Randomized clinical trial of abluminus DES+ sirolimus-eluting stent versus everolimus-eluting DES for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus: An optical coherence tomography study

BACKGROUND

Diabetic patients are at higher risk of recurrent adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than the nondiabetics. Despite the introduction of new generation drug-eluting stents, their efficacy in the diabetics is still limited.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of the Abluminus DES+ biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in reducing neointimal hyperplasia in diabetic patients, compared to a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES).

METHODS

A total of 131 patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease were enrolled in six Italian centers and randomized in a 2:1 fashion to PCI with Abluminus DES+ or DP-EES: 85 were assigned to Abluminus DES+ and 46 to DP-EES. The primary endpoint was optimal coherence tomography (OCT)-derived neointimal volume at 9-12 months. Secondary endpoints included OCT-derived neointimal area, neointimal volume obstruction and adverse clinical events.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint, neointimal volume, did not differ between Abluminus DES+ and DP-EES (29.11 ± 18.90 mm3 vs. 25.48 ± 17.04 mm3 , p = 0.40) at 9-12-month follow-up. This finding remained consistent after weighing for the sum of stents lengths (1.14 ± 0.68 mm3 vs. 0.99 ± 0.74 mm3 for Abluminus DES+ and DP-EES, respectively, p = 0.38). Similarly, other OCT-derived and clinical secondary endpoints did not significantly differ between the two groups. Rate of target lesion failure was high in both groups (21.2% for Abluminus DES+ and 19.6% for DP-EES).

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study failed to demonstrate the superiority of the Abluminus DES+ over the DP-EES in diabetic patients in terms of neointimal proliferation.

Clinical and procedural outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions involving the ostial left circumflex coronary artery

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous treatment for ostial left circumflex artery (LCx) lesions is known to be associated with suboptimal results.

AIMS

The present study aims to assess the procedural and long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for de novo ostial LCx lesions overall and according to the coronary revascularization strategy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with second generation drug eluting stents or drug coated balloons for de novo ostial LCx lesions in three high-volume Italian centers between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was target-vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2 years. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause death, and repeat revascularization.

RESULTS

A total of 366 patients were included in the analysis with a median follow-up of 901 (IQR: 450-1728) days. 79.5% of the patients were male, 33.6% were diabetic, 49.7% had a previous PCI, and 23.1% a prior surgical revascularization. Very ostial LCx stenting was performed in 34.1%, crossover from left main to LCx in 17.3%, and a two-stent strategy in 48.6% of cases, respectively. In the overall population, the incidence of TVR at 2 years was 19.0% while MACCE rate was 25.7%. No major differences in clinical outcomes were found according to the stenting strategy. Use of intracoronary imaging was associated with fewer MACCE (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-1.13, p = 0.01), while the diameter of the stent implanted in the ostial LCx was associated with less TVR (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.25-0.75, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous revascularization of the ostial LCx is associated with a high rate of TVR, regardless of the stenting strategy. Intracoronary imaging and proper stent sizing may reduce the failure rates.

Comparison of Supraflex Cruz 60 μm Versus Ultimaster Tansei 80 μm Stent Struts in High Bleeding Risk PCI Patients: Study design and Rational of Compare 60/80 HBR trial

Up to 45% of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may have a high bleeding risk (HBR), depending on the bleeding risk definition.1 This condition is often associated with an enhanced risk of thrombotic events with a negative impact on short- and long-term outcomes,2-8 making the choice of an appropriate antithrombotic regimen after PCI particularly challenging. Advances in stent technologies, in which the introduction of newer generations of thinner strut drug-eluting stents (DES), have significantly reduced the rate of thrombotic complications and may justify a shorter dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that local hemodynamic factors may critically affect the natural history of atherosclerosis. Strut thickness correlates with flow disturbances and endothelial shear stress. Flow separation within struts determines areas of recirculation with low endothelial shear stress which promotes local concentration of activated platelets.9 By mitigating inflammation, vessel injury, and neointimal proliferation, thin and streamlined struts have been associated with faster vascular healing and re-endothelization and have resulted in lower rates of thrombotic events after PCI.10,11 The use of thin strut and ultra-thin strut stents may lead to a favorable trade-off in bleeding and ischemic events in patients with HBR. However, dedicated studies evaluating the performance of thin strut versus ultrathin strut stents in patients with HBR are lacking.

