Effect of Metformin on Renal Function After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Without Diabetes Presenting with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction: Data from the GIPS-III Trial

Appraisal of guidelines for managing contrast medium in patients with metformin: consensuses, controversies, and gaps

OBJECTIVES

The current guidelines contain substantial inconsistency regarding the use of metformin concomitantly with contrast media. The objective of this study is to appraise the guidelines and summarize the agreements and differences among recommendations.

METHODS

Our search focused on English language guidelines published between 2018 and 2021. Guidelines for the management of contrast media in patients with continuous metformin were included. Guidelines were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.

RESULTS

Six guidelines out of 1134 fulfilled the inclusion criteria with an AGREE II score of 79.2% (IQR 72.7 to 85.1%). There was good overall quality of the guidelines, with six considered "strongly recommended." CPGs scored poorly in "Clarity of Presentation" and "Applicability," with scores of 75.9% and 76.4%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent in each domain. There are some guidelines (33.3%) that recommend discontinuation of metformin in patients with an eGFR of < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, while some guidelines (16.7%) suggest the threshold of renal function should be eGFR < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2.

CONCLUSIONS

Most guidelines recommend withdrawing metformin before using contrast agents in diabetic patients with severely impaired kidney function but disagree on the renal function thresholds. Furthermore, the gaps regarding discontinuing metformin with moderate renal impairment (30 mL/min/1.73 m2 < eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) must be considered in future studies.

KEY POINTS

• Guidelines involving metformin and contrast agents are reliable and optimal. • Most guidelines advocate discontinuing metformin before using contrast agents in diabetic patients with advanced renal failure, but there are controversial suggestions regarding kidney function thresholds. • The gaps regarding the time of discontinuation of the metformin with moderate renal impairment (30 mL/min/1.73 m2 < eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) must be considered in the extensive RCT studies.

Safety of metformin continuation in diabetic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography: the NO-STOP single arm trial

BACKGROUND

Despite paucity of data, it is common practice to discontinue metformin before invasive coronary angiography due to an alleged risk of Metformin-Associated Lactic Acidosis (M-ALA). We aimed at assessing the safety of metformin continuation in diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography in terms of significant increase in lactate levels.

METHODS

In this open-label, prospective, multicentre, single-arm trial, all diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention at 3 European centers were screened for enrolment. The primary endpoint was the increase in lactate levels from preprocedural levels at 72-h after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included contrast associated-acute kidney injury (CA-AKI), M-ALA, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

142 diabetic patients on metformin therapy were included. Median preprocedural lactate level was 1.8 mmol/l [interquartile range (IQR) 1.3-2.3]. Lactate levels at 72 h after coronary angiography were 1.7 mmol/l (IQR 1.3-2.3), with no significant differences as compared to preprocedural levels (p = 0.91; median difference = 0; IQR - 0.5 to 0.4 mmol/l). One patient had 72-h levels ≥ 5 mmol/l (5.3 mmol/l), but no cases of M-ALA were reported. CA-AKI occurred in 9 patients (6.1%) and median serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate remained similar throughout the periprocedural period. At a median follow-up of 90 days (43-150), no patients required hemodialysis and 2 patients died due to non-cardiac causes.

CONCLUSIONS

In diabetic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography, metformin continuation throughout the periprocedural period does not increase lactate levels and was not associated with any decline in renal function.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04766008).

Metformin Can Be Safely Used in Patients Exposed to Contrast Media: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There have been few studies published on the use of contrast media (CM) in metformin-treated patients. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between metformin and contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI).

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for literature on associations between metformin use and CI-AKI incidence was conducted. The pooled odds ratio (OR), or relative risk, as well as the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), was calculated to assess the relationship between metformin and CI-AKI risk as well as the incidence of lactic acidosis (LA).

RESULTS

In total, seven studies met our eligibility criteria on associations between metformin use and CI-AKI incidence, comprising 2,325 individuals, with 279 new cases of CI-AKI exposed to CM. The pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant increase in the risk of CI-AKI development in patients who used metformin continuously (random-effects OR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.70-1.90, p = 0.57). No cases of LA that occurred during CM exposure were reported.

