1
|
Kondajji A, Klingler M, Tu C, Kelley R, El-Hayek K, Rodriquez J, Cline M, Fathalizadeh A, Allemang M. Gastroparesis with concomitant gastrointestinal dysmotility is not a contraindication for per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP). Surg Endosc 2022; 36:4226-4232. [PMID: 34642799 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08756-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP or G-POEM) provides significant short-term improvements in symptoms and objective emptying for patients with medically refractory gastroparesis, but it is unclear if patients with gastroparesis and co-existing dysmotility (small bowel or colonic delay) also benefit. In this study, we used wireless motility capsule (WMC) data to measure outcomes in patients with isolated gastroparesis (GP) and gastroparesis with co-existing dysmotility (GP + Dys) who underwent POP. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients who had POP and completed WMC data during their evaluation of intestinal dysmotility. WMC data were reviewed to identify patients who demonstrated isolated GP or GP + Dys. Each patient's pre-op and post-op Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and 4-h solid-phase scintigraphy gastric emptying studies (GES) scores were compared to evaluate improvement. RESULTS Of the entire cohort (n = 73), 89% were female with a mean age of 47.0 ± 15.0 years old. Gastroparesis etiologies were divided among idiopathic (54.8%), diabetic (26%), postsurgical (8.2%), autoimmune (5.5%), and multifactorial (5.5%). Forty-one patients (56%) had GP and 32 patients (44%) had GP + Dys. GCSI improved after POP whether the patient had isolated GP (- 12.31, p < 0.001) or GP + Dys (- 9.58, p < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference in total GCSI improvement between the two groups. A subset of patients had postoperative GES available (n = 47). In the isolated GP and GP + Dys cohorts, 15/28 (54%) and 12/19 (63%) patients had normal post-op 4-h GES, respectively, but no statistical difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION Patients with medically refractory gastroparesis with and without concomitant gastrointestinal dysmotility show short-term subjective and objective improvement after POP. Concomitant small bowel or colonic dysmotility should not deter physicians from offering POP in carefully selected patients with gastroparesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhiram Kondajji
- Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
- General Surgery Resident, Cleveland Clinic-South Pointe Hospital, 20000 Harvard Road, Warrensville Height, OH, 44122, USA.
| | - Michael Klingler
- Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Chao Tu
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Rebecca Kelley
- Dermatology and Plastic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - John Rodriquez
- Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Michael Cline
- Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alisan Fathalizadeh
- Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Matthew Allemang
- Digestive Disease and Surgical Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scott SM, Simrén M, Farmer AD, Dinning PG, Carrington EV, Benninga MA, Burgell RE, Dimidi E, Fikree A, Ford AC, Fox M, Hoad CL, Knowles CH, Krogh K, Nugent K, Remes-Troche JM, Whelan K, Corsetti M. Chronic constipation in adults: Contemporary perspectives and clinical challenges. 1: Epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical associations, pathophysiology and investigation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14050. [PMID: 33263938 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic constipation is a prevalent disorder that affects patients' quality of life and consumes resources in healthcare systems worldwide. In clinical practice, it is still considered a challenge as clinicians frequently are unsure as to which treatments to use and when. Over a decade ago, a Neurogastroenterology & Motility journal supplement devoted to the investigation and management of constipation was published (2009; 21 (Suppl.2)). This included seven articles, disseminating all themes covered during a preceding 2-day meeting held in London, entitled "Current perspectives in chronic constipation: a scientific and clinical symposium." In October 2018, the 3rd London Masterclass, entitled "Contemporary management of constipation" was held, again over 2 days. All faculty members were invited to author two new review articles, which represent a collective synthesis of talks presented and discussions held during this meeting. PURPOSE This article represents the first of these reviews, addressing epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical associations, pathophysiology, and investigation. Clearly, not all aspects of the condition can be covered in adequate detail; hence, there is a focus on particular "hot topics" and themes that are of contemporary interest. The second review addresses management of chronic constipation, covering behavioral, conservative, medical, and surgical therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mark Scott
