Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas

The Origin Along the Cochlea of Otoacoustic Emissions Evoked by Mid-Frequency Tone Pips

PURPOSE

Tone-pip-evoked otoacoustic emissions (PEOAEs) are transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) that are hypothesized to originate from reflection of energy near the best-frequency (BF) cochlear place of the stimulus frequency. However, individual PEOAEs have energy with a wide range of delays. We sought to determine whether some PEOAE energy is consistent with having been generated far from BF.

METHODS

PEOAEs from 35 and 47 dB SPL tone pips were obtained by removing pip-stimulus energy by subtracting the ear-canal sound pressure from scaled-down 59 dB SPL tone pips (which evoke relatively small OAEs). PEOAE delays were measured at each peak in the PEOAE absolute-value waveforms. While measuring PEOAEs and auditory-nerve compound action potentials (CAPs), amplification was blocked sequentially from apex to base by cochlear salicylate perfusion. The perfusion time when a CAP was reduced identified when the perfusion reached the tone-pip BF place. The perfusion times when each PEOAE peak was reduced identified where along the cochlea it received cochlear amplification. PEOAEs and CAPs were measured simultaneously using one pip frequency in each ear (1.4 to 4 kHz across 16 ears).

RESULTS

Most PEOAE peaks received amplification primarily between the BF place and 1-2 octaves basal of the BF place. PEOAE peaks with short delays received amplification basal of BF place. PEOAE peaks with longer delays sometimes received amplification apical of BF place, consistent with previous stimulus-frequency-OAE results.

CONCLUSION

PEOAEs provide information about cochlear amplification primarily within ~ 1.5 octave of the tone-pip BF place, not about regions > 3 octaves basal of BF.

Exploring the Influence of Extended High-Frequency Hearing on Cochlear Functioning at Lower Frequencies

PURPOSE

Diminished basal cochlear function, as indicated by elevated hearing thresholds in the extended high frequencies (EHFs), has been associated with lower levels of click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at lower frequencies. However, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) at low-probe levels are reflection-source emissions that do not share the same generation mechanism as distortion-source emissions. The primary objective of the present study was to examine the influence of hearing thresholds in the EHFs on SFOAEs measured at lower frequencies.

METHOD

SFOAEs were recorded from both ears in 45 individuals with normal hearing thresholds in the conventional audiometric frequencies (0.25-8 kHz). Hearing thresholds were also measured at EHFs (10, 12.5, and 16 kHz). SFOAE magnitudes and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were averaged across 1, 2, and 4 kHz probe frequencies and also averaged for high-probe frequencies (2 and 4 kHz).

RESULTS

SFOAE magnitudes and SNRs were significantly higher for ears with better EHF hearing relative to poorer EHF hearing, categorized based on the median split. In addition, hearing in the EHFs significantly contributed to the variance in all SFOAE measures, except for the high-frequency SFOAE magnitudes model. However, hearing thresholds at the probe frequencies did not significantly contribute to the variance in SFOAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings suggest that alterations in the basal cochlea, as revealed by EHF hearing thresholds, could be associated with diminished cochlear functioning in relatively apical regions, shown by SFOAEs at lower frequencies, in individuals with normal audiograms. These findings underscore the significance of considering EHF thresholds in audiological evaluations, as alterations in these frequencies may reflect broader cochlear health status.

Estimation of Cochlear Frequency Selectivity Using a Convolution Model of Forward-Masked Compound Action Potentials

PURPOSE

Frequency selectivity is a fundamental property of the peripheral auditory system; however, the invasiveness of auditory nerve (AN) experiments limits its study in the human ear. Compound action potentials (CAPs) associated with forward masking have been suggested as an alternative to assess cochlear frequency selectivity. Previous methods relied on an empirical comparison of AN and CAP tuning curves in animal models, arguably not taking full advantage of the information contained in forward-masked CAP waveforms.

METHODS

To improve the estimation of cochlear frequency selectivity based on the CAP, we introduce a convolution model to fit forward-masked CAP waveforms. The model generates masking patterns that, when convolved with a unitary response, can predict the masking of the CAP waveform induced by Gaussian noise maskers. Model parameters, including those characterizing frequency selectivity, are fine-tuned by minimizing waveform prediction errors across numerous masking conditions, yielding robust estimates.

RESULTS

The method was applied to click-evoked CAPs at the round window of anesthetized chinchillas using notched-noise maskers with various notch widths and attenuations. The estimated quality factor Q10 as a function of center frequency is shown to closely match the average quality factor obtained from AN fiber tuning curves, without the need for an empirical correction factor.

