Prognostic implications of hMLH1 and p53 immunohistochemical status in right-sided colon cancer

The Impact of Extramural Venous Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: A Detailed Analysis Based on Tumor Location and Evaluation Methods

This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic implications of extramural venous invasion (EMVI) in colorectal cancer (CRC) through a meta-analysis. Eighteen eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. Data on the prevalence of EMVI and the correlation between EMVI and survival were collected from these studies. In addition, a subgroup analysis was conducted based on tumor location and evaluation methods. The estimated prevalence of EMVI was 28.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 23.1% to 34.0%) in patients with CRC. The estimated prevalence of EMVI in patients with colon cancer and rectal cancer was 23.0% (95% CI = 17.6% to 29.6%) and 35.7% (95% CI = 22.3% to 51.6%), respectively. Based on the evaluation method, the estimated prevalence of EMVI were 28.3% (95% CI = 23.2% to 34.1%) and 27.3% (95% CI = 8.4% to 60.6%) in pathologic and radiologic examinations, respectively. The correlation of EMVI with worse overall and disease-free survival rates was significant (hazard ratio = 1.773, 95% CI = 1.483-2.120, and hazard ratio = 2.059, 95% CI = 1.683-2.520, respectively). However, in the subgroup analysis with radiologic examination, there was no significant difference in survival rates between patients with and without EMVI. Our study showed that EMVI was frequently detected in 28.3% of patients with CRC and was correlated to worse survival. The detection of EMVI can be useful for predicting the prognosis of patients with CRC.

Prognostic Value of Mismatch Repair Genes for Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Meta-Analysis

DNA mismatch repair was proposed to play a pivotal role in the development and prognosis of colorectal cancer. However, the prognostic value of mismatch repair on colorectal cancer is still unknown. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched. The articles about mismatch repair (including hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH3, hMSH6, hPMSH1, and hPMSH2) deficiency for the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer were included in the study. The hazard ratio and its 95% confidence interval were used to measure the impact of mismatch repair deficiency on survival time. Twenty-one articles were included. The combined hazard ratio for mismatch repair deficiency on overall survival was 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.69) and that on disease-free survival was 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.75). In subgroup analysis, there were a significant association between overall survival and mismatch repair deficiency in Asian studies (hazard ratio: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.91) and Western studies (hazard ratio: 0.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.67). For disease-free survival, the hazard ratios in Asian studies and Western studies were 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.38-0.81) and 0.62 (95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.78), respectively. Our meta-analysis indicated that mismatch repair could be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer.

Is right-sided colon cancer different to left-sided colorectal cancer? - a systematic review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits differences in incidence, pathogenesis, molecular pathways and outcome depending on the location of the tumor. This review focuses on the latest developments in epidemiological and scientific studies, which have enhanced our understanding on the underlying genetic and immunological differences between the proximal (right-sided) colon and the distal (left-sided) colorectum. The different ways in which environmental risk factors influence the pathogenesis of CRC depending on its location and the variations in surgical and oncological outcomes are also discussed in this review. In the current era of personalized medicine, we aim to reiterate the importance of tumor location in management of CRC and the implication on future clinical and scientific research.

MLH1 as a direct target of MiR-155 and a potential predictor of favorable prognosis in pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The regulation of Mut L homologue 1 (MLH1) expression by microRNA (miR)-155 and its prognostic significance in pancreatic cancer (PC) remain to be elucidated. This study aimed to address the issues.

METHODS

MiR-155 mimics and inhibitor were transfected to PC cell lines, Panc-1 and Capan-1. Expression of MLH1 was subsequently evaluated. Then, luciferase activity was detected after miR-155 mimics and pRL-TK plasmids containing wild-type and mutant 3'UTRs of MLH1 mRNA were co-transfected. Finally, immunohistochemical staining for MLH1 was performed in PC samples.

