Forecasting the Risk of Heart Failure Hospitalization After Acute Coronary Syndromes: the CORALYS HF Score

The present study aimed to identify patients at a higher risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in a population of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary revascularization without a history of HF or reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction before the index admission. We performed a Cox regression multivariable analysis with competitive risk and machine learning models on the incideNce and predictOrs of heaRt fAiLure After Acute coronarY Syndrome (CORALYS) registry (NCT04895176), an international and multicenter study including consecutive patients admitted for ACS in 16 European Centers from 2015 to 2020. Of 14,699 patients, 593 (4.0%) were admitted for the development of HF up to 1 year after the index ACS presentation. A total of 2 different data sets were randomly created, 1 for the derivative cohort including 11,626 patients (80%) and 1 for the validation cohort including 3,073 patients (20%). On the Cox regression multivariable analysis, several variables were associated with the risk of HF hospitalization, with reduced renal function, complete revascularization, and LV ejection fraction as the most relevant ones. The area under the curve at 1 year was 0.75 (0.72 to 0.78) in the derivative cohort, whereas on validation, it was 0.72 (0.67 to 0.77). The machine learning analysis showed a slightly inferior performance. In conclusion, in a large cohort of patients with ACS without a history of HF or LV dysfunction before the index event, the CORALYS HF score identified patients at a higher risk of hospitalization for HF using variables easily accessible at discharge. Further approaches to tackle HF development in this high-risk subset of patients are needed.

Impact of Complete Revascularization on Development of Heart Failure in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Disease: A Subanalysis of the CORALYS Registry

Background The impact of complete revascularization (CR) on the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remains to be elucidated. Methods and Results Consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome with multivessel coronary artery disease from the CORALYS (Incidence and Predictors of Heart Failure After Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry were included. Incidence of first hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death was the primary end point. Patients were stratified according to completeness of coronary revascularization. Of 14 699 patients in the CORALYS registry, 5054 presented with multivessel disease. One thousand four hundred seventy-three (29.2%) underwent CR, while 3581 (70.8%) did not. Over 5 years follow-up, CR was associated with a reduced incidence of the primary end point (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51-0.85]), first HF hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49-0.90]) along with all-cause death and cardiovascular death alone (adjusted HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56-0.97] and HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.38-0.84], respectively). The results were consistent in the propensity-score matching population and in inverse probability treatment weighting analysis. The benefit of CR was consistent across acute coronary syndrome presentations (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39-0.89] for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.50-0.99] for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome) and in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >40% (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37-0.72]), while no benefit was observed in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.37-1.10], P for interaction 0.04). Conclusions CR after acute coronary syndrome reduced the risk of first hospitalization for HF and cardiovascular death, as well as first HF hospitalization, and cardiovascular and overall death both in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04895176.

28 CONSTRICTIVE PERICARDITIS: A ROOM FOR MULTI-MODALITY IMAGING

Introduction

The diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis can be challenging through conventional imaging. Novel imaging techniques have been proposed to improve it.

Clinical Case

A 74-year-old man with a previous diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) was admitted because of worsening dyspnea, peripheral edema, and ascites refractory to diuretics therapy. ECG revealed low QRS voltages and AF with normal heart rate and laboratory exams detected increased values of BNP and hepatic stasis indices; blood count and CRP were normal. Echocardiography revealed mildly reduced bi-ventricular pump function (left ventricular ejection fraction = 52%, right ventricular fractional area change = 25%) and slightly increased wall thickness. Atria were moderately dilated (left and right atrium 46 and 44 ml/mq, respectively) and mitral and tricuspid annuli were dilated too. There was inferior vena cava plethora, moderate atriogenic tricuspid regurgitation and mild-to-moderate atriogenic mitral regurgitation. A paradoxical interventricular septal motion and significant respiratory changes on trans-mitral (>25%) and trans-tricuspid (>30%) pulsed Doppler were noted; however, there was no "annulus reversus" (lateral and septal e’ 13 and 11 cm/sec, respectively) at TDI analysis. In contrast, 2D-speckle-tracking global longitudinal strain showed impaired deformation ​​of the lateral segments with relative sparing of the septal segments. The latter pattern has been recently described as "strain reversus" or "hot septum sign". The findings were suspected of constrictive pericarditis, but a chest Computed Tomography excluded pericardial calcifications. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was then performed revealing a "septal shift" at cine-real time sequences analysis. The pericardium was slightly thickened (4-5 mm) with widespread late gadolinium enhancement but without signs of acute inflammation at T2-weighted imaging. Tricuspid regurgitation was confirmed to be "moderate" after phase-contrast imaging. Cardiac catheterization finally revealed normal coronary arteries and confirmed the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis (square root sign, equalization of bi-ventricular end-diastolic pressures). The patient underwent pericardiectomy and tricuspid and mitral valve repair and was asymptomatic at 6-months follow-up.

