1
|
Xu HG, Keogh S, Ullman AJ, Marsh N, Tobiano G, Rickard CM, Clark J, Griffin B. Implementation frameworks, strategies and outcomes used in peripheral intravenous catheter studies: A systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:6706-6722. [PMID: 36970881 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to critically evaluate implementation frameworks, strategies and/or outcomes used to optimise peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) care and/or promote guideline adherence. BACKGROUND Although a considerable volume of research has investigated the effectiveness of PIVC interventions and treatments to promote performance and prevent harm, how to best implement this evidence into dynamic clinical settings and populations is not well understood. Implementation science is central to translating evidence-based knowledge to the bedside; however, there is a gap in identifying the best implementation framework, strategies and/or outcomes to optimise PIVC care and/or guideline adherence. DESIGN A systematic review. METHOD The review was conducted using innovative automation tools. Five databases and clinical trial registries were searched on 14 October 2021. Qualitative and quantitative PIVC intervention studies reporting implementation strategies were included in the review. Data were extracted independently by experienced researchers in pairs. The Mixed Method Appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of individual studies. Narrative synthesis was used to present the findings. The systematic review was reported following the PRISMA checklist. RESULTS Of 2189 references identified, 27 studies were included in the review. Implementation frameworks were used in 30% (n = 8) of studies, with most used during the preparation (n = 7, 26%) and delivery phase (n = 7, 26%) and then evaluation phase (n = 4, 15%). Multifaceted strategies were commonly adopted (n = 24, 89%) to promote PIVC care or study interventions which were clinician (n = 25, 93%) and patient-targeted (n = 15, 56%). The most commonly reported implementation outcomes were fidelity (n = 13, 48%) and adoption (n = 6, 22%). Most studies were scored as low quality (n = 18, 67%). CONCLUSION We call for researchers and clinicians to work together and use implementation science frameworks to guide study design, implementation and evaluation in future PIVC studies, to improve evidence translation and thereby improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Grace Xu
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence (CRE) in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Emergency Department, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Samantha Keogh
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amanda J Ullman
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence (CRE) in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nicole Marsh
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Georgia Tobiano
- NHMRC CRE in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Claire M Rickard
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence (CRE) in Wiser Wound Care, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Justin Clark
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Bronwyn Griffin
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Amano T, Hooley C, Strong J, Inoue M. Strategies for implementing music-based interventions for people with dementia in long-term care facilities: A systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2022; 37. [PMID: 34647348 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Research has found that music-based interventions can decrease behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia or behaviors that challenge (BPSD/BtC). However, how to effectively implement these interventions is unclear. This study synthesizes available evidence regarding implementation strategies and outcomes of music-based interventions for people with dementia at residential long-term care facilities. METHODS Study registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42020194354). We searched the following databases: PsychInfo, PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria included articles targeting music-based interventions conducted for people with dementia, studies conducted in residential long-term care facilities, and articles that reported implementation strategies and outcomes of the intervention. RESULTS Of the included eight studies, half were studies of music therapy and the other half were on individualized music. 49 implementation strategies were reported. The most frequently reported category of strategies was planning (34.7%), followed by education (24.5%), quality management (24.5%), restructuring (12.2%), and finance (4.1%). No strategies under the category of attending to the policy context were reported. The most frequently reported implementation outcomes were appropriateness (27.3%), followed by adoption (22.7%), fidelity (22.7%), acceptability (9.1%), sustainability (9.1%), and cost (9.1%). No studies measured feasibility or penetration. CONCLUSIONS Although various effective implementation strategies were identified, we were unable to examine the effectiveness of individual implementation strategies due to the designs of the selected studies. Less attention has been paid to strategies that aim at structural changes of intervention delivery systems. Future studies should investigate facilitators and barriers of implementing music-based interventions especially focusing on structural aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Amano
- Rutgers University - Newark, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Joe Strong
- University of North Carolina - Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|