Uncovering the armpit of SBRT: An institutional experience with stereotactic radiation of axillary metastases

Purpose/objectives

The growing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic cancer has led to its use in varying anatomic locations. The objective of this study was to review our institutional SBRT experience for axillary metastases (AM), focusing on outcomes and process.

Materials/methods

Patients treated with SBRT to AM from 2014 to 2022 were reviewed. Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate the incidence of local failure (LF), with death as competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate regression analysis examined predictors of LF.

Results

We analyzed 37 patients with 39 AM who received SBRT. Patients were predominantly female (60 %) and elderly (median age: 72). Median follow-up was 14.6 months. Common primary cancers included breast (43 %), skin (19 %), and lung (14 %). Treatment indication included oligoprogression (46 %), oligometastases (35 %) and symptomatic progression (19 %). A minority had prior overlapping radiation (18 %) or surgery (11 %). Most had prior systemic therapy (70 %).Significant heterogeneity in planning technique was identified; a minority of patient received 4-D CT scans (46 %), MR-simulation (21 %), or contrast (10 %). Median dose was 40 Gy (interquartile range (IQR): 35-40) in 5 fractions, (BED10 = 72 Gy). Seventeen cases (44 %) utilized a low-dose elective volume to cover remaining axilla.At first assessment, 87 % had partial or complete response, with a single progression. Of symptomatic patients (n = 14), 57 % had complete resolution and 21 % had improvement. One and 2-year LF rate were 16 % and 20 %, respectively. Univariable analysis showed increasing BED reduced risk of LF. Median OS was 21.0 months (95 % [Confidence Interval (CI)] 17.3-not reached) and median PFS was 7.0 months (95 % [CI] 4.3-11.3). Two grade 3 events were identified, and no grade 4/5.

Conclusion

Using SBRT for AM demonstrated low rates of toxicity and LF, and respectable symptom improvement. Variation in treatment delivery has prompted development of an institutional protocol to standardize technique and increase efficiency. Limited followup may limit detection of local failure and late toxicity.

Uncovering the Armpit of Axillary SBRT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The growing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic cancer has led to applications in new and unique anatomic locations, highlighting the importance of effective, safe, reproducible treatment delivery. The objective of this study was to review our institutional SBRT experience for axillary metastases (AM), focusing on outcomes, safety and process.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In this ethics approved single-institution retrospective review, patients treated with SBRT to AM from 2014-2022 had tumor, treatment planning, and dosimetric variables abstracted. Toxicity was assessed per Common Terminology for Adverse Events V5.0. Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate the incidence of local failure (LF), with death as competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We analyzed 37 patients with 39 AM who received SBRT. Patients were predominantly female (60%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 (62%), and elderly (median age: 72), with a median follow-up of 14.6 months. Common primary sites included breast (n = 16, 43%), skin (n = 7, 19%), and lung (n = 5, 14%). Treatment indication included oligoprogression (n = 18, 46%), oligometastases (n = 14, 36%) and symptomatic progression (n = 7, 18%). A minority had prior overlapping radiation (n = 7, 18%) or regional surgery (n = 4, 11%), while most had prior systemic therapy (n = 26, 70%). Significant heterogeneity in simulation, planning and treatment was identified. Immobilization included 5-point thermoplastic mask (n = 12, 32%), Vacloc (n = 12, 32%) arms-up thorax bag (n = 11, 30%). 4-D CT scans were obtained in 46%, MR simulation in 21%, and intravenous contrast in 10%. Median dose was 40 Gy (interquartile range (IQR): 35-40) in 5 fractions, (BED10 = 72 Gy), over a median of 12 days (IQR: 9-14). Seventeen cases (44%) utilized a low-dose elective volume to cover remaining axilla; 14% used a high dose clinical target volume. Median planning target volume margin was 5mm (range: 3-10mm), and plans were generated with 5 different dose constraint protocols. At first radiographic assessment, 87% had partial or complete response, with a single progression. Of symptomatic patients (n = 14), 57% had complete symptom resolution and 21% had improvement. One and 2-year LF rate were 19% and 31%, respectively. Median OS was 21.0 months (95% [Confidence Interval (CI)] 17.3-not reached) and median PFS was 7.0 months (95% [CI] 4.3-11.3). Acute and late toxicities were uncommon, with two grade 3 events (1 plexopathy in a case with tumor involving brachial plexus, 1 skin ulceration) identified, and no grade 4/5.

