1
|
Van Werkhoven LA, Cammareri E, Hoogeman MS, Nout RA, Milder MTW, Nuyttens JJME. Stereotactic body radiation therapy on abdominal-pelvic lymph node oligometastases: a systematic review on toxicity. Acta Oncol 2024; 63:822-832. [PMID: 39473177 PMCID: PMC11541805 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.40681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 10/05/2024] [Indexed: 11/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To review available data on toxicity during and/or after treatment of abdominal-pelvic lymph node oligometastases (A-P LN) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to provide an overview of adverse events and its relation to dose or fractionation. MATERIAL AND METHODS For this systematic review, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and CINAH for studies published between the database inception and October 3rd, 2023. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients with 1-5 A-P LN oligometastases, (2) treatment with SBRT to a median prescribed dose of ≥55 Gy BED10, and (3) description of acute and/or late toxicity. There were no language or date restrictions. RESULTS A total of 35 studies, including 1,512 patients, were selected. Late grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 0.6% and 0.1% of the patients treated for A-P LN oligometastases. All late adverse events grade ≥ 3 occurred after treatment of the tumor with a minimum BED10 of 72 Gy. Of the 11 patients with severe late toxicity, five patients were re-irradiated. Late grade 2 and 1 toxicity was reported in 3.4% and 8.3% of the patients. Acute toxicity grades 4, 3, 2, and 1 occurred in 0.1%, 0.2%, 4.4%, and 19.8% of the patients, respectively. INTERPRETATION SBRT for A-P LN oligometastases show low toxicity rates. Nearly 50% of late adverse events ≥ grade 3 were associated with re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy A Van Werkhoven
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands.
| | - Eugenio Cammareri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mischa S Hoogeman
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Remi A Nout
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike T W Milder
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| | - Joost J M E Nuyttens
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miller SR, Chang DT. Local-Regional Therapy for Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancer J 2024; 30:272-279. [PMID: 39042779 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the United States as well as a leading cause of cancer-related death. Upward of 30% of patients ultimately develop metastatic disease, most commonly to the liver and lung. Untreated, patients have poor survival. Historically, patients with oligometastatic disease were treated with resection leading to long-term survival; however, there are many patients who are not surgical candidates. Innovations in thermal ablation, hepatic artery infusions, chemoembolization and radioembolization, and stereotactic ablative radiation have led to an expansion of patients eligible for local therapy. This review examines the evidence behind each modality for the most common locations of oligometastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean R Miller
- From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mutsaers A, Li G, Fernandes J, Ali S, Barnes E, Chen H, Czarnota G, Karam I, Moore-Palhares D, Poon I, Soliman H, Vesprini D, Cheung P, Louie A. Uncovering the armpit of SBRT: An institutional experience with stereotactic radiation of axillary metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100730. [PMID: 38317679 PMCID: PMC10839264 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose/objectives The growing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic cancer has led to its use in varying anatomic locations. The objective of this study was to review our institutional SBRT experience for axillary metastases (AM), focusing on outcomes and process. Materials/methods Patients treated with SBRT to AM from 2014 to 2022 were reviewed. Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate the incidence of local failure (LF), with death as competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate regression analysis examined predictors of LF. Results We analyzed 37 patients with 39 AM who received SBRT. Patients were predominantly female (60 %) and elderly (median age: 72). Median follow-up was 14.6 months. Common primary cancers included breast (43 %), skin (19 %), and lung (14 %). Treatment indication included oligoprogression (46 %), oligometastases (35 %) and symptomatic progression (19 %). A minority had prior overlapping radiation (18 %) or surgery (11 %). Most had prior systemic therapy (70 %).Significant heterogeneity in planning technique was identified; a minority of patient received 4-D CT scans (46 %), MR-simulation (21 %), or contrast (10 %). Median dose was 40 Gy (interquartile range (IQR): 35-40) in 5 fractions, (BED10 = 72 Gy). Seventeen cases (44 %) utilized a low-dose elective volume to cover remaining axilla.At first assessment, 87 % had partial or complete response, with a single progression. Of symptomatic patients (n = 14), 57 % had complete resolution and 21 % had improvement. One and 2-year LF rate were 16 % and 20 %, respectively. Univariable analysis showed increasing BED reduced risk of LF. Median OS was 21.0 months (95 % [Confidence Interval (CI)] 17.3-not reached) and median PFS was 7.0 months (95 % [CI] 4.3-11.3). Two grade 3 events were identified, and no grade 4/5. Conclusion Using SBRT for AM demonstrated low rates of toxicity and LF, and respectable symptom improvement. Variation in treatment delivery has prompted development of an institutional protocol to standardize technique and increase efficiency. Limited followup may limit detection of local failure and late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Mutsaers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - G.J. Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - J.S. Fernandes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - S. Ali
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - E.A. Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - H. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - G.J. Czarnota
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - I. Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - D. Moore-Palhares
