Migralepsy, hemicrania epileptica, post-ictal headache and "ictal epileptic headache": a proposal for terminology and classification revision

Headache in Sturge-Weber syndrome: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a neurocutaneous disorder for which the neurological aspects, particularly headaches, remain poorly understood, despite significantly affecting morbidity. The present study aimed to elucidate the prevalence, characteristics and treatment strategies, as well as explore the pathogenesis of headaches, in SWS.

METHODS

Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically reviewed observational studies, case reports and series from eight databases (Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Embase, Medline, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science), published from 1978 to 2023, to investigate the prevalence, characteristics, medication response and pathogenic theories of headaches in SWS.

RESULTS

The review analyzed 48 studies, uncovering headache prevalence between 37% and 71%. Migraine-like headache affected up to 52% of individuals. Prophylactic and acute treatments included non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, triptans and antiepileptic drugs, despite the lack of established guidelines. Life-threatening headaches in SWS are uncommon, typically accompanied by other neurological symptoms. The pathogenesis of headaches in SWS is considered to involve venous congestion and neuronal hyperexcitability linked to leptomeningeal angiomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Headaches occur more frequently in individuals with SWS than in the general population. Despite symptoms meeting migraine criteria, these headaches should be considered secondary to vascular conditions. Implementing acute and prophylactic treatment is advised to reduce the impact on patients' lives.

Migraine - a borderland disease to epilepsy: near it but not of it

BACKGROUND

Migraine and epilepsy are two paroxysmal chronic neurological disorders affecting a high number of individuals and being responsible for a high individual and socioeconomic burden. The link between these disorders has been of interest for decades and innovations concerning diagnosing and treatment enable new insights into their relationship.

FINDINGS

Although appearing to be distinct at first glance, both diseases exhibit a noteworthy comorbidity, shared pathophysiological pathways, and significant overlaps in characteristics like clinical manifestation or prophylactic treatment. This review aims to explore the intricate relationship between these two conditions, shedding light on shared pathophysiological foundations, genetic interdependencies, common and distinct clinical features, clinically overlapping syndromes, and therapeutic similarities. There are several shared pathophysiological mechanisms, like CSD, the likely underlying cause of migraine aura, or neurotransmitters, mainly Glutamate and GABA, which represent important roles in triggering migraine attacks and seizures. The genetic interrelations between the two disorders can be observed by taking a closer look at the group of familial hemiplegic migraines, which are caused by mutations in genes like CACNA1A, ATP1A2, or SCN1A. The intricate relationship is further underlined by the high number of shared clinical features, which can be observed over the entire course of migraine attacks and epileptic seizures. While the variety of the clinical manifestation of an epileptic seizure is naturally higher than that of a migraine attack, a distinction can indeed be difficult in some cases, e.g. in occipital lobe epilepsy. Moreover, triggering factors like sleep deprivation or alcohol consumption play an important role in both diseases. In the period after the seizure or migraine attack, symptoms like speech difficulties, tiredness, and yawning occur. While the actual attack of the disease usually lasts for a limited time, research indicates that individuals suffering from migraine and/or epilepsy are highly affected in their daily life, especially regarding cognitive and social aspects, a burden that is even worsened using antiseizure medication. This medication allows us to reveal further connections, as certain antiepileptics are proven to have beneficial effects on the frequency and severity of migraine and have been used as a preventive drug for both diseases over many years.

CONCLUSION

Migraine and epilepsy show a high number of similarities in their mechanisms and clinical presentation. A deeper understanding of the intricate relationship will positively advance patient-oriented research and clinical work.

Somatosensory Auras in Epilepsy: A Narrative Review of the Literature

An aura is a subjective experience felt in the initial phase of a seizure. Studying auras is relevant as they can be warning signs for people with epilepsy. The incidence of aura tends to be underestimated due to misdiagnosis or underrecognition by patients unless it progresses to motor features. Also, auras are associated with seizure remission after epilepsy surgery and are an important prognostic factor, guiding the resection site and improving surgical outcomes. Somatosensory auras (SSAs) are characterized by abnormal sensations on one or more body parts that may spread to other parts following a somatotopic pattern. The occurrence of SSAs among individuals with epilepsy can range from 1.42% to 80%. The upper extremities are more commonly affected in SSAs, followed by the lower extremities and the face. The most common type of somatosensory aura is paresthetic, followed by painful and thermal auras. In the primary somatosensory auras, sensations occur more commonly contralaterally, while the secondary somatosensory auras can be ipsilateral or bilateral. Despite the high localizing features of somatosensory areas, cortical stimulation studies have shown overlapping sensations originating in the insula and the supplementary sensorimotor area.

Peri-ictal headache: An underestimated prognostic finding associated with idiopathic epilepsies

OBJECTIVE

There are a handful of studies investigating peri-ictal headache (PIH) and its clinical associations in patients with idiopathic/genetic epilepsies (I/GE). This multi-center study aimed to investigate PIH, which is an ignored comorbid condition in patients with I/GE, by headache experts and epileptologists working together.

METHODS

The data were collected from a cross-sectional large study, using two structured questionnaires for headache and epilepsy features, fulfilled by neurologists. Headaches were classified according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition, whereas seizure and syndrome types were diagnosed according to International League Against Epilepsy criteria. The patients with a headache starting 24 hours before the onset of the seizure (preictal) or within 3 hours after the seizure (postictal) were defined as patients with PIH. We compared demographic and clinical differences between two groups of patients with and without PIH statistically and used ROC curves to determine a threshold of the total number of seizure triggers associated with the occurrence of PIH.