CONCLUSION

In this series of AM SBRT, low rates of toxicity, and good rates of LF and symptom improvement were observed. As treatment was delivered with a variety of individual treatment differences, an institutional protocol is under development to standardize technique, optimize efficiency and improve evaluability.

Heatmaps to Assess Tumor Motion Probability with MRcine in Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Intrafraction motion affects tumor position during radiation for head and neck cancers (HNC) and can be assessed using magnetic resonance cine (MR-cine). Heatmaps - visual representation of patient specific temporal tumor location akin to internal target volume (ITV) - were analyzed to demonstrate the variation of population-based motion margins in primary oropharyngeal (OP) and laryngeal/hypopharyngeal (LH) sites with the goal to provide insights towards personalized margins.

MATERIALS/METHODS

MR-cine were performed for LH and OP HNC patients as part of simulation protocol. Images (900-1500 slices) were acquired across 3-5 minutes per patient. Gross target volumes were propagated on T1 contrast sagittal sequence using deformable image registration then adjusted manually. Tumor locations were integrated across all frames and displayed as heatmaps representing location probability. To determine individualized motion, a baseline contour representing average tumor rest position was expanded both isotropically and directionally in 1 mm increments in a novel analysis to define the contribution of each increment on target coverage. To assess directional dependence, displacements from rest position were evaluated in 4 planes from centroid: (A) 12 o'clock (OC) to 6OC (capturing volumetric shift in a portion of superior, posterior and inferior directions), B) 3OC-9OC, C) 6OC-12OC, D) 9OC-3OC. Histograms demonstrating the proportion of scan time the tumor was within expansions were generated, with expansion margins for 25%-95% coverage analyzed by patient. Wilcoxon-rank-sum test was performed to compare motion by site.

RESULTS

Motion was evaluated in 66 patients (LH n = 27, OP n = 39). In LH, a median (med) isometric expansion of 8.5mm to achieve 95% target was required, with large variations observed for minimum (min): 2.8mm and maximum (max):23.5mm. Smaller differences were observed for OP with med of 5.3mm, (min:1.9mm, max:14.6mm). At 75%, 50% and 25% coverage, expansions for LH (med: 4.8 min: 1.9 max: 17.3; med: 3.8 min: 1.2 max: 12.9; med: 3.3, min: 0.6, max: 9.3) were not significantly different than OP (med: 3.8, min: 1.7, max: 10.9; med: 3.1 min: 1.3, max: 9.4; med: 2.1, min: 0.7, max: 8.4), suggesting larger but infrequent shifts in LH. Directional tumor displacement varied widely (Table 1), and by site and points describing the need for personalized margins.

CONCLUSION

Current literature as well as the analysis in this study indicate a wide range of motion - both in magnitude and duty cycle - between and within HN sub-sites not captured on CT simulation. Moving forward, motion based heatmaps based on MR-cine may serve as visualization tool for ITV contouring or to generate personalized motion margins.

An Update of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for the Palliation of Unirradiated Mucosal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC)

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

We report the treatment outcomes of palliative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in patients with primary mucosal head and neck cancer (HNC) who were not eligible to receive conventional radiation therapy (RT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