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - I. Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - H. Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - D. Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - P. Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - A.V. Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beckers C, Pruschy M, Vetrugno I. Tumor hypoxia and radiotherapy: A major driver of resistance even for novel radiotherapy modalities. Semin Cancer Biol 2024; 98:19-30. [PMID: 38040401 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Hypoxia in solid tumors is an important predictor of poor clinical outcome to radiotherapy. Both physicochemical and biological processes contribute to a reduced sensitivity of hypoxic tumor cells to ionizing radiation and hypoxia-related treatment resistances. A conventional low-dose fractionated radiotherapy regimen exploits iterative reoxygenation in between the individual fractions, nevertheless tumor hypoxia still remains a major hurdle for successful treatment outcome. The technological advances achieved in image guidance and highly conformal dose delivery make it nowadays possible to prescribe larger doses to the tumor as part of single high-dose or hypofractionated radiotherapy, while keeping an acceptable level of normal tissue complication in the co-irradiated organs at risk. However, we insufficiently understand the impact of tumor hypoxia to single high-doses of RT and hypofractionated RT. So-called FLASH radiotherapy, which delivers ionizing radiation at ultrahigh dose rates (> 40 Gy/sec), has recently emerged as an important breakthrough in the radiotherapy field to reduce normal tissue toxicity compared to irradiation at conventional dose rates (few Gy/min). Not surprisingly, oxygen consumption and tumor hypoxia also seem to play an intriguing role for FLASH radiotherapy. Here we will discuss the role of tumor hypoxia for radiotherapy in general and in the context of novel radiotherapy treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Beckers
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Pruschy
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Irene Vetrugno
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Caivano D, Bonome P, Pezzulla D, Rotondi M, Sigillo RC, De Sanctis V, Valeriani M, Osti MF. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of lymph node metastases: a retrospective mono-institutional study in a large cohort of patients. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1163213. [PMID: 37601675 PMCID: PMC10435736 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1163213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lymph node metastases (NMs) are a common site of tumor spread that can occur at different times of the disease. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can be a therapeutic option for the treatment of NMs in the setting of oligometastatic disease (OMD). The aim of this study was to evaluate as primary end points the local control (LC) and secondary end points the locoregional nodal control (LRNC), distant nodal control (DNC), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), and concurrently to assess the predictive factors of response. Methods This is a retrospective study that analyzes a group of patients treated with SBRT on NMs from different primary tumors, with a of maximum five metastasis. Treated lesions were divided into four groups: oligometastatics, oligorecurrents, oligoprogressives, and oligopersistents. Results From 2007 to 2021, 229 NMs were treated in 174 patients with different primary tumor. The schedule most represented was 30 Gy in five fractions. The LC was obtained in 90% of NMs treated by SBRT with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 93%, 86%, and 86%, respectively. The LRNC was reached in 84% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 88%, 83%, and 77%, respectively. The DNC was obtained in 87% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 92%, 82%, and 78%, respectively. The DMFS was obtained in 38% of cases with rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of 57%, 40%, and 30%, respectively. The rate of PFS were 44%, 23%, and 13% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The rates at 1, 3, and 5 years of OS were 78%, 48%, and 36%, respectively. Conclusion SBRT is an option for the treatment of NMS, with high rates of LC, improving survival, and with a good safety and tolerance. Tumor volume, tumor burden, lesion site, and doses can be predictive factors of response; however, multi-institutional studies with a greater number of patients could be helpful to better select patients and understand the right integrations between ablative treatment and systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donatella Caivano
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine - Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Radiotherapy, Santa Maria Goretti Hospita, Latina, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonome
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Donato Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Margherita Rotondi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Carlo Sigillo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Valeriani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Camps-Malea A, Pointreau Y, Chapet S, Calais G, Barillot I. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for mediastinal lymph node with CyberKnife®: Efficacy and toxicity. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:225-232. [PMID: 37080855 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
PUPRPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy is more and more used for treatment of oligometastatic mediastinal lymph nodes. The objective of this single-centre study was to evaluate its efficacy in patients with either a locoregional recurrence of a pulmonary or oesophageal cancer or with distant metastases of extrathoracic tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with oligometastatic mediastinal lymph nodes treated with CyberKnife from June 2010 to September 2020 were screened. The primary endpoint was to assess local progression free survival and induced toxicity. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and progression free survival. The delay before introduction of systemic treatment in the subgroup of patients who did not receive systemic therapy for previous progression was also evaluated. RESULTS Fifty patients were included: 15 with a locoregional progression of a thoracic primary tumour (87% pulmonary) and 35 with mediastinal metastasis of especially renal tumour (29%). Median follow-up was 27 months (6-110 months). Local progression free survival at 6, 12 and 18 months was respectively 94, 88 and 72%. The rate of local progression was significantly lower in patients who received 36Gy in six fractions (66% of the cohort) versus other treatment schemes. Two grade 1 acute oesophagitis and one late grade 2 pulmonary fibrosis were described. Overall survival at 12, 18 and 24 months was respectively 94, 85 and 82%. Median progression free survival was 13 months. Twenty-one patients were treated by stereotactic body irradiation alone without previous history of systemic treatment. Among this subgroup, 11 patients (52%) received a systemic treatment following stereotactic body radiotherapy with a median introduction time of 17 months (5-52 months) and 24% did not progress. CONCLUSION Stereotactic body irradiation as treatment of oligometastatic mediastinal lymph nodes is a well-tolerated targeted irradiation that leads to a high control rate and delay the introduction of systemic therapy in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Camps-Malea
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Henry-S-Kaplan, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France.
