Intratumoral heterogeneity on dedicated breast positron emission tomography predicts malignancy grade of breast cancer

Clinical Applications of Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography

Breast-specific positron imaging systems provide higher sensitivity than whole-body PET for breast cancer detection. The clinical applications for breast-specific positron imaging are similar to breast MRI including preoperative local staging and neoadjuvant therapy response assessment. Breast-specific positron imaging may be an alternative for patients who cannot undergo breast MRI. Further research is needed in expanding the field-of-view for posterior breast lesions, increasing biopsy capability, and reducing radiation dose. Efforts are also necessary for developing appropriate use criteria, increasing availability, and advancing insurance coverage.

Deep learning model with collage images for the segmentation of dedicated breast positron emission tomography images

BACKGROUND

Dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) has high contrast and resolution optimized for detecting small breast cancers, leading to its noisy characteristics. This study evaluated the application of deep learning to the automatic segmentation of abnormal uptakes on dbPET to facilitate the assessment of lesions. To address data scarcity in model training, we used collage images composed of cropped abnormal uptakes and normal breasts for data augmentation.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 1598 examinations between April 2015 and August 2020. A U-Net-based model with an uptake shape classification head was trained using either the original or augmented dataset comprising collage images. The Dice score, which measures the pixel-wise agreement between a prediction and its ground truth, of the models was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Moreover, the classification accuracies were evaluated.

RESULTS

After applying the exclusion criteria, 662 breasts were included; among these, 217 breasts had abnormal uptakes (mean age: 58 ± 14 years). Abnormal uptakes on the cranio-caudal and mediolateral maximum intensity projection images of 217 breasts were annotated and labeled as focus, mass, or non-mass. The inclusion of collage images into the original dataset yielded a Dice score of 0.884 and classification accuracy of 91.5%. Improvement in the Dice score was observed across all subgroups, and the score of images without breast cancer improved significantly from 0.750 to 0.834 (effect size: 0.76, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Deep learning can be applied for the automatic segmentation of dbPET, and collage images can improve model performance.

The influence of receptor expression and clinical subtypes on baseline [18F]FDG uptake in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To quantify the relationship between [18F]FDG uptake of the primary tumour measured by PET-imaging with immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, and clinical subtypes based on these markers in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched for studies that compared SUVmax between breast cancer patients negative and positive for IHC expression of ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, and clinical subtypes based on these markers. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted the data. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models. P values less than or equal to 5% indicated statistically significant results.

RESULTS

Fifty studies were included in the final analysis. SUVmax is significantly higher in ER-negative (31 studies, SMD 0.66, 0.56-0.77, P < 0.0001), PR-negative (30 studies, SMD 0.56; 0.40-0.71, P < 0.0001), HER2-positive (32 studies, SMD - 0.29, - 0.49 to - 0.10, P = 0.0043) or Ki-67-positive (19 studies, SMD - 0.77; - 0.93 to - 0.61, P < 0.0001) primary tumours compared to their counterparts. The majority of clinical subtypes were either luminal A (LA), luminal B (LB), HER2-positive or triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). LA is associated with significantly lower SUVmax compared to LB (11 studies, SMD - 0.49, - 0.68 to - 0.31, P = 0.0001), HER2-positive (15 studies, SMD - 0.91, - 1.21 to - 0.61, P < 0.0001) and TNBC (17 studies, SMD - 1.21, - 1.57 to - 0.85, P < 0.0001); and LB showed significantly lower uptake compared to TNBC (10 studies, SMD - 0.77, - 1.05 to - 0.49, P = 0.0002). Differences in SUVmax between LB and HER2-positive (9 studies, SMD - 0.32, - 0.88 to 0.24, P = 0.2244), and HER2-positive and TNBC (17 studies, SMD - 0.29, - 0.61 to 0.02, P = 0.0667) are not significant.

CONCLUSION

Primary tumour SUVmax is significantly higher in ER-negative, PR-negative, HER2-positive and Ki-67-positive breast cancer patients. Luminal tumours have the lowest and TNBC tumours the highest SUVmax. HER2 overexpression has an intermediate effect.

Four Patterns of Abnormal Ring-Like Uptakes on Dedicated Breast PET

ABSTRACT

The high resolution of dedicated breast PET (dbPET) enables the visualization of small breast cancers and a heterogeneity of breast tumors. Some tumors present with a ring-like appearance, the central uptake defect possibly reflecting intratumoral fibrosis and necrosis, associated with high-grade malignancy, and a triple-negative subtype. However, a ring-like finding is not only found in high-grade breast cancers. We describe 4 representative patterns of ring-like uptakes on dbPET: high-grade invasive cancer, intracystic tumor, extended noninvasive carcinoma, and change after vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Ring-like uptakes on dbPET should be evaluated in association with clinical information.

Malignant prediction of incidental findings using ring-type dedicated breast positron emission tomography

The classification according to uptake patterns and metabolic parameters on ring-type dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) is useful for detecting breast cancer. This study investigated the performance of dbPET for incidental findings that were not detected by mammography and ultrasonography. In 1,076 patients with breast cancer who underwent dbPET, 276 findings were incidentally diagnosed before treatment. Each finding was categorized as focus (uptake size ≤ 5 mm), mass (> 5 mm), or non-mass (multiple uptake) according to uptake patterns. Non-mass uptakes were additionally classified based on their distributions as-linear, focal, segmental, regional, or diffuse. Thirty-two findings (11.6%) were malignant and 244 (88.4%) were benign. Visually, 227 (82.3%) findings were foci, 7 (2.5%) were masses, and 42 (15.2%) were non-masses. Malignant rates of focus, mass, and non-mass were 9.7%, 28.6%, and 19.0%, respectively. In the non-mass findings, 23 were regional and diffuse distributions, and presented as benign lesions. Focus uptake with low lesion-to-background ratio (LBR) and no hereditary risk were relatively low (2.7%) in breast cancer. In multivariate analysis, LBR and hereditary risk were significantly associated with breast cancer (p = 0.006 and p = 0.013, respectively). Uptake patterns, LBR, and hereditary risk are useful for predicting breast cancer risk in incidental dbPET findings.

