1
|
Scarpignato C, Hunt RH. Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers: Current Clinical Use and Future Developments. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11894-024-00939-3. [PMID: 39145848 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-024-00939-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW Acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represents the standard of care in the treatment of acid-related diseases. However, despite their effectiveness, PPIs display some intrinsic limitations, which underlie the unmet clinical needs that have been identified over the past decades. The aims of this review are to summarize the current status and future development of the new class of antisecretory drugs (potassium-competitive acid blockers, P-CABs) that have recently been introduced into medical practice. RECENT FINDINGS Over the past decades, clinical needs unmet by the current acid suppressants have been recognized, especially in the management of patients with GERD, Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAID-related peptic ulcer. The failure to address these needs is mainly due to their inability to achieve a consistent acid suppression in all patients and, particularly, to control nighttime acidity. It was then realized that an extended duration of acid suppression would exert additional benefits. The available data with P-CABs show that they are able to address these unmet clinical needs. Four different P-CABs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan and keverprazan) are currently available. However, only two of them are approved outside Asia. Vonoprazan is available in North, Central and South America while tegoprazan is marketed only in Latin American countries. Two other compounds (namely linazapran glurate and zestaprazan) are presently under clinical development. While clinical trials on GERD have been performed with all P-CABs, only vonoprazan and tegoprazan have been investigated as components of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. The available data show that-in the above two clinical indications-P-CABs provide similar or better efficacy in comparison with PPIs. Their safety in the short-term overlaps that of PPIs, but data from long-term treatment are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelo Scarpignato
- Department of Medicine & Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
- Department of Health Sciences, United Campus of Malta, Msida, Malta.
- Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
| | - Richard H Hunt
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive, Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Agago DE, Hanif N, Ajay Kumar AS, Arsalan M, Kaur Dhanjal M, Hanif L, Wei CR. Comparison of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Cureus 2024; 16:e65141. [PMID: 39176368 PMCID: PMC11338695 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) compared to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, and 11 randomized controlled trials comparing PCABs with PPIs were included. The primary outcome was the healing of erosive esophagitis (EE), with secondary outcomes, including relief of heartburn symptoms and adverse events. The analysis included 11 studies and a pooled sample of 4,108 GERD patients. Results showed that PCABs were significantly more effective in healing EE compared to PPIs (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.24-2.24, p<0.01). PCABs also demonstrated a higher rate of complete resolution of heartburn symptoms, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.98-2.09, p=0.06). In terms of safety, there was no significant difference in adverse events between PCABs and PPIs (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.79-1.04, p=0.18), including serious adverse events. The superior efficacy of PCABs can be attributed to their unique pharmacological properties, which allow for more rapid and potent acid suppression compared to PPIs. However, the long-term safety profile of PCABs, particularly newer agents, requires further investigation. The study was limited by the predominance of vonoprazan among the PCABs studied and the focus on patients with EE rather than non-erosive reflux disease. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that PCABs are more effective than PPIs in treating GERD, particularly in healing EE, while maintaining a comparable safety profile. Future research should focus on evaluating a wider range of PCABs, assessing their efficacy in non-erosive reflux disease, and investigating their long-term safety in GERD management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Najma Hanif
- Medicine, Sindh Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| | | | | | | | - Lubna Hanif
- Medicine, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, PAK
| | - Calvin R Wei
- Research and Development, Shing Huei Group, Taipei, TWN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu Y, Gao Z, Hou X. Potassium-competitive acid blockers and proton-pump inhibitors for healing of erosive esophagitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2024; 17:17562848241251567. [PMID: 38903448 PMCID: PMC11189022 DOI: 10.1177/17562848241251567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are recommended for erosive esophagitis (EE), with good safety and tolerance. However, it is unclear which is the best treatment option for EE. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of P-CABs and PPIs for healing EE patients, seeking an appropriate treatment choice in the 4- or 8-week treatment and standard or double dose. Design A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data sources and methods Relevant databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of PPIs and P-CABs in the treatment of EE up to 31 May 2023. Studies on standard or double-dose PPIs or P-CABs which were published in English and assessed 4- or 8-week healing effects in EE were included. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments under the frequentist framework. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses of patients with different baseline EE were also conducted. Results In all, 34 studies involving 25,054 patients and 9 PPIs, 6 P-CABs, or placebo treatment interventions were included. The pooled 4-week healing rate was significantly statistically lower than the pooled 8-week healing rate for most treatments. Besides, the higher healing rate of double-dose treatment than standard-dose treatment was not observed in the initial treatment of most drugs. The main analysis only included studies conducted for both patients with and without severe EE at baseline, and the proportion of severe EE included in the study was >10%, Keverprazan 20 mg qd ranked best with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value of 84.7, followed by Ilaprazole 10 mg qd with a SUCRA value of 82.0, for the healing rate at 8 weeks. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. Subgroup analysis showed that most P-CABs had higher healing rates than PPIs, particularly for patients with severe EE. And the healing rate of Keverprazan 20 mg qd at 8 weeks ranked best in the subgroup without or with severe EE at baseline. Conclusion This study showed that an 8-week treatment seemed more effective than the 4-week treatment for healing EE patients. The healing effect of Keverprazan (20 mg qd) ranked best in 8-week treatment, for both severe and non-severe EE patients. Trial registration The study protocol was registered with INPLASY (registration number INPLASY2023120053).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Liu
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhifeng Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First People’s Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou, China