This is a retrospective study that reviewed the medical records of patients with primary SCC mucosal HNC who were treated with SBRT between 2011 and 2022. Patients with other histologies, skin cancer, parotid tumors, or recurrent previously irradiated tumors were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients and 77 tumors were treated with SBRT in this cohort. The median age in the study was 81 (52-97) years and the median follow-up was 7.2 months. The most common site of HNC was the oral cavity (62%), followed by the oropharynx (18%), hypopharynx (8%), larynx (5%), nasal cavity/sinonasal cancer (3%), and unknown primary (1%). T3-4 lesions were found in most patients (76%). SBRT doses ranged from 35-50 Gy in 5 fractions, and the most common prescription dose was ≥45 Gy in 5 fractions (60%) for the GTV prescription. An elective nodal volume of 25 Gy in 5 fractions was infrequently (17%) used. Most patients (81%) who were treated twice a week completed in ≤14 days. The predominant symptoms at presentation were: pain (41%), mass effect (39%), dysphagia/odynophagia (14%), headache/nasal obstruction (1.4%), bleeding (1.4%), stridor (1.4%), asymptomatic (1.4%), and unknown (1.4%). 84% of patients had symptomatic response to treatment with 24% of them having complete symptom response. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) was 6.7% and at 6 months and 17.9% at 12 months, respectively. Cumulative incidence of distant metastasis was 7.3% and 10.5% at 6 and 12 months. Cancer was the most common cause of death in 29 patients (51%). The median overall survival (OS) was 8 months with 6 and 12-month OS rates of 67% and 36%, respectively. 39% of patients developed acute G3 toxicity, including 30% with G3 mucositis, 5% with G3 dysphagia, and 4% with G3 dermatitis. A crude rate of late G ≥3 toxicity was observed in 11% of patients including (5%, n = 4) with osteoradionecrosis, and a single case of dysphagia, soft tissue necrosis, supraglottic ulceration, and mucosal necrosis.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the feasibility of SBRT as a treatment option for primary mucosal head and neck cancer patients who are not eligible for conventional radiation therapy. The results indicate that SBRT was effective in achieving local control and symptom relief, but larger prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings. The Canadian Cancer Trials Group has endorsed HN-13, a randomized control trial comparing HN SBRT to palliative RT.

Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Ultra-Central Thoracic Tumors

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized in the management of ultra-central thoracic tumors, although concerns regarding significant toxicity remain. We sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of SBRT to these tumors at our institution.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with ultra-central lung tumors or nodes treated at our institution with SBRT between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Ultra-central was defined as having the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping or abutting the central bronchial tree and/or esophagus. All SBRT plans were generated with homogenous dose distributions using target coverage objectives of ITV V100% >99%, PTV V95% >99%, and an ideal PTV Dmax <105% (strict <120%). All plans were reviewed in quality assurance rounds by a team of dosimetrists, physicists, and radiation oncologists. The primary endpoint was incidence of severe toxicity (ST), defined as SBRT-related grade ≥3 toxicities, graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V5.0. Secondary endpoints included local failure (LF), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Competing risk analysis was used to estimate incidence and predictors of ST and LF, with death as a competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients who received 162 ultra-central courses of SBRT were included, with a median follow-up of 21.5 months. Treatment intent was most commonly for oligoprogression (46%), oligometastasis (30%), followed by curative (20%). The most frequent tumor histologies were NSCLC (41%) and RCC (26%). SBRT prescription doses ranged from 30-55 Gy in 5 fractions (BED10 range 48-115 Gy). The most common prescription was 50 Gy in 5 fractions (42%). The cumulative incidence of ST was 8.9% at 3-years. The most common ST was pneumonitis (n = 4). Notable toxicities included bronchopleural fistula (n = 2, grade 3 and 4), bronchial stricture (n = 1, grade 3), and esophagitis leading to bleeding (n = 1, grade 4). There were no esophageal strictures or perforations, and no bronchial bleeds. There was 1 possible treatment related death from pneumonitis/pneumonia. Predictors of any ST included increased lung V5 Gy, decreased PTV V95%, and not having prior radiation therapy to the chest. The cumulative incidence of LF was 4.8%, 11% and 14% at 1-, 2-, and 3-years respectively. Predictors of LF included younger age, and greater volume of overlap between the PTV and esophagus. Median PFS was 8.4 months, while median OS was 3.7 years.

CONCLUSION

In one of the largest case series of ultra-central thoracic SBRT reported to date, homogenously prescribed SBRT plans were associated with relatively low rates of ST and LF across a variety of treatment indications. Predictors of ST should be interpreted recognizing the heterogeneity in toxicities observed. Identified predictors of both ST and LF can contribute to future work to optimize the therapeutic ratio in treatment of ultra-central thoracic tumors.

Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Lung Tumours Not Suitable for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy

AIMS

Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy is used at our institution for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients not eligible for stereotactic body radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to report clinical outcomes of delivering 60 Gy in 15 fractions for these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All NSCLC patients who received 60 Gy in 15 fractions were reviewed. Outcomes of interest were local failure, regional failure, distant progression, overall survival and treatment-associated toxicities.

RESULTS

In total, 111 patients were included. The median age was 78.8 years and most tumours were adenocarcinoma (n = 55, 49.6%). Sixty-five patients (58.6%) were N0. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 12 and 24 months in the N0 cohort was 5.2% and 14.2%, respectively, compared with 11.5% and 14.8% for N+ patients. Tumour size >35 mm predicted for local failure (hazard ratio 2.706, 95% confidence interval 1.002-7.307, P = 0.0494). Distant progression at 12 and 24 months in N0 patients was 13.7% and 24.3% compared with 24.6% and 33.5% in N+ patients. In N0 patients, larger tumour size was associated with increased risk of distant progression. The median overall survival was 38.1 months in N0 patients versus 31.7 months in N+ patients. The most common toxicity was radiation pneumonitis (n = 6, 6.4%). The incidence of any grade 3 toxicity was 10.3% at ≥1 year. There were no deaths or hospitalisations attributed to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy is well tolerated and resulted in favourable clinical outcomes in various stages of NSCLC patients.

Outcomes and toxicities in oligometastatic patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for adrenal gland metastases: A multi-institutional retrospective study

•

SBRT to adrenal gland oligometastases achieves a satisfactory local control and OS.

•

A minimum PTV dose BED₁₀ > 46 Gy was associated with an improved OS and LRFS.

•

A prescribed BED₁₀ > 70 Gy was correlated with improved local control.

•

High adrenal metastases volume should not preclude the delivery of SBRT.

Background

Studies reporting SBRT outcomes in oligometastatic patients with adrenal gland metastases (AGM) are limited. Herein, we present a multi-institutional analysis of oligometastatic patients treated with SBRT for AGM.

Material/methods

The Consortium for Oligometastases Research (CORE) is among the largest retrospective series of patients with oligometastases. Among CORE patients, those treated with SBRT for AGM were included. Clinical and dosimetric data were collected. Adrenal metastatic burden (AMB) was defined as the sum of all adrenal GTV if more than one oligometastases is present.

Competing risk analysis was used to estimate actuarial cumulative local recurrence (LR) and widespread progression (WP). Kaplan-Meier method was used to report overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Treatment related toxicities were also reported.

Results

The analysis included 47 patients with 57 adrenal lesions. Median follow-up was 18.2 months. Median LRFS, PFS, and OS were 15.3, 5.3, and 19.1 months, respectively. A minimum PTV dose BED₁₀ > 46 Gy was associated with an improved OS and LRFS. A prescribed BED₁₀ > 70 Gy was an independent predictor of a lower LR probability. AMB>10 cc was an independent predictor of a lower risk for WP. Only one patient developed an acute Grade 3 toxicity consisting of abdominal pain.

Conclusion

SBRT to AGM achieved a satisfactory local control and OS in oligometastatic patients. High minimum PTV dose and BED₁₀ prescription doses were predictive of improved LR and OS, respectively. Prospective studies are needed to determine comprehensive criteria for patients SBRT eligibility and dosimetric planning.

Development and pre-testing of a rehabilitation planning consultation for head-and-neck cancer

BACKGROUND

In contrast with other major chronic conditions such as heart disease and stroke, cancer care does not routinely integrate evidence-based rehabilitation services within the standard continuum. The objectives of the present project were to develop a rehabilitation planning consultation (rpc) for survivors of head-and-neck (hn) cancer, to test its feasibility, and to make refinements.

