Recent advances in medical therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer

Real-world epidemiology and treatment patterns of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Retrospective analysis of Diagnosis Procedure Combination claims data in Japan

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate real-world epidemiologic trends and treatment patterns in newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) in Japan.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included adults with newly diagnosed la/mUC in Japan (January 2015-December 2019) from a nationwide-linked electronic medical record Diagnostic Procedure Combination claims dataset. Outcomes included epidemiologic trends (incidence and prevalence), baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns in newly diagnosed patients with la/mUC before (2015-2017) and after (2018-2019) approval of pembrolizumab in Japan.

RESULTS

Of 975 patients included, 76.4% were men; 71.6% were aged 70 years or older. Most cases (70.5%) were of the bladder. Between 2015 and 2019, the annual age-adjusted incidence increased from 6.8 to 12.4 per 100 000; the annual age-adjusted period prevalence increased from 13.0 to 25.2 per 100 000; and 307 (31.5%) and 668 (68.5%) patients were diagnosed from 2015 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019, respectively. Overall, 731 (75%) patients received systemic anticancer therapy; all received 1 line and 50.2% received 2 lines of therapy; 78.3% of patients received gemcitabine plus platinum-based therapy and 2.2% received pembrolizumab as first-line treatment. First-line treatment rates increased from 69.4% to 77.5% after pembrolizumab approval. Of 367 patients who received second-line treatment, 22.3% received gemcitabine plus platinum-based therapy; 14.7% received pembrolizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

In the Japanese regions considered, incidence and prevalence of newly diagnosed la/mUC increased over time and first-line treatment with pembrolizumab increased after approval.

Occult urothelial carcinoma with mediastinal metastasis: A case report

Occult urothelial carcinoma (UC), particularly with mediastinal metastases, is an uncommon clinical occurrence. The present study describes the unusual case of a 70-year-old male patient who developed mediastinal metastases from an occult UC. Histological evaluations and immunohistochemical features of the mediastinal tumor were indicative of UC; however, extensive imaging failed to identify the primary urological lesion. The findings suggest that mediastinal metastases from UCs, despite their rarity, should be considered in cases where patients with mediastinal tumors exhibit chest-related symptoms. Prompt pathological examinations are crucial for ascertaining the nature and origin of the tumor. Moreover, individualized treatment should be performed in strict accordance with the established oncology guidelines.

Treatment patterns in metastatic bladder cancer in Japan: results of the CancerMPact® survey 2020

Aim: To assess physician-reported treatment of metastatic bladder cancer in Japan. Methods: 76 physicians completed the CancerMPact® survey in July 2020, considering patients treated within 6 months. Results: Physicians treated a mean of 38.1 patients per month. Of cisplatin-eligible and -ineligible patients, 97.6 and 89.3%, respectively, received first-line platinum-based therapy, most commonly cisplatin plus gemcitabine (72.9%) and carboplatin plus gemcitabine (59.7%). 1.6 and 5.6% received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors, respectively. 48.4 and 45.0%, respectively, progressed and received second-line therapy, most commonly with pembrolizumab (61.7%). Conclusion: In 2020, most patients with metastatic bladder cancer in Japan received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy; however, >50% received no subsequent treatment, highlighting the need for new treatment regimens to improve outcomes and maximize first-line treatment benefits.

Tumor immune microenvironment and clinical outcomes in stage IV urothelial cancer: YODO study

BACKGROUND

Bladder cancer is the 10th most common cancer globally, with a growing incidence in Japan. Evaluation of molecular, genetic, and cellular biomarkers that predict treatment response and prognosis in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) may help optimize sequential treatment strategies with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective cohort study, evaluated programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and cancer-immune phenotype as predictive prognostic biomarkers following first-/second-line treatment in Japanese adult patients with mUC. The primary endpoint was prevalence of PD-L1 expression. Secondary endpoints were TMB, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) from initiation of first-line treatment, and exploratory endpoints were cancer-immune phenotype, OS, PFS, and treatment response according to potential biomarker status.

