1
|
Morganti S, Gibson CJ, Jin Q, Santos K, Patel A, Wilson A, Merrill M, Vincuilla J, Stokes S, Lipsyc-Sharf M, Parker T, King TA, Mittendorf EA, Curigliano G, Hughes ME, Stover DG, Tolaney SM, Weeks LD, Tayob N, Lin NU, Garber JE, Miller PG, Parsons HA. Prevalence, Dynamics, and Prognostic Role of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential in Patients With Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301071. [PMID: 38190580 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is frequent in patients with solid tumors. Prospective data about CHIP prevalence at breast cancer diagnosis and its dynamic evolution under treatment selective pressure are limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed targeted error-corrected sequencing on 614 samples from 380 patients with breast cancer. We investigated the dynamics of CHIP on prospectively collected paired samples from patients with early breast cancer (eBC) receiving chemotherapy (CT) or endocrine therapy (ET). We assessed the correlation of CHIP with survival in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We estimated the risk of progression to treatment-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) according to the clonal hematopoiesis risk score (CHRS). In exploratory analyses, we considered clonal hematopoiesis (CH) with variant allele fraction (VAF) ≥0.005. RESULTS CHIP was identified in 15% of patients before treatment. Few CHIP emerged after treatment, and the risk of developing new mutations was similar for patients receiving CT versus ET (odds ratio [OR], 1.16; P = .820). However, CT increased the risk of developing new CH with VAF ≥0.005 (OR, 3.45; P = .002). Five TP53-mutant CH with VAF ≥0.005 emerged among patients receiving CT. Most patients had low risk of t-MN according to the CHRS score. CHIP did not correlate with survival in mTNBC. CONCLUSION CHIP is frequent in patients with breast cancer. In this study, CT did not lead to emergence of new CHIP, and most patients had low risk of developing t-MN. This finding is reassuring, given long life expectancy of patients with eBC and the association of CHIP with morbidity and mortality. However, TP53-mutant CH with VAF ≥0.005 emerged with CT, which carries high risk of t-MN. Evolution of these small clones and their clinical significance warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Morganti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Christopher J Gibson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Qingchun Jin
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Katheryn Santos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Ashka Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Clinical Operations Department, Natera Inc, Austin, TX
| | - Alex Wilson
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Margaret Merrill
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Julie Vincuilla
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Marla Lipsyc-Sharf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Tonia Parker
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Tari A King
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Melissa E Hughes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel G Stover
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lachelle D Weeks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Judy E Garber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Center for Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Peter G Miller
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
- Center for Cancer Research and Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Heather A Parsons
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hu-Heimgartner K, Lang N, Ayme A, Ming C, Combes JD, Chappuis VN, Vazquez C, Friedlaender A, Vuilleumier A, Bodmer A, Viassolo V, Sandoval JL, Chappuis PO, Labidi-Galy SI. Hematologic toxicities of chemotherapy in breast and ovarian cancer patients carrying BRCA1/BRCA2 germline pathogenic variants. A single center experience and review of the literature. Fam Cancer 2023; 22:283-289. [PMID: 37119509 PMCID: PMC10276105 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-023-00331-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 play a central role in DNA repair and their germline pathogenic variants (gBRCA) confer a high risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. Standard chemotherapy regimens for these cancers include DNA-damaging agents. We hypothesized that gBRCA carriers might be at higher risk of developing chemotherapy-related hematologic toxicity and therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN). We conducted a retrospective study of women newly diagnosed with invasive breast or ovarian cancer who were screened for gBRCA1/gBRCA2 at Geneva University Hospitals. All patients were treated with (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy. We evaluated acute hematologic toxicities by analyzing the occurrence of febrile neutropenia and severe neutropenia (grade 4) at day 7-14 of the first cycle of chemotherapy and G-CSF use during the entire chemotherapy regimen. Characteristics of t-MN were collected. We reviewed medical records from 447 patients: 58 gBRCA1 and 40 gBRCA2 carriers and 349 non-carriers. gBRCA1 carriers were at higher risk of developing severe neutropenia (32% vs. 14.5%, p = 0.007; OR = 3.3, 95% CI [1.6-7], p = 0.001) and of requiring G-CSF for secondary prophylaxis (58.3% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.011; OR = 2.5, 95% CI [1.4-4.8], p = 0.004). gBRCA2 carriers did not show increased acute hematologic toxicities. t-MN were observed in 2 patients (1 gBRCA1 and one non-carrier). Our results suggested an increased acute hematologic toxicity upon exposure to chemotherapy for breast and ovarian cancer among gBRCA1 but not gBRCA2 carriers. A deeper characterization of t-MN is warranted with the recent development of PARP inhibitors in frontline therapy in gBRCA breast and ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ketty Hu-Heimgartner