METHODS

Using intervention mapping, the rpc-alpha was developed by examining potential theoretical methods and practical applications relative to the program objectives. During feasibility testing, a single case series was conducted with survivors of hn cancer who had completed their cancer treatment within the preceding 11 months; iterative refinements were made after each case.

RESULTS

The rpc-alpha was led by a rehabilitation professional and was based on self-management principles. The initial consultation included instruction in a global cognitive strategy, goal-setting, introduction to available resources, action planning, and coping planning. A follow-up consultation was conducted a few weeks later. Of 9 participants recruited, 5 completed post-intervention assessments. Participants reported that the rpc helped them to make rehabilitation plans.

CONCLUSIONS

The rpc was feasible to use and satisfactory to a small group of hn cancer survivors. A pilot test of the refined version is in process.

Comparison of survival between radiation therapy and trans-oral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer patients; a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The literature reports various treatment methodologies, such as trans-oral laser microsurgery, radiation therapy, total/partial laryngectomies, and concurrent radiation chemotherapy for patients with early larynx cancer. However, at the forefront of early glottis treatment is trans-oral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy, likely due to better functional and survival outcomes. Here we conduct the largest Canadian head-to-head comparison of consecutive patients treated with either radiation therapy or trans-oral laser microsurgery. Additionally, we compare these two treatments and their 5-year survival rates post treatment to add to the existing literature.

METHODS

Charts of patients who were diagnosed with early glottic cancer between 2006 and 2013 were reviewed. Seventy-five patients were identified, and split into 2 groups based on their primary treatment, trans-oral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, life-tables, and the log-rank statistic were reported to determine if there was a difference between the two treatment groups and their disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and total laryngectomy-free survival. Additionally, each different survival analysis was stratified by potential confounding variables, to help conclude which treatment is more efficacious in this population.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-specific survival rate is 93.3 % σ = 0.063 and 90.8 % σ = 0.056 for patients treated with trans-oral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy, respectively (χ (2) < 0.001, p = 0.983). The disease free survival rate is 60.0 % (σ =0.121) for patients treated with trans-oral laser microsurgery, and 67.2 % (σ = 0.074) for those who received RT (χ (2) = 0.19, p = 0.663). Additionally, the total laryngectomy-free survival rate is 84.1 % (σ = 0.1) and 79.1 % (σ = 0.072) for patients' early glottic cancer treated by trans-oral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy, respectively (χ (2) = 0.235, p = 0.628). Chi-square analysis of age-group versus treatment group (χ (2) = 6.455, p = 0.04) and T-stage versus treatment group (χ (2) = 11.3, p = 0.001) revealed a statistically significant relationship, suggesting survival analysis should be stratified by these variables. However, after stratification, there was no statistically significant difference between the trans-oral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy groups in any of the survival analyses.

CONCLUSION

No difference was demonstrated in the 5-year disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, and total laryngectomy-free survival, between the RT and TLM treatment groups. Additionally, both groups showed similar 5-year survival after stratifying by confounding variables.

Predictive factors for local control in primary and metastatic lung tumours after four to five fraction stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy: a single institution's comprehensive experience

AIMS

We report the outcomes of a large lung stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) programme for primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pulmonary metastases. The primary study aim was to identify factors predictive for local control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 311 pulmonary tumours in 254 patients were treated between 2008 and 2011 with SABR using 48-60 Gy in four to five fractions. Local, regional and distant failure data were collected prospectively, whereas other end points were collected retrospectively. Potential clinical and dosimetric predictors of local control were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 311 tumours, 240 were NSCLC and 71 were other histologies. The 2 year local control rate was 96% in stage I NSCLC, 76% in colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases and 91% in non-lung/non-CRC metastases. Predictors of better local control on multivariate analysis were non-CRC tumours and a larger proportion of the planning target volume (PTV) receiving ≥100% of the prescribed dose (higher PTV V100). Among the 45 CRC metastases, a higher PTV V100 and previous chemotherapy predicted for better local control.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung SABR of 48-60 Gy/four to five fractions resulted in high local control rates for all tumours except CRC metastases. Covering more of the PTV with the prescription dose (a higher PTV V100) also resulted in superior local control.