RESULTS

Of the 143 patients included (mean age 71.7 years), PD-L1 expression was high in 29.4% of patients. Non-synonymous TMB was high in 33.6% and low in 66.4%. Cancer-immune phenotype was immune-desert in 62.9%, immune-excluded in 30.8%, and inflamed in 6.3%. Median OS and PFS following first-line treatment were 18.2 and 7.4 months, respectively. Overall response to second-line treatment was slightly better with high versus low/negative PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression and TMB were non-significant predictors of OS or PFS, whereas immune-excluded phenotype was associated with better OS in comparison with immune-desert phenotype.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression and TMB were non-significant predictors of prognosis after first-line treatment in Japanese patients with mUC, but cancer-immune phenotype may be an important prognostic factor in chemotherapy-ICI sequential treatment strategies. Clinical trial registration number UMIN000037727.

A case of sequential medical therapy for advanced ureteral cancer in Li-Fraumeni syndrome

Introduction

Li-Fraumeni syndrome, an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome caused by a pathogenic variant of TP53, a tumor suppressor gene, leads to a high risk from early childhood of developing various types of cancers. Here, we report a case of advanced ureteral cancer in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Case presentation

A 73 years-old female patient, who had been diagnosed genetically as Li-Fraumeni syndrome; suffered from chondrosarcoma in the left pelvic joint, bilateral breast cancer, endometrial cancer, gastric cancer, and colon cancer in her history. She was diagnosed as unresectable advanced urothelial cancer during continuous magnetic resonance imaging surveillance, underwent avelumab maintenance therapy after the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy. The efficacies of gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy and avelumab maintenance therapy were good.

Conclusion

We report an advanced urothelial cancer in a patient with Li-Fraumeni syndrome who demonstrated good efficacies to sequential medical therapy.

Significance of second progression-free survival in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who received platinum-based combination chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab

OBJECTIVES

The present study comprehensively investigated the significance of several factors reflecting the therapeutic effects of anticancer treatment on overall survival (OS) in advanced urothelial cancer (UC) patients receiving sequential systemic therapy.

METHODS

This study included 101 consecutive advanced UC patients who received first-line platinum-based combination chemotherapy followed by second-line pembrolizumab. The impacts of the following factors on OS in these patients were analyzed: responses to chemotherapy, responses to pembrolizumab, progression-free survival (PFS) with chemotherapy, PFS with pembrolizumab, and second PFS (PFS2).

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 71 years, and 35 and 66 had UC in the upper urinary tract and bladder, respectively. objective response rate to first-line chemotherapy and second-line pembrolizumab were 37.6% and 19.8%, respectively. Median PFS with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab, and PFS2 were 5, 4, and 9 months, respectively. Uni- and multivariate analyses of the five factors examined identified PFS with pembrolizumab and PFS2 as independent surrogates for OS, with PFS2 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.23) being more closely associated with OS than PFS with pembrolizumab (HR = 0.31). Furthermore, uni- and multivariate analyses of various prognostic parameters showed the independent impacts of baseline performance status (PS) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on PFS2.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest the potential of PFS2 as an optimal surrogate for OS in advanced UC patients receiving standard sequential systemic therapy and indicate that intensive treatment needs to be considered for those with poor PS and/or high NLR prior to the introduction of first-line chemotherapy.

Safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma: a nation-wide post-marketing surveillance

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to identify factors associated with the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma and to confirm the real-world safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients.

METHODS

This multicenter, observational, post-marketing surveillance was conducted over a 1-year observation period starting at pembrolizumab initiation (200-mg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks); data were collected from case report forms (3 months and 1 year). Safety measures included treatment-related adverse events and adverse events of special interest (AEOSI). Effectiveness assessments included tumor response, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR).

