A), with a combined OR values of 2.36 (95% CI: 1.79-3.13, P<0.001) and 1.92 (95% CI: 1.10-3.35, P<0.001), respectively. However, no significant benefits were observed in the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) blockade for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (subgroup B) and CTLA-4 blockade for NSCLC groups (subgroup C). In addition, a significant improvement in PFS was observed in subgroup A, subgroup B and subgroup C, with pooled HR values of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63, P<0.001), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76-0.97, P<0.05) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.68-1.00, P<0.05), respectively. Only subgroup A exhibited an OS benefit, with a combined HR value of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.55-0.81, P<0.001). Moreover, as the expression of PD-L1 increased, the PFS and OS benefits were more significantly. Furthermore, patients without central nervous system (CNS) metastasis who were treated with PD-1/L1 inhibitors had a longer OS than patients with CNS metastasis (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55-0.80, P<0.001). Finally, combined therapy was associated with 3 to 5 TRAEs (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08-1.47; P<0.01).

Conclusions

Patients treated with immunotherapy and chemotherapy in combination exhibited superior in ORR, DCR, PFS and OS as well as slightly increased TRAE levels compared with those of patients treated with either monotherapy.

Possible immune adverse events as predictors of durable response to BRAF inhibitors in patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma

BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitors (MEKi) are among the cornerstones of metastatic melanoma therapy demonstrating excellent response rates with duration of 7-12 m. Long-term benefit from these agents was reported in patients with normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and less than three disease sites. However, a treatment-dependent marker for long-term efficacy is lacking. Data suggest that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are associated with clinical benefit in patients treated with immunotherapy and that response to BRAF/MEK therapy may have an underlying immune mechanism. We hypothesised that AEs with an underlying immune mechanism may be associated with a durable response to targeted therapy. We retrospectively identified a cohort of 78 BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma patients treated with BRAFi or BRAFi + MEKi between November 2010 and November 2013. Four treatment-related AEs including vitiligo, uveitis, erythema nodosum and keratitis sicca were defined as irAEs of interest. Retrospective analysis of AEs in relationship to progression-free survival (PFS), disease burden and LDH levels was performed. Median PFS (mPFS) for all patients was 7.5 months with responses ongoing in eight patients as of April 2017. Ten patients were identified with the AEs defined previously. Cox regression analysis revealed a very strong association between those AEs and PFS; mPFS was 42.8 m in patients with at least one AE versus 6.1 m in those without an AE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.22, p = 0.002). This association was independent of LDH levels and disease burden (HR 0.24, p = 0.035). This analysis demonstrates a strong association between immune AEs and durable response to targeted therapy and may provide a treatment-related biomarker to estimate the outcome of therapy.

The role of radiology in the evaluation of the immunotherapy efficacy

In the last years, a great interest has arisen on immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Check-point inhibitor drugs are now considered clinical practice standard in different settings and their use is expected to increase significantly in the near future. As treatment options for lung cancer advance and vary, the different patterns of radiological response increase in number and heterogeneity. To correctly evaluate the radiological findings after and during these treatments is of paramount importance, both in the clinical and sperimental setting. In consideration of their peculiar mechanism, immunotherapies can determine unusual response patterns on imaging, that cannot be correctly evaluated with the traditional response criteria such as World Health Organization (WHO) and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST). Therefore, during these years, several response criteria [immune-related response criteria (irRC), irRECIST and iRECIST] were proposed and applied in clinical trials on immunotherapies. The aim of this review is to describe the radiological findings after immunotherapy, to critically discuss the different response criteria and the imaging of immune-related adverse events.