RESULTS

Among 809 (531 females, 65.6%) consecutive patients with I/GE, 105 (13%) patients reported PIH (22 preictal, 82 postictal headaches, and one with both types). Peri-ictal headache was more frequently reported by females and those having a family history of migraine or epilepsy, and it was significantly associated with lower rates of seizure freedom for more than five years, drug resistance, and use of polytherapy, remarkably. Moreover, ROC curves showed that having more than 3 seizure triggers was associated with the presence of PIH.

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed that PIH may be linked to poor outcomes in I/GEs and seems to be related to a lower ictal threshold precipitated by multiple triggers. Future prospective studies will illuminate the unknown underlying mechanisms and appropriate management strategies for PIH to improve the prognosis.

Diagnosis of Patients Presenting with Vertigo, Headache, and Epileptic Seizure: Evaluating Vestibular Patients by Using Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential and Auditory Middle Latency Responses in the Clinical Setting

Migraine and vertigo are common complaints seen in clinical practice, and in a few such cases, we also find epileptic manifestations, including migraine-triggered seizures. Currently, patients presenting with vertigo and headache are diagnosed according to established diagnostic criteria for Meniere's disease, vestibular migraine, or vestibular migraine/Meniere's disease overlapping syndrome. In addition to using those diagnostic criteria and the patient's history, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential and auditory middle latency responses are useful tools to better understand the physiological background of these patients and also to confirm the diagnosis. Here we report 2 cases: 1 of vestibular migraine/ Meniere's disease overlapping syndrome and 1 of vestibular migraine with epileptic manifestations. Each patient showed potentiation (lack of habituation) in auditory middle latency response, and each showed endolymphatic hydrops in cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential. The potentiation in auditory middle latency response might be attributable to neuronal hyperexcitability in those patients with migraine or epilepsy, and neurogenic inflammation caused by migraine episodes might affect inner ear function.

Evaluation of the Patient With Paroxysmal Spells Mimicking Epileptic Seizures

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic issue of paroxysmal spells, including epileptic seizure (ES) mimics, is one that neurologists frequently encounter. This review provides an up-to-date overview of the most common causes of ES mimics encountered in the outpatient setting.

REVIEW SUMMARY

Paroxysmal spells are characterized by changes in awareness, attention, perception, or abnormal movements. These can be broadly classified as ES and nonepileptic spells (NES). NES mimics ES but are distinguished by their symptomatology and lack of epileptiform activity on electroencephalography. NES may have psychological or physiological underpinnings. Psychogenic non-ES are the most common mimics of ES. Physiological causes of NES include syncope, cerebrovascular, movement, and sleep-related disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinguishing NES from ES at times may be challenging even to the most experienced clinicians. However, detailed history with an emphasis on the clinical clues, including taking a moment-by-moment history of the event from the patient and observers and physical examination, helps create an appropriate differential diagnosis to guide further diagnostic testing. An accurate diagnosis of NES prevents iatrogenic harm, including unnecessary exposure to antiseizure medications and overuse of health care resources. It also allows for the correct specialist referral and appropriate treatment.

E. H. Sieveking and his cephalalgia epileptica

Edward Henry Sieveking (1816-1904) was a professionally successful and well respected nineteenth-century London physician who, over the span of some half a century, continuously held appointment to British royalty, including Queen Victoria and King Edward VII. In 1858, he published a monograph On Epilepsy and Epileptiform Seizures, with a second edition in 1861. In both editions, he described an entity cephalalgia epileptica that comprised the occurrence of headache in association with phenomena that resembled the premonitory symptom of some epileptic seizures. However, the sufferers did not have epilepsy, in that they did not experience generalized convulsions. Sieveking, like most of his British contemporaries, had little awareness of the existence of the variety of migraine phenomena apart from headache itself. In retrospect, it seems likely that migraine with aura probably was the main basis of the disorder Sieveking designated, one that later may have been termed migralepsy.

Case report: An EEG captured case of migralepsy/migraine aura-triggered seizures

Introduction

Migraine and epilepsy are common chronic neurological disorders presenting with paroxysmal attacks of transient cerebral dysfunction, followed by subsequent return to baseline between episodes. The term “migralepsy” has been proposed to define migraine-triggered epileptic seizures classified by the ICHD-III as a complication of migraine with an aura.

Case

A 55-year-old man with a 30-year history of migraine without aura presented with a new onset left parietal pain accompanied by visual disturbances occurring up to 20 times per day. His visual distortions included kaleidoscopic vision, flashes of shadows, and a right superior quadrantanopia lasting 20 min. He described discrete 2-min episodes of scintillating scotomas in his right visual field. Ictal EEG demonstrated a left occipital onset focal aware seizure with his clinical symptoms. The patient was started on valproic Acid and has remained asymptomatic.

Discussion

The diagnostic criteria as set out by the ICHD-III for migralepsy and other syndromes with migrainous and ictal features remain confusing for practitioners as there is much overlap in clinical manifestations of these entities. EEG should be obtained when ictal features are noted among patients presenting with headache.

Headache in idiopathic/genetic epilepsies: Cluster analysis in a large cohort

OBJECTIVES

The link between headache and epilepsy is more prominent in patients with idiopathic/genetic epilepsy (I/GE). We aimed to investigate the prevalence of headache and to cluster patients with regard to their headache and epilepsy features.

METHODS

Patients aged 6-40 years, with a definite diagnosis of I/GE, were consecutively enrolled. The patients were interviewed using standardized epilepsy and headache questionnaires and their headache characteristics were investigated by experts in headache. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed and patients were clustered according to their epilepsy and headache characteristics using an unsupervized K-means algorithm.

