1
|
Mashayekh-Amiri S, Jafarabadi MA, Hosseinzadeh M, Kanani ES, Mirghafourvand M. Measurement properties of the Iranian version of the breast cancer perception scale (BCPS) according to the COSMIN checklist. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:743. [PMID: 38890612 PMCID: PMC11186127 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12493-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is a prevalent cancer characterized by its aggressive nature and potential to cause mortality among women. The rising mortality rates and women's inadequate perception of the disease's severity in developing countries highlight the importance of screening using conventional methods and reliable scales. Since the validity and reliability of the breast cancer perception scale (BCPS) have not been established in the Iranian context. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the measurement properties of the BCPS in women residing in Tabriz, Iran. METHODS The present study comprised a cross-sectional design, encompassing a sample of 372 Iranian women. The participants were selected through a multi-stage cluster random sampling technique conducted over a period spanning from November 2022 to February 2023. The measurement properties of the Iranian version of BCPS were assessed following the guidelines outlined in the COSMIN checklist. This involved conducting various steps, including the translation process, reliability testing (internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement error), and methodological tests for validity (content validity, face validity, construct validity, and hypothesis testing). The study also investigated the factors of responsiveness and interpretability. The presence of floor and ceiling effects was assessed. RESULTS The internal consistency of the scale was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, yielding a satisfactory value of 0.68. Additionally, McDonald's omega (95% CI) was computed, resulting in a value of 0.70 (0.66 to 0.74). Furthermore, the test-retest reliability was evaluated, revealing a high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94 to 0.99). The CVI, CVR, and impact scores of the BCPS were determined to be 0.98, 0.95, and 3.70, respectively, indicating favorable levels of content and face validity. To assess construct validity, an examination of the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was conducted on a set of 24 items. This analysis revealed the presence of six distinct factors, which collectively accounted for 52% of the cumulative variance. The fit indices of the validity model (CFI = 0.91, NFI = 0.96, RFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.90, χ2/df = 2.03, RMSEA = 0.055 and SRMR = 0.055) were confirmed during the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The overall score of BCPS exhibited a ceiling effect of 0.3%. The floor effect observed in the overall score (BCPS) was found to be 0.5%. Concerning the validation of the hypothesis, Spearman's correlation coefficient of 0.55 was obtained between the BCPS and the QLICP-BR V2.0. This correlation value signifies a statistically significant association. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the minimum important change (MIC) of 3.92 exhibited a higher value compared to the smallest detectable change (SDC) of 3.70, thus suggesting a satisfactory level of response. CONCLUSIONS The obtained findings suggest that the Iranian version of the BCPS demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties for assessing the perception of breast cancer among Iranian women. Furthermore, it exhibits favorable responsiveness to clinical variations. Consequently, it can serve as a screening instrument for healthcare professionals to comprehend breast cancer and as a reliable tool in research endeavors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepideh Mashayekh-Amiri
- Students Research Committee, Midwifery Department, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi
- Cabrini Research, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, VIC, 3144, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, VIC 3800, Melbourne, Australia
- Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mina Hosseinzadeh
- Department of Community Health Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Elham Seyed Kanani
- Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mojgan Mirghafourvand
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
- Medical Philosophy and History Reseach Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coogan AC, Lunt LG, Keshwani SS, Sandhu O, Zhang Y, O'Donoghue C, Madrigrano A. Screening Practices for Breast and Nonbreast Cancers in High-Risk Mutation Carriers. J Surg Res 2023; 291:388-395. [PMID: 37516046 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women with breast cancer often undergo genetic testing and may have a pathogenic variant associated with multiple cancers. This study examines the current screening practices for breast and nonbreast cancers in mutation carriers. METHODS An institutional retrospective chart review of patients with BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CHEK2, BARD1, BRIP1, PALB2, and TP53 mutations were identified. Adherence to recommended screening based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines was analyzed. RESULTS Six hundred sixty-two patients met inclusion criteria: 220 patients with BRCA1, 256 patients with BRCA2, 58 patients with PALB2, 51 patients with ATM, 48 patients with CHEK2, 14 patients with BRIP1, 10 patients with BARD1, and 5 patients with TP53. Overall, 214 (46%) of eligible patients completed recommended breast imaging. Of 106 patients eligible for pancreatic cancer screening, 20 (19%) received a magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and 16 (15%) received an endoscopic ultrasound. On multivariable analysis, age was associated with improved breast imaging adherence: patients in age groups 40-55 (adjusted odds ratio 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.18-3.55) and age 56-70 (adjusted odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.18-3.95, P = 0.012) had better adherence than younger patients. CONCLUSIONS Increases in genetic testing and updates to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines provide an opportunity for improved cancer screening. While recommended breast cancer screenings are being completed at higher rates, there is a need for clear protocols in this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison C Coogan