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
| | - Noémie Lang
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
| | - Aurélie Ayme
- Department of Diagnostics, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Chang Ming
- Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Damien Combes
- Infections and Cancer Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Victor N Chappuis
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
| | - Carla Vazquez
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
| | - Alex Friedlaender
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
| | - Aurélie Vuilleumier
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
| | - Alexandre Bodmer
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
| | - Valeria Viassolo
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
| | - José L Sandoval
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
| | - Pierre O Chappuis
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland
- Department of Diagnostics, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - S Intidhar Labidi-Galy
- Department of Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, Geneva, 1205, Switzerland.
- Center of Translational Research in Onco-Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Swiss Cancer Center Leman, Genève, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Braybrooke J, Bradley R, Gray R, Hills RK, Pan H, Peto R, Dodwell D, McGale P, Taylor C, Aihara T, Anderson S, Blum J, Cardoso F, Chen X, Crown JP, Ejlertsen B, Friedl TWP, Harbeck N, Janni W, Jensen MB, Mamounas E, Narui K, Nitz U, Norton L, O'Shaughnessy J, Piccart M, Robert N, Shao ZM, Slamon D, Sparano J, Watanabe T, Yothers G, Yu KD, Berry R, Boddington C, Clarke M, Davies C, Davies L, Duane F, Evans V, Gay J, Gettins L, Godwin J, James S, Lui H, Lui Z, MacKinnon E, Mannu G, McHugh T, Morris P, Read S, Straiton E, Buzdar A, Suman VJ, Hunt KK, Leonard RCF, Mansi J, Delbaldo C, Piedbois P, Quinaux E, Fesl C, Gnant M, Sölkner L, Steger G, Eikesdal HP, Lønning PE, Bee V, Fung H, Mackey J, Martin M, Press M, De Azambuja E, Gelber R, Regan M, Di Leo A, Van Dooren V, Nogaret JM, Bartlett J, Chen BE, Gelmon K, Goss PE, Levine MN, Parulekar W, Pritchard KI, Shepherd L, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Shulman LN, Winer E, Gelman RS, Harris JR, Henderson C, Shapiro CL, Christiansen P, Ewertz M, Mouridsen HT, Van Leeuwen E, Linn S, Van Rossum AGJ, Van Tinteren H, Van Werkhoven E, Goldstein L, Gray R, Eiermann W, Gianni L, Valagussa P, Bogaerts J, Bonnefoi H, Poncet C, Huovinen R, Joensuu H, Bonneterre J, Fargeot P, Fumoleau P, Kerbrat P, Luporsi E, Namer M, Carrasco EM, Segui MA, Meisner C, Loibl S, Nekljudova V, Thomssen C, Von Minckwitz G, Kümmel S, Lopez M, Vici P, Fountzilas G, Koliou G, Mavroudis D, Saloustros E, Brain E, Delaloge S, Michiels S, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Bines J, Sarmento RMB, Bonadonna G, Brambilla C, Rossi A, Bliss J, Coombes RC, Kilburn L, Marty M, Amadori D, Boccardo F, Nanni O, Rubagotti A, Scarpi E, Masuda N, Toi M, Ueno T, Ishikawa T, Matsumoto K, Takao S, Sommer H, Foroglou P, Giokas G, Kondylis D, Lissaios B, Reinisch M, Lee KS, Nam BH, Ro JS, De Matteis A, Perrone F, Tang G, Wolmark N, Hozumi Y, Nomura Y, Earl H, Hiller L, Vallier AL, De Mastro L, Venturini M, Delozier T, Lemonnier J, Martin AL, Roché H, Spielmann M, Chen X, Shen K, Albain K, Barlow W, Budd GT, Gralow J, Hayes D, Bartlett-Lee P, Ellis P, Bianco AR, De Laurentiis M, De Placido S, Wildiers H, Hsu L, Eremin O, Walker LG, Ahlgren J, Blomqvist C, Holmberg L, Lindman H, Asmar L, Jones SE, Gluz O, Liedtke C, Arriagada R, Bergsten-Nordström E, Carey L, Coleman R, Cuzick J, Davidson N, Dignam J, Dowsett M, Francis PA, Goetz MP, Goodwin P, Halpin-Murphy P, Hill C, Jagsi R, Mukai H, Ohashi Y, Pierce L, Poortmans P, Raina V, Rea D, Robertson J, Rutgers E, Salgado R, Spanic T, Tutt A, Viale G, Wang X, Whelan T, Wilcken N, Cameron D, Bergh J, Swain SM. Anthracycline-containing and taxane-containing chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer: a patient-level meta-analysis of 100 000 women from 86 randomised trials. Lancet 2023; 401:1277-1292. [PMID: 37061269 PMCID: PMC11023015 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00285-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer substantially improves survival compared with no chemotherapy. However, concerns about short-term and long-term side-effects of anthracyclines have led to increased use of taxane chemotherapy without anthracycline, which could compromise efficacy. We aimed to better characterise the benefits and