RESULTS

Among 809 patients, 508 (62.8%) reported having any type of headache; 87.4% had interictal headache and 41.2% had migraine. Cluster analysis revealed two distinct groups for both adults and children/adolescents. In adults, having a family history of headache, ≥5 headache attacks, duration of headache ≥24 months, headaches lasting ≥ 1 hour, and visual analog scale scores >5 were grouped in one cluster, and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), myoclonic, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) were clustered in this group (cluster 1). Self-limited epilepsy with centro-temporal spikes and epilepsy with GTCS alone were clustered in cluster 2 with the opposite characteristics. For children/adolescents, the same features as in adult cluster 1 were clustered in a separate group, except for the presence of JME syndrome and GTCS alone as a seizure type. Focal seizures were clustered in another group with the opposite characteristics. In the entire group, the model revealed an additional cluster, including patients with the syndrome of GTCS-alone (50.51%), with ≥ 5 attacks, headache lasting >4 hours, and throbbing headache; 65.66% of patients had a family history of headache in this third cluster (n=99).

SIGNIFICANCE

Patients with I/GE can be clustered into distinct groups according to headache features along with seizures. Our findings may help in management and planning for future studies.

Perampanel may represent an effective treatment for the prevention of migraine comorbid with epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a common comorbidity in patients with epilepsy. Considering the proven associations and the common pathophysiological features linking epilepsy and migraine, some anti-seizure medications (ASMs) have been considered as a treatment for both disorders. This study aimed at assessing both the effectiveness of perampanel (PER) on epileptic seizures and migraine attacks in patients with epilepsy and comorbid migraine, as well as the reduction in the monthly mean rate usage of rescue migraine medications.

METHODS

This observational, multi-centre study included adult patients with epilepsy and comorbid migraine who started PER to better control epileptic seizures and who were followed up for 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included (mean age 40.13 ± 13.13 years; 67.0% female). At the 12-month follow-up visit, 27 patients were continuing PER concomitantly with 1 (45.2%) or 2 ASMs (54.8%). A significant reduction in epileptic seizures, migraine attacks, and the monthly use of rescue migraine medications between baseline and both 6- and 12-month follow-up visits was documented.

CONCLUSION

PER demonstrated good effectiveness in reducing both epileptic seizures and migraine attacks in patients with comorbid epilepsy and migraine. Future studies with possibly larger samples are needed to evaluate the efficacy of PER in migraine other than epilepsy.

Case Report: Migralepsy: The Two-Faced Janus of Neurology

We report three cases of pediatric patients suffering from migraine aura triggered seizures. This entity, also called migralepsy, still does not have a unique definition today. Migraine and epilepsy are both episodic neurological disorders with periods of interictal well-being; this is indicative of similar pathophysiological mechanisms, such as increased neuronal excitation and ion channel dysfunction. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the clinical and instrumental features of migralepsy through the description of three clinical cases in which the symptoms of the usual migraine aura developed into a generalized tonic–clonic or focal seizure.

Headache in people with epilepsy

Epidemiological estimates indicate that individuals with epilepsy are more likely to experience headaches, including migraine, than individuals without epilepsy. Headaches can be temporally unrelated to seizures, or can occur before, during or after an episode; seizures and migraine attacks are mostly not temporally linked. The pathophysiological links between headaches (including migraine) and epilepsy are complex and have not yet been fully elucidated. Correct diagnoses and appropriate treatment of headaches in individuals with epilepsy is essential, as headaches can contribute substantially to disease burden. Here, we review the insights that have been made into the associations between headache and epilepsy over the past 5 years, including information on the pathophysiological mechanisms and genetic variants that link the two disorders. We also discuss the current best practice for the management of headaches co-occurring with epilepsy and highlight future challenges for this area of research.

Headaches provoked by cortical stimulation: Their localizing value in focal epileptic seizures

OBJECTIVE

Electrical stimulations performed in awake patients identified dura mater, venous sinuses, and arteries as pain-sensitive intracranial structures. However, cephalic pain has been only occasionally reported in patients with epilepsy undergoing stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) stimulations.

METHODS

The aim of our study was to investigate whether headache can be triggered by SEEG stimulations and might be related to specific cortical areas. Data were gathered from 16 050 stimulations collected in 266 patients who underwent a SEEG as part of a presurgical assessment of their drug-resistant epilepsy.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and eight stimulations (1.3%) evoked headaches. Pain was more frequently described as bilateral (42.31%) than ipsilateral (16.83%) or contralateral (14.42%) to the stimulated hemisphere. Headache was more frequently elicited during stimulation of the insulo-limbic regions such as the anterior and medial cingulate gyrus, the mesial part of temporal lobe, and the insula.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that cortical stimulation can evoke headache, mostly during stimulation of the temporo-frontal limbic regions. It suggests that brief epileptic headache can be an epileptic symptom caused by a cortical discharge involving somatic or visceral network and does not reflect only trigemino-vascular activation. Although not specific, the occurrence of a brief epileptic headache may point to a seizure origin in the temporo-frontal limbic regions.

Pathophysiological Bases of Comorbidity in Migraine

Despite that it is commonly accepted that migraine is a disorder of the nervous system with a prominent genetic basis, it is comorbid with a plethora of medical conditions. Several studies have found bidirectional comorbidity between migraine and different disorders including neurological, psychiatric, cardio- and cerebrovascular, gastrointestinal, metaboloendocrine, and immunological conditions. Each of these has its own genetic load and shares some common characteristics with migraine. The bidirectional mechanisms that are likely to underlie this extensive comorbidity between migraine and other diseases are manifold. Comorbid pathologies can induce and promote thalamocortical network dysexcitability, multi-organ transient or persistent pro-inflammatory state, and disproportionate energetic needs in a variable combination, which in turn may be causative mechanisms of the activation of an ample defensive system with includes the trigeminovascular system in conjunction with the neuroendocrine hypothalamic system. This strategy is designed to maintain brain homeostasis by regulating homeostatic needs, such as normal subcortico-cortical excitability, energy balance, osmoregulation, and emotional response. In this light, the treatment of migraine should always involves a multidisciplinary approach, aimed at identifying and, if necessary, eliminating possible risk and comorbidity factors.