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Lilia G Lunt
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sarah S Keshwani
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Yanyu Zhang
- Rush Research Informatics Core, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Andrea Madrigrano
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roebothan A, Smith KN, Seal M, Etchegary H, Dawson L. Specialty Care and Counselling about Hereditary Cancer Risk Improves Adherence to Cancer Screening and Prevention in Newfoundland and Labrador Patients with BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9367-9381. [PMID: 37887578 PMCID: PMC10605144 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30100678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 increase the lifetime risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Guidelines recommend breast screening (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and mammogram) or risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). We sought to (1) characterize the population of BRCA1/2 PV carriers in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), (2) evaluate risk-reducing interventions, and (3) identify factors influencing screening and prevention adherence. We conducted a retrospective study from a population-based provincial cohort of BRCA1/2 PV carriers. The eligibility criteria for risk-reducing interventions were defined for each case and patients were categorized based on their level of adherence with recommendations. Chi-squared and regression analyses were used to determine which factors influenced uptake and level of adherence. A total of 276 BRCA1/2 PV carriers were identified; 156 living NL biological females composed the study population. Unaffected females were younger at testing than those with a cancer diagnosis (44.4 years versus 51.7 years; p = 0.002). Categorized by eligibility, 61.0%, 61.6%, 39.0%, and 75.7% of patients underwent MRI, mammogram, RRM, and RRSO, respectively. Individuals with breast cancer were more likely to have RRM (64.7% versus 35.3%; p < 0.001), and those who attended a specialty hereditary cancer clinic were more likely to be adherent to recommendations (73.2% versus 13.4%; p < 0.001) and to undergo RRSO (84.1% versus 15.9%; p < 0.001). Nearly 40% of the female BRCA1/2 PV carriers were not receiving breast surveillance according to evidence-based recommendations. Cancer risk reduction and uptake of breast imaging and prophylactic surgeries are significantly higher in patients who receive dedicated specialty care. Organized hereditary cancer prevention programs will be a valuable component of Canadian healthcare systems and have the potential to reduce the burden of disease countrywide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee Roebothan
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL 1AB 3V6, Canada;
| | - Kerri N. Smith
- Centre for Translational Genomics, NL Health Services, St. John’s, NL 1AB 3V6, Canada
- Discipline of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL 1AB 3V6, Canada
| | - Melanie Seal
- Discipline of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL 1AB 3V6, Canada;
| | - Holly Etchegary
- Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL 1AB 3V6, Canada;
| | - Lesa Dawson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL 1AB 3V6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Knerr S, Guo B, Wernli KJ, Mittendorf KF, Feigelson HS, Gilmore MJ, Jarvik GP, Kauffman TL, Keast E, Liles EG, Lynch FL, Muessig KR, Okuyama S, Veenstra DL, Zepp JM, Wilfond BS, Devine B, Goddard KAB. Longitudinal adherence to breast cancer surveillance following cancer genetic testing in an integrated health care system. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 201:461-470. [PMID: 37470892 PMCID: PMC10503958 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07007-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Screening with mammography and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important risk management strategy for individuals with inherited pathogenic variants (PVs) in genes associated with increased breast cancer risk. We describe longitudinal screening adherence in individuals who underwent cancer genetic testing as part of usual care in a vertically integrated health system. METHODS We determined the proportion time covered (PTC) by annual mammography and breast MRI for individuals with PVs in TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, NF1, CHEK2, and ATM. We determined time covered by biennial mammography beginning at age 50 years for individuals who received negative results, uncertain results, or with PVs in genes without specific breast cancer screening recommendations. RESULTS One hundred and forty individuals had PVs in TP53, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, NF1, CHEK2, or ATM. Among these individuals, average PTC was 48% (range 0-99%) for annual screening mammography and 34% (range 0-100%) for annual breast MRI. Average PTC was highest for individuals with PVs in CHEK2 (N = 14) and lowest for individuals with PVs in TP53 (N = 3). Average PTC for biennial mammography (N = 1,027) was 49% (0-100%). CONCLUSION Longitudinal screening adherence in individuals with PVs in breast cancer associated genes, as measured by the proportion of time covered, is low; adherence to annual breast MRI falls below that of annual mammography. Additional research should examine screening behavior in individuals with PVs in breast cancer associated genes with a goal of developing interventions to improve adherence to recommended risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Knerr
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 351621, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Boya Guo
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karen J Wernli
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathleen F Mittendorf
