The primary headaches: genetics, epigenetics and a behavioural genetic model

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and psychostimulant use in patients seeking dental care-Associations with common orofacial pain complaints

BACKGROUND

Dental medicine should expand its scope to properly assess medical and psychosocial factors that might have an impact on patients' oral health. Based on previous literature and clinical experience, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and psychostimulant medications might represent factors associated with orofacial pain symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess whether common orofacial pain complaints such as jaw pain, jaw clicking, teeth clenching and headaches are more prevalent in dental patients who have an ADHD diagnosis and/or use psychostimulant medications.

METHODS

Orofacial pain symptoms prevalence was compared among four groups from a sample of new patients seeking dental care at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (n = 11 699) based on ADHD diagnosis and psychostimulants intake: G1: no ADHD, no stimulants; G2: yes ADHD, yes stimulants; G3: yes ADHD, no stimulants; G4: no ADHD, yes stimulants.

RESULTS

In multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, tobacco use, and alcohol consumption, significant differences were found for clenching (p < .0001), jaw pain (p < .0001), and headache (p < .0001). Compared to G1, two groups (G2 and G4) exhibited significantly higher odds of clenching and headaches, whereas only G2 exhibited significantly higher odds of jaw pain.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with patients without ADHD and not taking psychostimulants medications, dental patients using psychostimulants with and without ADHD diagnosis report headaches and teeth clenching more frequently, while jaw pain is reported more frequently only by those taking psychostimulants with an ADHD diagnosis. Further research is necessary to assess the nature of these associations and their clinical relevance.

DNA-methylation and immunological response in medication overuse headache

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether medication-overuse headache patients have differential DNA-methylation pattern.

METHODS

We collected blood samples from 120 medication-overuse headache-patients, 57 controls (29 episodic migraine patients and 28 healthy controls) in a hypothesis-generating cross-sectional case-control pilot study; 100 of the medication-overuse headache-patients were followed for six months and samples were collected at two and six months for the longitudinal methylation analyses. Blood cell proportions of leucocytes (neutrophils, NK-cells, monocytes, CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells, and B-cells) and the neutrophile-lymphocyte ratio were estimated using methylation data as a measure for immunological analysis and a cell type-specific epigenome wide association study was conducted between medication-overuse headache-patients and controls, and longitudinally for reduction in headache days/month among medication-overuse headache-patients.

RESULTS

We found a higher neutrophile-lymphocyte ratio in medication-overuse headache-patients compared to controls, indicating a higher immunological response in medication-overuse headache-patients (false discovery rate (adjusted p-value)<0.001). Reduction in headache days/month (9.8; 95% CI 8.1-11.5) was associated with lower neutrophile-lymphocyte ratio (false discovery rate adjusted p-value = 0.041).Three genes (CORIN, CCKBR and CLDN9) were hypermethylated in specific cell types in medication-overuse headache-patients compared to controls. No methylation differences were associated with reduction in headache days in medication-overuse headache-patients after six months.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study was consistent with higher immunological response in medication-overuse headache-patients which decreased with a reduction in headache days in longitudinal analysis. medication-overuse headache-patients exhibited differential methylation in innate immune cells but did not exhibit longitudinal differences with alterations in headache days. Our study creates hypotheses for further biomarker searches.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02993289.

Inflammation and histone modification in chronic pain

Increasing evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms have great potential in the field of pain. The changes and roles of epigenetics of the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia in the chronic pain process may provide broad insights for future pain management. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines released by microglia and astrocytes, as well as blood-derived macrophages, play critical roles in inducing and maintaining chronic pain, while histone modifications may play an important role in inflammatory metabolism. This review provides an overview of neuroinflammation and chronic pain, and we systematically discuss the regulation of neuroinflammation and histone modifications in the context of chronic pain. Specifically, we analyzed the role of epigenetics in alleviating or exacerbating chronic pain by modulating microglia, astrocytes, and the proinflammatory mediators they release. This review aimed to contribute to the discovery of new therapeutic targets for chronic pain.

Alleviative effects of Cannabis flower on migraine and headache

OBJECTIVE

Few studies to date have measured the real-time effects of consumption of common and commercially available Cannabis products for the treatment of headache and migraine under naturalistic conditions. This study examines, for the first time, the effectiveness of using dried Cannabis flower, the most widely used type of Cannabis product in the United States, in actual time for treatment of headache- and migraine-related pain and the associations between different product characteristics and changes in symptom intensity following Cannabis use.