RESULTS

Overall, 1293 patients were evaluated for safety and 1136 for effectiveness. At 12 months, the treatment-related adverse event incidence was 53.8% (n = 696) and that of AEOSI was 25.0% (n = 323). The most frequent AEOSI of any grade were endocrinological disorder (10.4%, n = 134), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (7.2%, n = 93), and hepatic function disorder (4.9%, n = 64). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the risk of developing ILD was almost seven times greater (odds ratio 6.60) in patients with a comorbidity of ILD, and approximately twice as high in patients aged ≥ 65 years (odds ratio 2.24) and with smoking history (odds ratio 1.79). The ORR was 26.1% and the DCR was 50.7%. The ORR was 46.4% in patients with a Bellmunt risk score of 0 and decreased as the Bellmunt risk score increased.

CONCLUSIONS

This post-marketing surveillance confirmed the safety and effectiveness of pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with unresectable urothelial carcinoma in the real-world setting.

Probiotics enhances anti-tumor immune response induced by gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy for urothelial cancer

Chemotherapy drugs, such as gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC), are frequently administered to patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, however the influence of the gut microbiota on their action is unclear. Thus, we investigated the effects of GC on the gut microbiome and determined whether oral supplementation with a probiotics mixture of Lactobacillus casei Shirota and Bifidobacterium breve enhanced the anti-tumor immune response. After subcutaneous inoculation with MBT2 murine bladder cancer cells, syngenic C3H mice were randomly allocated into eight groups. The gut microbiome cluster pattern was altered in both the GC and oral probiotics groups (p = 0.025). Both tumor-bearing conditions (no treatment) and GC chemotherapy influenced Pseudoclostridium, Robinsoniella, Merdimonas, and Phocea in the gut. Furthermore, comparison of the GC-treated and GC + probiotics groups revealed an association of four methyltransferase family enzymes and two short-change fatty acid-related enzymes with oral probiotics use. A significant difference in tumor volume was observed between the GC and GC + probiotics groups at week 2 of treatment. Additionally, decreased recruitment of cancer-associated fibroblasts and regulatory T cells, and activation of CD8⁺ T cells and dendritic cells were observed in the tumor microenvironment. Our findings reveal the positive effects of a probiotics mixture of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in enhancing anti-tumor effects through the gut-tumor immune response axis. Future clinical trials are needed to evaluate the full benefits of this novel supplement with oral probiotics in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Precision Medicine in the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: New Molecular Targets and Pharmacological Therapies

Simple Summary

Therapeutic breakthroughs in urothelial carcinoma have been occurring rapidly over the past 10 years. However, the resistance and prognosis of this disease is always quite a difficult health challenge. Trying to understand the new therapeutic perspectives is a priority to try to bring in new drug models that can counteract the advancing prognosis and inauspicious diagnosis.

Abstract

Many variants of urothelial cancer present diagnostic challenges and carry clinical implications that influence prognosis and treatment decisions. The critical issues of treatment-resistant clones are a crucial barrier to care in individuals affected by urothelial carcinoma. Laying the foundations for the resistance evolution, a wide mutational heterogeneity characterizes urothelial carcinoma, noticeable also in patients affected by a early stage disease. In recent years the growing knowledge of the pathogenesis and molecular paths underlying the onset and progression of urothelial cancer are leading to the development of new therapies based on immune checkpoints. Chemotherapy and immunotherapy both operate selectively by shaping the developmental trajectory of urothelial carcinoma in the course of the illness. To date, a promising new therapeutic treatment is represented by antibody-drug conjugates, therapeutic tools that exploit the targeted ability of an antibody to administer cytotoxic drugs directly to the tumor. Indeed, nowadays in the clinical setting there are several treatments available for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer, from classic chemotherapeutics such as Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Carboplatin, Paclitaxel and Docetaxel, to Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors such as Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, up to anti-nectin 4 Enfortumab Vedotin and Sacituzumab govitecan, which binds Tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (Trop-2) and activates as a topoisomerase inhibitor. The aim of this work is to describe the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset of the urothelial cancer and provide an overview of the immunotherapies that can be used in the clinical setting to counteract it, deepening the efficacy and safety results of the pivotal studies and the place in therapy of these treatments.