risks of including anthracycline, and the comparative benefits of different anthracycline-taxane regimens. METHODS We did an individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing taxane regimens with versus without anthracycline, and updated our previous meta-analysis of anthracycline regimens with versus without taxane, as well as analysing 44 trials in six related comparisons. We searched databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and meeting abstracts to identify trials assessing anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy. Adjuvant or neoadjuvant trials were eligible if they began before Jan 1, 2012. Primary outcomes were breast cancer recurrence and cause-specific mortality. Log-rank analyses yielded first-event rate ratios (RRs) and CIs. FINDINGS 28 trials of taxane regimens with or without anthracycline were identified, of which 23 were deemed eligible, and 15 provided data on 18 103 women. Across all 15 trials that provided individual data, recurrence rates were 14% lower on average (RR 0·86, 95% CI 0·79-0·93; p=0·0004) with taxane regimens including anthracycline than those without. Non-breast cancer deaths were not increased but there was one additional acute myeloid leukaemia case per 700 women treated. The clearest reductions in recurrence were found when anthracycline was added concurrently to docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide versus the same dose of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (10-year recurrence risk 12·3% vs 21·0%; risk difference 8·7%, 95% CI 4·5-12·9; RR 0·58, 0·47-0·73; p<0·0001). 10-year breast cancer mortality in this group was reduced by 4·2% (0·4-8·1; p=0·0034). No significant reduction in recurrence risk was found for sequential schedules of taxane plus anthracycline when compared with docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (RR 0·94, 0·83-1·06; p=0·30). For the analysis of anthracycline regimens with versus without taxane, 35 trials (n=52 976) provided individual patient data. Larger recurrence reductions were seen from adding taxane to anthracycline regimens when the cumulative dose of anthracycline was the same in each group (RR 0·87, 0·82-0·93; p<0·0001; n=11 167) than in trials with two-fold higher cumulative doses of non-taxane (mostly anthracycline) in the control group than in the taxane group (RR 0·96, 0·90-1·03; p=0·27; n=14 620). Direct comparisons between anthracycline and taxane regimens showed that a higher cumulative dose and more dose-intense schedules were more efficacious. The proportional reductions in recurrence for taxane plus anthracycline were similar in oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen receptor-negative disease, and did not differ by age, nodal status, or tumour size or grade. INTERPRETATION Anthracycline plus taxane regimens are most efficacious at reducing breast cancer recurrence and death. Regimens with higher cumulative doses of anthracycline plus taxane provide the greatest benefits, challenging the current trend in clinical practice and guidelines towards non-anthracycline chemotherapy, particularly shorter regimens, such as four cycles of docetaxel-cyclophosphamide. By bringing together data from almost all relevant trials, this meta-analysis provides a reliable evidence base to inform individual treatment decisions, clinical guidelines, and the design of future clinical trials. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim D, Oh J, Seok JH, Lee HS, Jeon S, Yoon CI. Risk of Secondary Cancer after Adjuvant Tamoxifen Treatment for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Nationwide Cohort Study in South Korea. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13040792. [PMID: 36832280 PMCID: PMC9954831 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Endocrine therapy is the mainstay treatment for hormone receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ. The aim of this study was to examine the long-term secondary malignancy risk of tamoxifen therapy. The data of patients diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2007 and December 2015 were retrieved from the database of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of South Korea. The International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, was used to track all-site cancers. Age at the time of surgery, chronic disease status, and type of surgery were considered covariates in the propensity score matching analysis. The median follow-up duration was 89 months. Forty-one patients in the tamoxifen group and nine in the control group developed endometrial cancer. The Cox regression hazard ratio model showed that tamoxifen therapy was the only significant predictor of the development of endometrial cancer (hazard ratio, 2.791; 95% confidence interval, 1.355-5.747; p = 0.0054). No other type of cancer was associated with long-term tamoxifen use. In consonance with the established knowledge, the real-world data in this study demonstrated that tamoxifen therapy is related to an increased incidence of endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dooreh Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
| | - Jooyoung Oh
- Department of Psychiatry, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Ho Seok
- Department of Psychiatry, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Sun Lee
- Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Soyoung Jeon
- Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Ik Yoon
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-2-2258-6109
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Howard FM, He G, Peterson JR, Pfeiffer JR, Earnest T, Pearson AT, Abe H, Cole JA, Nanda R. Highly accurate response prediction in high-risk early breast cancer patients using a biophysical simulation platform. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 196:57-66. [PMID: 36063220 PMCID: PMC9550684 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06722-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in early breast cancer (EBC) is largely dependent on breast cancer subtype, but no clinical-grade model exists to predict response and guide selection of treatment. A biophysical simulation of response to NAC has the potential to address this unmet need. METHODS We conducted a retrospective evaluation of a biophysical simulation model as a predictor of pCR. Patients who received standard NAC at the University of Chicago for EBC between January 1st, 2010 and March 31st, 2020 were included. Response was predicted using baseline breast MRI, clinicopathologic features, and treatment regimen by investigators who were blinded to patient outcomes. RESULTS A total of 144 tumors from 141 patients were included; 59 were triple-negative, 49 HER2-positive, and 36 hormone-receptor positive/HER2 negative. Lymph node disease was present in half of patients, and most were treated with an anthracycline-based regimen (58.3%). Sensitivity and specificity of the biophysical simulation for pCR were 88.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75.7 - 95.5) and 89.4% (95% CI 81.3 - 94.8), respectively, with robust results regardless of subtype. In patients with predicted pCR, 5-year event-free survival was 98%, versus 79% with predicted residual disease (log-rank p = 0.01, HR 4.57, 95% CI 1.36 - 15.34). At a median follow-up of 5.4 years, no patients with predicted pCR experienced disease recurrence. CONCLUSION A biophysical simulation model accurately predicts pCR and long-term outcomes from baseline MRI and clinical data, and is a promising tool to guide escalation/de-escalation of NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederick M Howard
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue
- MC 2115, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
| | - Gong He
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue
- MC 2115, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | | | | | | | - Alexander T Pearson
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue
- MC 2115, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Abe
- Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Rita Nanda
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue
- MC 2115, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Taira N, Sawaki M, Uemura Y, Saito T, Baba S, Kobayashi K, Kawashima H, Tsuneizumi M, Sagawa N, Bando H, Takahashi M, Yamaguchi M, Takashima T, Nakayama T, Kashiwaba M, Mizuno T, Yamamoto Y, Iwata H, Ohashi Y, Mukai H, Kawahara T. Health-Related Quality of Life With Trastuzumab Monotherapy Versus Trastuzumab Plus Standard Chemotherapy as Adjuvant Therapy in Older Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2452-2462. [PMID: 33835842 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We report findings on quality of life (QoL) in the RESPECT trial, which compared adjuvant trastuzumab monotherapy with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in older patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 70-80 years with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive surgically treated breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab (T) or trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (T + C). QoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire, and Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence at baseline and after 2, 12, and 36 months. Comparisons were based on individual changes from baseline and were performed by Fisher's test or mixed-model repeated-measures. RESULTS Among 275 patients in the parent study, 231 (84%) (average age: 74 years) were included in the analysis. At 2, 12, and 36 months, 198, 177, and 178 patients completed surveys, and the mean FACT-G scores at each survey point were 78.9, 80.4, 82.7, and 79.1 in group T and 79.5, 74.5, 78.4, and 78.5 in group T + C. Compared with group T + C, the proportion of patients showing QoL deterioration (≥ 5 points decrease from baseline in FACT-G) was significantly lower at 2 months (31% v 48%; P = .016) and 12 months (19% v 38%; P = .009). In group T, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score (P = .003) and the proportion of severe sensory peripheral neuropathy (P = .001) were significantly lower at 2 months, and Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale and Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence scores were significantly higher (P = .024, .042) at 12 months. At 36 months, there were no significant differences in any QoL items. CONCLUSION Detrimental effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on global QoL, morale, and activity capacity lasted for at least 12 months but were not observed at 36 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naruto Taira