CONCLUSION

This study establishes a moderately invasive method for estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with potential applicability to other animal species or humans. Beyond the estimation of frequency selectivity, the proposed model proved to be remarkably accurate in fitting forward-masked CAP responses and could be extended to study more complex aspects of cochlear signal processing (e.g., compressive nonlinearities).

Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model

In response to an external stimulus, the cochlea emits sounds, called stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs), at the stimulus frequency. In this article, a three-dimensional computational model of the gerbil cochlea is used to simulate SFOAEs and clarify their generation mechanisms and characteristics. This model includes electromechanical feedback from outer hair cells (OHCs) and cochlear roughness due to spatially random inhomogeneities in the OHC properties. As in the experiments, SFOAE simulations are characterized by a quasiperiodic fine structure and a fast varying phase. Increasing the sound pressure level broadens the peaks and decreases the phase-gradient delay of SFOAEs. A state-space formulation of the model provides a theoretical framework to analyze the link between the fine structure and global modes of the cochlea, which arise as a result of standing wave resonances. The SFOAE fine structure peaks correspond to weakly damped resonant modes because they are observed at the frequencies of nearly unstable modes of the model. Variations of the model parameters that affect the reflection mechanism show that the magnitude and sharpness of the tuning of these peaks are correlated with the modal damping ratio of the nearly unstable modes. The analysis of the model predictions demonstrates that SFOAEs originate from the peak of the traveling wave.

Comparing spontaneous and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions in mice with tectorial membrane defects

The global standing-wave model for generation of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) suggests that they are amplitude-stabilized standing waves and that the spacing between SOAEs corresponds to the interval over which the phase changes by one cycle as determined from the phase-gradient delays of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs). Because data characterizing the relationship between spontaneous and evoked emissions in nonhuman mammals are limited, we examined SOAEs and SFOAEs in tectorial membrane (TM) mutants and their controls. Computations indicate that the spacing between adjacent SOAEs is predicted by the SFOAE phase-gradient delays for TM mutants lacking Ceacam16, where SOAE frequencies are greater than ~20 kHz and the mutants retain near-normal hearing when young. Mice with a missense mutation in Tecta (Tecta^Y1870C/+), as well as mice lacking Otoancorin (Otoa^-/-), were also examined. Although these mutants exhibit hearing loss, they generate SOAEs with average frequencies of 11 kHz in Tecta^Y1870C/+ and 6 kHz in Otoa^-/-. In these animals, the spacing between adjacent SOAEs is larger than predicted by the SFOAE phase delays. It is also demonstrated that mice do not exhibit the strong frequency-dependence in signal coding that characterizes species with good low-frequency hearing. In fact, a transition occurs near the apical end of the mouse cochlea rather than at the mid-point along the cochlear partition. Hence, disagreements with the standing-wave model are not easily explained by a transition in tuning ratios between apical and basal regions of the cochlea, especially for SOAEs generated in Tecta^Y1870C/+mice.

Frequency selectivity of tonal language native speakers probed by suppression tuning curves of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions

Native acquisition of a tonal language (TL) is related to enhanced abilities of pitch perception and production, compared to non-tonal language (NTL) native speakers. Moreover, differences in brain responses to both linguistically relevant and non-relevant pitch changes have been described in TL native speakers. It is so far unclear to which extent differences are present at the peripheral processing level of the cochlea. To determine possible differences in cochlear frequency selectivity between Asian TL speakers and Caucasian NTL speakers, suppression tuning curves (STCs) of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) were examined in both groups. By presenting pure tones, SOAE levels were suppressed and STCs were derived. SOAEs with center frequencies higher than 4.5 kHz were recorded only in female TL native speakers, which correlated with better high-frequency tone detection thresholds. The suppression thresholds at the tip of the STC and filter quality coefficient Q_10dB did not differ significantly between both language groups. Thus, the characteristics of the STCs of SOAEs do not support the presence of differences in peripheral auditory processing between TL and NTL native speakers.

Nonlinear reflection as a cause of the short-latency component in stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions simulated by the methods of compression and suppression

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) are generated by coherent reflection of forward traveling waves by perturbations along the basilar membrane. The strongest wavelets are backscattered near the place where the traveling wave reaches its maximal amplitude (tonotopic place). Therefore, the SFOAE group delay might be expected to be twice the group delay estimated in the cochlear filters. However, experimental data have yielded steady-state SFOAE components with near-zero latency. A cochlear model is used to show that short-latency SFOAE components can be generated due to nonlinear reflection of the compressor or suppressor tones used in SFOAE measurements. The simulations indicate that suppressors produce more pronounced short-latency components than compressors. The existence of nonlinear reflection components due to suppressors can also explain why SFOAEs can still be detected when suppressors are presented more than half an octave above the probe-tone frequency. Simulations of the SFOAE suppression tuning curves showed that phase changes in the SFOAE residual as the suppressor frequency increases are mostly determined by phase changes of the nonlinear reflection component.