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Marian J Gilmore
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tia L Kauffman
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Erin Keast
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Frances L Lynch
- Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kristin R Muessig
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sonia Okuyama
- Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA
| | - David L Veenstra
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jamilyn M Zepp
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Beth Devine
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Box 351621, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Department of Translational and Applied Genomics (TAG), Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wehbe A, Gonte MR, O'Neill SC, Amit‐Yousif A, Purrington K, Manning M, Simon MS. Predictors of nonadherence to breast cancer screening guidelines in a United States urban comprehensive cancer center. Cancer Med 2023; 12:15482-15491. [PMID: 37329206 PMCID: PMC10417068 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify predictors of nonadherence to breast cancer screening guidelines in an urban screening clinic among high- and average-risk women in the United States. METHODS We reviewed records of 6090 women who received ≥2 screening mammograms over 2 years at the Karmanos Cancer Institute to examine how breast cancer risk and breast density were associated with guideline-concordant screening. Incongruent screening was defined as receiving supplemental imaging between screening mammograms for average-risk women, and as not receiving recommended supplemental imaging for high-risk women. We used t-tests and chi-square tests to examine bivariate associations with guideline-congruent screening, and probit regression to regress guideline-congruence unto breast cancer risk, breast density, and their interaction, controlling for age and race. RESULTS Incongruent screening was more likely among high- versus average-risk women (97.7% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.01). Among average-risk women, incongruent screening was more likely among those with dense versus nondense breasts (2.0% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.01). Among high-risk women, incongruent screening was more likely among those with nondense versus dense breasts (99.5% vs. 95.2%, p < 0.01). The significant main effects of density and high-risk on increased incongruent screening were qualified by a density by high-risk interaction, showing a weaker association between risk and incongruent screening among women with dense breasts (simple slope = 3.71, p < 0.01) versus nondense breasts (simple slope = 5.79, p < 0.01). Age and race were not associated with incongruent screening. CONCLUSIONS Lack of adherence to evidence-based screening guidelines has led to underutilization of supplementary imaging for high-risk women and potential overutilization for women with dense breasts without other risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Wehbe
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Department of OncologyBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
- Population Studies and Disparities Research ProgramBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
- Wayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Madeleine R. Gonte
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Wayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Suzanne C. O'Neill
- Department of Oncology, Lombardi Cancer CenterGeorgetown UniversityWashingtonDCUSA
| | - Alit Amit‐Yousif
- Center for Breast HealthOakland Macomb Obstetrics and GynecologyRochester HillsMichiganUSA
| | - Kristen Purrington
- Population Studies and Disparities Research ProgramBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Mark Manning
- Department of PsychologyOakland UniversityRochesterMichiganUSA
- Center for Molecular Medicine and GeneticsWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Michael S. Simon
- Department of OncologyBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
- Population Studies and Disparities Research ProgramBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yan K, Gao Y, Heller SL. Breast Cancer Screening Utilization and Outcomes in Women With Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:e200-e205. [PMID: 36863889 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have up to a 5-fold increased risk for breast cancer before age 50 and a 3.5-fold increased risk of breast cancer overall. The purpose of our study was to assess breast cancer screening utilization and outcomes in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS This IRB approved HIPAA compliant study retrospectively assessed consecutive NF1 patients (January 2012-December 2021) with recorded clinical visits and/or breast imaging. Patient demographics, risk factors, and screening mammogram and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics were obtained and standard breast screening measures were calculated. RESULTS One hundred and eleven women (median age 43, range 30-82) were eligible for screening based on current NCCN guidelines. A total of 86% (95/111) of all patients and 80% (24/30) of patients under age 40 had at least 1 mammogram. In contrast, 28% (31/111) of all patients and 33% (25/76) of patients ages 30 to 50 had at least 1 screening MRI. Of 368 screening mammograms performed, 38 of 368 (10%) resulted in the recall, and 22 of 368 (6%) resulted in a biopsy. Of 48 screening MRIs performed, 19 of 48 (40%) short-term follow-ups and 12 of 48 (25%) biopsies were recommended. All 6 screen-detected cancers in our cohort were detected initially on screening mammograms. CONCLUSION Results confirm the utility and performance of screening mammography in the NF1 population. The low utilization of MRI in our cohort limits the evaluation of outcomes via this modality and suggests there may be an education or interest gap among referrers and patients regarding supplemental screening recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Yan
- Department of Radiology, New York University, New York, NY.