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Magnus Simrén
- Department of Internal Medicine & Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Adam D Farmer
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Institute of Applied Clinical Science, University of Keele, Keele, UK
| | - Philip G Dinning
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University & Discipline of Gastroenterology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Emma V Carrington
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Surgical Professorial Unit, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marc A Benninga
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rebecca E Burgell
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Eirini Dimidi
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Asma Fikree
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Gastroenterology Department, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Alexander C Ford
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mark Fox
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Digestive Function: Basel, Laboratory and Clinic for Motility Disorders and Functional Gastrointestinal Diseases, Centre for Integrative Gastroenterology, Klinik Arlesheim, Arlesheim, Switzerland
| | - Caroline L Hoad
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK
| | - Charles H Knowles
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Klaus Krogh
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karen Nugent
- Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Jose Maria Remes-Troche
- Digestive Physiology and Motility Lab, Medical Biological Research Institute, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - Kevin Whelan
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Maura Corsetti
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), Hospitals NHS Trust and the University of Nottingham, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK.,Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Song J, Yin J, Chen JDZ. Inhibitory Effects and Sympathetic Mechanisms of Distension in the Distal Organs on Small Bowel Motility and Slow Waves in Canine. Cell Biochem Biophys 2017; 73:665-72. [PMID: 27259308 DOI: 10.1007/s12013-015-0679-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Rectal distension (RD) is known to induce intestinal dysmotility. Few studies were performed to compare effects of RD, colon distension (CD) and duodenal distension (DD) on small bowel motility. This study aimed to investigate effects and underlying mechanisms of distensions in these regions on intestinal motility and slow waves. Eight dogs chronically implanted with a duodenal fistula, a proximal colon fistula, and intestinal serosal electrodes were studied in six sessions: control, RD, CD, DD, RD + guanethidine, and CD + guanethidine. Postprandial intestinal contractions and slow waves were recorded for the assessment of intestinal motility. The electrocardiogram was recorded for the assessment of autonomic functions. (1) Isobaric RD and CD suppressed intestinal contractions (contractile index: 6.0 ± 0.4 with RD vs. 9.9 ± 0.9 at baseline, P = 0.001, 5.3 ± 0.2 with CD vs. 7.7 ± 0.8 at baseline, P = 0.008). Guanethidine at 3 mg/kg iv was able to partially block the effects. (2) RD and CD reduced the percentage of normal intestinal slow waves from 92.1 ± 2.8 to 64.2 ± 3.4 % (P < 0.001) and from 90 ± 2.7 to 69.2 ± 3.7 % (P = 0.01), respectively. Guanethidine could eliminate these inhibitory effects. (3) DD did not induce any changes in small intestinal contractions and slow waves (P > 0.05). (4) The spectral analysis of the heart rate variability showed that both RD and CD increased sympathetic activity (LF) and reduced vagal activity (HF) (P < 0.05). Isobaric RD and CD could inhibit postprandial intestinal motility and impair intestinal slow waves, which were mediated via the sympathetic pathway. However, DD at a site proximal to the measurement site did not seem to impair small intestinal contractions or slow waves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Song
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.,Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, People's Republic of China
| | - Jieyun Yin
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.,Ningbo Pace Translational Medical Research Center, Beilun, Ningbo, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiande D Z Chen
