1
|
Oppong BA, Rumano RP, Paskett ED. Expanding the use of patient navigation: health coaching-based navigation as a novel approach to addressing deficits in breast cancer survivorship support. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 205:1-3. [PMID: 38273216 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07213-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Patient navigation (PN) was created to address barriers to screening and workup for cancers. Since its inception it has resulted in improved mammography utilization, diagnostic resolution, and time to breast cancer treatment initiation in medically underserved populations. Because an abundance of evidence has established PN's positive impact, its use has expanded within the breast cancer care continuum, from screening, treatment, and ultimately survivorship. Increasing applications for navigation now also include support in the treatment and survivorship phase. After treatment, populations who struggle with the complex medical systems where oncology care is often delivered, also lack the support resources needed to successfully transition to survivorship. Support in the psychosocial realm is important for these patients as they continue surveillance and adherence to maintenance medications, such as hormonal therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget A Oppong
- The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States.
| | - Ruvarashe P Rumano
- The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
- College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
| | - Electra D Paskett
- The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scott JM, Lee J, Herndon JE, Michalski MG, Lee CP, O’Brien KA, Sasso JP, Yu AF, Rowed KA, Bromberg JF, Traina TA, Gucalp A, Sanford RA, Gajria D, Modi S, Comen EA, D'Andrea G, Blinder VS, Eves ND, Peppercorn JM, Moskowitz CS, Dang CT, Jones LW. Timing of exercise therapy when initiating adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a randomized trial. Eur Heart J 2023; 44:4878-4889. [PMID: 36806405 PMCID: PMC10702461 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The most appropriate timing of exercise therapy to improve cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) among patients initiating chemotherapy is not known. The effects of exercise therapy administered during, following, or during and following chemotherapy were examined in patients with breast cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS Using a parallel-group randomized trial design, 158 inactive women with breast cancer initiating (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were allocated to receive (1:1 ratio): usual care or one of three exercise regimens-concurrent (during chemotherapy only), sequential (after chemotherapy only), or concurrent and sequential (continuous) (n = 39/40 per group). Exercise consisted of treadmill walking three sessions/week, 20-50 min at 55%-100% of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) for ≈16 (concurrent, sequential) or ≈32 (continuous) consecutive weeks. VO2peak was evaluated at baseline (pre-treatment), immediately post-chemotherapy, and ≈16 weeks after chemotherapy. In intention-to-treat analysis, there was no difference in the primary endpoint of VO2peak change between concurrent exercise and usual care during chemotherapy vs. VO2peak change between sequential exercise and usual care after chemotherapy [overall difference, -0.88 mL O2·kg-1·min-1; 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.36, 1.59, P = 0.48]. In secondary analysis, continuous exercise, approximately equal to twice the length of the other regimens, was well-tolerated and the only strategy associated with significant improvements in VO2peak from baseline to post-intervention (1.74 mL O2·kg-1·min-1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION There was no statistical difference in CRF improvement between concurrent vs. sequential exercise therapy relative to usual care in women with primary breast cancer. The promising tolerability and CRF benefit of ≈32 weeks of continuous exercise therapy warrant further evaluation in larger trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Scott
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Jasme Lee
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - James E Herndon
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, 2424 Erwin Road, 8020 Hock Plaza, Durham, NC 27705, USA
| | - Meghan G Michalski
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Catherine P Lee
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Kelly A O’Brien
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - John P Sasso
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, 1147 Research Road, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
| | - Anthony F Yu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Kylie A Rowed
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jacqueline F Bromberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Tiffany A Traina
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Ayca Gucalp
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Rachel A Sanford
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Devika Gajria
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Shanu Modi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Elisabeth A Comen
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Gabriella D'Andrea
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Victoria S Blinder
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Neil D Eves
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, 1147 Research Road, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
| | - Jeffrey M Peppercorn
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Chaya S Moskowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Chau T Dang
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Lee W Jones
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, 418 E 71st St, New York, NY 10021, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oppong BA, Lustberg MB, Nolan TS, Relation T, Park KU, Healy E, Trance A, Klemanski DL. Utilization of cancer survivorship services during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary referral center. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:1708-1714. [PMID: 35895236 PMCID: PMC9326963 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01231-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND All Commission on Cancer-accredited comprehensive cancer centers offer survivorship programs (SPs) to women upon completion of treatment. These SPs can include clinical and non-clinical programming such as physical rehabilitation, emotional and psychosocial support, nutrition, and exercise programming. Concern about the availability and access to these programs during the COVID-19 pandemic has been described in recent literature. We sought to identify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on participation in these supportive services for breast cancer patients within a single institution. METHODS The Ohio State University tertiary care center offers clinical and non-clinical breast cancer support services. Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize referral and patient participation data from January 2019 through July 2021. Data from calendar year 2019 was used as a normative comparison for pre-COVID-19. In-person and telehealth use was tracked longitudinally. RESULTS During the lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic (March through May 2020), provider referrals to SPs declined by 10%, while the overall total for the calendar year modestly increased from 1195 in 2019 to 1210 in 2020, representing a 1.3% increase. Psycho-oncology referrals increased from 280 to 318 (13.5%). The most significant change of participation rates in non-clinical SPs during the pandemic was utilization of exercise content, which increased by 220% from 2019 to 2020. The total proportion of breast cancer participants choosing an exercise program increased from 16.8% in 2019 to 42.2% in 2021, making it the most selected program area overall. Previously, nutrition was the most selected program area as it comprised 42.5% of overall utilization in 2019. CONCLUSION The pandemic's potential to place barriers to participation in SPs is a legitimate concern. We found a modest decline in provider referrals to clinical services during the lockdown period, while patient-directed participation increased with more survivors engaging in exercise-based programs. Transitioning to virtual platforms served to maintain access for patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS As we grapple with the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with cancer deserve increased attention due to the expected stressors associated with the diagnosis. Those in the survivorship stage utilize services for psychosocial support, and the observed increase in utilization of SPs suggests an elevated need for connectivity. To meet this need, telehealth platforms have been expanded to allow for continued participation. It remains to be seen whether this will be sustained post-COVID-19 or whether reduced human contact will create new needs for programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget A Oppong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Maryam B Lustberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timiya S Nolan
- Martha S. Pitzer Center for Women, Children & Youth, College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Theresa Relation
- MetroHealth Systems and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ko Un Park
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Erin Healy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Annie Trance
- Cancer Support Services, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Dori L Klemanski
- Cancer Support Services, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|