Conclusions

Constrictive pericarditis represents a potentially reversible cause of heart failure but can be easily missed through conventional imaging. In the present case, advanced echocardiography and CMR were essential to come up with an accurate diagnosis, guiding the patient's clinical management with excellent outcome.

C78 PREVALENCE AND MECHANISMS OF SEVERE MITRAL AND TRICUSPID REGURGITATION IN A HEART FAILURE OUTPATIENTS POPULATION

Introduction

Mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are a known cause of morbidity and mortality in heart failure (HF) patients. Maximal up–titration of guideline–directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF may not be enough to reduce the severity of the valve’s incompetence and patients’ symptoms. The development and successful results of transcatheter therapies for mitral/tricuspid disease have opened new therapeutic opportunities when surgery is not feasible. Accurate valve regurgitation’s mechanisms evaluation is essential to choose the best treatment option. This study aims at evaluating the prevalence and underlying mechanisms of at least moderate–to–severe (≥3+/4+) MR and/or TR in a cohort of HF outpatients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 1260 outpatients evaluated by our HF unit between January 2020 and June 2021. All patients with echocardiographic evidence of ≥ 3+/4+ MR and/or TR were included (treated ones were excluded), and a thorough echocardiographic images review was conducted. A full collection of patients’ clinical, laboratory and therapy regimens details was performed as well.

Results

Of the 1260 analyzed patients, 173 (13.7%) exhibited ≥3+/4+ MR and/or TR and were included in the registry. Table 1 shows the main clinical/echocardiographic characteristics. Mean age was 80±7 years, median ejection fraction was 45% (IQR=33–55). All patients were treated with maximal tolerated doses of GDMT and, if appropriate, with cardiac devices/myocardial revascularization. ≥3+/4+ MR and/or TR was observed in 92 (7.3%) and 117 (9.3%) patients, respectively. Patients with isolated significant MR were 56 (4.4%), with isolated significant TR were 81 (6.4%); the remaining 36 (2.8%) had both MR/TR. Among patients with significant MR, 50 (54%) had functional/secondary valvular defect (details in Figure 2): the majority (41,82%) presented a ventricular etiology (asymmetric tethering in 18/41) while 9 (18%) an atrial one (atriogenic tethering in 3/9).

Conclusion

Despite optimized GDMT, the prevalence of patients with hemodynamically significant valvular defects was considerably high in our HF population. This is the first registry to comprehensively detail atrioventricular valve regurgitations’ mechanisms in a wide real–life cohort of HF outpatients. Further studies are needed to identify reasons for potential undertreatment and patients who would benefit the most from percutaneous correction of their valvular defects.

P246 URINARY SODIUM–GUIDED I.V. DIURETIC THERAPY IN ACUTE HEART FAILURE: APPLICATION OF THE YALE DIURETIC PROTOCOL IN A REAL–WORLD ITALIAN SETTING

Background

Loop diuretics are the cornerstone of acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) treatment, but evidences on doses and administration modalities are still lacking. Veena S. et al have recently validated the Natriuretic Response Prediction Equation and applied it with the Yale Diuretic Protocol (YDP) in a clinical implementation cohort demonstrating its safety.

Objectives

Our purpose is to test the applicability and safety of YDP for titration of diuretic therapy in a real–world in–hospital setting, as compared to standard diuretic therapy. METHODS From 15th September 2021 patients hospitalized with ADHF, almost one sign of congestion and need of i.v. diuretics were enrolled. Patients with active bleeding, hematocrit < 21%, or on dialysis were excluded. Patients were treated with i.v. diuretic therapy guided by urinary sodium (YDP–group) or by weight changes and urinary output (control group) based on logistic in–hospital reasons.