CONCLUSION

Metformin can be safely used in patients with moderate renal impairment (eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) during CM exposure.

Continuous use of metformin in patients receiving contrast medium: what is the evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Substantial inconsistencies exist in current guidelines regarding recommendations of metformin usage with the administration of a contrast medium. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis to determine whether the risks of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) and lactic acidosis increase with metformin use in diabetic patients receiving a contrast medium.

METHODS

Studies were retrieved from databases from inception to May 15, 2021. Studies that compared the outcomes of using metformin with not using metformin during contrast medium administration were included. The primary outcomes were incidence of CI-AKI and lactic acidosis. The secondary outcomes were renal function changes from baseline. Data analysis was using risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

Analyses of two randomized controlled trials and four retrospective cohorts examining a total of 1459 patients revealed no significant differences in the incidence of CI-AKI (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.63) and in changes in renal function measurements (serum creatinine: MD = 0.00 mg/dL, 95% CI, - 0.05 to 0.05; estimated glomerular filtration rate: MD = 0.22, 95% CI, - 2.47 to 2.91) after contrast medium administration between patients using and not using metformin.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that continuing metformin during contrast medium administration is associated with a higher risk of CI-AKI, lactic acidosis, or renal function deterioration compared to patients who discontinued metformin or who were not metformin users. The limited quality of the included studies may compromise the strength of evidence provided in this meta-analysis.

KEY POINTS

There is no need to discontinue metformin either before or after intravenous contrast medium exposure in patients with eGFR > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. In patients receiving intra-arterial contrast medium with first-pass renal exposure, there is no need to withhold metformin if eGFR is above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. For patients who have an eGFR level between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and are receiving intra-arterial contrast medium with first-pass renal exposure, no case of lactic acidosis was observed based on present data, but further evidence is needed to make a strong suggestion regarding its safety.

Temporal Course of Plasma Trimethylamine N-Oxide (TMAO) Levels in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The gut metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) at admission has a prognostic value in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, its sequential changes and relationship with long-term infarct-related outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain elusive. We delineated the temporal course of TMAO and its relationship with infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) post-PCI, adjusting for the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We measured TMAO levels at admission, 24 h and 4 months post-PCI in 379 STEMI patients. Infarct size and LVEF were determined by cardiac magnetic resonance 4 months after PCI. TMAO levels decreased from admission (4.13 ± 4.37 μM) to 24 h (3.41 ± 5.84 μM, p = 0.001) and increased from 24 h to 4 months (3.70 ± 3.86 μM, p = 0.026). Higher TMAO values at 24 h were correlated to smaller infarct sizes (rho = −0.16, p = 0.024). Larger declines between admission and 4 months suggestively correlated with smaller infarct size, and larger TMAO increases between 24 h and 4 months were associated with larger infarct size (rho = −0.19, p = 0.008 and rho = −0.18, p = 0.019, respectively). Upon eGFR stratification using 90 mL/min/1.73 m² as a cut-off, significant associations between TMAO and infarct size were only noted in subjects with impaired renal function. In conclusion, TMAO levels in post-PCI STEMI patients are prone to fluctuations, and these fluctuations could be prognostic for infarct size, particularly in patients with impaired renal function.

Evidence-Based Practices in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Cardiac catheterization procedures have rapidly evolved and expanded in scope and techniques over the past few decades. However, although some practices have emerged based on evidence, many traditions have persisted based on beliefs and theoretical concerns. The aim of this review is to highlight common preprocedure, intraprocedure, and postprocedure catheterization laboratory practices where evidence has accumulated over the past few decades to support or discount traditionally held practices.