Epilepsy in patients with familial hemiplegic migraine

OBJECTIVE

The coexistence of epilepsy in familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) has not been reviewed systematically. We investigated the associations of epilepsy in patients with FHM with CACNA1A, ATP1A2, SCN1A or PRRT2 mutations along with clinical and genetic data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a search in the PubMed bibliographic database and the Cochrane Library was screened for eligible studies, from April 1997 to December 2020. Additionally, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) was searched for mutations in the CACNA1A, ATP1A2, SCN1A and PRRT2 genes. Brief reports, letters, and original articles about FHM and epilepsy were included in the review if their mutations and clinical course of diseases were identified.

RESULTS

Of the included patients with FHM whose information could be accessed, there were 28 families and 195 individuals, 78 of whom had epilepsy; 30 patients had focal epilepsy and 30 patients had generalized epilepsy. All mutations except ATP1A2, which could not be evaluated due to insufficient data, revealed first epilepsy then HM. In 60 patients for whom the epilepsy prognosis was evaluated, only 3.5% of patients were drug-resistant, and the remainder had a self-limited course or responded to anti-epileptic drug treatment.

CONCLUSION

Mutations in all three and possibly four FHM genes can cause epilepsy. Contrary to our expectations, the well-known epilepsy gene SCN1A mutations are not the leading cause; the highest number of cases associated with epilepsy belongs to the ATP1A2 mutation. Drug-resistant forms of epilepsy are rare in all FHM mutations, and this information is important for counseling patients.

Clinical characteristics of migraine in patients with calcified neurocysticercosis

BACKGROUND

Patients with neurocysticercosis (NCC) may have an increased frequency of migraine. We studied the characteristics of migraine attacks in patients with calcified NCC on brain imaging.

METHODS

Of 350 migraine patients who visited our outpatient department from January 2016 through June 2018, 166 had undergone brain imaging. Seventy-two patients with migraines had calcified NCC. The migraine attacks of the patients with calcification (MiC) were compared with those of 94 patients without calcification (MiNC).

RESULTS

Side-locked headaches were seen in 48.6% of the MiC patients. Aura preceding the migraine attack was more common in the MiC group than in the MiNC group (22.22% vs 7.4%; p=0.001). The MiC group had fewer headache episodes per month (5 vs 6; p<0.0001) with fewer common associated features (62.5% vs 84.1%; p=0.006). They also required fewer drugs for secondary prophylaxis (2 vs 3; p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Some of the clinical characteristics of migraine attacks are sufficiently different in patients with and without NCC. This may suggest some influence of NCC in the pathophysiology of migraine to account for alterations in the clinical manifestations of the disease. Whether this difference could be inferred as NCC having a causative role in migraine needs further research.

Activation of Peripheral and Central Trigeminovascular Neurons by Seizure: Implications for Ictal and Postictal Headache

An epileptic seizure can trigger a headache during (ictal) or after (postictal) the termination of the event. Little is known about the pathophysiology of seizure-induced headaches. In the current study, we determined whether a seizure can activate nociceptive pathways that carry pain signals from the meninges to the spinal cord, and if so, to what extent and through which classes of peripheral and central neurons. To achieve these goals, we used single-unit recording techniques and an established animal model of seizure (picrotoxin) to determine the effects of epileptic seizure on the activity of trigeminovascular Aδ-, C-, wide-dynamic range, and high-threshold neurons in male and female rats. Occurrence of seizure activated 54%, 50%, 68%, and 39% of the Aδ-, C-, wide-dynamic range, and high-threshold neurons, respectively. Regardless of their class, activated neurons exhibited a twofold to fourfold increase in their firing, which started immediately (1 min) or up to 90 min after seizure initiation, and lasted as short as 10 min or as long as 120 min. Administration of lidocaine to the dura prevented activation of all neuronal classes but not the initiation or maintenance of the seizure. These findings suggest that all neuronal classes may be involved in the initiation and maintenance of seizure-induced headache, and that their activation patterns can provide a neural substrate for explaining the timing and duration of ictal and possibly postictal headaches. By using seizure, which is evident in humans, this study bypasses controversies associated with cortical spreading depression, which is less readily observed in humans.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This preclinical study provides a neural substrate for ictal and postictal headache. By studying seizure effects on the activity of peripheral (C and Aδ) and central (wide dynamic range and high-threshold) trigeminovascular neurons in intact and anesthetized dura, the findings help resolve two outstanding questions about the pathophysiology of headaches of intracranial origin. The first is that abnormal brain activity (i.e., seizure) that is evident in human (unlike cortical spreading depression) gives rise to specific and selective activation of the different components of the trigeminovascular system, and the second is that the activation of all components of the trigeminovascular pathway (i.e., peripheral and central neurons) depends on activation of the meningeal nociceptors from their receptors in the dura.