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Masataka Sawaki
- Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukari Uemura
- Biostatistics Section, Department of Data Science, Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Saito
- Department of Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Saitama Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shinichi Baba
- Department of Surgery, Sagara Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Kokoro Kobayashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Michiko Tsuneizumi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Noriko Sagawa
- Department of Breast Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan
| | - Hiroko Bando
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masato Takahashi
- Department of Breast Surgery, NHO Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Miki Yamaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, JCHO Kurume General Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Takashima
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Nakayama
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Toshiro Mizuno
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan
| | - Yutaka Yamamoto
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hiroji Iwata
- Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yasuo Ohashi
- Department of Integrated Science and Engineering for Sustainable Society, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Mukai
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Takuya Kawahara
- Biostatistics Division, Clinical Research Support Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shachar SS, Deal AM, Reeder-Hayes KE, Nyrop KA, Mitin N, Anders CK, Carey LA, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Muss HB. Effects of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens on Expression of the Aging Biomarker, p16INK4a. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2020; 4:pkaa082. [PMID: 33409457 PMCID: PMC7771421 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although chemotherapy saves lives, increasing evidence shows that chemotherapy accelerates aging. We previously demonstrated that mRNA expression of p16INK4a , a biomarker of senescence and molecular aging, increased early and dramatically after beginning adjuvant anthracycline-based regimens in early stage breast cancer patients. Here, we determined if changes in p16INK4a expression vary by chemotherapy regimen among early stage breast cancer patients. METHODS We conducted a study of stage I-III breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. p16INK4a expression was analyzed prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy (median 6.2 months after the last chemotherapy) in peripheral blood T lymphocytes. Chemotherapy-induced change in p16INK4a expression was compared among regimens. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS In 146 women, chemotherapy was associated with a statistically significant increase in p16INK4a expression (accelerated aging of 17 years; P < .001). Anthracycline-based regimens were associated with the largest increases (accelerated aging of 23 to 26 years; P ≤ .008). Nonanthracycline-based regimens demonstrated a much smaller increase (accelerated aging of 9 to 11 years; P ≤ .15). In addition to the type of chemotherapy regimen, baseline p16INK4a levels, but not chronologic age or race, were also associated with the magnitude of increases in p16INK4a . Patients with lower p16INK4a levels at baseline were more likely to experience larger increases. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the aging effects of chemotherapy may be influenced by both chemotherapy type and the patient's baseline p16INK4a level. Measurement of p16INK4a expression is not currently available in the clinic, but nonanthracycline regimens offering similar efficacy as anthracycline regimens might be favored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Katherine E Reeder-Hayes
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kirsten A Nyrop
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Lisa A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - E Claire Dees
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Trevor A Jolly
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Raquel E Reinbolt
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Hyman B Muss
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Evolving Complexity of Treating Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2)-Negative Breast Cancer: Special Considerations in Older Breast Cancer Patients-Part I: Early-Stage Disease. Drugs Aging 2020; 37:331-348. [PMID: 32100240 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-020-00748-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The median age for breast cancer diagnosis is 62 years, but a disproportionate number of patients are over the age of 75 years and the majority of those have hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative cancers. This review provides a logical algorithm to guide providers through the many complicated issues involved in adjuvant systemic therapy decisions in older patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. For this subtype of breast cancer, the mainstay