| | - XiaoHua Hou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 430022 Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Simadibrata DM, Lesmana E, Fass R. Vonoprazan is superior to lansoprazole for healing of severe but not mild erosive esophagitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:988-999. [PMID: 38353152 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Healing rates of severe erosive esophagitis (EE; Los Angeles [LA] Grade C/D) in patients treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is suboptimal (~60-70%). Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is suggested to have better healing rates in patients with severe EE. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 mg versus lansoprazole 30 mg daily in healing EE, specifically in those with LA Grade C/D. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL on May 24, 2023. Studies that randomized EE patients to vonoprazan 20 mg daily or lansoprazole 30 mg daily and compared healing rates were included. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool. The fixed-effect model was used to obtain the pooled efficacy and safety outcomes. Subgroup analysis was done to compare healing rates in mild (LA Grade A/B) versus severe EE and based on study location. RESULTS Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risks of bias comprising 2208 participants were included. Vonoprazan 20 mg was superior to lansoprazole 30 mg daily in healing severe EE at all weeks (Week 2 RR 1.294 [95% CI 1.169-1.433], Week 4 1.160 [1.059-1.270], and Week 8 1.175 [95% CI 1.107-1.247]), but was similar for mild EE at all weeks (P-interaction < 0.01). Vonoprazan 20 mg was more efficacious than lansoprazole 30 mg at Week 8 in Western versus Asian studies (P-interaction < 0.01). Any, serious, and drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION Vonoprazan 20 mg is superior to lansoprazole 30 mg for healing severe EE but not mild EE. Vonoprazan 20 mg daily has a similar safety profile to lansoprazole 30 mg daily.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Martin Simadibrata
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elvira Lesmana
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Ronnie Fass
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, MetroHealth Medical System, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moraes-Filho JPP, Domingues G, Chinzon D. BRAZILIAN CLINICAL GUIDELINE FOR THE THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (BRAZILIAN FEDERATION OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, FBG). ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2024; 61:e23154. [PMID: 38511797 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.24612023-154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition in Brazil, affecting 12% to 20% of the urban population, with significant implications for patient quality of life and potential for complications. OBJECTIVE This paper focuses on the recent update of the Brazilian guidelines for GERD, a necessary revision due to advancements in knowledge and practice since the last publication over a decade ago. The update pays particular attention to the role and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), acknowledging the growing concerns about their long-term use, adverse events, and overprescription. METHODS The methodology of the guideline update involved an extensive literature review in multiple languages (English, French, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese), drawing from major databases such as Medline, Embase, and SciELO-Lilacs. RESULTS This comprehensive approach resulted in a carefully curated selection of studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, specifically focusing on PPIs and other therapeutic strategies for GERD. The updated guidelines are presented in a user-friendly question-and-answer format, adhering to the PICO system (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) for clarity and ease of interpretation. The recommendations are supported by robust scientific evidence and expert opinions, enhancing their practical applicability in clinical settings. To ensure the reliability and clarity of the recommendations, the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was employed. This system categorizes the strength of recommendations as strong, weak, or conditional and classifies evidence quality as high, moderate, low, or very low. These classifications provide insight into the confidence level of each recommendation and the likelihood of future research impacting these guidelines. CONCLUSION The primary aim of these updated guidelines is to offer practical, evidence-based advice for the management of GERD in Brazil, ensuring that healthcare professionals are equipped with the latest knowledge and tools to deliver optimal patient care. BACKGROUND •Gastrointestinal specialists rely heavily on guidelines to manage digestive pathologies effectively. The Brazilian clinical guideline for therapeutic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an invaluable tool for these specialists. BACKGROUND •It critically analyzes practical aspects of therapy through 12 questions covering a wide range of topics, from behavioral measures to surgical and endoscopic indications. BACKGROUND •The recommendations in this guideline are justified using the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation), and experienced experts provide comments and suggestions at the end of each question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerson Domingues
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
| | - Decio Chinzon
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhong S, Zhong M, Fang L, Zhi H, Ji X, Tang K, Zhan C, Shi X, Xian M, Wang W, Li J, Luo W, Lai K, Chen R. Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker Versus Proton Pump Inhibitor: A Pilot Study on Comparable Efficacy in the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux-Related Cough. ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2024; 16:191-201. [PMID: 38528386 DOI: 10.4168/aair.2024.16.2.191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Acid inhibitors have been considered in treating gastroesophageal reflux-related cough (GERC). Compared to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have more potent and durable effects on anti-acid secretion. However, whether vonoprazan and esomeprazole have different therapeutic effects on GERC remains unknown. Patients diagnosed with GERC were enrolled in our study and randomly treated with vonoprazan (20 mg, once daily, P-CAB) or esomeprazole (20 mg, twice daily, PPI) for two months. A prokinetic agent was also administered. Patients were followed up once a month. Cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) was measured as the primary outcome, while cough symptom score (CSS) and scores for cough-related quality-of-life or reflux-related symptoms were the secondary endpoints. A total of 50 patients completed the study, with 25 patients in each group. P-CAB and PPI groups showed similar decreases in cough severity VAS and CSS scores after the 2-month treatment (all P < 0.001). For quality-of-life, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score increased significantly from baseline in both groups, but the P-CAB group had greater improvement and a higher LCQ score in month 2 (all P ≤ 0.05). For reflux-related symptoms, the Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ) score declined substantially over time in the P-CAB group, while the reflux symptom index (RSI) score decreased in both groups. The P-CAB group tended to have a lower HARQ (P = 0.051) and RSI (P = 0.069) scores in month 2. In conclusion, vonoprazan may be comparable to esomeprazole in cough symptom relief in GERC during the 2-month treatment period, but possibly provides better gains on classic reflux symptoms and quality-of-life. The long-term efficacy of P-CABs on GERC may be worth further exploration. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200067089.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuxin Zhong
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Mingyu Zhong
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Liman Fang
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Haopeng Zhi
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaolong Ji
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Kailun Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chen Zhan
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xu Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Mo Xian
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wanjun Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jing Li
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wei Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Kefang Lai