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. .,Ningbo Pace Translational Medical Research Center, Beilun, Ningbo, People's Republic of China. .,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Center for Neurogastroenterology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang YT, Mohammed SD, Farmer AD, Wang D, Zarate N, Hobson AR, Hellström PM, Semler JR, Kuo B, Rao SS, Hasler WL, Camilleri M, Scott SM. Regional gastrointestinal transit and pH studied in 215 healthy volunteers using the wireless motility capsule: influence of age, gender, study country and testing protocol. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015. [PMID: 26223837 DOI: 10.1111/apt.13329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The wireless motility capsule (WMC) offers the ability to investigate luminal gastrointestinal (GI) physiology in a minimally invasive manner. AIM To investigate the effect of testing protocol, gender, age and study country on regional GI transit times and associated pH values using the WMC. METHODS Regional GI transit times and pH values were determined in 215 healthy volunteers from USA and Sweden studied using the WMC over a 6.5-year period. The effects of test protocol, gender, age and study country were examined. RESULTS For GI transit times, testing protocol was associated with differences in gastric emptying time (GET; shorter with protocol 2 (motility capsule ingested immediately after meal) vs. protocol 1 (motility capsule immediately before): median difference: 52 min, P = 0.0063) and colonic transit time (CTT; longer with protocol 2: median 140 min, P = 0.0189), but had no overall effect on whole gut transit time. Females had longer GET (by median 17 min, P = 0.0307), and also longer CTT by (104 min, P = 0.0285) and whole gut transit time by (263 min, P = 0.0077). Increasing age was associated with shorter small bowel transit time (P = 0.002), and study country also influenced small bowel and CTTs. Whole gut and CTTs showed clustering of data at values separated by 24 h, suggesting that describing these measures as continuous variables is invalid. Testing protocol, gender and study country also significantly influenced pH values. CONCLUSIONS Regional GI transit times and pH values, delineated using the wireless motility capsule (WMC), vary based on testing protocol, gender, age and country. Standardisation of testing is crucial for cross-referencing in clinical practice and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y T Wang
- Neurogastroenterology Group (GI Physiology Unit), Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - S D Mohammed
- Neurogastroenterology Group (GI Physiology Unit), Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| | - A D Farmer
- Neurogastroenterology Group (GI Physiology Unit), Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary University, London, UK.,University Hospitals of North Midlands, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | - D Wang
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - N Zarate
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - P M Hellström
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - B Kuo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S S Rao
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Georgia Health Sciences University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - W L Hasler
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - M Camilleri
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research (CENTER), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - S M Scott
- Neurogastroenterology Group (GI Physiology Unit), Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gwee KA, Ghoshal UC, Gonlachanvit S, Chua ASB, Myung SJ, Rajindrajith S, Patcharatrakul T, Choi MG, Wu JCY, Chen MH, Gong XR, Lu CL, Chen CL, Pratap N, Abraham P, Hou XH, Ke M, Ricaforte-Campos JD, Syam AF, Abdullah M. Primary Care Management of Chronic Constipation in Asia: The ANMA Chronic Constipation Tool. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 19:149-60. [PMID: 23667746 PMCID: PMC3644651 DOI: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.2.149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2013] [Revised: 03/17/2013] [Accepted: 03/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic constipation (CC) may impact on quality of life. There is substantial patient dissatisfaction; possible reasons are failure to recognize underlying constipation, inappropriate dietary advice and inadequate treatment. The aim of these practical guidelines intended for primary care physicians, and which are based on Asian perspectives, is to provide an approach to CC that is relevant to the existing health-care infrastructure. Physicians should not rely on infrequent bowel movements to diagnose CC as many patients have one or more bowel movement a day. More commonly, patients present with hard stool, straining, incomplete feeling, bloating and other dyspeptic symptoms. Physicians should consider CC in these situations and when patients are found to use laxative containing supplements. In the absence of alarm features physicians may start with a 2-4 week therapeutic trial of available pharmacological agents including osmotic, stimulant and enterokinetic agents. Where safe to do so, physicians should consider regular (as opposed to on demand dosing), combination treatment and continuous treatment for at least 4 weeks. If patients do not achieve satisfactory response, they should be referred to tertiary centers for physiological evaluation of colonic transit and pelvic floor function. Surgical referral is a last resort, which should be considered only after a thorough physiological and psychological evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kok-Ann Gwee
