Evidence for risk reduction among amphetamine-injecting men who have sex with men; results from national HIV behavioral surveillance surveys in the Seattle area 2008-2012

Trends and correlates of naloxone possession and use among people who inject drugs in Seattle, Washington

BACKGROUND

Naloxone distribution has been implemented as an essential opioid overdose prevention measure for people who inject drugs (PWID), and many jurisdictions in the United States have implemented policy change to increase naloxone access. This project describes temporal trends in and correlates of naloxone possession and use among PWID in the Seattle area of Washington State.

METHODS

Using a repeat cross-sectional design, we utilized two sets of serial cross-sectional surveys of PWID, which included biennial surveys of Seattle area syringe service program (SSP) clients and community-based National HIV Behavioral Surveillance surveys of PWID (NHBS-PWID) conducted from 2012-2019. Survey participant characteristics were descriptively compared between participants reporting naloxone possession to those not reporting naloxone possession. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to calculate prevalence ratios for naloxone possession comparing later to earlier survey years, adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, primary drug, and experiencing and witnessing an overdose in the past 12 months.

RESULTS

Naloxone possession and use increased in both survey populations. The prevalence of possessing naloxone was 2.8 times greater [2019 vs. 2013= 95% CI: 2.40-3.33] among SSP participants and 2.8 times greater [2018 vs. 2012=95% CI: 2.41-3.16] among NHBS-PWID participants for the most recent time period. The prevalence of naloxone use was 1.3 times greater [2019 vs. 2017= 95% CI: 1.13-1.58] and 2.1 times greater [2015 vs. 2012=95% CI:1.62-2.73] among SSP and NHBS-PWID participants, respectively, for the most recent time period.

CONCLUSION

Naloxone possession and use increased in PWID in the Seattle area from 2012-2019, and is, at least in part, likely the result of numerous policy and programmatic efforts to facilitate easier naloxone accessibility in the wake of dramatic increases in overdose mortality. Further research on disparities in naloxone possession are needed to ensure equitable access.

Gender, sexual orientation identity, and initiation of amphetamine injecting among people who inject drugs: Examination of an expanding drug era in Montreal, Canada, 2011-19

BACKGROUND

Amphetamine injection is expanding in North America and has been associated with male homosexuality among people who inject drugs (PWID). Applying subcultural evolution theory, we examined overall and gender-stratified trends in amphetamine injection and assessed sexual orientation as a gender-specific predictor of initiation among PWID in Montreal, Canada.

METHODS

Data were from HEPCO, an open prospective cohort of PWID. Gender and sexual orientation were self-identified at enrolment. Interviewer-administered questionnaires at three-monthly (HCV RNA-negative participants) or yearly (RNA-positive) intervals captured past three-month amphetamine injection and covariates. Annual prevalence and linear trends in amphetamine injection were estimated using GEE. Incidence was computed among naïve individuals and hazard ratios for initiation estimated using gender-stratified, time-varying Cox regression models.

RESULTS

803 participants contributed 8096 observations between March 2011 and December 2019. Annual prevalence of amphetamine injecting increased from 3.25% [95%CI: 2.06-4.43%] to 12.7% [9.50-16.0] (trend p<0.001). Bivariate Cox regression models suggested similar and divergent predictors of initiation by gender. Incidence was 3.27 per 100 person-years [95%CI: 2.51-4.18] among heterosexual men, 7.18 [3.50-13.2] among gay/bisexual men, 1.93 [0.78-4.02] among heterosexual women and 5.30 [1.69-12.8] among gay/bisexual women. Among men, gay/bisexual identity doubled risk of initiation after adjusting for age, ethnicity, calendar year (aHR 2.16 [1.07-4.36]) and additional covariates (2.56 [1.24-5.30]). Among women, evidence for an association with gay/bisexual identity was inconclusive (aHR 2.63 [0.62-11.2]) and sample size precluded further adjustment CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of amphetamine injection among PWID increased four-fold from 2011 to 2019, with elevated risk of initiation in gay and bisexual men.

Geographic Distribution of HIV Transmission Networks in the United States

BACKGROUND

Understanding geographic patterns of HIV transmission is critical to designing effective interventions. We characterized geographic proximity by transmission risk and urban-rural characteristics among people with closely related HIV strains suggestive of potential transmission relationships.

