1
|
Oedorf K, Haug ES, Liedberg F, Järvinen R, Gudjonsson S, Boström PJ, Jerlström T, Gudbrandsdottir G, Jensen JB, Lam GW. Perioperative management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the Nordic countries. BMC Urol 2024; 24:132. [PMID: 38914985 PMCID: PMC11197368 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01515-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy, with typically only few new cases annually per urological department. Adherence to European association of urology (EAU) guidelines on UTUC in the Nordic countries is unknown. The objective of this survey was to examine the implementation of EAU guidelines, the perioperative management and organization of the treatment of UTUC in the Nordic countries. METHODS The electronic survey was distributed to 93 hospitals in the Nordic countries performing radical nephroureterectomy (NU). The survey consisted of 57 main questions and data was collected between December 1st, 2021 and April 23rd, 2022. RESULTS Overall response rate was 47/93 (67%) with a completion rate of 98%. Five out of the 6 examined subjects on diagnostic practice are applied by ≥ 72% of the participating centers. NU as treatment for high-risk UTUC is performed by 37/47 (79%), and 91% include a bladder cuff excision. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to EAU guidelines is high on diagnostic practice in the Nordic countries, whereas disease management is less coherent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimie Oedorf
- Department of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skaanes Universitetssjukhus, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Riikka Järvinen
- Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sigurdur Gudjonsson
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Iceland, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Peter J Boström
- Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Tomas Jerlström
- Department of Urology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | | | | | - Gitte Wrist Lam
- Department of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yu Z, Xiong Z, Ma J, Du P, Wang S, Liu J, Cao Y, Yang Y. Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of systemic immune-inflammation index in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 3911 patients. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1342996. [PMID: 38947894 PMCID: PMC11211359 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1342996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), a novel prognostic indicator, is being more commonly utilized in different types of cancer. This research project involved combining information from previously published studies to examine how pre-treatment SII can predict outcomes in individuals with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Further examination of the correlation between SII and clinical and pathological features in UTUC. Methods We thoroughly chose pertinent articles from various databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang database, and Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP) until March 10, 2022.The data collected was analyzed using Stata 17.0 software (Stat Corp, College Station, TX). Subsequently, the impact of SII on the survival outcomes of UTUC patients was evaluated by combining HRs with 95% confidence intervals. Results Six included studies were finally confirmed, including 3911 UTUC patients in seven cohorts. The results showed that high SII before treatment predicted poor overall survival (HR =1.87, 95%CI 1.20-2.92, p=0.005), cancer specific survival (HR=2.70, 95%CI 1.47-4.96, P=0.001), and recurrence-free survival (HR =1.52, 95%CI 1.12-2.07, P=0.007). And the elevated SII may be related to LVI (present vs. absent) (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.71-0.97, p=0.018), pT stage (pT ≥3 vs. < 3) (OR=1.82, 95% CI=1.21-2.72, p=0.004), and pN stage (N+ vs. N0) (OR=3.27, 95% CI=1.60-6.71, p=0.001). Conclusion A comprehensive analysis of all included articles in this study showed that higher pretreatment SII was related to poorer survival outcomes and adverse pathological features independently. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022316333.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyi Yu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Urological Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Zhencheng Xiong
- Trauma Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics Surgery, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jinchao Ma
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Urological Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Du
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Urological Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Shuo Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Urological Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Urological Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yudong Cao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Urological Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Yang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Urological Department, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shojo K, Takeda T, Akita H, Suzuki T, Mikami S, Shigeta K, Yasumizu Y, Tanaka N, Matsumoto K, Morita S, Kosaka T, Mizuno R, Asanuma H, Jinzaki M, Oya M. Prediction of pathological up-staging after radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2024; 42:192. [PMID: 38530492 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04808-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography urography for upper tract urothelial carcinoma is high; however, difficulties are associated with precisely assessing the T stage. Preoperative tumor staging has an impact on treatment options for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We herein attempted to identify preoperative factors that predict pathological tumor up-staging, which will facilitate the selection of treatment strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified 148 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent computed tomography urography preoperatively followed by radical nephroureterectomy without preoperative chemotherapy at our institution between 2000 and 2021. Preoperative factors associated with cT2 or lower to pT3 up-staging were examined using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Ninety out of 148 patients were diagnosed with cT2 or lower, and 22 (24%) were up-staged to pT3. A multivariate analysis identified a positive voided urine cytology (HR 4.69, p = 0.023) and tumor length ≥ 3 cm (HR 6.33, p = 0.003) as independent predictors of pathological tumor up-staging. CONCLUSIONS Patients diagnosed with cT2 or lower, but with preoperative positive voided urine cytology and/or tumor diameter ≥ 3 cm need to be considered for treatment as cT3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunori Shojo