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zarate N, Mohammed SD, O'Shaughnessy E, Newell M, Yazaki E, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ, Semler JR, Scott SM. Accurate localization of a fall in pH within the ileocecal region: validation using a dual-scintigraphic technique. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2010; 299:G1276-86. [PMID: 20847301 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00127.2010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Stereotypical changes in pH occur along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Classically, there is an abrupt increase in pH on exit from the stomach, followed later by a sharp fall in pH, attributed to passage through the ileocecal region. However, the precise location of this latter pH change has never been conclusively substantiated. We aimed to determine the site of fall in pH using a dual-scintigraphic technique. On day 1, 13 healthy subjects underwent nasal intubation with a 3-m-long catheter, which was allowed to progress to the distal ileum. On day 2, subjects ingested a pH-sensitive wireless motility capsule labeled with 4 MBq (51)Chromium [EDTA]. The course of this, as it travelled through the GI tract, was assessed with a single-headed γ-camera using static and dynamic scans. Capsule progression was plotted relative to a background of 4 MBq ¹¹¹Indium [diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid] administered through the catheter. Intraluminal pH, as recorded by the capsule, was monitored continuously, and position of the capsule relative to pH was established. A sharp fall in pH was recorded in all subjects; position of the capsule relative to this was accurately determined anatomically in 9/13 subjects. In these nine subjects, a pH drop of 1.5 ± 0.2 U, from 7.6 ± 0.05 to 6.1 ± 0.1 occurred a median of 7.5 min (1-16) after passage through the ileocecal valve; location was either in the cecum (n = 5), ascending colon (n = 2), or coincident with a move from the cecum to ascending colon (n = 2). This study provides conclusive evidence that the fall in pH seen within the ileocolonic region actually occurs in the proximal colon. This phenomenon can be used as a biomarker of transition between the small and large bowel and validates assessment of regional GI motility using capsule technology that incorporates pH measurement.
Collapse
|
7
|
Bacterial overgrowth and methane production in children with encopresis. J Pediatr 2010; 156:766-70, 770.e1. [PMID: 20036380 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.10.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2009] [Revised: 09/14/2009] [Accepted: 10/30/2009] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and methane production in children with encopresis. STUDY DESIGN Radiographic fecal impaction (FI) scores were assessed in children with secondary, retentive encopresis and compared with the breath test results. Breath tests with hypoosmotic lactulose solution were performed in both the study patients (n = 50) and gastrointestinal control subjects (n = 39) groups. RESULTS The FI scores were significantly higher in the patients with encopresis who were methane producers (P < .01). SIBO was diagnosed in 21 of 50 (42%) patients with encopresis and 9 of 39 (23%) of control subjects (P = .06). Methane was produced in 56% of the patients with encopresis versus 23.1% of the control subjects in the gastrointestinal group (P < .01). Fasting methane level was elevated in 48% versus 10.3 %, respectively (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Children with FI and encopresis had a higher prevalence of SIBO, elevated basal methane levels, and higher methane production. Methane production was associated with more severe colonic impaction. Further study is needed to determine whether methane production is a primary or secondary factor in the pathogenesis of SIBO and encopresis.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Disorders of colonic motor and sensory function are common among children and adults and pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges; the purpose of this review, therefore, was to critically assess the recent literature on this topic. RECENT FINDINGS Considerable progress has been made at the ultrastructural, molecular and electrophysiological level in understanding the normal functions of the muscles, nerves and interstitial cells that generate and control colonic motility. Furthermore, abnormalities in these cell types and in the interstitial cells of Cajal, in particular, have been identified in a number of disease states. Testing of colonic motor and sensory function in clinical practice continues to be a challenge due, in part, not only to the technical issues presented by accessing the organ but also to the intrinsic variability of its physiology. These have not been auspicious times for advances in the therapy of disturbed colonic motility; new agents or new applications for 'old' agents continue to be explored as are more innovative approaches such as those based on neural stimulation and cell therapy. SUMMARY Considerable progress has been made in understanding the basic pathophysiology of colonic dysmotility; clinical diagnostics and therapeutics continue to lag behind.
Collapse
|