of treatment is surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor (AI). Adjuvant chemotherapy is added to the treatment regimen when the benefits of treatment are deemed to outweigh the risks, making the risk-benefit discussion particularly important in older women. Traditional tools for cancer risk assessment and genomic expression profiles (GEPs) are under-utilized in older patients, but yield equally useful information about cancer prognosis as they do in younger patients. Additionally, there are tools that estimate life-limiting toxicity risk from chemotherapy and life expectancy, which are both important issues in the risk-benefit discussion. For very low-risk cancers, such as non-invasive and small lymph node (LN)-negative cancers, the benefits of any adjuvant therapy is likely outweighed by the risks, but endocrine therapy might be considered to prevent future new breast cancers. For invasive tumors that are > 5 mm (T1b or larger) or involve LNs, adjuvant endocrine therapy is recommended. Generally, AIs should be included, though tamoxifen is effective and should be offered when AIs are not tolerated. Bone-preserving agents and high-dose vitamin D are options to preserve bone density or treat osteoporosis, especially in older women who are taking AIs. Where the risk-reducing benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy outweighs the toxicity risk, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered. Adjuvant chemotherapy has similar benefits in older and younger patients and standard regimens are preferred. Several exciting clinic trials are underway and have included older patients, including those adding molecularly targeted agents, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors and everolimus, to endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting. The high incidence of breast cancer in older women should drive us to design clinical trials for this population and emphasize their inclusion in ongoing trials as much as possible.
Collapse
|
9
|
Koduru P, Chen W, Haley B, Ho K, Oliver D, Wilson K. Cytogenomic characterization of double minute heterogeneity in therapy related acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Genet 2019; 238:69-75. [PMID: 31425928 DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy regimens containing alkylating agents and anthracyclines are at an increased risk for secondary myeloid malignancies, either acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Complex genomic changes (karyotypes and/or gene amplification) accompany the development of the secondary neoplasms. Here we present a unique case of a breast cancer patient who developed secondary AML within 18 months of treatment with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, docetaxel, carboplatin (TCHP) and radiation. Leukemia cells had catastrophic alterations in chromosomes 8, 11, and 17. Genetic abnormalities in the leukemia cells included amplification of MYC and KMT2A as double minutes, and deletion and mutational inactivation of TP53 Concurrent amplification of different genes at different levels and on different double minutes, we have named "double minute heterogeneity." Clinically, this case highlights the need to identify genes amplified in secondary myeloid malignancies by cytogenomic microarray (CMA) analysis since these may have therapeutic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prasad Koduru
- Department of Pathology, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
| | - Weina Chen
- Department of Pathology, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Barbara Haley
- Department of Pathology, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Kevin Ho
- Department of Pathology, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Dwight Oliver
- Department of Pathology, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Kathleen Wilson
- Department of Pathology, and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reinisch M, Gluz O, Ataseven B, Blohmer JU, Budner M, Dittmer-Grabowski C, Kohls A, Krocker J, Kümmel A, Hagemann F, Rüland A, Traut A, Kümmel S. Updated Survival Analysis after a Median Follow-up of 12 Years of an Anthracycline-Containing Adjuvant Prospective Multicentre, Randomised Phase III Trial on Dose-Dense Chemotherapy in Primary Node-Positive, High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients. Breast Care (Basel) 2019; 14:159-164. [PMID: 31316314 DOI: 10.1159/000491792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although dose-dense (dd) chemotherapy plays a fundamental role in the treatment of breast cancer (BC), a variety of trials have presented divergent survival results. Here, we present data of patients with more than 3 positive axillary lymph nodes (+aLN) receiving dd chemotherapy after a median follow-up period of 12.3 years. Methods In the years 1996-2000, 231 patients with invasive BC, ≥pN2a and no evidence of distant metastases were recruited to receive treatment A, i.e. dd 3 × epirubicin (E, 90 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) + paclitaxel (P, 175 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) every 2 weeks (q2w) followed by 3 × cyclophosphamide (C)/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF, 600/40/600 mg/m<sup>2</sup>, q2w), or treatment B, i.e. 4 × E + C (C, 600 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) q3w followed by 3 × CMF q3w. Results 113 patients in arm A and 113 patients in arm B were analysed after an updated median follow-up of 12.3 years. The median age was 55 years, with a median number of 6 +aLN, 50.4% had a T2 and 79.2% hormone receptor-positive BC. The disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 53.1% in arm A and 42.5% in arm B (adjusted p = 0.027). The overall survival (OS) rate was 54.9% in arm A and 48.7% in arm B (adjusted p = 0.058). In the multivariable analysis, the tumour burden was a significant predictor for DFS and OS. Conclusion The adjuvant use of dd chemotherapy led to a statistically significant improvement of DFS after a follow-up of 12.3 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattea Reinisch