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Takeda
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Hirotaka Akita
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Shuji Mikami
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital, 2-1 Suwa, Wako-shi, Saitama, 351-0102, Japan
| | - Keisuke Shigeta
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yota Yasumizu
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Shinya Morita
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Takeo Kosaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Mizuno
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Asanuma
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Masahiro Jinzaki
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ślusarczyk A, Zapała P, Piecha T, Rajwa P, Moschini M, Radziszewski P. The Association between Lymph Node Dissection and Survival in Lymph Node-Negative Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4660. [PMID: 37760628 PMCID: PMC10526221 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The benefit of lymph node dissection (LND) during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in lymph node (LN)-negative (cN0/pN0) UTUC remains controversial. We aimed to assess the association between LND and its extent and survival in LN-negative UTUC. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was searched to identify patients with non-metastatic chemotherapy-naïve cN0/pNx or pN0 UTUC who underwent RNU +/- LND between 2004 and 2019. Overall, 4649 patients with cN0/pNx or pN0 UTUC were analyzed, including 909 (19.55%) individuals who had LND. Among them, only in 368 patients (7.92%) was LND extended to at least four LNs, and the remaining 541 patients (11.64%) have had < four LNs removed. In the whole cohort, LND contributed to better cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, a propensity score-matched analysis adjusted for confounders confirmed that improved CSS and OS was achieved only when ≥ four LNs had been removed, especially in muscle-invasive UTUC. A multivariable analysis further confirmed an association between the extent of LND and CSS. To conclude, adequate LND during RNU was associated with improved OS and CSS in LN-negative UTUC, particularly in muscle-invasive stage. This underscores that a sufficient LN yield is required to reveal a therapeutic benefit in patients undergoing RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksander Ślusarczyk
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Zapała
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Piecha
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Piotr Radziszewski
- Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chang LW, Hung SC, Chen CS, Li JR, Chiu KY, Wang SS, Yang CK, Lu K, Chen CC, Wang SC, Lin CY, Cheng CL, Ou YC, Yang SF. Geriatric nutritional risk index as a prognostic marker for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma receiving radical nephroureterectomy. Sci Rep 2023; 13:4554. [PMID: 36941480 PMCID: PMC10027676 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31814-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
To investigate the prognostic value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) in patients with upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC) receiving radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Between January 2001 and December 2015, we enrolled 488 patients with UTUC underwent RNU in Taichung Veterans General Hospital. GNRI before radical surgery was calculated based on serum albumin level and body mass index. The malnutritional status was defined as GNRI < 92.0. Using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the risk factors on disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). 386 patients were categorized as normal nutritional status (GNRI ≥ 92) and 102 patients as malnutritional status (GNRI < 92). We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for determined the association between GNRI and OS, with area under the curve (AUC) being 0.69. The 5-year survival rate of DFS, CSS and OS were 48.6%, 80.5% and 80.5% in the normal nutritional group and 28.0%, 53.2% and 40% in the malnutritional group. Using the multivariate analysis, malnutritional status was found as an independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.70-5.74), together with age (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.06), surgical margin positive (HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.13-2.82), pathological T3 (HR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.53-4.21), pathological T4 (HR = 6.75, 95% CI 3.17-14.37) and lymphovascular invasion (HR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.16-2.81). We also found GNRI index as independent risk factor in DFS (HR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.42-2.54) and CSS (HR = 5.42, 95% CI 3.24-9.06). Preoperative malnutritional status with low GNRI is an independent marker in predicting DFS, CSS and OS in UTUC patients underwent RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Wen Chang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec.1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung, 40201, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Sheng-Chun Hung
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec.1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung, 40201, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec.1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung, 40201, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Jian-Ri Li