A Proposed Dedicated Breast PET Lexicon: Standardization of Description and Reporting of Radiotracer Uptake in the Breast

Dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) is a new diagnostic imaging modality recently used in clinical practice for the detection of breast cancer and the assessment of tumor biology. dbPET has higher spatial resolution than that of conventional whole body PET systems, allowing recognition of detailed morphological attributes of radiotracer accumulation within the breast. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) accumulation in the breast may be due to benign or malignant entities, and recent studies suggest that morphology characterization of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake could aid in estimating the probability of malignancy. However, across the world, there are many descriptors of breast ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, limiting comparisons between studies. In this article, we propose a lexicon for breast radiotracer uptake to standardize description and reporting of image findings on dbPET, consisting of terms for image quality, radiotracer fibroglandular uptake, breast lesion uptake.

Application-specific nuclear medicalin vivoimaging devices

Nuclear medical imaging devices, such as those enabling photon emission imaging (gamma camera, single photon emission computed tomography, or positron emission imaging), that are typically used in today's clinics are optimized for assessing large portions of the human body, and are classified as whole-body imaging systems. These systems have known limitations for organ imaging, therefore application-specific devices have been designed, constructed and evaluated. These devices, given their compact nature and superior technical characteristics, such as their higher detection sensitivity and spatial resolution for organ imaging compared to whole-body imaging systems, have shown promise for niche applications. Several of these devices have further been integrated with complementary anatomical imaging devices. The objectives of this review article are to (1) provide an overview of such application-specific nuclear imaging devices that were developed over the past two decades (in the twenty-first century), with emphasis on brain, cardiac, breast, and prostate imaging; and (2) discuss the rationale, advantages and challenges associated with the translation of these devices for routine clinical imaging. Finally, a perspective on the future prospects for application-specific devices is provided, which is that sustained effort is required both to overcome design limitations which impact their utility (where these exist) and to collect the data required to define their clinical value.

The relationship between ring-type dedicated breast PET and immune microenvironment in early breast cancer

PURPOSE

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography (PET) is related to the biological parameters and prognosis of breast cancer. However, whether whole-body PET (WBPET) and dedicated breast PET (DbPET) can reflect the tumor microenvironment is unclear. This study investigated the relationship between stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in WBPET and DbPET.

METHODS

A total of 125 invasive breast cancers underwent WBPET and ring-type DbPET and resected specimens were pathologically assessed. The impact of SUVmax on the tumor biological parameters and TILs was retrospectively evaluated. SUVmax was classified as high and low relative to the median values (WBPET-SUVmax: 2.2 and DbPET-SUVmax: 6.0).

RESULTS

SUVmax correlated with tumor size, nuclear grade, Ki-67 labeling index, and TILs in both WBPET and DbPET (all p < 0.001). In multiple linear regression analysis, tumor size, Ki-67 labeling index, and TILs predicted SUVmax in WBPET and DbPET. The cutoff values of tumor size, Ki-67 labeling index, and TILs predicting high SUVmax were 20 mm, 20%, and 20%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the predictive factors for high SUVmax were tumor size and Ki-67 labeling index for WBPET and tumor size and TILs for DbPET. High SUVmax in DbPET was related to high numbers of TILs after propensity score matching analysis; however, WBPET was not (p = 0.007 and p = 0.624, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Both SUVmax values in WBPET and DbPET predicted TIL concentration of the primary breast cancer. In DbPET, SUVmax represented the immune microenvironment after adjusting for tumor biological factors.

Distribution pattern of FDG uptake using ring-type dedicated breast PET in comparison to whole-body PET/CT scanning in invasive breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of rim uptake (RU) or multifocal uptake (MU) by invasive breast cancers on a ring-type dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) scanner compared with whole-body PET (wbPET) scanner imaging and to correlate uptake patterns with pathological features and prognosis.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2011, 76 lesions in 74 patients with primary invasive breast cancers were included. Each patient underwent dbPET and wbPET scanning on the same day after administration of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). The images were evaluated to identify specific uptake patterns (RU and MU). Their association with pathological characteristics and prognosis was analyzed.

RESULTS

On dbPET, RU and MU patterns were observed in 18 lesions (24%) and 28 lesions (37%), respectively. On wbPET, RU and MU patterns were observed in six lesions (8%) and 17 lesions (22%), respectively. Lesions with RU on dbPET were of higher grade than lesions without RU (P = 0.024) and a higher Ki-67 index (mean; 31% vs. 18%, P = 0.015). They tended to be triple-negative (33% vs. 12%, P = 0.046) and less likely to be luminal A subtype (17% vs. 47%, P = 0.020). On wbPET, however, no significant differences in these markers were seen between RU and non-RU. The MU pattern did not correlate with pathological characteristics in either scanner. Lesions with RU or MU were not significantly associated with disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

DbPET can identify detailed FDG distribution patterns of breast cancer better than wbPET. Breast cancer with RU on dbPET was associated with higher grade and triple-negative subtype.