METHODS

Between 06/10/2016 and 02/12/2019, 699 people used the Releaf Application to record real-time details of their Cannabis use, including product characteristics and symptom intensity levels prior to and following self-administration; data included 1910 session-level attempts to treat headache- (1328 sessions) or migraine-related pain (582 sessions). Changes in headache- or migraine-related pain intensity were measured on a 0-10 scale prior to, and immediately, following Cannabis consumption.

RESULTS

Ninety-four percent of users experienced symptom relief within a two-hour observation window. The average symptom intensity reduction was 3.3 points on a 0-10 scale (standard deviation = 2.28, Cohen's d = 1.58), with males experiencing greater relief than females (P < 0.001) and a trend that younger users (< 35 years) experience greater relief than older users (P = 0.08). Mixed effects regression models showed that, among the known (i.e., labeled) product characteristics, tetrahydrocannabinol levels 10% and higher are the strongest independent predictors of symptom relief, and this effect is particularly prominent in headache rather than migraine sufferers (P < 0.05), females (P < 0.05) and younger users (P < 0.001). Females and younger users also appear to gain greater symptom relief from flower labeled as "C. indica" rather than "C. sativa" or other hybrid strains.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that whole dried Cannabis flower may be an effective medication for treatment of migraine- and headache-related pain, but the effectiveness differs according to characteristics of the Cannabis plant, the combustion methods, and the age and gender of the patient.

Electrophysiological Characteristics of the Migraine Brain: Current Knowledge and Perspectives

BACKGROUND

Despite pain being its most prominent feature, migraine is primarily a disorder of sensory processing. Electrophysiology-based research in the field has consistently developed over the last fifty years.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current knowledge on the electrophysiological characteristics of the migraine brain, and discuss perspectives.

METHODS

We critically reviewed the literature on the topic to present and discuss articles selected on the basis of their significance and/or novelty.

RESULTS

Physiologic fluctuations within time, between-subject differences, and methodological issues account as major limitations of electrophysiological research in migraine. Nonetheless, several abnormalities revealed through different approaches have been described in the literature. Altogether, these results are compatible with an abnormal state of sensory processing.

PERSPECTIVES

The greatest contribution of electrophysiological testing in the future will most probably be the characterization of sub-groups of migraine patients sharing specific electrophysiological traits. This should serve as strategy towards personalized migraine treatment. Incorporation of novel methods of analysis would be worthwhile.

Molecular analysis of cluster headache

OBJECTIVES

Cluster headache (CH) is characterized by severe, recurrent, unilateral attacks of extreme intensity and brief duration. Variants in a myriad of genes were studied in sporadic CH patients, often with conflicting results.

METHODS

We studied gene mutations in some candidate genes, hypocretin receptor 2, Clock, and alcohol dehydrogenase 4 (ADH4), in 54 unrelated sporadic CH patients and in 200 controls in 8 kindreds/families that included more affected and nonaffected cases. Furthermore, we performed the whole-genome scanning by comparative genomic hybridization, searching for rearrangements associated with DNA gain or loss in a subset of sporadic and familial CH and control participants.

RESULTS

The analysis of candidate genes revealed that only allele and genotype frequency of the 2 ADH4 mutations resulted significantly between sporadic CH and controls; the same mutations were homozygous in CH patients from 2 families. The comparative genomic hybridization analysis revealed 2 novel rearrangements that involved the intron regions of thyrotropin-releasing hormone-degrading enzyme and neurexin 3 (NRXN3) genes, respectively. The first arrangement was present either in CH or in controls, whereas the second one was specifically found in some sporadic and familial CH cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data (although obtained on a small number of cases) confirm the genetic heterogeneity of CH, suggesting that mutations in the ADH4 gene and a novel rearrangement involving NRXN3 gene might be related to CH in a subset of cases.

Antifolates and MTHFR

We describe a patient who developed symptoms of headache, fatigue, and dizziness after administration of terbinafine (Lamisil). Laboratory tests revealed that he is heterozygous for the C677T variation of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genetic mutation. The prescription of Deplin (L-methylfolate) greatly reduced the symptoms. It was later noted that Lamisil's mechanism of action interferes with cells' methylation cycle, which we suspect compromises cellular function in people with the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genetic mutation.

