2
|
Haubrock PJ, Ahmed DA, Cuthbert RN, Stubbington R, Domisch S, Marquez JRG, Beidas A, Amatulli G, Kiesel J, Shen LQ, Soto I, Angeler DG, Bonada N, Cañedo-Argüelles M, Csabai Z, Datry T, de Eyto E, Dohet A, Drohan E, England J, Feio MJ, Forio MAE, Goethals P, Graf W, Heino J, Hudgins EJ, Jähnig SC, Johnson RK, Larrañaga A, Leitner P, L'Hoste L, Lizee MH, Maire A, Rasmussen JJ, Schäfer RB, Schmidt-Kloiber A, Vannevel R, Várbíró G, Wiberg-Larsen P, Haase P. Invasion impacts and dynamics of a European-wide introduced species. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2022; 28:4620-4632. [PMID: 35570183 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Globalization has led to the introduction of thousands of alien species worldwide. With growing impacts by invasive species, understanding the invasion process remains critical for predicting adverse effects and informing efficient management. Theoretically, invasion dynamics have been assumed to follow an "invasion curve" (S-shaped curve of available area invaded over time), but this dynamic has lacked empirical testing using large-scale data and neglects to consider invader abundances. We propose an "impact curve" describing the impacts generated by invasive species over time based on cumulative abundances. To test this curve's large-scale applicability, we used the data-rich New Zealand mud snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum, one of the most damaging freshwater invaders that has invaded almost all of Europe. Using long-term (1979-2020) abundance and environmental data collected across 306 European sites, we observed that P. antipodarum abundance generally increased through time, with slower population growth at higher latitudes and with lower runoff depth. Fifty-nine percent of these populations followed the impact curve, characterized by first occurrence, exponential growth, then long-term saturation. This behaviour is consistent with boom-bust dynamics, as saturation occurs due to a rapid decline in abundance over time. Across sites, we estimated that impact peaked approximately two decades after first detection, but the rate of progression along the invasion process was influenced by local abiotic conditions. The S-shaped impact curve may be common among many invasive species that undergo complex invasion dynamics. This provides a potentially unifying approach to advance understanding of large-scale invasion dynamics and could inform timely management actions to mitigate impacts on ecosystems and economies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip J Haubrock
- Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Gelnhausen, Germany
- University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Vodňany, Czech Republic
| | - Danish A Ahmed
- Center for Applied Mathematics and Bioinformatics (CAMB), Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Gulf University for Science and Technology, Hawally, Kuwait
| | - Ross N Cuthbert
- GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Kiel, Germany
- School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Rachel Stubbington
- School of Science & Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sami Domisch
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Department Community and Ecosystem Ecology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jaime R G Marquez
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Department Community and Ecosystem Ecology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ayah Beidas
- Center for Applied Mathematics and Bioinformatics (CAMB), Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Gulf University for Science and Technology, Hawally, Kuwait
| | - Giuseppe Amatulli
- Yale University, School of the Environment, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Jens Kiesel
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Department Community and Ecosystem Ecology, Berlin, Germany
- Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Institute for Natural Resource Conservation, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Kiel, Germany
| | - Longzhu Q Shen
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Department Community and Ecosystem Ecology, Berlin, Germany
- Carnegie Mellon University, Institute for Green Science, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ismael Soto
- University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Vodňany, Czech Republic
| | - David G Angeler
- Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
- School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
| | - Núria Bonada
- Freshwater Ecology, Hydrology and Management, Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Facultat de Biologia, Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles
- Freshwater Ecology, Hydrology and Management, Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Facultat de Biologia, Institut de Recerca de l'Aigua (IdRA), Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Zoltán Csabai
- Department of Hydrobiology, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
- Department of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Thibault Datry
- INRAE, UR RiverLy, centre de Lyon-Villeurbanne, Villeurbanne, France
| | | | - Alain Dohet
- Environmental Research and Innovation (ERIN) Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Belvaux, Luxembourg