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec.1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung, 40201, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Medicine and Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Kun-Yuan Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Medicine and Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec.1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung, 40201, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Medicine and Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Kuang Yang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Kevin Lu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Che Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shu-Chi Wang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Chia-Yen Lin
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec.1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung, 40201, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Li Cheng
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec.1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung, 40201, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Yen-Chuan Ou
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec.1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung, 40201, Taiwan, ROC
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
- Department of Urology, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
| | - Shun-Fa Yang
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, No. 110, Sec.1, Jianguo N. Rd., Taichung, 40201, Taiwan, ROC.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Britton CJ, Gottlich HC, Tarrell RF, Thapa P, Joyce DD, Shah PH, Sharma V, Boorjian SA, Frank I, Potretzke AM. Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes Associated with Simultaneous Radical Cystectomy and Nephroureterectomy. Urology 2023; 172:149-156. [PMID: 36436677 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes associated with RCNU to a matched cohort undergoing RC alone. Simultaneous radical cystectomy and nephroureterectomy (RCNU) for synchronous upper tract and bladder urothelial carcinoma is an uncommon procedure. Sparse literature exists comparing outcomes in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) alone versus RCNU. METHODS Adults treated with RCNU for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) between 1980 and 2020 were identified. Patients were matched 2:1 to patients undergoing RC alone for UCB based on age (+/- 5 years), gender, BMI (+/- 5), Charlson Comorbidity Index, pathologic staging (stage ≤pT2 vs >pT2), and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), recurrence free survival (RFS), cancer specific survival (CSS), 30-day complications, length of stay (LOS), operative time, and estimated blood loss (EBL). RESULTS A total of 39 patients undergoing RCNU were identified and matched to 74 patients undergoing RC. There were no significant differences in LOS, EBL, or 30-day complication rates. Operative time was significantly longer in the RC cohort. OS (HR 0.58, CI 0.35-0.97, P = .036) was significantly better for patients undergoing RC alone, while no significant difference was noted in RFS (HR 0.65, 0.34-1.24) and CSS (HR 0.58, CI 0.31-1.08, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing RCNU had significantly lower OS compared to a matched group of patients undergoing RC alone. Perioperative outcomes between the groups did not differ significantly. This data can inform patient counseling for treatment of this rare disease state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Robert F Tarrell
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Prabin Thapa
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Paras H Shah
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Igor Frank
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chu Y, Ning H, Yin K, Chen T, Wu H, Wang D, Liu F, Zhao Z, Lv J. Case report: Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis masquerading as a renal abscess. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1055229. [PMID: 36756151 PMCID: PMC9899929 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1055229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (SUC), a rare tumor of the urinary tract epithelium, exhibits a high degree of malignancy and therefore a poor prognosis. Due to the absence of specific clinical presentations and imaging findings, SUC of the renal pelvis masquerades as a renal abscess is frequently under-recognized or misdiagnosed as benign inflammatory disease, resulting in delayed or erroneous treatment. Here, we report a patient with SUC of the renal pelvis who presented with a renal abscess. Repeated anti-inflammatory treatment was ineffective. Unexpectedly, cancerous cells were detected in subsequent exfoliative cytology of nephrostomy drainage fluid. In accordance with this, radical surgery and postoperative chemotherapy were conducted. Fortunately, neither recurrence nor metastasis occurred during a one-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaru Chu
- Department of Urology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Hao Ning
- Department of Urology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China,Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Ke Yin
- Department of Pathology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Tong Chen
- Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Haihu Wu
- Department of Urology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China,Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Delin Wang
- Department of Urology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Feifan Liu
- Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Zhenlin Zhao
- Department of Urology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Jiaju Lv
