A Critical Analysis of Foster Youth Advisory Boards in the United States

A scoping review of youth advisory structures in the United States: Applications, outcomes, and best practices

Although youth advisory structures (YASs) have proliferated internationally to facilitate the voice of young people, little is known about the practices of such groups, especially in the United States. To address this gap of knowledge, this study describes the findings of a scoping review of scholarly research on YAS in the United States. The review found that although the use of YAS is increasing, current scholarship offers little information about YAS processes or how youth are engaged. Most YAS in the review partnered with marginalized young people to inform research and programming around sensitive health topics, such as human immunodeficiency virus prevention. Youth who participated in YAS experienced positive outcomes such as leadership and skill development, healthier decision-making, and confidence. Although most studies involved youth in minimal ways, there is a growing body of literature where youth are engaged in long-term partnerships that support positive youth development. This review details other key characteristics of YAS and provides recommendations for best practices, such as building consensus around terms used to refer to YAS and promoting the dissemination of process details around YAS facilitation.

Youth Participatory Approaches and Health Equity: Conceptualization and Integrative Review

There is an array of youth participatory approaches relevant to health equity efforts in community psychology, adolescent health, youth development, and education. While they share some commonalities, they also reflect important distinctions regarding key processes and intended level of impact. Here, we consider the following: (a) youth-led participatory action research (YPAR), (b) youth organizing (YO), (c) youth-led planning, (d) human-centered design, (e) participatory arts, and (f) youth advisory boards. Informed by community psychology theories on empowerment and levels of change and social epidemiology frameworks that focus on the social determinants of health inequities, we aim to promote greater clarity in the conceptualization, implementation, and evaluation of youth participatory approaches; frame the "landscape" of youth participatory approaches and their similarities and differences; present an integrative review of the evidence regarding the impact of youth participatory approaches; and describe several illustrative cases so as to consider more deeply how some youth participatory approaches aim to influence the social determinants of health that lead to the physical embodiment of health inequities. We conclude by identifying areas of future policy- and practice-relevant research for advancing youth participation and health equity.

Predictors of Behavioral Health Service Utilization in a Medicaid Enrolled Sample of Emerging Adults

Emerging adults (EA), individuals between the ages of 15-26, face many challenges in their transition to a new developmental stage, especially those with behavioral health concerns who do not receive the supports they need. Many EA drop out of services at 18, which is likely due in part to the need to transition to the adult service system and the lack of available transition support services in child/adolescent service systems. Though this is a clear disparity, research on EA service utilization, especially those enrolled in Medicaid and with co-occurring conditions, is rare. This paper begins to address this gap by examining variables at age 17 that predict the service utilization of continuously Medicaid enrolled EA at age 18. Data came from an administrative dataset. The sample had 4,548 EA and 53% were female, 50% identified with a minority group, and 19% were child-welfare involved. Exploratory logistic regression analyses were used. Minority EA had lower odds of utilizing services at age 18. EA involved with child welfare had greater odds of utilizing services at age 18. EA with at least one Substance Use Disorder (SUD) and at least one mental health disorder at 17 had a higher likelihood of service utilization at 18, the opposite was true for EA with only SUDs. These findings identified predictors of service utilization for an understudied sample-EA enrolled in Medicaid. Results provided preliminary evidence that EA with SUD diagnoses access behavioral health services differently than those without a SUD diagnosis, and that it is fruitful to examine subgroups of EA when seeking to understand their service utilization patterns. Identifying predictors of service utilization during the transition period from the child to the adult system can help inform systems interventions to retain EA in services.