Additive prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score and renal function in patients with acute chest pain without known coronary artery disease: up to 5-year follow-up

Coronary calcium scoring as first-line test to detect and exclude coronary artery disease in patients presenting to the general practitioner with stable chest pain: protocol of the cluster-randomised CONCRETE trial

INTRODUCTION

Identifying and excluding coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with atypical angina pectoris (AP) and non-specific thoracic complaints is a challenge for general practitioners (GPs). A diagnostic and prognostic tool could help GPs in determining the likelihood of CAD and guide patient management. Studies in outpatient settings have shown that the CT-based coronary calcium score (CCS) has high accuracy for diagnosis and exclusion of CAD. However, the CT CCS test has not been tested in a primary care setting. In the COroNary Calcium scoring as fiRst-linE Test to dEtect and exclude coronary artery disease in GPs patients with stable chest pain (CONCRETE) study, the impact of direct access of GPs to CT CCS will be investigated. We hypothesise that this will allow for early diagnosis of CAD and treatment, more efficient referral to the cardiologist and a reduction of healthcare-related costs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

CONCRETE is a pragmatic multicentre trial with a cluster randomised design, in which direct GP access to the CT CCS test is compared with standard of care. In both arms, at least 40 GP offices, and circa 800 patients with atypical AP and non-specific thoracic complaints will be included. To determine the increase in detection and treatment rate of CAD in GP offices, the CVRM registration rate is derived from the GPs electronic registration system. Individual patients' data regarding cardiovascular risk factors, expressed chest pain complaints, quality of life, downstream testing and CAD diagnosis will be collected through questionnaires and the electronic GP dossier.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

CONCRETE has been approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the University Medical Center of Groningen.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR 7475; Pre-results.

Carotid plaque thickness is increased in chronic kidney disease and associated with carotid and coronary calcification

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease accelerates both atherosclerosis and arterial calcification. The aim of the present study was to explore whether maximal carotid plaque thickness (cPTmax) was increased in patients with chronic kidney disease compared to controls and associated with cardiovascular disease and severity of calcification in the carotid and coronary arteries.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 200 patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3 from the Copenhagen Chronic Kidney Disease Cohort and 121 age- and sex-matched controls. cPTmax was assessed by ultrasound and arterial calcification by computed tomography scanning.

RESULTS

Carotid plaques were present in 58% of patients (n = 115) compared with 40% of controls (n = 48), p = 0.002. Among participants with plaques, cPTmax (median, interquartile range) was significantly higher in patients compared with controls (1.9 (1.4-2.3) versus 1.5 (1.2-1.8) mm), p = 0.001. Cardiovascular disease was present in 9% of patients without plaques (n = 85), 23% of patients with cPTmax 1.0-1.9 mm (n = 69) and 35% of patients with cPTmax >1.9 mm (n = 46), p = 0.001. Carotid and coronary calcium scores >400 were present in 0% and 4%, respectively, of patients with no carotid plaques, in 19% and 24% of patients with cPTmax 1.0-1.9 mm, and in 48% and 53% of patients with cPTmax >1.9 mm, p<0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study showing that cPTmax is increased in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3 compared to controls and closely associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease and severity of calcification in both the carotid and coronary arteries.

Coronary CT Angiography CAD-RADS versus Coronary Artery Calcium Score in Patients with Acute Chest Pain

Background The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was established in 2016 to standardize the reporting of coronary artery disease at coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Purpose To assess the prognostic value of CAD-RADS at CCTA for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Materials and Methods This multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted at four qualifying university teaching hospitals. Patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain underwent CCTA between January 2010 and December 2017. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for MACEs, including clinical factors, coronary artery calcium score (CACS), and CAD-RADS categories. The prognostic value compared with clinical risk factors and CACS was also assessed. Results A total of 1492 patients were evaluated (mean age, 58 years ± 14 years [standard deviation]; 759 men). During a median follow-up period of 31.5 months, 103 of the 1492 patients (7%) experienced MACEs. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that a moderate to severe CACS was associated with MACEs after adjusting for clinical risk factors (hazard ratio [HR] range, 2.3-4.4; P value range, <.001 to <.01). CAD-RADS categories from 3 to 4 or 5 (HR range, 3.2-8.5; P < .001) and high-risk plaques (HR = 3.6, P < .001) were also associated with MACEs. The C statistics revealed that the CAD-RADS score improved risk stratification more than that using clinical risk factors alone or combined with CACS (C-index, 0.85 vs 0.63 [P < .001] and 0.76 [P < .01], respectively). Conclusion The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System classification had an incremental prognostic value compared with the coronary artery calcium score in the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Vliegenthart in this issue.

