1
|
Boland MR. Modern management of the axilla. J Surg Oncol 2024; 130:23-28. [PMID: 38643485 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
Surgical management of the axilla has evolved considerably in recent years, with a strong focus on de-escalation to minimise morbidity whilst maintaining oncological outcomes. Current trials will focus on the omission of Sentinel node biopsy in select groups of patients, while axillary lymph node dissection will be reserved for those with more aggressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Boland
- Department of Breast Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li Y, Han D, Shen C. Prediction of the axillary lymph-node metastatic burden of breast cancer by 18F-FDG PET/CT-based radiomics. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:704. [PMID: 38849770 PMCID: PMC11161959 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12476-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The axillary lymph-node metastatic burden is closely associated with treatment decisions and prognosis in breast cancer patients. This study aimed to explore the value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics in combination with ultrasound and clinical pathological features for predicting axillary lymph-node metastatic burden in breast cancer. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted and involved 124 patients with pathologically confirmed early-stage breast cancer who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT examination. The ultrasound, PET/CT, and clinical pathological features of all patients were analysed, and radiomic features from PET images were extracted to establish a multi-parameter predictive model. RESULTS The ultrasound lymph-node positivity rate and PET lymph-node positivity rate in the high nodal burden group were significantly higher than those in the low nodal burden group (χ2 = 19.867, p < 0.001; χ2 = 33.025, p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in the PET-based radiomics score (RS) for predicting axillary lymph-node burden between the high and low lymph-node burden groups. (-1.04 ± 0.41 vs. -1.47 ± 0.41, t = -4.775, p < 0.001). The ultrasound lymph-node positivity (US_LNM) (odds ratio [OR] = 3.264, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.022-10.423), PET lymph-node positivity (PET_LNM) (OR = 14.242, 95% CI = 2.960-68.524), and RS (OR = 5.244, 95% CI = 3.16-20.896) are all independent factors associated with high lymph-node burden (p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the multi-parameter (MultiP) model was 0.895, which was superior to those of US_LNM, PET_LNM, and RS models (AUC = 0.703, 0.814, 0.773, respectively), with statistically significant differences (Z = 2.888, 3.208, 3.804, respectively; p = 0.004, 0.002, < 0.001, respectively). Decision curve analysis indicated that the MultiP model provided a higher net benefit for all patients. CONCLUSION A MultiP model based on PET-based radiomics was able to effectively predict axillary lymph-node metastatic burden in breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT05826197) on May 7, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Li
- PET/CT Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an Shaanxi, Shaanxi, 710061, China.
| | - Dong Han
- PET/CT Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an Shaanxi, Shaanxi, 710061, China
| | - Cong Shen
- PET/CT Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an Shaanxi, Shaanxi, 710061, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Williams AD, Weiss A. Recent Advances in the Upfront Surgical Management of the Axilla in Patients with Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24:271-277. [PMID: 38220539 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Nodal status is an important prognostic indicator. Upfront axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer has historically been both diagnostic and therapeutic-serving to determine nodal status and inform adjuvant therapies, and to remove clinically significant disease. However, trials of de-escalation or omission of axillary surgery altogether consistently demonstrate noninferior oncologic outcomes in a wide variety of patient subsets. These strategies also reduce the morbidity associated with either sentinel lymphadenectomy or axillary lymph node dissection. Here we will briefly review landmark trials that have shaped upfront axillary surgery as well as recent advances, and discuss areas of ongoing investigation and future needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin D Williams
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Anna Weiss
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Weber WP, Davide Gentilini O, Morrow M, Montagna G, de Boniface J, Fitzal F, Wyld L, Rubio IT, Matrai Z, King TA, Saccilotto R, Galimberti V, Maggi N, Andreozzi M, Sacchini V, Castrezana López L, Loesch J, Schwab FD, Eller R, Heidinger M, Haug M, Kurzeder C, Di Micco R, Banys-Paluchowski M, Ditsch N, Harder Y, Paulinelli RR, Urban C, Benson J, Bjelic-Radisic V, Potter S, Knauer M, Thill M, Vrancken Peeters MJ, Kuemmel S, Heil J, Gulluoglu BM, Tausch C, Ganz-Blaettler U, Shaw J, Dubsky P, Poortmans P, Kaidar-Person O, Kühn T, Gnant M. Uncertainties and controversies in axillary management of patients with breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 117:102556. [PMID: 37126938 PMCID: PMC10752145 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
