1
|
Vito A, Salem O, El-Sayes N, MacFawn IP, Portillo AL, Milne K, Harrington D, Ashkar AA, Wan Y, Workenhe ST, Nelson BH, Bruno TC, Mossman KL. Immune checkpoint blockade in triple negative breast cancer influenced by B cells through myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Commun Biol 2021; 4:859. [PMID: 34253827 PMCID: PMC8275624 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02375-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer holds a dismal clinical outcome and as such, patients routinely undergo aggressive, highly toxic treatment regimens. Clinical trials for TNBC employing immune checkpoint blockade in combination with chemotherapy show modest prognostic benefit, but the percentage of patients that respond to treatment is low, and patients often succumb to relapsed disease. Here, we show that a combination immunotherapy platform utilizing low dose chemotherapy (FEC) combined with oncolytic virotherapy (oHSV-1) increases tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, in otherwise immune-bare tumors, allowing 60% of mice to achieve durable tumor regression when treated with immune checkpoint blockade. Whole-tumor RNA sequencing of mice treated with FEC + oHSV-1 shows an upregulation of B cell receptor signaling pathways and depletion of B cells prior to the start of treatment in mice results in complete loss of therapeutic efficacy and expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Additionally, RNA sequencing data shows that FEC + oHSV-1 suppresses genes associated with myeloid-derived suppressor cells, a key population of cells that drive immune escape and mediate therapeutic resistance. These findings highlight the importance of tumor-infiltrating B cells as drivers of antitumor immunity and their potential role in the regulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa Vito
- McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Omar Salem
- McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nader El-Sayes
- McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ian P MacFawn
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Tumor Microenvironment Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ana L Portillo
- McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Katy Milne
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | | | - Ali A Ashkar
- McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yonghong Wan
- McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Samuel T Workenhe
- Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Brad H Nelson
- Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, Victoria, BC, Canada
- Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tullia C Bruno
- Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Tumor Microenvironment Center, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Karen L Mossman
- McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li C, Ngorsuraches S, Chou C, Chen L, Qian J. Risk Factors of Fluoropyrimidine Induced Cardiotoxicity among Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 162:103346. [PMID: 33930532 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer patients experienced an increased risk of cardiotoxicity during fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine). We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, IPA, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2019, in English, examining risk factors for cardiotoxicity induced by fluoropyrimidine. Included study-level data were converted to risk ratios (RRs) and pooled RRs were calculated for meta-analyses using a random-effects method. Among 690 publications identified for abstract and title screening, 22 unique studies were included in the review, and 20 had sufficient data for meta-analyses. Results indicated that patients undergoing capecitabine-based combination therapy had a higher risk than those with monotherapy (pooled RR = 1.61). Patients with pre-existing cardiac disease (pooled RR = 3.26), hypertension (pooled RR = 1.52) or smoking (pooled RR = 2.22) also had higher risks than their counterparts. Developing risk assessment tools to mitigate the risk could be a viable strategy to improve outcomes for cancer patients undergoing fluoropyrimidine-based treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Li
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Surachat Ngorsuraches
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Chiahung Chou
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA; Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Li Chen
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jingjing Qian
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Masucci L, Torres S, Eisen A, Trudeau M, Tyono I, Saunders H, Chan KW, Isaranuwatchai W. Cost-utility analysis of 21-gene assay for node-positive early breast cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 26:307-318. [PMID: 31708649 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background For women with lymph node (ln)-positive, estrogen receptor-positive, and her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-negative breast cancer (bca), current guidelines recommend treatment with both hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. The 21-gene Recurrence Score (rs) assay might be helpful in selecting patients with bca who can be spared chemotherapy when they have 1-3 positive lns and a lower risk of recurrence. In the present study, we performed a cost-utility analysis comparing use of the 21-gene rs assay with current practice from the perspective of a Canadian health care payer. Methods A Markov model was developed to determine costs and quality-adjusted life-years (qalys) over a patient's lifetime. Patient outcomes in both study groups were examined based on published clinical trials. Costs were derived primarily from published Canadian sources. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 1.5% annually, and costs are reported in 2016 Canadian dollars. A probabilistic analysis was used, and the model parameters were varied in a sensitivity analysis. Results The results indicate that use of the 21-gene rs assay was less costly ($432 less) and more effective (0.22 qalys) than current practice. The probabilistic analysis revealed that 70% of the 10,000 simulated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were in the southeast quadrant. The results were sensitive to the probability of a low rs and to the probability of receiving chemotherapy in the low-risk rs category and in current practice. Conclusions Use of the 21-gene rs assay could be a cost-effective strategy for Ontario patients with estrogen receptor-positive, her2-negative early bca and 1-3 positive lns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Masucci
- Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - S Torres
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - A Eisen
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.,Cancer Care Ontario, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - M Trudeau
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.,Cancer Care Ontario, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - I Tyono
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - H Saunders
- Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - K W Chan
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.,Cancer Care Ontario, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.,Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| | - W Isaranuwatchai
- Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.,Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tervonen HE, Chen TYT, Lin E, Boyle FM, Moylan EJ, Della-Fiorentina SA, Beith J, Johnston A, Currow DC. Risk of emergency hospitalisation and survival outcomes following adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer in New South Wales, Australia. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13125. [PMID: 31222826 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine risk of emergency hospital admission and survival following adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. METHODS Linked data from New South Wales population-based and clinical cancer registries (2008-2012), hospital admissions, official death records and pharmaceutical benefit claims. Women aged ≥18 years receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer in NSW public hospitals were included. Odds ratios (OR) for emergency hospitalisation within 6 months following chemotherapy initiation were estimated using logistic regression and survival using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS A total of 3,950 women were included and 30.6% were hospitalised. The most common principal diagnosis at admission was neutropenia (30.8%). Women receiving docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab (TCH) and docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) were the most frequently hospitalised. After adjustment for demographic and clinical factors, the increased risk of hospitalisation for TCH and TC remained compared with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide 3-weekly (OR 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.37 and OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.17-1.85 respectively). Five-year overall survival was similar for women who were (92.2%, 95% CI 90.7-93.8) and were not hospitalised (93.1%, 95% CI 92.1-94.1). CONCLUSION Emergency hospitalisations following chemotherapy for early breast cancer were relatively common, especially following docetaxel-containing protocols. Further examination of reasons for admission is needed to inform actions to improve patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tina Y T Chen
- Cancer Institute NSW, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Enmoore Lin
- Cancer Institute NSW, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Frances M Boyle
- University of Sydney and Mater Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Jane Beith
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy Johnston
- Cancer Institute NSW, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David C Currow
- Cancer Institute NSW, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lupichuk S, Tilley D, Kostaras X, Joy AA. Real-world adjuvant TAC or FEC-D for HER2-negative node-positive breast cancer in women less than 50 years of age. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 23:164-70. [PMID: 27330344 DOI: 10.3747/co.23.3004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We compared the efficacy, toxicity, and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (g-csf) with tac (docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide) and fec-d (5-fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) in women less than 50 years of age. METHODS The study included all women more than 18 years but less than 50 years of age with her2-negative, node-positive, stage ii or iii breast cancer diagnosed in Alberta between 2008 and 2012 who received tac (n = 198) or fec-d (n = 274). RESULTS The patient groups were well-balanced, except that radiotherapy use was higher in the tac group (91.9% vs. 79.9%, p < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 49.6 months, disease-free survival was 91.4% for tac and 92.0% for fec-d (p = 0.76). Overall survival (os) was 96% with tac and 95.3% with fec-d (p = 0.86).The incidences of grades 3 and 4 toxicities were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05). Overall, febrile neutropenia (fn) was reported in 11.6% of tac patients and 15.7% of fec-d patients (p = 0.26). However, use of g-csf was higher in the tac group than in the fec-d group (96.4% vs. 71.5%, p < 0.001). Hospitalization for fn was required in 10.5% of tac patients and 13.0% of fec-d patients (p = 0.41). In g-csf-supported and -unsupported patients receiving tac, fn occurred at rates of 11.1% and 33.3% respectively (p = 0.08); in patients receiving the fec portion of fec-d, those proportions were 2.9% and 8.1% respectively (p = 0.24); and in patients receiving docetaxel after fec, the proportions were 4.1% and 17.6% respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In women less than 50 years of age receiving adjuvant tac or fec-d, we observed no differences in efficacy or other nonhematologic toxicities. Based on the timing and rates of fn, use of prophylactic g-csf should be routine for the docetaxel-containing portion of treatment; however, prophylactic g-csf could potentially be avoided during the fec portion of fec-d treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lupichuk
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
| | - D Tilley
- CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB
| | - X Kostaras
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB;; CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB
| | - A A Joy
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB
| |
Collapse
|