| | - Y Pointreau
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Henry-S-Kaplan, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France; Institut Inter-régional de cancérologie, centre Jean-Bernard, clinique Victor-Hugo, Le Mans, France
| | - S Chapet
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Henry-S-Kaplan, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - G Calais
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Henry-S-Kaplan, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France
| | - I Barillot
- Service de radiothérapie, centre Henry-S-Kaplan, CHRU Bretonneau, Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fujiwara M, Kitada F. Clinical Experience of Intra-tumoral Central-Dose Escalated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Advanced Cancer. Cureus 2023; 15:e34995. [PMID: 36938256 PMCID: PMC10020031 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Lymph node metastases (LN mets) are radioresistant, and high-dose irradiation is preferred for their control. The volumetric-modulated arc therapy technique makes it possible to perform intra-tumoral dose escalation without increasing the total prescribed dose of fractionated irradiation. We report its clinical experiences with intra-tumoral central-dose escalated volumetric-modulated arc therapy (ICE-VMAT) for LN mets. Materials and methods This study retrospectively evaluated 31 patients with 50 LN mets from stage III and IV advanced cancers who received ICE-VMAT. The total described dose was 50 Gy, and the median intra-tumoral central dose was 66 Gy (range, 54-79 Gy). Results The median follow-up period was 21 months. The two-year local control and overall survival (OS) rates were 95% and 56%, whereas univariate analysis revealed that the KPS ≥ 80 group had a significantly better OS compared to the KPS < 80 group. Conclusion ICE-VMAT was effective for LN mets. Patients with good KPS may benefit from therapeutic intervention with ICE-VMAT, even if they have multiple distant LN mets.
Collapse
|
8
|
Snyder J, Smith B, St-Aubin J, Dunkerley D, Shepard A, Caster J, Hyer D. Intra-fraction motion of pelvic oligometastases and feasibility of PTV margin reduction using MRI guided adaptive radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1098593. [PMID: 37152034 PMCID: PMC10154517 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1098593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study assesses the impact of intra-fraction motion and PTV margin size on target coverage for patients undergoing radiation treatment of pelvic oligometastases. Dosimetric sparing of the bowel as a function of the PTV margin is also evaluated. Materials and methods Seven patients with pelvic oligometastases previously treated on our MR-linac (35 Gy in 5 fractions) were included in this study. Retrospective adaptive plans were created for each fraction on the daily MRI datasets using PTV margins of 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm. Dosimetric constraint violations and GTV coverage were measured as a function of PTV margin size. The impact of intra-fraction motion on GTV coverage was assessed by tracking the GTV position on the cine MR images acquired during treatment delivery and creating an intra-fraction dose distribution for each IMRT beam. The intra-fraction dose was accumulated for each fraction to determine the total dose delivered to the target for each PTV size. Results All OAR constraints were achieved in 85.7%, 94.3%, and 100.0% of fractions when using 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm PTV margins while scaling to 95% PTV coverage. Compared to plans with a 5 mm PTV margin, there was a 27.4 ± 12.3% (4.0 ± 2.2 Gy) and an 18.5 ± 7.3% (2.7 ± 1.4 Gy) reduction in the bowel D0.5cc dose for 2 mm and 3 mm PTV margins, respectively. The target dose (GTV V35 Gy) was on average 100.0 ± 0.1% (99.6 - 100%), 99.6 ± 1.0% (97.2 - 100%), and 99.0 ± 1.4% (95.0 - 100%), among all fractions for the 5 mm, 3 mm, and 2 mm PTV margins on the adaptive plans when accounting for intra-fraction motion, respectively. Conclusion A 2 mm PTV margin achieved a minimum of 95% GTV coverage while reducing the dose to the bowel for all patients.
Collapse
|
9
|
Medici F, Siepe G, Strigari L, Massari F, Buwenge M, Bisello S, Castellucci P, Fanti S, Cammelli S, Morganti A. CARE‑compliant stereotactic radiotherapy of urothelial nodal metastases: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2022; 16:85. [PMID: 35251636 PMCID: PMC8892461 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2022.2518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to report the case of a 58-year-old male patient with ureteral carcinoma who underwent ureteroileostomy treatment. At 2 years following surgery, six lymph node metastases (LNMs) were detected in the patient's para-aortic and pelvic regions using 18F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. All LNMs were treated using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT; 35-40 Gy/5 fractions). At 3 months after radiotherapy, 18F-FDG-PET/CT examination revealed a complete radiological and metabolic response of all targeted treatment sites in the patient. In the 2 years following radiotherapy, another three same-dose SBRT treatments were performed on single or multiple LNMs, which were all detected in the abdomen and pelvis of the patient. Overall, a total of 11 LNMs were targeted in the patient and all exhibited complete radiological and metabolic response following treatment. The only treatment side effect reported by the patient was a slight and temporary loss of appetite. In patients with lymph node oligometastases there are two options for radiotherapy: i) Irradiation focusing on LNMs alone; and ii) prophylactic irradiation of the entire lymph node area combined with a boost on macroscopic lesions. In the patient discussed in the present study, the choice of irradiation focusing on LNMs alone made it possible to postpone systemic therapies and instead use an optimally tolerated treatment. The treatment outcome in this patient indicated that there was no radioresistance of urothelial LNMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Medici
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giambattista Siepe
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero‑Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Lidia Strigari
- Medical Physics Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero‑Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero‑Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Bisello
