Team deliberate practice in medicine and related domains: a consideration of the issues

Preparing for practice, the effects of repeated immersive simulation on the knowledge and self-efficacy of undergraduate nursing students: A mixed methods study

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two immersive simulation-based education instructional designs, immersive simulation with team deliberate practice and immersive repeated standard simulation, when delivered over the same time on the knowledge and self-efficacy of nursing students.

BACKGROUND

Implementing immersive simulation-based education is not without its resource challenges, making it prohibitive for simulation educators to include it in their curricula. Subsequently, there is a need to identify instructional designs that meet these challenges.

DESIGN

A two-stage mixed methods approach was used to compare the two instructional designs.

METHODS

In stage one, data were collected using questionnaires and differences estimated using analysis of covariance. In stage two, data were collected from two focus groups and analysed using a qualitative content analysis approach. Data were collected as part of a doctoral study completed in 2019 and was analysed for this study between 2022 and 2023. The justification for this study was that the identification of effective designs for immersive simulation remains a key research priority following the increase in allowable simulation hours by the Nursing and Midwifery Council.

RESULTS

In stage one, there was no statistical significance in the participant's knowledge or self-efficacy between the models. In stage two, four themes were identified: vulnerability, development of knowledge, development of self-efficacy and preparation for placement. In contrast to stage one, participants reported that the repeated nature of both designs reinforced their knowledge base increased their self-efficacy, reduced their anxiety levels, and helped them to prepare for placement.

CONCLUSION

The results inferred that both designs had a positive impact on the participants. Overall, participants reported that it helped them prepare for placements. Based on the findings, wherever possible, repeated immersive simulation-based education designs should be used and not a standalone immersive simulation-based education scenarios. If resources allow, this could be either a repeated scenario, or if there are resource constraints to use, over the same time, immersive simulation with team deliberate practice, or a similar model. Thus, giving a potential return on investment, one that supports simulation educators making those sensitive decisions regarding the inclusion of immersive simulation with team deliberate practice in their curriculum. Further research is needed into this area to ascertain the design features that maximise this impact and support a move away from standalone scenarios to an approach that uses repetitive immersive simulation.

Protected 911: Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Prehospital COVID-19 High-Risk Response Team

Patients with COVID-19 who require aerosol-generating medical procedures (such as endotracheal intubation) are challenging for paramedic services. Although potentially lifesaving for patients, aerosolizing procedures carry an increased risk of infection for paramedics, owing to the resource limitations and complexities of the pre-hospital setting. In this paper, we describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a novel pre-hospital COVID-19 High-Risk Response Team (HRRT) in Peel Region in Ontario, Canada. The mandate of the HRRT was to attend calls for patients likely to require aerosolizing procedures, with the twofold goal of mitigating against COVID-19 infections in the service while continuing to provide skilled resuscitative care to patients. Modelled after in-hospital 'protected code blue' teams, operationalizing the HRRT required several significant changes to standard paramedic practice, including the use of a three-person crew configuration, dedicated safety officer, call-response checklists, multiple redundant safety procedures, and enhanced personal protective equipment. Less than three weeks after the mandate was given, the HRRT was operational for a 12-week period during the first wave of COVID-19 in Ontario. HRRT members attended ~70% of calls requiring high risk procedures and were associated with improved quality of care indicators. No paramedics in the service contracted COVID-19 during the program.

Effects of shared mental models in teams performing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Important non-technical skills enable operating teams to establish shared mental models (SMMs). The importance of SMMs in regards to surgical performance and peri-operative outcomes remains to be investigated. The aim of this study was to explore whether shared mental models (SMMs) of team resources and the current situation, respectively, were predictive of technical skills, duration of surgery, and amount of intra-operative bleeding in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

METHODS

A prospective multi-center observational study was conducted at four tertiary academic hospitals during VATS lobectomy procedures. Data included pre-operative and post-operative questionnaires answered by each of the six team members to measure the SMMs; thoracoscopic video recordings assessed using the previously validated VATS lobectomy Assessment Tool (VATSAT); surgery-related time stamps; and amount (volume) of intra-operative bleeding. Linear regression analyses were conducted to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight lobectomy procedures were included. Median (interquartile range) VATSAT score was 33.3 (scale 8-40) duration of surgery 101 min (88-123), and amount of intra-operative bleeding 100 ml (20-150). The mean (± SD) of teams' SMMs of the current situation was 20 (± 5). They were not predictive of the surgeons' technical skills, but every one point increase in SMM score significantly predicted a 1 min 52 s decrease in duration of surgery and an 11% decrease in amount of bleeding. The SMMs of team resources were not predictive of any outcomes.