RESULTS

Transfection of miR-155 mimics and inhibitor led to reversely altered protein expressions of miR-155 and MLH1, whereas the corresponding mRNA expressions were similar. A significant decrease in luciferase activity in the cells transfected with the wild-type pRL-TK plasmid was shown in contrast to those transfected with the mutant one. In addition, MLH1 was less expressed in tumor than in para-tumor tissues of PC. Extensive MLH1 expression was significantly associated with favorable differentiation and less lymph node metastasis. MLH1 expression was found to be a prognosticator in univariate analysis, and being of marginally significant impact in multivariate test.

CONCLUSIONS

MLH1 might serve as a direct target of miR-155 and a potential prognosis predictor in PC.

A simple immunohistochemical algorithm predicts the risk of distant metastases in right-sided colon cancer

AIMS

A test predicting distant metastases would be valuable for prognostication in colon cancer (CC). In previous studies, CC with microsatellite instability (MSI) showed a reduced risk of distant metastases. High expression of CD133 and β-catenin, both related to cancer stem cell phenotypes, might be predictive markers for metastasis. The aim of this study was to develop a simple and robust test for risk assessment of distant metastases in CC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a case-control study, 57 cases of right-sided CC specimens with synchronous distant metastases were matched with 57 CC without distant metastases. Immunohistochemistry for MLH1, CD133 and nuclear β-catenin was carried out. To define the diagnostic algorithm the tumours were first stratified according to their MLH1 expression. Loss of MLH1 expression was correlated significantly with a very low risk of distant metastases (5.3%; P = 0.00003). In MLH1-positive cases, combined high scores of CD133 and β-catenin were associated with a very high rate of distant metastases (94.4%), whereas the risk was intermediate for carcinomas with either low CD133 and/or low β-catenin expression (P = 0.0007). A validation study using an independent set of 68 right-sided CC specimens showed a clear trend towards risk stratification according to the algorithm; however, sample sizes were small, and associations were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

By the use of three markers, this algorithm allowed identification of subgroups of right-sided CC patients with extremely high and extremely low risk of distant metastases.

High expression of testes-specific protease 50 is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal carcinoma

Background

Testes-specific protease 50 (TSP50) is normally expressed in testes and abnormally expressed in breast cancer, but whether TSP50 is expressed in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and its clinical significance is unclear. We aimed to detect TSP50 expression in CRC, correlate it with clinicopathological factors, and assess its potential diagnostic and prognostic value.

Methodology/Principal Findings

TSP50 mRNAs and proteins were detected in 7 CRC cell lines and 8 CRC specimens via RT-PCR and Western blot analysis. Immunohistochemical analysis of TSP50, p53 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) with tissue microarrays composed of 95 CRCs, 20 colorectal adenomas and 20 normal colorectal tissues were carried out and correlated with clinicopathological characteristics and disease-specific survival for CRC patients. There was no significant correlation between the expression levels of TSP50 and p53 (P = 0.751) or CEA (P = 0.663). Abundant expression of TSP50 protein was found in CRCs (68.4%) while it was poorly expressed in colorectal adenomas and normal tissues (P<0.0001). Thus, CRCs can be distinguished from them with high specificity (92.5%) and positive predictive value (PPV, 95.6%). The survival of CRC patients with high TSP50 expression was significantly shorter than that of the patients with low TSP50 expression (P = 0.010), specifically in patients who had early-stage tumors (stage I and II; P = 0.004). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that high TSP50 expression was a statistically significant independent risk factor (hazard ratio  = 2.205, 95% CI = 1.214–4.004, P = 0.009).

Conclusion

Our data demonstrate that TSP50 is a potential effective indicator of poor survival for CRC patients, especially for those with early-stage tumors.