Asymmetry and Microstructure of Temporal-Suppression Patterns in Basilar-Membrane Responses to Clicks: Relation to Tonal Suppression and Traveling-Wave Dispersion

The cochlea's wave-based signal processing allows it to efficiently decompose a complex acoustic waveform into frequency components. Because cochlear responses are nonlinear, the waves arising from one frequency component of a complex sound can be altered by the presence of others that overlap with it in time and space (e.g., two-tone suppression). Here, we investigate the suppression of basilar-membrane (BM) velocity responses to a transient signal (a test click) by another click or tone. We show that the BM response to the click can be reduced when the stimulus is shortly preceded or followed by another (suppressor) click. More surprisingly, the data reveal two curious dependencies on the interclick interval, Δt. First, the temporal suppression curve (amount of suppression vs. Δt) manifests a pronounced and nearly periodic microstructure. Second, temporal suppression is generally strongest not when the two clicks are presented simultaneously (Δt = 0), but when the suppressor click precedes the test click by a time interval corresponding to one to two periods of the best frequency (BF) at the measurement location. By systematically varying the phase of the suppressor click, we demonstrate that the suppression microstructure arises from alternating constructive and destructive interference between the BM responses to the two clicks. And by comparing temporal and tonal suppression in the same animals, we test the hypothesis that the asymmetry of the temporal-suppression curve around Δt = 0 stems from cochlear dispersion and the well-known asymmetry of tonal suppression around the BF. Just as for two-tone suppression, BM responses to clicks are most suppressed by tones at frequencies just above the BF of the measurement location. On average, the frequency place of maximal suppressibility of the click response predicted from temporal-suppression data agrees with the frequency at which tonal suppression peaks, consistent with our hypothesis.

The Spatial Origins of Cochlear Amplification Assessed by Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions

Cochlear amplification of basilar membrane traveling waves is thought to occur between a tone's characteristic frequency (CF) place and within one octave basal of the CF. Evidence for this view comes only from the cochlear base. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) provide a noninvasive alternative to direct measurements of cochlear motion that can be measured across a wide range of CF regions. Coherent reflection theory indicates that SFOAEs arise mostly from the peak region of the traveling wave, but several studies using far-basal suppressor tones claimed that SFOAE components originate many octaves basal of CF. We measured SFOAEs while perfusing guinea pig cochleas from apex to base with salicylate or KCl solutions that reduced outer-hair-cell function and SFOAE amplification. Solution effects on inner hair cells reduced auditory nerve compound action potentials (CAPs) and provided reference times for when solutions reached the SFOAE-frequency CF region. As solution flowed from apex to base, SFOAE reductions generally occurred later than CAP reductions and showed that the effects of cochlear amplification usually peaked ∼1/2 octave basal of the CF region. For tones ≥2 kHz, cochlear amplification typically extended ∼1.5 octaves basal of CF, and the data are consistent with coherent reflection theory. SFOAE amplification did not extend to the basal end of the cochlea, even though reticular lamina motion is amplified in this region, which indicates that reticular lamina motion is not directly coupled to basilar membrane traveling waves. Previous reports of SFOAE-frequency residuals produced by suppressor frequencies far above the SFOAE frequency are most likely due to additional sources created by the suppressor. For some tones <2 kHz, SFOAE amplification extended two octaves apical of CF, which highlights that different vibratory motions produce SFOAEs and CAPs, and that the amplification region depends on the cochlear mode of motion considered. The concept that there is a single "cochlear amplification region" needs to be revised.

Cochlear Frequency Tuning and Otoacoustic Emissions

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) evoked from the inner ear are the barely audible, signature byproduct of the delicate hydromechanical amplifier that evolved within its bony walls. Compared to the sounds evoked from the ears of common laboratory animals, OAEs from human ears have exceptionally long delays, typically exceeding those of cats, guinea pigs, and chinchillas by a factor of two to three. This review asks "Why are human OAE delays so long?" and recounts efforts to locate answers in the characteristics of mechanical frequency selectivity in the inner ear. The road to understanding species differences in OAE delay leads to the identification of new invariances and to the emergence of new questions.