The aims of this Oncoplastic Breast Consortium and European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists initiative were to identify uncertainties and controversies in axillary management of early breast cancer and to recommend appropriate strategies to address them. By use of Delphi methods, 15 questions were prioritized by more than 250 breast surgeons, patient advocates and radiation oncologists from 60 countries. Subsequently, a global virtual consensus panel considered available data, ongoing studies and resource utilization. It agreed that research should no longer be prioritized for standardization of axillary imaging, de-escalation of axillary surgery in node-positive cancer and risk evaluation of modern surgery and radiotherapy. Instead, expert consensus recommendations for clinical practice should be based on current evidence and updated once results from ongoing studies become available. Research on de-escalation of radiotherapy and identification of the most relevant endpoints in axillary management should encompass a meta-analysis to identify knowledge gaps, followed by a Delphi process to prioritize and a consensus conference to refine recommendations for specific trial designs. Finally, treatment of residual nodal disease after surgery was recommended to be assessed in a prospective register.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter P Weber
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | | | - Monica Morrow
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Giacomo Montagna
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Breast Unit, Capio St Göran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Florian Fitzal
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Visceral Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Austria; Austrian Breast and Colorectal Study Group ABCSG, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lynda Wyld
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Isabel T Rubio
- Breast Surgical Oncology Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Zoltan Matrai
- Hamad Medical Corporation, Dept of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Doha, Qatar
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana Farber/Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ramon Saccilotto
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Nadia Maggi
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mariacarla Andreozzi
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Virgilio Sacchini
- Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Julie Loesch
- Gynecology Department, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabienne D Schwab
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ruth Eller
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martin Heidinger
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martin Haug
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian Kurzeder
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rosa Di Micco
- Breast Surgery, San Raffaele University and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Yves Harder
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università Della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Régis R Paulinelli
- Federal University of Goias, Goias, Brazil; Breast Unit, Araújo Jorge Hospital, Goias, Brazil
| | - Cicero Urban
- Breast Unit, Hospital Nossa Senhora Das Graças, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - John Benson
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TRUST, School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
- Breast Unit, University Hospital Helios Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Michael Knauer
- Tumor and Breast Center Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Marc Thill
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Breast Unit, Hospital Essen-Mitte, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joerg Heil
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Medical School, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jane Shaw
- Patient Advocacy Group, Oncoplastic Breast Consortium, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Peter Dubsky
- University of Lucerne, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Lucerne, Switzerland; Breast Centre, Hirslanden Clinic St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Netwerk and University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy Unit, at Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Dept. Radiation Oncologv (Maastro), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
| | - Michael Gnant