The Prognostic Impact of p53 Expression on Sporadic Colorectal Cancer Is Dependent on p21 Status

The prognostic value of p53 and p21 expression in colorectal cancer is still under debate. We hypothesize that the prognostic impact of p53 expression is dependent on p21 status. The expression of p53 and p21 was immunohistochemically investigated in a prospective cohort of 116 patients with UICC stage II and III sporadic colorectal cancer. The results were correlated with overall and recurrence-free survival. The mean observation period was 51.8 ± 2.5 months. Expression of p53 was observed in 72 tumors (63%). Overall survival was significantly better in patients with p53-positive carcinomas than in those without p53 expression (p = 0.048). No differences were found in recurrence-free survival (p = 0.161). The p53+/p21− combination was seen in 68% (n = 49), the p53+/p21+ combination in 32% (n = 23). Patients with p53+/p21− carcinomas had significantly better overall and recurrence-free survival than those with p53+/p21+ (p < 0.0001 resp. p = 0.003). Our data suggest that the prognostic impact of p53 expression on sporadic colorectal cancer is dependent on p21 status.

Mismatch repair, p53 and chromosomal aberrations in primary colorectal carcinomas

Colorectal carcinoma progresses via at least two genetic pathways. Microsatellite instability, due to defective mismatch repair genes, characterizes one pathway and gross chromosomal instability another. The involvement of p53 and mismatch repair gene abnormalities within these pathways has not been fully explored. We aimed to investigate the relationships of p53 and mismatch repair gene defects on gross chromosomal aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization in 49 colorectal carcinomas. Tumours demonstrating loss of expression for hMLH1 or hMSH2 proteins demonstrated a highly significant attenuation in the number of gross chromosomal aberrations (p = 0.007) and were less likely to show p53 overexpression (p = 0.02). Within the mismatch repair normal tumours, p53 status did not affect the total number of chromosomal aberrations but p53 overexpression was significantly associated with a higher frequency of amplifications at 8q22-ter and at 13q21-22. Colorectal cancer demonstrates distinct molecular phenotypes and should be sub-classified accordingly.

Immunohistochemical test for MLH1 and MSH2 expression predicts clinical outcome in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic significance of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status in a large series of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients. The relationship among MMR status, adjuvant chemotherapy, and clinical outcome was also investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 718 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (393 stage II and 325 stage III) who underwent curative surgical resection. MMR status was determined by immunohistochemical analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 expression. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was assessed in 363 patients using mononucleotide and dinucleotide markers.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen (15.9%) carcinomas showed abnormal MMR protein (MMRP) expression (96 MLH1 negative and 18 MSH2 negative) and were classified as MMRP negative, whereas 604 tumors demonstrated normal MLH1/MSH2 immunoreactivity (MMRP positive). MLH1/MSH2 expression was closely related to MSI status (P < .001) and several clinicopathologic features. Patients with MMRP-negative carcinomas demonstrated a marked reduction in the risk of cancer-related death with respect to patients with MMRP-positive tumors (hazard ratio, 0.2579; 95% CI, 0.1289 to 0.5159). A better clinical outcome for patients with MMRP-negative tumors was observed in both stage II (P = .0006) and stage III (P = .0052) disease. In stage III disease, the survival advantage conferred by MMRP-negative tumors was more evident among patients treated with surgery alone than among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. A nonsignificant trend for survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was observed among patients with MMRP-positive carcinomas but not among those with MMRP-negative carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemical testing for MLH1/MSH2 expression provides useful prognostic information for the management of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients.

Does Biomolecular Characterization of Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer Have Any Prognostic Value?

As new improvements in the treatment of colorectal cancer have become available, it has become important to understand the benefits of new therapies or the deleterious effects stemming from the increased risk of toxicity. In particular, a more rational approach to adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III disease should be defined by understanding which patients have a higher recurrence risk. Many studies have investigated several molecular markers, but none has been definitively associated with patient outcome. We present a review of studies that have evaluated the immunohistochemical correlation between expression of some biomarkers, such as thymidylate synthase, p53, Ki-67, Bcl-2, and microsatellite instability status expressed by Mut-L homologue 1 and Mut-S homologue 2 proteins, and the prognosis of patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer. We have evaluated studies in which > or = 100 patients were involved in an effort to ensure a representative study group. The only biomarker likely to have a prognostic value is microsatellite instability status, which correlated with a better prognosis.