Relation Between Cochlear Mechanics and Performance of Temporal Fine Structure-Based Tasks

Sensitivity to Frequency Modulation is Limited Centrally

Modulations in both amplitude and frequency are prevalent in natural sounds and are critical in defining their properties. Humans are exquisitely sensitive to frequency modulation (FM) at the slow modulation rates and low carrier frequencies that are common in speech and music. This enhanced sensitivity to slow-rate and low-frequency FM has been widely believed to reflect precise, stimulus-driven phase locking to temporal fine structure in the auditory nerve. At faster modulation rates and/or higher carrier frequencies, FM is instead thought to be coded by coarser frequency-to-place mapping, where FM is converted to amplitude modulation (AM) via cochlear filtering. Here, we show that patterns of human FM perception that have classically been explained by limits in peripheral temporal coding are instead better accounted for by constraints in the central processing of fundamental frequency (F0) or pitch. We measured FM detection in male and female humans using harmonic complex tones with an F0 within the range of musical pitch but with resolved harmonic components that were all above the putative limits of temporal phase locking (>8 kHz). Listeners were more sensitive to slow than fast FM rates, even though all components were beyond the limits of phase locking. In contrast, AM sensitivity remained better at faster than slower rates, regardless of carrier frequency. These findings demonstrate that classic trends in human FM sensitivity, previously attributed to auditory nerve phase locking, may instead reflect the constraints of a unitary code that operates at a more central level of processing.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Natural sounds involve dynamic frequency and amplitude fluctuations. Humans are particularly sensitive to frequency modulation (FM) at slow rates and low carrier frequencies, which are prevalent in speech and music. This sensitivity has been ascribed to encoding of stimulus temporal fine structure (TFS) via phase-locked auditory nerve activity. To test this long-standing theory, we measured FM sensitivity using complex tones with a low F0 but only high-frequency harmonics beyond the limits of phase locking. Dissociating the F0 from TFS showed that FM sensitivity is limited not by peripheral encoding of TFS but rather by central processing of F0, or pitch. The results suggest a unitary code for FM detection limited by more central constraints.

The role of cochlear place coding in the perception of frequency modulation

Natural sounds convey information via frequency and amplitude modulations (FM and AM). Humans are acutely sensitive to the slow rates of FM that are crucial for speech and music. This sensitivity has long been thought to rely on precise stimulus-driven auditory-nerve spike timing (time code), whereas a coarser code, based on variations in the cochlear place of stimulation (place code), represents faster FM rates. We tested this theory in listeners with normal and impaired hearing, spanning a wide range of place-coding fidelity. Contrary to predictions, sensitivity to both slow and fast FM correlated with place-coding fidelity. We also used incoherent AM on two carriers to simulate place coding of FM and observed poorer sensitivity at high carrier frequencies and fast rates, two properties of FM detection previously ascribed to the limits of time coding. The results suggest a unitary place-based neural code for FM across all rates and carrier frequencies.

Relationship between cochlear mechanics and speech-in-noise reception performance

Some normal-hearing listeners report difficulties in speech perception in noisy environments, and the cause is not well understood. The present study explores the correlation between speech-in-noise reception performance and cochlear mechanical characteristics, which were evaluated using a principal component analysis of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) spectra. A principal component, specifically a characteristic dip at around 2-2.5 kHz in OAE spectra, correlated with speech reception thresholds in noise but not in quiet. The results suggest that subclinical cochlear dysfunction specifically contributes to difficulties in speech perception in noisy environments, which is possibly a new form of "hidden hearing deficits."

The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss

Substantial loss of cochlear function is required to elevate pure-tone thresholds to the severe hearing loss range; yet, individuals with severe or profound hearing loss continue to rely on hearing for communication. Despite the impairment, sufficient information is encoded at the periphery to make acoustic hearing a viable option. However, the probability of significant cochlear and/or neural damage associated with the loss has consequences for sound perception and speech recognition. These consequences include degraded frequency selectivity, which can be assessed with tests including psychoacoustic tuning curves and broadband rippled stimuli. Because speech recognition depends on the ability to resolve frequency detail, a listener with severe hearing loss is likely to have impaired communication in both quiet and noisy environments. However, the extent of the impairment varies widely among individuals. A better understanding of the fundamental abilities of listeners with severe and profound hearing loss and the consequences of those abilities for communication can support directed treatment options in this population.

Assessing the Role of Place and Timing Cues in Coding Frequency and Amplitude Modulation as a Function of Age

Natural sounds can be characterized by their fluctuations in amplitude and frequency. Ageing may affect sensitivity to some forms of fluctuations more than others. The present study used individual differences across a wide age range (20-79 years) to test the hypothesis that slow-rate, low-carrier frequency modulation (FM) is coded by phase-locked auditory-nerve responses to temporal fine structure (TFS), whereas fast-rate FM is coded via rate-place (tonotopic) cues, based on amplitude modulation (AM) of the temporal envelope after cochlear filtering. Using a low (500 Hz) carrier frequency, diotic FM and AM detection thresholds were measured at slow (1 Hz) and fast (20 Hz) rates in 85 listeners. Frequency selectivity and TFS coding were assessed using forward masking patterns and interaural phase disparity tasks (slow dichotic FM), respectively. Comparable interaural level disparity tasks (slow and fast dichotic AM and fast dichotic FM) were measured to control for effects of binaural processing not specifically related to TFS coding. Thresholds in FM and AM tasks were correlated, even across tasks thought to use separate peripheral codes. Age was correlated with slow and fast FM thresholds in both diotic and dichotic conditions. The relationship between age and AM thresholds was generally not significant. Once accounting for AM sensitivity, only diotic slow-rate FM thresholds remained significantly correlated with age. Overall, results indicate stronger effects of age on FM than AM. However, because of similar effects for both slow and fast FM when not accounting for AM sensitivity, the effects cannot be unambiguously ascribed to TFS coding.