- Austrian Breast and Colorectal Study Group ABCSG, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Laws A, Kantor O, King TA. Surgical Management of the Axilla for Breast Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:51-77. [PMID: 36435614 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
This review discusses the contemporary surgical management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Surgical paradigms are highlighted by clinical nodal status at presentation and treatment approach, including upfront surgery and neoadjuvant systemic therapy settings. This review focuses on the increasing opportunities for de-escalating the extent of axillary surgery in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy, while also reviewing the remaining indications for axillary clearance with axillary lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Laws
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Olga Kantor
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cocco D, Shah C, Wei W, Wilkerson A, Grobmyer SR, Al-Hilli Z. Axillary lymph node dissection can be omitted in patients with limited clinically node-positive breast cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1293-1299. [PMID: 36066266 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND De-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer has progressively taken place when appropriate. Data supporting surgical de-escalation in patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) disease remains scarce. Here, survival among patients with cN+ T1-2 tumours undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) was investigated and compared with that among patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with or without RNI. METHODS The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify three groups of patients with cN+ tumours according to axillary management among those treated between 2010 and 2016: patients who underwent SLNB and RNI (cN+ SLNB/RNI group); those who had ALND and RNI (cN+ ALND/RNI group); and those who had ALND alone (cN+ ALND/no RNI group). Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and those who had stage IV breast cancer or pN2-3 disease were excluded. RESULTS A total of 12 560 patients met the inclusion criteria: 3030 in the cN+ SLNB/RNI, 5446 in the cN+ ALND/RNI, and 4084 in the cN+ ALND/no RNI group. The sizes of cN + SLNB/RNI and cN+ ALND/RNI groups increased over the study interval, whereas the cN+ ALND/no RNI group decreased in size (P < 0.001). There was a median of one positive node in the cN+ SLNB/RNI group and two nodes in the cN+ ALND/RNI and cN+ ALND/no RNI groups. The median number of nodes examined was three, 14, and 14, respectively (P < 0.001). Median follow-up was 57.9 (range 0.8-114) months. The overall survival rate was 97, 97, and 92 per cent respectively at two years, and 88, 86, and 78 per cent at five years (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients with limited cN+ T1-2 breast cancer undergoing upfront SLNB and RNI have favourable survival outcomes that are not inferior to those of patients undergoing ALND with or without RNI. Prospective studies are warranted to assess locoregional control and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Cocco
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Wei Wei
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Avia Wilkerson
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Stephen R Grobmyer
- Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Zahraa Al-Hilli
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Freitas-Junior R, de Oliveira VM, Frasson AL, Cavalcante FP, Mansani FP, Mattar A, Zerwes FP, de Oliveira Freitas AM, de Souza ABA, Damin AP, dos Santos AMR, Ruiz CA, de Lucena CÊM, Millen EC, Bagnoli F, Andrade F, Rodrigues FLB, Facina G, Novita G, Pedrini JL, Guará JP, Soares LR, de Nigro Corpa MV, Passos M, de Lucena Ferreira NCF, Freitas NMA, Machado RHS, da Cunha Amaral RK, Reinert T, Budel VM. Management of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: recommendations of a panel of experts from the Brazilian Society of Mastology. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1201. [PMID: 36419031 PMCID: PMC9682792 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10250-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogenous subtype involving different patterns of behavior and clinical course, demanding a complex, individualized sequence of treatment. The knowledge and attitudes of the affiliated members of the Brazilian Society of Mastology regarding TNBC were evaluated and a consensus regarding management and treatment was reached. METHODS Affiliates completed a survey involving 44 objective questions. In addition, a specialist meeting was held with 27 experts and 3 ad hoc consultants. The panelists completed the survey before and after brainstorming. Answers achieving 70% of agreement were considered consensual. The chi-square test was used to compare answers between panelists and affiliates and the Kappa coefficient to calculate agreement. RESULTS Consensus among the panelists increased from 26 (59.1%) to 32 questions (72.7%) following brainstorming (p = 0.17), including 7/10 questions on systemic treatment. Among the affiliates, consensus was achieved for 24 questions (54.5%), resulting in moderate agreement (κ = 0.445). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be indicated for almost all cases (except cT1a-b N0) and should include platinum agents. When indicated, immunotherapy is part of the standard of care. The panel reaffirmed the concept of no ink on tumor as indicative of adequate margins and the possibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy for cN1 patients who become cN0 following neoadjuvant therapy. Controversies remain on combining immunotherapy with capecitabine/olaparib in pertinent cases. CONCLUSION Expert consensus was achieved for > 70% of the questions, with moderate agreement between panelists and affiliates. Educational interventions on systemic breast cancer treatment affected decision-making in 60% of the questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruffo Freitas-Junior
- grid.411195.90000 0001 2192 5801Advanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), Federal University of Goiás and the Araújo Jorge Hospital, Goiás Association for the Combat of Cancer, 1ª Avenida, s/n, Setor Universitário, Goiânia, GO 74605-050 Brazil
| | - Vilmar Marques de Oliveira
- grid.419432.90000 0000 8872 5006School of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | - Antonio Luiz Frasson
- grid.413562.70000 0001 0385 1941Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil and the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | | | - Fabio Postiglione Mansani
- grid.412323.50000 0001 2218 3838Department of Medicine, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR Brazil
| | - André Mattar
- grid.459930.2Reference Center in Women’s Health Care, Pérola Byington Hospital, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | - Felipe Pereira Zerwes
- grid.412519.a0000 0001 2166 9094Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS Brazil
| | | | | | - Andrea P. Damin
- grid.8532.c0000 0001 2200 7498Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS Brazil
| | | | - Carlos Alberto Ruiz
- grid.11899.380000 0004 1937 0722Teaching Hospital, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | | | | | - Fábio Bagnoli
- grid.419432.90000 0000 8872 5006School of Medical Sciences, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo and the Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | - Felipe Andrade
- grid.413471.40000 0000 9080 8521Department of Breast Surgery, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | | | - Gil Facina
- grid.411249.b0000 0001 0514 7202Department of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | - Guilherme Novita
- grid.413562.70000 0001 0385 1941Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP Brazil
| | | | - José Pereira Guará
- grid.411204.20000 0001 2165 7632Teaching Hospital of the Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís, MA Brazil
| | - Leonardo Ribeiro Soares
- grid.411195.90000 0001 2192 5801Advanced Center for Breast Diagnosis (CORA), Federal University of Goiás and the Dona Iris Women’s and Maternity Hospital, Goiânia, GO Brazil
| | | | - Mauro Passos
- grid.414433.5Hospital de Base, Federal District, Brasília, DF Brazil
| | | | - Nilceana Maya Aires Freitas
- Radiotherapy Unit, Araújo Jorge Cancer Hospital, Goiás Association for the Combat of Cancer, and Brazilian Center for Radiotherapy, Oncology and Mastology (CEBROM), Goiânia, GO Brazil
| | | | | | - Tomás Reinert
- Oncoclínicas Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre (RS) and the Serra Gaúcha Research Center, Caxias do Sul, RS Brazil
| | - Vinicius Milani Budel
- grid.20736.300000 0001 1941 472XTeaching Hospital of the Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Man V, Luk WP, Fung LH, Kwong A. The role of pre-operative axillary ultrasound in assessment of axillary tumor burden in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 196:245-254. [PMID: 36138294 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06699-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies have suggested that a significant proportion of patients with axillary nodal metastases diagnosed by pre-operative axillary ultrasound (AUS)-guided needle biopsy were over-treated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The role of routine AUS and needle biopsy in early breast cancer was questioned. This review aims to determine if pre-operative AUS could predict the extent of axillary tumor burden and need of ALND. METHODS PubMed and Embase literature databases were searched systematically for abnormal AUS characteristics and axillary nodal burden. Studies were eligible if they correlated the sonographic abnormalities in AUS with the resultant axillary nodal burden in ALND according to the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria. RESULTS Eleven retrospective studies and one prospective study with 1658 patients were included. Sixty-five percent of patients with one abnormal lymph node in AUS and 56% of those with two had low axillary nodal burden. Using one abnormal lymph node as the cut-off, the pooled sensitivity and specificity in prediction of axillary nodal burden were 66% (95%CI 63-69%) and 73% (95% CI 70-76%), respectively. Across the six studies that evaluated suspicious nodal characteristics, increased nodal cortical thickness may be associated with high axillary nodal burden. CONCLUSION More than half of the patients with pre-operative positive AUS and biopsy proven axillary nodal metastases were over-treated by ALND. Quantification of suspicious nodes and extent of cortical morphological changes in AUS may help identify suitable patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Man