CONCLUSION

VATS teams' superior SMMs of the current situation related to significantly shorter duration of surgery and decreased intra-operative bleeding, indicating an effect on team performance and patient care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02999113 at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov .

Teaching in Orthopaedic Surgery: Effective Strategies for Educating the Modern Learner in a Modern Surgical Practice

Prioritizing the education of orthopaedic surgery residents and fellows is essential for the future of the field. This review highlights strategies that educators may find useful in improving their teaching skills for the modern orthopaedic surgery learner. Educators may benefit from focusing on active, effortful, and repetitive engagement in lecture; setting clear expectations to help track progress in clinic; and breaking skills into smaller steps in context of a framework when teaching procedural skills. Providing objective assessment and growth-oriented feedback helps establish a close rapport between educator and trainee while encouraging personal development. Through a remediation process that examines deficiency in core areas and equitability of the learning environment, the trainee and the educator may engage in a fair discussion that prevents trainees from falling behind. Finally, in the era of COVID-19, e-learning and virtual simulations have become increasingly used as effective modalities for teaching clinical knowledge and procedures to trainees. The medical education landscape has been changing at a rapid pace, and by evaluating and adapting to the novel educational models of today, the modern orthopaedic surgeon ensures a learning environment that is equitable, effective, and inspiring for the orthopaedic surgeon of tomorrow.

The use of a stronger instructional design by implementing repetitive practice in simulation-based obstetric team training: trainees' satisfaction

Objective

This study compares satisfaction levels from multiprofessional obstetric care teams about simulation-based obstetric team training courses with and without the instructional design feature repetitive practice.

Methods

The present study is part of a multicentre cluster-randomised controlled trial (TOSTI trial) that investigated the effectiveness of a 1 day, multiprofessional, simulation-based obstetric team training. The initial training group received a training which was designed based on best practice. After 1 year, the control group received a training course in which the instructional design was changed by providing repetitive practice. All participants were asked to fill in a 29-item evaluation form with seven questions about baseline characteristics and 22 questions about training features. The questions about training features could be rated on a scale of 1 to 5. Finally, all participants were asked to rate the total training day on a scale of 1-10.

Results

The best practice group consisted of 471 trainees and the repetitive practice group of 549, including gynaecologists, residents, midwives and nurses. The best practice group rated the total training day significantly higher than the repetitive practice group (mean 8.8, SD 0.6 and mean 8.7, SD 0.6; p<0.003, Cohen's d=0.19). Several training features were also scored higher in the best practice group.

Conclusion

This study showed that obstetric healthcare professionals rated a simulation-based obstetric team training course, with and without repetition of scenarios, both high. The training without the repetitive elements gained higher scores for the total training dayand several, and several training features were scored higher. The difference between the mean scores and the effect sizes for the training features were small. This implies that repetitive practice can be integrated in simulation-based team training to optimise learning effects, with small effects on trainees satisfaction.

Using Simulation With Deliberate Practice to Improve Pediatric ICU Nurses' Knowledge, Clinical Teamwork, and Confidence

PURPOSE

The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement an educational intervention involving High-Fidelity Simulation (HFS) with deliberate practice for low-frequency, high-impact events in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), with the goal of improving nurses' crisis management skills.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Four interprofessional simulation education sessions with scenarios were created for this project. A list of knowledge and skills points was used to guide debriefings. All scenarios were based on low-frequency, high-impact events that required the use of Pediatric Advanced Life Support algorithms. Participants included 24 PICU nurses with less than two years of nursing experience. Knowledge and confidence were measured at three timepoints: pre-simulation, one-week post-simulation, and one-month post-simulation series. Clinical teamwork performance was measured twice, during the first and second scenario of each simulation session.

RESULTS

Scores for knowledge, confidence, and clinical teamwork performance improved from pre- to post-simulation, with confidence scores showing the largest increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular simulation training with deliberate practice can improve PICU nurses' knowledge, clinical teamwork skills, and confidence when managing low-frequency, high-impact events.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Regular in-situ simulation training with deliberate practice can improve nursing comfort with managing high-impact, low-frequency events in the PICU. This could lead to improved management of actual events, especially for novice nurses with less than one year of PICU experience.

