1
|
Ruud T, Hasselberg N, Siqveland J, Holgersen KH. Patient-reported outcome, clinician-reported outcome, and patient satisfaction with treatment by crisis resolution teams: a multicenter pre-post study of outcome and associated factors in Norway. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:82. [PMID: 38297302 PMCID: PMC10829386 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05543-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) have become a part of mental health services in many high-income countries. Many studies have investigated the impact of CRTs on acute admissions to inpatient units, but very few studies have investigated patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes for CRT service users. Our aims were to study patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes of CRT treatment, how the outcomes were associated with characteristics of the service user and the treatment, and whether outcomes were different across CRTs. METHODS The study was a pre-post observational multicenter study of 475 patients receiving treatment from 25 CRTs in urban and rural areas in Norway. There was no control group. Outcomes were change in mental health status reported by service users using CORE-10 and by clinicians using HoNOS. Patient satisfaction was measured using CSQ-8 at the end of the treatment. Components of CRT accessibility and interventions were measured by clinicians reporting details on each session with the service user. CRT model fidelity was measured using the CORE CRT Fidelity Scale version 2. We used paired t-tests to analyze outcomes and linear mixed modeling to analyze associations of the outcomes with the characteristics of service users and the treatment provided. Using independent t-tests, we analyzed differences in outcomes and patient satisfaction between two clusters of CRTs with differences in accessibility. RESULTS The patient-reported outcomes and the clinician-reported outcomes were significantly positive and with a large effect size. Both were significantly positively associated with practical support and medication management and negatively associated with collaboration with mental health inpatient units. Patient satisfaction was high at the end of the treatment. CRTs with higher accessibility had a significantly better clinician-reported outcome, but no significant differences were reported for patient-reported outcomes or patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS CRT treatment led to improved symptom status as reported by patients and clinicians, as well as high patient satisfaction. Practical support and medication management were the interventions most strongly associated with positive outcomes. Some of the variations in outcomes were at the team level. Patient- and clinician-reported outcomes should be used more in studies on the effect of treatment provided by crisis resolution teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Ruud
- Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - N Hasselberg
- Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - J Siqveland
- Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- National Center for Suicide Research and Prevention, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - K H Holgersen
- Nidelv Community Mental Health Centre, Tiller, Department of Mental Health, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Effectiveness of a Community-Based Crisis Resolution Team for Patients with Severe Mental Illness in Greece: A Prospective Observational Study. Community Ment Health J 2023; 59:14-24. [PMID: 35588027 PMCID: PMC9118182 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-022-00983-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
This prospective observational study evaluated the effectiveness of a crisis resolution team (CRT) for outpatient treatment of psychiatric patients experiencing an acute episode of severe mental disorder. The effectiveness of the CRT (n = 65) was assessed against the care-as-usual [CAU group (n = 65)]. Patients' clinical state, overall functioning, quality of life and satisfaction were respectively evaluated at baseline, post intervention and three-month post-intervention.CRT patients compared to the CAU group, had significantly improved outcomes concerning clinical state and patient satisfaction at post intervention phase. Statistically significant improvement was also recorded for the dimensions of environment, physical and psychological health related to quality of life. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding overall functioning.On the basis of these results, reforming of existing crisis-management services, in Greece, using the CRT model may improve substantially the services offered to psychiatric patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
Denecke K, May R, Borycki EM, Kushniruk AW. Digital health as an enabler for hospital@home: A rising trend or just a vision? Front Public Health 2023; 11:1137798. [PMID: 36875371 PMCID: PMC9981936 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1137798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hospital@home is a model of healthcare, where healthcare professionals actively treat patients in their homes for conditions that may otherwise require hospitalization. Similar models of care have been implemented in jurisdictions around the world over the past few years. However, there are new developments in health informatics including digital health and participatory health informatics that may have an impact on hospital@home approaches. Objectives This study aims to identify the current state of implementation of emerging concepts into the hospital@home research and models of care; to identify strengths and weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with the models of care; and to suggest a research agenda. Methods We employed two research methodologies, namely, a literature review and a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis. The literature from the last 10 years was collected from PubMed using the search string "hospital at home" OR "care at home" OR "patient at home." Relevant information was extracted from the included articles. Results Title and abstract review were conducted on 1,371 articles. The full-text review was conducted on 82 articles. Data were extracted from 42 articles that met our review criteria. Most of the studies originated from the United States and Spain. Several medical conditions