Using Cochlear Microphonic Potentials to Localize Peripheral Hearing Loss

The cochlear microphonic (CM) is created primarily by the receptor currents of outer hair cells (OHCs) and may therefore be useful for identifying cochlear regions with impaired OHCs. However, the CM measured across the frequency range with round-window or ear-canal electrodes lacks place-specificity as it is dominated by cellular sources located most proximal to the recording site (e.g., at the cochlear base). To overcome this limitation, we extract the "residual" CM (rCM), defined as the complex difference between the CM measured with and without an additional tone (saturating tone, ST). If the ST saturates receptor currents near the peak of its excitation pattern, then the rCM should reflect the activity of OHCs in that region. To test this idea, we measured round-window CMs in chinchillas in response to low-level probe tones presented alone or with an ST ranging from 1 to 2.6 times the probe frequency. CMs were measured both before and after inducing a local impairment in cochlear function (a 4-kHz notch-type acoustic trauma). Following the acoustic trauma, little change was observed in the probe-alone CM. In contrast, rCMs were reduced in a frequency-specific manner. When shifts in rCM levels were plotted vs. the ST frequency, they matched well the frequency range of shifts in neural thresholds. These results suggest that rCMs originate near the cochlear place tuned to the ST frequency and thus can be used to assess OHC function in that region. Our interpretation of the data is supported by predictions of a simple phenomenological model of CM generation and two-tone interactions. The model indicates that the sensitivity of rCM to acoustic trauma is governed by changes in cochlear response at the ST tonotopic place rather than at the probe place. The model also suggests that a combination of CM and rCM measurements could be used to assess both the site and etiology of sensory hearing loss in clinical applications.

Quasilinear reflection as a possible mechanism for suppressor-induced otoacoustic emission

A frequency-domain iterative approach is developed to compute the change in characteristic impedance in the cochlea due to the presence of a suppressor tone. Based on this approach, a small transient wave passing by the best place (BP) of the suppressor is predicted to be partially reflected because of the suppressor-induced impedance variation. This computational approach is tested on a nonlinear model of cochlear mechanics [Liu, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136, 1788-1796 (2014)]. When a 9-kHz suppressor at 60 dB sound pressure level is delivered to the model, the characteristic impedance decreases by ∼20% near its BP. This localized impedance mismatch causes a forward-going wave at 4 kHz to reflect partially, and the magnitude of the reflected component is about -18 dB relative to the forward-going component near the stapes. The reflected components eventually emit from the cochlea to the ear canal, and the predicted amplitude of tone-burst evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) agrees well with time-domain simulation. The present results suggest that, while the "suppressor" is meant to suppress the OAEs in experiments, its very presence might create an otherwise non-existing emission component via nonlinear scattering when its frequency is higher than that of the probe.

Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs

Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) are produced by cochlear irregularities reflecting energy from the peak region of the traveling wave (TW). Activation of medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents reduces cochlear amplification and otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). In other OAEs, MOC activation can produce enhancements. The extent of MOC enhancements of SFOAEs has not been previously studied. In anesthetized guinea pigs, we electrically stimulated MOC fibers and recorded their effects on SFOAEs. MOC stimulation mostly inhibited SFOAEs but sometimes enhanced them. Some enhancements were not near response dips and therefore cannot be explained by a reduction of wavelet cancelations. MOC stimulation always inhibited auditory-nerve compound action potentials showing that cochlear-amplifier gain was not increased. We propose that some SFOAE enhancements arise because shocks excite only a small number of MOC fibers that inhibit a few scattered outer hair cells thereby changing (perhaps increasing) cochlear irregularities and SFOAE amplitudes. Contralateral sound activation is expected to excite approximately one third of MOC efferents and may also change cochlear irregularities. Some papers suggest that large SFOAE components originate far basal of the TW peak, basal of the region that receives cochlear amplification. Using a time-frequency analysis, we separated SFOAEs into components with different latencies. At all SFOAE latencies, most SFOAE components were inhibited by MOC stimulation, but some were enhanced. The MOC inhibition of short-latency SFOAE components is consistent with these components being produced in the cochlear-amplified region near the TW peak.

The influence of probe level on the tuning of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions and behavioral test in human

Background

Frequency selectivity (FS) of the auditory system is established at the level of the cochlea and it is important for the perception of complex sounds. Although direct measurements of cochlear FS require surgical preparation, it can also be estimated with the measurements of otoacoustic emissions or behavioral tests, including stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves (SFOAE STCs) or psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs). These two methods result in similar estimates of FS at low probe levels. As the compressive nonlinearity of cochlea is strongly dependent on the stimulus intensity, the sharpness of tuning curves which is relevant to the cochlear nonlinearity will change as a function of probe level. The present study aims to investigate the influence of different probe levels on the relationship between SFOAE STCs and PTCs.