| | - Emma Drohan
- Institute of Technology, Centre for Freshwater and Environmental Studies, Dundalk, Ireland
| | | | - Maria J Feio
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Marie A E Forio
- Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Goethals
- Department of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wolfram Graf
- University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jani Heino
- Finnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, Oulu, Finland
| | - Emma J Hudgins
- Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Sonja C Jähnig
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Department Community and Ecosystem Ecology, Berlin, Germany
- Geography Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Richard K Johnson
- Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Aitor Larrañaga
- Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain
| | - Patrick Leitner
- University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lionel L'Hoste
- Environmental Research and Innovation (ERIN) Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), Belvaux, Luxembourg
| | - Marie-Helene Lizee
- RECOVER Research Unit, National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE), Aix-en-Provence, France
| | - Anthony Maire
- EDF R&D, Laboratoire National d'Hydraulique et Environnement (LNHE), Chatou, France
| | - Jes J Rasmussen
- Section for Nature Based Solutions, Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Oslo, Norway
| | - Ralf B Schäfer
- University of Koblenz Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Landau, Germany
| | - Astrid Schmidt-Kloiber
- University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Gábor Várbíró
- Department of Tisza Research, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Centre for Ecological Research, Debrecen, Hungary
| | | | - Peter Haase
- Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Department of River Ecology and Conservation, Gelnhausen, Germany
- University of Duisburg-Essen, Faculty of Biology, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Drouin A, McKindsey CW, Johnson LE. Dynamics of recruitment and establishment of the invasive seaweed Codium fragile within an eelgrass habitat. MARINE BIOLOGY 2016; 163:61. [PMID: 27064481 PMCID: PMC4766232 DOI: 10.1007/s00227-016-2832-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Knowledge of the potential distribution (i.e. abundance and spatial extent) of an invasive species is important to estimating its potential impacts on recipient communities. Most previous studies have focused on the potential spatial extent of invasive species populations at regional scales, but little is known on how species successfully recruit and establish at more local scales. In this study, we examined how recruitment of the green alga Codium fragile ssp. fragile (hereafter Codium) can vary spatially and the environmental factors associated with Codium establishment in eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds. Standardized recruitment blocks (65 blocks in a 720 × 240 m2 grid) were used to monitor the number of Codium recruits, juveniles and adults over 2 years. Environmental factors (depth, relative water flow, light and temperature) and attributes of the surrounding macrophyte assemblage (eelgrass density, eelgrass length, Codium biomass) were also measured. Recruitment occurred on all blocks or nearby artificial structures (i.e. buoys) and mainly originated from button stages (i.e. female gametes or utricles). Contrary to other studies, the abundance of Codium (recruits, juveniles and adults) was best predicted by the density of the native canopy-forming species, Z. marina, which highlights a positive interaction between native and non-native canopy-forming species. Seasonal variation in recruitment was observed; it was lower during the summer. Recruitment did not show any distinct spatial pattern (e.g. gradient or patch), but the same spatial pattern of recruitment was observed every sampling date, suggesting that there are "hotspots" for recruitment. In general, the total number of Codium fronds observed on a block at the end of the experiment was positively correlated with the cumulative number of recruits. However, recruitment occurred on some blocks but recruits never grew, suggesting that some environmental factors limit Codium distribution and abundance in eelgrass beds. Overall, the assessment of Codium recruitment over 2 years showed that the colonization of suitable locations by Codium within seagrass beds may take several years and that some factors may not only limit, but also inhibit Codium expansion within eelgrass beds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annick Drouin
- />Demersal and Benthic Sciences Branch, Maurice-Lamontagne Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, PO Box 1000, Mont Joli, QC G5H 3Z4 Canada
- />Département de biologie et Québec-Océan, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| | - Christopher W. McKindsey
- />Demersal and Benthic Sciences Branch, Maurice-Lamontagne Institute, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, PO Box 1000, Mont Joli, QC G5H 3Z4 Canada
| | - Ladd E. Johnson
- />Département de biologie et Québec-Océan, Université Laval, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6 Canada
| |
Collapse
|