Effects of the Simulation Using Team Deliberate Practice (Sim-TDP) model on the performance of undergraduate nursing students

Background

The use of simulation has grown in prominence, but variation in the quality of provision has been reported, leading to calls for further research into the most effective instructional designs. Simulation Using Team Deliberate Practice (Sim-TDP) was developed in response. It combines the principles of simulation with deliberate practice, therefore, providing participants with opportunities to work towards well-defined goals, rehearse skills and reflect on performance whilst receiving expert feedback. This study aimed to compare the effects of Sim-TDP, versus the use of traditional simulation, on the performance of second year adult nursing students.

Methods

Using a longitudinal quasi-experimental design, the effects of the two approaches were compared over a 1-year period. Sixteen groups, each containing an average of six participants, were randomised into an intervention arm (n=8) or comparison arm (n=8). Data collection took place at 3 monthly intervals, at which point the performance and time to complete the scenario objectives/tasks, as a team, were recorded and analysed using a validated performance tool.

Results

The independent t-tests, comparing the performance of the groups, did not demonstrate any notable differences during the three phases. However, in phase 1, the independent t-tests suggested an improvement in the Sim-TDP participants’ time spent on task (t(14) = 5.12, p<0.001), with a mean difference of 7.22 min. The mixed analysis of covariance inferred that the use of the Sim-TDP led to an improvement, over time, in the participants’ performance (F(1, 5) = 12.91, p=0.016), and thus, an association between Sim-TDP and the enhanced performance of participants.

Conclusion

The results suggest that Sim-TDP, potentially, optimised participant performance, while maximising the use of Simulation-based education (SBE) resources, such as simulation facilities and equipment. The model could be of practical benefit to nurse educators wishing to integrate SBE into their programmes.

Designing authentic simulations in ROSE and EBUS for undergraduate laboratory medicine students

Introduction

Simulation-based education (SBE) has successfully been implemented in several healthcare professions, more so in the fields of medicine and nursing. Laboratory medicine courses prepare medical scientists for employment in pathology laboratories typically via a staged training regime. Laboratory techniques related to the diagnostic disciplines are introduced to students in a graduated fashion over time for the development of professional skills and technical competencies. For students specialising in diagnostic cytology, there are continual changes to the scope of practice of scientists in industry that require advanced training at undergraduate level to meet expectations of contemporary laboratory testing.

Methods

The National Health Education and Training in Simulation (NHET-Sim) framework was applied to create and deliver bespoke simulations for laboratory medicine students. This paper outlines the steps taken, including working with actors and industry partners, to create simulations which contextualise the pressures and team interactions during diagnostic procedures.

Findings

Supported by a range of expertise and personnel, five laboratory medicine simulations were developed and delivered to final year students. Details of the steps taken and range of scenarios are included for sharing and discussion.

Discussion

SBE can contribute positively to student confidence in communication at interdisciplinary and interprofessional levels in ways that can be essential to successful patient management. Understanding that cytology has now evolved to become part of a multidisciplinary approach to patient-centred care will improve the overall patient outcome and experience to personalised medicine.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates how a high-fidelity SBE scenario can test students’ decision-making around technical, clinical and diagnostic competencies in a complex investigation that they would likely experience in industry.

Exploring the Role and Application of the Deliberate Practice Concept in Radiation Therapy

The concept of deliberate practice (DP) has been extensively applied to the development of skill and expert performance in many domains of professional practice. Although it has been widely reviewed in other health professions, there is a lack of evidence on its application in radiation therapy practice. This article aims to explore the concept of DP and how it can be applied to radiation therapy practice. The authors define DP, why it is essential, and how it can be implemented in radiation therapy. Evidence from the DP literature in the health professions was used to clarify the guiding principles for successful DP implementation within both the clinical and educational contexts. While the authors encourage radiation therapy practitioners to engage in DP approaches, every profession utilizing DP will develop strategies unique to the individual discipline. Hence, rather than imitating other professions, it is essential that radiation therapists engage evidence-based approaches that will generate empirical evidence to model radiation therapy-specific DP approaches.