- Breast Unit, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Oleg Gluz
- Bethesda Hospital, Breast Center Niederrhein, Mönchengladbach, Germany; West German Study Group, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Beyhan Ataseven
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Marek Budner
- Breast Unit, Helios Klinikum, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Kohls
- Breast Unit, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Ludwigsfelde-Teltow, Germany
| | - Jutta Krocker
- Breast Unit, Sana Klinikum Berlin-Lichtenberg, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aylin Kümmel
- Breast Unit, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Friederike Hagemann
- Breast Unit, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - Anna Rüland
- Breast Unit, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Sherko Kümmel
- Breast Unit, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wöckel A, Festl J, Stüber T, Brust K, Krockenberger M, Heuschmann PU, Jírů-Hillmann S, Albert US, Budach W, Follmann M, Janni W, Kopp I, Kreienberg R, Kühn T, Langer T, Nothacker M, Scharl A, Schreer I, Link H, Engel J, Fehm T, Weis J, Welt A, Steckelberg A, Feyer P, König K, Hahne A, Baumgartner T, Kreipe HH, Knoefel WT, Denkinger M, Brucker S, Lüftner D, Kubisch C, Gerlach C, Lebeau A, Siedentopf F, Petersen C, Bartsch HH, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hahn M, Hanf V, Müller-Schimpfle M, Henscher U, Roncarati R, Katalinic A, Heitmann C, Honegger C, Paradies K, Bjelic-Radisic V, Degenhardt F, Wenz F, Rick O, Hölzel D, Zaiss M, Kemper G, Budach V, Denkert C, Gerber B, Tesch H, Hirsmüller S, Sinn HP, Dunst J, Münstedt K, Bick U, Fallenberg E, Tholen R, Hung R, Baumann F, Beckmann MW, Blohmer J, Fasching P, Lux MP, Harbeck N, Hadji P, Hauner H, Heywang-Köbrunner S, Huober J, Hübner J, Jackisch C, Loibl S, Lück HJ, von Minckwitz G, Möbus V, Müller V, Nöthlings U, Schmidt M, Schmutzler R, Schneeweiss A, Schütz F, Stickeler E, Thomssen C, Untch M, Wesselmann S, Bücker A, Buck A, Stangl S. Interdisciplinary Screening, Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Breast Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/045OL, December 2017) - Part 2 with Recommendations for the Therapy of Primary, Recurrent and Advanced Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:1056-1088. [PMID: 30581198 PMCID: PMC6261741 DOI: 10.1055/a-0646-4630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this official guideline coordinated and published by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the German Cancer Society (DKG) was to optimize the screening, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Method The process of updating the S3 guideline published in 2012 was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines. They were combined with reviews of evidence compiled using PICO (Patients/Interventions/Control/Outcome) questions and with the results of a systematic search of literature databases followed by the selection and evaluation of the identified literature. The interdisciplinary working groups took the identified materials as their starting point and used them to develop suggestions for recommendations and statements, which were then modified and graded in a structured consensus process procedure. Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the therapy of primary, recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. Loco-regional therapies are de-escalated in the current guideline. In addition to reducing the safety margins for surgical procedures, the guideline also recommends reducing the radicality of axillary surgery. The choice and extent of systemic therapy depends on the respective tumor biology. New substances are becoming available, particularly to treat metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achim Wöckel
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jasmin Festl
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Stüber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Brust
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Würzburg, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Peter U. Heuschmann
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Steffi Jírů-Hillmann
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Wilfried Budach
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | - Ina Kopp
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Kühn
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Langer
