Treatment-induced symptoms, depression and age as predictors of sexual problems in premenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy

Effects of Lasofoxifene Versus Fulvestrant on Vaginal and Vulvar Symptoms in Patients With ESR1-Mutated, ER+/HER2-, Metastatic Breast Cancer From the ELAINE 1 Study

BACKGROUND

Lasofoxifene, a novel endocrine therapy (ET), showed antitumor activity versus fulvestrant in women with ESR1-mutated, metastatic breast cancer (mBC) that progressed on prior ET (phase 2, ELAINE 1 study). We investigated changes in genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) vulvar-vaginal symptoms with lasofoxifene and how patient/disease characteristics affect baseline vulvar-vaginal symptoms in ELAINE 1.

METHODS

Women were randomized to oral lasofoxifene 5 mg/day or IM fulvestrant 500 mg (days 1, 15, and 29, then every 28 days) until disease progression/severe toxicity. Changes in mean vaginal (VAS) and vulvar (VuAS) assessment scales, and their composite (average of all symptom scores/patient), from baseline to week 16, and mean baseline VAS/VuAS scores by patient/disease characteristics, were descriptively summarized.

RESULTS

Of 103 enrolled patients, 72 (70%) completed the VAS/VuAS (mean age 61.5 years). Vaginal (40%)/vulvar (25%) dryness and vaginal pain (22%) were the most frequently reported symptoms; 26% reported ≥1 moderate/severe symptom. Lasofoxifene decreased the mean composite VAS/VuAS, VAS, and VuAS from baseline to week 16 by 74%, 74%, and 79%, respectively; fulvestrant increased them by 36%, 15%, and 63%, respectively. Baseline vaginal/vulvar symptoms were more severe if patients were under age 40, had no visceral disease, used adjuvant tamoxifen previously, or had longer AI duration in the adjuvant/metastatic settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral lasofoxifene (5 mg/day), but not fulvestrant, appears to improve GSM vaginal symptoms in women with mBC. These preliminary findings suggest further study is needed; such will be explored in the phase 3, registrational, ELAINE 3 trial in patients with ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- mBC.

Sexual function and satisfaction in young women with breast cancer: a 5-year prospective study

BACKGROUND

Young women with breast cancer (YWBC) face unique challenges that can affect their sexual health. This study aimed to identify factors associated with sexual activity, function, and satisfaction in YWBC up to 5 years postdiagnosis.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of 474 women 40 years of age or younger diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer in Mexico. Sexual function and satisfaction were assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index and the Sexual Satisfaction Inventory, respectively. Factors associated with sexual health outcomes were examined using mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

The prevalence of sexual dysfunction increased from 33.6% at baseline to 52.9% at 4-5 years postdiagnosis. Factors associated with worse sexual function included older age (mean predicted FSFI score = -1.35, P = .037), treatment-induced amenorrhea (-2.86, P < .001), depression (-4.11, P < .001), and anxiety (-2.13, P < .001). Lower sexual satisfaction was associated with lower educational attainment (mean predicted SSI score = -5.61, P = .002), being single (-6.41, P < .001), treatment-induced amenorrhea (-3.76, P = .004), bilateral oophorectomy (-8.21, P = .017), depression (-11.29, P < .001), and anxiety (-7.50, P < .001). Quality of life, body image, and systemic therapy side effects significantly affected both outcomes. Three distinct trajectories of sexual function were identified: high (62.2%), intermediate (24.3%), and markedly declining (13.5%). Four trajectories of sexual satisfaction were found, ranging from intermediate-to-high (57.3%) to progressively worsening (27.5%).

CONCLUSION

Sexual dysfunction is prevalent and persistent among YWBC. Multiple biological, psychological, and social factors influence sexual health outcomes in this population. These findings highlight the importance of routine screening and tailored interventions to address the sexual health of YWBC throughout survivorship.

Empowerment-Led Guided Self-Help Intervention for Symptom Burden in Breast Cancer Women Treated With Ovarian Function Suppression: A Randomized Trial Protocol

Background

Ovarian function suppression (OFS) treatment causes breast cancer patients' estrogens to fall rapidly to postmenopausal levels, and the 5-year treatment duration and 28-day treatment cycles place a heavy physical and psychological symptom burden on them, which in turn directly or indirectly affects the survival benefit. Managing symptom burden early in treatment is critical, but OFS-related studies have yet to be seen. Self-management is essential for patients' symptom burden. However, self-help management is hampered by patients' lack of knowledge, skills, motivation, etc. Guided self-help intervention (GSH) provides a feasible approach. Empowerment theory is a promising theoretical framework to guide self-management.