The predictive value of coronary artery calcification score combined with bone mineral density for the 2-year risk of cardiovascular events in maintenance hemodialysis patients

PURPOSE

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the predictive value of coronary artery calcification score (CACs) combined with bone mineral density (BMD) for the risk of cardiovascular diseases in MHD patients.

METHODS

From January 2017 to January 2019, we enrolled 112 MHD patients and 112 controls in Ningbo First Hospital, and retrospectively counted the cardiovascular events in the next 2 years after enrollment. According to the occurrence of cardiovascular events, the MHD patients were divided into CVD group and non-CVD group. The differences of vertebral BMD and CACs between the two groups were compared. ROC curve, Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression analyses were used for assess the predictive value of 2-year cardiovascular events in MHD patients.

RESULTS

Among 112 MHD patients, 49 (43.75%) patients had cardiovascular events. The results showed that the average value of BMD in MHD patients was significantly lower than that in the control group (99.88 ± 30.99 VS. 108.35 ± 23.98, P = 0.0231). The CACs in MHD patients were significantly higher than that in the control group (317.81 ± 211.53 VS. 190.03 ± 100.50, P < 0.001). The results between CVD group and the non-CVD group were to the same direction (BMD: 81.12 ± 31.28 VS. 114.48 ± 21.61, P < 0.001; CACs: 447.16 ± 234.11 VS. 217.21 ± 119.03, P < 0.001). Besides, CACs combined with BMD yield an AUC of 0.875 with a sensitivity of 79.60%, a specificity of 82.50%. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression analyses indicated that CACs and BMD were independently associated with high risk of cardiovascular events in MHD patients.

CONCLUSION

The combination of CACs and vertebral BMD could predict the occurrence of cardiovascular events in MHD patients to some extent.

Regional distribution and severity of arterial calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1-5: a cross-sectional study of the Copenhagen chronic kidney disease cohort

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and arterial calcification are considered at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, the optimal site for measurement of arterial calcification has not been determined. The primary aim of this study was to examine the pattern of arterial calcification in different stages of CKD.

METHODS

This was an observational, cross-sectional study that included 580 individuals with CKD stages 1-5 (no dialysis) from the Copenhagen CKD Cohort. Calcification of the carotid, coronary and iliac arteries, thoracic and abdominal aorta was assessed using non-contrast multidetector computed tomography scans and quantified according to the Agatston method. Based on the distribution of Agatston scores in the selected arterial region, the subjects were divided into calcium score categories of 0 (no calcification), 1-100, 101-400 and > 400.

RESULTS

Participants with CKD stages 3-5 had the highest prevalence of calcification and the highest frequency of calcium scores > 400 in all arterial sites. Calcification in at least one arterial site was present in > 90% of patients with CKD stage 3. In all five CKD stages prevalence of calcification was greatest in both the thoracic and abdominal aorta, and in the iliac arteries. These arterial sites also showed the highest calcium scores. High calcium scores (> 400) in all five arterial regions were independently associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease. In multivariable analyses, after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, declining creatinine clearance was associated with increasing calcification of the coronary arteries (p = 0.012) and the thoracic aorta (p = 0.037) only.

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial calcification is highly prevalent throughout all five CKD stages and is most prominent in both the thoracic and abdominal aorta, and in the iliac arteries. Follow-up studies are needed to explore the potential of extracardiac calcification sites in prediction of cardiovascular events in the CKD population.