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero‑Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero‑Universitaria di Bologna, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Portelance L, Corradini S, Erickson B, Lalondrelle S, Padgett K, van der Leij F, van Lier A, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I. Online Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy (oMRgRT) for Gynecological Cancers. Front Oncol 2021; 11:628131. [PMID: 34513656 PMCID: PMC8429611 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is increasingly being used in gynecological cancer management. RT delivered with curative or palliative intent can be administered alone or combined with chemotherapy or surgery. Advanced treatment planning and delivery techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, including volumetric modulated arc therapy, and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy allow for highly conformal radiation dose delivery leading to improved tumor control rates and less treatment toxicity. Quality on-board imaging that provides accurate visualization of target and surrounding organs at risk is a critical feature of these advanced techniques. As soft tissue contrast resolution is superior with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to other imaging modalities, MRI has been used increasingly to delineate tumor from adjacent soft tissues and organs at risk from initial diagnosis to tumor response evaluation. Gynecological cancers often have poor contrast resolution compared to the surrounding tissues on computed tomography scan, and consequently the benefit of MRI is high. One example is in management of locally advanced cervix cancer where adaptive MRI guidance has been broadly implemented for adaptive brachytherapy. The role of MRI for external beam RT is also steadily increasing. MRI information is being used for treatment planning, predicting, and monitoring position shifts and accounting for tissue deformation and target regression during treatment. The recent clinical introduction of online MRI-guided radiation therapy (oMRgRT) could be the next step in high-precision RT. This technology provides a tool to take full advantage of MRI not only at the time of initial treatment planning but as well as for daily position verification and online plan adaptation. Cervical, endometrial, vaginal, and oligometastatic ovarian cancers are being treated on MRI linear accelerator systems throughout the world. This review summarizes the current state, early experience, ongoing trials, and future directions of oMRgRT in the management of gynecological cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine Portelance
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Department, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Beth Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Susan Lalondrelle
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kyle Padgett
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Department, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Femke van der Leij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Astrid van Lier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ina Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mangaj A, Chopra S, Nout RA. Defining the role of high-dose radiation in oligometastatic & oligorecurrent cervical cancer. Indian J Med Res 2021; 154:303-318. [PMID: 35295014 PMCID: PMC9131772 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_298_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Around 5-8 per cent of women diagnosed with cervical cancer present with metastatic disease at presentation and 16-25 per cent of patients fail at either within irradiated fields or at distant sites post-curative therapy in advanced cervical cancers. Conventionally, chemotherapy with palliative intent constituted the mainstay of treatment with modest survival outcomes and radiation therapy was reserved for symptomatic benefit only. While targeted therapies and immunotherapy have been added in therapeutic armamentarium, the impact on the outcomes is modest. In limited metastatic disease, radiation therapy to metastatic sites from different primary cancers has shown survival benefits; however, the data are scarce in cervical cancer. With a better understanding of the molecular biology of the metastases and recurrence pattern, emphasis is laid upon total eradication of the disease rather than offering relief from symptoms. This article summarizes the role of radiation therapy in limited metastatic disease and recurrent cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay Mangaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India,For correspondence: Dr Supriya Chopra, Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400 012, Maharashtra, India. e-mail:
| | - Remi A. Nout
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Autrusseau PA, Cazzato RL, Koch G, Ramamurthy N, Auloge P, De Marini P, Lipsker D, Gangi A, Garnon J. Freezing Nodal Disease: Local Control Following Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of Locoregional and Distant Lymph Node Oligometastases: A 10-Year, Single-Center Experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2021; 32:1435-1444. [PMID: 34271190 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To retrospectively assess the technical feasibility, safety, and oncologic outcomes of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation (PCA) of locoregional and distant lymph node metastases (LNMs). METHODS All consecutive patients undergoing PCA of LNMs between February 2009 and December 2019 were identified using a retrospective database search. Every patient was followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and at approximately 3-6-month intervals using computed tomography or positron emission tomography-computed tomography. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local tumor progression-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Locoregional and distant groups were compared using the Fisher test. Technical success, technique efficacy, complications, and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Fifty-six metachronous oligometastatic LNMs (median size, 15 mm [interquartile range, 13-15 mm; range, 9-36 mm]) were treated in 37 sessions in 29 patients and defined as locoregional (26/37 sessions) or distant (11/37 sessions). Seventeen patients had undergone prior surgery or radiotherapy. Six patients underwent 8 retreatments for locoregional progression. An additional visceral oligometastasis was treated in 4 of the 11 distant LNM PCA sessions. The technical success and primary technique efficacy rates were 100%. The complication rate was 5.4% (2 transient nerve palsies). At a median follow-up of 23 months, there were 2 instances of local tumor progression (5.6%); the 1-, 2-, and 3-year local tumor progression-free survival was 100%, 94.3%, and 94.3%, respectively. Thirteen (45%) patients demonstrated no disease progression. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival was 96.2%, 90.5%, and 70%, respectively. The patients were free from systemic oncologic therapy following 20 (54%) sessions, with a mean treatment break of 19.1 months. CONCLUSIONS The PCA of lymph node oligometastases is feasible and safe, and offers promising local tumor control at midterm follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Alexis Autrusseau
- Service d'Imagerie Interventionnelle, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Roberto Luigi Cazzato
- Service d'Imagerie Interventionnelle, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Guillaume Koch
- Service d'Imagerie Interventionnelle, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nitin Ramamurthy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Monklands, NHS Lanarkshire, Airdrie, United Kingdom
| | - Pierre Auloge
- Service d'Imagerie Interventionnelle, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Pierre De Marini
- Service d'Imagerie Interventionnelle, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Dan Lipsker
- Service de dermatologie et d'oncodermatologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Afshin Gangi
- Service d'Imagerie Interventionnelle, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Julien Garnon