Methods

A prospective two-arm parallel randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial will be conducted to investigate the effect of symptom burden GSH based on empowerment theory in breast cancer patients in the early stages of OFS treatment. A block randomization method is used to allocate 144 patients to either the control or intervention group. The program is conducted according to the OFS return-to-hospital treatment cycle. The intervention group will receive a total of two rounds and five sessions of empowering GSH, lasting at least 15 weeks in total; the control group will receive only usual nursing care. Symptom burden and related metrics will be assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after OFS treatment, and changes between and within groups will be explored. This paper adhered to the SPIRIT and CONSORT guidelines.

Conclusion

These results will help to validate the GSH in symptom burden management for breast cancer patients in OFS treatment early stages. It enriches its symptom burden management research and may provide implications for the whole cycle of OFS treatment patients.

Incorporation of emergent symptoms and genetic covariates improves prediction of aromatase inhibitor therapy discontinuation

Objectives

Early discontinuation is common among breast cancer patients taking aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Although several predictors have been identified, it is unclear how to simultaneously consider multiple risk factors for an individual. We sought to develop a tool for prediction of AI discontinuation and to explore how predictive value of risk factors changes with time.

Materials and Methods

Survival machine learning was used to predict time-to-discontinuation of AIs in 181 women who enrolled in a prospective cohort. Models were evaluated via time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), c-index, and integrated Brier score. Feature importance was analysis was conducted via Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and time-dependence of their predictive value was analyzed by time-dependent AUC. Personalized survival curves were constructed for risk communication.

Results

The best-performing model incorporated genetic risk factors and changes in patient-reported outcomes, achieving mean time-dependent AUC of 0.66, and AUC of 0.72 and 0.67 at 6- and 12-month cutoffs, respectively. The most significant features included variants in ESR1 and emergent symptoms. Predictive value of genetic risk factors was highest in the first year of treatment. Decrease in physical function was the strongest independent predictor at follow-up.

Discussion and Conclusion

Incorporation of genomic and 3-month follow-up data improved the ability of the models to identify the individuals at risk of AI discontinuation. Genetic risk factors were particularly important for predicting early discontinuers. This study provides insight into the complex nature of AI discontinuation and highlights the importance of incorporating genetic risk factors and emergent symptoms into prediction models.

Treatment-induced menopause symptoms among women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy in China: a comparison to age- and menopause status-matched controls

OBJECTIVE

Whether women with breast cancer experience more severe menopause symptoms than comparison women without a history of breast cancer diagnosis remains unclear. We aimed to investigate whether women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy experience more severe menopause symptoms than comparison women and explore various factors influencing menopause symptoms in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

This cross-sectional observational study recruited 423 women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and 1,829 community women without breast cancer. All participants completed a questionnaire assessing menopause symptoms using the Menopause Rating Scale and general characteristics (eg, sociodemographic and clinical data). Propensity score matching was used to reduce the confounders between the two groups. Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square tests were used to compare the differences in menopause symptoms between the two groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to explore various factors influencing menopause symptoms in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 808 participants were included. The mean ages of women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and comparison women were 49.58 and 49.10 years, respectively. Women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy experienced significantly more severe vasomotor symptoms than comparison women. However, comparison women had higher Menopause Rating Scale scores and more severe menopause symptoms than women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Age, occupational status, chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea, family history of cancer, chemotherapy stage, mindfulness, resiliency, and illness perception were associated with menopause symptoms in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasomotor symptoms are prominent among women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Understanding the factors contributing to menopause symptoms is crucial for healthcare practitioners to develop supportive guidelines for the well-being of women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Sexual Function and Quality of Life Among Turkish Oncology Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Sexual health and sexual function in oncology patients are inseparable elements of general quality of life and important indicators of emotional well-being. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the quality of life and sexual function of oncology patients receiving chemotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

This cross-sectional and correlational study was conducted within the chemotherapy unit of a university hospital between June 25, 2017, and June 21, 2018. A total of 410 oncology outpatients participated in this study. Data were collected using the FACT-G Quality of Life Evaluation Scale, the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale, and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale.

CONCLUSION

A negative and weak statistically significant relationship between the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale total score and the FACT-G Quality of Life Evaluation Scale total score was found (r = -0.224, P < .01). The regression model where the FACT-G Quality of Life Evaluation Scale total scores (F = 3.263; P < .001) and Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale total scores (F = 8.937; P < .001) of the patients were taken as dependent variables and their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were taken as independent variables was found to be statistically significant.

IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Psychosocial and medical evaluation should be performed when a concern or problem regarding the sexual life of an oncology patient is detected. The sexual quality of life of oncology patients should be improved through sexual counseling and education. Patients and their families should be encouraged to participate in family support programs.

Sexual functioning among breast cancer survivors and non-cancer controls over 5 years post diagnosis: Pink SWAN

PURPOSE

To compare sexual functioning from diagnosis to 5 years post diagnosis among breast cancer survivors (BCS) and women without cancer (controls).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Analyses included 118 BCS and 1765 controls from 20 years of the longitudinal Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a multiracial/ethnic cohort of mid-life women assessed approximately annually from 1995 to 2015. Pink SWAN participants reported no cancer at SWAN enrollment and developed (BCS) or did not develop (controls) incident breast cancer after enrollment. Outcomes included: being sexually active or not, intercourse frequency, sexual desire, vaginal dryness, and pain with intercourse. Using longitudinal logistic regression, we compared BCS and controls on prevalence of sexual functioning outcomes with respect to years since diagnosis. In addition, we examined whether menopause transition stage, depressive symptoms, relationship satisfaction, vaginal dryness, or pain with intercourse modified the relation between breast cancer and sexual functioning outcomes.

RESULTS

Adjusting for partner status, both BCS and controls reported similar declines over time in being sexually active, sexual intercourse frequency, and sexual desire. Among sexually active women, more BCS than controls consistently reported vaginal dryness with significant differences between 2 and 4 years post-diagnosis, and pain with intercourse, with statistically significant differences between 0.5 years post-diagnosis to 2 years post-diagnosis. Being post-menopausal and reporting depressive symptoms were significant effect modifiers for pain with intercourse with both variables having positive and stronger associations with pain among the controls than among BCS.

CONCLUSION

Except for more reporting of vaginal dryness and pain with intercourse among BCS, negative changes in sexual function during mid-life were similar in those with and without breast cancer.

Adjuvant Exemestane With Ovarian Suppression in Premenopausal Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Combined TEXT and SOFT Trials

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The combined analysis of SOFT-TEXT compared outcomes in 4,690 premenopausal women with estrogen/progesterone receptor-positive (ER/PgR+) early breast cancer randomly assigned to 5 years of exemestane + ovarian function suppression (OFS) versus tamoxifen + OFS. After a median follow-up of 9 years, exemestane + OFS significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), but not overall survival, compared with tamoxifen + OFS. We now report DFS, DRFI, and overall survival after a median follow-up of 13 years. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the 12-year DFS (4.6% absolute improvement, hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.90; P < .001) and DRFI (1.8% absolute improvement, HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.98; P = .03), but not overall survival (90.1% v 89.1%, HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.11), continued to be significantly improved for patients assigned exemestane + OFS over tamoxifen + OFS. Among patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors (86.0% of the ITT population), the absolute improvement in 12-year overall survival with exemestane + OFS was 2.0% (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.04) and 3.3% in those who received chemotherapy (45.9% of the ITT population). Overall survival benefit was clinically significant in high-risk patients, eg, women age < 35 years (4.0%) and those with > 2 cm (4.5%) or grade 3 tumors (5.5%). These sustained reductions of the risk of recurrence with adjuvant exemestane + OFS, compared with tamoxifen + OFS, provide guidance for selecting patients for whom exemestane should be preferred over tamoxifen in the setting of OFS.[Media: see text].

Sexual Perception in Spanish Female Breast Cancer Survivors. Cross-Sectional Survey

BACKGROUND

The aim was to assess sexual perception in female breast cancer survivors and establish if women presenting with sexual dysfunctions symptoms receive pelvic floor physiotherapy or request information on treatment.

METHODS

Cross-sectional survey carried out between January and March 2021. An online survey designed by the authors was structured in 3 dimensions: demographic and anthropometric data, medical data and sexual perception data. An open format survey with 23 questions available to any website visitor. The survey followed the CHERRIES guidelines. The study included 130 women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The presence of pain during sexual activity was reported in 56.92% of cases. Specifically, 40.8% reported superficial dyspareunia, which is most commonly expressed by women as a "stinging pain." Surprisingly, only 4.6% of the women had received any type of pelvic floor physiotherapy treatment or had sought information.