- Department of Urology, Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China,Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University School of Medicine, Jinan, China,*Correspondence: Jiaju Lv,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cui Y, Lu Y, Wu J, Quan C. Benefits of lymphadenectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma only located in the lower ureter: a bicentre retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1115830. [PMID: 37124512 PMCID: PMC10140303 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1115830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and highly malignant urothelial tumor originating from the renal pelvis and ureter associated with poor prognosis. It has been established that 70% of ureteral tumors occur in the lower ureter. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with ipsilateral bladder cuff excision is regarded as the standard treatment for UTUC. Current evidence supports the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in determining tumor staging, but no consensus has been reached on the potential survival benefits. The present study retrospectively analyzed cases of UTUC limited to the lower ureter to evaluate the survival benefits of LND during RNU. Methods The present study retrospectively analyzed data from patients with UTUC limited to the lower ureter from two medical centers from 2000 to 2016 and assessed the survival outcomes, including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). During subgroup analysis, we stratified by pathological tumor (pT) stages and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Results The study cohort included 297 patients separated into LND (n=111) and non-LND (n=186) groups. The two groups were comparable except for the pathological N stage. The LND group was associated with superior survival in terms of RFS (27.0% vs. 18.3%, p=0.044) and CSS (53.2 vs. 39.8%, p=0.031) compared to the non-LND group (n=186). In pT2-4 patients, the LND group was associated with better 3-year RFS (50.5% vs. 32.3%, p<0.05), 5-year RFS (29.7% vs. 12.0%, p<0.05), and overall RFS (18.7% vs. 6.0%, p<0.05) than the non-LND group. Besides, the LND group was associated with a significantly better 3-year CSS (68.1% vs. 49.6%, p=0.003), 5-year CSS (51.6% vs. 30.8%, p<0.05) and overall CSS (45.1% vs. 24.1%, p<0.05). In patients that underwent AC, the LND group had better survival benefits in terms of RFS (29.4 vs. 16.7%, p=0.023) and CSS (52.9% vs. 40.5%, p=0.038) compared to the non-LND group. Conclusion LND has survival benefits in patients with UTUC localized to the lower ureter, especially for≥pT2 stage UTUC and AC cohorts. Overall, the therapeutic effect of LND in UTUC cannot be replaced by AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yupeng Cui
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Youyi Lu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Jitao Wu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
- *Correspondence: Changyi Quan, ; Jitao Wu,
| | - Changyi Quan
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
- *Correspondence: Changyi Quan, ; Jitao Wu,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Piontkowski AJ, Corsi N, Morisetty S, Majdalany S, Rakic I, Li P, Arora S, Jamil M, Rogers C, Autorino R, Abdollah F. Benefit of lymph node dissection in cN+ patients in the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of NCDB registry. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:409.e9-409.e17. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
10
|
Ma R, Liu Z, Cheng Y, Zhou P, Pan Y, Bi H, Tao L, Yang B, Xia H, Zhu X, He J, He W, Wang G, Huang Y, Ma L, Lu J. Prognostic Value of Tumor Size in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 42:19-29. [PMID: 35783990 PMCID: PMC9244730 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
11
|
Saini S, Pathak RA, Hemal AK. Robotic nephroureterectomy in the management of upper tract urothelial cancer: inching toward standard of care? Int Urol Nephrol 2022; 54:1777-1785. [PMID: 35610528 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03225-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma is a relatively rare malignancy. Current guidelines strongly recommend radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision and template-based lymph node dissection for all high-risk upper-tract urothelial carcinomas. Although the open approach is still considered the standard of care, evolution of minimally invasive approaches especially the robotic-assisted approach, has been found to be oncologically equivalent. Since its initial description in 2006, the surgical technique as well as the robotic surgical system has gone through a major evolution. With well-established advantages of the minimally invasive approach, robotic radical nephroureterectomy also has the ability to address both upper and lower urinary tract simultaneously without the need of patient repositioning, standardized single docking technique, ease of performing crucial steps like excision of ureterovesical junction and bladder cuff with watertight cystotomy closure, allowing perioperative instillation of intra-vesical chemotherapy. Robot-assisted radical nephro-ureterectomy and template-based lymph node dissection is gradually emerging as the current standard of care to achieve the best possible oncologic and functional outcomes. In this review article we are focusing on the evolution of this approach in the management of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma along with a review of oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumit Saini
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Ram Anil Pathak
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA
| | - Ashok Kumar Hemal