Are there differences in the characteristics of patients who respond to gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy and those who respond to pembrolizumab therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma? Multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate factors to predict overall survival of metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy or pembrolizumab therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated two metastatic urothelial carcinoma cohorts treated with (i) gemcitabine plus cisplatin or (ii) pembrolizumab. The gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort was treated from December 2005 through December 2014 while the pembrolizumab cohort was treated from January 2018 through December 2020. Using multivariate analyses, we evaluated the risk factors for overall survival in each cohort and compared them. None of the gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort patients were treated with pembrolizumab. All patients in the pembrolizumab cohort were treated with prior platinum-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

There were 184 patients in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort and 91 in the pembrolizumab cohort. The mean follow-up periods were 714 and 284 days, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for overall survival in the gemcitabine plus cisplatin cohort were liver metastasis, worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (1 or more), no primary site resection, and a high prognostic index (1 or more). In the pembrolizumab cohort, liver metastasis, bone metastasis, and worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status (1 or more), and high prognostic index (1 or more) were the risk factors for overall survival. In the pembrolizumab cohort, patients with a complete response or partial response during prior platinum-based chemotherapy had better overall survival with the following pembrolizumab treatment than those with stable or progressive disease (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the similarity of these risk factors in two sequential treatments, it may be possible to predict the response to pembrolizumab according to the response to prior chemotherapy.

Recent Advances in Medical Therapy for Urological Cancers

The mainstay of medical treatment has been tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for renal cell cancer (RCC), cytotoxic chemotherapy for urothelial cancer (UC), and androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. These therapeutic modalities still play important roles in these malignancies. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that target PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 are being rapidly introduced for the treatment of metastatic urological cancers, just as they have been for other malignancies. Currently, the paradigm of medical treatment for patients with metastatic urological cancer is dramatically changing. Accordingly, we need to organize and summarize the new therapeutic tools, which include immune checkpoint inhibitors, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). This review provides an overview of agents and regimens that have just launched or will be launched in the near future in Japan. Based on the promising anti-tumor efficacy and manageable safety profiles being demonstrated in clinical trials, these new agents and therapies are expected to be rapidly introduced in Japanese clinical practice. Additionally, the newly designed ADC, enfortumab vedotin, which comprises a fully human monoclonal antibody conjugated to an anti-cancerous agent via a protease-cleavable linker, has just been launched in Japan. In order to provide the optimal treatment for our patients, we need to completely understand these new therapeutic tools.

Chronological transition in outcome of second-line treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer after pembrolizumab approval: a multicenter retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

After first-line chemotherapy failure, metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients undergo pembrolizumab (PEM) or gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD) therapy. We retrospectively investigated outcomes of second-line GD or PEM for mUC patients.

METHODS

A total of 198 mUC patients from Nagoya City University and affiliated hospitals who received second-line treatment were grouped according to immune check point inhibitor (ICI) availability: Groups A (pre-ICI: n = 104) and B (post-ICI: n = 94). We compared clinical outcomes using Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses assessed potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Median OS was significantly longer for Group B [median 13.6 months, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.6-17.6] than A (7.6 months, 5.3-8.8). By sub-group analysis, patients received no additional treatment (Naïve, n = 70), or PEM or GD (Salvage, n = 24) in Group B, with median OS of Naïve and A groups similar. Compared to the Salvage group, significant differences in OS were observed (median 7.6 months, 95% CI 5.3-8.8; Group A, 7.6 months, 4.7-13.8; Naïve, 25.7 months, 14.0-31.0; p < 0.01). For the Salvage group, OS for sequential treatment of GD-salvage PEM and PEM-salvage GD patients was similar (p = 0.10). Multivariate analysis showed a low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and high geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) as significant prognostic factors affecting long OS [95% CI 1.12-3.45, hazard ratio (HR): 1.97; 95% CI 0.24-0.71, 0.41, respectively].