Coronary Vascular (DYS) Function and Invasive Physiology Assessment: Insights into Bolus and Continuous Thermodilution Methods

A considerable number of patients with angina or myocardial ischemia have no significant coronary artery disease on invasive angiography. In recent years, several steps towards a better comprehension of the pathophysiology of these conditions, angina or ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA/INOCA), have been made. Nevertheless, several gaps in knowledge still remain. This review is intended to provide a comprehensive overview of ANOCA and INOCA, with a particular focus on pathophysiology, recent diagnostic innovations, gaps in knowledge and treatment modalities.

Long-term prognostic impact of subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients recovered from COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular sequelae may occur in patients recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Recent studies have detected a considerable incidence of subclinical myocardial dysfunction-assessed with speckle-tracking echocardiography-and of long-COVID symptoms in these patients. This study aimed to define the long-term prognostic role of subclinical myocardial dysfunction and long-COVID condition in patients recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia.

METHODS

We prospectively followed up 110 patients hospitalized at our institution due to COVID-19 pneumonia in April 2020 and then recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. A 7-month clinical and echocardiographic evaluation was performed, followed by a 21-month clinical follow-up. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

A subclinical myocardial dysfunction-defined as an impairment of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (≥-18%)-was identified at a 7-month follow-up in 37 patients (34%), was associated with an increased risk of long-term MACE with a good discriminative power (area under the curve: .73) and resulted in a strong independent predictor of extended MACE in multivariate regression analyses. Long-COVID condition was not associated with a worse long-term prognosis, instead.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia, a subclinical myocardial dysfunction is present in one-third of the whole population at 7-month follow-up and is associated with a higher risk of MACE at long-term follow-up. Speckle-tracking echocardiography is a promising tool to optimize the risk-stratification in patients recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia, while the definition of a long-COVID condition has no prognostic relevance.

Safety of metformin continuation in diabetic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography: the NO-STOP single arm trial

BACKGROUND

Despite paucity of data, it is common practice to discontinue metformin before invasive coronary angiography due to an alleged risk of Metformin-Associated Lactic Acidosis (M-ALA). We aimed at assessing the safety of metformin continuation in diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography in terms of significant increase in lactate levels.

METHODS

In this open-label, prospective, multicentre, single-arm trial, all diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention at 3 European centers were screened for enrolment. The primary endpoint was the increase in lactate levels from preprocedural levels at 72-h after the procedure. Secondary endpoints included contrast associated-acute kidney injury (CA-AKI), M-ALA, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

142 diabetic patients on metformin therapy were included. Median preprocedural lactate level was 1.8 mmol/l [interquartile range (IQR) 1.3-2.3]. Lactate levels at 72 h after coronary angiography were 1.7 mmol/l (IQR 1.3-2.3), with no significant differences as compared to preprocedural levels (p = 0.91; median difference = 0; IQR - 0.5 to 0.4 mmol/l). One patient had 72-h levels ≥ 5 mmol/l (5.3 mmol/l), but no cases of M-ALA were reported. CA-AKI occurred in 9 patients (6.1%) and median serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate remained similar throughout the periprocedural period. At a median follow-up of 90 days (43-150), no patients required hemodialysis and 2 patients died due to non-cardiac causes.

CONCLUSIONS

In diabetic patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography, metformin continuation throughout the periprocedural period does not increase lactate levels and was not associated with any decline in renal function.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04766008).