CONCLUSIONS

Women breast cancer survivors have a negative perception of their sexuality. In addition, there is a lack of knowledge about the role of physiotherapy in sexual dysfunction, and only a small percentage of women received pelvic floor treatment or information to address their sexual dysfunction.

Understanding pain related to adjuvant endocrine therapy after breast cancer: A qualitative report

OBJECTIVES

Most patients report pain while taking adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) for the treatment of breast cancer. While studies have examined patients' experiences with side effects, none solely capture patients' experiences with AET-related pain, a troubling symptom that reduces quality of life and impairs treatment adherence. This study explored themes of AET-related pain to inform future intervention development.

METHODS

Between November 2017 and November 2018, female patients (n = 30) with early-stage breast cancer enrolled between 3 and 36 months post-initiation of AET. Purposeful sampling was stratified by adherence level, age, distress level and time taking AET. Study staff conducted, transcribed and coded semi-structured interviews via inductive thematic coding to identify pain-related themes and achieved high inter-coded reliability (Kappa = 0.96).

RESULTS

Several pain-related themes were observed. Attitudes around pain are generally negative, and management needs are largely unmet. Patients reported preferences for non-pharmacological management strategies and cited AET pain as a reason for medication breaks but not discontinuation. Patients within 19 months of starting AET and low adherers reported more intense and disruptive pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' experiences varied by patient attributes and revealed modifiable factors that may be targeted through behavioural interventions. AET-related pain is a complex side effect for which psychosocial support may be beneficial.

Factors associated with worsening sexual function during adjuvant endocrine therapy in a prospective clinic-based cohort of women with early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

Sexual function problems are common but under-reported among women receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Worsening scores on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may identify those at risk for sexual function problems during treatment. We performed a secondary analysis of prospectively collected PROs in women receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy to identify factors associated with worsening sexual function.

METHODS

Women with stage 0-III breast cancer initiating adjuvant endocrine therapy participating in a prospective cohort completed PROs at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Sexual function was evaluated by the MOS-SP measure. Other measures included PROMIS pain interference, fatigue, depression, anxiety, physical function, and sleep disturbance and the Endocrine Symptom Subscale of the FACT-ES. We evaluated associations between score worsening of at least the minimal important difference (MID) in PROMIS T-scores (4 points) and FACT-ES scores (5 points) with score worsening of at least the MID in MOS-SP scores (8 points) using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 300 participants, 45.7% experienced ≥ 8-point worsening of MOS-SP score at any time point compared to baseline. Worsening endocrine symptoms (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.22-1.49, p < 0.001), worsening physical function (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.18, p = 0.06), and prior mastectomy (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.94-2.23, p = 0.09) were associated with MOS-SP score worsening by at least the MID.

CONCLUSION

Worsening endocrine symptoms and physical function identified on PROs are associated with worsening sexual function during adjuvant endocrine therapy. Routine assessment of these domains with PROs may identify women at risk for sexual function problems.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01937052; Date of Registration: 09/09/2013.

Association of treatment-emergent symptoms identified by patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant endocrine therapy discontinuation

Many patients discontinue endocrine therapy for breast cancer due to intolerance. Identification of patients at risk for discontinuation is challenging. The minimal important difference (MID) is the smallest change in a score on a patient-reported outcome (PRO) that is clinically significant. We evaluated the association between treatment-emergent symptoms detected by worsening PRO scores in units equal to the MID with discontinuation. We enrolled females with stage 0-III breast cancer initiating endocrine therapy in a prospective cohort. Participants completed PROs at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Measures included PROMIS pain interference, fatigue, depression, anxiety, physical function, and sleep disturbance; Endocrine Subscale of the FACT-ES; and MOS-Sexual Problems (MOS-SP). We evaluated associations between continuous PRO scores in units corresponding to MIDs (PROMIS: 4-points; FACT-ES: 5-points; MOS-SP: 8-points) with time to endocrine therapy discontinuation using Cox proportional hazards models. Among 321 participants, 140 (43.6%) initiated tamoxifen and 181 (56.4%) initiated aromatase inhibitor (AI). The cumulative probability of discontinuation was 23% (95% CI 18-27%) at 48 months. For every 5- and 4-point worsening in endocrine symptoms and sleep disturbance respectively, participants were 13 and 14% more likely to discontinue endocrine therapy respectively (endocrine symptoms HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.25, p = 0.02; sleep disturbance HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01-1.29, p = 0.03). AI treatment was associated with greater likelihood of discontinuation than tamoxifen. Treatment-emergent endocrine symptoms and sleep disturbance are associated with endocrine therapy discontinuation. Monitoring for worsening scores meeting or exceeding the MID on PROs may identify patients at risk for discontinuation.

