Celiac disease and intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus (Barrett's esophagus)

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings in celiac disease at diagnosis: A multicenter international retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Gastroduodenal endoscopy and biopsy following positive specific serology is considered the gold standard to diagnose celiac disease (CeD) in adults. Whether upper endoscopy helps detect comorbid conditions is unknown.

AIM

To investigate the prevalence of non-celiac endoscopic findings in patients in whom endoscopy was performed to confirm CeD diagnosis.

METHODS

This is an observational, descriptive, multicenter, retrospective study that reports endoscopic findings obtained in adult patients enrolled in local registries from four tertiary centers. We collected data reported on first endoscopy, indicated for investigation of CeD. Diagnosis of CeD was performed by histology (≥ Marsh 2 type mucosal damage) and specific serology. Two European and one North American center included biopsy-confirmed CeD following positive serology. A fourth center (South America) included symptomatic patients undergoing endoscopy, irrespective of CeD serology. The latter cohort included a non-CeD control group.

RESULTS

A total of 1328 patients (80% female; 35 years median age) were enrolled, of whom 95.6% had positive specific serology. In 135 patients, endoscopy revealed 163 abnormalities unrelated to CeD (prevalence: 10.1%). Erosive reflux esophagitis (6.4%), gastric erosions (2.0%), and suspicion of esophageal metaplasia (1.2%) were the most common findings. Biopsy-confirmed Barrett’s esophagus was infrequent (0.2%). No endoscopic cancer was detected. Older patients (≥ 51 years of age) had a higher prevalence of endoscopic findings than those ≤ 50 (P < 0.01). Within the South American cohort, CeD was associated with a lower rate (8.2%) of comorbid endoscopic findings compared with controls (29.1%; P < 0.001). In the adjusted multivariate analysis of this cohort, having CeD was associated with a 72% reduction in the risk of any endoscopic abnormality (P < 0.0001), and having alarm symptoms was associated with a 37% reduction in the risk of finding at least one endoscopic lesion (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In this large multicenter study, young adults with positive CeD serology had few comorbid endoscopic findings. Although patients over 51 years had a high prevalence of non-CeD gastroduodenal mucosal damage, no malignancy or premalignant lesions were found.

Celiac disease, eosinophilic esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease, an adult population-based study

OBJECTIVE

Celiac disease (CD) has been linked to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), but population-based studies of the prevalence of CD in these conditions are lacking, that is, the aim of this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An endoscopic study was carried out in 1000 randomly selected adults from the general population. CD was defined on the basis of positive serology in parallel with mucosal abnormalities of the small intestine. Any eosinophil infiltration of the esophageal epithelium was defined as esophageal eosinophilia and EoE was defined as having at least 15 eosinophils/high-power field in biopsies from the distal esophagus. We used Fisher's exact test to compare the prevalence of GORD, esophageal eosinophilia, and EoE in subjects with CD versus controls.

RESULTS

Four hundred subjects (40%) had gastroesophageal reflux symptoms (GORS), 155 (15.5%) had erosive esophagitis, 16 (1.6%) had Barrett's esophagus, 48 (4.8%) had esophageal eosinophilia, and 11 (1.1%) had EoE. CD was diagnosed in 8/400 (2.0%) individuals with GORS (vs. controls: 10/600 (1.7%), p = 0.81), in 3/155 (1.9%) with erosive esophagitis (vs. 15/845 controls (1.8%), p = 0.75), and in 2/48 (4.2%) individuals with esophageal eosinophilia (controls: 16/952 (1.7%), p = 0.21), but in none of those 16 with Barrett's esophagus (vs. 18/984 controls (1.8%), p = 1.0) or of the 11 individuals with EoE (controls: 18/989 (1.8%), p = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based study found no increased risk of CD among individuals with GORD, esophageal eosinophilia, or EoE. CD screening of individuals with GORD or EoE of individuals with CD cannot be recommended.

Barrett's esophagus and the increasing role of endoluminal therapy

Barrett's esophagus, or the presence of specialized intestinal mucosa in the esophagus that has a malignant potential, has experienced a rapid increase in diagnosis and prevalence over the past few decades. Once thought to progress to adenocarcinoma in an orderly sequence of increasing dysplasia, recent data suggest the process can be more random. In combination with targeted surveillance endoscopy, recent improvements in technology have aided endoluminal therapy in becoming a cost-effective adjunct to medication. When used in combination, in particular, these ablative therapies have become suitable, if not preferable, alternatives to surgery in many patients.

Endoscopic markers for celiac disease

Celiac disease is common and can present with nonspecific upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Patients may therefore undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy as their initial investigation. Markers of villous atrophy, which can be seen in the duodenum during endoscopy, are well described. They have limited sensitivity for patients with mild enteropathy and duodenal biopsies should be performed if there is strong suspicion of celiac disease irrespective of endoscopic appearance. Endoscopic markers do, however, allow the selection of patients with nonspecific symptoms for duodenal biopsy, and these markers should, therefore, be looked for routinely during esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Barrett's esophagus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Barrett's esophagus continues to be a popular topic among clinicians and researchers alike. Population based studies have finally been undertaken to better identify subset populations at high risk of developing Barrett's esophagus, and possible better tolerated alternatives to standard endoscopy for cost-effective screening. In addition, several studies over the past year have marked a transition from identifying those with Barrett's esophagus and in need of intensive surveillance, to an increasing number of novel treatment therapies that are now primed to move from experimental protocols to clinical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Obesity's role as a risk factor for the development of Barrett's esophagus continues to be better defined. Various disorders affecting the motility of the gastrointestinal tract, such as celiac sprue and scleroderma, and their relationship with Barrett's esophagus development are becoming more widely recognized. The use of endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy for treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus continues to gain increased acceptance, with an additional wealth of supportive data for its effectiveness becoming available.

SUMMARY

The past year has brought many advances in the epidemiology and endoscopic treatment of those with Barrett's esophagus. Clinicians will benefit from this review of these advances to ensure better patient outcomes.

Advances in celiac disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article primarily aims to review critically research in all aspects of celiac disease over the last year. As always, there has been a wealth of relevant papers.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role of genetics in disease susceptibility is slowly becoming more clearly defined and a more detailed understanding of the disease processes at the molecular level is paving the way towards the development of specific targeted therapies.

SUMMARY

Despite recent advances in our understanding of celiac disease, the gluten-free diet remains the only current viable therapy and even with advances in serological tests and markers, the duodenal biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis and monitoring of the response to therapy.

Endoscopy in celiac disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The primary objective of this review is to highlight the evidence for the role of endoscopy in celiac disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence is presented that the endoscopic markers of celiac disease are specific although not sensitive for the disease. Villous atrophy, the hallmark of celiac disease, is patchy in the duodenum, and various techniques may identify areas of villous atrophy. These methods include magnification endoscopy and chromoendoscopy. The most recent innovation, video capsule endoscopy, may be of value in the diagnosis of celiac disease and in the assessment of patients with complicated celiac disease.

SUMMARY

Endoscopy and duodenal biopsies are the mainstay for diagnosing celiac disease. Although characteristic endoscopic features may be useful, their absence does not exclude celiac disease. Random biopsy, even of normal-appearing mucosa is necessary for the diagnosis of celiac disease.