Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for steroid-resistant optic neuritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III study

Visual Function Improvement after Plasma Exchange Therapy for Acute Optic Neuritis in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: Case Series and Review

OBJECTIVE

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) are autoimmune-mediated central nervous system disorders distinguished by the presence of serum aquaporine-4 IgG antibody (AQP4-Ab). The clinical panel comprises severe optic neuritis (ON) and transverse myelitis, which can result in incomplete recovery and a high risk of recurrence.

METHODS

This study aimed to evaluate the visual outcomes of three patients with severe acute ON in NMOSD that was non-responsive to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), who received plasma exchange therapy (PLEX). We included three patients (P1, P2 and P3) with severe acute ON who had no improvement after IVMP treatment and were admitted to the ophthalmology department at the Emergency University Hospital Bucharest from January 2022 to September 2023. All three patients with ON were diagnosed in accordance with the criteria described by the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. All the subjects were experiencing their first attack.

RESULTS

The mean recruitment age was 35.3 ± 7.71. All patients were seropositive for the AQP4 antibody. All patients were tested for serum myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody but only one showed a positive test (P3). Lesions visible in orbital MRI indicated the involvement of retrobulbar, canalicular and/or intracranial segments. All three subjects had no response or incomplete remission after an IVMP protocol (5 days of 1000 mg intravenous methylprednisolone in sodium chloride 0.9%). The mean time from onset of optic neuritis to PLEX was 37.6 days. The PLEX treatment protocol comprised five cycles of plasma exchange treatment over 10 days, with a plasma exchange session every other day. An amount of 1 to 1.5 volumes of circulating plasma were dialyzed for 2-4 h. At 1 month after the completion of PLEX therapy, BCVA and VF parameters were improved in all three patients.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of ON remains subject to debate and is somewhat controversial. Plasma exchange must be considered as a rescue therapy when IVMP is insufficient for AQP4-ON patients. This study revealed that PLEX treatment effectively improves the visual outcomes of patients experiencing their first attack of severe acute isolated ON after high-dose IVMP treatment. This study suggests that PLEX may be associated with improved visual outcomes in NMOSD acute optic neuritis.

Evaluation of Steroid Pulse Therapy Responsiveness in Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Positive Optic Neuritis

PURPOSE

Myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-positive optic neuritis (MOGON) is usually responsive to the steroid, but, for some patients, steroid pulse therapy alone may be inadequate. This study aimed to investigate the factors predicting the response to steroid pulse therapy in MOGON.

METHODS

This study included 17 patients (24 eyes) with MOGON, who received single steroid pulse therapy as initial treatment. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and mean deviation (MD) values after treatment were examined concerning findings at onset.

RESULTS

No correlation was found between BCVA at onset and after treatment, but a correlation was observed between MD values at onset and after treatment (correlation coefficient 0.48, p=0.01, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient). Age, gender, duration from onset to treatment, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and optical coherence tomography findings did not affect visual function after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe visual field impairment at onset may indicate that additional treatment may be necessary.

Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domains for optic neuritis: a bibliometric research from 2013 to 2022

PURPOSE

To explore the global research trends, hotspots and frontiers of optic neuritis (ON) over the past decade through qualitative and quantitative analysis of bibliometrics.

METHODS

Publications on ON from 2013 to 2022 were retrieved from Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). VOSviewer and CiteSpace were mainly used to facilitate bibliometric analysis and visualization.

RESULTS

A total of 3027 papers were retrieved from peer-reviewed publications and the annual research output increased over time. Neurosciences neurology was the most published area. The USA was the most productive and influential country, and in the focus of international cooperation. University College London was the most productive organization and Charite Medical University of Berlin had the largest number of cooperating partners. Paul F contributed the largest number of publications and Wingerchuk DM ranked first among the co-cited authors. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders was the most prolific journal publishing ON research. The most co-cited references mainly focused on the diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS). The keywords formed the following four clusters: the pathophysiology of MS-ON; the autoantibody markers and diagnostic criteria of NMOSD-ON and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated disorder-ON (MOGAD-ON); the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of ON; and the treatment of ON.

CONCLUSION

This bibliometrics analysis showed a systematic view of the evolutionary process, research hotspots, and future directions of ON research. It can provide insights for ON research and valuable information for neuro-ophthalmologic specialists to evaluate research policies and promote international cooperation.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Selected Neurological Diseases-One Centre's Experience Based on the Therapy of 141 Patients

BACKGROUND

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are the first-choice drugs for the treatment of certain neuroimmune diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVIg in patients with selected nervous system diseases.