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, K1401, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Wing-Pan Luk
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Ling-Hiu Fung
- Medical Physics and Research Department, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR
| | - Ava Kwong
- Chief of Breast Surgery Division, Department of Surgery,, Daniel CK Yu Professor in Breast Cancer Research, The University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, K1401, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rates of pathologic nodal disease among cN0 and cN1 patients undergoing routine axillary ultrasound and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 195:181-189. [PMID: 35900704 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06677-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Routine axillary ultrasound (AxUS) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains controversial. Here, we report rates of AxUS-detected nodal disease among patients with normal clinical exams, and rates of pathologic nodal disease after NAC based on method of nodal disease detection. METHODS Clinicopathologic findings were prospectively collected for stage I-III breast cancer patients selected for NAC. All patients had pre-treatment AxUS, suspicious nodes were biopsied. The following four patient cohorts were examined: patients with suspicious exam or AxUS but negative biopsy (Suspicious cN0); those with normal exam and normal AxUS (Not Suspicious cN0); those with normal exam but suspicious AxUS and positive biopsy (AxUS-detected cN1); and those with abnormal exam and positive biopsy (exam-detected cN1). Sentinel (SLN) and non-sentinel lymph nodes (non-SLN) were evaluated by immunohistochemistry; nodal metastases of any size were considered positive. RESULTS 500 patients were included. Of 310 patients with normal axillary exams, 160 had suspicious AxUS, 65 were biopsy-negative (Suspicious cN0) and 95/310 (30.6%) were biopsy-positive (AxUS-detected cN1). Of 190 with abnormal axillary exams, 166 were biopsy-proven node-positive (exam-detected cN1) and 24 were AxUS or biopsy-negative (Suspicious cN0). Rates of pathologic nodal disease were 20/150 (13.3%) among Not Suspicious cN0 patients, 12/89 (13.5%) among Suspicious cN0 (p = 0.97). Rates of residual nodal disease were 55/95 (57.9%) among AxUS-detected cN1 patients, 102/166 (61.4%) among exam-detected cN1 (p = 0.57). CONCLUSION AxUS detected nodal disease in 30.6% of patients with normal clinical exams selected for NAC. Rates of pathologic nodal disease were similar among AxUS-detected and exam-detected cN1 patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Vasigh M, Meshkati Yazd SM, Karoobi M, Hajebi R, Yazdankhah Kenari A. Does ultrasound evaluation of the axilla increase the rate of axillary lymph node dissection in early stage clinically node negative breast cancer patients? BMC Surg 2022; 22:80. [PMID: 35241059 PMCID: PMC8895764 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01530-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Management and axillary staging of breast cancer has become less invasive and more conservative, over the decades. Considering Z011, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided in T1-2 N0-1 breast cancers with one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), if they are candidates for breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to recognize if pre-operative axillary US evaluation in early-stage breast cancer could lead to more ALND in post Z011 era. Method 463 breast cancer patients were evaluated. 368 early-stage breast cancer patients (T1-2 N0) were included. We did not perform axillary US in early stage clinically node negative patients; however, 97 patients had axillary US prior to our visit. If axillary US could detect more than two suspicious LNs, US guided biopsy was performed. The remaining clinically node negative patients underwent upfront SLNB. ALND was performed if more than two SLNs were metastatic, or US-guided ALN biopsy proved metastatic involvement. Results 97 patients had axillary US evaluation before the surgery. 67 patients (69.2%) did not have any suspicious US detected axillary LNs, 17 patients (17.5%) had one, 7 patients (7.2%) had two, and 6 patients (6.2%) had more than two suspicious LNs according to their axillary US evaluation. Those with more than two suspicious LNs underwent ALN US-guided biopsy. Metastatic involvement of the LNs was proved in all of them and they underwent upfront ALND. ALND revealed more than 2 metastatic LNs in 2/6 patients (33.3%). 