Survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo

Assessment of hepatic transporter function in rats using dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MRI: a reproducibility study

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have revealed a substantial between-centre variability in DCE-MRI biomarkers of hepatocellular function in rats. This study aims to identify the main sources of variability by comparing data measured at different centres and field strengths, at different days in the same subjects, and over the course of several months in the same centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

13 substudies were conducted across three facilities on two 4.7 T and two 7 T scanners using a 3D spoiled gradient echo acquisition. All substudies included 3-6 male Wistar-Han rats each, either scanned once with vehicle (n = 76) or twice with either vehicle (n = 19) or 10 mg/kg of rifampicin (n = 13) at follow-up. Absolute values, between-centre reproducibility, within-subject repeatability, detection limits, and effect sizes were derived for hepatocellular uptake rate (Ktrans) and biliary excretion rate (kbh). Sources of variability were identified using analysis of variance and stratification by centre, field strength, and time period.

RESULTS

Data showed significant differences between substudies of 31% for Ktrans (p = 0.013) and 43% for kbh (p < 0.001). Within-subject differences were substantially smaller for kbh (8%) but less so for Ktrans (25%). Rifampicin-induced inhibition was safely above the detection limits, with an effect size of 75 ± 3% in Ktrans and 67 ± 8% in kbh. Most of the variability in individual data was accounted for by between-subject (Ktrans = 23.5%; kbh = 42.5%) and between-centre (Ktrans = 44.9%; kbh = 50.9%) variability, substantially more than the between-day variation (Ktrans = 0.1%; kbh = 5.6%). Significant differences in kbh were found between field strengths at the same centre, between centres at the same field strength, and between repeat experiments over 2 months apart in the same centre.

DISCUSSION

Between-centre bias caused by factors such as hardware differences, subject preparations, and operator dependence is the main source of variability in DCE-MRI of liver function in rats, closely followed by biological between-subject differences. Future method development should focus on reducing these sources of error to minimise the sample sizes needed to detect more subtle levels of inhibition.

Bias, Repeatability and Reproducibility of Liver T1 Mapping With Variable Flip Angles

Background

Three‐dimensional variable flip angle (VFA) methods are commonly used for T₁ mapping of the liver, but there is no data on the accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of this technique in this organ in a multivendor setting.

Purpose

To measure bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of VFA T₁ mapping in the liver.

Study Type

Prospective observational.

Population

Eight healthy volunteers, four women, with no known liver disease.

Field Strength/Sequence

1.5‐T and 3.0‐T; three‐dimensional steady‐state spoiled gradient echo with VFAs; Look‐Locker.

Assessment

Traveling volunteers were scanned twice each (30 minutes to 3 months apart) on six MRI scanners from three vendors (GE Healthcare, Philips Medical Systems, and Siemens Healthineers) at two field strengths. The maximum period between the first and last scans among all volunteers was 9 months. Volunteers were instructed to abstain from alcohol intake for at least 72 hours prior to each scan and avoid high cholesterol foods on the day of the scan.

Statistical Tests

Repeated measures ANOVA, Student t‐test, Levene's test of variances, and 95% significance level. The percent error relative to literature liver T₁ in healthy volunteers was used to assess bias. The relative error (RE) due to intrascanner and interscanner variation in T₁ measurements was used to assess repeatability and reproducibility.

Results

The 95% confidence interval (CI) on the mean bias and mean repeatability RE of VFA T₁ in the healthy liver was 34 ± 6% and 10 ± 3%, respectively. The 95% CI on the mean reproducibility RE at 1.5 T and 3.0 T was 29 ± 7% and 25 ± 4%, respectively.

Data Conclusion

Bias, repeatability, and reproducibility of VFA T₁ mapping in the liver in a multivendor setting are similar to those reported for breast, prostate, and brain.

Level of Evidence

1

Technical Efficacy Stage

1