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| | - Ruchong Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Simadibrata DM, Lesmana E, Pratama MIA, Sugiharta AJ, Winarizal AS, Lee YY, Syam AF. A systematic review with meta-analysis: Efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blocker compared with proton pump inhibitor in the maintenance of healed erosive esophagitis. JGH Open 2024; 8:e13053. [PMID: 38523708 PMCID: PMC10958938 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.13053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is the mainstay therapy for the maintenance of healed erosive esophagitis (EE). It is unknown whether potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) are more efficacious and safer than PPIs. Methods Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCABs to PPIs in the maintenance of healing rates of endoscopically proven healed EE and indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL until 3 February 2024, were included. A fixed-effects model meta-analysis was performed to pool primary efficacy outcome (maintenance of healing rates at week 24) and safety data (any treatment-emergent adverse event or TEAE). The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool. Results Four RCTs with a total of 2554 patients were eligible for inclusion. All trials were of low risk of bias. Compared to lansoprazole 15 mg, the maintenance rates of healed EE at week 24 were significantly higher with vonoprazan 10 mg (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.07-1.19) and vonoprazan 20 mg (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.10-1.21). Likewise, compared to lansoprazole 15 mg, any TEAEs were significantly greater with vonoprazan 20 mg (RR 1.10; 95% CI 1.01-1.20) but not vonoprazan 10 mg. Conclusion Vonoprazan 10 and 20 mg were superior to lansoprazole 15 mg in the maintenance of the healing of EE. Any TEAEs were greater with vonoprazan 20 mg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Simadibrata
- Faculty of Medicine Universitas IndonesiaJakartaIndonesia
- Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Elvira Lesmana
- Faculty of Medicine Universitas IndonesiaJakartaIndonesia
| | | | | | | | - Yeong Y Lee
- School of Medical SciencesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaKota BharuMalaysia
- GI Function and Motility Unit, Hospital USMKota BharuMalaysia
| | - Ari F Syam
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal MedicineFaculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia—Ciptomangkunkusumo General HospitalJakartaIndonesia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang H, Zhang M, Ma G, Yang J, Wang K, Jiang S, Dong J, Han Y. Meta-analysis of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy using vonoprazan as an acid suppressor compared with bismuth quadruple therapy. Helicobacter 2024; 29:e13059. [PMID: 38443329 DOI: 10.1111/hel.13059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vonoprazan, a novel acid suppressant, has recently emerged as a regimen for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. However, uncertainties exist about the effectiveness and safety of VPZ-based regimens compared with those of bismuth-based quadruple therapy in eradicating H. pylori. The present meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness and safety of vonoprazan-based regimens with those of bismuth quadruple therapy in eradicating H. pylori. MATERIALS AND METHODS All randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials comparing the vonoprazan-based therapy with the bismuth quadruple therapy were included in this meta-analysis. Information was also extracted by two evaluators, and if heterogeneity existed, a random-effects model was used to calculate the combined relative ratio and 95% confidence interval; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. And subgroup analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS A total of 10 studies, comprising 2587 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the combined eradication rate of patients treated with the vonoprazan-based regimen was significantly higher than that of patients treated with bismuth quadruple therapy, in both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, and the differences were statistically significant. Among the intention-to-treat analyses results: (90.28% vs. 83.64% [odds ratio (OR) = 1.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.27, 2.70), p = 0.001]); in the per-protocol analyses: (94.80% vs. 89.88%, [OR = 2.25, 95% CI (1.37, 3.69), p = 0.001]). The occurrence of adverse events was significantly lower in patients treated with vonoprazan-based regimens than in those treated with bismuth quadruple therapy, (14.50% vs. 25.89%, [OR = 0.49, 95% CI (0.32, 0.75), p = 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS For eradicating H. pylori, vonoprazan-based regimens are remarkably advantageous over bismuth quadruple therapy. Furthermore, vonoprazan-based regimens exhibit a lower rate of adverse events than bismuth quadruple therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
- Yan'an University School of Medicine, Yan'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Miao Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Gang Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jiaqi Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Kemei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Shuangshuang Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Jiaqiang Dong
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Ying Han
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shimamura Y, Inoue H, Tanabe M, Ushikubo K, Yamamoto K, Kimoto Y, Nishikawa Y, Ando R, Sumi K, Navarro MJ, Teruel Sanchez-Vegazo C, Peñas B, Parejo S, Martínez Sánchez A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Onimaru M, Albillos A, Rodriguez de Santiago E. Clinical outcomes of anti-reflux mucosal ablation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: An international bi-institutional study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:149-156. [PMID: 37787176 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Anti-reflux mucosal ablation (ARMA) is an emerging endoscopic treatment aimed at enhancing the gastroesophageal junction flap valve. This study aimed to evaluate its feasibility, effectiveness, and safety. METHODS Between May 2018 and December 2022, patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms refractory to acid suppression medications or those dependent on such medications were enrolled for ARMA. This retrospective analysis utilized prospectively collected data from an international bi-center study. GERD questionnaire, upper endoscopy, and 24-h pH monitoring were conducted at 2-6 months and 12 months post-ARMA. Clinical success was defined as a > 50% reduction in a validated GERD questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 68 patients underwent ARMA. Definitive GERD was diagnosed in 44 (64.7%) patients, while 24 (35.3%) exhibited reflux hypersensitivity. Clinical success rates at 2-6 months and 1 year post-ARMA were 60% (39/65) and 70% (21/30), respectively. The median GERD-health-related quality of life score significantly improved from 26 to 11 at 2-6 months (P < 0.001). Among the 51 patients (71.8%) who underwent 24-h pH monitoring, the median acid exposure time decreased from 5.3% to 0.7% (P = 0.003), accompanied by a significant reduction in esophagitis rates (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis did not identify predictors of short-term success. Nine (13.2%) patients experienced transient stenosis requiring balloon dilation. CONCLUSIONS ARMA demonstrates both technical feasibility and reproducibility as a safe procedure that effectively ameliorates GERD symptoms in approximately two-thirds of patients during short-term follow up. Both reflux hypersensitivity and confirmed GERD patients, regardless of their response to acid suppression medication, may be suitable candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuto Shimamura
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruhiro Inoue
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayo Tanabe
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kei Ushikubo
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuki Yamamoto
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Kimoto
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yohei Nishikawa
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryohei Ando
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuya Sumi
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marc Julius Navarro
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Carlos Teruel Sanchez-Vegazo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el Área temática de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Peñas
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el Área temática de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sofía Parejo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el Área temática de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Alba Martínez Sánchez
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el Área temática de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el Área temática de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Manabu Onimaru