- Department of Urology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee HY, Chang CH, Huang CP, Yu CC, Lo CW, Chung SD, Wu WC, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Chen YT, Lin CM, Tsai YC, Chen WC, Chiang BJ, Huang HC, Chen CH, Huang CY, Wu CC, Lin WY, Tseng JS, Ke HL, Yeh HC. Is Lymph Node Dissection Necessary During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Clinically Node-Negative Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma? A Multi-Institutional Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:791620. [PMID: 35574295 PMCID: PMC9099435 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.791620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) without clinical lymph node metastasis (cN0) undergoing lymph node dissection (LND) during radical nephroureterectomy (NU).MethodsFrom the updated data of the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group, a total of 2726 UTUC patients were identified. We only include patients with ≥ pT2 stage and enrolled 658 patients. The Kaplan–Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS) in LND (+) and LND (−) groups.ResultsA total of 658 patients were included and 463 patients without receiving LND and 195 patients receiving LND. From both univariate and multivariate survival analysis, there are no significant difference between LND (+) and LND (-) group in survival rate. In LND (+) group, 18.5% patients have pathological LN metastasis. After analyzing pN+ subgroup, it revealed worse CSS (p = 0.010) and DFS (p < 0.001) compared with pN0 patients.ConclusionsWe found no significant survival benefit related to LND in cN0 stage, ≥ pT2 stage UTUC, irrespective of the number of LNs removed, although pN+ affected cancer prognosis. However, from the result of pN (+) subgroup of LND (+) cohort analysis, it may be reasonable to not perform LND in patients with cT2N0 stage due to low positive predictive value of pN (+). In addition, performing LND may be considered for ureter cancer, which tends to cause lymphatic and hematogenous tumor spreading. Further large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shiu-Dong Chung
- Graduate Program in Biomedical Informatics, College of Informatics, Yuan-Ze University, Chung-Li, Taiwan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Che Wu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y. Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W. Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chang-Min Lin
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chieh Chen
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Che Huang
- Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsin Chen
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Lung Ke
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Hsin-Chih Yeh,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Peyrottes A, Califano G, Ouzaïd I, Lainé-Caroff P, Long Depaquit T, Hermieu JF, Xylinas E. Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephro-Ureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Review. Front Surg 2022; 9:852969. [PMID: 35402485 PMCID: PMC8987284 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.852969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Although lymphonodal dissection is well-accepted for muscle-invasive bladder cancer management, its role is still debated during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The aim of this study was to summarize the current knowledge concerning the indication, anatomical template, prognostic, and therapeutic roles of lymph node dissection (LND) performed at the time of RNU. Quality control markers, such as the number of lymph nodes (LN) removed, lymph node density, and safety of the different surgical approaches, were assessed. We performed a narrative review using the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. We identified and analyzed articles based on the practice and the role of lymph node dissection for non-metastatic UTUC. There are no clear guidelines regarding the indication of LND for UTUC, but aggressive tumors may beneficiate from lymphadenectomy since lymph node invasion is a clear independent poor prognostic factor, allowing for adjuvant treatments. It seems that an extended lymphadenectomy may provide therapeutic advantages as a higher number of nodes removed may be related to the removal of undetected LNs micrometastases and a subsequent improvement in recurrence rate and cancer-specific survival. Clear anatomical templates are thus needed based on the location and the laterality of the primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Peyrottes
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Idir Ouzaïd
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Paul Lainé-Caroff
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Thibaut Long Depaquit
- Urology Unit, Military Teaching Hospital Sainte Anne, French Military Health Service, Toulon, France
| | - Jean-François Hermieu
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France
- *Correspondence: Evanguelos Xylinas
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Novel nomograms to predict muscle invasion and lymph node metastasis in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:108.e11-108.e17. [PMID: 35034804 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop accurate preoperative nomograms for prediction of muscle-invasive disease and lymph node metastasis in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), to assist surgeons in risk stratifying patients and help guide treatment decisions. MATERIALS/METHODS The National Cancer Database was used to identify all patients from 2004 to 2016 with UTUC who underwent extirpative surgery and lymphadenectomy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify variables predicting muscle-invasive and node-positive disease. The data set was split 80:20 into a derivation and validation cohort and used to generate and test two nomograms. Nomograms were assessed using area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plots. RESULTS A total of 6,143 patients met inclusion criteria. Predictors of muscle-invasive disease were age, grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), tumor size, and positive clinical lymph node status. Predictors of node-positive disease were grade, LVI, tumor size, and positive clinical lymph node status. The accuracy of the final nomogram predicting muscle-invasive disease was 80.0% (AUC 0.800, corrected C-index 0.813), and the accuracy of the nomogram predicting node-positive disease was 87.8% (AUC 0.878, corrected C-index 0.887). CONCLUSIONS With data readily available after imaging and biopsy (age, tumor grade, LVI status, tumor size, and clinical lymph node status), we developed the first preoperative nomograms to quantitatively predict muscle-invasive disease and lymph node metastasis in UTUC, with an accuracy of 80.0% and 87.8% respectively. This information could be helpful to assist surgeons with pre-operative risk stratification.