144 LONG-TERM PROGNOSTIC IMPACT OF SUBCLINICAL MYOCARDIAL DYSFUNCTION IN PATIENTS RECOVERED FROM COVID-19

Aims

Cardiovascular sequelae may occur in patients recovered from COVID-19. Recent studies have detected a considerable incidence of subclinical myocardial dysfunction – assessed with speckle-tracking echocardiography – and of long-COVID symptoms in these patients. This study aimed to define the long-term prognostic role of subclinical myocardial dysfunction and long-COVID condition in patients recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia.

Methods and Results

We prospectively followed-up 110 patients hospitalized at our Institution due to COVID-19 pneumonia in April 2020 and then recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. A 6-month clinical and echocardiographic evaluation was performed, followed by a 21-month clinical follow-up. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality. A subclinical myocardial dysfunction – defined as an impairment of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (≥ -18%) - was identified at 6-month follow-up in 37 patients (34%), was associated with an increased risk of long-term MACE with a good discriminative power (AUC: 0.73) and resulted a strong independent predictor of extended MACE in a multivariate regression analysis (OR 9.29, 95%CI 2.20–39.3, p=0.002). Long-COVID condition was not associated with a worse long-term prognosis, instead.

Conclusion

In patients recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia, a subclinical myocardial dysfunction is present in one third of the whole population at 6-month follow-up and is associated with a higher risk of MACE at long-term follow-up. Speckle-tracking echocardiography is a promising tool to optimise the risk-stratification in patients recovered from COVID-19 pneumonia, while the definition of a long-COVID condition has not prognostic relevance.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of left ventricular thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Evidence about the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with left ventricular thrombosis (LVT) are emerging. The aim of our study was to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence concerning the clinical effects of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in LVT treatment.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Systematic search of studies evaluating DOACs versus VKAs use in patients with LVT was performed on May 11^th, 2021. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Odds ratios (OR) with relative 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as measures of effect estimates. The primary efficacy and safety endpoint were ischemic stroke and any bleeding, respectively. Secondary endpoints were LVT resolution, systemic embolism, major bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, and all cause death.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twenty studies were included in the meta-analysis: 1,391 patients were treated with DOACs and 1,534 with VKAs. A significant reduction in the risk of ischemic stroke (OR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.45-0.98, P=0.048, number needed to treat to benefit [NNTB] 22 [95% CI 15-43]) and any bleeding (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.89, P=0.009, NNTB 26 [95% CI 16-80]) was observed with DOACs compared to VKAs. No statistically significant difference was observed among the two treatment arms for the secondary endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to VKAs, DOACs are associated with a reduced risk of ischemic stroke and bleeding. In light of these findings, and the practical advantages of DOACs, additional large scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the benefits of DOACs in patients with LVT.

Distal vs Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and/or Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing distal radial access (DRA) with conventional radial access (RA) is available.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to provide a quantitative appraisal of the effects of DRA) vs conventional RA for coronary angiography with or without intervention.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for RCT comparing DRA vs conventional RA for coronary angiography and/or intervention. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary endpoint was radial artery occlusion (RAO) at the longest available follow-up.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies enrolling 6,208 participants were included. Compared with conventional RA, DRA was associated with a significant lower risk of RAO, either detected at latest follow-up (risk ratio [RR]: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.23-0.56; P < 0.001; number needed to treat [NNT] = 30) or in-hospital (RR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.19-0.53; P < 0.001; NNT = 28), as well as EASY (Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries) ≥II hematoma (RR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27-0.96; P = 0.04; NNT = 107). By contrast, DRA was associated with a higher risk of access site crossover (RR: 3.08; 95% CI: 1.88-5.06; P < 0.001; NNT = 12), a longer time for radial puncture (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 3.56; 95% CI: 0.96-6.16; P < 0.001), a longer time for sheath insertion (SMD: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.16-0.58; P < 0.001), and a higher number of puncture attempts (SMD: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.48-0.69; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with conventional RA, DRA is associated with lower risks of RAO and EASY ≥II hematoma but requires longer time for radial artery cannulation and sheath insertion, more puncture attempts, and a higher access site crossover.