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Agustín Albillos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el Área temática de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Rodriguez de Santiago
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en el Área temática de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang D, Zhou D, Liu X, Xu Z, Bai T, Hou X. Different dosages of vonoprazan for gastroesophageal reflux disease: study protocol for a pragmatic, crossover-cluster, randomized controlled trial with patient preference arms. Trials 2023; 24:778. [PMID: 38041136 PMCID: PMC10691065 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07760-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vonoprazan results in more potent acid suppression for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) than proton pump inhibitors. It has only been approved for treating erosive esophagitis in China, but 30-40% of GERD patients cannot achieve the goal of treatment with vonoprazan 20 mg daily. This study aims to investigate whether vonoprazan could relieve the symptoms of Chinese patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and whether increased dosage or different times of dosing could increase the response rate of GERD. METHODS This study is a pragmatic, open-label, crossover-cluster, randomized controlled trial with patient preference arms. Two thousand eight hundred eighty patients with GERD from 48 hospitals in China will be enrolled. These hospitals will be divided into a compulsory randomization cluster (24 hospitals) and a patient preference cluster (24 hospitals). Patients in the compulsory randomization cluster will be randomized to three regimens according to the crossover-cluster randomization. Patients in the patient preference cluster may choose to receive any regimen if they have a preference; otherwise, patients will be randomly assigned. The three treatment regimens will last 4 weeks, including (1) vonoprazan 20 mg p.o. after breakfast, (2) vonoprazan 20 mg p.o. after dinner, and (3) vonoprazan 20 mg p.o. after breakfast and after dinner. Patients will attend a baseline visit, a 4-week e-diary, a fourth-week visit, and a sixth-month visit online. The primary outcome is the symptom relief rate of all patients after 4-week therapy. Secondary outcomes include the healing rate of EE patients, the severity of symptoms, compliance with the therapy at the fourth-week follow-up visit, recurrent symptoms, and the frequency of self-conscious doctor visits at the sixth-month follow-up visit. DISCUSSION This trial will explore the effectiveness of different regimens of vonoprazan that will be implemented with GERD patients in China. The randomization with patient preferences considered and the crossover-cluster component may improve the robustness and extrapolation of study conclusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION https://www.chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2300069857. Registered on 28 March 2023. PROTOCOL VERSION February 18, 2023, Version 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongke Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Dan Zhou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xinghuang Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiyue Xu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Tao Bai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| | - Xiaohua Hou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chandan S, Deliwala S, Mohan BP, Ramai D, Dhindsa B, Bapaye J, Kassab LL, Chandan OC, Facciorusso A, Adler DG. Vonoprazan versus lansoprazole in erosive esophagitis - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Indian J Gastroenterol 2023; 42:475-484. [PMID: 37418052 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01384-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the mainstay of treatment in erosive esophagitis (EE). An alternative to PPIs in EE is Vonoprazan, a potassium competitive acid blocker. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing vonoprazan to lansoprazole. METHODS Multiple databases searched through November 2022. Meta-analysis was performed to assess endoscopic healing at two, four and eight weeks, including for patients with severe EE (Los Angeles C/D). Serious adverse events (SAE) leading to drug discontinuation were assessed. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. RESULTS Four RCTs with 2208 patients were included in the final analysis. Vonoprazan 20 mg once-daily was compared to lansoprazole 30 mg once-daily dosing. Among all patients, at two and eight weeks post-treatment, vonoprazan resulted in significantly higher rates of endoscopic healing as compared to lansoprazole, risk ratios (RR) 1.1, p<0.001 and RR 1.04, p=0.03. The same effect was not observed at four weeks, RR 1.03 (CI 0.99-1.06, I2=0%) following therapy. Among patients with severe EE, vonoprazan resulted in higher rates of endoscopic healing at two weeks, RR 1.3 (1.2-1.4, I2=47%), p=<0.001, at four weeks, RR 1.2 (1.1-1.3, I2=36%), p=<0.001 and at eight weeks post-treatment, RR 1.1 (CI 1.03-1.3, I2=79%), p=0.009. We found no significant difference in the overall pooled rate of SAE and pooled rate of adverse events leading to drug discontinuation. Finally, the overall certainty of evidence for our main summary estimates was rated as high (grade A). CONCLUSION Based on limited number of published non-inferiority RCTs, our analysis demonstrates that among patients with EE, vonoprazan 20 mg once-daily dosing achieves comparable and in those with severe EE, higher endoscopic healing rates as compared to lansoprazole 30 mg once-daily dosing. Both drugs have a comparable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Smit Deliwala
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Banreet Dhindsa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center|, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Jay Bapaye
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Lena L Kassab
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ojasvini Choudhry Chandan
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Centura Health, Denver, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
He J, Gao Y, Bai G, Wang J, Sun Y. Network meta-analysis of multiple doses of vonoprazan for the treatment of erosive esophagitis. J Comp Eff Res 2023; 12:e220165. [PMID: 37470274 PMCID: PMC10508317 DOI: 10.57264/cer-2022-0165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: 20 mg of vonoprazan (VPZ20) is recommended in most countries to treat erosive esophagitis (EE). Whether other doses of vonoprazan, such as 5 mg (VPZ5), 10 mg (VPZ10), 20 mg (VPZ20), and 40 mg (VPZ40) are more effective is unknown. Materials & methods: Three databases were electronically searched to identify studies published before November 2021. Network meta-analysis was performed using STATA 14.0. Results: VPZ20 and VPZ40 were comparable to PPI, VPZ5 and VPZ10 in 4- and 8-week healing rates, and this was also detected in patients with refractory EE. All regimens resulted in similar treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). However, VPZ40 ranked first for healing rate and TEAEs; however, VPZ20 ranked worst for TEAEs. Conclusion: Different doses of VPZ are comparable in efficacy and safety, but VPZ40 may be best in both effectiveness and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie He
- Gastrology/Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200000, China
| | - Yuanyuan Gao
- Apartment of Mental disease/Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200000, Shanghai, China
| | - Ge Bai
- Oncology/Shanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030000, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Gastrology/Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200000, China
| | - Yongshun Sun