Ictal Epileptic Headache: When Terminology Is Not a Moot Question

The relationship between headache and epilepsy is complex and despite the nature of this association is not yet clear. In the last few years, it has been progressively introduced the concept of the “ictal epileptic headache” that was included in the recently revised International Classification of Headaches Disorders 3rd edition (ICHD-3-revised). The diagnostic criteria for ictal epileptic headache (IEH) suggested in 2012 were quite restrictive thus leading to the underestimation of this phenomenon. However, these criteria have not yet been included into the ICHD-3 revision published in 2018, thus creating confusion among both, physicians and experts in this field. Here, we highlight the importance to strictly apply the original IEH criteria explaining the reasons through the analysis of the clinical, historical, epidemiological and pathophysiological characteristics of the IEH itself. In addition, we discuss the issues related to the neurophysiopathological link between headache and epilepsy as well as to the classification of these epileptic events as “autonomic seizure.”

An update on EEG in migraine

Introduction: In the past few years, brain functional analysis has provided scientific evidence supporting the neuronal basis of migraine. The role of electroencephalography (EEG) in detecting subtle dysfunctions in sensory temporal processing has been fully re-evaluated, thanks to advances in methods of quantitative analysis. However, the diagnostic value of EEG in migraine is very low, and migraine diagnosis is completely based on clinical criteria, while the utility of EEG in migraine pathophysiology has only been confirmed in more recent applications. Areas covered: The present review focuses on the few situations in which EEG may provide diagnostic utility, and on the numerous and intriguing applications of novel analysis, based on time-related changes in neuronal network oscillations and functional connectivity. Expert opinion: Although routine EEG is not particularly useful for the clinical assessment of migraine, novel methods of analysis, mostly based on functional connectivity, could improve knowledge of the migraine brain. The application is worthy of promotion and improvement in support of neuroimaging data to shed light on migraine mechanisms and support the rationale for therapeutic approaches.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autoimmunity is believed to play an important causative role in the pathogenesis of epilepsy. There are evidences for the presence of autoantibodies in patients with epilepsy. To date, many studies have assessed the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in epilepsy patients, though the relationship has been inconclusive.

AIMS

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the presence of aPLs in epileptic patients as compared to healthy controls.

METHODS

Five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar) were searched systematically. Study-specific odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects model. Quality assessment was carried out by using the modified 9-star Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). L'Abbé plots were generated to visually inspect heterogeneity while publication bias was evaluated via visualization of contour- enhanced funnel plots, and Begg's and Egger's tests.

RESULTS

Based on the inclusion criteria, 14 studies were selected involving 1248 epilepsy patients and 800 healthy controls. The majority of epilepsy was categorised as generalised or partial and none had comorbidity with autoimmune diseases. Significant presence of both anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies (OR: 5.16, 95% CI: 3.21-8.28, p < 0.00001) and anti-β2- glycoprotein I (anti-β2-GPI) antibodies (OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.07-8.11, p = 0.04) exhibited comorbid association with epilepsy patients as compared to healthy controls. Subgroup analyses revealed that presence of aCL antibodies was more specifically observed in paediatrics (OR: 4.57, 95% CI: 2.57-8.15, p < 0.00001) than adults (OR: 4.24, 95% CI: 1.80-10.01, p = 0.001). The odds of aCL antibody presence was higher in partial epilepsy patients (OR: 7.88, 95% CI: 3.23-19.24, p < 0.00001) than that of generalised (OR: 3.76, 95% CI: 2.15-6.59, p < 0.00001) and in Asian epileptic patients (OR: 9.56, 95% CI: 2.69-33.95, p = 0.0005) than Europeans (OR: 4.35, 95% CI: 2.74-6.92, p < 0.00001). The presence of anti-β2-GPI antibodies was significant in paediatric (OR: 6.44, 95% CI: 1.39-29.89, p = 0.02) and African population with epilepsies (OR: 10.59, 95% CI: 1.22-92.25, p = 0.03). NOS of the majority of the studies (11/14) indicated a high methodological quality. No substantial heterogeneity was observed either from the quantitative analysis or from the L'Abbé plots while no significant publication bias was detected from funnel plots; Begg's and Egger's tests.

CONCLUSION

Since none of the epilepsy subjects exhibited any comorbid autoimmune disorders, significant presence of aCL and anti-β2-GPI antibodies indicate towards their contribution in immune-mediated general pathogenesis of epilepsy.

[Comorbidity of migraine and epilepsy in childhood]

Migraine and epilepsy represent prevalent chronic neurological disorders of childhood. Migraine and epilepsy comorbidity relies on the common pathophysiologic and genetic mechanisms of the paroxysmal disorders the similarity of their precipitating factors, clinical manifestations and therapeutic approaches. The problems of differential diagnosis of migraine and epilepsy are related to peculiarities of migraine manifestations in children. Some forms of epilepsy could be accompanied by cephalgic seizures. The diagnostic criteria of headaches in epileptic patients are presented. A number of genetic diseases accompanying by migraine and epilepsy could be a model for delineation of shared pathogenetic mechanisms of these paroxysmal disorders in which genetically determined channelopathies may play an important role. The efficacy of antiepileptic drugs has been proven as the prophylactic treatment of migraine in pediatric patients. The advantages of levetiracetam as the prophylactic treatment for migraine and epilepsy comorbidity in children are discussed.

Ictal headache: Insights from two cases

Background

We report the first literature description of ictal epileptic headaches closely mimicking glossopharyngeal neuralgia and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing.

Case 1

A 37-year-old man complained of short-lasting, electric-shock like headache, confined to the pharynx. During the episodes, he could not speak because he felt “words blocked at the throat”. An EEG recorded epileptic discharges concomitant with headache; a brain MRI disclosed frontal polymicrogyria.

Case 2

A 66-year-old man complained of short-lasting, right periocular headache, associated with ipsilateral ptosis, conjunctival injection and lacrimation. Some episodes were followed by tonic contraction of the right facial and limb muscles; on one occasion, headache was followed by a generalized seizure. A brain MRI revealed hippocampal abnormalities.