Results

Thirty patients were included. Median age was 76.4 [IQR 68.3; 82.7] years old; median EF and glomerular filtration rate were 40% [IQR 30; 55] and 57.2 ml/min/m2 [IQR 44.9; 79.9], respectively. Nineteen (63.3%) patients were on chronic loop diuretic treatment. Ten (33.3%) patients were treated according to YDP. Main results are shown in the Table attached. YDP patients were younger (p = 0.02) and received shorter treatment with i.v. diuretics (YDP 36 [IQR 27; 48] hours, controls 48 [IQRS 38; 88] hours; p = 0.03). No differences in terms of total diuresis, weight loss at the end of i.v. diuretic therapy and length of hospitalization were shown. YDP patients experienced significant lower increase in creatinine during i.v. diuretic therapy (p = 0.02). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups, with equal hypotension rate (10%), and similar plasma levels of electrolytes at the end of i.v. diuretic therapy; YDP patients required less potassium supplementation. Reasons for i.v. diuretic therapy suspension were comparable between groups; 7 (70%) YDP patients concluded i.v. diuretic therapy for satisfactory decongestion, while only one patient because of hypotension and none because of worsening of renal function.

Conclusion

In our reality the YDP appeared to be applicable, safe and comparable to the standard i.v. diuretic therapy in terms of in–hospital outcomes. These preliminary results need to be confirmed in a larger cohort and longer term outcomes still need to be explored.

491 Short-term prognostic implications of left ventricular myocardial work indices in advanced heart failure patients treated with repetitive Levosimendan infusions

Aims

Repetitive Levosimendan treatment in advanced heart failure patients has not been investigated yet via myocardial work indices (MWI), which could more accurately detect the effects of this both inotropic and vasodilatory drug. The aims of this study were (1) to describe variations of myocardial work indices, as a consequence of repetitive Levosimendan infusions and (2) to assess the prognostic value of myocardial work parameters in these patients.

Methods and results

Fourteen patients with advanced heart failure treated with intermittent in-hospital levosimendan infusions were prospectively included. Clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic assessment were performed before and after every Levosimendan infusion. The primary endpoint was a composite of any episode of decompensated HF, urgent HF rehospitalization, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and cardiovascular death at 4–6 weeks follow-up after each planned infusion. During follow-up (mean: 150 ± 99 days) a total of 37 infusions were performed and a total of 11 cardiovascular events occurred. Global constructive work (GCW), global work efficiency (GWE), and global work index (GWI) increased after Levosimendan infusion in 62.2%, 73.0%, and 70.3% of cases, with significant differences between patients with and without outcomes [delta GCW: −7.36 mmHg% (134.12) vs. 113.81 mmHg% (204.41), P = 0.007; delta GWE: −3.27% (8.38) vs. 4.30% (5.58), P = 0.002]. Delta value of GWE showed the largest area under curve (AUC: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.64–1.00, P = 0.002) for outcome prediction with a cut-off point of 0.5%. Independent prognostic value of GWE variation was confirmed in multivariable regression models (OR: 0.825, 95% CI: 0.702–0.970, P = 0.02).

Conclusions

GWE and GCW provided incremental and independent prognostic value at short-term follow-up over traditional echocardiographic parameters. The differentiation of patients into ‘workers’, whose GWE improved after Levosimendan infusion, and ‘non-workers’, who failed to improve their GWE, permitted to identify patients at higher risk of forthcoming cardiovascular events. Monitoring these patients with MWI may have relevant clinical implications.

Single-center experience with partial support device in destination therapy for end-stage heart failure

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are considered the standard of care for end-stage heart failure (HF) patients. Despite increasing confidence in the technology, evidence data, endorsement by scientific societies and guidelines, the number of implants reached a steady state and is not increasing at the expected pace. This is most likely related to complications that are still burdening the technology and consequently excluding the most needy, ill, and fragile population. In this manuscript we are reporting a single-center experience in a very fragile, elderly and end-stage HF population, with a superficial, partial support device: the CircuLite Synergy. The patients were included in the pre-CE mark clinical study and consequently the device underwent technical adjustment during the support, based on the complications recorded. At our institution were implanted 6 patients overall: 3 patients survived to discharge and 2 survived up to 5 years. Most of the complications recorded were due to patients' frailty and overall clinical conditions. The initial experience with the CircuLite Synergy device is proving that a more "superficial" device might be more tolerable in an elderly, frail population. Partial support has proven hemodynamically efficacious and efficient in relieving heart failure symptoms, improving medical therapy tolerability, and improving quality of life. Unfortunately, the technology was not made available due to financial uncertainty and poor management, but we hope that once the concept has been proved someone will collect the legacy.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With the Agent Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon: A Real-World Multicenter Experience