Use of Anti-Diabetic Agents in Non-Diabetic Kidney Disease: From Bench to Bedside

New drugs were recently developed to treat hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). However, metformin remains the first-line anti-diabetic agent because of its cost-effectiveness. It has pleiotropic action that produces cardiovascular benefits, and it can be useful in diabetic nephropathy, although metformin-associated lactic acidosis is a hindrance to its use in patients with kidney failure. New anti-diabetic agents, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and sodium-glucose transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, also produce cardiovascular or renal benefits in T2D patients. Their glucose-independent beneficial actions can lead to cardiorenal protection via hemodynamic stabilization and inflammatory modulation. Systemic hypertension is relieved by natriuresis and improved vascular dysfunction. Enhanced tubuloglomerular feedback can be restored by SGLT-2 inhibition, reducing glomerular hypertension. Patients with non-diabetic kidney disease might also benefit from those drugs because hypertension, proteinuria, oxidative stress, and inflammation are common factors in the progression of kidney disease, irrespective of the presence of diabetes. In various animal models of non-diabetic kidney disease, metformin, GLP-1R agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, and SGLT-2 inhibitors were favorable to kidney morphology and function. They strikingly attenuated biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in diseased kidneys. However, whether those animal results translate to patients with non-diabetic kidney disease has yet to be evaluated. Considering the paucity of new agents to treat kidney disease and the minimal adverse effects of metformin, GLP-1R agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, and SGLT-2 inhibitors, these anti-diabetic agents could be used in patients with non-diabetic kidney disease. This paper provides a rationale for clinical trials that apply metformin, GLP-1R agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, and SGLT-2 inhibitors to non-diabetic kidney disease.

Increasing metformin concentrations and its excretion in both rat and porcine ex vivo normothermic kidney perfusion model

INTRODUCTION

Metformin can accumulate and cause lactic acidosis in patients with renal insufficiency. Metformin is known to inhibit mitochondria, while renal secretion of the drug by proximal tubules indirectly requires energy. We investigated whether addition of metformin before or during ex vivo isolated normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of porcine and rat kidneys affects its elimination.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

First, Lewis rats were pretreated with metformin or saline the day before nephrectomy. Subsequently, NMP of the kidney was performed for 90 min. Metformin was added to the perfusion fluid in one of three different concentrations (none, 30 mg/L or 300 mg/L). Second, metformin was added in increasing doses to the perfusion fluid during 4 hours of NMP of porcine kidneys. Metformin concentration was determined in the perfusion fluid and urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Metformin clearance was approximately 4-5 times higher than creatinine clearance in both models, underscoring secretion of the drug. Metformin clearance at the end of NMP in rat kidneys perfused with 30 mg/L was lower than in metformin pretreated rats without the addition of metformin during perfusion (both p≤0.05), but kidneys perfused with 300 mg/L trended toward lower metformin clearance (p=0.06). Creatinine clearance was not different between treatment groups. During NMP of porcine kidneys, metformin clearance peaked at 90 min of NMP (18.2±13.7 mL/min/100 g). Thereafter, metformin clearance declined, while creatinine clearance remained stable. This observation can be explained by saturation of metformin transporters with a Michaelis-Menten constant (95% CI) of 23.0 (10.0 to 52.3) mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Metformin was secreted during NMP of both rat and porcine kidneys. Excretion of metformin decreased under increasing concentrations of metformin, which might be explained by saturation of metformin transporters rather than a self-inhibitory effect. It remains unknown whether a self-inhibitory effect contributes to metformin accumulation in humans with longer exposure times.

Metformin Preconditioning and Postconditioning to Reduce Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in an Isolated Ex Vivo Rat and Porcine Kidney Normothermic Machine Perfusion Model