Collapse
|
15
|
Cinque A, Capasso A, Vago R, Floris M, Lee MW, Minnei R, Trevisani F. MicroRNA Signatures in the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Scenario: Ready for the Game Changer? Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:2602. [PMID: 35269744 PMCID: PMC8910117 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents a minor subgroup of malignancies arising in the urothelium of the renal pelvis or ureter. The estimated annual incidence is around 2 cases per 100,000 people, with a mean age at diagnosis of 73 years. UTUC is more frequently diagnosed in an invasive or metastatic stage. However, even though the incidence of UTUC is not high, UTUC tends to be aggressive and rapidly progressing with a poor prognosis in some patients. A significant challenge in UTUC is ensuring accurate and timely diagnosis, which is complicated by the non-specific nature of symptoms seen at the onset of disease. Moreover, there is a lack of biomarkers capable of identifying the early presence of the malignancy and guide-tailored medical treatment. However, the growing understanding of the molecular biology underlying UTUC has led to the discovery of promising new biomarkers. Among these biomarkers, there is a class of small non-coding RNA biomarkers known as microRNAs (miRNAs) that are particularly promising. In this review, we will analyze the main characteristics of UTUC and focus on microRNAs as possible novel tools that could enter clinical practice in order to optimize the current diagnostic and prognostic algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Cinque
- Biorek S.r.l., San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Anna Capasso
- Department of Medical Oncology Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78723, USA;
| | - Riccardo Vago
- Urological Research Institute, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery,, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Floris
- Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, G. Brotzu Hospital, 09134 Cagliari, Italy; (M.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Michael W. Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology and Medical Education, Dell Medical School, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78723, USA;
| | - Roberto Minnei
- Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, G. Brotzu Hospital, 09134 Cagliari, Italy; (M.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Francesco Trevisani
- Biorek S.r.l., San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Urological Research Institute, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Unit of Urology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lin CY, Weng HY, Tai TY, Wu HC, Chen WC, Chen CH, Huang CY, Lo CW, Yu CC, Tsai CY, Wu WC, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Chiang BJ, Huang HC, Chen IHA, Chen YT, Lin WY, Wu CC, Tsai YC, Lee HY, Li WM. Clinical Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (pT3-T4): Real-World Data from the Taiwan Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration Group. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12020226. [PMID: 35207714 PMCID: PMC8877034 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12020226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is unclear. We aimed to assess the therapeutic outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced UTUC (pT3-T4) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We retrospectively reviewed the data of 2108 patients from the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group between 1988 and 2018. Comprehensive clinical features, pathological characteristics, and survival outcomes were recorded. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Of the 533 patients with advanced UTUC included, 161 (30.2%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. In the multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of overall death (hazard ratio (HR), 0.599; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.419–0.857; p = 0.005), cancer-specific mortality (HR, 0.598; 95% CI, 0.391–0.914; p = 0.018), and cancer recurrence (HR, 0.456; 95% CI, 0.310–0.673; p < 0.001). The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly better five-year OS (64% vs. 50%, p = 0.002), CSS (70% vs. 62%, p = 0.043), and DFS (60% vs. 48%, p = 0.002) rates compared to those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, adjuvant chemotherapy after RNU had significant therapeutic benefits on OS, CSS, and DFS in advanced UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung-Yu Lin
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan; (C.-Y.L.); (H.-Y.L.)
| | - Han-Yu Weng
- Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan; (H.-Y.W.); (T.-Y.T.)
| | - Ta-Yao Tai
- Department of Urology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704, Taiwan; (H.-Y.W.); (T.-Y.T.)
| | - Hsi-Chin Wu
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (H.-C.W.); (W.-C.C.)
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin 651, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chi Chen
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan; (H.-C.W.); (W.-C.C.)
- Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Hsin Chen
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan; (C.-H.C.); (C.-Y.H.)
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan; (C.-H.C.); (C.-Y.H.)
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan; (C.-W.L.); (C.-C.Y.)
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan; (C.-W.L.); (C.-C.Y.)
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
| | - Chung-You Tsai
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan; (C.-Y.T.); (W.-C.W.)
- Department of Healthcare Information and Management, Ming Chuan University, Taipei 111, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Che Wu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan; (C.-Y.T.); (W.-C.W.)