- Gastrology/Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200000, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xu W, Bai Z, Shang Y, Wang J, Wong Y, Qi X. Incidence and type of adverse events in patients taking vonoprazan: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231167858. [PMID: 37113190 PMCID: PMC10126681 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231167858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Vonoprazan, a novel acid-suppressive drug, is non-inferior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the management of gastric acid-related diseases. However, the safety of vonoprazan has not been systematically evaluated yet. Objectives To elucidate the incidence and type of adverse events (AEs) in patients taking vonoprazan. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources and methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all studies reporting the safety of vonoprazan. The incidences of any AEs, drug-related AEs, serious AEs, AEs leading to drug discontinuation, and common AEs were pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the incidence of AEs between patients taking vonoprazan and PPIs. Results Seventy-seven studies were included. The pooled incidences of any AEs, drug-related AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to drug discontinuation were 20, 7, 1, and 1%, respectively. The incidences of any AEs (OR = 0.96, p = 0.66), drug-related AEs (OR = 1.10, p = 0.44), serious AEs (OR = 1.14, p = 0.36), and AEs leading to drug discontinuation (OR = 1.09, p = 0.55) were not significantly different between patients taking vonoprazan and PPIs. In subgroup analyses, patients with peptic ulcer disease (PUD) had higher incidences of any AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to drug discontinuation than those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, and artificial ulcer after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), but patients with H. pylori infection had a higher incidence of drug-related AEs than those with PUD, GERD, and artificial ulcer after gastric ESD. The incidence of AEs was higher in patients taking long-term use of vonoprazan than those taking short-term use of vonoprazan. Conclusion Vonoprazan is well tolerated and shows similar safety compared to PPIs. The safety of vonoprazan may be primarily influenced by its indications and duration. Registration PROSPERO CRD42022314982.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Yujun Wong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tack J, Vladimirov B, Horny I, Chong CF, Eisner J, Czerniak R, Takanami Y. Randomized clinical trial: A double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 or 40 mg versus esomeprazole 40 mg in patients with symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux disease and partial response to a healing dose of a proton-pump inhibitor. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 35:e14468. [PMID: 36178335 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are cornerstone treatments for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, evidence suggests that most patients exhibit partial response to PPIs, suggesting the need for novel therapies that can provide an improved and sustained increase in gastric pH. AIMS This study aimed to determine the effect of vonoprazan, a novel, orally active small-molecule potassium-competitive acid blocker, versus esomeprazole, a PPI, in preventing heartburn symptoms over a 4-week treatment period in patients with GERD and a partial response to esomeprazole treatment. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, proof-of-concept, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted between 2016 and 2018 at 39 sites across Europe and designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 mg once daily (q.d.) and 40 mg q.d. versus esomeprazole 40 mg q.d. after 1:1:1 randomization of symptomatic patients with GERD and a partial response to a healing dose of esomeprazole. RESULTS Overall, 256 eligible patients (female, 59.4%; mean age, 52.6 years) received vonoprazan 20 mg (n = 85), vonoprazan 40 mg (n = 85), or esomeprazole 40 mg (n = 86); mean (SD) percentages of heartburn-free 24-h periods during double-blind treatment were 36.7% (33.4%), 36.5% (35.6%), and 38.4% (34.8%), respectively, with no intergroup statistical significance. Vonoprazan exposure increased proportionally from the 20-mg to 40-mg dose (mean Cmax : 23.3 ng/ml to 47.1 ng/ml, respectively). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild, with no deaths reported. CONCLUSIONS No statistically significant difference in efficacy and safety was observed among treatment groups, and vonoprazan was well tolerated. The trial is registered with the National Board of Health (EudraCT: 2015-001154-14) database.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Tack
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Borislav Vladimirov
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital "Queen Giovanna- ISUL", Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ivo Horny
- Department of Gastroenterology and Internal medicine, Strakonice Hospital, Czech Republic
| | - Chui Fung Chong
- Currently Hoffmann-La Roche, Formerly Takeda Development Center Asia, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jessica Eisner
- Formerly Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, USA
| | - Richard Czerniak
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yohei Takanami
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Simadibrata DM, Syam AF, Lee YY. A comparison of efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blocker and proton pump inhibitor in gastric acid-related diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37:2217-2228. [PMID: 36181401 PMCID: PMC10092067 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB) is a recent alternative to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for potent acid suppression. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PCAB versus PPI in treating gastric acid-related diseases. METHODS We searched up to June 5, 2022, for randomized controlled trials of gastric acid-related diseases that included erosive esophagitis, symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), peptic ulcers, and Helicobacter pylori infection. The pooled risk ratio (RR) was evaluated for the efficacy outcome and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) as the safety outcome. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the study findings. RESULTS Of the 710 screened studies, 19 studies including 7023 participants were analyzed. The RRs for the healing of erosive esophagitis with Vonoprazan versus PPI were 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.14), 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.07), and 1.02 (95% CI 1.00-1.05) in Weeks 2, 4, and 8, respectively. There were no differences in the improvement of GERD symptoms and healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers between PCAB and PPI. The pooled eradication rates of H. pylori were significantly higher in Vonoprazan versus PPI first-line treatment (RR 1.13; 95% CI 1.04-1.22). The overall RR of TEAEs with Vonoprazan versus PPI was 1.08 (95% CI 0.89-1.31). Overall, the risk of bias was low to some concerns. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the study's conclusion. CONCLUSION Vonoprazan is superior to PPI in first-line H. pylori eradication and erosive esophagitis but non-inferior in other gastric acid-related diseases. Likewise, short-term safety is comparable in both treatment groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ari Fahrial Syam
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia - Ciptomangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.,GI Function and Motility Unit, Hospital USM, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Meyer JC, MacBride-Stewart S, Fadare JO, Abdulrahman Jairoun A, Haque M, Massele A, Kumar S, Sefah IA, P Skosana P, Godman B. Key Considerations From a Health Authority Perspective When Proton Pump Inhibitors Are Used to Treat Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Their Implications. Cureus 2022; 14:e31918. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
17
|
Yang S, Deng W, Xie Z, Chen J. Efficacy and safety of proton pump inhibitors versus vonoprazan in treatment of erosive esophagitis: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e31807. [PMID: 36451489 PMCID: PMC9704910 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000031807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and vonoprazan are recommended as first-line therapies for erosive esophagitis (EE). However, it is uncertain how the magnitude of efficacy and safety of first-line therapy, the choice of individual PPIs or vonoprazan in the treatment of EE remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan and PPIs in healing esophageal mucosal injury in patients with EE. METHODS Relevant databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of proton pump inhibitors and vonoprazan in the treatment of reflux esophagitis up to December 2021. Studies on standard-dose PPIs or vonoprazan that were published in Chinese or English and assessed healing effects in EE were included in the analysis. Stata16.0 was used to conduct a network Meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the treatment. RESULTS A total of 41 literatures were included with 11,592 enrolled patients. For the endoscopic cure rate, all the PPIs and vonoprazan significantly improve compared to Placebo; Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, Ilaprazole ranked first, followed by esomeprazole, vonoprazan, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, rabeprazole and placebo therapy ranked the last. For the rate of adverse events, there was no significant difference among all the PPIs, vonoprazan, and placebo. CONCLUSIONS Ilaprazole, esomeprazole and vonoprazan have more advantages in mucosal erosion healing, there was no significant difference in the comparative safety among all interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sensen Yang