Metformin may act renoprotective prior to kidney transplantation by reducing ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). This study examined whether metformin preconditioning and postconditioning during ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of rat and porcine kidneys affect IRI. In the rat study, saline or 300 mg/kg metformin was administered orally twice on the day before nephrectomy. After 15 minutes of warm ischemia, kidneys were preserved with static cold storage for 24 hours. Thereafter, 90 minutes of NMP was performed with the addition of saline or metformin (30 or 300 mg/L). In the porcine study, after 30 minutes of warm ischemia, kidneys were preserved for 3 hours with oxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion. Subsequently, increasing doses of metformin were added during 4 hours of NMP. Metformin preconditioning of rat kidneys led to decreased injury perfusate biomarkers and reduced proteinuria. Postconditioning of rat kidneys resulted, dose-dependently, in less tubular cell necrosis and vacuolation. Heat shock protein 70 expression was increased in metformin-treated porcine kidneys. In all studies, creatinine clearance was not affected. In conclusion, both metformin preconditioning and postconditioning can be done safely and improved rat and porcine kidney quality. Because the effects are minor, it is unknown which strategy might result in improved organ quality after transplantation.

Effect of continuous use of metformin on kidney function in diabetes patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Diabetes patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) scheduled for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have an increased risk of contrast induced-acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). The effects of continuous use of metformin on kidney function are still controversial in patients submitted to primary PCI. This study aimed to assess continuous metformin therapy on kidney function in diabetic patients undergoing coronary intervention.

METHODS

Two hundred eighty-four patients with metformin-treated diabetes, who underwent coronary intervention within 24 h for STEMI, were enrolled in the retrospective study. All the patients had estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. According to the physicians' decisions after admission, 119 patients continued metformin treatment after primary PCI, while 165 patients discontinued it > 48 h after the procedure. Serum creatinine was collected at admission and within 48 h post primary PCI to evaluate the incidence of CI-AKI. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to examine the determinants of CI-AKI.

RESULTS

No statistical difference in CI-AKI incidence between the continuous and the discontinuous metformin group (12.6%vs10.3%, p = 0.545). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated eGFR ≤60 ml/min/1.73 m2[p = 0.025, OR: 3.131; 95% CI (1.156-8.482)] and contrast volume [p = 0.002, OR: 1.010; 95% CI (1.004-1.016)] were predictive factors of CI-AKI. Metformin therapy was irrelevant to CI-AKI [p = 0.365, OR: 0.698; 95% CI (0.320-1.521)]. No case of lactic acidosis was found in this study. Besides, the study supported discontinuation of metformin was not beneficial for patients' blood glucose control after admission.

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicated that the metformin continuation after primary PCI for STEMI in diabetic patients with eGFR > 30 ml/min / 1.73 m2 did not increase the risk of CI-AKI.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade is associated with higher risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with diabetes

As the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular comorbidities continues to rise, driven by increased prevalence of obesity and an aging population, so does the demand for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to restore cardiac blood flow. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors are commonly prescribed to hypertensive diabetic patients to prevent diabetic nephropathy. However, evidence suggests that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may increase the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) following coronary angiography (CAG) and PCI. We therefore conducted a retrospective, multicenter study applying the propensity score matching method to evaluate the impact of RAAS inhibition on CIAKI in diabetic patients undergoing CAG/PCI. Among 2240 subjects that met the inclusion criteria, 704 patients in the ACEIs/ARBs group were successfully matched to eligible control patients. The incidence of CIAKI (serum creatinine increase ≥0.5 mg/dl or ≥25% from baseline within 72 h post-CAG/PCI) was significantly higher in the ACEIs/ARBs group than in the control group (26.6% vs. 16.2%, P<0.001). However, control patients showed increased risk of overall adverse cardiovascular events (4.1% vs. 1.8% for ACEIs/ARBs; P=0.016). These data indicate that RAAS inhibition increases the risk of CIAKI in diabetic patients, but confers protection against early cardiovascular events.

Association between physical activity and change in renal function in patients after acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Combined renal dysfunction worsens the subsequent prognosis in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Therefore, establishing a therapeutic modality to maintain or improve renal function in AMI patients is necessary. This study aimed to elucidate the association between physical activity level and change in renal function in such patients.

DESIGN

Prospective and observational study.

