Levetiracetam bei generalisierten Epilepsien des Erwachsenenalters

Analysis of primary outpatient data for off-label use of medicines in neurology

Introduction: The off-label use of medicines is a common practice that covers a wide range of therapeutic areas in both, adults and children. So far, the extent of off-label use among neurology patients in Bulgaria has not been studied. The aim of this study is to provide data on the off-label use in neurology patients in Bulgaria and to contribute to planning actions by the European Commission and EMA to provide a harmonized guideline and to regulate the off-label use of medicines within the European Union.

Materials and methods: The data on prescriptions of 360 neurology outpatients, treated in a 1 – year period, were recorded and provided for analyses. The Summaries of Product Characteristics, were used as reference documents for assessment of prescriptions.

Results: The results from this study show that most neurology patients (63%) were exposed to off-label use. Most of the medicines prescribed off-label (90%), were used for a therapeutic indication, other than the one listed in the authorized product information. Meloxicam is found to be the most commonly prescribed off-label medicine. Other medicines, like trasadone, pentoxyfylline and fupentixol / melitracen were prescribed less frequently, but deserve special attention, as they were found to be used off-label to a very large extent, some of them in 100% of prescriptions. Half of the top 10 medications, most commonly used off-label in neurology, were found to be non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Conclusion: The results reveal a big gap between the authorized medicines and the real medical needs. Further studies based on a larger number of medical centers are needed to establish more accurate data on off-label prescribing in neurology patients on a national level.

Levetiracetam and brivaracetam: a review of evidence from clinical trials and clinical experience

Until the early 1990s, a limited number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were available. Since then, a large variety of new AEDs have been developed and introduced, several of them offering new modes of action. One of these new AED families is described and reviewed in this article. Levetiracetam (LEV) and brivaracetam (BRV) are pyrrolidone derivate compounds binding at the presynaptic SV2A receptor site and are thus representative of AEDs with a unique mode of action. LEV was extensively investigated in randomized controlled trials and has a very promising efficacy both in focal and generalized epilepsies. Its pharmacokinetic profile is favorable and LEV does not undergo clinically relevant interactions. Adverse reactions comprise mainly asthenia, somnolence, and behavioral symptoms. It has now been established as a first-line antiepileptic drug. BRV has been recently introduced as an adjunct antiepileptic drug in focal epilepsy with a similarly promising pharmacokinetic profile and possibly increased tolerability concerning psychiatric adverse events. This review summarizes the essential preclinical and clinical data of LEV and BRV that is currently available and includes the experiences at a large tertiary referral epilepsy center.

Neurologist adherence to clinical practice guidelines and costs in patients with newly diagnosed and chronic epilepsy in Germany

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate physician adherence to the German Neurological Society guidelines of 2008 regarding initial monotherapy and to determine the cost-of-illness in epilepsy.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study using health data routinely collected at 55 outpatient neurology practices throughout Germany (NeuroTransData network). Data on socioeconomic status, course of epilepsy, anticonvulsive treatment, and direct and indirect costs were recorded using practice software-based questionnaires.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred eighty-four patients with epilepsy (785 male (49.6%); mean age: 51.3±18.1years) were enrolled, of whom 507 were newly diagnosed. Initial monotherapy was started according to authorization status in 85.9%, with nonenzyme-inducing drugs in 94.3% of all AEDs. Drugs of first choice by guideline recommendations were used in 66.5%. Total annual direct costs in the first year amounted to €2194 (SD: €4273; range: €55-43,896) per patient, with hospitalization (59% of total direct costs) and anticonvulsants (30%) as the main cost factors. Annual total direct costs decreased by 29% to €1572 in the second year, mainly because of a 59% decrease in hospitalization costs. The use of first choice AEDs did not influence costs. Chronic epilepsy was present in 1077 patients, and total annual direct costs amounted to €1847 per patient, with anticonvulsants (51.0%) and hospitalization (41.0%) as the main cost factors. Potential cost-driving factors in these patients were active epilepsy and focal epilepsy syndrome.

CONCLUSION

This study shows excellent physician adherence to guidelines regarding initial monotherapy in adults with epilepsy. Newly diagnosed patients show higher total direct and hospital costs in the first year upon diagnosis, but these are not influenced by adherence to treatment guidelines.

[Impact of early benefit assessment on patients with epilepsy in Germany: Current healthcare provision and therapeutic needs]

Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases and represents a significant burden for patients, their families and society. In more than 75 % of patients anticonvulsant therapy consists of valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine or levetiracetam. There is a need for polytherapy in drug-refractory patients and they suffer from negative effects on quality of life and employment that is associated with high indirect costs. To allow a comprehensive treatment in this patient group, access to new anticonvulsants with novel modes of action is needed; however, all applications for new antiepileptic drugs failed to prove added benefits during the Pharmaceutical Market Restructuring Act (AMNOG) in Germany. One of the main reasons is the mandatory definition of a standard comparative therapy. It remains unclear whether there will be studies in the future which will fulfill the requirements of the current version of AMNOG. Observational studies after approval and marketing of new antiepileptic drugs could be better alternatives to prove added benefits for individual patients in the current German healthcare system.