The Effect of Solution-Oriented Counseling on Coping Strategies in Mental Health Issues in Women with Gestational Diabetes

Self-care interventions among women with gestational diabetes mellitus in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a transitory form of diabetes occurring in pregnancy with maternal and neonatal health consequences if left untreated. GDM can, in most instances, be managed non-medically through self-care practices, such as eating healthy or engaging in physical activity. This is especially relevant in a global health context with scarce resources. There is no official definition of "GDM self-care"; hence, the content and delivery modes of such interventions may vary greatly. Therefore, this study aimed to landscape GDM self-care interventions in low- and middle-income countries according to the WHO's three dimensions of health.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Global Health Library, and Web of Science were searched for published intervention studies that compared the effect of a self-care intervention to standard care or had no comparator. Studies that targeted women with GDM that reported maternal health and/or neonatal health outcomes (physical, mental, and social health outcomes) and were conducted in low- and middle-income countries were included in the review.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies (randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies) were included in the review. No studies were conducted in low-income countries, and studies were primarily conducted in Asia. Most interventions were complex and contained several interacting elements in relation to content, delivery mode, duration, and modality. Most interventions aimed to improve the physical health dimension (n = 28; 96.6%), whilst the mental health (n = 11; 37.9%) and social health dimensions (n = 9; 31.0%) were addressed to a lesser extent.

CONCLUSIONS

Current GDM self-care interventions in LMICs are complex, and the content of self-care interventions overlaps with lifestyle and non-pharmaceutical interventions. It is recommended that the scientific community use a standardised terminology for such interventions and that future GDM intervention studies, as a minimum, use the core outcome set for GDM when developing future studies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

OSF Registries (2 December 2022) [ https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PJZQ3 ].

Coping, wellbeing, and psychopathology during high-risk pregnancy: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Complications during pregnancy can negatively impact the physical and psychological wellbeing of mothers. This systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence which has examined the impact of high-risk conditions developed during pregnancy on women's coping, wellbeing, and symptoms of psychopathology.

DATA SOURCES

Medline (Ovid), PsycINFO (ProQuest), Scopus, Web of science, AMED (Ebsco), CINAHL (Ebsco) and ProQuest databases were searched in May 2021 with no restrictions on publication date.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language literature was reviewed to identify 31 articles.

DATA EXTRACTION

Fifteen articles examined Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM: 48%), nine examined multiple high-risk pregnancy conditions (29%), four examined Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, Preeclampsia (PE: 13%), two did not specify the condition examined (7%), and one examined Pregnancy-Related Acute Kidney Injury (PR-AKI: 3%). The most common study design was quantitative, non-randomised, and survey-based.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-seven articles (87%) reported a high-risk pregnancy resulted in decreased wellbeing and ability to cope, and increased symptoms of psychopathology. The remaining four articles (13%) reported no difference in wellbeing or psychopathology outcomes for women experiencing high-risk compared to healthy pregnancies. Moreover, hypertensive disorders and GDM were associated with ineffective submissive or avoidant coping, reduced wellbeing, and quality-of-life, and exacerbated symptoms of anxiety and depression.

CONCLUSION

High-risk pregnancy negatively impacts coping, wellbeing, and psychopathology, and preventive and supportive interventions to mitigate this should focus on empowering women to feel optimistic and in control of their pregnancy. A holistic and culturally sensitive approach is recommended, where pregnant women (and their partners or support people) are involved in healthcare decisions, thus promoting wellbeing, coping, satisfaction, and improved treatment outcome.

Quality of patient-reported outcome reporting in trials of diabetes in pregnancy: A systematic review

AIMS

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are reports of the patient's health status that come directly from the patient without interpretation by the clinician or anyone else. They are increasingly used in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In this systematic review we identified RCTs conducted in women with diabetes in pregnancy which included PROs in their primary or secondary outcomes. We then evaluated the quality of PRO reporting against an internationally accepted reporting framework (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT-PRO) guidelines).

METHODS

We searched online databases for studies published 2013-2021 using a combination of keywords. Two authors reviewed all abstracts independently. Data on study characteristics and the quality of PRO reporting were extracted from relevant studies. We conducted a multiple regression analysis to identify factors associated with high quality reporting.

RESULTS

We identified 7122 citations. Thirty-five articles were included for review. Only 17% of RCTs included a PRO as a primary or secondary outcome. Out of a maximum score of 100 the median score was 46, indicating sub-optimal reporting. A multiple regression analysis did not reveal any factors associated with high quality reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers should be mindful of the importance of PRO inclusion and reporting and include reliable PROs in trials.