- Key Specialty of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weishang Deng
- Key Specialty of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zeyu Xie
- Key Specialty of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jisheng Chen
- Key Specialty of Clinical Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang M, Xiao Y, Chen M. The role of vonoprazan in patients with erosive esophagitis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221122623. [PMID: 36117573 PMCID: PMC9478709 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221122623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Acid suppression is the primary therapy for erosive esophagitis (EE). Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are considered as the first-line medication for EE, 10-20% of patients with Los Angeles C and D grade EE do not gain complete mucosal healing and symptom control despite 8-week double-dose PPI treatment. Vonoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), which blocks the H+, K+-adenosine triphosphatase enzymes in a K+-competitive and reversible manner. Vonoprazan exhibits different pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profiles from conventional PPIs, and has a rapid, potent and sustained acid inhibitory effect. In this review, we summarized and discussed current evidence regarding the role of vonoprazan in terms of mucosal healing, maintaining remission and symptom relief for the management of EE, including the initial and maintenance treatment of EE, as well as for PPI-resistant EE patients. Safety concerns and cost-effectiveness analysis of vonoprazan were also mentioned in the article. As a potent and well-tolerated acid blocker, vonoprazan has the potential to become a novel option for the management of EE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengyu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First
Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong
Province, China
| | - Yinglian Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First
Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong
Province, China
| | - Minhu Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First
Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan II Road,
Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510080, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang Z, Bao Y, Cai L, Gu Y, Yang T, Li X. Cost-Utility Analysis of CYP2C19 Genotype Detection for Selection of Acid-Suppressive Therapy with Lansoprazole or Vonoprazan for Patients with Reflux Esophagitis in China. Clin Drug Investig 2022; 42:839-851. [PMID: 35994227 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-022-01188-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype has a profound effect on the efficacy of lansoprazole, with less of an influence on vonoprazan. Both are first-choice drugs for the treatment of reflux esophagitis in China. OBJECTIVE We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of acid-suppressive treatments in Chinese patients with reflux esophagitis over 1 year from the societal perspective. METHODS We developed a decision-based Markov model with a 4-week cycle to simulate the economic benefits and quality-adjusted life-years between different treatment strategies for patients with reflux esophagitis: universal lansoprazole, universal vonoprazan, and CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategies. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Data sources were the published literature, clinical trials, documents, and local charges. We used sensitivity analyses to detect the robustness of the findings and explored subgroup analyses and scenario analyses to make further evaluations. RESULTS Compared to lansoprazole, vonoprazan and the CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategy were not preferable for Chinese patients with reflux esophagitis, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 222,387.1316 yuan/quality-adjusted life-year and 349,627.5000 yuan/quality-adjusted life-year, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed the impact factors were the utility scores and the expenditures for the maintenance stage with lansoprazole and vonoprazan. When the willingness-to-pay threshold was 215,484 yuan/quality-adjusted life-year, 46.20% of the reflux esophagitis population was willing to pay for vonoprazan, compared with 8.30% for the CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategies. Vonoprazan and the CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategy were cost effective in the severe reflux esophagitis population, and in the reduction of the price of vonoprazan. CONCLUSIONS The health economic evaluations revealed that for Chinese patients with reflux esophagitis, vonoprazan and the CYP2C19 genotype-guided strategy were not cost-effective regimens compared with lansoprazole. However, we found that in certain conditions like a reduction in the price of vonoprazan and in patients with severe reflux esophagitis these could be cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuolin Zhang
- School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuwen Bao
- School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Lele Cai
- School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yajie Gu
- School of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ting Yang
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Li
- School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China. .,Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Leowattana W, Leowattana T. Potassium-competitive acid blockers and gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:3608-3619. [PMID: 36161043 PMCID: PMC9372813 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i28.3608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), the most commonly used antisecretory medi-cations in the management of reflux illness, virtually eliminate elective surgery for ulcer disease, and relegate anti-reflux surgery to patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who are inadequately managed by medical therapy. However, PPI medications still leave some therapeutic demands of GERD unmet. Furthermore, up to 40%-55% of daily PPI users have chronic symptoms, due to PPI refractoriness. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) transcend many of the problems and limits of PPIs, delivering quick, powerful, and extended acid suppression and allowing for treatment of numerous unmet needs. Recently, it has become clear that compromised mucosal integrity plays a role in the etiology of GERD. As a result, esophageal mucosal protection has emerged as a novel and potential treatment approach. An increasing body of research demonstrates that when P-CABs are used as primary drugs or add-on drugs (to regular treatment), they provide a considerable extra benefit, particularly in alleviating symptoms that do not respond to PPI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wattana Leowattana
- Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Tawithep Leowattana
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok 10110, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Savarino V, Antonioli L, Fornai M, Marabotto E, Demarzo MG, Zingone F, Ghisa M, Barberio B, Zentilin P, Ribolsi M, Savarino E. An update of pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of vonoprazan in acid-related disorders. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:401-410. [PMID: 34550866 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1984878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with acid-related disorders (ARDs) of the upper digestive tract remain highly prevalent and need to be continuously investigated to improve their management. AREAS COVERED This review provides a summary of the most recent advancements in the treatment of ARDs with particular focus on the new drugs available to overcome the unmet needs of traditional therapies. EXPERT OPINION Proton pump inhibitors remain the best therapy in treating ARDs, but a consistent proportion of these patients continues to present mucosal lesions or to experience symptoms despite treatment. These cases pertain mainly to the most severe forms of erosive esophagitis or to non-erosive reflux disease. Also, the increasing rate of patients with H. pylori infection not responding to eradication therapy represents a difficult clinical condition. The recent advent of a new class of antisecretory drugs, such as the potassium competitive acid blockers and, among them the most studied vonoprazan, which are characterized by a better pharmacological profile than PPIs (rapid onset of action, longer lasting acid suppression, control of nocturnal acidity), has the potential to overcome the above-mentioned unmet needs. More research should be done to assess their efficacy in Western populations and their safety in patients treated in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Antonioli