CONCLUSION

Second-line GD or PEM therapy for mUC patients showed equivalent survival benefits. GNRI and NLR are prognostic biomarkers for survival outcome.

Pembrolizumab Versus Combined Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel: A Comparative Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Platinum-refractory Advanced Urothelial Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

There are limited data on comprehensive assessments of several treatments as second-line therapy against advanced urothelial cancer (UC). The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between advanced UC patients receiving either pembrolizumab (Pem) or combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine and paclitaxel (GP) as second-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 89 patients with platinum-refractory advanced UC, consisting of 46 and 43 who received Pem and GP therapy, respectively, as second-line treatment.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in major clinicopathological parameters between Pem and GP groups. No significant difference in the objective response rate was noted between the two groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) in the Pem group was significantly longer than that in the GP group; however, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between them. Multivariate analyses identified performance status ≤2 and liver metastasis as independent factors associated with poor outcomes in both PFS and OS. The incidence of adverse events in the GP group was significantly higher than that in the Pem group.

CONCLUSION

Pem could be regarded as standard agent for platinum-refractory advanced UC patients.

Clinical benefit of continuing pembrolizumab treatment beyond progression in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There has been no clinical evidence to justify continued pembrolizumab therapy beyond progression in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study evaluating the clinical efficacy of continued use of pembrolizumab beyond progression in patients with metastatic UC. Data from 51 patients with metastatic UC, who developed progression during second-line pembrolizumab therapy, were analyzed. Progression was defined based on the Immunotherapy Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The outcome was overall survival (OS). The association between continued treatment, OS, and the risk of all-cause mortality was tested using log-rank test, conventional and time-dependent Cox regression models.

RESULTS

No significant difference in patient characteristics was noted between patients continuing pembrolizumab beyond progression (N = 21) and those discontinuing pembrolizumab (N = 30). Median OS was significantly longer in the continuation group (17.8 vs. 8.8 months; P = 0.038). A multivariable conventional Cox regression model identified continued pembrolizumab administration as a significant independent prognostic factor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.90, P = 0.036), irrespective of the time from treatment initiation to progression and concurrent clinical progression. Further, longer duration of pembrolizumab treatment beyond progression was independently associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in a multivariable time-dependent Cox regression model, when used as a time-dependent variable (HR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.45, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Continued pembrolizumab administration beyond progression might be beneficial in patients with metastatic UC who were clinically stable.

Effectiveness and safety profile of pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial cancer: A retrospective single-center analysis in Japan

BACKGROUND

The paradigm of medical treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma is dramatically changing through the introduction of pembrolizumab.

AIM

We investigated the treatment effectiveness, the safety profile, and the prognostic factors of pembrolizumab in Japanese real-world clinical practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The medical records of 74 consecutive Japanese patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (UC), who started pembrolizumab as a second- or later-line treatment at our institution between January 2018 and March 2020, were reviewed and statistically analyzed. The median follow-up period after initiation of pembrolizumab was 8.5 (interquartile range: 3.5-15.7) months. The objective response rate was 30.2%, the median progression-free survival period was 4.9 months, and the median overall survival (OS) period was 13.3 months. Evaluation revealed that 39 (52.9%) patients experienced adverse events (AEs), among whom eight patients (10.9%) had severe AEs (grade 3 or more), including grade 5 hemophagocytic syndrome. Multivariate analysis indicated that the presence of liver metastasis, worse performance status (≥2), elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, and increased C-reactive protein were predictive of shorter OS.

CONCLUSION

We studied the effectiveness and safety profile of pembrolizumab therapy in Japanese UC patients. We believe that the data presented here will be useful for clinical physicians.