Long term follow-up after balloon expandable covered stents implantation for management of transcatheter aortic valve replacement related vascular access complications

OBJECTIVES

To report the experience of a high-volume center with balloon-expandable (BE) stents implantation to manage vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

BACKGROUND

Despite increased operator experience and better devices, vascular complications after TAVR are still a major issue and covered stent implantation is often required.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected baseline and procedural data about 78 consecutive patients who underwent BE stent implantation to manage a vascular complication after transfemoral TAVR. Primary endpoints were technical success, incidence of new-onset claudication and need for vascular interventions during long-term follow-up. Secondary endpoints included length of hospitalization, in-hospital and 30-day mortality, and major postoperative complications.

RESULTS

BE stents implantation to manage vascular complications after TAVR was successfully performed in 96.2% of the cases, with bailout surgery required in two cases. One patient suffered in-hospital death. Predischarge Doppler Ultrasound revealed no cases of in-stent occlusion or fracture. At a median follow-up of 429 days (interquartile range, 89-994 days), no cases of symptomatic leg ischemia were reported and only one patient experienced new-onset claudication.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience showed good periprocedural and long-term results of BE covered stent implantation to manage vascular complication after TAVR. Their great radial outward force may guarantee effective hemostasis without necessarily being associated with stent deformation/fracture resulting in restenosis or further interventions. More research is needed to define the role of BE covered stents in this setting.

Effects of distal radial access vs conventional radial access in patients undergoing coronary angiography and/or intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised trials

Background

Recently the distal radial access (DRA) technique has been introduced for coronary angiography and intervention as an alternative to the conventional radial access (RA).

Purpose

The aim of this study was to provide a quantitative appraisal of the effects of DRA vs conventional RA for coronary angiography with or without intervention.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for randomised clinical trials (RCT) comparing DRA versus RA for coronary angiography and/or intervention. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The number of patients needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) and the number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) were calculated. The primary endpoint was radial artery occlusion (RAO) at the longest available follow-up. Additional secondary outcomes were assessed.

Results

A total of 13 RCT including 4,901 patients were identified and included in the final analysis. Coronary angiography alone was performed in 3 studies, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in a variable proportion of patients ranging from 24% to 100% across studies. Study population included patients with chronic coronary syndrome in the large majority, and the proportion of acute coronary syndrome ranged from to 31% to 100% across studies. Compared with RA, DRA was associated with a significant lower risk of RAO, either detected at the longest follow-up (risk ratio [RR]: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.58; p&lt;0.001, NNTB = 24.5), or in-hospital (RR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.57; p&lt;0.001, NNTB = 21.5), as well as Early discharge after transradial stenting of coronary arteries (EASY) Scale ≥ II hematoma (RR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.97; p=0.04, NNTB = 66). By contrast, DRA was associated with a higher risk of access site crossover (RR: 3.43; 95% CI: 1.88 to 6.25, p&lt;0.001, NNTH = 10), a longer time for radial artery puncture (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 3.56; 95% CI: 0.96 to 6.16; p&lt;0.001), and sheath insertion (SMD: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.65, p=0.006), and a higher number of puncture attempts (SMD: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.69, p&lt;0.001). A meta-regression analysis showed that increasing age in the RA group was associated with a reduced effect of DRA, compared with RA, on the risk of RAO. No significant effect of other variables such as the prevalence of female sex, diabetes, smoking status, acute coronary syndrome, and percutaneous coronary intervention was found.

Conclusions

Compared with RA, DRA is associated with lower risks of RAO and EASY ≥ II hematoma, but requires longer time for radial artery puncture and sheath insertion, more puncture attempts and a higher access site crossover.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

CMR-driven immunosuppressive therapy in systemic sclerosis patients with suspected myocarditis: a single-center experience

Background

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) myocarditis is common, but often underrecognized due to absence of symptoms at early stages. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is the imaging modality of choice for detection of SSc myocarditis. Current guidelines recommend CMR in case of alterations in first level cardiologic diagnostic tests. Immunosuppressive therapy is only indicated for patients with organ involvement, i.e. most frequently heart and lung, or with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis.