BACKGROUND

The Agent paclitaxel-coated balloon is a new drug-coated balloon (DCB) with few available real-world data. Our study sought to assess the safety and efficacy of the Agent DCB during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in different coronary lesion types in a prospective registry.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients undergoing PCI with the Agent DCB at three Italian centers between September 2014 and March 2018 were included in this registry. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was defined as the composite of cardiac death, recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and target-lesion revascularization (TLR). Procedural success was also evaluated. Among the 354 patients included in the registry (450 lesions treated with 508 DCBs), Agent DCBs were used for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in 34%, small-vessel disease (SVD) in 29%, bifurcation lesions in 26%, and "stent-like result" (SLR) lesions obtained after balloon predilation in 11%. The implantation of Agent DCBs was safe and had a high DCB lesion success rate of 92%. One-year MACE rate was 5.7% in the overall population. A higher MACE rate was observed in the ISR group (8.3%) vs the SVD group (3.6%; P=.03), with a trend toward higher event rates vs both BL (3.7%; P=.09) and SLR patients (5.5%; P=.54).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Agent DCBs during PCI appears safe and effective in a large real-world registry. These results were maintained in all subgroups, with a slightly higher trend of events rates in the ISR setting, consistent with the higher-risk nature of this patient subset.

[Tips and tricks: how to do a good coronary angioplasty? Instructions for use]

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty celebrated its 40th anniversary and gained an established role thanks to its remarkable results. The progressive development of techniques and materials together with a better understanding about the pharmacological treatment of patients with coronary artery disease contributed to this success. Nowadays percutaneous treatments have become a valid alternative to coronary artery bypass graft surgery in many patients. In this article we will highlight practical "tips and tricks" to improve the performance and the results of percutaneous coronary interventions.

T2238C ANP gene variant and risk of recurrent acute coronary syndromes in an Italian cohort of ischemic heart disease patients

BACKGROUND

The role of C2238/atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) minor allele, at the T2238C ANP gene variant, as a predisposing risk factor for acute cardiovascular events, has been previously reported. We aimed at evaluating, by a retrospective approach, the long-term impact of C2238/ANP-minor allele carrier status toward the risk of recurrent acute coronary syndromes (re-ACS) in an Italian cohort of ischemic heart disease patients.

METHODS

A total of 379 patients (males = 80.5%; mean age = 62.5 ± 9.2 years) presenting with ACS were retrospectively analyzed. Mean follow-up was 5.1 ± 3.5 years (range 1-26 years). Occurrence of new episodes of unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and STE myocardial infarction over the years was recorded and compared between subjects not carrying and carrying C2238/ANP-minor allele.

RESULTS

At univariate analysis, C2238/ANP-minor allele carrier status and treatment with beta-blocker, aspirin and statin were associated with risk of re-ACS. Multivariate analysis confirmed that hypercholesterolemia (P < 0.0001) and C2238/ANP-minor allele carrier status (P < 0.05) were both significantly and independently associated with increased risk of re-ACS. Both treatments with beta-blocker and with statin were significantly associated with reduced risk of re-ACS (P = 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). Age above 55 years was associated with recurrence of ACS in C2238/ANP-minor allele carriers (hazard ratio 1.427, 95% confidence interval 1.066-1.911, P = 0.017). Kaplan-Meier curves confirmed highest risk of new events occurrence in C2238/ANP-minor allele carriers (P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results demonstrate that C2238/ANP-minor allele carrier status is an independent risk factor for ACS recurrence in an Italian cohort of ischemic heart disease patients over the long term, and they support the role of C2238/ANP-minor allele as a negative prognostic factor in coronary artery disease patients.

Blood Pressure Levels at the Time of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization and Risk of Coronary In-Stent Restenosis

BACKGROUND

High blood pressure (BP) levels expose patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) to very high risk of 10-year cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of BP levels at the time of PCI on the risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR).

METHODS

We retrospectively included 796 patients previously treated with PCI, who underwent repeated angiography for recurrent angina or reversible myocardial ischemia. Patients were stratified into either case (n = 354) and control (n = 442) groups in the presence or absence of ISR (defined as in-stent diameter stenosis ≥50%). BP levels were measured at the time of first and second procedures. Normal BP levels were defined for <140/90 mm Hg.