- Office des Leitlinienprogrammes Onkologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Monika Nothacker
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | - Anton Scharl
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Amberg, Germany
| | | | - Hartmut Link
- Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Jutta Engel
- Tumorregister München, Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Joachim Weis
- Stiftungsprofessur Selbsthilfeforschung, Tumorzentrum/CCC Freiburg, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anja Welt
- Innere Klinik (Tumorforschung), Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Petra Feyer
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Vivantes Klinikum, Neukölln Berlin, Germany
| | - Klaus König
- Berufsverband der Frauenärzte, Steinbach, Germany
| | | | | | - Hans H. Kreipe
- Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Wolfram Trudo Knoefel
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Michael Denkinger
- AGAPLESION Bethesda Klinik, Geriatrie der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Sara Brucker
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian Kubisch
- Institut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina Gerlach
- III. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, uct, Interdisziplinäre Abteilung für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz, Germany
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Cordula Petersen
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Markus Hahn
- Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Volker Hanf
- Frauenklinik Nathanstift, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany
| | | | | | - Renza Roncarati
- Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs – Bundesverband e. V., Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander Katalinic
- Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christoph Heitmann
- Ästhetisch plastische und rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Camparihaus München, München, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Paradies
- Konferenz Onkologischer Kranken- und Kinderkrankenpflege, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- Universitätsfrauenklinik, Abteilung für Gynäkologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Friedrich Degenhardt
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frederik Wenz
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Oliver Rick
- Klinik Reinhardshöhe Bad Wildungen, Bad Wildungen, Germany
| | - Dieter Hölzel
- Tumorregister München, Institut für medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Matthias Zaiss
- Praxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie & Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Volker Budach
- Klinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institut für Pathologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Gerber
- Universitätsfrauenklinik am Klinikum Südstadt, Rostock, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Hans-Peter Sinn
- Pathologisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Dunst
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Karsten Münstedt
- Frauenklinik Offenburg, Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg-Gengenbach, Offenburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bick
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Fallenberg
- Klinik für Radiologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reina Tholen
- Deutscher Verband für Physiotherapie, Referat Bildung und Wissenschaft, Köln, Germany
| | - Roswita Hung
- Frauenselbsthilfe nach Krebs, Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Freerk Baumann
- Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie Köln, Uniklinik Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jens Blohmer
- Klinik für Gynäkologie incl. Brustzentrum, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Fasching
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, CCC Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Brustzentrum, Frauenklinik, Universität München (LMU), München, Germany
| | - Peyman Hadji
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Hauner
- Lehrstuhl für Ernährungsmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | | | | | - Jutta Hübner
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Christian Jackisch
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Volker Möbus
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Gynäkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ute Nöthlings
- Institut für Ernährungs- und Lebensmittelwissenschaften, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marcus Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Geburtshilfe und Frauengesundheit, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mai, Germany nz, Mainz
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Zentrum Familiärer Brust- und Eierstockkrebs, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Klinik für Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Arno Bücker
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie am UKS, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Nuklearmedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik des Universitätsklinikums Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stangl
- Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|