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Fornai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Marabotto
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Giulia Demarzo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fabiana Zingone
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Matteo Ghisa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Brigida Barberio
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Patrizia Zentilin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Mentore Ribolsi
- Gastroenterology Unit, Departmental Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Cheng Y, Kou F, Zhang X, Dai Y, Shi L, Xie C, Li X, Li J. Network Pharmacology Analysis of Hewei Jiangni Granule for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Experimental Verification of Its Anti-Neurogenic Inflammation Mechanism. Drug Des Devel Ther 2022; 16:1349-1363. [PMID: 35547866 PMCID: PMC9084909 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s348985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Proton pump inhibitors, as the first-line drugs for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), are unable to completely relieve patients’ symptoms and patients are prone to recurrence after prolonged drug withdrawal. Thus, it is crucial to find herbal medicines as a complementary and alternative treatment. Hewei Jiangni granule (HWJNG) is a classical Chinese medicinal formula with clinical therapeutic effects on GERD, but its pharmacological mechanism of action remains unclear. This study aimed to explore and then verify the pharmacological mechanisms of HWJNG in GERD therapy. Methods A network pharmacology approach was applied to explore and then verify the pharmacological mechanisms of HWJNG in GERD therapy. The active ingredients of HWJNG, as well as therapeutic targets of GERD were acquired from specialized databases. The “herb-ingredient-gene-target” network for HWJNG in GERD treatment was built. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed to screen the core coincident targets. Then, gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed. The core targets and signaling pathways associated with the anti-neurogenic inflammatory effect were partially verified via experiments in vivo at molecular level. Results In total, 179 chemical ingredients in HWJNG and 298 intersection targets between GERD and HWJNG were selected from databases. A large proportion of core targets and top signaling pathways were involved in neurogenic inflammation. HWJNG significantly alleviated pathological injuries of esophagus and reversed dilated intracellular spaces. Additionally, HWJNG markedly inhibited the excessive release of inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNF-a), as well as regulated stimulation sensors including transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) and its related neuroinflammatory mediators in GERD mice. Conclusion HWJNG is a promising therapeutic strategy for GERD treatment via regulation of multiple targets and pathways, its effects in alleviating neurogenic inflammation are especially acknowledged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Cheng
- Second Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fushun Kou
- Second Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaosi Zhang
- Second Clinical Medical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yi Dai
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Oriental Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Hyogo University of Health Sciences, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Lei Shi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chune Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaohong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Junxiang Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Junxiang Li; Xiaohong Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No. 6, 1st Section Fangxingyuan, Fangzhuang, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100078, People’s Republic of China, Email ;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lin B, Kou J, Xiao Q, Wu S, Hu J, Li J, Zhu Z, Zhou X, Xin L, Li Y, Wang Z. Identification, characterization, synthesis of major metabolites biotransformed from vonoprazan fumarate. Tetrahedron 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2022.132669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
24
|
Xu WT, Xu XB, Ren TS, Qi XS. Vonoprazan for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Research advances. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2021; 29:1248-1253. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v29.i21.1248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common gastrointestinal disease that can be effectively treated by drugs alone. Proton pump inhibitors are the currently mainstay drugs for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, but are insufficiently effective. Vonoprazan, which is a new type of drug that inhibits gastric acid secretion, has been employed for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In this article, we comprehensively review the current evidence regarding clinical efficacy and safety of vonoprazan for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease to guide the clinical decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Tao Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110840, Liaoning Province, China,Postgraduate College, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xiang-Bo Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110840, Liaoning Province, China,Postgraduate College, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Tian-Shu Ren
- Department of Pharmacy, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110840, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xing-Shun Qi
- Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110840, Liaoning Province, China,Postgraduate College, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Effects of pirenzepine on vonoprazan-induced gastric acid inhibition and hypergastrinemia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 77:971-978. [PMID: 34059932 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-021-03162-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared to proton pump inhibitors, vonoprazan exerts a greater inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion and is useful for treating acid-related diseases, such as gastro-esophageal reflux disease. However, there is a problem that vonoprazan causes hypergastrinemia, which confers a risk of carcinoid tumor. A previous report demonstrated that pirenzepine, an M1 muscarinic receptor antagonist, enhances the acid inhibitory effects while suppressing hypergastrinemia induced by omeprazole. Here, we examined whether pirenzepine enhances the gastric acid inhibitory effects of vonoprazan without further increasing serum gastrin levels. METHODS Eleven healthy volunteers were subjected to 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin measurements on day 7 of three different regimens: pirenzepine 75 mg alone, vonoprazan 10 mg alone, and vonoprazan 10 mg plus pirenzepine 75 mg administered in a randomized crossover fashion. RESULTS Median pH 4 holding time ratios (range) achieved with pirenzepine 75 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg, and vonoprazan 10 mg plus pirenzepine 75 mg were 6.9% (2.4-32.8%), 88.4% (54.6-100%), and 84.2% (40.3-100%), respectively. Respective serum gastrin levels were 79 (75-210) pg/ml, 310 (110-870) pg/ml, and 170 (140-930) pg/ml. In cases with hypergastrinemia (gastrin ≥ 200 pg/ml) induced by vonoprazan 10 mg alone, concomitant treatment with pirenzepine significantly reduced serum gastrin levels from 370 to 180 pg/ml (P = 0.028). CONCLUSION Although pirenzepine does not enhance acid inhibition, it does improve hypergastrinemia induced by vonoprazan to some extent.