Rectal metastasis from bladder urothelial carcinoma: a case report

Background

Urothelial carcinoma arises from transitional cells in the urothelial tract. In advanced cases, it can metastasize locally to surrounding organs or distally to organs such as the lungs, bones, or liver. Here we describe a case of rectal metastasis from urothelial carcinoma treated with multiple sessions of transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT).

Case presentation

A 72-year-old woman presented to our department with abdominal bloating andobstructed defecation. She had undergone two sessions of TURBT for early urothelial carcinoma in another hospital at 64 and 65 months ago, respectively. Cystoscopy at 3 months after the second TURBT session had indicated disease recurrence, and thus, she had been referred to our hospital for further examination, followed by TURBT for the third time at 59 months ago and for the fourth time at 48 months ago; thereafter, she had been followed up with cystoscopy every 6 months without any recurrence. However, she returned to our hospital, complaining of difficult defecation. Subsequent colonoscopy demonstrated an obstructive tumor in the rectum, which was pathologically diagnosed as metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Laparoscopic examination revealed two small areas of peritoneal dissemination in the pelvis. A sigmoid colostomy was performed without rectal tumor resection. She has been receiving chemotherapy and is still alive 10 months after surgery.

Conclusions

Rectal metastasis is a rare site of metastasis for urothelial carcinomas. It is important to consider the possibility of annular rectal constriction caused by infiltrating or metastasizing urothelial carcinoma when managing patients with urothelial carcinoma and with difficult defecation.

The effect of number of treatment cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy on maximum radiological response in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The number of cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy associated with the maximum tumor response in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma is not yet established. We investigated the association between the number of cycles and the maximum radiological response of first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 167 patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy between May 2003 and December 2020. The primary outcome was estimating the number of cycles associated with the maximum radiological response and progression disease rate within the 6 cycles. The radiological response was evaluated by the RECIST v1.1. The secondary outcomes included the difference in radiological response rate and the impact on overall survival between the cisplatin-based and carboplatin-based regimens.

RESULTS

The maximum radiological response was -22% at Cycles 2. It was significantly decreased at Cycles 4 (-15%) compared with Cycles 2 (P < 0.001). The progression disease rate within the first 2, 4, and 6 cycles were 21% and 63%, and 84%, respectively. Radiological response was no significant difference between the cisplatin-based and carboplatin-based regimens. However, it was significantly decreased in the carboplatin-based regimen at Cycles 4 (-17%) compared with Cycles 2 (-22%; P = 0.004). Background-adjusted overall survival was not significantly different in between the cisplatin-based and carboplatin-based regimens (hazard rate 1.27; P = 0.337).

CONCLUSION

The maximum radiological response was -22% at Cycles 2. The radiological response was significantly different between Cycle 2 and 4. More than half of patients had disease progression within the first 4 cycles.

Paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy after platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma

Pembrolizumab has been available for the treatment of radical resectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) when it is exacerbated after chemotherapy since December 2017 in Japan. However, the efficacy of chemotherapy for cases progressing after pembrolizumab is unclear. The present study compared the outcomes and toxicities in patients with metastatic UC after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab, who were selected to receive paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) chemotherapy, with those in patients who received the best supportive care (BSC). A total of 36 patients received pembrolizumab for metastatic UC at four institutions between January 2018 and August 2019. Of the 21 patients who progressed after pembrolizumab, 7 received TC chemotherapy (TC group) and 14 selected BSC (BSC group). The median observation period was 4.1 months. The 7 aforementioned patients who received TC chemotherapy (4 male and 3 female; median age, 62 years; range, 57-79 years) were analyzed in the present study. The ECOG performance status was 0 in three patients, 1 in one patient, 2 in two patients and 3 in one patient. Two patients had upper urinary tract UC, two had bladder UC and three had both types of UC. Six patients had visceral metastasis. The number of chemotherapy regimens before pembrolizumab was one in four patients, two in two patients and three in one patient. The objective response rate was 28.6% (partial response, 2 patients; stable disease, 4 patients; progressive disease, 1 patient), the median progression-free survival time was 3.4 months and the median overall survival time was 10.9 months (vs. 2.7 months in BSC group; P=0.0156). Although grade ≥3 adverse events developed in five patients, there were no treatment-associated deaths. The present results suggested that TC chemotherapy may be a preferred option for patients who require aggressive treatment after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and pembrolizumab.