91 patients who were evaluated by axillary US, had less than two US detected suspicious LNs and underwent SLNB. Amongst 24 patients with one or two US detected suspicious LNs, 1/24 patient had more than two positive SLNs and underwent ALND. In this group 15.6% underwent ALND and 5.2% of them were unnecessary according to the recent guidelines. Axillary US had a false positive rate of 36.6%. The sensitivity of axillary US in distinguishing patients with more than two suspicious LNs in clinically node negative patients was 25%. In the second group (without pre-operative axillary US evaluation), SLNB was performed. 204/272 patients (75%) did not have LN metastasis. 54/272 patients (19.9%) had one or two metastatic SLNs and according to Z011, ALND was omitted. 5.1% had more than two metastatic SLNs and underwent ALND. Conclusion US evaluation of the axilla in early stage, clinically node negative breast cancer patients, is not sensitive enough to recognize more than two metastatic ALNs. It leads to more unnecessary ALND. Despite the small number of patients in this study, these results question the rationale of axillary US guided biopsy in low burden (less than two) suspicious LNs. looking for an imaging modality with a higher sensitivity in detecting the Burdon of axillary metastatic involvement is mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahtab Vasigh
- Department of General Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 14176-13151, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Mostafa Meshkati Yazd
- Department of General Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 14176-13151, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Karoobi
- Department of General Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 14176-13151, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Hajebi
- Department of General Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 14176-13151, Tehran, Iran
| | - Adel Yazdankhah Kenari
- Department of General Surgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 14176-13151, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Weber WP, Matrai Z, Hayoz S, Tausch C, Henke G, Zwahlen DR, Gruber G, Zimmermann F, Seiler S, Maddox C, Ruhstaller T, Muenst S, Ackerknecht M, Kuemmel S, Bjelic-Radisic V, Kurzeder C, Újhelyi M, Vrieling C, Satler R, Meyer I, Becciolini C, Bucher S, Simonson C, Fehr PM, Gabriel N, Maráz R, Sarlos D, Dedes KJ, Leo C, Berclaz G, Dubsky P, Exner R, Fansa H, Hager C, Reisenberger K, Singer CF, Reitsamer R, Reinisch M, Winkler J, Lam GT, Fehr MK, Naydina T, Kohlik M, Clerc K, Ostapenko V, Fitzal F, Nussbaumer R, Maggi N, Schulz A, Markellou P, Lelièvre L, Egle D, Heil J, Knauer M. Tailored axillary surgery in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer: Pre-planned feasibility substudy of TAXIS (OPBC-03, SAKK 23/16, IBCSG 57-18, ABCSG-53, GBG 101). Breast 2021; 60:98-110. [PMID: 34555676 PMCID: PMC8463904 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM We developed tailored axillary surgery (TAS) to reduce the axillary tumor volume in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer to the point where radiotherapy can control it. The aim of this study was to quantify the extent of tumor load reduction achieved by TAS. METHODS International multicenter prospective study embedded in a randomized trial. TAS is a novel pragmatic concept for axillary surgery de-escalation that combines palpation-guided removal of suspicious nodes with the sentinel procedure and, optionally, imaging-guided localization. Pre-specified study endpoints quantified surgical extent and reduction of tumor load. RESULTS A total of 296 patients were included at 28 sites in four European countries, 125 (42.2%) of whom underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and 71 (24.0%) achieved nodal pathologic complete response. Axillary metastases were detectable only by imaging in 145 (49.0%) patients. They were palpable in 151 (51.0%) patients, of whom 63 underwent NACT and 21 had residual palpable disease after NACT. TAS removed the biopsied and clipped node in 279 (94.3%) patients. In 225 patients with nodal disease at the time of surgery, TAS removed a median of five (IQR 3-7) nodes, two (IQR 1-4) of which were positive. Of these 225 patients, 100 underwent ALND after TAS, which removed a median of 14 (IQR 10-17) additional nodes and revealed additional positive nodes in 70/100 (70%) of patients. False-negative rate of TAS in patients who underwent subsequent ALND was 2.6%. CONCLUSIONS TAS selectively reduced the tumor load in the axilla and remained much less radical than ALND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter P Weber
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Zoltan Matrai
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary; University of Szeged, H-6725 Szeged, Hungary