Anatomical Variants of the Circle of Willis and Brain Lesions in Migraineurs

Background:

Some reports demonstrated vascular alterations in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in migraineurs and a relationship between circle of Willis (Circle) variants and lacunar brain infarcts. We examined anomalies of the whole circle of Willis and their relationship with vascular brain lesions in migraineurs, to identify any possible vascular mechanism in migraine.

Methods:

We studied, with a cohort controlled study, the circle of Willis in migraineurs seen consecutively in our Headache Center, and in non-headache controls, using angio-MRI of the brain. Statistical analysis used ANOVA, Scheffè's criterion, t-student test.

Results:

We recruited 270 migraineurs (204 without aura (MWOA), 66 with aura (MWA) and 159 controls. Migraineurs presented an anatomical variant in 108 (40%) cases with 34 controls (21.4%) presenting a variant. We found a significant association between MWOA and variants (OR=2.4 CI95% [1.5 to 3.9]) and between MWA and variants (OR=3.2 CI95% [1.6 to 4.1]). Unilateral posterior variants with basilar hypoplasia are statistically associated only with MWA compared to controls (OR=9.2, CI95% [2.3 to 37.2]). Thirty-three percent of MWOA and 24% of MWA sufferers present some kind of brain lesion, included 2% of infra-tentorial lesions. We did not find any statistical association between the presence of Circle variants and ischemic lesions on MRI (OR=1.5 CI95% [0.68; 1.94]), or with infratentorial lacunar lesions (OR=1.58 CI95% [0.48 to 5.24]).

Conclusions:

Anatomical variants of the Circle of Willis are significantly more frequent in migraineurs; posterior anomalies are more frequent in MWA, suggesting a vascular mechanism provoking changes in cerebral blood flow, thereby stimulating cortical spreading depression.

Biomarkers associated with migraine and their potential role in migraine management

OBJECTIVE

The focus of this review is to review potential diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers associated with migraine.

BACKGROUND

Migraine headache is a common disease that affects millions of individuals worldwide. Although well-accepted diagnostic criteria exist for migraine, it is still a complex disorder that remains both underdiagnosed and misdiagnosed. The causes of migraine are likely a mix of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors that, together with the individual's life history, translate into the observed clinical heterogeneity. Inherent clinical heterogeneity is an obstacle in developing more effective treatments. The lack of appropriate biomarkers is also an impediment to developing more effective therapeutic/preventive approaches. Ultimately, biomarkers may facilitate the goal of individualized medicine by enabling clinicians to more accurately diagnose and treat migraine and other types of headache.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted of PubMed citations containing the key word "marker" OR "biomarker" combined with "migraine" OR "headache." Other key words included "serum," "saliva," "cerebrospinal fluid," "genes," "blood," and "inflammation." The only restriction was English-language publication. The abstracts of all articles meeting these criteria were reviewed, and full text was retrieved and examined for relevant references.

RESULTS

Data from human studies have begun to identify genetic mutations/polymorphisms and altered levels of specific proinflammatory and neuromodulatory molecules that strongly correlate with migraine as well as symptom severity. Results from a smaller number of studies have identified parameters, such as the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which are significantly associated with response to specific treatments for acute migraine attacks and prophylaxis. Epigenetic mechanisms may also be involved in the development of migraine, and understanding environmentally induced genetic changes associated with this disease may eventually guide the development of therapies capable of reversing these pathophysiological changes in gene function.

CONCLUSIONS

The understanding of the etiology of migraine is incomplete. Although the identification and validation of biomarkers has greatly advanced diagnostic precision and measures of therapeutic efficacy in other diseases, there are no currently accepted biomarkers for chronic or episodic migraine. However, the continued investigation and identification of genetic, epigenetic, and molecular biomarkers is likely to facilitate the goal of individualizing medicine by enabling clinicians to more accurately diagnose and treat migraine and other headache disorders.

Migraine genetics--a review: Part I

Significant progress in molecular genetics has advanced our understanding of the genetic basis of migraine. The fundamentals of molecular genetics, and the recent advances in the field, are important for clinicians to understand, as they provide a foundation for critical appraisal of the literature, unprecedented insights into the pathogenesis of the disorder, and reveal promising treatment targets for future drug development. This paper provides a primer of molecular genetics and will be followed by a companion paper on the genetic advances in migraine, the methodology of genome wide association studies, and the potential clinical implications.