- Service d'Imagerie Interventionnelle, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Burkon P, Selingerova I, Slavik M, Pospisil P, Bobek L, Kominek L, Osmera P, Prochazka T, Vrzal M, Kazda T, Slampa P. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lymph Node Oligometastases: Real-World Evidence From 90 Consecutive Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 10:616494. [PMID: 33614499 PMCID: PMC7892582 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.616494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of oligometastatic lymph node involvement in the mediastinum, retroperitoneum, or pelvis, in a consecutive group of patients from real clinical practice outside clinical trials. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 90 patients with a maximum of four oligometastases and various primary tumors (the most common being colorectal cancers). The endpoints were local control of treated metastases (LC), freedom from widespread dissemination (FFWD), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and freedom from systemic treatment (FFST). Acute and delayed toxicities were also evaluated. RESULTS The median follow-up after SBRT was 34.9 months. The LC rate at three and five years was 68.4 and 56.3%, respectively. The observed median FFWD was 14.6 months, with a five-year FFWD rate of 33.7%. The median PFS was 9.4 months; the three-year PFS rate was 19.8%. The median FFST was 14.0 months; the five-year FFST rate was 23.5%. The OS rate at three and five years was 61.8 and 39.3%, respectively. Median OS was 53.1 months. The initial dissemination significantly shortened the time to relapse, death, or activation of systemic treatment-LC (HR 4.8, p < 0.001), FFWD (HR 2.8, p = 0.001), PFS (HR 2.1, p = 0.011), FFST (HR 2.4, p = 0.005), OS (HR 2.2, p = 0.034). Patients classified as having radioresistant tumors noticed significantly higher risk in terms of LC (HR 13.8, p = 0.010), FFWD (HR 3.1, p = 0.006), PFS (HR 3.5, p < 0.001), FFST (HR 3.2, p = 0.003). The multivariable analysis detected statistically significantly worse survival outcomes for initially disseminated patients as well as separately in groups divided according to radiosensitivity. No grade III or IV toxicity was reported. CONCLUSION Our study shows that targeted SBRT is a very effective and low toxic treatment for oligometastatic lymph node involvement. It can delay the indication of cytotoxic chemotherapy and thus improve and maintain patient quality of life. The aim of further studies should focus on identifying patients who benefit most from SBRT, as well as the correct timing and dosage of SBRT in treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petr Burkon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Iveta Selingerova
- Research Center for Applied Molecular Oncology (RECAMO), Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
| | - Marek Slavik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Petr Pospisil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Lukas Bobek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
| | - Libor Kominek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
| | - Pavel Osmera
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
| | - Tomas Prochazka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Miroslav Vrzal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
| | - Tomas Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
- Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| | - Pavel Slampa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czechia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Systematic review of stereotactic body radiotherapy for nodal metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis 2021; 38:11-29. [PMID: 33452954 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-020-10071-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this analysis was to assess the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in terms of local control (LC) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with lymph node metastases (NMs) from solid tumors. A systematic literature search from the earliest date to July 25th, 2019 was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Papers reporting LC and/or PFS of NMs using SBRT (< 10 fractions) were selected. The clinical outcomes rates were pooled by means of a random or fixed-effect model. Twenty-nine studies were eligible (969 patients: 938 (LC) and 698 (PFS)). LC and PFS results were reported in 28 and 18 papers, respectively. Heterogeneity was observed in terms of patient and treatment characteristics. Pooled 2-year LC reported in 11 studies was 79.3% (95%CI, 72.8%-85.7%) with substantial heterogeneity between studies (Q2 test: p = 0.0083; I2 = 57.9%), while pooled 2-year PFS reported in 8 studies was 35.9% (95%CI, 22.1%-49.7%) with very high heterogeneity between studies (Q2 test: p < 0.0001; I2 = 86.1%). Grade ≥ 3 and Grade 5 toxicity rates were 2.0% and 0.2%, respectively. SBRT of NMs seems to be safe and effective in terms of LC. However, due to the marked heterogeneity of the included series, prospective studies are required.
Collapse
|
15
|
Recursive Partitioning Analysis for Local Control Achieved With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Liver, Spine, or Lymph Nodes. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 6:100612. [PMID: 34195484 PMCID: PMC8233465 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to develop a local control risk stratification using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) for patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for metastatic cancer. Methods and Materials A single institutional database of 397 SBRT treatments to the liver, spine, and lymph nodes was constructed. All treatments required imaging follow-up to assess for local control. Cox proportional hazards analysis was implemented before the decision tree analysis. The data were split into training (70%), validation (10%), and testing (20%) sets for RPA to optimize the training set. Results In the study, 361 treatments were included in the local control analysis. Two-year local control was 71%. A decision tree analysis was used and the resulting model demonstrated 93.10% fidelity for the validation set and 87.67% for the test set. RPA class 3 was composed of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) primary tumors and treatment targets other than the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spines. RPA class 2 included patients with primary cancers other than NSCLC or breast and treatments targets of the sacral spine or liver. RPA class 1 consisted of all other patients (including lymph node targets and patients with primary breast cancer). Classes 3, 2, and 1 demonstrated 3-year local controls rates of 29%, 50%, and 83%, respectively. On subgroup analysis using the Kaplan-Meier method, treatments for lymph nodes and primary ovarian disease demonstrated improved local control relative to other treatment targets (P < .005) and primary disease sites (P < .005), respectively. Conclusions A local control risk stratification model for SBRT to sites of metastatic disease was developed. Treatment target and primary tumor were identified as critical factors determining local control. NSCLC primary lesions have increased local failure for targets other than the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spines, and improved local control was identified for lymph node sites and breast or ovarian primary tumors.