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan; (Y.-H.J.); (Y.-K.L.)
| | - Yu-Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan; (Y.-H.J.); (Y.-K.L.)
| | - Thomas Y. Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei 106, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| | - Allen W. Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan;
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242, Taiwan;
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan;
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Che Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City 231, Taiwan;
- Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan;
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei 105, Taiwan;
| | - Wei-Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi 613, Taiwan;
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi 613, Taiwan
- Department of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 235, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan;
- TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan; (C.-Y.L.); (H.-Y.L.)
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan; (C.-Y.L.); (H.-Y.L.)
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
- Center for Liquid Biopsy and Cohort Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung 900, Taiwan
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
König F, Shariat SF, Karakiewicz PI, Mun DH, Rink M, Pradere B. Quality indicators for the management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma requiring radical nephroureterectomy. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:291-296. [PMID: 33973537 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article was to identify quality indicators for an optimized management of high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) requiring radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). RECENT FINDINGS RNU with bladder cuff resection is the standard treatment of high-risk UTUC. For the bladder cuff resection, two main approaches are accepted: transvesical and extravesical. Lymph node dissection following a dedicated template should be performed in all high-risk patients undergoing RNU as it improves tumour staging and possibly survival. Postoperative bladder instillation of single-dose chemotherapy should be administered after RNU to decrease the risk of intravesical tumour recurrence. Perioperative systemic chemotherapy should always be considered for advanced cancers. Although level-1 evidence is available for adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, neoadjuvant regimens are still being evaluated. SUMMARY Optimal management of high-risk UTUC requires evidence-based reproducible quality indicators in order to allow guidance and frameworks for clinical practices. Adherence to quality indicators allows for the measurement and comparison of outcomes that are likely to improve prognosis. Based on the literature, we found four evidence-based accepted quality indicators that are easily implementable to improve the management of high-risk UTUC patients treated with RNU: adequate management of the distal ureter/ bladder cuff, template-based lymph node dissection, single-shot postoperative intravesical chemotherapy, and perioperative systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dong-Ho Mun
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update. Eur Urol 2020; 79:62-79. [PMID: 32593530 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 488] [Impact Index Per Article: 122.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, upper urinary tract carcinoma, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification as well as for radical and conservative treatment, and prognostic factors are discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumour and two functional kidneys. After radical nephroureterectomy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is indicated in locally advanced UTUC. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, an appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhai TS, Jin L, Zhou Z, Liu X, Liu H, Chen W, Lu JY, Yao XD, Feng LM, Ye L. Effect of lymph node dissection on stage-specific survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:1207. [PMID: 31830927 PMCID: PMC6907152 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6364-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to estimate the stage-specific impact of lymph node dissection (LND) on survival for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with nephroureterectomy (NU). Methods Overall, 7278 UTUC patients undergoing NU within the SEER database from 2004 to 2015 were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots illustrated overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates according to LND status. Multivariable Cox regression analyses assessed the effect of LND on OS and CSS rates stratified by pathological tumor stage. Results LND was performed in 26.9% of patients, and in 18.6, 23.3, 31.2 and 45.9% for pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 patients, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analyses, LND was associated with a higher OS or CSS in UTUC patients with pT3 and pT4 disease (all P < 0.05), but failed to achieve independent predictor status in patients with pT1 and pT2 disease (all P > 0.05). LND with 1 to 3 regional lymph nodes removed was prone to a higher OS or CSS only in pT4 compared to no LND (both P < 0.01). LND with 4 or more regional lymph nodes removed predisposed to a higher OS or CSS in pT3 or pT4 (all P < 0.05). Conclusions The beneficial effect of LND especially LND with 4 or more regional lymph nodes removed on survival was evident in pT3/4 patients. LND can be considered for pT3 and pT4, for pT1/2 remains to be seen, both of which will be verified by further prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Shuai Zhai
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Liang Jin
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Zhen Zhou
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.,Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China
| | - Xiang Liu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.,Department of Urology, Shanghai Putuo District People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200333, China
| | - Huan Liu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Urology, Shawan People's Hospital, Shawan, Xinjiang, 832100, China
| | - Jing-Yi Lu
- Department of Urology, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, Xinjiang, 834000, China
| | - Xu-Dong Yao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
| | - Li-Ming Feng
- Department of Urology, Shawan People's Hospital, Shawan, Xinjiang, 832100, China.
| | - Lin Ye
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China. .,Department of Urology, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, Xinjiang, 834000, China.
| |
Collapse
|