Sexual quality of life assessment in young women with breast cancer during adjuvant endocrine therapy and patient-reported supportive measures

PURPOSE

Sexual quality of life (QoL) is affected during and after breast cancer (BC) treatment. The purpose was to investigate sexual and global QoL and patient-reported measures to address this issue in young women (< 51 years) with BC after the acute treatment phase, during adjuvant endocrine therapy.

METHODS

Three EORTC questionnaires and an additional specific questionnaire, developed for the study, were used to assess sexual and global QoL and patient-reported supportive measures in BC patients who had received their endocrine therapy for at least 24 months. Among the 54 eligible patients, 45 (83%) agreed to participate in the study.

RESULTS

We showed a deterioration in sexual QoL and poor communication with healthcare professionals. Most patients (88.9%) declared that it was important that sexuality should be discussed with caregivers and that the partner should also be involved. Most patients (60%) had taken at least one action to overcome their sexual problems. Most of these interventions (63%) originated from the patient herself.

CONCLUSIONS

Sexual QoL is a major issue in young BC patients and is poorly addressed by healthcare professionals. Most of the supportive methods used by the patients to overcome these side effects were on their own initiative. Communication and counseling on sexuality by healthcare professionals need to be improved during BC treatment. Patients suggested supportive measures they would find useful and appropriate to develop in the clinic. The final goal is to improve the sexual QoL of BC patients with the appropriate intervention and support.

Gynecologic Symptoms among Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients on Oral Endocrine Therapy: A Cross-Sectional Study

Endocrine therapy (ET) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer can contribute to gynecologic symptoms (GS) that impact vaginal health, sexual function, and quality of life (QoL). A cross-sectional study was conducted at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, Canada between July 2017 and June 2018 to examine the occurrence and frequency of GS among HR+ breast cancer patients on ET, patient-provider communication, female sexual dysfunction (FSD), and QoL. A Treatment Experience questionnaire was developed for this study and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire (MENQOL) were also administered. Of 151 patients surveyed, 77 (51.0%) were on tamoxifen and 74 (49.0%) on an aromatase inhibitor. Most patients (84.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 77.3% to 89.5%) experienced at least one GS “all the time” or “often”, or one or more infections, in the past year. Only 44 (31.9%) patients reported that their oncologist had ever previously asked them about experiencing GS. The prevalence of FSD was 61.2% (95% CI 46.2% to 74.8%) among 49 sexually active patients that completed the FSFI. Symptoms captured in the MENQOL’s vasomotor domain were deemed most bothersome. Side effect management and patient-provider communication should be prioritized to optimize GS, vaginal health, and sexual function of ET users.

Major depressive symptoms in breast cancer patients with ovarian function suppression: a cross-sectional study comparing ovarian ablation and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists

BACKGROUND

Ovarian function suppression (OFS) is indicated in premenopausal women with early or metastasis breast cancer, which may be achieved with similar effect by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) or ovarian ablation (OA). We examined whether there were differences in major depressive symptoms outcomes and its associated factors between gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) and ovarian ablation (OA) in premenopausal breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Premenopausal breast cancer patients from seven hospitals who received OFS participated in the study between June 2019 and June 2020. The correlated variable was the type of ovarian suppression, categorized as either OA (n = 174) or GnRHa (n = 389). Major depressive symptoms was evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire was used to assess sexual function.

RESULTS

A total of 563 patients completed the surveys. The mean PHQ-9 sum score was slightly lower in the GnRHa cohort than in the OA cohort (11.4 ± 5.7 vs. 12.8 ± 5.8, P = 0.079). There were significantly fewer patients with major depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 15) in the GnRHa cohort (31.1% vs. 40.2%, Exp (B)=1.805, P=0.004). Further, breast-conserving surgery and sexual dysfunction were negatively correlated with major depressive symptoms [mastectomy vs. breast-conserving: Exp (B) = 0.461, P <0.001;[sexual dysfunction vs. normal: Exp (B) = 0.512, P = 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate that GnRHa results in more favorable depressive symptoms outcomes than OA. Moreover, most patients preferred alternatives to their OFS treatment. These findings can contribute to improving and alleviating the adverse effects of OFS.

Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021

The 17th St Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference in 2021 was held virtually, owing to the global COVID-19 pandemic. More than 3300 participants took part in this important bi-annual critical review of the 'state of the art' in the multidisciplinary care of early-stage breast cancer. Seventy-four expert panelists (see Appendix 1) from all continents discussed and commented on the previously elaborated consensus questions, as well as many key questions on early breast cancer diagnosis and treatment asked by the audience. The theme of this year's conference was 'Customizing local and systemic therapies.' A well-organized program of pre-recorded symposia, live panel discussions and real-time panel voting results drew a worldwide audience of thousands, reflecting the far-reaching impact of breast cancer on every continent. The interactive technology platform allowed, for the first time, audience members to ask direct questions to panelists, and to weigh in with their own vote on several key panel questions. A hallmark of this meeting was to focus on customized recommendations for treatment of early-stage breast cancer. There is increasing recognition that the care of a breast cancer patient depends on highly individualized clinical features, including the stage at presentation, the biological subset of breast cancer, the genetic factors that may underlie breast cancer risk, the genomic signatures that inform treatment recommendations, the extent of response before surgery in patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy, and patient preferences. This customized approach to treatment requires integration of clinical care between patients and radiology, pathology, genetics, and surgical, medical and radiation oncology providers. It also requires a dynamic response from clinicians as they encounter accumulating clinical information at the time of diagnosis and then serially with each step in the treatment plan and follow-up, reflecting patient experiences and treatment response.

Prospective evaluation of sexual health in breast cancer women during the first year of adjuvant hormonal treatment using a cancer patient's dedicated questionnaire: A glaring gap of communication between health professionals and patients

PURPOSE

Sexual quality of life (QoL) is affected during and after breast cancer (BC) treatment and is not specifically evaluated with the general health-related quality-of-life questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 or QLQ-BR23. A specific questionnaire, the EORTC SHQ-C22, including physical, psychological, and social aspects of sexuality, was recently developed to address this issue in cancer patients.

METHODS

A prospective bicentric study was conducted to evaluate the sexual QoL of women with BC during the first year of adjuvant hormonal treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 106 women completed the 3 questionnaires at baseline and 92 of them, at 12 months. At baseline, we showed low sexual satisfaction and importance given to sexual activity and a very low communication with healthcare professionals about this issue. Twelve months later, the importance given to sexuality had increased. While the communication with professionals had improved, it remained at a very low level. We were unable to identify specific clinical factors (chemotherapy, menopausal status, type of surgery or radiotherapy) that would negatively affect the global sexual well-being in BC patients.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of sexual QoL of BC patients during the first year of hormonal treatment with a recently developed, cancer-dedicated, standardized tool pointed out the need for deeper communication between professionals and patients regarding sexual issues to fill the current gap in care of cancer patients and help patients with adequate intervention and support.

The affect of goserelin on the QoL of women having chemotherapy for EBC: Results from the OPTION trial

Background

The OPTION trial results showed that premenopausal women with early stage breast cancer (EBC) receiving chemotherapy benefited from ovarian function protection with goserelin. The impact of treatments on patient reported Quality of Life (QoL) were also examined.

Patients and methods

227 pre-menopausal women with EBC, were randomly assigned to chemotherapy±goserelin (C±G); 132 (58%) were ER-ve. Patients were stratified by age (≤40 years and >40 years). QoL was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast, and Endocrine Symptom checklist at baseline (pre-treatment), 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, then annually to 5 years. Treatment Outcome Index (TOI) score was the primary outcome.

Results

213 patients were available for QoL analysis. There was a significant decrease in TOI scores for both treatment groups at 3 and 6 months that returned to pre-treatment levels at 12 months, then continued to increase reflecting improved QoL. By 3 months there was a significant difference from baseline in both groups for menopausal symptoms, and between groups in the proportion experiencing hot flushes at any time. The C + G group experienced higher levels of vasomotor symptoms generally during the treatment phase; by 24 months, the short-term negative effect of goserelin was reversed, with hot flushes twice as frequent in the chemotherapy only group (40.9% vs 21.3%).

Conclusions

These results show that young women diagnosed with breast cancer experienced only a short-term decrease in QoL from the addition of goserelin, in order to preserve ovarian function during chemotherapy treatment.

•

Ovarian damage from breast cancer chemotherapy is a concern for the younger patient.

•

OPTION showed goserelin reduced the rate of premature ovarian insufficiency in the ≤40yrs.

•

Patient reported QoL is an important consideration in evaluating these treatments.

•

OPTION QoL revealed greater vasomotor symptoms with goserelin at 3 and 6 mths.

•

Overall goserelin treatment resulted in only a short term decrease in QoL.