Purpose

To explore the impact of CMR in the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway of SSc patients.

Methods

Of 286 SSc patients referred to our hospital, we retrospectively enrolled patients who received CMR during an observational period of 6 years (2016–2022). Exclusion criteria were previous immunosuppressive therapy and cardiopathy from other cause. Clinical data including Holter-ECG performed within 90 days from CMR were available.

Results

39 patients (67 [58–72] years; females 87%) were identified. 15 patients were excluded due to previous immunosuppressive therapy (9), lack of information on therapy (3), cardiopathy from other causes (3). 24 patients were finally included in the study.

14 patients (58%) did not show myocardial inflammation at CMR (LVEF 65.5 [61–69]%, LVEDV 114.5 [92–141] ml, T2 ratio 1.6 [1.4–1.9]). 1 patient presented with mid-wall inferior late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) indicative of previous myocarditis. 1 patient received immunosuppressive therapy due to SSc lung involvement in follow-up. In this group premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) during 24-hours Holter-ECG were rare (29 [3–48]). When measured, high-sensitivity Troponin I (hsTnI) was 2.4 [0.8–5] ng/L.

10 patients (42%) showed myocardial inflammation at CMR: LVEF 60 [56–65] %, LVEDV 137,5 [122–166] ml, T2 ratio 2.1 [1.7–2.3], T1 mapping 1022.5 [1010–1036] msec and T2 mapping 50.5 [50–52] msec. Myocardial LGE with non-ischemic pattern was seen in 6 patients. The number of PVCs at 24-hours Holter-ECG was collectively higher in these patients (354 [1–4245]). When measured, hsTnI was 8 [6–18] ng/L. With detection of myocardial inflammation at CMR all 10 patients eventually received immunosuppressive therapy (mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine in case of MMF intolerance).

At follow-up CMR performed 4 [3–6] months later on therapy various parameter differences were observed: LVEF (+2 [−2; 4] %), T1 mapping (−23 [−27; −12] msec), T2 mapping (−2 [−4; −1] msec), T2 ratio (−0.5 [−0.6; −0,2]). Of 6 patients with LGE, 4 displayed LGE persistence at follow-up.

Conclusions

In our experience, CMR was the tool of choice for diagnosis and therapeutic management in SSc patients with suspected cardiac involvement. SSc myocarditis patients tended to display more arrhythmic burden at Holter-ECG and higher cardiac biomarkers. Our data suggest to intensify first level cardiological screening, in order to identify suitable candidates to CMR.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

398 Right ventricular cardiogenic shock induced by propafenone intoxication: a case report

Aims

Propafenone is a Class 1C antiarrhythmic drug recommended in the treatment of supraventricular or ventricular tachycardia and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Most common cardiological features associated with propafenone intoxication include heart failure and conduction disturbances while other clinical findings range from nausea and vomiting to seizures and coma.

Methods

We report a case of atypical presentation of propafenone intoxication occurred in 88-year-old woman who presented at Emergency Department with severe ECG abnormalities and prevalent acute right ventricular with massive tricuspidalic regurgitation and cardiogenic shock. The patient underwent urgent coronary angiography that revealed a stable 90% coronary plaque that was treated with a single stent and then brought to Intensive Care Unit where she was successfully treated with inotropic and mechanical circulatory support (intra-aortic balloon pump, IABP).

Results

The patient progressively achieved hemodynamic stability with complete ECG normalization and biventricular function recovery.

Conclusions

Our case further expands the vast spectrum of presentations of Class 1c antiarrhythmic drugs overdose. In an emergency setting it is difficult to rule out other causes of cardiogenic shock but propafenone toxicity needs to be suspected in every case of hemodynamic instability in patients in chronical treatment. Patients in chronical treatment with propafenone who have kidney or liver dysfunction might be at higher risk of drug accumulation: in such cases, the real utility of propafenone must be evaluated before therapy initiation.