Chronic opioid use is associated with increased DNA methylation correlating with increased clinical pain

Environmentally caused changes in chromosomes that do not alter the DNA sequence but cause phenotypic changes by altering gene transcription are summarized as epigenetics. A major epigenetic mechanism is methylation or demethylation at CpG-rich DNA islands. DNA methylation triggered by drugs has largely unexplored therapeutic consequences. Here we report increased methylation at a CpG rich island in the OPRM1 gene coding for μ-opioid receptors and at a global methylation site (LINE-1) in leukocytes of methadone-substituted former opiate addicts compared with matched healthy controls. Higher DNA methylation associated with chronic opioid exposure was reproduced in an independent cohort of opioid-treated as compared to non-opioid-treated pain patients. This suggests that opioids may stimulate DNA methylation. The OPRM1 methylation had no immediate effect on μ-opioid receptor transcription and was not associated with opioid dosing requirements. However, the global DNA methylation at LINE-1 was significantly correlated with increased chronic pain. This suggests inhibitory effects on the transcription of still unspecified nocifensive gene products. It further implies that opioids may be causally associated with increased genome-wide DNA methylation, although currently there is no direct evidence of this. This has phenotypic consequences for pain and may provide a new, epigenetics-associated mechanism of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. The results indicate a potential influence of opioid analgesics on the patients' epigenome. They emphasize the need for reliable and cost-effective screening tools and may imply that high-throughput screening for lead compounds in artificial expression systems may not provide the best tools for identifying new pain medications.

Pain stress and headache

The association between pain and stress is an old one, but still it is not really clear who comes first. Pain induces stress, and stress induces pain. Pain is part of our homeostatic system and in this way is an emotion, i.e., it tells us that something is out-of-order (control), and emotion drives our behavior and one behavior is stress response. Stress comes from ourselves: the imagination we have or would like to have of us, from the image others give of us, from the goals we assume it is necessary to reach for our well-being or the goals others want us to fulfill. Stress comes from our social condition and the condition we would like, stress comes from dangerous situations we cannot control. Headache easily fits in the picture.

Epigenetics and the transition from acute to chronic pain

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review the epigenetic modifications involved in the transition from acute to chronic pain and to identify potential targets for the development of novel, individualized pain therapeutics.

BACKGROUND

Epigenetics is the study of heritable modifications in gene expression and phenotype that do not require a change in genetic sequence to manifest their effects. Environmental toxins, medications, diet, and psychological stresses can alter epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation, histone acetylation, and RNA interference. As epigenetic modifications potentially play an important role in inflammatory cytokine metabolism, steroid responsiveness, and opioid sensitivity, they are likely key factors in the development of chronic pain. Although our knowledge of the human genetic code and disease-associated polymorphisms has grown significantly in the past decade, we have not yet been able to elucidate the mechanisms that lead to the development of persistent pain after nerve injury or surgery.

DESIGN

This is a focused literature review of epigenetic science and its relationship to chronic pain.

RESULTS

Significant laboratory and clinical data support the notion that epigenetic modifications are affected by the environment and lead to differential gene expression. Similar to mechanisms involved in the development of cancer, neurodegenerative disease, and inflammatory disorders, the literature endorses an important potential role for epigenetics in chronic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Epigenetic analysis may identify mechanisms critical to the development of chronic pain after injury, and may provide new pathways and target mechanisms for future drug development and individualized medicine.

Genetic TPH2 variants and the susceptibility for migraine: association of a TPH2 haplotype with migraine without aura

The serotonergic system plays a major role in the etiology of migraine. The rate-limiting enzyme in serotonin homeostasis and availability is tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH). The TPH2 isoform is responsible for the cerebral serotonin biosynthesis. To investigate the role of genetic variation in TPH2 in the pathogenesis of migraine eight haplotype tagging SNPs covering the whole TPH2 gene where chosen using Haploview and genotyped in 503 migraineurs and 515 healthy controls. Association analysis was performed on a single SNP and haplotype basis using χ² and logistic regression analysis. Single SNP analysis revealed a weak association with migraine, which did not remain after correction for multiple testing. Haplotype analyses revealed association of a haplotype with migraine without aura. Stratification by aura and triptan response did not reveal a positive association with the investigated polymorphisms. These results suggest a possible influence of genetic variation in TPH2 in the pathogenesis of migraine.