METHODS

The study enrolled patients who received IVIg in programmes financed by the National Health Fund in Poland. The status of patients upon inclusion and during treatment was assessed using scales dedicated to specific neurological diseases.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 141 patients aged 56.28 ± 14.72 (51.77% female): 21 patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), 65 with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), 30 with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), 12 with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and 13 patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Neurological improvement was found in 14 (66.66%) MG patients (with a reduction of at least three points on the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGS) within 14 days from the completion of the cycle), and in 34 (52.3%) GBS patients (with a reduction of at least one point on the Medical Research Council Scale within 14 days from the completion of the cycle). The parameters with the strongest effect on clinical improvement in MG patients were age [OR 1.033, CI 95% [0.09-1.09], p = 0.049] and baseline QMGS [OR 0.505; CI 95% [0.24-0.87], p = 0.038]. In the majority of CIDP patients (27, 97%) and NMOSD patients (6, 50%), neurological stabilisation was observed (without clinical improvement, defined for CIDP patients as an increase of at least two points on the Lovett Scale after three courses of IVIg were administered, and for NMOSD patients as an increase of at least one point on the Medical Research Council Scale and/or a shift of at least 0.3 logMAR after three courses of treatment). Deep-vein thrombosis was only one serious adverse event in the total group of patients treated with IVIg.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IVIg in patients with MG and GBS mostly results in neurological improvement, while in patients with NMOSD and CIDP, it mostly results in disease stabilisation. This could indicate the predominant anti-idiotypic antibody activity of IVIg in acute neuroimmune diseases or during exacerbations in chronic autoimmune diseases. The therapy of AE in comorbid neoplastic disease is burdened with an elevated risk of failure for IVIg. The results of our study confirm the improved safety of IVIg for selected neurological diseases.

Update on glial antibody-mediated optic neuritis

Optic neuritis (ON) refers to inflammatory demyelinating lesions of the optic nerve, which can cause acute or subacute vision loss and is a major cause of vision loss in young adults. Much of our understanding of typical ON is from the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial. Glial autoantibodies to aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin (AQP4-IgG) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunoglobulin (MOG-IgG) are recently established biomarkers of ON that have revolutionized our understanding of atypical ON. The detection of glial antibodies is helpful in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with different types of ON. AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG screening is strongly recommended for patients with atypical ON. Research on the pathogenesis of NMOSD and MOGAD will promote the development and marketing of targeted immunotherapies. The application of new and efficient drugs, such as the selective complement C5 inhibitor, IL-6 receptor inhibitor, B cell-depleting agents, and drugs against other monoclonal antibodies, provides additional medical evidence. This review provides information on the diagnosis and management of glial antibody-mediated ON.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin in the Treatment of Adalimumab-associated Optic Neuritis

Optic neuritis (ON) is a rare complication of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors. The autoantibody serostatus, treatment, and outcome of TNF-α inhibitor-associated ON remain unclear. We herein report a 50-year-old woman with ON following adalimumab therapy. The patient presented with decreasing visual acuity of the right eye, quickly diminishing to light perception. Anti-aquaporin-4 (anti-AQP4) and anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies were negative. Adalimumab was discontinued, and intravenous methylprednisolone and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) were administered. However, her visual acuity improved only up to counting fingers. IVIg may be ineffective depending on the pretreatment severity.

Efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in autoimmune neurological diseases. Literature systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are the first-line treatment for several common autoimmune neurological diseases. Other therapeutic approaches, including intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasmapheresis, have shown mixed results in patient improvement.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of IVIg administration with that of corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and placebo in autoimmune neurological diseases like Guillain-Barré syndrome, myasthenia gravis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, optic neuritis, and multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed on the databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. Controlled, randomized studies comparing the efficacy of IVIg with placebo, plasmapheresis, and/or glucocorticoid administration were selected. Only studies reporting the number of patients who improved after treatment were included, irrespective of language or publication year. In total, 23 reports were included in the meta-analysis study.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis showed a beneficial effect of IVIg administration on patient improvement over placebo (OR = 2.79, CI [95%] = 1.40-5.55, P = 0.01). Meanwhile, IVIg administration showed virtually identical effects to plasmapheresis (OR = 0.83, CI [95%] = 0.45-1.55, P < 0.01). Finally, no significant differences were found in the efficacy of IVIg and glucocorticoid administration (OR = 0.98, Cl [95%] = 0.58-1.68, P = 0.13).

CONCLUSION

IVIg can be regarded as a viable therapeutic approach, either as a first- or second-line therapy, and as an adjuvant therapy for autoimmune neurological diseases.

Update on Optic Neuritis: An International View

Previously, optic neuritis was thought to be typical, i.e. idiopathic or multiple sclerosis (MS) related, associated with a good visual prognosis, or atypical, i.e. not associated with MS and requiring corticosteroids or plasma exchange for vision to recover. More recently, the importance of optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody disease has become more appreciated. The results of the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial (ONTT) has influenced how optic neuritis is treated around the world. For this review we surveyed the international literature on optic neuritis in adults. Our aims were first to find the reported incidence of optic neuritis in different countries and to ascertain what percentage of cases were seropositive for anti-aquaporin 4 and anti-MOG antibodies, and second, to document the presenting features, treatment, and outcomes from a first episode of the different types of optic neuritis from these countries, and to compare the results with the outcomes of the ONTT cohort. From these data we have sought to highlight where ambiguities currently lie in how to manage optic neuritis and have made recommendations as to how future treatment trials in optic neuritis should be carried out in the current antibody testing era.