Detection of intracardiac masses in patients with coronary artery disease using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with transthoracic echocardiography

[MINOCA-myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries]

BACKGROUND

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) accounts for 5-10% of all presentations of acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES

To outline the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with suspected MINOCA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Current guidelines for the use of CMR in suspected MINOCA are summarized. Clinical cases with typical CMR findings are presented.

RESULTS

In 2019, the American Heart Association published a revised definition of the term MINOCA, which was recently adopted in the European Society of Cardiology 2020 guidelines on acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS). The guidelines indicate that a CMR is recommended (class 1B) in all MINOCA cases with no obvious cause.

CONCLUSION

The major strength of CMR imaging is to differentiate nonischemic from ischemic etiologies of myocardial injury. This makes CMR the most important noninvasive diagnostic tool for the differential diagnosis of patients with suspected MINOCA.

Magnetic-Resonance-Imaging-Based Left Atrial Strain and Left Atrial Strain Rate as Diagnostic Parameters in Cardiac Amyloidosis

Aims: The present study aims to evaluate magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI)-assessed left atrial strain (LAS) and left atrial strain rate (LASR) as potential parameters for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis (CA), the distinction of clinical subtypes and differentiation from other cardiomyopathies. Methods and results: LAS and LASR were assessed by MRI feature tracking in patients with biopsy-proven CA. LAS and LASR of patients with CA were compared to healthy subjects and patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. LAS and LASR were also analyzed concerning differences between patients with transthyretin (ATTR) and light chain amyloidosis (AL). A total of 44 patients with biopsy-proven CA, 19 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 24 healthy subjects were included. In 22 CA patients (50%), histological examination identified ATTR as CA subtype and AL in the remaining patients. No significant difference was observed for reservoir, conduit or booster LAS in patients with AL or ATTR. Reservoir LAS, conduit LAS and booster LAS were significantly reduced in patients with CA and HCM as compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.001). Reservoir LAS and booster LAS were significantly reduced in CA as compared to HCM patients (p < 0.001). A linear correlation was observed between LA global reservoir strain and LA-EF (p < 0.001, r = 0.5), conduit strain and global longitudinal LV strain (p < 0.001, r = 0.5), global booster strain rate and LA-EF (p < 0.001, r = 0.6) and between global booster strain rate and LA area at LVED (p < 0.0001, 0.5). Conclusions: LAS and LASR are severely impaired in patients with CA. The MRI-based assessment of LAS and LASR might allow non-invasive diagnosis and categorization of CA and its distinct differentiation from other hypertrophic phenotypes.

Imaging of left heart intracardiac thrombus: clinical needs, current imaging, and emerging cardiac magnetic resonance techniques

Intracardiac thrombus in the left atrium and atrial appendage (LA/LAA) and left ventricle (LV) increases the risk of systemic thromboembolism and causes potentially devastating diseases such as ischemic stroke and acute ischemia in abdominal organs and lower extremities. Detecting the presence and monitoring the resolution of left heart intracardiac thrombus are of vital importance for stratifying patients and guiding treatment decisions. Currently, echocardiography is the most frequently used method for the above clinical needs, followed by computed tomography. An increasing number of studies have been performed to investigate the value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as an alternative imaging modality given its several unique strengths. This article provides an overview of the clinical relevance of the LA/LAA and LV thrombus as well as the diagnostic performance of the current imaging modalities and emerging CMR techniques.

Cardiovascular MRI Compared to Echocardiography to Identify Cardioaortic Sources of Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: To compare the diagnostic yield of echocardiography and cardiovascular MRI (CMR) to detect structural sources of embolism, in patients with ischemic stroke with a secondary analysis of non-stroke populations.

Methods and Results: We searched MEDLINE/Embase (from 01.01.2000 to 24.04.2021) for studies including CMR to assess prespecified sources of embolism. Comparison included transthoracic and/or transesophageal echocardiography. Two authors independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. Estimates of diagnostic yield were reported and pooled. Twenty-seven studies with 2,525 patients were included in a study-level analysis. Most studies had moderate to high risk of bias. Persistent foramen ovale, complex aortic plaques, left ventricular and left atrial thrombus were the most common pathologies. There was no difference in the yield of left ventricular thrombus detection between both modalities for stroke populations (4 studies), but an increased yield of CMR in non-stroke populations (28.1 vs. 16.0%, P < 0.001, 10 studies). The diagnostic yield in stroke patients for detection of persistent foramen ovale was lower in CMR compared to transoesophageal echocardiography (29.3 vs. 53.7%, P < 0.001, 5 studies). For both echocardiography and CMR the clinical impact of the management consequences derived from many of the diagnostic findings remained undetermined in the identified studies.

Conclusions: Echocardiography and CMR seem to have similar diagnostic yield for most cardioaortic sources of embolism except persistent foramen ovale and left ventricular thrombus. Randomized controlled diagnostic trials are necessary to understand the impact on the management and potential clinical benefits of the assessment of structural cardioaortic stroke sources.

Registration: PROSPERO: CRD42020158787.

Considerations for Reduction of Risk of Perioperative Stroke in Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac and Thoracic Aortic Operations: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Perioperative stroke is one of the most severe and feared complications of cardiac surgery. Based on the timing of onset and detection, perioperative stroke can be classified as intraoperative or postoperative. The pathogenesis of perioperative stroke is multifactorial, which makes prediction and prevention challenging. However, information on its incidence, mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment can be helpful in minimizing the perioperative neurological risk for individual patients. We herein provide suggestions on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strategies aimed at reducing the risk of perioperative stroke and at improving the outcomes of patients who experience a perioperative stroke.

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in the Oncology Patient

Patients with or receiving potentially cardiotoxic treatment for cancer are susceptible to developing decrements in left ventricular mass, diastolic function, or systolic function. They may also experience valvular heart disease, pericardial disease, or intracardiac masses. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance may be used to assess cardiac anatomy, structure, and function and to characterize myocardial tissue. This combination of features facilitates the diagnosis and management of disease processes in patients with or those who have survived cancer. This report outlines and describes prior research involving cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing cardiovascular disease in patients with or previously having received treatment for cancer.

The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in the Management of Patients with Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to detect abnormalities of the cardiovascular system that may result from cancer or its treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

With CMR, one may assess cardiac anatomy, function, myocardial perfusion, tissue composition, and blood flow. For those with cancer, these capabilities allow one to differentiate myocardial masses that may relate to the presence of cancer and evaluate diseases of the pericardium. These features facilitate measurement of left ventricular (LV) volumes, ejection fraction, mass, strain, T1 and T2 relaxation properties, and the extracellular volume fraction all of which may be useful for detecting subclinical cardiovascular injury that results from the receipt of potentially cardiotoxic cancer treatment. CMR can provide an effective and efficient means to identify clinical abnormalities resulting from the diagnosis of cancer or subclinical cardiac injury that may be related to receipt of the therapy for cancer.