Discussion

These cases highlight the complex relationship between headache and epilepsy, and suggest a possible contribution of cortical structures to the genesis of paroxysmal headaches such as glossopharyngeal neuralgia and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing.

Pathophysiological mechanisms of migraine and epilepsy: Similarities and differences

Migraine and epilepsy are episodic disorders with distinct features, but they have some clinical and pathophysiological overlaps. We review here clinical overlaps between seizures and migraine attacks, activities of neuronal networks observed during seizures and migraine attacks, and molecular and cellular mechanisms of migraine identified in genetic forms, focusing on genetic variants identified in hemiplegic migraine and their functional effects. Epilepsy and migraine can be generated by dysfunctions of the same neuronal networks, but these dysfunctions can be disease-specific, even if pathogenic mutations target the same protein. Studies of rare monogenic forms have allowed the identification of some molecular/cellular dysfunctions that provide a window on pathological mechanisms: we have begun to disclose the tip of the iceberg.

Headache and Epilepsy

Headache, especially migraine, has long been associated with epilepsy, based on the common clinical features of these disorders. Both migraine and epilepsy have a genetic predisposition and share common pathophysiological mechanisms including an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory factors that result in spells of altered brain function and autonomic symptoms. There are well-documented reports on the headache as a sole manifestation of epileptic seizure and headache is commonly associated with as preictal, ictal, and postictal symptoms in epilepsy patients. In addition, migraine and epilepsy are frequently described as highly comorbid conditions and several antiepileptic drugs are used for the patients with migraine as well as epilepsy. In the present review, we briefly discuss the connection between headache and epilepsy in various aspects, including classification, clinical features, epidemiology, genetics, pathophysiology, and treatment.

Exploring two novel cases of suspected ictal epileptic headache, a rare form of paediatric epilepsy

AIM

Ictal epileptic headache (IEH) is a rare and underestimated epileptic form, characterised by epileptiform discharges and headache attacks without any other ictal sensory-motor manifestations. IEH is difficult to diagnose, because the epileptiform discharges have to be registered during the headache attack and the headache has to disappear after the intravenous administration of an anti-epileptic drug, according to the last diagnostic criteria. This study explored the clinical, neuro-physiological and therapeutic features of IEH in the paediatric population.

METHODS

We analysed two novel cases of adolescent female patients with chronic headache and a long history of unsuccessful analgesic oral therapy and without any other ictal sensory-motor events. We also reviewed the entire literature on paediatric IEH.

RESULTS

The clinical history and diagnostic process led us to highly suspect IEH in both patients, and the successful therapy with oral anti-epileptic drugs, namely topiramate and ethosuximide, which resolved the chronic headache, enforced our diagnostic hypothesis. Our literature review highlighted the rarity of IEH clinical reports, particularly in the paediatric population, mainly due to the stringent diagnostic criteria.

CONCLUSION

Our study sheds further light on IEH in the paediatric population and on the importance of diagnostic electroencephalograms in the clinical management of paediatric patients suffering from chronic headache.

Serotonergic Modulation as Effective Treatment for Dravet Syndrome in a Zebrafish Mutant Model

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe epilepsy syndrome that starts within the first year of life. In a clinical study, add-on treatment with fenfluramine, a potent 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) releaser activating multiple 5-HT receptor subtypes, made 70% of DS children seizure free. Others and we recently confirmed the efficacy of fenfluramine as an antiepileptiform compound in zebrafish models of DS. By using a large set of subtype selective agonists, in this study we examined which 5-HT receptor subtypes can be targeted to trigger antiseizure effects in homozygous scn1Lab(-/-) mutant zebrafish larvae that recapitulate DS well. We also provide evidence that zebrafish larvae express the orthologues of all human 5-HT receptor subtypes. Using an automated larval locomotor behavior assay, we were able to show that selective 5-HT1D-, 5-HT1E-, 5-HT2A-, 5-HT2C-, and 5-HT7-agonists significantly decreased epileptiform activity in the mutant zebrafish at 7 days post fertilization (dpf). By measuring local field potentials in the zebrafish larval forebrain, we confirmed the antiepileptiform activity of the 5-HT1D-, 5-HT2C-, and especially the 5-HT2A-agonist. Interestingly, we also found a significant decrease of serotonin in the heads of homozygous scn1Lab(-/-) mutants as compared to the wild type zebrafish, which suggest that neurochemical defects might play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of DS. Taken together, our results emphasize the high conservation of the serotonergic receptors in zebrafish larvae. Modulating certain serotonergic receptors was shown to effectively reduce seizures. Our findings therefore open new avenues for the development of future novel DS therapeutics.

The borderland of migraine and epilepsy in children

OBJECTIVE

To provide a review on the spectrum of migraine-epilepsy disorders in children.

BACKGROUND

The migraine-epilepsy continuum covers a fascinating array of disorders that share many clinical similarities but also differ fundamentally in pathophysiology. In the pediatric population, its study can be complicated by the young age of those affected and the lack of clear understanding of the neurobiology of these disorders within the developing brain.

DISCUSSION

This review serves to discuss the borderland of migraine and epilepsy in children. It will focus on epidemiology and comorbidity of the two disorders, possible mechanisms for shared pathophysiology informed by basic and translational science, and an overview of clinical similarities and differences. It will also discuss differentiation of migraine aura from childhood occipital epilepsies. Finally, the review concludes with a discussion of current classification methods for capturing cases on the migraine-epilepsy spectrum and a call for a united approach towards a better definition of this spectrum of disorders.