| | - Yiming Gao
- Department of Radiology, New York University, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Satoh M, Sato N. Relationship of attitudes toward uncertainty and preventive health behaviors with breast cancer screening participation. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2021; 21:171. [PMID: 33882923 PMCID: PMC8061057 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01317-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Backgroundcxs Early detection of breast cancer is effective for prolonging survival, but the participation rate in breast cancer screening among target Japanese women remains low. This study examined the relationships between tendencies in decision-making under conditions of uncertainty, health behaviors, demographics, and breast cancer screening participation in Japanese women. Methods Secondary analysis was performed using data from the 2017 Keio Household Panel Survey (KHPS). The study population consisted of 2945 households. Data were obtained from the KHPS for women aged 40 years or older. Breast cancer screening participation in the past year, risk aversion, time preference, health behaviors (e.g., smoking, alcohol consumption, and medical treatment received in the past year), and demographic variables were analyzed. Results Data from 708 women were analyzed. Among the respondents, 28.8% had attended breast cancer screening in the past year. Factors found to significantly contribute to breast cancer screening participation included higher risk aversion (odds ratio [OR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03–5.32; p = 0.043), medical treatment received in the past year (OR, 1.56; 95% CI = 1.06–2.30; p = 0.026), higher self-rated health (OR, 1.47; 95% CI = 1.18–1.83; p = 0.001), living above the poverty line (OR, 2.31; 95% CI = 1.13–4.72; p = 0.022), and having children (OR, 1.57; 95% CI = 1.02–2.42; p = 0.042). Factors significantly associated with non-participation in breast cancer screening were smoking (OR, 0.20; 95% CI = 0.10–0.42; p < 0.000), alcohol consumption (OR, 0.56; 95% CI = 0.37–0.86; p = 0.007), being self-employed (OR, 0.22; 95% CI = 0.10–0.46; p < 0.000), and being unemployed (OR, 0.48; 95% CI = 0.26–0.90; p = 0.022). No significant relationship was observed between time preference and screening participation. Conclusions The results indicate that women who recognize the actual risk of developing breast cancer or have high awareness of breast cancer prevention tend to participate in breast cancer screening. Barriers to screening participation are not working for an organization that encourages screening and low income.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miho Satoh
- Department of Fundamental Nursing, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
| | - Naoko Sato
- Department of Clinical Nursing, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rippinger N, Fischer C, Haun MW, Rhiem K, Grill S, Kiechle M, Cremer FW, Kast K, Nguyen HP, Ditsch N, Kratz CP, Vogel J, Speiser D, Hettmer S, Glimm H, Fröhling S, Jäger D, Seitz S, Hahne A, Maatouk I, Sutter C, Schmutzler RK, Dikow N, Schott S. Cancer surveillance and distress among adult pathogenic TP53 germline variant carriers in Germany: A multicenter feasibility and acceptance survey. Cancer 2020; 126:4032-4041. [PMID: 32557628 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a high-risk cancer predisposition syndrome caused by pathogenic germline variants of TP53. Cancer surveillance has noted a significant survival advantage in individuals with LFS; however, little is known about the feasibility, acceptance, and psychosocial effects of such a program. METHODS Pathogenic TP53 germline variant carriers completed a 7-part questionnaire evaluating sociodemographics, cancer history, surveillance participation, reasons for nonadherence, worries, and distress adapted from the Cancer Worry Scale. Counselees' common concerns and suggestions were assessed in MAXQDA Analytics Pro 12. RESULTS Forty-nine participants (46 females and 3 males), aged 40.0 ± 12.6 years, formed the study population; 43 (88%) had a personal cancer history (including multiple cancers in 10 [20%]). Forty-three individuals participated (88%) in surveillance during the study or formerly. Willingness to undergo surveillance was influenced by satisfaction with genetic testing and counseling (P = .019 [Fisher-Yates test]) but not by sociodemographics, cancer history, or distress level. Almost one-third of the participants reported logistical difficulties in implementing surveillance because of the high frequency of medical visits, scheduling difficulties, and the travel distance to their surveillance providers. Self-reported distress and perceived emotional burden for family members and partners were moderate (median for self-reported distress, 3.3; median for perceived emotional burden, 3.0). For both, the interquartile range was moderate to very high (2.7-3.7 and 3.0-3.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Individuals with LFS require efficient counseling as well as an accessible, well-organized, interdisciplinary, standardized surveillance program to increase adherence and psychological coping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Rippinger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christine Fischer
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Haun
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Grill
- Department of Gynecology and Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Kiechle
- Department of Gynecology and Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Dresden, Germany
| | - Huu P Nguyen
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department of Human Genetics, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig Maximilian University, University Hospital of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christian P Kratz
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Julia Vogel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dorothee Speiser
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simone Hettmer
- Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hanno Glimm
- German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Dresden, Germany.,Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Fröhling
- Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk Jäger
- German Cancer Consortium and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Seitz
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Hahne
- BRCA Network-Support for People with Hereditary Cancers
| | - Imad Maatouk
