Sympathetic mechanisms in an animal model of vasovagal syncope

Poincaré Plot Can Be a Useful Tool to Select Potential Responders to Metoprolol Therapy in Children with Vasovagal Syncope

Purpose

To explore the value of the longitudinal axis/transverse axis ratio (L/T) of Poincaré plot in selecting children with vasovagal syncope (VVS) who were suitable for metoprolol therapy.

Patients and Methods

Children with VVS hospitalized in Peking University First Hospital between January 2012 and June 2019 and treated with metoprolol were retrospectively included as the training set, and children with VVS hospitalized between July 2019 and December 2020 were included as the validation set. The sex, age at admission, height, weight, body mass index, course of disease, syncope symptom score before metoprolol treatment, treatment duration, supine heart rate (HR), supine systolic pressure, supine diastolic pressure, peak HR during the head-up tilt test (HUTT), changes of HR during HUTT, hemodynamic response during HUTT, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular fractional shortening and the L/T of Poincaré plot were compared between responders and nonresponders in the training set. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore predictors. Receiver operating characteristic curve was utilized to determine the value of the predictors for selecting potential responders. Finally, the value of the predictors was further verified.

Results

In the training set including 105 children, the L/T in responders was distinctly higher than that in nonresponders (P < 0.001), and there was no apparent difference between the two groups in other indexes. The L/T was statistically related to the efficacy of metoprolol (P < 0.001). The L/T >2.7 yielded a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 82.8% for indicating responders to metoprolol. Taking L/T >2.7 to select potential responders in another 43 children with VVS in the validation set, the sensitivity was 96.6%, specificity 71.4%, and accuracy 88.4%.

Conclusion

The L/T of Poincaré plot >2.7 can be a useful tool to select potential responders to metoprolol therapy in children with VVS.

Baroreflex Sensitivity Predicts Response to Metoprolol in Children With Vasovagal Syncope: A Pilot Study

Objective: To explore the role of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in the head-up tilt test (HUTT) in predicting the therapeutic response of vasovagal syncope (VVS) patients to metoprolol. Materials and Methods: Vasovagal syncope patients treated with metoprolol were enrolled in this study and were classified as responders or non-responders according to changes in their symptom scores before and after metoprolol treatment. Values of BRS in the supine position and at positive response occurrence in the HUTT were obtained, and BRS changes from supine to positive response occurrence were calculated. Differences between responders and non-responders were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the value of BRS for predicting the therapeutic efficacy of metoprolol in pediatric patients with VVS. Results: Forty patients (14 boys; 11.8 ± 2.5 years) diagnosed with VVS were recruited in the study, 28 of whom were verified to be responders to metoprolol and 12 of whom were verified as non-responders. They did not show any differences in baseline characteristics and hemodynamics in the HUTT (p > 0.05). However, the responders had an obviously increased supine BRS value compared to the non-responders (16.9 ± 7.7 ms/mmHg vs. 7.6 ± 3.8 ms/mmHg; p < 0.01). No difference in BRS at positive response occurrence was observed between the two groups (8.9 ± 8.5 ms/mmHg vs. 10.6 ± 9.8 ms/mmHg; p > 0.05). Accordingly, the changes in the BRS of responders were more obvious than in non-responders (8.0 ± 7.8 ms/mmHg vs. -3.0 ± 10.4 ms/mmHg; p < 0.01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predictive value of supine BRS was 0.887 (95% CI, 0.779-0.995; p < 0.01). A cut-off value of 10 ms/mmHg yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 82 and 83%, respectively, in predicting the therapeutic efficacy of metoprolol in pediatric VVS patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the predictive value of BRS changes was 0.827 (95% CI, 0.693-0.962; p < 0.01). A cut-off value of 4 ms/mmHg yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 71 and 83%, respectively. Conclusion: Baroreflex sensitivity may predict the response of children with VVS to metoprolol.

Frequency Domain Indices of Heart Rate Variability are Useful for Differentiating Vasovagal Syncope and Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of frequency domain indices of heart rate variability (HRV) in the differential diagnosis between pediatric vasovagal syncope and postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS).

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty-five patients aged 7-16 years with either vasovagal syncope or POTS were enrolled in the experimental group; 18 healthy children served as controls. Holter electrocardiography was used to detect HRV frequency-domain indices in patients with vasovagal syncope, patients with POTS, and control subjects. The differences in HRV indices were compared between the vasovagal syncope and POTS groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated to analyze the predictive value of HRV for the differential diagnosis between vasovagal syncope and POTS in children. In addition, 37 children aged 7-17 years with either vasovagal syncope or POTS were recruited as an external validation group.

RESULTS

The daytime ultra-low frequency (dULF), nighttime ULF (nULF), daytime very low frequency (dVLF), and nighttime VLF (nVLF) were higher in the vasovagal syncope group compared with the POTS group (P < .01 for dULF, dVLF, and nVLF; P < .05 for nULF). The dULF, nULF, dVLF, and nVLF yielded a sensitivity of 73.3%, 71.1%, 68.9%, and 62.2%, respectively, and a specificity of 72.5%, 62.5%, 60.0%, and 60.0%, respectively, to differentiate vasovagal syncope from POTS. The external validation with clinical diagnostic standard showed that a dULF cutoff value of 36.2 ms² for differentiating POTS from vasovagal syncope yielded a sensitivity of 71.4%, a specificity of 75.0%, and an accuracy of 73.0%.

CONCLUSION

dULF may be a useful measure for the differential diagnosis between vasovagal syncope and POTS in adolescents.

Value of Immediate Heart Rate Alteration From Supine to Upright in Differential Diagnosis Between Vasovagal Syncope and Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children

Objectives: To explore the predictive value of immediate heart rate alteration from supine to upright in the differential diagnosis between vasovagal syncope (VVS) and postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS) in children. Materials and Methods: A total of 76 pediatric outpatients or inpatients who visited the Peking University First Hospital from July 2016 to November 2017 were recruited in the study. Among them, 52 patients were diagnosed with VVS and 24 patients were diagnosed with POTS. The differential diagnostic value of acceleration index (AI) and 30/15 ratio was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An external validation test was performed in another 46 patients. Results: Compared with the cases in the VVS group, patients in the POTS group had a significantly increased AI but a decreased 30/15 ratio (33.495 ± 8.472 vs. 23.440 ± 8.693, p < 0.001; 0.962 ± 0.067 vs. 1.025 ± 0.084, p = 0.002; respectively). The ROC curves showed that AI and 30/15 ratio were useful for differentiating POTS from VVS. A cut-off value of AI set at 28.180 yielded a sensitivity of 79.2% and a specificity of 73.1%. A cut-off value of 30/15 ratio set at 1.025 yielded a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 61.5%. A combined use of these two indices improved the sensitivity to 95.8% when either AI or 30/15 was used, and specificity to 80.8% with the use of both AI and 30/15 at the same diagnosis. The external validation test showed that the positive and negative predictive values of the AI and 30/15 ratio were 77.3 and 79.2%, and 72.0 and 81.0%, respectively. The positive predictive value increased to 87.5% when both the AI and 30/15 ratio cut-off values were used together. Conclusions: The AI and 30/15 ratio, which are easy to perform and non-invasive, have proper sensitivity and specificity to differentiate patients with POTS from those with VVS. The combination of these two indices significantly improves the predictive value.