Collapse
|
16
|
Chopra S, Mangaj A, Sharma A, Tan LT, Sturdza A, Jürgenliemk-Schulz I, Han K, Huang F, Schmid MP, Fokdal L, Chargari C, Diendorfer T, Tanderup K, Potter R, Nout RA. Management of oligo-metastatic and oligo-recurrent cervical cancer: A pattern of care survey within the EMBRACE research network. Radiother Oncol 2020; 155:151-159. [PMID: 33144247 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer, systemic chemotherapy constitutes the main treatment. Though there is an increasing use of high dose external radiation and brachytherapy in the metastatic setting, no consensus exists. METHODS A 17-item survey was designed with additional case-based questions to explore present management of oligo-metastatic and oligo-recurrent cervix cancer within EMBRACE research group participating sites. The questions were designed to elicit prevailing practices in the management of de-novo oligo-metastasis and oligo-recurrent setting after completing the primary treatment of cervix cancer. The survey was sent electronically with two rounds of email reminders to respond over a 2-week survey period. The online survey was designed such that it was mandatory to complete all questions. The responses were recorded and results were summarized as proportions and summary statistics were generated. RESULTS Twenty-two centers responded to this survey. A majority (90%) of respondents reported a low incidence of de-novo oligo-metastatic cervical cancer in their practice (<5%), with a higher proportion of patients with oligo-recurrence after completing primary treatment (5-10%). All responding sites preferred to treat pelvic disease in the de-novo oligo-metastatic setting albeit with different fractionation regimens. While 68.2% of respondents recommended chemo-radiation and brachytherapy, 31.8% considered additional systemic therapy. Overall 77.3% centers recommended the use of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy to oligo-metastasis. For out-of-field nodal recurrences, 63.7% of respondents considered treating with curative intent, while 59% preferred treating in-field recurrence with palliative intent. A vast majority of the participating centers (90%) have stereotactic radiation therapy capacity and would consider a clinical trial addressing oligo-metastatic and oligo-recurrent cervical cancer. CONCLUSION Although contemporary practice is variable, a substantial proportion of EMBRACE centers consider high dose radiation in de-novo metastatic and oligo-recurrence settings. However, there is clear need for a joint clinical protocol and prospective studies to address the role of high dose radiation within oligo-recurrent and oligo-metastatic scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Chopra
- Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi Mumbai, India.
| | - Akshay Mangaj
- Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Alisha Sharma
- Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Li Tee Tan
- Cambridge University Addenbrooke's Hospital, United Kingdom
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Medical University/General Hospital of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Austria
| | | | - Kathy Han
- University of Toronto Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Fleur Huang
- Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Department of Oncology, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Maximilian P Schmid
- Medical University/General Hospital of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Austria
| | - Lars Fokdal
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Tamara Diendorfer
- Medical University/General Hospital of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Austria
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Richard Potter
- Medical University/General Hospital of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Austria
| | - Remi A Nout
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Reshko LB, Richardson MK, Spencer K, Kersh CR. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in Pelvic Lymph Node Oligometastases. Cancer Invest 2020; 38:599-607. [PMID: 32715780 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2020.1801713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in achieving durable local control and palliation of pain in pelvic lymph node oligometastatic disease is not well-studied. We performed a retrospective analysis of 30 patients with 43 pelvic lymph node oligometastases from various primary cancers all but one with non-prostate primaries treated at our institution with SBRT. The median follow-up time was 21 months. The median SBRT dose was 24 Gy in four fractions. The one-, two-, and five-year local control was 74%, 71%, and 70% and one-, two-, and five-year overall survival was 70%, 47%, and 31%. Toxicities were mild with no grade 3 or higher.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonid B Reshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Martin K Richardson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Riverside Regional Medical Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA
| | - Kelly Spencer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Riverside Regional Medical Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA
| | - Charles R Kersh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Riverside Regional Medical Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Winkel D, Werensteijn-Honingh AM, Eppinga WSC, Intven MPW, Hes J, Snoeren LMW, Visser SA, Bol GH, Raaymakers BW, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Kroon PS. Dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionation for SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac. Radiother Oncol 2020; 154:243-248. [PMID: 32949691 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE At our department, MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using the 1.5T MR-linac system (Unity, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) has been initiated for patients with lymph node oligometastases. Superior soft tissue contrast and the possibility for online plan adaptation on the Unity may allow for hypofractionated treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric feasibility and compare the plan quality of different hypofractionated schemes. METHODS AND MATERIALS Data was used from 12 patients with single lymph node oligometastases (10 pelvic, 2 para-aortic), which were all treated on the Unity with a prescribed dose of 5x7 Gy to 95% of the PTV. Hypofractionation was investigated for 3x10 Gy and 1x20 Gy schemes (all 60 Gy BED α/β = 10). The pre-treatment plans were evaluated based on dose criteria and plan quality. If all criteria were met, the number of online adapted plans which also met all dose criteria was investigated. For pre-treatment plans meeting the criteria for all three fractionation schemes, the plan quality after online adaptation was compared using the four parameters described in the NRG-BR001 phase 1 trial. RESULTS Pre-treatment plans met all clinical criteria for the three different fractionation schemes in 10, 9 and 6 cases. 50/50, 45/45 17/30 of the corresponding online adapted plans met all criteria, respectively. Violations were primarily caused by surrounding organs at risk overlapping or adjacent to the PTV. The 1x20 Gy treatment plans were, in general, of lesser quality than the 5x7 Gy and 3x10 Gy plans. CONCLUSION Hypofractionated radiotherapy for lymph node oligometastases on the 1.5T MR-linac is feasible based on dose criteria and plan quality metrics. The location of the target relative to critical structures should be considered in choosing the most suitable fractionation scheme. Especially for single fraction treatment, meeting all dose criteria in the pre-treatment situation does not guarantee that this also applies during online treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Winkel