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nicola Dikow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Petelin L, Hossack L, Mitchell G, Liew D, Trainer AH, James PA. A Microsimulation Model for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Risk Management for BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers: miBRovaCAre. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:854-862. [PMID: 31426925 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2018] [Revised: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop a validated model for evaluating the real-world effectiveness of long-term clinical management strategies for women with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants. METHODS A microsimulation model was developed that included a BRCA-specific natural history for breast and ovarian cancer, a clinical framework for carrier follow-up, and cancer risk management strategies (breast screening, risk-reducing mastectomy, and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). Adherence rates and outcomes for breast screening and risk-reducing surgery were obtained from BRCA carriers seen through a familial cancer service in Melbourne, Australia. The model was assessed for internal and external validity. The model was used to compare women perfectly adhering to screening recommendations versus actual adherence of the clinical cohort. RESULTS The model accurately predicted cancer incidence, pathology, and mortality. Using actual adherence for breast screening resulted in additional breast cancer deaths (per 1000 women: BRCA1, 2.7; BRCA2, 1.6) compared with perfect screening adherence. This decreased average life expectancy by 0.30 life-years for BRCA1 and 0.07 life-years for BRCA2. When carriers had access to risk-reducing mastectomy, the benefit from improved screening adherence was not significant. CONCLUSIONS The developed model is a good descriptor of BRCA carriers' lifetime trajectory and its modification by use of risk management strategies alone or in combination. Evaluations of breast screening in BRCA carriers may overestimate the benefits of screening programs unless adherence is considered. By incorporating real-world clinical practice and patient behavior, this model can assist in developing clinical services and improving clinical outcomes for carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Petelin
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Lucinda Hossack
- Clinical Genetics, Austin Health, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison H Trainer
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul A James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Arnold M, Pfeifer K, Quante AS. Is risk-stratified breast cancer screening economically efficient in Germany? PLoS One 2019; 14:e0217213. [PMID: 31120970 PMCID: PMC6532918 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Risk stratification has so far been evaluated under the assumption that women fully adhere to screening recommendations. However, the participation in German cancer screening programs remains low at 54%. The question arises whether risk-stratified screening is economically efficient under the assumption that adherence is not perfect. METHOD We have adapted a micro-simulation Markov model to the German context. Annual, biennial, and triennial routine screening are compared with five risk-adapted strategies using thresholds of relative risk to stratify screening frequencies. We used three outcome variables (mortality reduction, quality-adjusted life years, and false-positive results) under the assumption of full adherence vs. an adherence rate of 54%. Strategies are evaluated using efficiency frontiers and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). RESULTS The reduced adherence rate affects both performance and cost; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios remain constant. The results of PSA show that risk-stratified screening strategies are more efficient than biennial routine screening under certain conditions. At any willingness-to-pay (WTP), there is a risk-stratified alternative with a higher likelihood of being the best choice. However, without explicit decision criteria and WTP, risk-stratified screening is not more efficient than biennial routine screening. Potential improvements in the adherence rates have significant health gains and budgetary implications. CONCLUSION If the participation rate for mammographic screening is as low as in Germany, stratified screening is not clearly more efficient than routine screening but dependent on the WTP. A more promising design for future stratified strategies is the combination of risk stratification mechanisms with interventions to improve the low adherence in selected high-risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Arnold
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, United Kingdom
- Munich Center of Health Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management, Helmholtz Zentrum München – German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Pfeifer
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Anne S. Quante
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
NF1 Patients Receiving Breast Cancer Screening: Insights from The Ontario High Risk Breast Screening Program. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11050707. [PMID: 31121919 PMCID: PMC6562659 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11050707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis Type I (NF1) is caused by variants in neurofibromin (NF1). NF1 predisposes to a variety of benign and malignant tumor types, including breast cancer. Women with NF1 <50 years of age possess an up to five-fold increased risk of developing breast cancer compared with the general population. Impaired emotional functioning is reported as a comorbidity that may influence the participation of NF1 patients in regular clinical surveillance despite their increased risk of breast and other cancers. Despite emphasis on breast cancer surveillance in women with NF1, the uptake and feasibility of high-risk screening programs in this population remains unclear. A retrospective chart review between 2014–2018 of female NF1 patients seen at the Elizabeth Raab Neurofibromatosis Clinic (ERNC) in Ontario was conducted to examine the uptake of high-risk breast cancer screening, radiologic findings, and breast cancer characteristics. 