CONCLUSION

Recent advances examining the migraine-epilepsy spectrum show clinicopathological similarities between the two disorders in children. Epidemiology demonstrates reciprocally increased incidences of epilepsy in migraineurs and of migraines in children with epilepsy, however, prospective longitudinal in children are currently lacking. Clinically, the two disorders show similarity in preictal, ictal, and postictal phenomena, with close temporal association of the two conditions described by the controversial term of "migralepsy." Basic science research has contributed significant improvements in understanding the generation of both of these episodic neurological conditions, with common links seen at a cellular level involving synaptic glutamate release and the provocation of varying propagation methods including cortical spreading depression in migraine and the paroxysmal depolarizing shift in epilepsy. Despite these significant gains in understanding, improved classification methods are required to identify and further study these interrelated conditions and move towards improved diagnosis and treatment of disorders on the migraine-epilepsy continuum in children.

Headache as an Aura of Epilepsy: Video-EEG Monitoring Study

BACKGROUND

Headache can be associated with epilepsy as a pre-ictal, ictal, or post-ictal phenomenon; however, studies of patients with headache as an epileptic aura are scarce. We performed the present study to investigate the incidence and characteristics of headache as an epileptic aura, via confirmation of electroencephalography (EEG) changes by video-EEG monitoring.

METHODS

Data of aura and clinical seizure episodes of 831 consecutive patients who undertook video-EEG monitoring were analyzed retrospectively. For patients who had headache as an aura, information on the detailed features of headache was acquired, including location, nature, duration, and the presence of accompanying symptoms. Video-recorded clinical seizures, EEG findings, and neuroimaging data were used to determine the ictal onset areas in the patients.

RESULTS

Six out of 831 (0.7%) patients experienced headache as aura (age range, 25-52 years), all of whom had partial seizures. The incidence of pre-ictal headache was 6.3% (25/831), and post-ictal headache was 30.9% (257/831). In patients with headache as aura, five patients described headache as the most frequent aura, and headache was the second most frequent aura in one patient. The characteristics of headache were hemicrania epileptica in two patients, tension-type headache in another two patients, and migraine-like headache in the remaining two patients. No patient met the diagnostic criteria of ictal epileptic headache or migraine aura-triggered seizure.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that headache as an aura is uncommon in adult patients with epilepsy, and that headache can present as diverse features, including hemicrania epileptica, tension-type headache, and migraine-like headache. Further studies are necessary to characterize the features of headache as an epileptic aura in adult patients with epilepsy.

The Comorbidity of Migraine and Epilepsy in Children and Adolescents

Migraine and epilepsy share a number of clinical attributes, including pathophysiology and clinical expression. Both are paroxysmal in nature and thus constitute episodic disorders, yet either may be chronic and/or recurrent. Epileptic seizures and migraine headaches may be mistaken one for the other and may even overlap. In particular, occipital lobe seizures may be misdiagnosed as migraine auras. In this article, we review the relationship between migraine and epilepsy, including the known genetic contributions to both conditions, prodromal, ictal, and postictal headache and shared pathophysiology and treatment options. We describe clinical conditions in which both migraine and epilepsy are prominent features. Lastly, we discuss electronecephaographic abnormalities that have been known to occur in individuals with migraine.

Ictal epileptic headache in adult life: Electroclinical patterns and spectrum of related syndromes

OBJECTIVES

Both headache and epilepsy are frequent paroxysmal disorders that often co-occur or are related in numerous ways. Although ictal epileptic headache has become the focus of several studies, this remains a very rare and not well-known phenomenon. Electroclinical features, pathophysiology, and syndromic context are heterogeneous. We investigated the electroclinical and neuroimaging findings in a population of adult patients with ictal epileptic headache.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 8800 EEG recordings of almost 4800 patients admitted to our video-EEG laboratory from 2010 to 2013 with a history of well-documented epilepsy. We selected patients who reported headache closely related to a seizure documented by video-EEG or 24-hour ambulatory EEG. We analyzed ictal electroclinical features of headache, and we defined the related epileptic syndromes.

RESULTS

We identified five patients with ictal epileptic headache. Two patients described tension headache during an epileptic seizure. In three patients, the headache was accompanied by other "minor" neurological symptoms mimicking a migrainous aura. In all cases, the headache stopped with the end of the epileptic activity. Three patients had a history of partial symptomatic epilepsy with cerebral lesions (low grade glioma, astrocytoma, porencephalic cyst) in the left posterior regions, whereas two patients were affected by idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the rarity of ictal epileptic headache. To date, well-documented video-EEG cases remain as exceptional reports, especially in cases of idiopathic generalized epilepsies. Moreover, we confirm the main involvement of posterior regions in patients with ictal epileptic headache affected by partial symptomatic epilepsies.

An Apparently Classical Case Report of Sturge-Weber Syndrome

Sturge-Weber syndrome is a rare, sporadic, congenital neurocutaneous syndrome, likely due to abnormal development of the cephalic microvasculature. Symptoms and signs depend on the extent and location of the venous dysplasia. We describe a case of a 33-year-old woman presenting with drug-resistant epilepsy, chronic headache, and recurring nonepileptic seizures. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans showed severe frontoparietal right hemisphere atrophy, prevalent right frontoparietal leptomeningeal enhancement, circumscribed angioma of the left rolandic sulcus, and prominent deep venous system. We report an apparently classical Sturge-Weber syndrome and hypothesize a shared pathophysiologic mechanism for clinical symptoms. We speculate that all the main symptoms observed in our patient could be the expression of a functional imbalance between the atrophic right hemisphere and the hyperexcitable left cortex.