METHODS

We analyzed US National HIV Surveillance System data of people diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 with a reported HIV-1 partial polymerase nucleotide sequence. We used HIV TRAnsmission Cluster Engine (HIV-TRACE) to identify sequences linked at a genetic distance of ≤0.5%. For each linked person, we assessed median distances between counties of residence at diagnosis by transmission category and urban-rural classification, weighting observations to account for persons with multiple linked sequences.

RESULTS

There were 24,743 persons with viral sequence linkages to at least one other person included in this analysis. Overall, half (50.9%) of persons with linked viral sequences resided in different counties, and the median distance from persons with linked viruses was 11 km/7 miles [interquartile range (IQR), 0-145 km/90 miles]. Median distances were highest for men who have sex with men (MSM: 14 km/9 miles; IQR, 0-179 km/111 miles) and MSM who inject drugs, and median distances increased with increasing rurality (large central metro: 0 km/miles; IQR, 0-83 km/52 miles; nonmetro: 103 km/64 miles; IQR, 40 km/25 miles-316 km/196 miles).

CONCLUSION

Transmission networks in the United States involving MSM, MSM who inject drugs, or persons living in small metro and nonmetro counties may be more geographically dispersed, highlighting the importance of coordinated health department efforts for comprehensive follow-up and linkage to care.

Methamphetamine use and HIV risk behavior among men who inject drugs: causal inference using coarsened exact matching

BACKGROUND

Understanding the association between methamphetamine (MA) use and HIV risk behavior among people who inject drugs (PWID) will assist policy-makers and program managers to sharpen the focus of HIV prevention interventions. This study examines the relationship between MA use and HIV risk behavior among men who inject drugs (MWID) in Tehran, Iran, using coarsened exact matching (CEM).

METHODS

Data for these analyses were derived from a cross-sectional study conducted between June and July 2016. We assessed three outcomes of interest-all treated as binary variables, including distributive and receptive needle and syringe (NS) sharing and condomless sex during the month before interview. Our primary exposure of interest was whether study participants reported any MA use in the month prior to the interview. Firstly, we report the descriptive statistics for the pooled samples and matched sub-samples using CEM. The pooled and matched estimates of the associations and their 95% CI were estimated using a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Overall, 500 MWID aged between 18 and 63 years (mean = 28.44, SD = 7.22) were recruited. Imbalances in the measured demographic characteristics and risk behaviors between MA users and non-users were attenuated using matching. In the matched samples, the regression models showed participants who reported MA use were 1.82 times more likely to report condomless sex (OR = 1.82 95% CI 1.51, 4.10; P = 0.031), and 1.35 times more likely to report distributive NS sharing in the past 30 days, as compared to MA non-users (OR = 1.35 95% CI 1.15-1.81). Finally, there was a statistically significant relationship between MA use and receptive NS sharing in the past month. People who use MA in the last month had higher odds of receptive NS sharing when compared to MA non-users (OR = 4.2 95% CI 2.7, 7.5; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show a significant relationship between MA use and HIV risk behavior among MWID in Tehran, Iran. MA use was related with increased NS sharing, which is associated with higher risk for HIV exposure and transmission.

Injection drug use, unknown HIV positive status, and self-reported current PrEP use among Black men who have sex with men attending U.S. Black pride events, 2014-2017

OBJECTIVE

Black gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (BMSM) are at elevated risk for HIV infection in the United States. BMSM who inject drugs may be face even higher HIV risk.

METHODS

Random time-location sampling was used to survey BMSM attending Black Pride events in 6 U.S. cities about HIV risk and protective behaviors, including injection drug use, prior HIV testing, and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). 3429 individuals who reported a HIV negative/unknown serostatus at enrollment were included in the analysis. HIV status was determined by in-field rapid HIV testing.

RESULTS

3.6% of BMSM had injected drugs in their lifetime and 58.5% of BMSM who had injected drugs reported sharing syringes in the past six months. BMSM who had injected drugs more commonly reported current PrEP use than BMSM who had never injected (32.5% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001). BMSM who had injected drugs were 3.6-fold (95% CI: 2.4, 5.4) more likely to report currently using PrEP than BMSM who had never injected after adjustment for sociodemographic, substance use, and sexual risk characteristics. Among BMSM who reported ever injecting drugs (n = 123), 31.7% tested HIV positive. HIV prevalence did not differ by self-reported PrEP use among BMSM who had injected drugs (p = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

BMSM who inject drugs who reported currently using PrEP were no less likely to test positive for HIV than those who did not use PrEP. Wrap-around services to support consistent PrEP use and long-acting PrEP formulations may improve the effectiveness of PrEP among BMSM who inject drugs.