61 women with pathogenic variants in NF1 enrolled in the high-risk Ontario breast screening program (HR-OBSP); 95% completed at least one high-risk breast screening modality, and four were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. Our findings support the integration of a formal breast screening programs in clinical management of NF1 patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Lagarde JBB, Laurino MY, San Juan MD, Cauyan JML, Tumulak MAJR, Ventura ER. Risk perception and screening behavior of Filipino women at risk for breast cancer: implications for cancer genetic counseling. J Community Genet 2019; 10:281-289. [PMID: 30259342 PMCID: PMC6435779 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-018-0391-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The burden and experiences that come with a breast cancer diagnosis in a family impact how women perceive personal cancer risk and pursue preventive strategies and/or early detection screening. Hence, this study sought to understand how Filipino women incorporate their experiences living with a sister diagnosed with early-onset breast cancer to their personal perceived risk and screening behavior. Guided by phenomenological approach of inquiry, a face-to-face, semi-structured interview was conducted with 12 purposively sampled women with a female sibling diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results revealed that the respondents tend to compare themselves with their sister when constructing views of personal cancer vulnerability. The subjective risk is also shaped by their beliefs regarding cancer causation such as personalistic causes, personal theory of inheritance, and locus of control. Their sisters' cancer diagnoses serve as a motivation for them to perform breast self-examination. However, clinical breast examination and screening mammography are underutilized due to perceived barriers such as difficulty allotting time to medical consultation, fear, and lack of finances. Overall, cancer risk perception and screening behavior are important factors that must be addressed during cancer genetic counseling consultations. Better understanding of these factors will aid in the formulation of an effective management plan for at-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Benedict B Lagarde
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
| | - Mercy Y Laurino
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
- Cancer Prevention Programs, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael D San Juan
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Jaclyn Marie L Cauyan
- College of Education, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Ma-Am Joy R Tumulak
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
- Institute of Human Genetics, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Elizabeth R Ventura
- College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Guindalini RSC, Zheng Y, Abe H, Whitaker K, Yoshimatsu TF, Walsh T, Schacht D, Kulkarni K, Sheth D, Verp MS, Bradbury AR, Churpek J, Obeid E, Mueller J, Khramtsova G, Liu F, Raoul A, Cao H, Romero IL, Hong S, Livingston R, Jaskowiak N, Wang X, Debiasi M, Pritchard CC, King MC, Karczmar G, Newstead GM, Huo D, Olopade OI. Intensive Surveillance with Biannual Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Downstages Breast Cancer in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:1786-1794. [PMID: 30154229 PMCID: PMC6395536 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Revised: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To establish a cohort of high-risk women undergoing intensive surveillance for breast cancer.Experimental Design: We performed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI every 6 months in conjunction with annual mammography (MG). Eligible participants had a cumulative lifetime breast cancer risk ≥20% and/or tested positive for a pathogenic mutation in a known breast cancer susceptibility gene. RESULTS Between 2004 and 2016, we prospectively enrolled 295 women, including 157 mutation carriers (75 BRCA1, 61 BRCA2); participants' mean age at entry was 43.3 years. Seventeen cancers were later diagnosed: 4 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 13 early-stage invasive breast cancers. Fifteen cancers occurred in mutation carriers (11 BRCA1, 3 BRCA2, 1 CDH1). Median size of the invasive cancers was 0.61 cm. No patients had lymph node metastasis at time of diagnosis, and no interval invasive cancers occurred. The sensitivity of biannual MRI alone was 88.2% and annual MG plus biannual MRI was 94.1%. The cancer detection rate of biannual MRI alone was 0.7% per 100 screening episodes, which is similar to the cancer detection rate of 0.7% per 100 screening episodes for annual MG plus biannual MRI. The number of recalls and biopsies needed to detect one cancer by biannual MRI were 2.8 and 1.7 in BRCA1 carriers, 12.0 and 8.0 in BRCA2 carriers, and 11.7 and 5.0 in non-BRCA1/2 carriers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Biannual MRI performed well for early detection of invasive breast cancer in genomically stratified high-risk women. No benefit was associated with annual MG screening plus biannual MRI screening.See related commentary by Kuhl and Schrading, p. 1693.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- CLION, CAM Group, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
- Department of Radiology and Oncology, The State of Sao Paulo Cancer Institute, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Yonglan Zheng
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Hiroyuki Abe
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kristen Whitaker
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Toshio F Yoshimatsu
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tom Walsh
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - David Schacht
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kirti Kulkarni
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Deepa Sheth
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Marion S Verp
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Angela R Bradbury
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, and Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jane Churpek
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Elias Obeid
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffrey Mueller
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Galina Khramtsova
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Fang Liu
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Akila Raoul
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Hongyuan Cao
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Iris L Romero
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Susan Hong