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Wietse S C Eppinga
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jochem Hes
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Louk M W Snoeren
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne A Visser
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gijsbert H Bol
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W Raaymakers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Petra S Kroon
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Reddy AV, Mills MN, Reshko LB, Martin Richardson K, Kersh CR. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Uterine Cancer: Clinical Outcomes and Toxicity. Cancer Invest 2020; 38:522-530. [PMID: 32870714 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2020.1817483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
We report on clinical outcomes in patients with oligometastatic uterine cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Twenty-seven patients with 61 lesions were treated with SBRT. Median follow-up was 16.9 months. Local control was achieved in 49/61 (80.3%) lesions. One-year local-progression-free survival and overall survival were 75.9% and 65.4%. Lesions with favorable response were smaller than lesions with unfavorable response (p = .007). Liver lesions were less likely to achieve favorable response (p = .0128). There were no grade 3 or 4 events. Treatment with SBRT can provide excellent local control in oligometastatic uterine cancer with minimal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhinav V Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew N Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Leonid B Reshko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - K Martin Richardson
- Riverside and University of Virginia Radiosurgery Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA
| | - Charles R Kersh
- Riverside and University of Virginia Radiosurgery Center, Newport News, Virginia, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Franzese C, Badalamenti M, Comito T, Franceschini D, Clerici E, Navarria P, Loi M, D'agostino G, Baldaccini D, Chiola I, Reggiori G, Mancosu P, Tomatis S, Scorsetti M. Assessing the role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in a large cohort of patients with lymph node oligometastases: Does it affect systemic treatment’s intensification? Radiother Oncol 2020; 150:184-190. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
21
|
Defining oligometastatic disease from a radiation oncology perspective: An ESTRO-ASTRO consensus document. Radiother Oncol 2020; 148:157-166. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 182] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
22
|
Shahi J, Peng J, Donovan E, Vansantvoort J, Wong R, Tsakiridis T, Quan K, Parpia S, Swaminath A. Overall and chemotherapy-free survival following stereotactic body radiation therapy for abdominopelvic oligometastases. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64:563-569. [PMID: 32497405 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Limited data establish the efficacy and safety of SBRT in the abdominopelvic (AP) space, where SBRT delivery is challenging due to the proximity of radiosensitive luminal gastrointestinal (GI) organs. The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients with AP OM treated with SBRT. METHODS Eligible patients were those with OM (defined as metastases in ≤3 total sites) in the AP space (excluding liver) treated with SBRT. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier estimates of (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and chemotherapy-free survival (CFS) were performed. RESULTS Fifty-one patients with 58 AP OM received SBRT between 2011 and 2015. Median follow-up was 21.9 months. All SBRT treatments were delivered in 5 fractions with a median dose of 35 Gy (25-40 Gy). Progression post-SBRT occurred in 38/51 patients (75%), with a median PFS of 4.9 months (95% CI: 2.5-7.5), and 2-year PFS of 29%. Rates of 2-and 4-year LC were 74% and 69%, respectively. Median OS was 42.6 months (95% CI: 31-55). Oligometastatic progression occurred in 21/38 patients, and of those, 48% (10/21) received further SBRT. Resulting 2- and 4-year CFS were 47% and 37%, respectively (median 15.1 months). Nineteen patients (37%) experienced a grade 1 or 2 acute toxicity. One grade 3 (acute) toxicity was observed. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were detected. CONCLUSIONS SBRT to AP OM was associated with sustained LC, excellent OS and minimal toxicity. The use of SBRT allowed for prolonged CFS and the salvage of limited-burden distant failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeevin Shahi
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University/Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Peng
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University/Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elysia Donovan
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University/Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jasmin Vansantvoort
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University/Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Raimond Wong
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University/Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Theodoros Tsakiridis
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University/Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kimmen Quan
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University/Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sameer Parpia
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University/Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stereobody radiotherapy for nodal recurrences in oligometastatic patients: a pooled analysis from two phase I clinical trials. Clin Exp Metastasis 2020; 37:519-529. [PMID: 32495238 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-020-10039-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to achieve high local control rates in limited metastatic burden of disease. Few papers reported on the efficacy of SBRT in nodal oligometastases. The primary aim of the present paper was to analyze the treatment outcome in this setting. Data from DESTROY-1 and SRS-DESTROY-2 phase I clinical trials were reviewed and analyzed. These trials were based on a 5 fractions and a single fraction regimens, respectively. End-points of this analysis were toxicity rates, overall response rate (ORR), and local control (LC). Patients treated between December 2003 and January 2018, with any metastatic site, and primary tumor type and histology were included. One hundred-eighty-one patients (M/F: 93/88; median age: 67, range 37-88) treated with SBRT on 253 nodal lesions were analyzed. Initially, the used technique was 3D-CRT (20.9%), while subsequently treatments were delivered by VMAT (79.1%). The total dose to the PTV ranged between 12 Gy/single fraction to 50 Gy/5 fractions. With a median follow-up of 21 months (2-124), no grade 3 acute or late toxicity was recorded. ORR based on functional imaging was 92.5% with a complete response rate of 76%. Two- and three-year actuarial LC were 81.6% and 76.0%, respectively. Our large pooled analysis confirms the efficacy and safety of SBRT/SRS in patients with nodal metastases and identifies clinical and treatment variables able to predict complete response and local control rate.