Test uptake and hepatitis C prevalence in 5483 Danish people in drug use treatment from 1996 to 2015: a registry-based cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The aims of this study were, in people in treatment for drug use in Funen, Denmark, to: (1) assess prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) test uptake and prevalence of HCV; (2) identify predictors of test update and HCV infection; and (3) characterize changes between 1996 and 2015 in test uptake, HCV prevalence and drug use.

DESIGN

Cohort study linking the Danish National Registry on Drug Users in Treatment to the regional hepatitis test registry and the Danish Death Certificate Registry, thus combining longitudinal data on drug use with data on HCV testing and results.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

People recorded as having received treatment for drug use between 1996 and 2015 (n = 5483) in Funen, Denmark. In the cohort, 24.8% were female, median age 23 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 20-32] at entry and 50% had self-reported injecting or had received opiate substitution therapy (OST).

MEASUREMENTS

The main outcomes were the test for HCV ever and latest HCV-RNA being positive. The main predictors were for test and infection investigated; ever receiving OST, self-reported injecting, age at entry and connection to treatment centre offering outreach hepatitis care.

FINDINGS

HCV test uptake was 52% and prevalence of current HCV-RNA+ was 21% in people alive at the end of follow-up. Positive predictors of having undergone HCV testing were: receiving OST [odds ratio (OR) = 3.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.2-4.5], self-reported injecting (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 2.0-2.7), female gender (OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.4-1.9) and having been connected to centres with outreach hepatitis care (OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.2-1.7). In people alive, HCV-RNA+ prevalence was 31% if ever on OST or self-reported injecting. Among HCV-infected people, 69% were in drug use treatment at end of follow-up. For participants entering the cohort after 2010, only 5% reported opiates as main drug of use and 17% had experience of injecting.

CONCLUSION

Among Danish people in treatment for drug use from 1996 to 2015, receiving opiate substitution therapy had the largest associating to being tested for hepatitis C virus. As opiate use is declining, adapting test strategies will be necessary.

HIV infection among MSM who inject methamphetamine in 8 US cities

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Men who have sex with men (MSM) and inject drugs are at risk for HIV infection. Although research exists on non-injection methamphetamine (meth) use and sexual risk among MSM, less is known about meth injection and its association with HIV infection among MSM who inject drugs.

METHODS

We analyzed data from men aged ≥18 years who reported injecting drugs and male-to-male sexual contact. Men were recruited using respondent-driven sampling, interviewed, and tested for HIV during the 2012 and 2015 cycles of National HIV Behavioral Surveillance among persons who inject drugs. We included data from 8 cities where ≥10 MSM reported meth as the primary drug injected. We assessed differences in demographic characteristics, past 12 months risk behaviors, and HIV infection between MSM who primarily injected meth and those who primarily injected another drug.

RESULTS

Among 961 MSM, 33.7% reported meth as the drug they injected most often. Compared to MSM who primarily injected other drugs, MSM who primarily injected meth were more likely to have had ≥5 condomless anal sex partners, have been diagnosed with syphilis, and were less likely to report sharing syringes. In multivariable analysis, injecting meth was associated with being HIV-positive (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.48; 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.03). Including number of condomless anal sex partners in mediation analysis rendered this association no longer significant.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV prevalence among MSM who primarily injected meth was almost 50% higher than among MSM who primarily injected other drugs, and this association was mediated by sexual risk.

Increasing methamphetamine injection among non-MSM who inject drugs in King County, Washington

BACKGROUND

In King County, Washington, the HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men (MSM) who inject methamphetamine is high, while it is low among other people who inject drugs (PWID). Local drug problem indicators suggest that methamphetamine use is increasing. The extent to which this increase affects MSM and non-MSM, and whether MSM and non-MSM networks are connected through injection equipment sharing, is unknown.

METHODS

We used data from two serial cross-sectional surveys of PWID including five biannual surveys of Public Health-Seattle and King County Needle and Syringe Exchange Program clients (NSEP, N=2135, 2009-2017) and three National HIV Behavioral Surveillance IDU surveys (NHBS, N=1709, 2009-2015).