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- University of Illinois Cancer Center, University of Illinois - Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert Livingston
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nora Jaskowiak
- Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Xiaoming Wang
- Computation Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Marcio Debiasi
- PUCRS School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mary-Claire King
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Gregory Karczmar
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| | | | - Dezheng Huo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Olufunmilayo I Olopade
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rippinger N, Heinzler J, Bruckner T, Brucker J, Dinkic C, Hoffmann J, Dornhöfer N, Seitz S, Rom J, Sohn C, Schott TC, Schott S. The impact of a cervical dysplasia diagnosis on individual cancer prevention habits over time: a bicentric case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 299:847-855. [PMID: 30607592 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-5029-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Annual cervical cancer screening is recommended in Germany as a part of the statutory preventive care. Abnormal results can provoke psychological distress and anxiety, compromising women's adherence. Little is known about how a cervical dysplasia impacts adherence follow-up visits and prevention habits over time. To optimize care strategies, this study aims to identify women at risk for nonadherence to follow-up visits after a screening event. METHODS Between November 2015 and May 2017, participants with an abnormal Pap smear at the Heidelberg and Leipzig University Hospitals received a four-part questionnaire (sociodemographic data, PHQ-D, self-designed fear and prevention habit questions) at the first consultation (T1) and subsequently after 3 (T2) and 6 (T3) months; healthy controls completed the questionnaire at T1. RESULTS 132 women with an abnormal Pap smear [with conization: S1 (n = 68, 51.5%), without intervention: S2 (n = 64, 48.5%)] and healthy controls (K, n = 101) generally adhered to gynecological checkups, except S1 6 months after the first diagnosis (S1/T3 - 0.47, signed rank p < 0.0005). Knowledge of primary prevention information, i.e., HPV vaccination, was significantly higher among K (K 58%, S1 29%, S2 44%, Chi-squared p = 0.01) as was vaccine uptake (K 39% versus S1/S2 7% and 17%, respectively, Chi-squared p = 0.0004). Fear of upcoming Pap smears rose significantly over time (S1/T1-S1/T2-S1/T3, Wilcoxon signed-rank test p < 0.001) and was higher among those with conization at T2 (Chi-square test, p = 0.01) and partially accompanied by panic disorders at T1 (Chi-square test p = 0.035). Realization of general preventive habits rose significantly among women without an operative procedure (S2) over the study. CONCLUSION This study advances the understanding of non-participation in follow-up visits after a dysplasia diagnosis, identifying post-conization women as a special risk group for decreased adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Rippinger
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Heinzler
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Bruckner
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Brucker
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Dinkic
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Hoffmann
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - N Dornhöfer
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - S Seitz
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - J Rom
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Sohn
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T C Schott
- Department of Orthodontics and Orofacial Orthopedics, University Hospital Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany
| | - Sarah Schott
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hall ET, Parikh D, Caswell-Jin JL, Gupta T, Mills MA, Kingham KE, Koff R, Ford JM, Kurian AW. Pathogenic Variants in Less Familiar Cancer Susceptibility Genes: What Happens After Genetic Testing? JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2:1-10. [DOI: 10.1200/po.18.00167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose As genetic testing expands, patients are increasingly found to carry pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes that are less familiar to most clinicians, specifically genes other than those causing hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome ( BRCA1 and BRCA2) and Lynch syndrome. Little is known about the subsequent behaviors of such patients in terms of managing cancer risks and informing relatives. Methods All adult patients who were counseled and tested at the Stanford Cancer Genetics Clinic from January 2013 to July 2015 and had a pathogenic variant in a non- BRCA1/2, non–Lynch syndrome gene were invited to participate in a telephone interview about adherence to risk-reducing recommendations, genetic testing by relatives, and new cancer incidence. Results Fifty-seven (40%) of 142 eligible patients were successfully contacted, and all 57 patients participated; median follow-up was 677 days (range, 247 to 1,401 days). Most patients (82%; 95% CI, 70% to 90%) recalled that a risk-reducing intervention (screening, medication, or surgery) was recommended, and most patients (85%; 95% CI, 72% to 93%) adhered to the recommendation. Nearly all patients (91%; 95% CI, 81% to 97%) shared results with relatives, and most patients (78%; 95% CI, 64% to 88%) reported that a relative was subsequently tested. During the follow-up period, 9% of patients (95% CI, 3% to 19%) developed second cancers, and in 14% of patients (95% CI, 7% to 26%), a first-degree relative developed cancer, some of which were detected by recommended screening. Conclusion Patients with a pathogenic variant in a less familiar cancer susceptibility gene report high adherence to risk-reducing interventions. Furthermore, in the 57 carriers and subsequently tested relatives with two years of follow-up, a total of three cancers (one in a proband and two in relatives) were detected through interventions recommended on the basis of the pathogenic variant. These results suggest a potential benefit of genetic counseling and testing for pathogenic variants in less familiar genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tanya Gupta
- All authors: Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | - Rachel Koff