Diagnostic criteria currently proposed for "ictal epileptic headache": Perspectives on strengths, weaknesses and pitfalls

PURPOSE

When we published the diagnostic criteria for "ictal epileptic headache" in 2012, we deliberately and consciously chose to adopt restrictive criteria that probably underestimate the phenomenon, rather than spread panic among patients and physicians who are reluctant to accept this entity.

METHODS

Here we discuss four intriguing clinical cases to highlight why we believe, to this day, that it is necessary to follow these restrictive diagnostic criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

EEG is not recommended as a routine examination for children diagnosed with headache, but it is mandatory and must be carried out promptly in cases of prolonged headache that does not respond to antimigraine drugs, if epilepsy is suspected or has been diagnosed previously. This is not a marginal or irrelevant question because possible isolated, non-motor, ictal manifestations should be taken into account before declaring that an epileptic patient is "seizure free" so as to ensure that any decision taken to suspend anticonvulsant therapy is safe.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease vs. Panayiotopoulos syndrome: an underestimated misdiagnosis in pediatric age?

Autonomic signs and symptoms could be of epileptic or nonepileptic origin, and the differential diagnosis depends on a number of factors which include the nature of the autonomic manifestations themselves, the occurrence of other nonictal autonomic signs/symptoms, and the age of the patient. Here, we describe twelve children (aged from ten months to six years at the onset of the symptoms) with Panayiotopoulos syndrome misdiagnosed as gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and Panayiotopoulos syndrome may represent an underestimated diagnostic challenge. When the signs/symptoms occur mainly during sleep, a sleep EEG or, if available, a polysomnographic evaluation may be the most useful investigation to make a differential diagnosis between autonomic epileptic and nonepileptic disorders. An early detection can reduce both the high morbidity related to mismanagement and the high costs to the national health service related to the incorrect diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. To decide if antiseizure therapy is required, one should take into account both the frequency and severity of epileptic seizures and the tendency to have potentially lethal autonomic cardiorespiratory involvement. In conclusion, we would emphasize the need to make a differential diagnosis between gastroesophageal reflux disease and Panayiotopoulos syndrome in patients with "an unusual" late-onset picture of GERD and acid therapy-resistant gastroesophageal reflux, especially if associated with other autonomic symptoms and signs.

High prevalence of headaches in patients with epilepsy

Background

To examine the association between headaches and epilepsy.

Methods

Consecutive adult epileptic patients who went to the outpatient clinic of the Epilepsy Center of PLA General Hospital between February 01, 2012, and May 10, 2013, were recruited into this study. A total of 1109 patients with epilepsy completed a questionnaire regarding headaches.

Results

Overall, 60.1% of the patients (male: 57.2%; female: 63.8%) reported headaches within the last year. The age-weighted prevalence of interictal migraine was 11.7% (male 8.9%, female 15.3%), which is higher than that reported in a large population-based study (8.5%, male 5.4%, female 11.6%) using the same screening questions. The prevalence of postictal headaches was 34.1% (males 32.7%, females 35.2%), and the presence of preictal headaches was 4.5% (males 4.3%, females 5.2%). The prevalence of headache yesterday in the general population was 4.8% (male 3.0%, female 6.6%). Thus, the prevalence of headaches, including migraine, is higher in epileptic patients in China.

Conclusions

The high prevalence of postictal headaches confirms the frequent triggering of a headache by a seizure. A much lower frequency of preictal headaches, a condition in which the real triggering effect of the headache on the seizure might be difficult to prove.

Comorbidity between headache and epilepsy in a Chinese epileptic center

Here we investigated the characteristics and prevalence of headaches in patients with epilepsy in a Chinese epileptic center based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 2nd edition. We found that 60.14% (667/1109) of patients reported headaches. Headache was less prevalent in males (57.17%) than in females (63.75%). Interictal headaches were present in 34.62% of patients, and 139/1109 (12.53%) patients had interictal migraine, which was a higher percentage than reported in a large population-based study from the same area (9.3%) using the same screening question. In addition, 469 (70.31%) patients had postictal headache, migraine characteristics were present in 73.35% of these patients, and 15.35% also suffered from interictal migraine. Lastly, 8.85% patients had preictal headache. These results confirm that headache is very common in patients with epilepsy. Seizures often trigger postictal headaches with migraine features. The comorbidity of migraines and epilepsy should receive clinical attention, as it may influence antiepileptic drug choice, and the headache may require specific treatment.

Clinical factors associated with postictal headache in Chinese patients with partial epilepsy

PURPOSE

To investigate the incidence of postictal headache (PIH) and the factors potentially related to the occurrence of PIH in a Chinese epileptic center.

METHODS

Consecutive adult patients with epilepsy, referred to the outpatient clinic of the Epilepsy Center of the PLA General Hospital between February 01, 2012, and May 10, 2013, were recruited to this study. 854 patients with partial epilepsy completed a questionnaire regarding headache, 466 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), 82 patients with occipital lobe epilepsy (OLE) and 306 patients with frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE). A semi-structured interview was performed in those who confirmed headache.

RESULTS

PIH occurred in 328 (38.41%) of the subjects. By type of epilepsy, PIH was found in 164 (35.19%) of the patients with TLE, 46 (56.01%) of the patients with OLE, and 118 (38.56%) of the patients with FLE. The incidence of PIH in OLE was significantly higher than in TLE and FLE (P<0.05). It occurs more frequently after generalized tonic-clonic seizures than other seizure types. Logistic regression analysis revealed that age at onset, type of seizure and classification of epilepsy were each significantly related to the occurrence of PIH.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study revealed possible relationships between PIH and the region of epileptic focus and area of spread of epileptic discharges.