METHODS

We enrolled 41 patients (35 men; average age, 67.5 ± 12.6 years) after AMI onset. Blood biochemistry, urinalysis, and physical function tests were conducted at discharge and 3 months after discharge. Renal function was evaluated based on cystatin C based-estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcys). The number of steps was recorded for 3 months post-discharge. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) was used to test the association between physical activity level and within-patient changes in eGFRcys.

RESULTS

Patients were stratified into low (n = 21; number of steps, 2335 ± 1219 steps/day) and high groups (n = 20; number of steps, 7102 ± 2365 steps/day). eGFRcys significantly increased from baseline to after 3 months in the high group (76.5 ± 13.8 to 83.2 ± 16.0 mL/min/1.73 m2, q = 0.004), whereas no significant change was observed in the low group (65.1 ± 15.9 to 62.2 ± 20.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, q = 0.125). Result of GEE adjusted for potential confounding variables showed a significant positive association between physical activity level and within-patient changes in eGFRcys (p = 0.003). Changes in eGFRcys was -2.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 among low group versus +6.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 among high group.

CONCLUSIONS

Physical activity level was positively associated with changes in renal function, demonstrating that high physical activity may suppress renal function decline in patients after AMI.

Impact of continuation of metformin prior to elective coronary angiography on acute contrast nephropathy in patients with normal or mildly impaired renal functions

Objective:

Discontinuation of metformin treatment in patients scheduled for elective coronary angiography (CAG) is controversial because of post-procedural risks including acute contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and lactic acidosis (LA). This study aims to discuss the safety of continuing metformin treatment in patients undergoing elective CAG with normal or mildly impaired renal functions.

Methods:

Our study was designed as a single-centered, randomized, and observational study including 268 patients undergoing elective CAG with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of >60 mL/min/1.73 m². Of these patients, 134 continued metformin treatment during angiography, whereas 134 discontinued it 24 h before the procedure. CIN was defined as either a 25% relative increase in serum creatinine levels from the baseline or a 0.5 mg/dL increase in the absolute value that measured 48 h after CAG. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of CIN and LA after CAG.

Results:

Both groups were comparable in terms of demographics and laboratory values. CIN at 48 h was 8% (11/134) in the metformin continued group and 6% (8/134) in the metformin discontinued group (p=0.265). Patients in neither of the groups developed metformin-induced LA. Based on multiple regression analysis, the ejection fraction [p=0.029, OR: 0.760; 95% CI (0.590–0.970)] and contrast volume [p=0.016, OR: 0.022 95% CI (0.010–0.490)] were independent predictors of CIN.

Conclusion:

Patients scheduled for elective CAG with normal or mildly impaired renal functions and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>40%) may safely continue metformin treatment.

Metformin and contrast-induced acute kidney injury in diabetic patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: Amulticenter study

AIM

To analyze the association between chronic metformin treatment and the development of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with PCI <24h in 2 coronary care units were included. Serum creatinine (Cr) was measured before and <48h after PCI. CI-AKI was defined as an increase in Cr>27μmol/l (0.3mg/dl) or >50% over baseline after PCI. Since PCI was urgent, metformin could not be withheld prior to PCI but was usually stopped after PCI.

RESULTS

Among the 372 patients included, 147 (40%) were using metformin, which had older diabetes, but had risk factors similar to patients without metformin. Baseline eGFR was better in patients under metformin therapy. After PCI, we observed an increase of ≈10% in Cr, for both groups. There was a trend toward a lower rate of CI-AKI in patients under metformin (16% vs 25%, p=0.051). In patients with chronic kidney disease, 31 (26%) were under metformin therapy, and the rate of CI-AKI was similar in both groups (41% vs 40%, p=0.915). By multivariate analysis, metformin showed a trend toward a reduced rate of CI-AKI, even when adjusted for confounding (OR (95% CI): 0.548 (0.276-1.087)). No case of lactic acidosis was reported during the hospital stay. Moreover, there was no increased rate of cardiogenic shock or death with metformin treatment.

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter observational study, chronic metformin treatment prior to primary PCI had no significant impact on CI-AKI.