Duration of predialysis nephrological care and mortality after dialysis initiation

Pre-dialysis care trajectory and post-dialysis survival and transplantation access in patients with end-stage kidney disease

BACKGROUND

The pre-dialysis care trajectory impact on post-dialysis outcomes is poorly known. This study assessed survival, access to kidney transplant waiting list and to transplantation after dialysis initiation by taking into account the patients' pre-dialysis care consumption (inpatient and outpatient) and the conditions of dialysis start: initiation context (emergency or planned) and vascular access type (catheter or fistula).

METHODS

Adults who started dialysis in France in 2015 were included. Clinical data came from the French REIN registry and data on the care trajectory from the French National Health Data system (SNDS). The Cox model was used to assess survival and access to kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

We included 8856 patients with a mean age of 68 years. Survival was shorter in patients with emergency or planned dialysis initiation with a catheter compared to patients with planned dialysis with a fistula. The risk of death was lower in patients who were seen by a nephrologist more than once in the 6 months before dialysis than in those who were seen only once. The rate of kidney transplant at 1 year post-dialysis was lower for patients with emergency or planned dialysis initiation with a catheter (respectively, HR = 0.5 [0.4; 0.8] and HR = 0.7 [0.5; 0.9]) compared to patients with planned dialysis start with a fistula. Patients who were seen by a nephrologist more than three times between 0 and 6 months before dialysis start were more likely to access the waiting list 1 and 3 years after dialysis start (respectively, HR = 1.3 [1.1; 1.5] and HR = 1.2 [1.1; 1.4]).

CONCLUSIONS

Nephrological follow-up in the year before dialysis initiation is associated with better survival and higher probability of access to kidney transplantation. These results emphasize the importance of early patient referral to nephrologists by general practitioners.

Choice of the Dialysis Modality: Practical Considerations

Chronic kidney disease and the need for kidney replacement therapy have increased dramatically in recent decades. Forecasts for the coming years predict an even greater increase, especially in low- and middle-income countries, due to the rise in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases and the aging population. Access to kidney replacement treatments may not be available to all patients, making it especially strategic to set up therapy programs that can ensure the best possible treatment for the greatest number of patients. The choice of the "ideal" kidney replacement therapy often conflicts with medical availability and the patient's tolerance. This paper discusses the pros and cons of various kidney replacement therapy options and their real-world applicability limits.

Referral pattern to nephrologist and prognosis in diabetic kidney disease patients: Single center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Management of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) to prevent end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has become a major challenge for health care professionals. This study aims to investigate the characteristics of patients with DKD when they are first referred to a nephrologist and the subsequent prognoses.

METHODS

A total of 307 patients who were referred to our department from October 2010 to September 2014 at Osaka General Medical Center were analyzed. Independent risk factors associated with renal replacement therapy (RRT) and cardiovascular composite events (CVE) following their nephrology referral were later identified using Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

Of 307 patients, 26 (8.5%), 67 (21.8%), 134 (43.6%), and 80 (26.1%) patients were categorized as having chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3a, 3b, 4, and 5, respectively. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary protein levels were 22.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 2.83 g/gCr, respectively, at the time of the nephrology referral. During the follow-up period (median, 30 months), 121 patients required RRT, and more than half of the patients with CKD stages 5 and 4 reached ESKD within 60 months following their nephrology referral; 30% and <10% of the patients with CKD stages 3b and 3a, respectively, required RRT within 60 months following their nephrology referral.

CONCLUSION

Patients with DKD were referred to nephrologist at CKD stage 4. Although almost half of the patients with CKD stage 5 at the time of nephrology referral required RRT within one-and-a-half years after the referral, kidney function of patients who were referred to nephrologist at CKD stage 3 and 4 were well preserved.

Study on the Clinical Implications of NLR and PLR for Diagnosing Frailty in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients and Their Correlations with Patient Prognosis

Objective

To explore the clinical implications of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for diagnosing frailty in patients with maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and their correlations with patient prognosis.

Methods

A total of 185 patients with MHD admitted to the hemodialysis center of our hospital were selected, 72 of whom were diagnosed with frailty according to the Chinese version of Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI). The relevant data were collected, and the influencing factors of frailty in MHD patients were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multivariate logistic regression. The value of NLR and PLR in diagnosing frailty in MHD patients was observed, and patients' all-cause mortality was compared during the 3-year follow-up. The influences of different levels of NLR and PLR on the survival of MHD patients were investigated.

Results

Multivariate regression analysis identified that serum albumin, dialysis adequacy, NLR, and PLR are independent risk factors for frailty in MHD patients (P < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of NLR and PLR in diagnosing frailty in MHD patients was 0.859 and 0.799, respectively. Compared with the nonfrailty group, the 3-year mortality was higher, and the 3-year survival rate assessed by survival analysis was lower in the frailty group (P < 0.05). Patients with high NLR and PLR levels showed a lower 3-year survival rate.

Conclusions

Dialysis adequacy, serum albumin, NLR, and PLR are independently associated with frailty in MHD patients. NLR and PLR are of a certain diagnostic value for frailty in MHD patients. MHD patients with frailty have an unfavorable prognosis, as of those with high NLR and PLR levels.

Effect of Nephrology Care on Mortality in Incident Dialysis Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Long-term and continuous nephrology care effects on post-dialysis mortality remain unclear. This study aims to systematically explore the causal effect of nephrology care on mortality for patients with dialysis initiation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to include incident patients with dialysis for ≥ 3 months in Taiwan from 2004 through 2011. The continuous nephrology care of incident patients in the three years before their dialysis was measured every six months. Continuous nephrology care was determined by 0–6, 0–12, …, 0–36 months and their counterparts; and none, intermittent, 0–6 months, …, and 0–36 months. Simple and weighted hazards ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for one-year mortality were estimated after propensity score (PS) matching. We included a total of 44,698 patients (mean age 63.3 ± 14.2, male 51.9%). Receiving ≥ 1 year predialysis nephrology care was associated with a 22% lower post-dialysis mortality hazard. No different effects were found (ranges of PS matching HR: 0.77–0.80) when comparing the defined duration of nephrology care with their counterparts. Stepped survival benefits were newly identified in the intermittent care, which had slightly lower HRs (weighted HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79–0.97), followed by reviving care over six months to two years (ranges of weighted HR: 0.60–0.65), and reviving care over two years (ranges of weighted HR: 0.48–0.52). There was no existing critical period of nephrology care effect on post-dialysis, but there were extra survival benefits when extending nephrology care to >2 years, which suggests that continuous and long-term care during pre-dialysis/chronic kidney disease phase is required.