Tumour necrosis factor gene polymorphisms and migraine in Greek children

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is considered to be a multifactorial, complex disease. Various genetic and environmental factors contribute to the manifestation of this disease. The aim of this study was to determine whether polymorphisms in the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) region are associated with the risk of migraine. We examined the association between 6 single nucleotide polymorphisms in the coding regions of TNF-α and TNF-β genes and migraine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included two groups of children (group A and group B). Group A consisted of 103 unrelated children with typical migraine without aura 5-14 years of age. Group B (control group) consisted of 178 unrelated healthy children. The diagnosis of migraine was, in all patients, made according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD II).

RESULTS

According to our results positive family history was present in 62.2% of patients of group A. No significant differences were found in the frequencies of genotypes or alleles between patients and controls. The non-parametric analyses of variance showed no significant differences in the age at onset between genotype groups of the TNF-α and TNF-β gene polymorphisms. Comparison of genotype frequencies between boys and girls in affected patients and control individuals were not significantly different (p = 0.089, p =0.073 respectively). The distribution of TNF polymorphisms was not associated with the presence of family history of migraine in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that TNF-α and TNF-β gene polymorphisms are not a significant risk factor for migraine without aura in Greek children.

Lack of association between five serotonin metabolism-related genes and medication overuse headache

Serotonin is involved in several central nervous system functions including pain threshold, mood regulation and drug reward. Overuse of acute medications is commonly identified as a causative factor for medication overuse headache (MOH). Apparently, MOH shares with other kinds of drug addiction some common neurobiological pathways. The objective of this study is to assess the role of serotonin metabolism genes in the genetic liability to MOH. We performed a genetic association study using polymorphisms of five serotonin metabolism-related genes: serotonin transporter (5HTT), serotonin receptor 1A (5-HT1A), serotonin receptor 1B (5-HT1B), serotonin receptor 2A (5-HT2A) and serotonin receptor 6 (5HT6) genes. We compared 138 patients with MOH with a control sample of 117 individuals without headache and without drug overuse, and with 101 patients with migraine without aura but without drug overuse (MO). The genotypic and allelic distributions of all polymorphisms investigated did not differ among the three groups. In conclusion, our study does not provide evidence that the 5HTT, 5-HT1A, 5HT1B, 5HT2A and 5HT6 gene polymorphisms play a role in the genetic predisposition to MOH.

Headache-type adverse effects of NO donors: vasodilation and beyond

Although nitrate therapy, used in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, is frequently associated with side-effects, mainly headaches, the summaries of product characteristics of nitrate-containing medicines do not report detailed description of headaches and even do not highlight the possibility of nitrate-induced migraine. Two different types of nitrate-induced headaches have been described: (i) immediate headaches that develop within the first hour of the application, are mild or medium severity without characteristic symptoms for migraine, and ease spontaneously; and (ii) delayed, moderate or severe migraine-type headaches (occurring mainly in subjects with personal or family history of migraine), that develop 3-6 h after the intake of nitrates, with debilitating, long-lasting symptoms including nausea, vomiting, photo- and/or phono-phobia. These two types of headaches are remarkably different, not only in their timing and symptoms, but also in the persons who are at risk. Recent studies provide evidence that the two headache types are caused by different mechanisms: immediate headaches are connected to vasodilation caused by nitric oxide (NO) release, while migraines are triggered by other actions such as the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide or glutamate, or changes in ion channel function mediated by cyclic guanosine monophosphate or S-nitrosylation. Migraines usually need anti-attack medication, such as triptans, but these drugs are contraindicated in most medical conditions that are treated using nitrates. In conclusion, these data recommend the correction of summaries of nitrate product characteristics, and also suggest a need to develop new types of anti-migraine drugs, effective in migraine attacks, that could be used in patients with risk for angina pectoris.

Headache diagnosis, disability and co-morbidities in a multi-ethnic, heterogeneous paediatric Asian population

This was a questionnaire survey on headache and migraine prevalence in 2873 Singaporean schoolchildren aged 6 to 16 years. ICHD-II headache classification, disability assessment with PedMIDAS and screening of psychosocial co-morbidities with the Paediatric Symptom Checklist were conducted. Lifetime headache prevalence was high at 80.6%, migraine prevalence was 8.6% and tension headache prevalence was 10.0%. Headache and migraine prevalence was high compared with that found in other Asian studies. Factors significantly associated with headache included adolescent age (OR = 1.5 [95% CI 1.3–1.9], p < .001), female gender at primary (OR = 1.4 [95% CI 1.1–1.8], p = .003) and secondary (OR = 1.8 [95% CI 1.3–2.5], p < .001) levels and Malay ethnicity at the primary level (OR = 2.8 [95% CI 1.6–4.9], p < .001). The average PedMIDAS score for headache disability was 3.2 ± 8.4, and migraine disability (PedMIDAS 8.1 ± 11.2–15.2 ± 29.6) was lower than in some studies. Self-medication (20.5%) and use of alternative therapy (59.0%) were high among chronic daily headache sufferers. Routine sleep and stress screening is recommended for children with headaches. Recognition of the influence of genetics, lifestyle and cultural factors on headache management should be emphasized.