491 Short-term prognostic implications of left ventricular myocardial work indices in advanced heart failure patients treated with repetitive Levosimendan infusions

Aims

Repetitive Levosimendan treatment in advanced heart failure patients has not been investigated yet via myocardial work indices (MWI), which could more accurately detect the effects of this both inotropic and vasodilatory drug. The aims of this study were (1) to describe variations of myocardial work indices, as a consequence of repetitive Levosimendan infusions and (2) to assess the prognostic value of myocardial work parameters in these patients.

Methods and results

Fourteen patients with advanced heart failure treated with intermittent in-hospital levosimendan infusions were prospectively included. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic assessment were performed before and after every Levosimendan infusion. The primary endpoint was a composite of any episode of decompensated HF, urgent HF rehospitalization, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and cardiovascular death at 4–6 weeks follow-up after each planned infusion. During follow-up (mean: 150 ± 99 days) a total of 37 infusions were performed and a total of 11 cardiovascular events occurred. Global constructive work (GCW), global work efficiency (GWE), and global work index (GWI) increased after Levosimendan infusion in 62.2%, 73.0%, and 70.3% of cases, with significant differences between patients with and without outcomes [delta GCW: −7.36 mmHg% (134.12) vs. 113.81 mmHg% (204.41), P = 0.007; delta GWE: −3.27% (8.38) vs. 4.30% (5.58), P = 0.002]. Delta value of GWE showed the largest area under curve (AUC: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.64–1.00, P = 0.002) for outcome prediction with a cut-off point of 0.5%. Independent prognostic value of GWE variation was confirmed in multivariable regression models (OR: 0.825, 95% CI: 0.702–0.970, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

GWE and GCW provided incremental and independent prognostic value at short-term follow-up over traditional echocardiographic parameters. The differentiation of patients into ‘workers’, whose GWE improved after Levosimendan infusion, and ‘non-workers’, who failed to improve their GWE, permitted to identify patients at higher risk of forthcoming cardiovascular events. Monitoring these patients with MWI may have relevant clinical implications.

21 Direct oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of left ventricular thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

Evidence about the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with left ventricular thrombosis (LVT) are emerging. The aim of our study was to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence concerning the clinical effects of DOACs vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in LVT treatment.

Methods

Systematic search of studies evaluating DOACs vs. VKAs use in patients with LVT was performed on 11 May 2021. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Odds ratios (OR) with relative 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as measures of effect estimates. The primary efficacy and safety endpoint were ischaemic stroke and any bleeding, respectively. Secondary endpoints were LVT resolution, systemic embolism, major bleeding, haemorrhagic stroke, and all cause death.

Results

Twenty studies were included in the meta-analysis: 1391 patients were treated with DOACs and 1534 with VKAs. A significant reduction in the risk of ischaemic stroke [OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45–0.98, P = 0.048, number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 22 (95% CI 15–43)] and any bleeding [OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46–0.89, P = 0.009, NNTB 26 (95% CI 16–80)] was observed with DOACs compared to VKAs. No statistically significant difference was observed among the two treatment arms for the secondary endpoints.

Conclusion

Compared to VKAs, DOACs are associated with a reduced risk of ischaemic stroke and bleeding. In light of these findings, and the practical advantages of DOACs, additional large scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the benefits of DOACs in patients with LVT.

397 Long-term follow-up after balloon expandable covered stents implantation for management of TAVI-related vascular access complications

Aims

Despite increasing experience and device innovation with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), vascular complications are still a major problem and endovascular management is generally the first option. When stent implantation is required, self expandable (SE) stents are generally preferred over balloon expandable (BE) stents as they are more elastic and less compressible. However, BE stents support higher radial outward force, adhere to the vase lumen with greater precision and are less expensive. As no large registry reported data about stents BE alone in this setting, we report our experience with BE stents implantation to manage a vascular complication after TAVI. We believe that our work could be useful and possibly serves as a starting point for future research.