RESULTS

Patients with normal BP showed significantly higher ISR-free survival (Log-rank: 5.937; P = 0.015). Both systolic (HR (95% CI): 0.731 (0.590-0.906)) and systolic/diastolic BP (HR (95% CI): 0.757 (0.611-0.939)) were significantly and independently associated with lower risk of ISR at Cox-regression analysis, adjusted for potential confounding factors, including stent type and concomitant medications. Patients with ISR showed lower rates of normal systolic/diastolic BP values (166 (47%) vs. 254 (57%); P = 0.003) compared to controls. They also received higher stent number (1.40±0.74 vs. 1.24±0.51; P < 0.001) with higher stent length (24.3±15.6 vs. 21.7±13.9 mm; P = 0.012), and lower rate of drug-eluting stents (DESs) (210 (48%) vs. 139 (40%); P = 0.025) compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Normal BP at the time of PCI is associated with nearly 24% risk reduction of ISR as evaluated in a new angiography in patients with coronary artery disease.

New therapies for arterial hypertension

Arterial hypertension is the most common chronic disease in developed countries and it is the leading risk factor for stroke, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, chronic renal failure and peripheral artery disease. Its prevalence appears to be about 30-45% of the general population. Recent European guidelines estimate that up to 15-20% of the hypertensive patients are not controlled on a dual antihypertensive combination and they require three or more different antihypertensive drug classes to achieve adequate blood pressure control. The guidelines confirmed that diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are suitable for the initiation and maintenance of antihypertensive treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination therapy. Very few antihypertensive agents have reached the market over the last few years, but no new therapeutic class has really emerged. The long-term adherence to cardiovascular drugs is still low in both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. In particular, the issue of compliance is persistently high in hypertension, despite the fixed-dose combination therapy. As a consequence, a cohort of high-risk hypertensive population, represented by patients affected by refractory and resistant hypertension, can be identified. Therefore, the need of controlling BP in high-risk patients may be addressed, in part, by the development of new drugs, devices and procedures that are designed to treat hypertension and comorbidities. In this review we will comprehensively discuss the current literature on recent therapeutic advances in hypertension, including both medical therapy and interventional procedures.

A survey on blood pressure levels and hypertension control in a sample of the Italian general population

BACKGROUND

Hypertension represents a major cardiovascular risk factor with relevant consequences on morbidity and mortality in the general population. An optimal control of blood pressure (BP) is far from being achieved.

AIM

The objective of this study was to explore awareness of BP levels, prevalence of risk factors and status of hypertension control in a sample of the Italian general population.

METHODS

Subjects aged 18 years or older were enrolled on a voluntary basis during the 7th and 8th World Hypertension Days at our hospital centre, S. Andrea Hospital in Rome, and at other hospitals throughout the Italian Lazio region. Along with BP measurement, a short questionnaire was completed at the time of the interview.

RESULTS

Of 1165 individuals enrolled into the analysis, 71.7% were aware of their BP levels (82.5% among hypertensive patients). Within the whole cohort, 31.9% of subjects were under antihypertensive treatment, while the overall rate of subjects found to be hypertensive patients at our visit was 52.9% (n = 616). Among hypertensive patients taking antihypertensive drugs, 47.1% had controlled BP values with the remaining 52.9% showing uncontrolled hypertension. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 138.2 ± 20.7 mmHg and mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was 80.4 ± 11.3 mmHg in subjects receiving antihypertensive treatment. Among older hypertensive patients (71-94 years of age), only 76.9% were under treatment. Hypertensive males were more frequently treated than females in all age groups (p = 0.001). Smoking habit negatively affected efficacy of antihypertensive therapy in the age groups of 48-53 and 54-62 years (p = 0.008 and p = 0.01, respectively). Diabetic patients had higher mean SBP values than non-diabetic subjects (137.3 ± 22.1 vs 129.3 ± 18.2 mmHg, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The results of our survey strongly support the need for a continuing educational effort aimed at providing correct advertisement of healthy lifestyles and awareness of adequate BP control. Based on our observations, particular attention has to be paid to women, younger subjects, elderly subjects and diabetic patients in order to reach appropriate BP control and reduction of cardiovascular risk in these subject categories.