The primary headaches as a reflection of genetic darwinian adaptive behavioral responses

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to present a view of the primary headaches as genetically determined behavioral responses consistent with sickness behavior and defense reaction, respectively.

BACKGROUND AND DESIGN

A review of the literature bearing on the behavioral, humoral, and functional imaging aspects of the primary headaches shows that migraine and cluster headache (CH) are pain conditions characterized by different behaviors during the attacks. Here it is postulated that the behavioral responses to migraine and CH are evolutionary conserved reactions consistent with sickness behavior and defense reaction.

RESULTS

The sickness behavior observed during migraine attacks is a pan-mammalian adaptive response to internal and external stressors, characterized by withdrawal and motor quiescence, sympatho-inhibition and lethargy, in which visceral pain signals a homeostatic imbalance of the body and/or brain. In contrast, the defense reaction in CH consists of a fight-or-flight reaction, with motor restlessness and agitation, in which pain is exteroceptive in kind.

CONCLUSION

These different behavioral responses are thus specific to different kinds of pain, distinguished by the behavioral significance of the pain (visceral pain in migraine vs exteroceptive pain in CH), and imply brain matrices involving different networks in the brainstem, hypothalamus, and forebrain regions that engender evolutionarily conserved adaptive genetic responses. Cytokines play an important role in their development. Predictions and limitations of the hypothesis are discussed together with implications for genetic studies on headaches.

[What is migraine?]

Migraine is a multifactorial and heterogeneous disorder. Diagnostic criteria have been established by the International Headache Society, however these are only supportive in terms of definition. The pathophysiology involves neuronal and vascular phenomena. The former is supported by the cortical spreading depression being the aura correlate and by brainstem and hypothalamic activation during the pain phase; the latter is suggested by the association between migraine and cardiovascular disease and findings of pathological vasoreactivity and endothelial dysfunction. Triptans and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists show only a relative migraine-specific action; up to 30% of patients are nonresponders. Despite a clear genetic component, the discovery of specific genes for common forms of migraine remains elusive. Electrophysiological studies consistently indicate a characteristic "dyshabituation" concurring with clinical features of altered sensory perception. The age- and sex-specific pattern along with the effect of external factors on the course of migraine argue in favor of the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms. Knowledge about migraine is still limited, which hampers a definition.

Molecular genetics of migraine

Migraine is an episodic neurovascular disorder that is clinically divided into two main subtypes that are based on the absence or presence of an aura: migraine without aura (MO) and migraine with aura (MA). Current molecular genetic insight into the pathophysiology of migraine predominantly comes from studies of a rare monogenic subtype of migraine with aura called familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM). Three FHM genes have been identified, which all encode ion transporters, suggesting that disturbances in ion and neurotransmitter balances in the brain are responsible for this migraine type, and possibly the common forms of migraine. Cellular and animal models expressing FHM mutations hint toward neuronal hyperexcitability as the likely underlying disease mechanism. Additional molecular insight into the pathophysiology of migraine may come from other monogenic syndromes (for instance cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy, which is caused by NOTCH3 mutations), in which migraine is prominent. Investigating patients with common forms of migraine has had limited successes. Except for 5',10'-methylenetetrahydrolate reductase, an enzyme in folate metabolism, the large majority of reported genetic associations with candidate migraine genes have not been convincingly replicated. Genetic linkage studies using migraine subtypes as an end diagnosis did not yield gene variants thus far. Clinical heterogeneity in migraine diagnosis may have hampered the identification of such variants. Therefore, the recent introduction of more refined methods of phenotyping, such as latent-class analysis and trait component analysis, may be certainly helpful. Combining the new phenotyping methods with genome-wide association studies may be a successful strategy toward identification of migraine susceptibility genes. Likely the identification of reliable biomarkers for migraine diagnosing will make these efforts even more successful.

Migraine: where and how does the pain originate?