Methods and results

We retrospectively collected baseline, procedural and follow-up data about 78 patients who were implanted with a BE stent to manage a vascular complication after TAVI. At a median clinical follow-up of 410 days (IQR: 66–1016 days), no percutaneous or surgical interventions were reported after discharge. No cases of symptomatic leg-ischaemia were reported and only one patient was symptomatic for claudication. Doppler follow-up (available for 25 patients; 32%) showed no cases of stent fracture or displacement.

Conclusions

Our experience showed good acute and long-term results of BE covered stent implantation to manage a vascular complication after TAVI. It is possible that a greater radial outward force is a good choice in terms of hemostasis without necessarily being associated with stent deformation/fracture resulting in restenosis or further interventions. While present data may not be generalized, they may be useful to critically re-evaluate (and eventually reduce) the need of SE stents when treating femoral arteries bleedings.

In-hospital prognostic role of coronary atherosclerotic burden in COVID-19 patients

AIMS

Currently, there are few available data regarding a possible role for subclinical atherosclerosis as a risk factor for mortality in Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) patients. We used coronary artery calcium (CAC) score derived from chest computed tomography (CT) scan to assess the in-hospital prognostic role of CAC in patients affected by COVID-19 pneumonia.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD) were excluded. A CAC score was calculated for each patient and was used to categorize them into one of four groups: 0, 1-299, 300-999 and at least 1000. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality for any cause.

RESULTS

The final population consisted of 282 patients. Fifty-seven patients (20%) died over a follow-up time of 40 days. The presence of CAC was detected in 144 patients (51%). Higher CAC score values were observed in nonsurvivors [median: 87, interquartile range (IQR): 0.0-836] compared with survivors (median: 0, IQR: 0.0-136). The mortality rate in patients with a CAC score of at least 1000 was significantly higher than in patients without coronary calcifications (50 vs. 11%) and CAC score 1-299 (50 vs. 23%), P < 0.05. After adjusting for clinical variables, the presence of any CAC categories was not an independent predictor of mortality; however, a trend for increased risk of mortality was observed in patients with CAC of at least 1000.

CONCLUSION

The correlation between CAC score and COVID-19 is fascinating and under-explored. However, in multivariable analysis, the CAC score did not show an additional value over more robust clinical variables in predicting in-hospital mortality. Only patients with the highest atherosclerotic burden (CAC ≥1000) could represent a high-risk population, similarly to patients with known CAD.

Risk factors for myocardial injury and death in patients with COVID-19: insights from a cohort study with chest computed tomography

AIMS

Whether pulmonary artery (PA) dimension and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, as assessed by chest computed tomography (CT), are associated with myocardial injury in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is not known. The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for myocardial injury and death and to investigate whether myocardial injury has an independent association with all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a single-centre cohort study including consecutive patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 undergoing chest CT on admission. Myocardial injury was defined as high-sensitivity troponin I >20 ng/L on admission. A total of 332 patients with a median follow-up of 12 days were included. There were 68 (20.5%) deaths; 123 (37%) patients had myocardial injury. PA diameter was higher in patients with myocardial injury compared with patients without myocardial injury [29.0 (25th-75th percentile, 27-32) mm vs. 27.7 (25-30) mm, P < 0.001). PA diameter was independently associated with an increased risk of myocardial injury [adjusted odds ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.19, P = 0.01] and death [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.17, P = 0.01]. Compared with patients without myocardial injury, patients with myocardial injury had a lower prevalence of a CAC score of zero (25% vs. 55%, P < 0.001); however, the CAC score did not emerge as a predictor of myocardial injury by multivariable logistic regression. Myocardial injury was independently associated with an increased risk of death by multivariable Cox regression (adjusted HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.27-3.96, P = 0.005). Older age, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio on admission were other independent predictors for both myocardial injury and death.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased PA diameter, as assessed by chest CT, is an independent risk factor for myocardial injury and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Myocardial injury is independently associated with an approximately two-fold increased risk of death.