Prognostic value of the coronary artery calcium score in suspected coronary artery disease: a study of 644 symptomatic patients

Aim

The long-term value of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning has not been studied extensively in symptomatic patients, but was evaluated by us in 644 consecutive patients referred for stable chest pain.

Methods

We excluded patients with a history of cardiovascular disease and with a CAC score of zero. CAC scanning was done with a 16-row MDCT scanner. Endpoints were: (a) overall mortality, (b) mortality or non-fatal myocardial infarction and (c) the composite of mortality, myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation. Revascularisations within 1 year following CAC scanning were not considered.

Results

The mean age of the 320 women and 324 men was 63 years. Follow-up was over 8 years. There were 58 mortalities, while 22 patients suffered non-fatal myocardial infarction and 24 underwent coronary revascularisation, providing 104 combined endpoints. Cumulative 8‑year survival was 95% with CAC score <100, 90% in patients with CAC score >100 and <400, and 82% with CAC score ≥400 Agatston units. Risk of mortality with a CAC score >100 and ≥400 units was 2.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23–5.54], and 4.6 (95% CI 2.1–9.47) respectively. After correction for clinical risk factors, CAC score remained independently associated with increased risk of cardiac events.

Conclusions

Risk increased with increasing CAC score. Patients with CAC >100 or ≥400 Agatston units were at increased risk of major adverse cardiac events and are eligible for preventive measures. CAC scanning provided incremental prognostic information to guide the choice of diagnostic and therapeutic options in many subjects evaluated for chest pain.

Association of non-invasive measures of subclinical atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness with mortality and major cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Background

Non-invasive cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction, in subclinical stages, aiming to stratify patients and tailor interventions remains an unmet need in chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this meta-analysis, we summarize the association of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and CV events in non-dialysis CKD and patients on haemodialysis.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Results

Out of 27 984 records, a total of 45 studies were eligible for quantitative synthesis; 11 for cIMT, 18 for CACS and 16 for PWV involving 2235, 4904 and 5717 patients, respectively. Meta-analysis was possible from pooled data of five cIMT studies (708 subjects), eight CACS studies (862 subjects) and nine PWV studies (1508 subjects). In dialysis patients, cIMT was associated with all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR) per unit increase: 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.17, I ²: 68%] and CV mortality (RR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.47, I ²: 0%). High versus low CACS was associated with all-cause mortality (RR: 2.51, 95% CI 1.66-3.79, I ²: 5.7%) and CV events (RR: 3.77 95% CI 2.16-6.58, I ²: 20.2%). High versus low PWV was associated with all-cause (RR: 5.34, 95% CI 3.01-9.47, I ²: 0%) and CV mortality (RR: 8.55, 95% CI 4.37-16.73, I ²: 0%). The combined estimated for all-cause mortality per 1 m/s increment unit in PWV was 1.25 (95% CI 1.17-1.34, I ²: 0%) and for CV mortality was 1.24 (95% CI 1.16-1.34, I ²: 15.5%). In non-dialysis patients, CACS was associated with CV events (RR: 4.02, 95% CI 1.57-10.29, I ²: 63.4%). High versus low PWV was associated with all-cause mortality (RR: 2.52, 95% CI 1.40-4.55, I ²: 62.6%).

Conclusions

Non-invasive measures of atherosclerosis and arterial stiffening are associated with all-cause and CV mortality as well as CV events among patients with all stages of CKD. These markers could be considered for the evaluation of CV morbidity and mortality risks. Moreover, the results of this meta-analysis support the study of interventions, with effect on these markers of vascular disease, on long-term CVD outcomes.

The Predictive Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring for Major Adverse Cardiac Events According to Renal Function (from the Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Evaluation for Clinical Outcomes: An International Multicenter [CONFIRM] Registry)