Organ-Specific Tumor Response to Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma After Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

Background

To evaluate the organ-specific therapeutic effect of pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC).

Materials and Methods

Patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and who had measurable disease were retrospectively analyzed. The objective response rate (ORR) and organ-specific response rate (OSRR) were evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.

Results

We analyzed 69 patients (male, n=51; median age, 71 years) with 226 metastases. The ORR was 23.2%. In total, 32, 31, 16, 14, 13 and 7 patients had measurable lung (OSSR 31.3%), lymph node (OSSR 29.0%), local recurrence (OSSR 12.5%), primary tumor organ (OSSR 7.1%), liver (OSSR 23.1%) and bone (OSSR 28.6%) disease, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) for pembrolizumab was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval, 5.9‑13.7 months). Regarding organ-specific OS, a Log rank test significant differences in OS were confirmed between patients with and without primary tumor organ disease (p=0.046) and liver metastasis (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Metastases and primary tumor organ disease showed different tumor responses to pembrolizumab. The most prominent tumor response was found in lung metastasis and the least response was found in primary organ sites. The mechanisms of these different responses were unclear and there does not appear to be a constant trend between tumor shrinkage and OS in tumor sites. Further studies are needed.

Treating Japanese Patients With Pembrolizumab for Platinum-Refractory Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in Real-World Clinical Practice

Background

Since December 2017, pembrolizumab has been approved in Japan as a second-line treatment for radical unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) that has become exacerbated after chemotherapy by the international randomized phase 3 trial, KEYNOTE-045. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncological efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy in Japanese patients with advanced UC in real-world clinical practice.

Methods

A total of 34 patients who received pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma at four institutions between January 2018 and August 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. In all patients, UC was histopathologically diagnosed, and disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy was radiologically confirmed.

Results

The median follow-up period was 7.7 months. The objective response rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 20.6%, 3.3 months, and 11.7 months, respectively. Regarding the toxicities associated with pembrolizumab, adverse events (AEs) of any grade occurred in 61.8%, and grade 3 AEs occurred in 23.5%; grade ≥ 4 AEs did not occur in any patients. Univariate analyses revealed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, liver metastases, and time from previous chemotherapy were prognostic variables. Multivariate analyses revealed that liver metastases (positive: hazard ratio, 4.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.48 - 12.08; P < 0.01) and time from previous chemotherapy (≥ 3 months: hazard ratio, 5.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.43 - 17.91; P = 0.01) were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

In this real-world clinical study, these findings concerning the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for advanced UC in Japanese patients were comparable to those of the open-label, international, phase 3 trial KEYNOTE-045. Liver metastases and time from previous chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors in the present study.

Timing of changing therapy from gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy based on real-world data of advanced urothelial carcinoma

Cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy is the gold-standard approach for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, the optimal number of cycles is still unclear. The current study retrospectively assessed the clinical outcome in patients who received gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer to clarify the timing of switching from GC therapy. A total of 61 patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who received first-line chemotherapy with GC were retrospectively reviewed at National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center between June 2009 and August 2017. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The significance of associations between the clinical parameters and OS was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. The median cycle number for GC chemotherapy was 4. The median PFS and OS of all cases was 5.2 and 14.1 months, respectively. The multivariate analyses revealed that a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥3.0 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.521, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.179-5.624; P=0.017) and best response to GC therapy of CR+PR (HR 0.110; 95% CI=0.028-0.411; P<0.001) were independent prognostic factors. However, the number of GC cycles (≤4 vs. >4) was not an independent prognostic factor (P=0.387). The current retrospective study indicated that changes to therapy should be considered at an early stage for cases with a therapeutic effect of SD or less, regardless of the number of GC therapy cycles.

Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer in Japanese patients: a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial

Background

The open-label, randomized, active-controlled KEYNOTE-045 study (NCT02256436) showed that second-line pembrolizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (UC) that progressed after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy, compared with standard chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine). Pembrolizumab is approved for patients with bladder cancer in Japan.

Patients and methods

Analysis was performed in the subgroup of Japanese patients enrolled in the KEYNOTE-045 study. Coprimary end points were OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Objective response rate (ORR) and safety were secondary end points.

Results

Fifty-two Japanese patients (pembrolizumab, n = 30; chemotherapy, n = 22) were followed up for a median of 26.1 months. Patients who received pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy had a 19% lower risk for death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.44–1.50); after adjusting for baseline covariates, the HR for OS was 0.61 (95% CI 0.32–1.15). The 24-month OS rate was higher with pembrolizumab (26.9% vs 14.3%). PFS was 2.0 and 4.9 months for pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, respectively (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.95–3.08). ORR was similar for pembrolizumab and chemotherapy (20.0% vs 18.2%); durability of response was higher with pembrolizumab: 67% and 33% of patients, respectively, maintained a response for > 12 months. Treatment-related adverse events, including grade 3–5 events, occurred less frequently with pembrolizumab.

Conclusions

Pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity in patients with locally advanced/metastatic UC that progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy in the overall population and in the Japanese subgroup; safety profile was consistent with that previously observed for pembrolizumab.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10147-019-01545-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Nivolumab in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: CheckMate 275 2-year global and Japanese patient population analyses

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab has demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in the single-arm, phase II CheckMate 275 study in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma. We report updated results of the global population and a subanalysis of Japanese patients from this study.

METHODS

Patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) confirmed by blinded independent review committee (BIRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) by BIRC and overall survival (OS). Safety was also reported. The minimum follow-up was 21 months.

RESULTS

Overall, 270 patients were treated with nivolumab globally; 23 patients were Japanese. In the global and Japanese populations, respectively, ORR per BIRC was 20.4% and 21.7%; median PFS was 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-2.3) and 3.8 months (95% CI 1.9-7.2); and median OS was 8.6 (95% CI 6.1-11.3) and 21.0 months (95% CI 7.2-not reached). The most common any grade treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (18.1%) and diarrhea (12.2%) in the global population; the most common in the Japanese population were diarrhea (26.1%) and pyrexia (13.0%). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 61 (22.6%) and seven (30.4%) of the global and Japanese patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab continues to show antitumor activity and survival in the global population of CheckMate 275. Meaningful clinical benefit was also observed in Japanese patients. No new safety signals were identified.

Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of second-line combination chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of second-line chemotherapy regimens with docetaxel and gemcitabine (GD), or paclitaxel and gemcitabine (GP) for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) that did not respond to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

From 2002 to 2017, 78 patients with metastatic UCs that progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy were treated with either GD (n = 41) or GP (n = 37). We compared these two different regimens by analyzing their efficacy and toxicities in a retrospective manner.

RESULTS

Of the 78 patients enrolled in this study, it was possible to determine treatment efficacy in 70; the proportion of patients with objective response and disease control were 8.6 (9/70) and 54.3% (38/70), respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival in the total population (GP and GD) were 3.5 (95% CI 0.6-53.3) and 9.6 months (95% CI 1.2-53.3), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two regimens (GD or GP) regarding survival outcomes. Treatment-related adverse events were mostly manageable, but one patient died as a result of febrile neutropenia. The presence of liver metastasis and anemia (Hb < 10.0 g/dl) was prognostic factors for worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy with either GP or GD was a favorable and well-tolerated second-line treatment regimen for patients with advanced or metastatic UC following the failure of a platinum-based regimen. Further study using a large prospective cohort is needed to identify patients who will benefit from second-line combination therapy.