Autoimmune pancreatitis: with special reference to a localized variant

Endoscopic ultrasonography for microvascular imaging without contrast enhancement in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions

OBJECTIVES

Detective flow imaging endoscopic ultrasonography (DFI-EUS) is a recent imaging modality developed for detecting fine vessels without the need for ultrasound contrast agents. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of DFI-EUS for solid pancreatic lesions and to compare the diagnostic ability for pancreatic cancer (PC) between DFI-EUS, directional power Doppler (eFLOW) EUS, and contrast-enhanced harmonic (CH)-EUS.

METHODS

Patients with a pancreatic lesion who underwent DFI-EUS, eFLOW-EUS, and CH-EUS between March 2019 and November 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Final diagnoses were confirmed by pathologic examination of EUS-guided tissue acquisition and/or resected specimens. Lesions were categorized into the three patterns of poor, mild, and rich vascularity on DFI-EUS and eFLOW-EUS, and hypo-, iso-, and hypervascular on CH-EUS. PC was defined as a poor pattern on DFI-EUS and eFLOW-EUS, and a hypovascular pattern on CH-EUS.

RESULTS

The final diagnoses of 90 examined tumors were PC (n = 57), inflammatory mass (n = 6), autoimmune pancreatitis (n = 13), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 9), and others (n = 5). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosis of PC were 93%, 82%, and 88%, respectively, on DFI-EUS, 97%, 42%, and 77% on eFLOW-EUS, and 95%, 89%, and 92% on CH-EUS. The accuracy of DFI-EUS was significantly superior to eFLOW-EUS (P = 0.005), but no significant difference was found between DFI-EUS and CH-EUS.

CONCLUSION

DFI-EUS is more sensitive for depicting vasculature than eFLOW-EUS, and has higher diagnostic sensitivity for PC. Evaluation of vascularity on DFI-EUS is useful for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions without the need for intravenous contrast agent.

Role of transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

The most important thing in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is to suspect the possibility of AIP. In the acute phase, diffuse pancreatic enlargement is a highly specific finding of AIP compared to focal enlargement. Though the sensitivity is low, high-frequency transducers can detect the capsule-like rim sign and penetrating duct sign. Those findings are characteristic of AIP and useful for differential diagnosis with pancreatic carcinoma. In focal AIP, both contrast-enhanced US showing iso/hypervascularity and elastography showing increased stiffness not only in the focal enlargement but also in the surrounding parenchyma are also useful for differential diagnosis. Furthermore, changes over time after the two-week steroid trial, such as resolution or measurable reduction in parenchymal enlargement and a decrease in the mean shear-wave velocity on elastography, are also cardinal features of AIP. Since AIP is a pancreatic manifestation in immunoglobulin G4-related disease, evaluation of other organs, including the biliary tract and salivary glands, is particularly useful in focal AIP. A characteristic US finding of bile ducts is three-layered (high-low-high pattern) wall thickening with a markedly thickened middle layer. US can also detect wall thickening of bile ducts, which show no abnormalities on cholangiography. These findings are useful for differential diagnosis with cholangiocarcinoma. Multiple hypoechoic areas in submandibular glands are characteristic US findings of sialadenitis in type 1 AIP, and the sensitivity is higher than that of physical examination. US can further contribute to the diagnosis of AIP by employing elastography and contrast-enhanced US in addition to high-frequency transducers.

From Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestation, and Diagnosis to Treatment: An Overview on Autoimmune Pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a special type of chronic pancreatitis which is autoimmune mediated. The international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) 2011 proposed two types of AIP: type I is associated with histological pattern of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP), characterized by serum IgG4 elevation, whereas type 2 is named idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP), with granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL) and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) negative. The pathogenic mechanism is unclear now; based on genetic factors, disease specific or related antigens, innate and adaptive immunity may be involved. The most common clinical manifestations of AIP are obstructive jaundice and upper abdominal pain. The diagnosis can be made by a combination of parenchymal and ductal imaging, serum IgG4 concentrations, pancreatic histology, extrapancreatic disease, and glucocorticoid responsiveness according to ICDC 2011. Because of the clinical and imaging similarities with pancreatic cancer, general work-up should be done carefully to exclude pancreatic malignant tumor before empirical trial of glucocorticoid treatment. Glucocorticoid is the most common drug for AIP to induce remission, while there still exists controversy on steroid maintenance and treatment for relapse. Further studies should be done to identify more specific serum biomarkers for AIP, the pathogenic mechanisms, and the treatment for relapse.

Two cases of immunoglobulin G4-related sclerosing cholangitis in which transabdominal ultrasonography was useful in diagnosis and follow-up observation

Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) represents a group of disorders that share features of inflammation, plasma cell infiltrates, and fibrosis. Sclerosing cholangitis is a disorder involving inflammation, scarring, and destruction of the bile ducts. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC) has been proposed as a bile duct lesion associated with IgG4-RD. This disease entity can be distinguished from other types of sclerosing cholangitis and classified into four types based upon the region of strictures revealed by cholangiography. Here, we present two cases in which the finding of bile duct wall thickening visualized with transabdominal ultrasonography was useful in the diagnosis of patients with IgG4-SC. At present, transabdominal ultrasonography is not included in the diagnostic algorithm for IgG4-SC. We are certain that detailed observation of the bile duct wall with transabdominal ultrasonography can make a significant contribution to the diagnosis of IgG4-SC. Furthermore, we propose that transabdominal ultrasonography may be useful in following clinical improvement in cases where a steroid trial is the best option for treatment. Both cases emphasize the practicality of transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis and follow-up observation of IgG4-SC.

Natural history of pancreatitis-induced splenic vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of its incidence and rate of gastrointestinal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Pancreatitis-induced splenic vein thrombosis (PISVT) is an acquired anatomic abnormality that impacts decision making in pancreatic surgery. Despite this influence, its incidence and the rate of associated gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding are imprecisely known.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched from their inception to June 2010 for abstracts documenting PISVT in acute (AP) or chronic pancreatitis (CP). Two reviewers independently graded abstracts for inclusion in this review. Heterogeneity in combining data was assumed prior to pooling. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate percentages and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

After review of 241 abstracts, 47 studies and 52 case reports were graded as relevant. These represent a cohort of 805 patients with PISVT reported in the literature. A meta-analysis of studies meeting inclusion criteria shows mean incidences of PISVT of 14.1% in all patients, 22.6% in patients with AP and 12.4% in patients with CP. The incidence of associated splenomegaly was only 51.9% in these patients. Varices were identified in 53.0% of patients and were gastric in 77.3% of cases. The overall rate of GI bleeding was 12.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although reported incidences of PISVT vary widely across studies, an overall incidence of 14.1% is reported. Splenomegaly is an unreliable sign of PISVT. Although the true natural history of PISVT remains unknown, the collective reported rate of associated GI bleeding is 12.3%.