Collapse
|
24
|
Makhlin I, Fox K. Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: Is This a Curable Entity? A Contemporary Review of the Literature. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22:15. [PMID: 32025905 PMCID: PMC7219961 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-020-0867-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) remains a poorly understood entity for which no standard of care exists at this time. This review will focus on our biologic understanding of OMBC and provide an update on current treatment strategies. RECENT FINDINGS The introduction of micro RNA expression profiling has advanced our understanding of the biologic underpinnings of OMBC. Although most of the data regarding treatment have come from retrospective studies, there are now prospective randomized trials reporting progression-free survival and overall survival improvements with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Ongoing studies designed to evaluate addition of SABR as well as other novel agents will further develop this field and provide new treatment options. A "cure" for OMBC remains elusive. With further basic research coupled with novel prospective trials, patients will hopefully enjoy increased progression-free survival and overall survival, and ideally a delay to more toxic systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Makhlin
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kevin Fox
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Corradini S, Alongi F, Andratschke N, Belka C, Boldrini L, Cellini F, Debus J, Guckenberger M, Hörner-Rieber J, Lagerwaard FJ, Mazzola R, Palacios MA, Philippens MEP, Raaijmakers CPJ, Terhaard CHJ, Valentini V, Niyazi M. MR-guidance in clinical reality: current treatment challenges and future perspectives. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:92. [PMID: 31167658 PMCID: PMC6551911 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1308-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) marks the beginning of a new era. MR is a versatile and suitable imaging modality for radiotherapy, as it enables direct visualization of the tumor and the surrounding organs at risk. Moreover, MRgRT provides real-time imaging to characterize and eventually track anatomical motion. Nevertheless, the successful translation of new technologies into clinical practice remains challenging. To date, the initial availability of next-generation hybrid MR-linac (MRL) systems is still limited and therefore, the focus of the present preview was on the initial applicability in current clinical practice and on future perspectives of this new technology for different treatment sites.MRgRT can be considered a groundbreaking new technology that is capable of creating new perspectives towards an individualized, patient-oriented planning and treatment approach, especially due to the ability to use daily online adaptation strategies. Furthermore, MRL systems overcome the limitations of conventional image-guided radiotherapy, especially in soft tissue, where target and organs at risk need accurate definition. Nevertheless, some concerns remain regarding the additional time needed to re-optimize dose distributions online, the reliability of the gating and tracking procedures and the interpretation of functional MR imaging markers and their potential changes during the course of treatment. Due to its continuous technological improvement and rapid clinical large-scale application in several anatomical settings, further studies may confirm the potential disruptive role of MRgRT in the evolving oncological environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - F. Alongi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - N. Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C. Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - L. Boldrini
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - F. Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - J. Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J. Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F. J. Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Mazzola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M. A. Palacios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. E. P. Philippens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C. P. J. Raaijmakers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C. H. J. Terhaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V. Valentini
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - M. Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Winkel D, Bol GH, Werensteijn-Honingh AM, Kiekebosch IH, van Asselen B, Intven MP, Eppinga WS, Raaymakers BW, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Kroon PS. Evaluation of plan adaptation strategies for stereotactic radiotherapy of lymph node oligometastases using online magnetic resonance image guidance. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:58-64. [PMID: 33458426 PMCID: PMC7807584 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recent studies have shown that the use of magnetic resonance (MR) guided online plan adaptation yields beneficial dosimetric values and reduces unplanned violations of the dose constraints for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of lymph node oligometastases. The purpose of this R-IDEAL stage 0 study was to determine the optimal plan adaptation approach for MR-guided SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) and repeated MR data from five patients with in total 17 pathological lymph nodes, six different methods of plan adaptation were performed on the daily MRI and contours. To determine the optimal plan adaptation approach for treatment of lymph node oligometastases, the adapted plans were evaluated using clinical dose criteria and the time required for performing the plan adaptation. RESULTS The average time needed for the different plan adaptation methods ranged between 11 and 119 s. More advanced adaptation methods resulted in more plans that met the clinical dose criteria [range, 0-16 out of 17 plans]. The results show a large difference between target coverage achieved by the different plan adaptation methods. CONCLUSION Results suggested that multiple plan adaptation methods, based on plan adaptation on the daily anatomy, were feasible for MR-guided SBRT treatment of lymph node oligometastases. The most advanced method, in which a full online replanning was performed by segment shape and weight optimization after fluence optimization, yielded the most favourable dosimetric values and could be performed within a time-frame acceptable (<5 min) for MR-guided treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Winkel
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Gijsbert H. Bol
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ilse H. Kiekebosch
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bram van Asselen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn P.W. Intven
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Wietse S.C. Eppinga
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bas W. Raaymakers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Petra S. Kroon
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|