Migraine is a complex neurological disease with a genetic background. Headache is the most prominent and clinically important symptom of migraine but its origin is still enigmatic. Numerous clinical, histochemical, electrophysiological, molecular and genetical approaches form a puzzle of findings that slowly takes shape. The generation of primary headaches like migraine pain seems to be the consequence of multiple pathophysiological changes in meningeal tissues, the trigeminal ganglion, trigeminal brainstem nuclei and descending inhibitory systems, based on specific characteristics of the trigeminovascular system. This contribution reviews the current discussion of where and how the migraine pain may originate and outlines the experimental work to answer these questions.

Familial vasovagal syncope associated with migraine

Syncope affects all age groups and is characterized by a brief sudden loss of consciousness followed by fast recovery. Vasovagal syncope, the most common type, is generally assumed to be due to venous pooling and an abnormal sympathetic response. In approximately 20% of cases, more than one family member is affected. Vasovagal syncope has been documented in a high proportion of patients with migraine. Three generations of a family with comorbid vasovagal syncope and migraine are described. Data were collected from the medical files (index patient and eight siblings) and interviews with the patient's mother. Information was available for 21 family members. Eleven of the 14 family members with a diagnosis of migraine (78%) also had vasovagal syncope, and 11 of the 12 family members with vasovagal syncope (92%) also had migraine. Age at first episode of syncope ranged from 2 to 7 years; age at first migraine headache was less than 10 years in most cases. The high incidence rates combined with the lack of gender predominance may point to a possible common pathophysiology of the two disorders and, perhaps, an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. Further investigations are needed to corroborate a genetic link.

Migraine genetics

Migraine with aura (MA) and migraine without aura (MO) are primary headaches prevalent in the general population that carry a substantial familial liability. Based on the model of migraine as a complex disease, a multifactorial type of inheritance has been suggested, but familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM), classified as a subtype of MA, shows an autosomal dominant transmission pattern and is due to mutations in three genes encoding for neural channel subunits. These FHM mutations, however, account for a minority of the FHM families and are not usually found in sporadic HM or in the typical migraines MA/MO. This implies that the genetic predisposition to the typical migraines may be different and that FHM could be better classified as a type of syndromic migraine rather than a MA subtype. Linkage and genome-wide scans have disclosed several chromosomal liability loci in selected families with MA/MO. It is likely that typical migraine genes will be discovered in the future. Epigenetic mechanisms, especially those acting in the early stages of neural development, are here proposed to be involved in the genetics of the typical migraines, especially if the typical migraines are modeled as evolutionarily conserved behaviors (sickness behavior) enacted out of a genetic repertoire.

Migraine: a genetic disease?

Migraines carry a substantial genetic liability, and in families affected with the typical migraines (migraine with, MA, and without aura, MO) linkage to some chromosomal loci has been reported. As yet however, no genes are known for MA/MO, while the three genes discovered as responsible for familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) are not involved in the typical migraines. Accordingly, we propose to consider FHM as a syndromic migraine and not as a variety of MA. Moreover, we suggest that epigenetic mechanisms play a role in the determination of the typical migraines, and that the primary headaches represent behavioural responses (sickness behaviour, fight-or-flight responses), having adaptive advantage and having been evolutionary conserved, in which pain represents a signal of homeostatic imbalance. Epigenetic mechanisms and this proposed genetic behavioural model could be usefully incorporated into headache genetic research.

Serotonin and migraine: a reconsideration of the central theory

The 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) has been implicated in migraine pathophysiology for the past 50 years. A low central 5-HT disposition associated with an increase in 5-HT release during attack is the most convincing change of 5-HT metabolism implicated in migraine. Peripheral studies on plasma/platelet have not generally shown low 5-HT levels. Studies on 5-HT reactivity showed hypersensitivity, also expressed as reduced tachyphylaxis (habituation), which successively was evidenced as the most characteristic marker of an altered sensory neurotransmission. Even the gender and seasonal variations of 5-HT parameters seem to agree with a low 5-HT turnover with receptoral hypersensitivity. The interpretation of the effects of some serotonergic drugs and recent neuroimaging studies give major evidence for this cascade of events. Although the exact mechanism that links abnormal 5-HT neurotransmission to the manifestation of head pain has yet to be fully understood, a deficit on 5-HT descending pain inhibitory system is still probably today the most implicated in migraine pathophysiology. This short review focuses and discusses the alteration of peripheral and central 5-HT parameters in migraine patients.