RESULTS

The proportion of non-MSM PWID reporting any recent methamphetamine injection increased significantly from approximately 20% in 2009 to 65% in 2017. Most of this increase was attributable to injecting methamphetamine in combination with heroin (goofballs). PWID who injected goofballs were more likely to be younger, homeless or unstably housed, report daily injection, and self-report an opioid overdose in the past year than other PWID. The majority of PWID who injected methamphetamine reported sharing any injection equipment. Among these PWID, 43% of MSM had last shared injection equipment with a non-MSM. Eight percent of non-MSM men and 15% of women had last shared equipment with an MSM.

CONCLUSIONS

Given non-trivial rates of sharing injection equipment with methamphetamine-using MSM, a population with an HIV prevalence of 40%, non-MSM who inject methamphetamine could be an emerging population at risk for acquiring HIV.

A Decline in HIV Testing Among Persons Who Inject Drugs in the Seattle Area, 2004-2015

BACKGROUND

Promoting HIV testing is a key component of the public health response to HIV. Assessing HIV testing frequency among persons who inject drugs (PWID) monitors the status of these efforts and can identify unmet needs and opportunities to more effectively promote testing.

METHODS

Data were combined from 4 Seattle-area surveys of PWID from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) program (2005-2015) and 6 surveys of Needle Exchange clients (2004-2015).

RESULTS

The proportion of PWID reporting an HIV test in the previous 12 months declined from 64% in 2005% to 47% in 2015 in the NHBS surveys and from 72% to 58% in the Needle Exchange surveys. These declines persisted in multivariate analyses controlling for differences in the study populations in age, race, sex, area of residence, education, current homelessness, drug most frequently injected, daily injection frequency, and combined male-to-male sex and amphetamine injection status. The proportion of NHBS participants reporting not knowing the HIV status of their last injection partner increased from 38% to 45%. The proportion not knowing the HIV status of their last sex partner increased from 27% to 38%.

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in HIV testing was found in 2 independent Seattle-area study populations. This was complemented by increases in the proportions not knowing the HIV status of their last sex and last injection partners. Research is needed to ascertain if such declines are observed elsewhere, the reasons for the decline, and appropriate means to effectively attain optimal HIV testing frequency among PWID.

Reduction in Needle Sharing Among Seattle-Area Injection Drug Users Across 4 Surveys, 1994-2013

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated time trends in sharing needles and other injection equipment from 1994 to 2013 among injection drug users in the Seattle, Washington area.

METHODS

We combined data from 4 sources: the Risk Activity Variables, Epidemiology, and Network (RAVEN) study, recruited from institutional settings; the Kiwi study, recruited from jails; National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system (NHBS) surveys, which used respondent-driven sampling; and surveys at needle-exchange sites.

RESULTS

Levels of needle sharing were higher in the earlier studies: RAVEN, 1994 to 1997 (43%) and Kiwi, 1998 to 2002 (61%). In the NHBS surveys, the initial level of 44% in 2005 declined to 31% in the period 2009 to 2012. Across needle-exchange surveys (2009-2013) the level was 21%. There was a parallel reduction in sharing other injection equipment. These trends persisted after control for sociodemographic and risk-associated variables. There was a contemporaneous increase in the number of needles distributed by local needle exchanges and a decline in the number of reported HIV cases among injection drug users.

CONCLUSIONS

The apparent long-term reduction in sharing injection equipment suggests substantial success in public health efforts to reduce the sharing of injection equipment.

Assessing differences in groups randomized by recruitment chain in a respondent-driven sample of Seattle-area injection drug users

PURPOSE

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a form of peer-based study recruitment and analysis that incorporates features designed to limit and adjust for biases in traditional snowball sampling. It is being widely used in studies of hidden populations. We report an empirical evaluation of RDS's consistency and variability, comparing groups recruited contemporaneously, by identical methods and using identical survey instruments.

METHODS

We randomized recruitment chains from the RDS-based 2012 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance survey of injection drug users in the Seattle area into two groups and compared them in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, drug-associated risk behaviors, sexual risk behaviors, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status and HIV testing frequency.

RESULTS

The two groups differed in five of the 18 variables examined (P ≤ .001): race (e.g., 60% white vs. 47%), gender (52% male vs. 67%), area of residence (32% downtown Seattle vs. 44%), an HIV test in the previous 12 months (51% vs. 38%). The difference in serologic HIV status was particularly pronounced (4% positive vs. 18%). In four further randomizations, differences in one to five variables attained this level of significance, although the specific variables involved differed.

CONCLUSIONS

We found some material differences between the randomized groups. Although the variability of the present study was less than has been reported in serial RDS surveys, these findings indicate caution in the interpretation of RDS results.