were considered. The use of digital tools and technologies was rarely reported. In particular, innovative approaches such as wearables or sensor technologies were rarely used. The current landscape of hospital@home models of care simply delivers hospital care in the patient's home. Tools or approaches from taking a participatory health informatics design approach involving a range of stakeholders (such as patients and their caregivers) were not reported in the literature reviewed. In addition, emerging technologies supporting mobile health applications, wearable technologies, and remote monitoring were rarely discussed. Conclusion There are multiple benefits and opportunities associated with hospital@home implementations. There are also threats and weaknesses associated with the use of this model of care. Some weaknesses could be addressed by using digital health and wearable technologies to support patient monitoring and treatment at home. Employing a participatory health informatics approach to design and implementation could help to ensure the acceptance of such care models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard May
- Harz University of Applied Sciences, Wernigerode, Germany
| | - Elizabeth M Borycki
- School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Andre W Kushniruk
- School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soldini E, Alippi M, Zufferey MC, Lisi A, Lucchini M, Albanese E, Colombo RA, Rossa S, Bolla E, Mellacqua ZB, Larghi G, Cordasco S, Kawohl W, Crivelli L, Traber R. Effectiveness of crisis resolution home treatment for the management of acute psychiatric crises in Southern Switzerland: a natural experiment based on geography. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:405. [PMID: 35715789 PMCID: PMC9204869 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04020-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Crisis Resolution Home Treatment (CRHT) is an alternative to inpatient treatment for acute psychiatric crises management. However, evidence on CRHT effectiveness is still limited. In the Canton of Ticino (Southern Switzerland), in 2016 the regional public psychiatric hospital replaced one acute ward with a CRHT. The current study was designed within this evaluation setting to assess the effectiveness of CRHT compared to standard inpatient treatment. METHODS CRHT was offered to patients aged 18 to 65 with an acute psychiatric crisis that would have required hospitalization. We used a natural experiment based on geography, where intervention and control groups were formed according to the place of residence. Primary endpoints were reduction of psychiatric symptoms at discharge measured using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, treatment duration in days, and rate and length of readmissions during a two-year follow-up period after discharge. Safety during the treatment period was measured with the number of serious adverse events (suicide/suicide attempts, major self-harm episodes, acute alcohol/drug intoxications, aggressions to caregivers or family members). We used linear, log-linear and logistic regression models with propensity scores for the main analysis. RESULTS We enrolled 321 patients; 67 were excluded because the treatment period was too short and 17 because they were transferred before the end of the treatment. Two hundred thirty-seven patients were available for data analysis, 93 in the intervention group and 144 in the control group. No serious adverse event was observed during the treatment period in both groups. Reduction of psychiatric symptoms at discharge (p-value = 0.359), readmission rates (p-value = 0.563) and length of readmissions (p-value = 0.770) during the two-year follow-up period did not differ significantly between the two groups. Treatment duration was significantly higher in the treatment group (+ 29.6% on average, p-value = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS CRHT was comparable to standard hospitalization in terms of psychiatric symptoms reduction, readmission rates and length of readmissions, but it was also characterized by a longer first treatment period. However, observational evidence following the study indicated that CRHT duration constantly lowered over time since its introduction in 2016 and became comparable to hospitalization, showing therefore to be an effective alternative also in terms of treatment length. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN38472626 (17/11/2020, retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emiliano Soldini
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928, Manno, Switzerland.
| | - Maddalena Alippi
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Maria Caiata Zufferey
- grid.16058.3a0000000123252233Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland
| | - Angela Lisi
- grid.16058.3a0000000123252233Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland
| | - Mario Lucchini
- grid.7563.70000 0001 2174 1754Department of Sociology and Social Research, Università Degli Studi Di Milano Bicocca, piazza dell’Ateneo nuovo 1, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Emiliano Albanese
- grid.29078.340000 0001 2203 2861Institute of Public Health (IPH), Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università Della Svizzera Italiana, Via Giuseppe Buffi 13, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Raffaella Ada Colombo
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Simona Rossa
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Emilio Bolla
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Zefiro Benedetto Mellacqua
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppina Larghi
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Severino Cordasco
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Wolfram Kawohl
- Clienia Schlössli, Psychiatric Hospital, Schlösslistrasse 8, 8618 Oetwil Am See, Switzerland
| | - Luca Crivelli
- grid.16058.3a0000000123252233Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland
| | - Rafael Traber
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martín-Blanco A, Calvo-Saiz L, Baccarin J, González-Fernández A, Keymer-Gausset A, Vieira-Costa S, Ribas-Fitó N, Garcia-Ribera C. Is intensive home-treatment a real alternative to classical hospitalization for managing acute psychiatric processes? Insights from clinical practice. REVISTA DE PSIQUIATRIA Y SALUD MENTAL 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|