Methods

The study included 15 young subjects with normal hearing. SFOAE STCs and PTCs were recorded at low and moderate probe levels for frequencies centred at 1, 2, and 4 kHz. The ratio or the difference of the characteristic parameters between the two methods was calculated at each probe level. The effect of probe level on the ratio or the difference between the parameters of SFOAE STCs and PTCs was then statistically analysed.

Results

The tuning of SFOAE STCs was significantly positively correlated with the tuning of the PTCs at both low and moderate probe levels; yet, at the moderate probe level, the SFOAE STCs were consistently broader than the PTCs. The mean ratio of sharpness of tuning at low probe levels was constantly around 1 while around 1.5 at moderate probe levels.

Conclusions

Probe level had a significant effect on the sharpness of tuning between the two methods of estimating FS. SFOAE STC seems a good alternative measurement of PTC for FS assessment at low probe levels. At moderate probe levels, SFOAE STC and PTC were not equivalent measures of the FS in terms of their bandwidths. Because SFOAE STCs are not biased by higher levels auditory processing, they may represent cochlear FS better than PTCs.

Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Delays and Generating Mechanisms in Guinea Pigs, Chinchillas, and Simulations

According to coherent reflection theory (CRT), stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) arise from cochlear irregularities coherently reflecting energy from basilar membrane motion within the traveling-wave peak. This reflected energy arrives in the ear canal predominantly with a single delay at each frequency. However, data from humans and animals indicate that (1) SFOAEs can have multiple delay components, (2) low-frequency SFOAE delays are too short to be accounted for by CRT, and (3) "SFOAEs" obtained with a 2nd ("suppressor") tone ≥2 octaves above the probe tone have been interpreted as arising from the area basal to the region of cochlear amplification. To explore these issues, we collected SFOAEs by the suppression method in guinea pigs and time-frequency analyzed these data, simulated SFOAEs, and published chinchilla SFOAEs. Time-frequency analysis revealed that most frequencies showed only one SFOAE delay component while other frequencies had multiple components including some with short delays. We found no systematic patterns in the occurrence of multiple delay components. Using a cochlear model that had significant basilar membrane motion only in the peak region of the traveling wave, simulated SFOAEs had single and multiple delay components similar to the animal SFOAEs. This result indicates that multiple components (including ones with short delays) can originate from cochlear mechanical irregularities in the SFOAE peak region and are not necessarily indicative of SFOAE sources in regions ≥2 octaves basal of the SFOAE peak region. We conclude that SFOAEs obtained with suppressors close to the probe frequency provide information primarily about the mechanical response in the region that receives amplification, and we attribute the too-short SFOAE delays at low frequencies to distortion-source SFOAEs and coherent reflection from multiple cochlear motions. Our findings suggest that CRT needs revision to include reflections from multiple motions in the cochlear apex.

Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) appear to be well suited for assessing frequency selectivity because, at least on theoretical grounds, they originate over a restricted region of the cochlea near the characteristic place of the evoking tone. In support of this view, we previously found good agreement between SFOAE suppression tuning curves (SF-STCs) and a control measure of frequency selectivity (compound action potential suppression tuning curves (CAP-STC)) for frequencies above 3 kHz in chinchillas. For lower frequencies, however, SF-STCs and were over five times broader than the CAP-STCs and demonstrated more high-pass rather than narrow band-pass filter characteristics. Here, we test the hypothesis that the broad tuning of low-frequency SF-STCs is because emissions originate over a broad region of the cochlea extending basal to the characteristic place of the evoking tone. We removed contributions of the hypothesized basally located SFOAE sources by either pre-suppressing them with a high-frequency interference tone (IT; 4.2, 6.2, or 9.2 kHz at 75 dB sound pressure level (SPL)) or by inducing acoustic trauma at high frequencies (exposures to 8, 5, and lastly 3-kHz tones at 110-115 dB SPL). The 1-kHz SF-STCs and CAP-STCs were measured for baseline, IT present and following the acoustic trauma conditions in anesthetized chinchillas. The IT and acoustic trauma affected SF-STCs in an almost indistinguishable way. The SF-STCs changed progressively from a broad high-pass to narrow band-pass shape as the frequency of the IT was lowered and for subsequent exposures to lower-frequency tones. Both results were in agreement with the "basal sources" hypothesis. In contrast, CAP-STCs were not changed by either manipulation, indicating that neither the IT nor acoustic trauma affected the 1-kHz characteristic place. Thus, unlike CAPs, SFOAEs cannot be considered as a place-specific measure of cochlear function at low frequencies, at least in chinchillas.