The prognostic performance of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) for predicting adverse outcomes in patients with decreased renal function remains unclear. We aimed to examine whether CACS improves risk stratification by demonstrating incremental value beyond a traditional risk score according to renal function status. 9,563 individuals without known coronary artery disease were enrolled. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m²) was ascertained using the modified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula, and was categorized as: ≥90, 60 to 89, and <60. CACS was categorized as 0, 1 to 100, 101 to 400, and >400. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), comprising all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and late revascularization (>90 days). Mean age was 55.8 ± 11.5 years (52.8% male). In total, 261 (2.7%) patients experienced MACE over a median follow-up of 24.5 months (interquartile range: 16.9 to 41.1). Incident MACE increased with higher CACS across each eGFR category, with the highest rate observed among patients with CACS >400 and eGFR <60 (95.1 per 1,000 person-years). A CACS >400 increased MACE risk with HR 4.46 (95% CI 1.68 to 11.85), 6.63 (95% CI 4.03 to 10.92), and 6.14 (95% CI 2.85 to 13.21) for eGFR ≥90, 60 to 89, and <60, respectively, as compared with CACS 0. Further, CACS improved discrimination and reclassification beyond Framingham 10-year risk score (FRS) (AUC: 0.70 vs 0.64; category free-NRI: 0.51, all p <0.001) for predicting MACE in patients with impaired renal function (eGFR < 90). In conclusion, CACS improved risk stratification and provided incremental value beyond FRS for predicting MACE, irrespective of eGFR status.

Impaired renal function is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with chest pain discharged from internal medicine wards

BACKGROUND

Assessment of chest pain is one of the most common reasons for hospital admissions in internal medicine wards. However, little is known regarding predictors for poor prognosis in patients discharged from internal medicine wards after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) rule-out.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of kidney function with mortality and hospital admissions due to ACS in patients with chest pain who were discharged from internal medicine wards following ACS rule-out.

METHODS

Included were patients admitted to an internal medicine ward who were subsequently discharged following an ACSrule-out during 2010-2016. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality and hospital admission due to ACS at 30-days following hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Included in the study were12,337 patients who were divided into 3 groups according to renal function. Considering patients with an eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73m² as the reference group yielded adjusted hazard ratios for the composite of 30-day all-cause mortality and hospital admission for ACS that increased with reduced eGFR (HR = 2, 95%CI = 1.3-3.3, HR = 4.8, 95%CI = 3-7.6, for patients with eGFR of 45 to 59.9 or <45 ml/min/1.73m², respectively, p < 0.001). Similarly, reduced renal function was associated with increased 1-year all-cause mortality (HR = 1.6, 95%CI = 1.2-2.2, HR = 4.5, 95%CI = 3.4-5.9, for patients with eGFR of 45-59.9 or <45 ml/min/1.73m², respectively, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found an independent graded association between lower eGFR and the risk of death and ACS among patients with chest pain who were discharged from internal medicine wards following an ACS rule-out. The eGFR may be combined in the risk stratification of patients with chest pain.

Association between plasma proprotein convertase subtisilin/kexin type 9 concentration and coronary artery calcification

Background

Plasma proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) has been reported to be related to several risk factors and diseases such as inflammatory markers and coronary artery disease. The aim of present study was to investigate whether plasma PCSK9 concentration was associated with coronary artery calcification.

Methods

A total of 403 consecutive untreated patients with angina-like chest pain, who received electron beam computed tomography, were enrolled and a coronary artery calcification score (CACS) was also measured. The baseline clinical characteristics were collected and blood sample was taken after 12-h fasting. The plasma PCSK9 concentrations were determined by ELISA in all patients, and the relationship between plasma PCSK9 concentrations and CACS was investigated.

Results

Patients with coronary artery calcification (CACS > 0) had significant higher plasma PCSK9 concentrations compared with those (CACS = 0) without coronary artery calcification (258.58 ± 69.53 ng/mL vs. 202.53 ± 52.17 ng/mL, P < 0.001). Patients with highest PCSK9 concentrations had the highest CACS. Multivariable linear regression analysis suggested that PCSK9 was independently associated with coronary artery calcification ( P = 0.002) after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Furthermore, the area under the curve for the plasma PCSK9 concentration in predicting coronary artery calcification was 0.736 (95% CI: 0.687–0.785, P < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 70%.

Conclusion

A positive association between plasma PCSK9 concentration and coronary artery calcification in untreated patients with angina-like chest pain was observed in our study, suggesting that further investigation may be needed in order to confirm our primary findings and explore the clinical implications.