| | | | | | - Guido Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Breast Center, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Daniel R Zwahlen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Günther Gruber
- Institute of Radiotherapy, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Frank Zimmermann
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Simone Muenst
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Markus Ackerknecht
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Christian Kurzeder
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mihály Újhelyi
- Department of Breast and Sarcoma Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Conny Vrieling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hirslanden Clinique des Grangettes, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rok Satler
- Breast Center, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Inna Meyer
- Breast Center, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Charles Becciolini
- Breast Center, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland
| | - Susanne Bucher
- Breast Center, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Colin Simonson
- Department of Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier du Haut-Valais (SZO), Sion, Switzerland
| | - Peter M Fehr
- Breast Center Graubünden, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | | | - Robert Maráz
- Department of Oncology, Bacs-Kiskun Country Hospital, Kecskemet, Hungary
| | - Dimitri Sarlos
- Breast Center, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Konstantin J Dedes
- Breast Cancer Center, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Leo
- Breast Center, Cantonal Hospital Baden, Baden, Switzerland
| | | | - Peter Dubsky
- Breast Center, Hirslanden Klinik St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ruth Exner
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hisham Fansa
- Breast Center Zürich, Bethanien & Spital Zollikerberg, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christopher Hager
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, City Hospital, Dornbirn, Austria
| | - Klaus Reisenberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
| | - Christian F Singer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roland Reitsamer
- Breast Center, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Jelena Winkler
- Breast Center, Basel Bethesda Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Giang Thanh Lam
- Breast Center, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Karine Clerc
- Brustzentrum Freiburg, Centre du sein Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | | | - Florian Fitzal
- Department of Surgery and Breast Health Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rahel Nussbaumer
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Nadia Maggi
- Breast Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra Schulz
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Pagona Markellou
- Breast Center, St. Gallen Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Daniel Egle
- Breast Cancer Center Tirol, Department of Gynecology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jörg Heil
- Breast Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Knauer
- Breast Center Eastern Switzerland, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Applicability of sentinel lymph node oriented treatment strategy for gallbladder cancer. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0247079. [PMID: 33577620 PMCID: PMC7880492 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Utility of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in some malignancies has been reported, however, research on that of gallbladder cancer (GBC) is rare. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the concept of SLN is applicable to T2/3 GBC. METHODS A total of 80 patients who underwent resection for gallbladder cancer were enrolled in this study. Patients with GBC were stratified into two groups based on the location of tumor, peritoneal-side (T2p or 3p) and hepatic-side (T2h or 3h) groups. We evaluated the relationship between cystic duct node (CDN) and downstream lymph node (LN) status. CDN was defined as a SLN in this study. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were classified into T2, including T2p (n = 18) and T2h (n = 20), and 42 patients into T3, including T3p (n = 22) andT3h (n = 20). The incidence of LN metastasis was significantly higher in hepatic-side than peritoneal-side in both T2 and T3 (P = 0.036 and 0.009, respectively). In T2, 14 T2p had negative CDN and downstream LN, however, three T2h had negative CDN and positive downstream LNs (defined as a skipped LN metastasis) (P = 0.043). In T3, patients with skipped LN metastasis were significantly higher in T3h (n = 11) than those in T3p (n = 2) (P<0.001). There was no recurrence of the local lymph node. Disease-free survival in the T2p and T3p were significantly better than those in the T2h and T3h (P = 0.005 and 0.025, respectively). CONCLUSION The concept of SLN can be applicable to T2p GBC, where the downstream LNs dissection can be omitted.
Collapse
|