Collapse
|
26
|
Savarino V, Marabotto E, Zentilin P, Demarzo MG, de Bortoli N, Savarino E. Pharmacological Management of Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease: An Update of the State-of-the-Art. Drug Des Devel Ther 2021; 15:1609-1621. [PMID: 33907381 PMCID: PMC8064680 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s306371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a highly prevalent, chronic disorder, whose knowledge remains limited and the management of these patients changes continuously. This review provides a summary of the most recent advancements in the pathogenesis of this disease and the new drugs introduced into the market to overcome some of the unmet needs of traditional therapies. Nowadays, the most fruitful diagnostic examinations are 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring, which allows us to separate true NERD from esophageal functional disorders and high-resolution manometry, which helps to exclude the existence of motility disorders sharing the same symptoms of GERD. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain the first-choice therapy in the treatment of GERD, but a consistent proportion of these patients continue to experience symptoms despite their intake. These cases pertain mainly to the subpopulation with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and represent very challenging clinical situations, because it is mandatory to understand the reasons for PPI failure. The management of these difficult patients requires necessarily to test them and avoid the use of empiric treatments that are often unsuccessful, costly and potentially dangerous. Recently, several new drugs have been used to increase the defensive properties of this mucosa with promising results in randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Savarino
- Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Marabotto
- Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Patrizia Zentilin
- Department of Internal Medicine (DIMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Nicola de Bortoli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
How Does Vonoprazan Affect the Treatment of Erosive Esophagitis? Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:642-643. [PMID: 32535777 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06387-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
28
|
Talley NJ, Zand Irani M. Optimal management of severe symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Intern Med 2021; 289:162-178. [PMID: 32691466 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder, and empirical proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is often the first step of management; however, up to 40% of patients remain symptomatic despite PPI treatment. Refractory reflux refers to continued symptoms despite an adequate trial of PPI, and management remains challenging. The differential diagnosis is important; other oesophageal (e.g. eosinophilic oesophagitis) and gastroduodenal disorders (e.g. functional dyspepsia) should be ruled out, as this changes management. A combination of clinical assessment, endoscopic evaluation and in selected cases oesophageal function testing can help characterize patients with refractory reflux symptoms into oesophageal phenotypes so appropriate therapy can be more optimally targeted. Medical options then may include adding a H2 receptor antagonist, alginates, baclofen or antidepressant therapy, and there is emerging evidence for bile acid sequestrants and diaphragmatic breathing. The demonstration of a temporal association of symptoms with reflux events on pH-impedance testing (reflux hypersensitivity) serves to focus the management on modulating oesophageal perception and reducing the reflux burden, or identifies those with no obvious pathophysiologic abnormalities (functional heartburn). Anti-reflux surgery based on randomized controlled trial evidence has a role in reflux hypersensitivity or continued pathological acid reflux despite PPI in carefully considered, fully worked up cases that have failed medical therapy; approximately two of three cases will respond but there is a small risk of complications. In patients with persistent volume reflux despite medical therapy, given the lack of alternatives, anti-reflux surgery is a consideration. Promising newer approaches include endoscopic techniques. This review aims to summarize current diagnostic approaches and critically evaluates the evidence for the efficacy of available treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N J Talley
- From the, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence of Digestive Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - M Zand Irani
- From the, NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence of Digestive Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
The Potential Benefits of Vonoprazan as Helicobacter pylori Infection Therapy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2020; 13:ph13100276. [PMID: 32998241 PMCID: PMC7600708 DOI: 10.3390/ph13100276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori infection is a severe global health problem that is closely associated with acid-related diseases and gastric malignancies. Eradicating H. pylori is strongly recommended for lowering peptic ulcer recurrence and preventing gastric cancer. The current approved H. pylori eradication regimen combines a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) with two antibiotics. Unfortunately, this regimen failed to meet expectations mostly due to antibiotic resistance and insufficient gastric acid suppression. Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, showed promising results as a PPI replacement. Vonoprazan inhibits gastric acid secretion by acting as a reversible competitive inhibitor against potassium ions and forming disulfide bonds with the cysteine molecule of H+/K+-ATPase. Vonoprazan has superior pharmacological characteristics over PPI, such as no requirement for acid activation, stability in acidic conditions, shorter optimum acid suppression period, and resistance to cytochrome P (CYP)2C19 polymorphism. Several comparative randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses revealed the superiority of vonoprazan in eradicating H. pylori, notably the resistant strains. The adverse effect caused by vonoprazan is long-term acid suppression that may induce elevated gastrin serum, hypochlorhydria, and malabsorption. All vonoprazan studies have only been conducted in Japan. Further studies outside Japan are necessary for universally conclusive results.
Collapse
|
30
|
Chapelle N, Ben Ghezala I, Barkun A, Bardou M. The pharmacotherapeutic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 22:219-227. [PMID: 32893683 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1817385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a very common worldwide condition, affecting about 15-20% of the whole population, and representing a major burden for health-care systems. Because of its frequency, health physicians - family doctors as well as specialists - should be aware of the different pharmacotherapeutic approaches in managing GERD, according to disease severity. AREAS COVERED Authors summarize the pharmacological management of GERD in adults, present the different pharmaceutical classes, and review the evidence on efficacy for each treatment according to the most common clinical scenarios: non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD), erosive esophagitis (EE), and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) refractory GERD. They also provide an overview of treatments under development. EXPERT OPINION To date, PPIs remain the most effective treatment option for both NERD and EE. However, Potassium-Competitive Acid blockers (PCAB) may be considered, with at least similar efficacy in Asian populations. Preliminary data suggest that PCABs could be superior to classic PPIs in patients with severe EE, and may also be of particular interest in the management of PPI-refractory GERD patients. Their definitive role in GERD management, however, still remains to be determined based on properly designed and conducted randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Chapelle
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Service de Gastroentérologie, Oncologie Digestive et Assistance Nutritionnelle , Nantes, France
| | - Ines Ben Ghezala
- Centre d'Investigations Cliniques CIC1432, CHU de Dijon , Dijon, France
| | - Alan Barkun
- Gastroenterology Department, McGill University , Montreal, Canada
| | - Marc Bardou
- Centre d'Investigations Cliniques CIC1432, CHU de Dijon , Dijon, France.,Gastroenterology Department, CHU de Dijon , Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Savarino V, Marabotto E, Zentilin P, Furnari M, Bodini G, De Maria C, Tolone S, De Bortoli N, Frazzoni M, Savarino E. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and pharmacological treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2020; 13:437-449. [PMID: 32253948 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2020.1752664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a highly prevalent, chronic, relapsing disorder, whose knowledge has increased in last years thanks to the advent of new sophisticated techniques, such as 24-h impedance-pH monitoring and high-resolution manometry, for the study of esophageal functions. AREAS COVERED This review provides an overview of our advancements in understanding the complex pathophysiology, improving the diagnosis and defining the modern pharmacological therapeutic approach to GERD. EXPERT OPINION The growing clinical application of impedance-pH testing has allowed us to know the diversity of patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), who nowadays represent about 70% of the whole population with reflux symptoms. We have realized that NERD has to be considered as an umbrella term covering various subgroups with different pathophysiologies. The development of new impedance metrics, in particular mean nocturnal baseline impedance, seems to be promising in the improvement of the diagnostic process of this disease. There are no particularly innovative features in the pharmacological therapy of GERD, unless the interest toward drugs is able to increase the defense properties of esophageal mucosa and/or its protection. These compounds can be of help in combination with proton pump inhibitors in NERD patients with partial response to antisecretory drugs alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elisa Marabotto
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Manuele Furnari
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgia Bodini
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa , Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Tolone
- Department of Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" , Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola De Bortoli
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa , Pisa, Italy
| | - Marzio Frazzoni
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Baggiovara Hospital , Modena, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua , Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|