- All authors: Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cortesi L, Canossi B, Battista R, Pecchi A, Drago A, Dal Molin C, Toss A, De Matteis E, Marchi I, Torricelli P, Cascinu S. Breast ultrasonography (BU) in the screening protocol for women at hereditary-familial risk of breast cancer: has the time come to rethink the role of BU according to different risk categories? Int J Cancer 2018; 144:1001-1009. [PMID: 30098212 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2018] [Revised: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
This article evaluates the breast cancer (BC) screening efficacy of biannual ultrasound (US) in three different risk categories. In a single-center, prospective, nonrandomized comparison study, BRCA mutation carriers and women with high risk (HR) or intermediate risk (IR) received mammography (MMG), ultrasound, (US) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), scheduled according to the risk categories. Single and combined sensitivity were evaluated in specific groups of risk and the US performance at six-monthly interval was notably considered. Among 2,313 asymptomatic women at different risk (136 mutation carriers, 1,749 at HR and 428 at IR) 211 developed a BC, of which 193 (91.5%) were screen detected BC (SDBC) and 18 (8.5%) were interval BC (IBC). The SDBC detection rate (DR) was 11.2 per 1.000 person-years (37.9, 8.5 and 16.1 for BRCA, HR and IR, respectively); 116 BC were detected by MMG (DR = 6.6 × 1,000 persons-years), 62 by US (DR = 3.6 × 1,000 persons-years) and 15 by MRI, that was applied only in 60 BRCA women (DR = 37 × 1,000 persons-years). At the six-monthly US, 52 BC were detected (DR = 3.0 × 1,000 persons/years), of which 8 were BRCA-related. The most sensitive technique was MRI (93.7%) followed by MMG (55%) and US (29.4%). Combined sensitivity for MMG plus US was 100% in HR and 80.4% for IR women (p < 0.01). In BRCA mutated patients, MRI alone with annual US performed after six months, could be offered. In HR patients, MMG plus biannual US provide the most sensitive diagnosis and for IR group an annual MMG could be sufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cortesi
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Barbara Canossi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Rachele Battista
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Annarita Pecchi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Antonella Drago
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Chiara Dal Molin
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Angela Toss
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Elisabetta De Matteis
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Isabella Marchi
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Pietro Torricelli
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Cascinu
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ma C, Yan J, Wu Y, Huang W. Illness perceptions of Chinese women with breast cancer and relationships with socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Int J Nurs Pract 2018; 24:e12677. [DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Revised: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhua Ma
- School of Medical Technology and Nursing; Shenzhen Polytechnic College; Shenzhen China
| | - Jun Yan
- School of Nursing; Sun Yat-Sen University; Guangzhou China
| | - Yan Wu
- School of Nursing; Sun Yat-Sen University; Guangzhou China
| | - Wanbing Huang
- School of Nursing; Sun Yat-Sen University; Guangzhou China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Familial breast cancer: Genetic counseling over time, including patients´ expectations and initiators considering the Angelina Jolie effect. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0177893. [PMID: 28542378 PMCID: PMC5444628 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The German Consortium for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (GC-HBOC) aims for nationwide access to professional, individualized yet structured care for families at high risk. The identification of such families remains key for optimal care. Our study evaluates counselees’ characteristics, referral practices, expectations and motivations in respect to their first genetic consultation. The impact of the Angelina Jolie Effect (AJE) was prospectively assessed. Methods All counselees could participate through a questionnaire. Groups were built in respect to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FT) and before/after AJE. Results The 917 (88.5%) counselees (FT: 8.2%) were on average female (97.3%), with a mean age of 44.6, had children (71.9%), higher education (88%), personal (46.4%) or at least one first-degree relative (74.6%) with BC/OC or known BRCA1/2 mutation (11.8%), were in a relationship (76.1%), and living in a village (40.7%). The AJE is associated with significantly fewer cancelations (p = 0.005), more attendance among men (4.2% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.002), and people with familial BRCA1/2 (14.8% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.003). The majority seek information regarding their cancer risk (83%) or relatives’ risk (74.8%), HBOC (69.1%), and surveillance programs for themselves (66.6%) or relatives (60.6%). Conclusion Enhanced media awareness of genetic cancer motivates patients, including other patient groups. A higher number of participants, including more men, are attending GC due to the AJE. In terms of the rising complexity of genetic testing, the analysis of patients’ expectations and initiators for GC suggests that there is an urgent need to develop to participate motivation analysis. The factors revealed as impediments to accessing GC-HBOC guide recommendations to optimize access to genetic counseling. Medical educational programs for primary gynecologists and families at risk might be options to reach more participants.
Collapse
|
19
|
Schott S, Vetter L, Keller M, Bruckner T, Golatta M, Eismann S, Dikow N, Evers C, Sohn C, Heil J. Women at familial risk of breast cancer electing for prophylactic mastectomy: frequencies, procedures, and decision-making characteristics. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017; 295:1451-1458. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4376-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
20
|
Eismann S, Vetter L, Keller M, Bruckner T, Golatta M, Hennings A, Domschke C, Dikow N, Sohn C, Heil J, Schott S. Long-term experiences with genetic consultation in people with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016; 294:1011-1018. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4133-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 06/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|